What is the best practice when it comes to managing dependencies in a small java project? Small meaning one Eclipse Java project. I have 4 different third-party jars that I have added to the Eclipse build path. I have had experience with Maven, but for this small scope, it doesn't seem like it would fit. I have read about Gradle, but have not tried it. What's the best way to approach this?
I recommend Apache IvyIDE.
http://ant.apache.org/ivy/ivyde/
It allows you to manage your dependencies declared in an ivy.xml in your Java Eclipse projects.
Related
Semi-greenthumb here. I'm looking to download some Apache Commons and Google Guava libraries to use in Eclipse. Multiple Q&As (example, example) have said to download the library myself, and then either load it in Eclipse by path as a "User Library" that I can add manually to projects or go through an automated project management plugin like Maven. However, that leaves the question, where should I actually store the library on my system? (Mac OS)
Ideally, I want it in a directory that is common to all Mac/*NIX systems. However, this Q&A seems to suggest that doing so would be a bad idea, and this comment implies that I should keep a separate copy of the library within each project that uses it. This seems like it would be both a waste of space (for projects that use the same library version), as well as make linting Java files in a separate text editor a hassle due to libraries being stored within an Eclipse project's file structure rather than at the system level.
So where should I put 3rd party Java libraries?
I faced the same issue when I was maintaining my project dependencies in a manual way. It is difficult to have control over them, and sometimes updating a library can be a really painful experience if that update breaks a transitive dependency.
All this pain went away when I switched to Maven.
When you configure Maven, you can set the directory where these libraries will reside (common path is {user.dir}/.m2 } and every time a dependency is added to a project (via POM), then Maven will check if that library is already downloaded. If not, it will download it and store it for any future use (of the same version). It also resolves transitive dependencies for you, so you don't have to worry of breaking it when manually replacing a JAR.
This way you don't have to worry where the libraries are, your IDE will reference them automatically using the apropiate Maven plugin
I'm not saying you should use Maven, but if your problem is managing dependencies, then Maven (or any other dependency management system, eg: Gradle) may help you.
The comment you cited is pretty naïve in its approach. There are far too many build management tools to handle dependencies without having to deal with these minutiae.
If you decide on a tool such as Maven, your dependencies will be downloaded into a specified local repository (a directory on your filesystem), and all Mavenized applications can easily be configured to use those (shared) artifacts.
Most Java supported IDEs like Eclipse come with the option to initialize projects with Maven (or Gradle, as another example) and have sleek interfaces to easily edit their configuration files to specify which dependencies your projects will use.
I would strongly recommend either of those as opposed to manual JAR/artifact management, even for basic personal tinkering projects.
I need to put some old java class library code that I have into a repo, from where others can check it out and build it. You know, like any public repo.
But, I'm not sure what the best way to do this is in the java world. In old-fashioned projects, we just used to supply the build scripts and a list of dependencies. You gathered or installed the dependencies separately before running the build scripts.
But these days for many languages, you have package managers and the like that pull from remote locations and your build scripts need to include dependency fetching.
Basically, I'm not familiar with how java libs and programs are packaged.
Should I include the (dependency) libs in the repo? And update them whenever a new version is out?
Does java now have a package manager that will pull in the latest versions of the dependencies?
Do I leave it upto the people checking out to download the libs themselves before they run the build scripts?
I'd prefer it if the solution didn't involve installing a huge package manager. Gradle wants to pull in like 150MB+ of stuff and as far as I am aware, it isn't ubiquitous on java deployments.
Thanks.
Use Maven. I believe these days it's the #1 "package manager" (not a term that's usually used to describe it, but quite apt) by a large margin. It's built into Netbeans, IntelliJ IDEA, and I believe Eclipse.
However, it won't just "pull the latest versions" of your dependencies, since your application may break. Only the versions you specify. Therefore, you should periodically update (and test) your code to reduce incompatibilities when someone tries to use your library in an application which directly or indirectly pulls newer versions of the same libs (and they get into a bit of "dll hell"), or reduce your use of third-party libraries in general.
You should also consider publishing your library in a compiled form to Maven Central so that using your library would be as easy as adding a dependency to the pom.xml. The problem that Maven solves, after all, is not so much making it easy to build your library (since just bundling the dependencies gets you most of the way), but making it easy to use your library.
Today, i donwloaded Spring Framework 4.0.6 latest version but unable to locate the jar files, and i donwloaded eclipse plugin for spring too, here i find nothing and looking for a way to include these jar files into eclipse, here is a pic.
Some tutorials website refers that it contains into lib folder but i can't see it, please help!
It sounds like you have a number of hurdles to overcome:
How to use Eclipse
How to manage Java dependencies
How to use Spring
I'm not sure what your level of experience is, but you may wish to consider using Spring Tool Suite as your IDE - it's based on Eclipse with additonal plugins to aid Spring development.
I also urge you to use Maven or Gradle to manage your dependencies. The Spring documentation provides the configuration for adding the dependencies in both. I'd recommend Maven as a starting point as it is easy to use with little knowledge and is well suited to small, standard projects. Gradle is worth a look once you are comfortable with Maven.
Work though the Guides - I'd start with 'Building Java Projects with Maven'.
Edit
Maven is a dependency management and build tool that favours convention over configuration. Dependency management is powerful in that you can declare a dependency on Spring Core, for example, and it will download all the related dependencies for you.
Gradle performs similar functions to Maven but also provides the ability to use scripting. Gradle is seen by many as Maven's predecessor and has been adopted by Spring over Maven.
In my opinion Maven is easier for you at this stage.
I downloaded Java source code of some project that works with Maven. After checking out
the code to Eclipse, and then building it from the command line, I followed the instructions
and imported it from Eclipse as: File > Import > Maven Projects. Now I have the core source code and many additional sub projects that seem to have the same thing like the core, just separated.
Could anyone please explain me what are these sub projects? why I need them? and on which code I need to work now if I want to make changes, the core or the new imported Maven ones?
I don't know nothing about Maven besides the fact that it's a tool for building code and managing releases.
Thanks!
In Maven land, these are called modules. There a nice way to further divide a project into very distinct pieces.
People handle Maven differently. I've seen projects where there was the actual project module, then 10 or so implementation modules. Most people use them for the above mentioned separation.
Most likely, your going to need all of the modules in order to work correctly.
To modify the project, your going to need Maven. I don't know if Eclipse has an embedded maven, but at least NetBeans does. With this you can modify anything that you want, then build it with Maven, which should be just a simple click.
In addition to what #Quackstar said:
Eclipse has embedded Maven support provided by the m2eclipse plugin. When you import a Maven project consisting of multiple modules, the default behavior is to map each Maven module as a separate Eclipse project. This allows the Eclipse build paths to be constructed in a way that matches the declared Maven module dependencies.
There is also a way to map a multi-module Maven project into a single Eclipse project that entails enabling m2eclipse's "Nested Module" support. This results in an Eclipse project with a build path that is an amalgam of all of the Maven module dependencies ... and not exactly correct. This approach is not recommended by the m2eclipse developers, and I've heard they are intending to remove the nested module feature entirely in a future release.
Perhaps the reason I stalled learning Java until now is because I HATE how Java handles external libraries. I'm stuck keeping them in one place, adding them individually, fixing problems with versioning and every time I move/rename them, and copying and writing the classpath over and over each time I release a Java application.
There has to be an elegant solution to all of this. I keep all of my libraries (regardless of task, platform, or other) in their own little folder inside a "lib" folder in my development folder, kind of like this:
Dev
-lib
+JS-jQuery
+Flex-Degrafa
-Java-Xerces
+Xerces-1.2.3
+More libraries
I can use either Netbeans or Eclipse for Java dev, but none of them provide a very streamlined (and not to mention idiot-proof) way of managing all of these.
A nudge in the right direction or an online article/tutorial on this would be greatly appreciated.
You can either use Ant + Ivy or Maven to manage your library dependencies.
If it is only dependency management you're after and you're happy with the rest of your build process, I would use Ivy, as it can unobtrusively manage your dependencies, leaving your existing build process intact. There is a plugin for Eclipse called IvyIDE that contributes your dependencies via a classpath container.
Maven 2 has a steeper learning curve but provides a much richer set of functionality for building your projects and Eclipse integration through m2eclipse or IAM.
Personally I use Maven as I have a large number of projects to work with and Maven is particularly suited to efficient development across lots of projects.
Have a look at the introductory documentation to see what works for you.
Ivy Tutorial
Maven Getting Started Guide
Netbeans 6.7.1's Maven support is quite good and comes out of the box with the IDE.
The Eclipse addon was frustrating enough that I gave Netbeans another try.
A third choice besides ChssPly76's options is to use Ant with the Maven Ant Tasks. I don't know if I'd call any of these solutions particularly "elegant," but they do spare you the need to manage your own lib/ directory and classpath variables.
If you're working on Linux you can install Java libraries with APT or RPM.
Otherwise, I normally check precompiled JARs into a lib directory in my project's version control repository and make sure the names of the JAR files include full version information. E.g. lib/foo-1.5.6.jar, not lib/foo.jar.
To avoid having to manually set the classpath before running your app, you can set the classpath in the Manifests of the JARs themselves to define the dependencies of each JAR file. The JVM will follow all the dependencies when loading classes.
Maven is often more trouble than it's worth, but the ability to open a maven project directly into IDEs such as IntelliJ is excellent. For example, IntelliJ will download all dependencies and have them available without having to run a build first, or an mvn command and then a project refresh. It also isn't necessary to re-generate the project every time a dependency is added. I work with a number of Eclipse developers who switched to IntelliJ for this alone.
However, one shortfall of Maven is that many libraries (or versions of libraries) are not available on public repositories. Therefore it is often necessary to set up a local repository such as archiva. In ant, it would just be a matter of adding it to the lib directory in the repository.
Maven can also attack when you need to do something that maven doesn't directly support via a plugin. What would normally be a few lines of ant can often turn into a morning's worth of work.
Finally, buildr is an excellent way of using Maven's dependency management and plugins, while also supporting ad-hoc tasks.