Hibernate: fetching only the list of associated entities - java

I'm kind of lost in the woods at this point trying to optimize how Hibernate gets its data from the database. Here's the case:
I have a Person class that has a OneToMany association with the Address class. At the time of querying it is known from the application point of view that we're not going to need the Person instance but we'd like to have the list of that Person's Addresses.
The classes look more/less like this (getters/setters omitted):
#Entity
public class Person {
#Id
#GeneratedValue
private Long id;
#Column
private String firstName;
#Column
private String lastName;
#OneToMany(cascade = CascadeType.ALL)
#JoinColumn(name="address_id")
private Set<Address> addresses = new HashSet<Address>();
//...
}
#Entity
public class Address {
#Id
#GeneratedValue
private Long id;
#Column
private String city;
#Column
private String street;
//...
}
Now what I'd like to achieve is a criteria query (I have all the other parts of the system already using Criteria API and I'd very much like to keep it consistent) that'll return addresses belonging to a given person.

Criteria is the limiting factor here: it only allows to select the root entity, or scalars. And since you don't have the reverse association (from address to person), it's not possible to do it in a simple way with Criteria.
I find HQL much more flexible, and much more readable as well. Criteria is useful when a query must be dynamically composed, but in this case, using a HQL query is straightforward:
select a from Person p inner join p.addresses a where p.id = :personId
It's actually doable in Criteria, but it would need a query which is less efficient and straightforward: something like
select a from Address a where a.id in (select a2.id from Person p inner join p.addresses a2 where p.id = :personId)
translated in Criteria.
That would be:
Criteria criteria = session.createCriteria(Address.class, "a");
DetachedCriteria dc = DetachedCriteria.forClass(Person.class, "p");
dc.createAlias("p.addresses", "a2");
dc.add(Restrictions.eq("p.id", personId);
dc.setProjection(Projections.property("a2.id"));
criteria.add(Subqueries.propertyIn("a.id", dc));
As you see: less readable, much longer, and less efficient.

Related

List of entity inside a hibernate entity with #NamedNativeQueries

I have a situation where i get List of entity in hiberate, But inside the main entity i have another entity list. The entities that i use:
EmpListBean.java
#NamedNativeQueries({
#NamedNativeQuery(
name = "EmpList",
//Actual query involves lot of joins
query = " SELECT ID , NAME FROM EMPLOYEE WHERE EMP_ID=:EMPID"
,resultClass = EmpListBean.class
)
})
#Entity
public class EmpListBean {
#Column(name = "ID")
private int id;
#Column(name = "NAME")
private String empName;
// This is the list i need to retreive
#ManyToOne
#Column(name="workList")
private List<WorkListBean> workList;
//Getters & Setters
}
WorkListBean.java
#NamedNativeQueries({
#NamedNativeQuery(
name = "WorkListBeanList",
query = " SELECT ID , NAME FROM Work_List WHERE EMP_ID=:EMPID"
,resultClass = WorkListBean.class
)
})
#Entity
public class WorkListBean {
#Column(name = "ID")
private int id;
#Column(name = "NAME")
private String workName;
//Getters & Setters
}
The DAO Layer
Query query = session.getNamedQuery("EmpList");
query.setParameter("EMPID", myObj.getEmpId());
List<EmpListBean> oEmpListBean = query.list();
When executing below DAO layer code I get the "workList" Object as empty , I know this can be achieved by iterating the EmpListBean separately and calling named query for WorkListBean separately , but since the data is huge it takes too much time when doing that way, So wanted to know if there is any way that we could fetch WorkListBean inside EmpList Bean. The two entities used here are only for reference , the actual query i use is complex and could not reveal in this forum and it involves lot of table joins, So kindly let me know how this can be possible in hibernate.
I know this can be achieved by iterating the EmpListBean separately and calling named query for WorkListBean separately , but since the data is huge it takes too much time when doing that way
I understand you want to merge the two queries to include the data for both entities, then?
Once the association between EmpListBean and WorkListBean is properly defined, i.e. you have:
class EmpListBean {
...
#OneToMany
#JoinColumn(name = "EMP_ID")
private List<WorkListBean> workList;
}
you should be able to use the following approach:
session.createNativeQuery(
"SELECT employee.* FROM EMPLOYEE employee JOIN Work_List wl JOIN ... WHERE wl.EMP_ID=emp.id AND employee.EMP_ID=:EMPID AND ..." )
.addEntity("employee", EmpListBean.class )
.addJoin( "wl", "employee.workList")
.setResultTransformer( Criteria.ROOT_ENTITY )
.list();
Not sure if it works for named native queries, though, you'll need to check.
As commented by #Javalerner you should use #OneTomany and add Eager Loading with fetch="FetchType.EAGER"
and remove the Column annotation
#OneToMany(fetch = FetchType.EAGER)
private List<WorkListBean> workList;
I like Abd's response if you're looking for a simple #OneToMany.
Rather than forcing the bean to always eager load, you may want to just incorporate this concept into your NamedNative query using the FETCH JOIN style. Using this approach you can craft queries that are EAGER on an object whose association is otherwise Lazy. In that case, Hibernate will only eagerly fetch via your query and generally be lazy, which is I think what most people want.
Feel free to google around. Here is a well written article that may start you off.
http://www.basilv.com/psd/blog/2008/improving-performance-via-eager-fetching-in-hibernate
Best of luck!
to get whatever FetchType.LAZY is, you have to use JOIN FETCH in the sentence. When you use JOIN you get all whatever FetchType.EAGER is but not whatever FetchType.LAZY is
EmpListBean.java
#OneToMany(fetch = FetchType.LAZY, mappedBy="empListBean")
private List<WorkListBean> workList;
WorkListBean.java
#ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
#JoinColumn(name="EMP_ID")
private EmpListBean empListBean;
DAO
String hql = "SELECT empListBean "
+ "FROM EmpListBean empListBean "
+ "JOIN FETCH empListBean.workList workList "
+ "WHERE empListBean.id = :EMPID";
Query q = sessionFactory.getCurrentSession().createQuery(hql);
q.setParameter("EMPID", myObj.getEmpId());
List<EmpListBean> empListBean = query.list();

Hibernate criteria using left join to filter results

JSF application with hibernate
Is there a way to use a join to filter the results returned by criteria list?
Example: i have 2 tables. orders and customers.
#Entity(name = "order")
public class Order
{
#Id
private int id;
private String billingCustomerId;
private String shippingCustomerId;
private Date orderDate;
....
}
#Entity(name = "customer")
public class Customer
{
#Id
private String id;
private String name;
private String emailAddress
....
}
I need to return all orders for customers that are missing an email address and all orders that the order.billingCustomerId = null and order.shippingCustomerId = null.
The customer could match on the billingCustomerId or shippingCustomerId.
The SQL I would use
select o.* from order as o
LEFT join customer as c1 on o.billingCustomerId = c1.id
LEFT join customer as c2 on o.shippingCustomerId= c2.id
where (o.billingCustomerId is null and o.shippingCustomerId is null) or
(o.billingCustomerId is not null and c1.emailAddress is null) or
(o.shippingCustomerIdis not null and c2.emailAddress is null)
Hibernate Criteria
Criteria criteria1 = session.createCriteria(Order.class);
criteria.add(Restrictions.and(Restrictions.isNull("billingCustomerId"),
Restrictions.isNull("shippingCustomerId"));
List<Order> = criteria.list();
This will return the list of orders that billing /shipping customer = null.
How can i change the criteria to also include the orders for customers with missing email addresses?
Disjunction disjunciton = Restrictions.disjunction();
Criteria criteria = session.createCriteria(Order.class);
disjunciton.add(Restrictions.and(Restrictions.isNull("billingCustomerId"),
Restrictions.isNull("shippingCustomerId")));
disjunciton.add(...
...)
criteria.add(disjunciton);
List<Order> = criteria.list();
I have not been able to find examples of joining on a column, but only where the table have a common key.
I asked this question: Hibernate trouble getting composite key to work and discovered Hibernate can only create a join on columns that were created by relating 2 objects. I am going to add more to my answer to give more useful information but the best alternative you your case is to do a Session.createSQLQuery() using the query you showed above. Then before running the query put Query.addEntity(Order.class).addEntity(Customer.class). As long as your query returns the correct rows to fill out the Java objects correctly, Hibernate can populate them automatically. If that doesn't work you can still retrieve the data and populate it manually yourself.

Implementing hierarchical data structures with JPA (fixed depth)

I have a hierarchical data structure with a fixed depth of 4. For a better understanding, let's assume the following (just an example):
The "root" level is called countries
Each country contains an arbitrary amount of states
Each state countains an arbitrary amount of counties
Each county contains an arbitrary amount of cities
So there are always 1-N relationships between the levels.
A very important usecase (given the id of a country) is to load the whole "content" of a country at once with the smallest possible impact on the performance of the database.
In a first naive approach, I created 4 entitiy classes in Java where the entity "Country" contains a list of the type "State", the entity "State" contains a list of the type "County" and so on...
But what JPA creates afterwards are of course not 4 tables, but 7 (4 for the entities + 3 for the connection between the levels due to 1-N). I don't know if this is a good solution since there is a lot of joining going on under the hood.
I also tried to map the subtypes to their parent types (a city belongs to one county, a county belongs to one state, a state belongs to one country). This results in 4 tables, but makes it more difficult to retrieve all data at once from the application's point of view. If I'm not wrong, I would need 4 different requests instead of one.
How could I solve this problem? Is there a way to combine a simple table layout (with four tables, not seven) with easy to use entity classes (a parent type should know its children)?
If not, how would you realize this?
I'm using JPA with Hibernate and PostgreSQL.
You can avoid the 3 extra mapping tables by using the #JoinColumn annotation rather than the #JoinTable annotation that I suspect you are using.
So for example:
COUNTRY
#OneToMany(cascade = CascadeType.ALL, fetch = FetchType.EAGER, mappedBy="country")
private List<State> stateList;
STATE
#ManyToOne
#JoinColumn(name="country_id")
private Country country
The database tables would be as follows:
Country
country_id => primary key
State
state_id => primary key
country_id => foreign key
This way the mapping tables between all the 4 entities can be avoided.
You can achieve this pretty easily using JPQL:
SELECT DISTINCT country
FROM Country country
JOIN FETCH country.states states
JOIN FETCH states.counties counties
JOIN FETCH counties.cities cities
WHERE country.id = :countryId
Using fetchType = FetchType.EAGER on #OneToMany/#ManyToOne(believe that one is already EAGER by default) will achieve similar results.
It's very simple use bidirectional mapping. Go through that link
How to delete Child or Parent objects from Relationship?
Make some changes like below
Country Entity:
------
#OneToMany(mappedBy="Country ",cascade = CascadeType.ALL)
private List<States > states;
#OneToMany(mappedBy="Country ",cascade = CascadeType.ALL)
private List<Counties> counties;
#OneToMany(mappedBy="Country ",cascade = CascadeType.ALL)
private List<Cities> cities;
-------
setters & getters
States Entity:
-----
#ManyToOne(cascade=CascadeType.ALL, fetch=FetchType.EAGER)
#JoinColumn(name="countryId")
private Country country ;
-----
Counties Entity:
--------
#ManyToOne(cascade=CascadeType.ALL, fetch=FetchType.EAGER)
#JoinColumn(name="countryId")
private Country country ;
-------
Cities Entity:
#ManyToOne(cascade=CascadeType.ALL, fetch=FetchType.EAGER)
#JoinColumn(name="countryId")
private Country country ;
---------
After compilation of all entity's do your insertion . Only 4 will create and read your data by using Country object id.
You already have the solution: four table is the way to go, with bidirectional relationships (use the mappedBy property in the not-owning side of every relationship). If the relationships are EAGER-fetched, than all entities are automatically loaded. If you want to use LAZY fetching, you could try a named query in order to load the entity with all relationships loaded:
SELECT DISTINCT c FROM Country c LEFT JOIN FETCH c.states s LEFT JOIN FETCH s.counties co...
Did you try to declare the fetch type of the relations explicitely to eager with your second approach (default is lazy, that's why you have to do four queries).
E.g.
#OneToMany(cascade=CascadeType.ALL, fetch=FetchType.EAGER)
#JoinColumn ...
private ...;
see here: http://www.concretepage.com/hibernate/fetch_hibernate_annotation
Here is how your entities will look like:(You can use EAGER Loading instead of LAZY as well if you want)
Entity: Country
#Id
private Integer id;
#OneToMany(orphanRemoval=true fetch=FetchType.LAZY)
#JoinColumn(name="COUNTRY_ID")
private List<State> stateList;
Entity: State
This table has COUNTRY_ID that is Foreign Key to Country
#Id
private Integer id;
#OneToMany(orphanRemoval=true fetch=FetchType.LAZY)
#JoinColumn(name="STATE_ID")
private List<County> countyList;
#Column(name="COUNTRY_ID")
private Integer countryId;
Entity: County
This table has STATE_ID that is Foreign Key to State
#Id
private Integer id;
#OneToMany(orphanRemoval=true fetch=FetchType.LAZY)
#JoinColumn(name="COUNTY_ID")
private List<City> cityList;
#Column(name="STATE_ID")
private Integer stateId;
Entity: City
This table has COUNTY_ID that is Foreign Key to County
#Id
private Integer id;
#Column(name="COUNTY_ID")
private Integer countyId;
Your JPQL will be:
Select o from Country o where o.id=10
This will pick The Country Entity along with all the mappings like below.
Country
Holding List of States
Each States Holding List of Counties
Each Counties Holding LIst of Cities
For a requirement like yours, I would suggest to have a tree-like structure to maintain the hierarchical location data. It is relatively easy to implement & maintain and is more scalable & extensible.
In order to implement tree you need to have 2 tables LOCATION_NODE (Location ID, Location Name, Location Type[country, state, county, city]) & LOCATION_REL (Relation ID, Parent ID, Child ID). Below is the basic implementation of the tree idea.
public class LocationRel<T> {
private LocationNode<T> root;
public LocationRel(T rootData) {
root = new LocationNode<T>();
root.data = rootData;
root.children = new ArrayList<LocationNode<T>>();
}
public static class LocationNode<T> {
private T data;
private LocationNode<T> parent;
private List<LocationNode<T>> children;
}
}
This is the basic building block for a tree. You may need to add methods for add to, removing from, traversing, and constructors. But, once implemented, you have the freedom to add any new location type, change the hierarchy, add node, delete node etc with your hierarchical data.
Think out of the box.
Shishir
If you need the performance, I would suggest to de-normalize your tables and create 4 entities with following attributes (columns):
Country: id, name
State: id, countryId, name
County: id, countryId, stateId, name
City: id, countryId, stateId, countyId, name
(mapping is obvious)
Then you will be able to build a simple SQL queries.
If you need performance, prefer named queries as they are compiled at initialization time.
E.g. select all cities by country: "SELECT id, name FROM city WHERE country_id=?"
You may even not declare a references between entities using #ManyToOne, but just declare a simple #Columns. API call will, most likely, accept IDs (countryId, stateId), so you'll be better to pass that IDs as parameters to DAO. Most likely, you have a locations tables filled in once by sql script and the data should not be modified. Create foreign keys to guarantee data integrity.
And do you really need a tree-like structure in memory? If so, create it by hand, it is not very complex.
Searching Online, I found a couple of Links on JPQL which I think might help.
Link 1
Link 2
Anyways,
JPQL is one of the best ways to achieve this, try out this Query
SELECT DISTINCT country FROM Country country JOIN FETCH country.states states JOIN FETCH states.counties counties JOIN FETCH counties.cities cities WHERE country.id = :countryId
A solution that is useful, if you have relations that point to their parent only is the following:
With records:
#Entity
public class Country
{
#Id
private Long id;
}
#Entity
public class State
{
#Id
private Long id;
#ManyToOne(optional = false)
#JoinColumn(name = "country_id", referencedColumnName = "id", nullable = false)
Country country;
}
#Entity
public class County
{
#Id
private Long id;
#ManyToOne(optional = false)
#JoinColumn(name = "state_id", referencedColumnName = "id", nullable = false)
State state;
}
#Entity
public class City
{
#Id
private Long id;
#ManyToOne(optional = false)
#JoinColumn(name = "county_id", referencedColumnName = "id", nullable = false)
County county;
}
You can get all cities of a country with:
public interface CityRepository extends JpaRepository<City, Long>
{
List<City> findByCounty(County county); // county is a direct field of City
#Query("SELECT c FROM City c WHERE c.county.state.country = ?1")
List<City> findByCountry(Country country);
}

Hibernate Criteria Join problem

I have a 2 classes that share a UUID and are uni-directionally mapped. I use the UUID to group related rows, and this group shares many details (this is just an example):
#Entity #Table
class Something {
#Id #Column("something_id")
private Long id;
private String uuid = UUID.randomUUID().toString();
#OneToMany
#JoinColumn("uuid")
private List<Detail> details = new LinkedList<Detail>();
}
#Entity #Table
class Detail {
#Id #Column("detail_id")
private Long id;
private String value;
private String uuid;
}
I'm attempting to use Criteria:
Criteria c = getSession().createCriteria(Something.class).createAlias("details", "detail").add(Restrictions.eq("detail.value", someValue));
This is all fine and dandy, but I'm not getting results because of the join:
inner join DETAIL d1_ on this_.SOMETHING_ID=d1_.UUID
Is it possible to specify:
inner join DETAIL d1 on this_.UUID=d1.UUID
I would have expected the join to use the #JoinColumn annotaiton to find the column to join on. I see that I can specify a join type, but I don't see a way to specify the actual column.
I would have expected the join to use the #JoinColumn annotation to find the column to join on. I see that I can specify a join type, but I don't see a way to specify the actual column.
The join is using the JoinColumn annotation since it's joining on d1_.UUID. However, because you didn't specify the referencedColumnName element, the foreign key is assumed to refer to the primary key of the referenced table (this_.SOMETHING_ID), hence the obtained result.
In other words, try this:
#OneToMany
#JoinColumn(name="uuid", referencedColumnName="uuid")
private List<Detail> details = new LinkedList<Detail>();
I'm not sure to understand the benefit but let's say it's another story.

Hibernate: Query entities which contain a specified element in a CollectionOfElements?

Let's say I have this entity (for Hibernate):
#Entity
public class Person {
#Id
#GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.AUTO)
Long id;
#CollectionOfElements
#IndexColumn("phones_index")
Set<String> phones;
}
For example, I want to get instances of Person where their phones contain "555-1234".
How can I do a query on this? I am looking for something similar to:
session.createCriteria(Person.class)./*something*/.add(Restrictions./*something*/"555-1234").list();
Hi you can try this one
String phone = "555-1234";
Person person= (Person) session.createQuery("from Person p join p.phones pl where pl = :phone").setString("phone", phone).uniqueResult();
I think you want Hibernate's Restrictions.in() method, which takes a property name as the first argument, and either an array or Collection of objects as the second.
See also: The Javadoc
Edit: Upon re-reading your question, I think you can use any of the relevant Restrictions methods, in particular, eq:
session.createCriteria(Person.class).add(Restrictions.eq("phones", "555-1234")).list();

Categories

Resources