I have a question about my system's design. I searched the questions but couldn't find the same situation. So currently I have system that has 1 server and multiple(300+ for now) clients that connects with RMI. Since integrity issues I need to make this system fail safe so I need another server. I don't know how to configure my application for that for now but while doing so I'm wondering that if I could the server side clustered even with load balancing? These two servers are going to be different places with different ip addresses of course and they are comprehensive machines as well.
For example for when a client makes a request it makes the request to more available one.
I searched for external solutions but I'm very new to this stuff. Can you make a suggestion about them as well.
I appriciate the responses. If anything is not clear ask and I will clear it as much as I can.
RMI/JRMP doesn't support that in any way shape or form, but RMI/IIOP with a suitable failover ORB might.
Related
sorry if my english isn't perfect.
I'm trying to make an app and I need to exchange information between more devices.
I thought that could be a solution connect the devices on a server but I really don't have the idea where start.
What language I need to study to make this? There is a better solution?
This highly depends on what you are trying to achieve in the first place. It would be helpful if you could tell what you are trying to do, but I will still outline some general aspects:
You need to decide, what information is going to be exchanged and how this should happen
What information: Figure out, what exactly needs to be sent and received. Generic text messages? Images? Byte Streams?
How should this be done: Generally spoken, there are two approaches of getting information as a client: Polling and subscribing.
Polling: This approach means to periodically check an endpoint for new data. For example, HTTP uses this way: A web browser or any other client (REST-Client for example) periodically requests information from a HTTP-Server, using a connection just for this single request.
Subscribing / Sync / Notification: In some way or another, the client tells the server that it is interested in the information and wants to get notified when there is something new. The connection is initiated at the beginning and held open for further usage. The benefit of this approach is that changes are received immediately, but on the other hand a permanent connection needs to be maintained.
Things to study
At the beginning, get a good understanding of the TCP/IP Protocol, how Sockets work, how common Protocols do their job (e.g. HTTP, WebSockets)
Take a look at specific Protocols working on top of the basic ones
Tip: REST: Most common WebServices Protocol, providing a common way to exchange stateless data. Uses Polling.
WebSockets: Socket connection using Web Browsers. Commonly used to update information without needing to poll.
There is no specific language to learn for connections. It's more about understanding what the difficulties are and what ways have been invented to address this. Once you get to this point and know what you want to do, it's possible in every language.
Recommendation: As you seem to use Java/Android, I would try to use REST. A really great client-side library for REST on Android is Retrofit. For the server side use what fits for you .. common Java way would be to use Jersey, but you are free to choose from a lot of choices. If using Jersey is too hard for the beginning, maybe take a look at the JS/NodeJS world, those guys invented Express, which allows you to create a REST service out of just a database, wihtout having to code a lot.
First you need to decide if you want to go for an Android or an iOS application. There are other various mobile operating systems as well, but these are widely used . If you want to go for android which is most widely used in my opinion, then you need to learn Java. If you want to go for iOS application, then you need to learn swift or objectiveC. These languages provide the API to connect with various types of services such as Facebook, Firebase and Amazon etc. If you want to connect to some other local server who’s IP is known to you, then you can use socket programming to send messages.
There could be many ways you can implement this. One way will be using Web services. Of course REST might be a better option, if you follow this approach. You can implement Your service(server side code) with any language. I will recommend you use java since you are already using android.
Aside from this You might need to go through the basics of REST, its specifications and
some reference implementations for language of your preference.
Firstly Cheers to all PROGRAMMERS [ Today = Programmers day :) ]
Secondly,
I'm working on a project where the specifications require using a server as a front end and an application in the back end. The project is an advanced smart home system. The server will handle commands coming from the client through the internet (let's say like a remote control from outside the house) and send them (through a channel of communication) to the application (planning on using JAVA application) which will handle the main logic like controlling hardware stuff (lights ...) , reading from a microphone (local mic) and accessing a database to act as a speech recognition system (offline).
Now I'm still in the planning phase and I'm not sure which technologies are the best for this project. I'm thinking to use Node.js or Apache as the server and a JAVA application as the back end and any SQL database for the application's SRS.
I hope this illustration demonstrates clearly how the system works:
The main question is:
What is the best way to make the Java application communicate with the server (communication channel [must be bidirectional]) ?
and Do you recommend a specific server other than the mentioned ones for this job ?
What crossed my mind so far:
1- JSP and servlets (making the server is the application too). But I don't want a server to handle the offline stuff and I'm not sure if java servlets can access hardware interface. I also want the server to be separate from making critical decisions (different layer for security reasons and since it won't be used as frequently as the local [offline] system).
2- Communication channel :
A- A shared file, but it's a bad idea since I don't want the application to check if the file contents changed (command received) or not from time to time (excessive operations).
B- A an inter-process-communication through a port (socket communication) seems the best solution but I don't know how that would turn in terms of operation cost and communication errors.
OS used : Linux Raspbian
EDIT:
I'm sure ZMQ+Apache is good enough for this task, but how is it in comparison to WebServices (like SOAP) ? Would WebServices be a better solution in terms of standard implementation and security ?
All related suggestions are welcomed, TQ
ZeroMQ is great for internal communications, or any other similar communication solutions.
For specifically your case, I can see that ZeroMQ would be a best fit.
Reasons:
You offline server have to be agnostic to web solution.
Communication can be reliable and bi-directional, possibly another patterns like (pub>sub, req<>res, etc).
Restarting any of sides would not require to restart the sockets (connection) on other side, as messages are queued.
Possibility to scale not just on same hardware, but as well to local area network or even through internet.
Big community of support. It might look a bit hard to get into, but in reality it is dead simple, just go to examples and once concept understood - it is very easy and neat to work with.
ZeroMQ has lots drivers for most popular languages, that includes Java and Node.js.
Considerations:
You need to think over packets and data will be sent. So some popular data protocols like XML or JSON is good way of thinking.
Responsibilities over different services - make sure they are not dependant on each other too much. Or if main offline server - is a core of system, make sure it does not depend on web facing service, so that web face can be removed/replaced/improved etc.
Few more points to think about:
Why Java, and what about modular approach? For example if you want to expand and scale - add more sensors into smart home solutions, then having one giant application would require to change it, it is harder to maintain as well as maintain different clients with own needs. Think modular way - some core functionality for offline stuff, but many aggregator processes that would talk to different sensors. This makes easier to support different setups and environments, as well maintain the system as a whole by improving independent components.
Hi I have designed a desktop application in Java SE with netbeans and Mysql.I do not have any server coding for now since all my operations were of pull type. I need a push notification functionality. Previously I had a button that refreshed the notification but now I want the notifications to be updated automatically.
What would be best way to add this functionality without changing much of my present code.
Any help appreciated.
Thanks a lot
You really will have to change a lot about your architecture to have your application go the other direction. However, I think the best approach is to use a light weight JMS provider. That way your client can code to the JMS API which is really pretty straight forward, and your server can use JMS and its really pretty easy. It's not nearly as much effort as plumbing other options in.
The harder part is setting up the container in your application. It's not tremendously hard, but JMS has lots of options for configuration. Figuring out the point to point vs topic, durable vs non-durable and what's right for your application is a lot of research you have to do if you haven't done JMS before.
But, what this affords you is a very expressive control over messaging in your application. You can under the covers without modifying your code swap between polling or direct connections, message 1:1 or 1:many. If you need to send a message to one client vs. sending a message to all clients. You can segment messages between clients and create groups. Your messages can be durable or non-durable (survive client shutdown or server shutdown). The possibilities are endless, but you have to make a lot of architectural decisions. You also don't have to handle network topology and connectivity issues as much than if you used UDP multicast or TCP connections in reverse.
ActiveMQ and RabbitMQ can be easily embedded within a server using spring in a matter of 20 minutes. They also provide hooks for other platforms. It might sound overkill, but I've tried to do without JMS in the past when I should've used it and regretted not using it.
I have to implement a simple tour client-server game in Java. Unfortunately, I'm just beginning with network programming and have some problems with choosing an apropriate solution.
Let's assume I'm creating a chess game where two clients can connect to the server, authenticate with their username and passwords and play. The clients must be programmed as applets (thin clients), but I don't know what I should use as a server.
I mean, I've read about several different possibilities like RMI, sockets, servlets, but still don't know which one fits bets my needs. I'm a bit confused because I don't fully understand how the communication would be carried out.
Should I create an executable server which would run all the time on the server and wait for the players? This seems to me like an odd way. Or is there any easier way to do so, e.g. can I make a servlet and put it on Tomcat server so that the server would be run only if there are any players? Could that servlet communicate with applets (clients) and vice versa?*
I'd be really grateful for some tips.
can I make a servlet and put it on Tomcat server so that the server would be run only if there are any players
The Tomcat instance would run anyways, otherwise players couldn't connect to it.
What you could do is to provide a server that starts a new game instance when players connect. The server itself would have to always run.
In terms of technology, I'd suggest you use whatever you feel comfortable with. Don't care about performance yet but try and get started.
So if you already have some knowledge with a communication technology, try and use that. Just be aware of the limitations and take those into account (e.g. message formats, push/pull communication etc.).
It depends what kind of game you are after. Applets are usually good choice for presenting animation (completely in Java) and accessible from a browser. Real world examples would divert towards Flash for client presentation.
If your game is a turn type game (chess, cards etc.), then you can implement your logic in form of servlets or web services or ajax, with appropriate use of hashtables or databases to store live sessions on server side. If your game is more involved in terms of user experience (take an example of Need For Speed type, for instance), then creating a custom server make more sense.
If you are looking for a netwrok application framework in Java then you may consider reading about Apache MINA. Documentation claims that it " helps users develop high performance and high scalability network applications easily." and it has support for various transports such as TCP/IP and UDP/IP via Java NIO. Summary of features can be seen here.
My personal experience with MINA is so far good and used in various projects. One implementation resembles your case, Its not a mulitplayer game but do involves multiple applets connecting a server. I found MINA very good in handling multiple sessions. It do it very neatly. Moreover its very easy to scale and maintain code. Easy to add filters and define protocols.
There are no. of good tutorial available to jump start and initial setup is very easy to do.
However, like any emerging opensource project, it has its problems too. That are: Online community is small and documentation, though improving rapidly, is very limited.
Official user guide covers most of the basics and is a good starting point if you want to know more.
I am currently programming a Texas Hold'em LAN game in Java. My problem is how to do the client/server-communication.
Each time something happens at the table, the clients need to be informed of this so they can repaint their GUIs. Also when a players turn is up, they need to be able to fold, call etc.
How do I best implement this? I've looked at callbacks/RMI, but from what I've read, that may cause problems with firewalls(?)
When you are concerned about firewalls, the best way would be to use HTTP, like a web browser. The benefits are:
The protocol is well-known
There are many client and server libraries available, which are well-tested
HTTP is not restricted to web browsers. Any program can talk HTTP.
The downside is that push messages by the server are not commonly used. Of course you can just open an HTTP connection from each client that will wait for data from the server.
I would suggest the Java tutorials on sockets:
http://download.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/networking/sockets/
An example client/server is given.