Why does Java not have a file copy method? This seems like such an obvious thing to have, and it saves people from writing things like this example.
The Java API is missing more than just file copying. You might be interested in checking out the Apache Commons libraries. For example, the IO library's FileUtils provides file copying methods.
My guess is because when the File io system was written, they decided they did not want to deal with the cross-platform problems of copying files, and punted - i.e. they said "this is doable by others, and is not that common".
One thing to keep in mind about Java is that it is cross-platform, so some things are more difficult because of that reality.
java.io.File is a relatively simple class introduced in 1.0. JDK 1.0 didn't have much in it - mostly related to support for applets and the javac compiler. I guess there hasn't been a great deal of pressure to expand it - applets and enterprise software are not oriented in that direction.
However, lots has been added to I/O for JDK7. Including [java.nio.file.Path.copyTo][1].
[1]: http://download.java.net/jdk7/docs/api/java/nio/file/Path.html#copyTo(java.nio.file.Path, java.nio.file.CopyOption...)
For the same reason Java does not have many other things. which end up being implemented by external libraries.
I am sure you can easily find such a library, or you can write a function.
Related
It seems like that working with jni will become my everyday routine for a few months. Is there any some tools which simplify dealing with mixed Java + C++ projects?
Is it possible to re-generate glue *.h files and rebuild native libraries automatically? Or I should write some scripts for maven, ant, gradle, anything_else?
Is there any experience?
Check out JavaCPP! I also list other solutions on that page... There's also Jace that is useful when trying to use Java from C++.
Some months ago I faced the same questions. It seems that Java/C++ interop is reviving just now, and that you are one of the pioneers.
If you're merely using C++ objects from Java, JNA may be a better solution.
If you're using Java from C++, I didn't yet encounter a mature library. Although functionally quite complete, JNI is is a C api (intentionally, if you read the design rationale). If you are about to write lots of code for it, I think it'll pay to write a C++ framework around it that wraps the bare jobject ,jnienv, jclass... handles into explicit resources.
The real issues arise when the C++ and Java have to co-operate using callbacks etc... Buckle up if that's your intent...
You are asking about an experience. So my experience is, that you should start with very well designed requirements, behavior and objects lifecycle. That should result in a mature interface which will change very little in the future. The effect is that you will need to change the glue header files rarely and simple one shot javah is good enough. It all doesn't sound very agile i know, but then JNI is everything but a rapid development environment.
Changing the interface twice a day, adding and removing methods and changing signatures "just to see if it helps" is a sure road to hell. You are connecting two very different worlds in terms of memory management and JVM can get nervous very easily. Thread safety is yet another level up. The mentioned helper solutions, while they are undoubtely a clever piece of software, might give you a false perception that JNI is easy. Then JVM starts giving you exceptions out of nowhere, your objects will start geting uninitalized randomly, etc...
You can use SWIG to automatically generate glue code and have an make target to rebuild the native libraries. You can also use ANT's c++ task for the same purpose.
It is possible to access bits of MATLAB's internal java code to programmatically change MATLAB itself. For example, you can programmatically open a document in the editor using
editorServices = com.mathworks.mlservices.MLEditorServices;
editorServices.newDocument() %older versions of MATLAB seem to use new()
You can see the method signatures (but not what they do) using methodsview.
methodsview(com.mathworks.mlservices.MLEditorServices)
I have a few related questions about using these Java methods.
Firstly, is there any documentation on these things (either from the Mathworks or otherwise)?
Secondly, how do you find out what methods are available? The ones I've come across appear to be contained in JAR files in matlabroot\java\jar, but I'm not sure what the best way to inspect a JAR file is.
Thirdly, are there functions for inspecting the classes, other than methodsview?
Finally, are there any really useful methods that anyone has found?
There is no official documentation nor support for these classes. Moreover, these classes and internal methods represent internal implementation that may change without notice in any future Matlab release. This said, you can use my uiinspect and checkClass utilities to investigate the internal methods, properties and static fields. These utilities use Java reflection to do their job, something which is also done by the built-in methodsview function (I believe my utilities are far more powerful, though). In this respect, I believe we are not crossing the line of reverse-engineering which may violate Matlab's license.
If you are looking for documentation, then my UndocumentedMatlab.com website has plenty of relevant resources, and more is added on a regular basis so keep tuned.
I am also working on a book that will present a very detailed overview of all these internal classes, among other undocumented stuff - I hope to have publication news later this year.
I am an eclipse fan. If you use that as your IDE, the jar can be imported into one of your projects and you can inspect the methods in there.
To find out more about java objects, I use uiinspect.
The only place I know that is documenting the Matlab hidden Java stuff is Undocumented Matlab by Yair Altman. His site lists plenty of very useful tricks. Being able to use Java to format text in list boxes has come in very handy for me, for example.
EDIT
The man has spoken. Listen to him, since I don't think there's anyone outside MathWorks who knows more about Matlab's internal java code.
Undocumented Matlab is a great place to start looking.
Wondering if anyone has experience and/or sample code for making DDE calls from Java. I've done DDE using win32 calls from the stddde library (DdeInitialize, DdeClientTransaction), and could write a JNI wrapper for this, but I was thinking that it might be nice to do it from JNA
I also have some concerns about the fact that DDE calls need to occur from a thread with message pump, and I'm not entirely certain of how to force that in Java.
The calls we'll be doing are pretty simple (equivalent to VBA's DDInitiate, DDEExcecute and DDETerminate functions).
http://jdde.pretty-tools.com/
A decade ago I used Neva Object Technology's little DDE wrapper. Works, if you like that sort of thing. But IIRC, you should read the FAQ (although the things it does probably aren't so surprising if you have used DDE before).
JNA now has a DDE implementation in its contrib repository (the compiled classes are available in the jna-platform artifact):
https://github.com/java-native-access/jna/blob/master/contrib/platform/src/com/sun/jna/platform/win32/DdemlUtil.java
The unit tests contain many usage examples:
https://github.com/java-native-access/jna/blob/master/contrib/platform/test/com/sun/jna/platform/win32/DdemlUtilTest.java
I'm trying to code an application which runs un different java platforms like J2SE, J2ME, Android, etc. I already know that I'll have to rewrite most of the UI for each platform, but want to reuse the core logic.
Keeping this core portable involves three drawbacks that I know of:
Keeping to the old Java 1.4 syntax, not using any of the nice language features of Java 5.0
only using external libraries that are known to work on those platforms (that is: don't use JNI and don't have dependencies to other libs which violate this rules)
only using the classes which are present on all those platforms
I know of ways to overcome (1): code in 5.0 style and automatically convert it to 1.4 (retroweaver - haven't tried it yet, but seems ok).
I think (2) is a problem that I just have to accept.
Now I'd like to know what's the best workarround for (3), especially collection classes, which I miss the most. I can think of those:
Most programmers I know just don't use Set, Map, List, etc. and fallback to Vector and plain Arrays. I think this makes code ugly in the first place. But I also know that the right choice between TreeSet/Hashset or LinkedList/ArrayList is crucial for performance, and always using Vector and Arrays can't be right.
I could code my own implementations of that classes. This seems to be reinventing the wheel, and I think I could not do it as good as others have done.
Since Java is open source, I could grab the sourcecode of the J2SE Collections framework and include into my application when building for J2ME. I don't know if this is a good idea, though. Pherhaps there are good reasons not to do this.
Maybe there already are libraries out there, which rebuild the most important features of the collections framework, but are optimized for low end systems, pherhaps by not implementing functionality that is used infrequently. Do you know any?
Thanks for your answers and opinions!
Edit: I finally found a (complex, but nice) solution, and I thought by providing my own answer and accepting it, the solution would become visible at the top. But to the contrary, my answer is still at the very bottom.
J2ME is brutal, and you're just going to have to resign yourself to doing without some of the niceties of other platforms. Get used to Hashtable and Vector, and writing your own wrappers on top of those. Also, don't make the mistake of assuming that J2ME is standard either, as each manufacturer's JVM can do things in profoundly different ways. I wouldn't worry much about performance initially, as just getting correctness on J2ME is enough of a challenge. It is possible to write an app that runs across J2ME, J2SE and Android, as I've done it, but it takes a lot of work. One suggestion that I'd have is that you write the core of your application logic and keep it strictly to java.lang, java.util and java.io. Anywhere where you're going to be doing something that might interact with the platform, such as the file system or network, you can create an interface that your core application code interacts with, that you have different implementations for the different environments. For example, you can have an interface that wraps up HTTP stuff, and uses javax.microedition.io.HttpConnection with J2ME and java.net.HttpURLConnection on Android. It's a pain, but if you want to maintain an app running on all three of those environments, it can get you there. Good luck.
It's been a while since I asked this question, and I while since I found a nice, working solution for the problem, but I had since forgotton to tell you.
My main focus was the Java Collections Framework, which is part of the java.util package.
I've finally taken the source code of Suns Java 6.0 and copied all the classes that belong to the Collections framework into a project of my own. This was a Java 6.0 project, but I used the jars from J2ME as classpath. Most of those classes that I copied depend on other J2SE classes, so there are broken dependencies. Anyway, it was quite easy to cut those depensencies by leaving out everything that deals with serialization (which is not a priority for me) and some minor adjustments.
I compiled the whole thing with a Java 6 compiler, and retrotranslator was used to port the resulting bytecode back to Java 1.2.
Next problem is the package name, because you can't deliver classes from java.util with a J2ME application and load them - the bootstrap class loader won't look into the applications jar file, the other bootloaders aren't allowed to load something with that package name, and on J2ME you can't define custom classloaders. Retrotranslator not only converts bytecode, it also helps to change name references in existing bytecode. I had to move and rename all classes in my project, e.g. java.util.TreeMap became my.company.backport.java.util.TreeMap_.
I was than able to write actual J2ME application in a second Java 6.0 project which referenced the usual java.util.TreeMap, using the generic syntax to create type-safe collections, compile that app to Java 6.0 byte code, and run it through retrotranslator to create Java 1.2 code that now references my.company.backport.java.util.TreeMap_. Note that TreeMap is just an example, it actually works for the whole collections framework and even for 3rd party J2SE Jars that reference that framework.
The resulting app can be packaged as a jar and jad file, and runs fine on both J2ME emulators and actual devices (tested on a Sony Ericsson W880i).
The whole process seems rather complex, but since I used Ant for build automation, and I needed retranslator anyway, there only was a one-time overhead to setup the collection framework backport.
As stated above, I've done this nearly a year ago, and writing this mostly from the top of my head, so I hope there are no errors in it. If you are interested in more details, leave me a comment. I've got a few pages of German documentation about that process, which I could provide if there is any demand.
We faced exactly this situation in developing zxing. If J2ME is in your list of targets, this is your limiting factor by far. We targeted MIDP 2.0 / CLDC 1.1. If you have a similar requirement, you need to stick to Java 1.2. Java 1.4 language features are definitely not present (like assert) and in general you won't find anything after 1.2 in J2ME.
We did not use external libraries, but, you could package them into your deployed .jar file with little trouble. It would make the resulting .jar bigger, and that could be an issue. (Then you can try optimizers/shrinkers like ProGuard to mitigate that.)
I did end up reimplementing something like Collections.sort() and Comparator since we needed them and they are not in J2ME. So yeah you might consider doing this in cases, though only where necessary.
We used Vector and Hashtable and arrays since there is no other choice, really, in J2ME. I would just use them unless you have a reason not to, and that would be performance I guess. In theory JVM makers are already optimizing their implementation but that doesn't mean you couldn't make a better one... I guess I would be surprised if it is worth it in the vast majority of cases. Just make sure you really need to do this before putting in the effort.
To answer part of your question another collections library would be Javolution which can be built for j2me.
Are there inexpensive or free gateways from .NET to Java? I'm looking at some data acquisition hardware which has drivers for C/C++ and .NET -- I really don't want to do any programming in .NET.
Update: I haven't done what I originally wanted to do, but I've done something similar, using JNA to encapsulate some functions from a DLL, in order to control a USB hardware device from Java. (the DLL comes from the device manufacturer) It works really nicely. Thanks!
You could also try to use JNA for accessing the native library. JNA provides Java programs easy access to native shared libraries (DLLs on Windows) without writing anything but Java code—no JNI or native code is required. If their API is fairly straight foward, this might be the path of least resistance.
See their getting started guide where they call some native code (printf and GetSystemTime).
Well, there's JNBridge and EZ JCom, just from a Google search.
You could also use IKVM which is a slightly different approach.
(Any reason for not wanting to learn .NET, out of interest? It's a nice platform, and C# is a lovely language...)
If they have C++ versions of the drivers then you could write a wrapper around it using JNI and then load that in Java. JNI can be a bit of a pain, but it would let you use the C++ version of their drivers and not have to deal with .Net at all if you don't want.
I am partial to the recommendation to jump in the deep end with C# since it is so similar to Java. I did this and used IKVM to compile my favorite Java libs. to .NET assemblies and you get [nearly] all the core java runtime classes to boot, so if you tire of trying to find just the right C# collection type, you can always go back to java.util. (No generic collections though. Not sure why.)
Depending on what platform you're on, you have several choices for free IDEs too. For windows you can get Visual Studio Express for free but I also use SharpDevelop. You can also get the Mono IDE on Linux (and a few flavours of Unix, I think ?).
The C# learning curve is shallow if you already know Java. I only blew off 1.5 limbs on landmines that came out of nowhere for reasons I still don't understand, but workarounds were easy to come by. The worst thing about it was the darn developer docs which are AWFUL on account of being so slow. I really miss the snappiness of JavaDoc. Not only are the online docs incredibly slow, the problem is compounded by someones's iffy decision to put class summaries, constructors and methods/properties all on seperate pages so it just takes forever. Someone said to get the docs installer and install docs locally for a slightly improved experience. Not a bad idea I suppose.
I am author of jni4net, open source interprocess bridge between JVM and CLR. It's build on top of JNI and PInvoke. No C/C++ code needed. I hope it will help you.
If you have a Java application, the JNI mentioned by the others will be the way to go. You write some wrapper classes, and that's it.
If writing the wrappes is a too big task (depending on the number of methods you have to wrap), have a look at SWIG . I think it generates wrappers automatically, but I never actually used it.
If you want to code in the Java language, but you don't care if your program will run on the JRE/JVM, then you might as well use Microsoft J#. Basically, it's writing Java-Code wich is compiled to .NET-Bytecode and can use the .NET classes of the driver as well as your existing Java classes. With J# you will run into problems if your existing Java-code is newer than Java 1.4, look at this question on how to solve them.
From that point on, you could later add code in J#, C# or any other .NET language. However, you won't get back to the JRE/JVM easily.