Java Not Catching Exception - java

Unfortunately, I don't have control over getUserByUserId(String). The way it behaves is to return a User if a user if found and to throw a OntNoObjectExistsException if no user is found. My problem is that for some reason, the catch doesn't catch OntNoObjectExistsException when it gets thrown.
The type hierarchy for this exception is: OntNoObjectExistsException -> OntException -> Exception -> Throwable.
public boolean isUserIdAvailable(String userId) {
try {
return super.getUserByUserId(userId) == null;
} catch (OntNoObjectExistsException e){
return true;
} catch (Exception ex) {
appLog.error(ex.getMessage());
}
return false;
}
I tried this code to test the waters and the problem persisted. Note, I'm catching Throwable.
public boolean isUserIdAvailable(String userId) {
try {
return super.getUserByUserId(userId) == null;
} catch (Throwable ex) {
appLog.error(ex.getMessage());
}
return false;
}
Here's the stacktrace:
com.opennetwork.exception.OntNoObjectExistsException: User not found
at com.bcbst.dsmart.api.WebUser.getUserByUserId(WebUser.java:411)
at com.bcbst.dsmart.api.WebProspectiveMemberBean.isUserIdAvailable(WebProspectiveMemberBean.java:71)
at com.bcbst.dsmart.api.EJSLocalStatelessWebProspectiveMember_ce00ef7b.isUserIdAvailable(EJSLocalStatelessWebProspectiveMember_ce00ef7b.java:120)
at com.bcbst.prospectivememberweb.actions.UsageagreementAction.execute(UsageagreementAction.java:61)
at org.apache.struts.action.RequestProcessor.processActionPerform(RequestProcessor.java:484)
at org.apache.struts.action.RequestProcessor.process(RequestProcessor.java:274)
at org.apache.struts.action.ActionServlet.process(ActionServlet.java:1482)
at org.apache.struts.action.ActionServlet.doPost(ActionServlet.java:525)
Also note, this is java 1.4. Something else I can't control right now.

Let me propose a hypothesis. WebUser.getUserByUserId contains this code:
if (userNotFoundCondition) {
OntNoObjectExistsException e = new OntNoObjectExistsException("User not found");
logger.error("User not found", e);
throw e;
}
This hypothesis is 100% consistent with all the evidence you submitted. In order to move forward with your investigation, you must first disprove this hypothesis.

I agree with the the other answer that it is very bad practice to use exceptions for flow control but to actually answer your question have you tried to catch Throwable instead of Exception?
catch (Throwable t) {
// handle here.
}

You are catching exception in the superclass where you throw new Throwable.

You have no control over getUserByUserId(); however, it seems to be in the same package com.bcbst.dsmart.api, so this answer assumes (so as to move on) it is outside your responsibility within the same project, but you have its source files.
Could there be a mismatch between the sources of the class getUserByUserId() belongs to, and the compiled version that's being used at runtime?
If the throws statements have been modified within that class after they have been compiled, or the exceptions themselves have been changed, this could explain this apparently absurd situation of yours.
See this answer on SO for more on that hypothesis.
=> Recompile everything, and redeploy.

Related

Android unreported exception IOException error

I am new to android apps development. Recently,Im writing an application which able to show public ip based on Ipify. So far, i already:
Download the required jar file and put inside libs folder
I also compile file within gradle
Then i import required class it to my class
How to use Ipify, according to its website:
import org.ipify.Ipify;
public class HelloIP {
public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException {
System.out.println(Ipify.getPublicIp());
}
}
I write the following method to be invoked from another class:
public static String getPublicIp() throws IOException{
String ip = Ipify.getPublicIp();
return ip;
}
Another Class
//Get wifi
getWifiName wifiInfo = new getWifiName();
String myIP = wifiInfo.getPublicIp();
However, i keep getting:
Error:(52, 43) error: unreported exception IOException; must be caught
or declared to be thrown
I tried to modify the code and use the following try and catch, but still got the same error.
public static String getPublicIp() throws IOException{
String myip = Ipify.getPublicIp();
try{
return myip;
}
catch (IOException e){
System.out.println("General I/O exception: " + e.getMessage());
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
Im not too good in catch and throw exception, and already spent the whole day for this.I dont have idea anymore to fix this error..T.T
public static String getPublicIp() {
try{
return Ipify.getPublicIp();
}catch (IOException e){
System.out.println("General I/O exception: " + e.getMessage());
e.printStackTrace();
}
return null;
}
In case it didn't help, clean project in your IDE. You may have some data cached and it might be a reason.
Your problem is in another class! As you have declared the method getPublicIp() to throw IOException that class is afraid of receiving the Exception and therefor requests catching it.
In Java you have two types of Exceptions. Checked and unchecked. Checked Exceptions must be caught.
In Java Exceptions are used for marking unexpected situations. For example parsing non-numeric String to a number (NumberFormatException) or calling a method on a null reference (NullPointerException). You can catch them in many ways.
Unchecked Exceptions are those which extend RunTimeException. They are used for marking unexpected states usually caused by user's input. They shouldn't cause harm and should be worked out with business logic. You don't have to catch them, but sometimes you should.
On the other hand there are Checked Exceptions which mark dangerous situations. For example the application being unable to open a file. As those situations are found dangerous, you must catch them.
try{
//some code
} catch (NumberFormatException e1) {
e.printStackTrace() //very important - handles the Exception but prints the information!
} catch (NullPointerException e2) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
or using the fact, that they all extend Exception:
try {
//somecode
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace;
};
or since Java 7:
try {
//somecode
} catch (NullPointerException | NumberFormatException e) {
e.printStackTrace;
};

How to handle a PSQLException in java?

I have a unique constraint on one of my entities and whenever I get a PSQLException which occurs whenever that constraint is violated, I want to respond with a bad request.
This is my exception handler which I tried to implement:
#ControllerAdvice
public class DatabaseExceptionHandler {
#ExceptionHandler(value = PSQLException.class)
#ResponseStatus(HttpStatus.BAD_REQUEST)
public void handleDatabaseExceptions(PSQLException e) {
// i want to respond with a bad request only when this condition is satisfied
//
// if (e.getSQLState().equals("23505")) {
//
// }
}
}
And this is where the model is saved in db:
public DepartmentForHoliday setDepartment(DepartmentForHoliday department) {
if (department.getDepartmentId() == null) {
Department savedDepartment = new Department();
savedDepartment.setName(department.getName());
try {
departmentRepository.save(savedDepartment);
} catch (PSQLException e) {
/*here i have a compiler error which says that this exception is never thrown in the corresponding try block, but where ?*/
}
}
This is the exception that is thrown when I add a duplicate entry:
org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: ERROR: duplicate key value violates unique constraint "uk_1t68827l97cwyxo9r1u6t4p7d"
Detail: Key (name)=(Tech) already exists.
at org.postgresql.core.v3.QueryExecutorImpl.receiveErrorResponse(QueryExecutorImpl.java:2458) ~[postgresql-9.4.1211.jre7.jar:9.4.1211.jre7]
How to handle PSQLExceptions ? Should I make my own exception as a wrapper or how to solve this problem ?
Key problem is that PSQLException is wrapped into some Spring exception (which I assume from your code); you have to unwrap it (for example using guava's Throwables):
public DepartmentForHoliday setDepartment(DepartmentForHoliday department) {
if (department.getDepartmentId() == null) {
Department savedDepartment = new Department();
savedDepartment.setName(department.getName());
try {
departmentRepository.save(savedDepartment);
} catch (RuntimeException e) {
Throwable rootCause = com.google.common.base.Throwables.getRootCause(e);
if (rootCause instanceof SQLException) {
if ("23505".equals(((SQLException) rootCause).getSQLState())) {
// do smth interesting :)
}
}
}
}
}
Once you do that you can throw your custom exception and handle it in DatabaseExceptionHandler
You are catching PSQLException. Instead of that, please catch SQLException. With SQLException you will can handle all this SQL exceptions.
You can check the SQLException knowledge at this link
Then in your code just treat the SQLException as you want. The most generic catch clause is the following one:
catch (SQLException e)
{
System.out.println("ERROR: Fetch statement failed: " +
e.getMessage());
}
With this code you are printing the exception. If you want more information, check this
This is quite late, but building on previous responses I was able to solve it as so:
try {
return this.projectRepository.saveAndFlush(patchedProjectEntity);
} catch (DataIntegrityViolationException e) {
if (e.getMostSpecificCause().getClass().getName().equals("org.postgresql.util.PSQLException") && ((SQLException) e.getMostSpecificCause()).getSQLState().equals("23505"))
throw new UniqueConstraintViolationException("", e.getMostSpecificCause());
throw e;
}
Where UniqueConstraintViolationException is a custom exception and handled with a spring controller advice.
You might as well register an exception handler for that wrapped exception (that #radek mentioned) directly.
In your case that's:
#ExceptionHandler(DataIntegrityViolationException::class)
protected fun handleDataIntegrityException(ex: DataIntegrityViolationException, request: WebRequest) : ResponseEntity<SomeBody>{
return ResponseEntity.badRequest().body(someBodyHere)
}
The error is converted within convertHibernateAccessException in org.springframework.orm.jpa.vendorHibernateJpaDialect, which has already processed away from PSQL. You can add a breakpoint there and follow the stacktrace.
There is a lot of proxy'ing happening under the hood, but the takeaway is that there is always a readable, expressive Exception to use directly.

Throwing exceptions through components, good practice?

When a sub method throws an exception, would encapsulation in a dedicated "package" exception be considered good pratice ?
public String doStuff() throws UtilsException {
try {
throw new NullPointerException("test");
} catch (NullPointerException e) {
throw new UtilsException("something occured", e);
}
}
//use this exception for all classes of this package / component
public class UtilsException extends Exception {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
public UtilsException() {
super();
}
public UtilsException(String message, Throwable cause) {
super(message, cause);
}
public UtilsException(String message) {
super(message);
}
public UtilsException(Throwable cause) {
super(cause);
}
}
Could Optional.empty() be an alternative to avoid throwing/catching of a complex app?
public Optional<String> doStuff() throws UtilsException {
try {
return Optional.of("ok");
} catch (NullPointerException e) {
LOG.error("Something append... {}", e.getMessage());
return Optional.empty();
}
}
First, you should never catch a NullPointerException (or runtime exceptions in general) an return someting else like you are doing.
Ok, maybe there are a very few cases where you need to do that (like a buggy third party api).
Exceptions like those (NullPointer, ClassCast, IllegalArgument, ect) happen when your program has a bug and you should let
them bubble up and handle them in some high order component of your program.
That being said, (and there comes the infamous phrase) it depends...
Exceptions are "responsible" for informing errors,thus they need to be informative for the caller will use them to decide what to do. Consider the following:
public void readFile(String path) throws IOException {
// read file content
return content;
}
try {
return readFile("foo.txt");
} catch(FileNotFound e) {
// For this specific scenario not finding the file is not a problem
return "";
} catch(IOException e) {
// This we are not expecting to happen, if the file exists we should be
// able to read it, otherwise we should inform the user.
log.error(e);
display("We had a problem reading the file, Check the file permissions and try again");
}
As you can see in the example above, you won't want to wrap the IOException in another exception in this case
because you will remove the client's ability to decide what to do when an error happened.
Also, note that the IOException is a form of "wrap" since exceptions are objects too you can use inheritance
to generalize what kind of errors your method throws and then throw more specific errors so the caller can
decide what to do.
When to wrap.
There are cases when wrapping exceptions is a good practice and is the way to go.
For example, if you are creating a lib whose main functionality is to get weather information.
For the first version you kept it simple and used a third party api to get the values for the day.
The main method of your api looks like this.
public Weather getWeather(Date day) throws HTTPException {
return weather.get(day);
}
Your api is doing pretty well but you noticed you're doing too much requests to the weather api and
you will have to start paying for it very soon. You then decided to cache the results in a database table
so you can reduce the amount of requests.
public Weather getWeather(Date day) throws HTTPException, SQLException {
Weather w = getFromCache(day);
if (w != null) {
return w;
} else {
return getAndCache(day);
}
}
Now you have a problem, you can't add this new exception to the throws statement because you will most certainly break
your api's users code.
And if you think about it, your api's users are no interested if you had problems getting the data from the wheter api or
from your cache, they just want to be informed of errors. This is a very good case to wrap those exceptions in
a more generic one, like WeatherFetchException.
As you can see, it really depends...
The rule of thumb to me is, keep your exceptions meaningful and if you want to wrap them, do only when
it makes sense and when it doesn't remove the caller's ability to handle errors.
Wrapping exceptions just for the sake of it is most definitely not a good practice.

Using specific try catch, error overrides

This is my Exception:
public class MyException extends Exception {
private String errorCode="Unknown_Exception";
public MyException(String message, String errorCode){
super(message);
this.errorCode=errorCode;
}
public String getErrorCode(){
return this.errorCode;
}
}
Now immagine the next scenario, the code is way too long to paste here:
1 I got a Presentation class made in Swing in Presentation package
2 In package calculations I made simple operations with few numbers from received database fields
3 In package connections I got the database connections
Trouble comes here:
-In presentation layer I catch all errors, like this:
try {
//here is a method called updateCombo() wich throws:
//throw new MyException(e.getMessage(),"ERROR_UPDATING_COMBO_BOX");
} catch (MyException ex) {
try {
//Here we process error code, if error is not defined, uses default errors.
processCode(ex);
} catch (MyException ex1) {
Logger.getLogger(Presentacion.class.getName()).log(Level.SEVERE, null, ex1);
}
}
processCode is a simple list with cases, like this:
private void processCode(MyException e) throws MyException {
switch (e.getErrorCode()) {
case "ERROR_UPDATING_COMBO_BOX":
lblErrorText.setText("Error updating combo.");
throw e;
case "ERROR_SELECTING_PRIMARY_KEY":
lblErrorText.setText("Error selecting PK");
throw e;
case "ERROR_OPENING_CONNECTION":
lblErrorText.setText("Error opening connection.");
throw e;
default:
lblErrorText.setText("Excepcion not defined: "+ e.getMessage());
e.printStackTrace();
}
This is the scenario, the connection fails in 3rd package and leads to this:
throw new MyException(e.getMessage(),"ERROR_OPENING_CONNECTION");
As I said, the error is thrown to the upper layer with throws clause in method header, this beeing 2nd package.
2nd package also throws a new exception to Presentation, because of failing connection:
throw new MyException(e.getMessage(),"ERROR_SELECTING_PRIMARY_KEY");
Presentation methods also throw this exception becase 2nd layer failed:
throw new MyException(e.getMessage(),"ERROR_UPDATING_COMBO_BOX");
The main problem:
Using debug i found out that the program does what it has to do. It gets to the connection layer and does this successfully:
throw new MyException(e.getMessage(),"ERROR_OPENING_CONNECTION");
But, in 2nd layer, calculations, if connection fails it throws a new exception:
throw new MyException(e.getMessage(),"ERROR_SELECTING_PRIMARY_KEY");
This is the problem:
throw new
throwing new exception overrides ERROR_OPENING_CONNECTION with ERROR_SELECTING_PRIMARY_KEY. When it gets to presentation due to its "throw new" overrides ERROR_SELECTING_PRIMARY_KEY with ERROR_UPDATING_COMBO_BOX, resulting in the final error shown in the screen:
lblErrorText.setText("Error updating combo.");
Is there any way to return to presentation once first error is caught without overriding by next errors?
Maybe I misunderstood the concept but I want to catch all possible errors because:
-If connection is OK but method in 2nd layer fails it should throw ERROR_SELECTING_PRIMARY_KEY.
-If 2nd layer (calculations) does it OK but there is error in presentation it should lead to ERROR_UPDATING_COMBO_BOX.
You can use e.getCause() which will return a Throwable and check if this cause belongs to MyException. In case it is, you can check the e.getCause() again recursively until you obtain the deepest error code in the stacktrace and perform the validation for this exception.
Here's an example:
public MyException getDeepestException(MyException e) {
Throwable t = e.getCause();
if (t instanceof MyException) {
return getDeepestException((MyException)t);
}
return e;
}
As pointed out by #RealSkeptic, in order to use this approach, you will need to add an additional constructor to your custom exception:
public MyException(String message, Throwable cause, String errorCode){
super(message, cause);
this.errorCode = errorCode;
}
And when throwing your exception, call the proper constructor:
try {
//...
} catch (SomeException e) {
throw new MyException(<a proper message should be here>, e, "ERROR_SELECTING_PRIMARY_KEY");
}
If I understand you correctly, if the exception caught by one package happens to be a MyException, you want the original MyException to be passed up, otherwise (if the exception is some other type of Exception) you want to create a new MyException.
In this case, you should have two catch clauses.
try {
// Whatever you do in the try clause
} catch ( MyException myEx ) {
throw myEx;
} catch ( Exception e ) {
throw new MyException(e.getMessage(),"ERROR_SELECTING_PRIMARY_KEY");
}

correctly printstacktrace of servlet exception

so i am using a filter to catch servlet exception (because we are using a mix of jsf/plain servlets)
when catching the ServletException and calling printstacktrace most of the information is lost.
the "true" root exception seems to be hidden behind the "funny" expression
((ServletException) e.getRootCause().getCause()).getRootCause().getCause().getCause().getCause()
this is clearly not the way to do it.
is the an easy way to print the "full" information of such an exception.
can someone explain me why the exception is wrapped this way?
Take a look at the ExceptionUtils class from commons-lang. It contains several useful methods for printing the entire chain of exceptions.
after i had a look at ExceptionUtils, this solved the problem!
final StringWriter stacktrace = new StringWriter();
ExceptionUtils.printRootCauseStackTrace(throwable,new PrintWriter(stacktrace));
msg.append(stacktrace.getBuffer());
this prints out the full stacktrace with every piece of information that is relevant.
That is called exception chaining. By wrapping an exception in a different exception you can let exceptions bubble up the stack without having your main application classes to worry about some low-level exceptions.
Example:
public void doStuff() throws StuffException {
try {
doDatabaseStuff();
} catch (DatabaseException de1) {
throw new StuffException("Could not do stuff in the database.", de1);
}
}
This way your application only has to handle StuffException but it can get to the underlying DatabaseException if it really needs to.
To get to the bottom-most (and all other) exception(s) of an exception you caught you can iterator over its root causes:
...
} catch (SomeException se1) {
Throwable t = se1;
logger.log(Level.WARNING, "Top exception", se1);
while (t.getCause() != null) {
t = t.getCause();
logger.log(Level.WARNING, "Nested exception", t);
}
// now t contains the root cause
}
Exception chaining for ServletException is tricky. Depending on the web server implementation and web development framework in use, at runtime the chain may use cause and/or rootCause. This link explains it very well. To complicate things, I've seen exceptions where the cause points to the exception itself.
Here's a recursive method we have used that covers all bases for ServletExceptions:
public static Throwable getDeepCause(Throwable ex) {
if (ex == null) {
return ex;
}
Throwable cause;
if (ex instanceof ServletException) {
cause = ((ServletException) ex).getRootCause();
if (cause == null) {
cause = ex.getCause();
}
} else {
cause = ex.getCause();
}
if (cause != null && cause != ex) {
return getDeepCause(cause);
} else {
// stop condition - reached the end of the exception chain
return ex;
}
}

Categories

Resources