What's the equivalent of C's "static" keyword in Java?

What's the equivalent of C's "static" keyword in Java? - java

I want to know what could be the equivalent keyword in java which could perform same function as "Static keyword in C".. I want to do recursion in java, performing same function that a static keyword in C does...
Please help..

C has two entirely different uses of the static keyword, and C++ adds a third use:
// Use 1: declare a variable or function to be local to a given module
// At global scope:
static int global_var;
static void func();
In this case, the global variable global_var and the function void func() can only be accessed inside the file in which they are declared; they cannot be accessed by any other file.
// Use 2: declare a variable inside a function with global scope
void func(void)
{
static int x;
}
In this case, the variable x is effectively a global variable, in that there is only one instance of it -- multiple calls to func() (including recursive calls) will always access the same variable.
// Use 3 (C++ only): declare a global variable with class scope
class Widget
{
public:
static int var;
};
In this case, this declares the variable Widget::var as a global variable, but its scope is different. Outside of class member functions, it has to be named as Widget::var; inside class member functions, it can be named as just var. It can also be made protected or private to limit its scope even more.
Now, what are the analogs of these 3 uses in Java?
Case 1 has no direct analog; the closest is declaring objects with package scope, which is done by omitting a public, protected, or private:
class Widget // Declare a class with package scope
{
int x; // Declare a member variable with package scope
void func() {} // Declare a member function with package scope
}
In this case, the declared objects are only accessible by classes within the same package; they are not accessible to other packages.
Case 2 also does not have an analog in Java. The closest you can get is by declaring a global variable (that is, a static class variable, since Java doesn't have true global variables in the strictest sense):
class Widget
{
private static int func_x;
public static void func()
{
// use func_x here in place of 'static int x' in the C example
}
}
Case 3 is the only case that has a direct analog in Java. In this case, the static keyword serves exactly the same purpose.

The "static" keyword in C actually serves two functions depending on where it's used. Those functions are visibility and duration (these are my terms based on quite a bit of teaching, the standard, if you're interested in that level of detail, uses different terms which I often find confuses new students, hence my reticence in using them).
When used at file level, it marks an item (variable or function) as non-exported so that a linker cannot see it. This is static as in visibility, duration is the same as the program (i.e., until the program exits). This is useful for encapsulating the item within a single compilation unit (a source file, in its simplest definition). The item is available to the whole compilation unit (assuming it's declared before use).
When used within a function, it controls duration (visibility is limited to within the function). In this case, the item is also created once and endures until the program exits. Non-static variables within a function are created and destroyed on function entry and exit.
I gather what you're after is the first type, basically a global variable since I can't immediately see much of a use for the other variant in recursion..
It can't be done since, in Java, everything must belong to a class. The workaround is to create a class holding the "globals" and either:
pass that object around so you can reference its members; or
construct a singleton item so you can access its members.

Java doesn't have global variables, so there isn't a direct equivalent. However, there's a static keyword in Java that shares the state of a field with all instances of a class, which is a good approximation to what you're describing.
I want to do recursion in java, performing same function that a static keyword in C does...
However, if you're looking to do recursion, are you sure that static variables are what you need? Any special state needed for a recursive function call is almost always passed back to itself, not maintained separately.

The concept of static in Java doesn't adhere with the concept of static in C. However, there is a static keyword in Java as well. But its more like a static in C++ then C, with some differences.

You can simulate a static class in java as follows:
/**
* Utility class: this class contains only static methods and behaves as a static class.
*/
public abstract class Utilities
{
// prevent inheritance
private Utilities()
{
}
// ... all your static methods here
public static Person convert(string) {...}
}
This class cannot be inherited (like final because although abstract it has a private constuctor), cannot be instantiated (like static because abstract) so only static methods in it can be called.

Related

What's the benefit of using class name to access static methods and static variables in java instead of creating objects and calling them? [duplicate]

I am wondering when to use static methods? Say if I have a class with a few getters and setters, a method or two, and I want those methods only to be invokable on an instance object of the class. Does this mean I should use a static method?
Example:
Obj x = new Obj();
x.someMethod();
...or:
Obj.someMethod(); // Is this the static way?
I'm rather confused!

One rule-of-thumb: ask yourself "Does it make sense to call this method, even if no object has been constructed yet?" If so, it should definitely be static.
So in a class Car you might have a method:
double convertMpgToKpl(double mpg)
...which would be static, because one might want to know what 35mpg converts to, even if nobody has ever built a Car. But this method (which sets the efficiency of one particular Car):
void setMileage(double mpg)
...can't be static since it's inconceivable to call the method before any Car has been constructed.
(By the way, the converse isn't always true: you might sometimes have a method which involves two Car objects, and still want it to be static. E.g.:
Car theMoreEfficientOf(Car c1, Car c2)
Although this could be converted to a non-static version, some would argue that since there isn't a "privileged" choice of which Car is more important, you shouldn't force a caller to choose one Car as the object you'll invoke the method on. This situation accounts for a fairly small fraction of all static methods, though.

Define static methods in the following scenarios only:
If you are writing utility classes and they are not supposed to be changed.
If the method is not using any instance variable.
If any operation is not dependent on instance creation.
If there is some code that can easily be shared by all the instance methods, extract that code into a static method.
If you are sure that the definition of the method will never be changed or overridden. As static methods can not be overridden.

There are some valid reasons to use static methods:
Performance: if you want some code to be run, and don't want to instantiate an extra object to do so, shove it into a static method. The JVM also can optimize static methods a lot (I think I've once read James Gosling declaring that you don't need custom instructions in the JVM, since static methods will be just as fast, but couldn't find the source - thus it could be completely false). Yes, it is micro-optimization, and probably unneeded. And we programmers never do unneeded things just because they are cool, right?
Practicality: instead of calling new Util().method(arg), call Util.method(arg), or method(arg) with static imports. Easier, shorter.
Adding methods: you really wanted the class String to have a removeSpecialChars() instance method, but it's not there (and it shouldn't, since your project's special characters may be different from the other project's), and you can't add it (since Java is somewhat sane), so you create an utility class, and call removeSpecialChars(s) instead of s.removeSpecialChars(). Sweet.
Purity: taking some precautions, your static method will be a pure function, that is, the only thing it depends on is its parameters. Data in, data out. This is easier to read and debug, since you don't have inheritance quirks to worry about. You can do it with instance methods too, but the compiler will help you a little more with static methods (by not allowing references to instance attributes, overriding methods, etc.).
You'll also have to create a static method if you want to make a singleton, but... don't. I mean, think twice.
Now, more importantly, why you wouldn't want to create a static method? Basically, polymorphism goes out of the window. You'll not be able to override the method, nor declare it in an interface (pre-Java 8). It takes a lot of flexibility out from your design. Also, if you need state, you'll end up with lots of concurrency bugs and/or bottlenecks if you are not careful.

After reading Misko's articles I believe that static methods are bad from a testing point of view. You should have factories instead(maybe using a dependency injection tool like Guice).
how do I ensure that I only have one of something
only have one of something
The problem of “how do I ensure that I
only have one of something” is nicely
sidestepped. You instantiate only a
single ApplicationFactory in your
main, and as a result, you only
instantiate a single instance of all
of your singletons.
The basic issue with static methods is they are procedural code
The basic issue with static methods is
they are procedural code. I have no
idea how to unit-test procedural code.
Unit-testing assumes that I can
instantiate a piece of my application
in isolation. During the instantiation
I wire the dependencies with
mocks/friendlies which replace the
real dependencies. With procedural
programing there is nothing to "wire"
since there are no objects, the code
and data are separate.

A static method is one type of method which doesn't need any object to be initialized for it to be called. Have you noticed static is used in the main function in Java? Program execution begins from there without an object being created.
Consider the following example:
class Languages
{
public static void main(String[] args)
{
display();
}
static void display()
{
System.out.println("Java is my favorite programming language.");
}
}

Static methods in java belong to the class (not an instance of it). They use no instance variables and will usually take input from the parameters, perform actions on it, then return some result. Instances methods are associated with objects and, as the name implies, can use instance variables.

No, static methods aren't associated with an instance; they belong to the class. Static methods are your second example; instance methods are the first.

If you apply static keyword with any method, it is known as static method.
A static method belongs to the class rather than object of a class.
A static method invoked without the need for creating an instance of a class.
static method can access static data member and can change the value of it.
A static method can be accessed just using the name of a class dot static name . . . example : Student9.change();
If you want to use non-static fields of a class, you must use a non-static method.
//Program of changing the common property of all objects(static field).
class Student9{
int rollno;
String name;
static String college = "ITS";
static void change(){
college = "BBDIT";
}
Student9(int r, String n){
rollno = r;
name = n;
}
void display (){System.out.println(rollno+" "+name+" "+college);}
public static void main(String args[]){
Student9.change();
Student9 s1 = new Student9 (111,"Indian");
Student9 s2 = new Student9 (222,"American");
Student9 s3 = new Student9 (333,"China");
s1.display();
s2.display();
s3.display();
} }
O/P: 111 Indian BBDIT
222 American BBDIT
333 China BBDIT

Static methods are not associated with an instance, so they can not access any non-static fields in the class.
You would use a static method if the method does not use any fields (or only static fields) of a class.
If any non-static fields of a class are used you must use a non-static method.

Static methods should be called on the Class, Instance methods should be called on the Instances of the Class. But what does that mean in reality? Here is a useful example:
A car class might have an instance method called Accelerate(). You can only Accelerate a car, if the car actually exists (has been constructed) and therefore this would be an instance method.
A car class might also have a count method called GetCarCount(). This would return the total number of cars created (or constructed). If no cars have been constructed, this method would return 0, but it should still be able to be called, and therefore it would have to be a static method.

Use a static method when you want to be able to access the method without an instance of the class.

Actually, we use static properties and methods in a class, when we want to use some part of our program should exists there until our program is running. And we know that, to manipulate static properties, we need static methods as they are not a part of instance variable. And without static methods, to manipulate static properties is time consuming.

Static:
Obj.someMethod
Use static when you want to provide class level access to a method, i.e. where the method should be callable without an instance of the class.

Static methods don't need to be invoked on the object and that is when you use it. Example: your Main() is a static and you don't create an object to call it.

Static methods and variables are controlled version of 'Global' functions and variables in Java. In which methods can be accessed as classname.methodName() or classInstanceName.methodName(), i.e. static methods and variables can be accessed using class name as well as instances of the class.
Class can't be declared as static(because it makes no sense. if a class is declared public, it can be accessed from anywhere), inner classes can be declared static.

Static methods can be used if
One does not want to perform an action on an instance (utility methods)
As mentioned in few of above answers in this post, converting miles to kilometers, or calculating temperature from Fahrenheit to Celsius and vice-versa. With these examples using static method, it does not need to instantiate whole new object in heap memory. Consider below
1. new ABCClass(double farenheit).convertFarenheitToCelcium()
2. ABCClass.convertFarenheitToCelcium(double farenheit)
the former creates a new class footprint for every method invoke, Performance, Practical. Examples are Math and Apache-Commons library StringUtils class below:
Math.random()
Math.sqrt(double)
Math.min(int, int)
StringUtils.isEmpty(String)
StringUtils.isBlank(String)
One wants to use as a simple function. Inputs are explictly passed, and getting the result data as return value. Inheritence, object instanciation does not come into picture. Concise, Readable.
NOTE:
Few folks argue against testability of static methods, but static methods can be tested too! With jMockit, one can mock static methods. Testability. Example below:
new MockUp<ClassName>() {
#Mock
public int doSomething(Input input1, Input input2){
return returnValue;
}
};

I found a nice description, when to use static methods:
There is no hard and fast, well written rules, to decide when to make a method static or not, But there are few observations based upon experience, which not only help to make a method static but also teaches when to use static method in Java. You should consider making a method static in Java :
If a method doesn't modify state of object, or not using any instance variables.
You want to call method without creating instance of that class.
A method is good candidate of being static, if it only work on arguments provided to it e.g. public int factorial(int number){}, this method only operate on number provided as argument.
Utility methods are also good candidate of being static e.g. StringUtils.isEmpty(String text), this a utility method to check if a String is empty or not.
If function of method will remain static across class hierarchy e.g. equals() method is not a good candidate of making static because every Class can redefine equality.
Source is here

Static methods are the methods in Java that can be called without creating an object of class. It is belong to the class.
We use static method when we no need to be invoked method using instance.

A static method has two main purposes:
For utility or helper methods that don't require any object state.
Since there is no need to access instance variables, having static
methods eliminates the need for the caller to instantiate the object
just to call the method.
For the state that is shared by all
instances of the class, like a counter. All instance must share the
same state. Methods that merely use that state should be static as
well.

You should use static methods whenever,
The code in the method is not dependent on instance creation and is
not using any instance variable.
A particular piece of code is to be shared by all the instance methods.
The definition of the method should not be changed or overridden.
you are writing utility classes that should not be changed.
https://www.tutorialspoint.com/When-to-use-static-methods-in-Java

In eclipse you can enable a warning which helps you detect potential static methods. (Above the highlighted line is another one I forgot to highlight)

I am wondering when to use static methods?
A common use for static methods is to access static fields.
But you can have static methods, without referencing static variables. Helper methods without referring static variable can be found in some java classes like java.lang.Math
public static int min(int a, int b) {
return (a <= b) ? a : b;
}
The other use case, I can think of these methods combined with synchronized method is implementation of class level locking in multi threaded environment.
Say if I have a class with a few getters and setters, a method or two, and I want those methods only to be invokable on an instance object of the class. Does this mean I should use a static method?
If you need to access method on an instance object of the class, your method should should be non static.
Oracle documentation page provides more details.
Not all combinations of instance and class variables and methods are allowed:
Instance methods can access instance variables and instance methods directly.
Instance methods can access class variables and class methods directly.
Class methods can access class variables and class methods directly.
Class methods cannot access instance variables or instance methods directly—they must use an object reference. Also, class methods cannot use the this keyword as there is no instance for this to refer to.

Whenever you do not want to create an object to call a method in your code just declare that method as static. Since the static method does not need an instance to be called with but the catch here is not all static methods are called by JVM automatically. This privilege is enjoyed only by the main() "public static void main[String... args]" method in java because at Runtime this is the method Signature public "static" void main[] sought by JVM as an entry point to start execution of the code.
Example:
public class Demo
{
public static void main(String... args)
{
Demo d = new Demo();
System.out.println("This static method is executed by JVM");
//Now to call the static method Displ() you can use the below methods:
Displ(); //By method name itself
Demo.Displ(); //By using class name//Recommended
d.Displ(); //By using instance //Not recommended
}
public static void Displ()
{
System.out.println("This static method needs to be called explicitly");
}
}
Output:-
This static method is executed by JVM
This static method needs to be called explicitly
This static method needs to be called explicitly
This static method needs to be called explicitly

The only reasonable place to use static methods are probably Math functions, and of course main() must be static, and maybe small factory-methods. But logic should not be kept in static methods.

Java - Is it ok to instantiate class objects inside class? [duplicate]

Why can we access a static variable via an object reference in Java, like the code below?
public class Static {
private static String x = "Static variable";
public String getX() {
return this.x; // Case #1
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
Static member = new Static();
System.out.println(member.x); // Case #2
}
}

Generally, public variables can be accessed by everybody, and private variables can only be accessed from within the current instance of the class. In your example you're allowed to access the x variable from the main method, because that method is within the Static class.
If you're wondering why you're allowed to access it from another instance of Static class than the one you're currently in (which generally isn't allowed for private variables), it's simply because static variables don't exist on a per-instance basis, but on a per class basis. This means that the same static variable of A can be accessed from all instances of A.
If this wasn't the case, nobody would be able to access the private static variable at all, since it doesn't belong to one instance, but them all.

The reason that it is allowed is that the JLS says it is. The specific sections that allows this are JLS 6.5.6.2 (for the member.x cases) and JLS 15.11.1 (in both cases). The latter says:
If the field is static:
If the field is a non-blank final field, then the result is the value of the specified class variable in the class or interface that is the type of the Primary expression.
If the field is not final, or is a blank final and the field access occurs in a class variable initializer (§8.3.2) or static initializer (§8.7), then the result is a variable, namely, the specified class variable in the class that is the type of the Primary expression.
Why are these allowed by the JLS?
Frankly, I don't know. I can't think of any good reasons to allow them.
Either way, using a reference or this to access a static variable is a bad idea because most programmers are likely to be mislead into thinking that you are using an instance field. That is a strong reason to not use this feature of Java.
In your first and second cases you should reference the variable as x or Static.x rather than member.x. (I prefer Static.x.)

It is not best practice to reference a static variable in that way.
However your question was why is it allowed? I would guess the answer is to that a developer can change an instance member (field or variable) to a static member without having to change all the references to that member.
This is especially true in multi-developer environments. Otherwise your code may fail to compile just because your partner changed some instance variables to static variables.

static variables are otherwise called as class variables, because they are available to each object of that class.
As member is an object of the class Static, so you can access all static as wll as non static variables of Static class through member object.

The non-static member is instance member. The static member(class wide) could not access instance members because, there are no way to determine which instance owns any specific non-static members.
The instance object could always refers to static members as it belongs to class which global(shared) to its instances.

This logically makes sense although it is not interesting practice. Static variable is usually for enforcing single declaration of variable during instantiation. Object is a new copy of Class with other name. Even though object is new copy of class it is still with characteristics of the (uninstantiated) Class (first invisible instance). Therefore new object also has that static members pointing to the original copy. Thing to note is: New instance of StackOverflow is also StackOverflow.

Running a class method concurrently in multiple threads [duplicate]

I am wondering when to use static methods? Say if I have a class with a few getters and setters, a method or two, and I want those methods only to be invokable on an instance object of the class. Does this mean I should use a static method?
Example:
Obj x = new Obj();
x.someMethod();
...or:
Obj.someMethod(); // Is this the static way?
I'm rather confused!

One rule-of-thumb: ask yourself "Does it make sense to call this method, even if no object has been constructed yet?" If so, it should definitely be static.
So in a class Car you might have a method:
double convertMpgToKpl(double mpg)
...which would be static, because one might want to know what 35mpg converts to, even if nobody has ever built a Car. But this method (which sets the efficiency of one particular Car):
void setMileage(double mpg)
...can't be static since it's inconceivable to call the method before any Car has been constructed.
(By the way, the converse isn't always true: you might sometimes have a method which involves two Car objects, and still want it to be static. E.g.:
Car theMoreEfficientOf(Car c1, Car c2)
Although this could be converted to a non-static version, some would argue that since there isn't a "privileged" choice of which Car is more important, you shouldn't force a caller to choose one Car as the object you'll invoke the method on. This situation accounts for a fairly small fraction of all static methods, though.

Define static methods in the following scenarios only:
If you are writing utility classes and they are not supposed to be changed.
If the method is not using any instance variable.
If any operation is not dependent on instance creation.
If there is some code that can easily be shared by all the instance methods, extract that code into a static method.
If you are sure that the definition of the method will never be changed or overridden. As static methods can not be overridden.

There are some valid reasons to use static methods:
Performance: if you want some code to be run, and don't want to instantiate an extra object to do so, shove it into a static method. The JVM also can optimize static methods a lot (I think I've once read James Gosling declaring that you don't need custom instructions in the JVM, since static methods will be just as fast, but couldn't find the source - thus it could be completely false). Yes, it is micro-optimization, and probably unneeded. And we programmers never do unneeded things just because they are cool, right?
Practicality: instead of calling new Util().method(arg), call Util.method(arg), or method(arg) with static imports. Easier, shorter.
Adding methods: you really wanted the class String to have a removeSpecialChars() instance method, but it's not there (and it shouldn't, since your project's special characters may be different from the other project's), and you can't add it (since Java is somewhat sane), so you create an utility class, and call removeSpecialChars(s) instead of s.removeSpecialChars(). Sweet.
Purity: taking some precautions, your static method will be a pure function, that is, the only thing it depends on is its parameters. Data in, data out. This is easier to read and debug, since you don't have inheritance quirks to worry about. You can do it with instance methods too, but the compiler will help you a little more with static methods (by not allowing references to instance attributes, overriding methods, etc.).
You'll also have to create a static method if you want to make a singleton, but... don't. I mean, think twice.
Now, more importantly, why you wouldn't want to create a static method? Basically, polymorphism goes out of the window. You'll not be able to override the method, nor declare it in an interface (pre-Java 8). It takes a lot of flexibility out from your design. Also, if you need state, you'll end up with lots of concurrency bugs and/or bottlenecks if you are not careful.

After reading Misko's articles I believe that static methods are bad from a testing point of view. You should have factories instead(maybe using a dependency injection tool like Guice).
how do I ensure that I only have one of something
only have one of something
The problem of “how do I ensure that I
only have one of something” is nicely
sidestepped. You instantiate only a
single ApplicationFactory in your
main, and as a result, you only
instantiate a single instance of all
of your singletons.
The basic issue with static methods is they are procedural code
The basic issue with static methods is
they are procedural code. I have no
idea how to unit-test procedural code.
Unit-testing assumes that I can
instantiate a piece of my application
in isolation. During the instantiation
I wire the dependencies with
mocks/friendlies which replace the
real dependencies. With procedural
programing there is nothing to "wire"
since there are no objects, the code
and data are separate.

A static method is one type of method which doesn't need any object to be initialized for it to be called. Have you noticed static is used in the main function in Java? Program execution begins from there without an object being created.
Consider the following example:
class Languages
{
public static void main(String[] args)
{
display();
}
static void display()
{
System.out.println("Java is my favorite programming language.");
}
}

Static methods in java belong to the class (not an instance of it). They use no instance variables and will usually take input from the parameters, perform actions on it, then return some result. Instances methods are associated with objects and, as the name implies, can use instance variables.

No, static methods aren't associated with an instance; they belong to the class. Static methods are your second example; instance methods are the first.

If you apply static keyword with any method, it is known as static method.
A static method belongs to the class rather than object of a class.
A static method invoked without the need for creating an instance of a class.
static method can access static data member and can change the value of it.
A static method can be accessed just using the name of a class dot static name . . . example : Student9.change();
If you want to use non-static fields of a class, you must use a non-static method.
//Program of changing the common property of all objects(static field).
class Student9{
int rollno;
String name;
static String college = "ITS";
static void change(){
college = "BBDIT";
}
Student9(int r, String n){
rollno = r;
name = n;
}
void display (){System.out.println(rollno+" "+name+" "+college);}
public static void main(String args[]){
Student9.change();
Student9 s1 = new Student9 (111,"Indian");
Student9 s2 = new Student9 (222,"American");
Student9 s3 = new Student9 (333,"China");
s1.display();
s2.display();
s3.display();
} }
O/P: 111 Indian BBDIT
222 American BBDIT
333 China BBDIT

Static methods are not associated with an instance, so they can not access any non-static fields in the class.
You would use a static method if the method does not use any fields (or only static fields) of a class.
If any non-static fields of a class are used you must use a non-static method.

Static methods should be called on the Class, Instance methods should be called on the Instances of the Class. But what does that mean in reality? Here is a useful example:
A car class might have an instance method called Accelerate(). You can only Accelerate a car, if the car actually exists (has been constructed) and therefore this would be an instance method.
A car class might also have a count method called GetCarCount(). This would return the total number of cars created (or constructed). If no cars have been constructed, this method would return 0, but it should still be able to be called, and therefore it would have to be a static method.

Use a static method when you want to be able to access the method without an instance of the class.

Actually, we use static properties and methods in a class, when we want to use some part of our program should exists there until our program is running. And we know that, to manipulate static properties, we need static methods as they are not a part of instance variable. And without static methods, to manipulate static properties is time consuming.

Static:
Obj.someMethod
Use static when you want to provide class level access to a method, i.e. where the method should be callable without an instance of the class.

Static methods don't need to be invoked on the object and that is when you use it. Example: your Main() is a static and you don't create an object to call it.

Static methods and variables are controlled version of 'Global' functions and variables in Java. In which methods can be accessed as classname.methodName() or classInstanceName.methodName(), i.e. static methods and variables can be accessed using class name as well as instances of the class.
Class can't be declared as static(because it makes no sense. if a class is declared public, it can be accessed from anywhere), inner classes can be declared static.

Static methods can be used if
One does not want to perform an action on an instance (utility methods)
As mentioned in few of above answers in this post, converting miles to kilometers, or calculating temperature from Fahrenheit to Celsius and vice-versa. With these examples using static method, it does not need to instantiate whole new object in heap memory. Consider below
1. new ABCClass(double farenheit).convertFarenheitToCelcium()
2. ABCClass.convertFarenheitToCelcium(double farenheit)
the former creates a new class footprint for every method invoke, Performance, Practical. Examples are Math and Apache-Commons library StringUtils class below:
Math.random()
Math.sqrt(double)
Math.min(int, int)
StringUtils.isEmpty(String)
StringUtils.isBlank(String)
One wants to use as a simple function. Inputs are explictly passed, and getting the result data as return value. Inheritence, object instanciation does not come into picture. Concise, Readable.
NOTE:
Few folks argue against testability of static methods, but static methods can be tested too! With jMockit, one can mock static methods. Testability. Example below:
new MockUp<ClassName>() {
#Mock
public int doSomething(Input input1, Input input2){
return returnValue;
}
};

I found a nice description, when to use static methods:
There is no hard and fast, well written rules, to decide when to make a method static or not, But there are few observations based upon experience, which not only help to make a method static but also teaches when to use static method in Java. You should consider making a method static in Java :
If a method doesn't modify state of object, or not using any instance variables.
You want to call method without creating instance of that class.
A method is good candidate of being static, if it only work on arguments provided to it e.g. public int factorial(int number){}, this method only operate on number provided as argument.
Utility methods are also good candidate of being static e.g. StringUtils.isEmpty(String text), this a utility method to check if a String is empty or not.
If function of method will remain static across class hierarchy e.g. equals() method is not a good candidate of making static because every Class can redefine equality.
Source is here

Static methods are the methods in Java that can be called without creating an object of class. It is belong to the class.
We use static method when we no need to be invoked method using instance.

A static method has two main purposes:
For utility or helper methods that don't require any object state.
Since there is no need to access instance variables, having static
methods eliminates the need for the caller to instantiate the object
just to call the method.
For the state that is shared by all
instances of the class, like a counter. All instance must share the
same state. Methods that merely use that state should be static as
well.

You should use static methods whenever,
The code in the method is not dependent on instance creation and is
not using any instance variable.
A particular piece of code is to be shared by all the instance methods.
The definition of the method should not be changed or overridden.
you are writing utility classes that should not be changed.
https://www.tutorialspoint.com/When-to-use-static-methods-in-Java

In eclipse you can enable a warning which helps you detect potential static methods. (Above the highlighted line is another one I forgot to highlight)

I am wondering when to use static methods?
A common use for static methods is to access static fields.
But you can have static methods, without referencing static variables. Helper methods without referring static variable can be found in some java classes like java.lang.Math
public static int min(int a, int b) {
return (a <= b) ? a : b;
}
The other use case, I can think of these methods combined with synchronized method is implementation of class level locking in multi threaded environment.
Say if I have a class with a few getters and setters, a method or two, and I want those methods only to be invokable on an instance object of the class. Does this mean I should use a static method?
If you need to access method on an instance object of the class, your method should should be non static.
Oracle documentation page provides more details.
Not all combinations of instance and class variables and methods are allowed:
Instance methods can access instance variables and instance methods directly.
Instance methods can access class variables and class methods directly.
Class methods can access class variables and class methods directly.
Class methods cannot access instance variables or instance methods directly—they must use an object reference. Also, class methods cannot use the this keyword as there is no instance for this to refer to.

Whenever you do not want to create an object to call a method in your code just declare that method as static. Since the static method does not need an instance to be called with but the catch here is not all static methods are called by JVM automatically. This privilege is enjoyed only by the main() "public static void main[String... args]" method in java because at Runtime this is the method Signature public "static" void main[] sought by JVM as an entry point to start execution of the code.
Example:
public class Demo
{
public static void main(String... args)
{
Demo d = new Demo();
System.out.println("This static method is executed by JVM");
//Now to call the static method Displ() you can use the below methods:
Displ(); //By method name itself
Demo.Displ(); //By using class name//Recommended
d.Displ(); //By using instance //Not recommended
}
public static void Displ()
{
System.out.println("This static method needs to be called explicitly");
}
}
Output:-
This static method is executed by JVM
This static method needs to be called explicitly
This static method needs to be called explicitly
This static method needs to be called explicitly

The only reasonable place to use static methods are probably Math functions, and of course main() must be static, and maybe small factory-methods. But logic should not be kept in static methods.

Difference between a static and a final static variable in Java

Generally, final static members especially, variables (or static final of course, they can be used in either order without overlapping the meaning) are extensively used with interfaces in Java to define a protocol behavior for the implementing class which implies that the class that implements (inherits) an interface must incorporate all of the members of that interface.
I'm unable to differentiate between a final and a final static member. The final static member is the one which is a static member declared as final or something else? In which particular situations should they be used specifically?
A static variable or a final static variable can never be declared inside a method neither inside a static method nor inside an instance method. Why?
The following segment of code accordingly, will not be compiled and an compile-time error will be issued by the compiler, if an attempt is made to compile it.
public static void main(String args[])
{
final int a=0; //ok
int b=1; //ok
static int c=2; //wrong
final static int x=0; //wrong
}

You are making a huge mix of many different concepts. Even the question in the title does not correspond to the question in the body.
Anyways, these are the concepts you are mixing up:
variables
final variables
fields
final fields
static fields
final static fields
The keyword static makes sense only for fields, but in the code you show you are trying to use it inside a function, where you cannot declare fields (fields are members of classes; variables are declared in methods).
Let's try to rapidly describe them.
variables are declared in methods, and used as some kind of mutable local storage (int x; x = 5; x++)
final variables are also declared in methods, and are used as an immutable local storage (final int y; y = 0; y++; // won't compile). They are useful to catch bugs where someone would try to modify something that should not be modified. I personally make most of my local variables and methods parameters final. Also, they are necessary when you reference them from inner, anonymous classes. In some programming languages, the only kind of variable is an immutable variable (in other languages, the "default" kind of variable is the immutable variable) -- as an exercise, try to figure out how to write a loop that would run an specified number of times when you are not allowed to change anything after initialization! (try, for example, to solve fizzbuzz with only final variables!).
fields define the mutable state of objects, and are declared in classes (class x { int myField; }).
final fields define the immutable state of objects, are declared in classes and must be initialized before the constructor finishes (class x { final int myField = 5; }). They cannot be modified. They are very useful when doing multithreading, since they have special properties related to sharing objects among threads (you are guaranteed that every thread will see the correctly initialized value of an object's final fields, if the object is shared after the constructor has finished, and even if it is shared with data races). If you want another exercise, try to solve fizzbuzz again using only final fields, and no other fields, not any variables nor method parameters (obviously, you are allowed to declare parameters in constructors, but thats all!).
static fields are shared among all instances of any class. You can think of them as some kind of global mutable storage (class x { static int globalField = 5; }). The most trivial (and usually useless) example would be to count instances of an object (ie, class x { static int count = 0; x() { count++; } }, here the constructor increments the count each time it is called, ie, each time you create an instance of x with new x()). Beware that, unlike final fields, they are not inherently thread-safe; in other words, you will most certainly get a wrong count of instances of x with the code above if you are instantiating from different threads; to make it correct, you'd have to add some synchronization mechanism or use some specialized class for this purpose, but that is another question (actually, it might be the subject of a whole book).
final static fields are global constants (class MyConstants { public static final double PI = 3.1415926535897932384626433; }).
There are many other subtle characteristics (like: compilers are free to replace references to a final static field to their values directly, which makes reflection useless on such fields; final fields might actually be modified with reflection, but this is very error prone; and so on), but I'd say you have a long way to go before digging in further.
Finally, there are also other keywords that might be used with fields, like transient, volatile and the access levels (public, protected, private). But that is another question (actually, in case you want to ask about them, many other questions, I'd say).

Static members are those which can be accessed without creating an object. This means that those are class members and nothing to do with any instances. and hence can not be defined in the method.
Final in other terms, is a constant (as in C). You can have final variable inside the method as well as at class level. If you put final as static it becomes "a class member which is constant".

I'm unable to differentiate between a final and a final static member.
The final static member is the one which is a static member declared
as final or something else? In which particular situations should they
be used specifically?
Use a final static when you want it to be static. Use a final (non-static) when you don't want it to be static.
A static variable or a final static variable can never be declared
inside a method neither inside a static method nor inside an instance
method. Why?
Design decision. There's just no way to answer that without asking James Gosling.
The following segment of code accordingly, will not be compiled and an
compile-time error will be issued by the compiler, if an attempt is
made to compile it.
Because it violates the rule you just described.

final keyword simply means "this cannot be changed".It can be used with both fields and variables in a method.When a variable is declared final an attempt to change the variable will result to a compile-time error.For example if i declare a variable as final int x = 12; trying to increment x that is (++x) will produce an error.In short with primitives final makes a value a constant.
On the other hand static can only be applied with fields but not in methods.A field that is final static has only one piece of storage.final shows that it is a constant(cannot be changed), static shows it is only one.

In Java, a static variable is one that belongs to class rather than the object of a class, different instances of the same class will contain the same static variable value.
A final variable is one that once after initialized ,after the instantiation of a class (creation of an object) cannot be altered in the program. However this differ from objects if a different value is passed post creation of another object of the same class.
final static means that the variable belongs to the class as well as cannot be change once initialized. So it will be accessible to the same value throughout different instances of the same class.

Just to add a minor information to #Bruno Reis 's answer, which I sought to complete the answer, as he spoke about important condition to initialize final fields before constructor ends, final static fields must also be initialized before before static blocks' execution finishes.

You cannot declare static fields in static block, static fields can only belong to a class, hence the compiler error.

Parameterless methods/static

As my name suggests, I am a .NET developer but I have a growing interest in Java, and I am interested in learning more about other languages as this helps me to learn more about programming generally.
Anyway, my question is this: Methods which don't take parameters/work with state (which is just parameters in the method, correct me if I am wrong) are recommended to be made static. What is the relationship/link between static and parameterless methods? Not working with state means if you pass a Person object into the method, and you don't edit that object's state (Eg its properties) - this is my understanding.
I don't mind any Java specific answers.
Thanks

"What is the relationship/link between static and parameterless methods? "
None.
"Methods which don't take parameters/work with state... are recommended to be made static"
Really? By whom? Can you provide a link or quote?
Static means that the method belongs to the class -- as a whole -- not any specific object of that class. Therefore, static methods can only deal with static variables, not instance variables.
Parameterless doesn't mean anything. It may be that the method deals only with instance variables or only with static variables. Or it returns a constant. Or it has some calculation which is private to that method. It could, for example, create a socket, do a read using HTTP, and destroy the socket. No parameters; no instance variables.

There is no relationship between static and parameterless methods.
A static method is one which does not access instance state in the receiving class (and therefore does not need to be associated with a particular instance). It can easily take parameters:
public class Calculator
{
public static int Add(int a, int b) { return a + b; } // does not need any Calculator state
}
A static method can access its parameters (and can therefore modify their state if they allow it):
public class Officialdom
{
public static void Rename(Person person) { person.Name = "Bob"; } // does not need any Officialdom state
}
Conversely, a parameterless method might well need to access receiver state, and therefore be an instance (non-static) method:
public class Spline
{
private bool _isReticulated;
public void Reticulate()
{
_isReticulated = true; // does need Spline state
}
}
(I've posted code samples in C# because this is language-independent; the same notions and distinctions apply in Java, possibly with a few keyword changes.)

there is no connection between static methods and what they do with parameters passed into them. static methods are CLASS level methods and not INSTANCE level in Java. static methods are associated with the Class they are declared in and not instances of those classes.

There's a general principle that methods should not have access to more data than they need. This is one of the reasons why member variables are usually private and OO uses encapsulation to hide data and code from other parts of the system.
When you have a function which does not require access to the variables in that class, some people recommend making the method static.
Whether or not a function has parameters does not affect whether it has access to instance methods.

Develop Reference

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995.

What's the equivalent of C's "static" keyword in Java? - java

I want to know what could be the equivalent keyword in java which could perform same function as "Static keyword in C".. I want to do recursion in java, performing same function that a static keyword in C does... Please help..

The concept of static in Java doesn't adhere with the concept of static in C. However, there is a static keyword in Java as well. But its more like a static in C++ then C, with some differences.

Related

What's the benefit of using class name to access static methods and static variables in java instead of creating objects and calling them? [duplicate]

Java - Is it ok to instantiate class objects inside class? [duplicate]

Running a class method concurrently in multiple threads [duplicate]

Difference between a static and a final static variable in Java

Parameterless methods/static

Categories

Resources