I have somoe C# source code that I want to be available for java applications under linux OS.
How can I call some C# method from java code?
I have found http://www.mono-project.com/Java but this looks like writing java code in .net environment. It is not what I look for. Rather I need to create new java library that will expose all functionality from C# code, the new library must be executed in pure java environment. Maybe that is possible with IKVM I am not sure.
Use Mono to compile your C# classes on the Linux platform of your choice;
Use JNI to write a set of facade classes between your java code and the compiled C# code.
The closest tool I can find that might be useful would be JNI4Net
I think you would still need Mono to run a .net framework on Linux as well.
Your question is going to be closed (I voted too) simply because it would finally lead to a tool recommendation.
Your best approach is to rewrite them in Java. Or alternatively, there are existing tools (commercial or free) to convert C# to Java,
CSharpJavaMerger Framework
RemObjects C# who compiles C# to JVM.
and many others
Mono is not something you should consider at this moment. Yes, IKVM.NET only helps running Java code on Mono/.NET, and it won't help you in your case.
It's not clear if you can execute the c# project or not through mono, if you can, then process intercomunication is the way to go.
If you are doing it in Linux I should use a pipe channeling to intercomunicate both processes, works really well and is easy to use.
If you can't execute the c# process, then that's another history, you cannot call directly a .net assembly from java.
And also, using mono on Linux per today gives great results (except for ASP .net), we are using it and are getting really good results (faster responses than Java in most scenarios).
Related
I have a java code and created a jar file.
I need to create an Qt application. Can I use this code in that application?
Please help me how can i use that jar file.
Thanks,
Nagaraju.
You could take a look at the capabilities of GCC/GCJ (see http://gcc.gnu.org/ ). IF it's a good idea is a whole other story, and depends on what you have, and what you're trying to accomplish. It should be doable to link SO's created with GCJ in QT applications, but I seriously wonder if you are not better off using either C++ or Java, but not mixing them
If your Java code takes input from stdin or some file and writes output to stdout or some file, then the easiest way is to fork java to run that jar, and parse the output in your Qt code.
Things other than that, you'll need to be a bit specific. Something like "my Java code does painting the screen".
My advice is to use SWT or Swing.
You can use gcj gcj to compile the java code to library and simply call the functions of the java code from your C code.
Yes, you can use your jar file in your Qt application. I've done exactly this myself.
One way is to use the JNI Invocation API. This is part of the Java Native Interface (JNI), which makes it feasible but not pleasant to access Java APIs from C++.
A much more pleasant approach is to use CodeMesh JunC++ion, which wraps the Java APIs in C++ classes. This is a great product, if you can afford it.
If you have very little Java code, it may be easier to port it to C++.
I need to get control over Windows of WindowsXP using Java code,
I need to click/type on particular button/textfield of given window of windowsXP,
How to do this any idea?
Approaches I tried are:
(1) I Tried AutoIT framework, but its Java Wrapper is buggy.. not stable.
(2) JNA can be used for native interfacing, by using some .dll file
to achieve the same. But I don't know which .dll file is used by windowsXP.
Can anybody elaborate on this?
I've not much idea which is much better solution.
Is there any better framework available for such thing.
Thanks.
WindowsXP uses multiple dll files, not one, and studying its API will tell you which one has which functions, and then you can use this information in your JNA interaction code. BTW, I have use AutoIt by itself to help do what you're trying to do and it works fine, and is easier than Java with JNA since it's built for this sort of thing. I've also used AutoIt with Java by having Java call small AutoIt programs and get some simple interaction via standard input and output streams taking care though of the tips and traps in this great article: When Runtime.exec() won't
This question already has answers here:
Closed 13 years ago.
Possible Duplicate:
Java Python Integration
I have a large existing codebase written in 100% Java, but I would like to use Python for some new sections of it. I need to do some text and language processing, and I'd much rather use Python and a library like NLTK to do this.
I'm aware of the Jython project, but it looks like this represents a way to use Java and its libraries from within Python, rather than the other way round - am I wrong about this?
If not, what would be the best method to interface between Java and Python, such that (ideally) I can call a method in Python and have the result returned to Java?
I'm aware of the Jython project, but
it looks like this represents a way to
use Java and its libraries from within
Python, rather than the other way
round - am I wrong about this?
Yes, you are wrong. You can either call a command line interpreter to run python code using Jyton or use python code from Java. In the past there was also a python-to-Java compiler, but it got discontinued with Jython 2.2
I would write a Python module to handle the text and language processing, and then build a small bridge in jython that your java program can interact with. The jython bridge will be a very simple one, that's really only responsible for forwarding calls to the python module, and return the answer from the python module to the java module. Jython is really easy to use, and setup shouldn't take you more than 15 minutes.
Best of luck!
I don't think you could use NLTK from Jython, since it depends on Numpy which isn't ported to the JVM. If you need NLTK or any other native CPython extension, you might consider using some IPC mechanism to communicate between CPython and the JVM. That being said, there is a project to allow calling CPython from Java, called Jepp:
http://jepp.sourceforge.net/
The reverse (calling Java code from CPython) is the goal of JPype and javaclass:
sourceforge.net/projects/jpype/
pypi.python.org/pypi/javaclass/0.1
I've never used any of these project, so I cant't vow for their quality.
Jython is a Python implementation running on the JVM. You can find information about embedding Python in an existing Java app in the user guide.
I don't know the environment that you're working in, but be aware that mixing languages in the same app can quickly lead to a mess. I recommend creating Java interfaces to represent the operations that you plan to use, along with separately-packaged implementation classes that wrap the Python code.
IN my opinion, Jython is exactly what you are looking at.
It is an implementation of Python within the JVM; as such, you can freely exchange objects and, for instance, inherit from a Java class (with some limitations).
Note that, its major strength point (being on top of of JVM) is also its major drawback, because it cannot use all (C)Python extension written in C (or in any other compiled language); this may have an impact on what you are willing to do with your text processing.
For more information about what is Jython, its potential and its limitations, I suggest you reading the Jython FAQ.
Simply run the Python interpreter as a subprocess from within Java.
Write your Python functionality as a proper script, which reads from stdin and writes to stdout.
Use the Java Runtime class to spawn a subprocess that runs your Python script. This is very simple to do and provides a very clean interface.
Edit
import simplejson
import sys
for request in sys.stdin.readlines():
args = simplejson.loads( request )
result = myFunction( args['this'], args['that'] )
sys.stdout.writeline( simplejson.dumps( result ) + "\n" )
The interface is simple, structured and very low overhead.
Remember to first check from those paying for the development that they're OK with the codebase needing a developer who knows both Python and Java from now on, and other cost and maintainability effects you've undoubtedly already accounted for.
See: http://www.acm.org/about/se-code 1.06, 2.03, 2.09, 4.03, 4.05, 6.07
Are there inexpensive or free gateways from .NET to Java? I'm looking at some data acquisition hardware which has drivers for C/C++ and .NET -- I really don't want to do any programming in .NET.
Update: I haven't done what I originally wanted to do, but I've done something similar, using JNA to encapsulate some functions from a DLL, in order to control a USB hardware device from Java. (the DLL comes from the device manufacturer) It works really nicely. Thanks!
You could also try to use JNA for accessing the native library. JNA provides Java programs easy access to native shared libraries (DLLs on Windows) without writing anything but Java code—no JNI or native code is required. If their API is fairly straight foward, this might be the path of least resistance.
See their getting started guide where they call some native code (printf and GetSystemTime).
Well, there's JNBridge and EZ JCom, just from a Google search.
You could also use IKVM which is a slightly different approach.
(Any reason for not wanting to learn .NET, out of interest? It's a nice platform, and C# is a lovely language...)
If they have C++ versions of the drivers then you could write a wrapper around it using JNI and then load that in Java. JNI can be a bit of a pain, but it would let you use the C++ version of their drivers and not have to deal with .Net at all if you don't want.
I am partial to the recommendation to jump in the deep end with C# since it is so similar to Java. I did this and used IKVM to compile my favorite Java libs. to .NET assemblies and you get [nearly] all the core java runtime classes to boot, so if you tire of trying to find just the right C# collection type, you can always go back to java.util. (No generic collections though. Not sure why.)
Depending on what platform you're on, you have several choices for free IDEs too. For windows you can get Visual Studio Express for free but I also use SharpDevelop. You can also get the Mono IDE on Linux (and a few flavours of Unix, I think ?).
The C# learning curve is shallow if you already know Java. I only blew off 1.5 limbs on landmines that came out of nowhere for reasons I still don't understand, but workarounds were easy to come by. The worst thing about it was the darn developer docs which are AWFUL on account of being so slow. I really miss the snappiness of JavaDoc. Not only are the online docs incredibly slow, the problem is compounded by someones's iffy decision to put class summaries, constructors and methods/properties all on seperate pages so it just takes forever. Someone said to get the docs installer and install docs locally for a slightly improved experience. Not a bad idea I suppose.
I am author of jni4net, open source interprocess bridge between JVM and CLR. It's build on top of JNI and PInvoke. No C/C++ code needed. I hope it will help you.
If you have a Java application, the JNI mentioned by the others will be the way to go. You write some wrapper classes, and that's it.
If writing the wrappes is a too big task (depending on the number of methods you have to wrap), have a look at SWIG . I think it generates wrappers automatically, but I never actually used it.
If you want to code in the Java language, but you don't care if your program will run on the JRE/JVM, then you might as well use Microsoft J#. Basically, it's writing Java-Code wich is compiled to .NET-Bytecode and can use the .NET classes of the driver as well as your existing Java classes. With J# you will run into problems if your existing Java-code is newer than Java 1.4, look at this question on how to solve them.
From that point on, you could later add code in J#, C# or any other .NET language. However, you won't get back to the JRE/JVM easily.
I'm wondering if a Java library can be called from a VB.net application.
(A Google search turns up lots of shady answers, but nothing definitive)
No, you can't. Unless you are willing to use some "J#" libraries (which is not nearly the same as Java) or IKVM which is a Java implementation that runs on top of .NET, but as their documentation says:
IKVM.OpenJDK.ClassLibrary.dll: compiled version of the Java class libraries derived from the OpenJDK class library with some parts filled in with code from GNU Classpath and IcedTea, plus some additional IKVM.NET specific code.
So it's not the real deal.
I am author of jni4net, open source intraprocess bridge between JVM and CLR. It's build on top of JNI and PInvoke. No C/C++ code needed. I hope it will help you.
You can call Java from .NET if you wrap it in some form to make it accessable and the easiest way is typically to use a Runtime bridge like
http://www.jnbridge.com/
Other way is to wrap your API with java webservices.
check this also http://www.devx.com/interop/Article/19945
Nothing out of the box.
Most java/.net interop that I know uses web services.
If you can create COM components with Java, you can use tlbimp to create an interop assembly for using in VB.Net.
If can create standard DLLs that can be used from C++ with Java, you can write P/Invoke declarations and call them from VB.Net.
If you can create a web service with Java, you can generate proxy class from the WSDL and call it from VB.Net.
In any case, chances are the Java component will live in a separate process. I doubt you can load both the Java VM and the CLR in the same process.
If you have the source code and compile it using the J# compiler, then the answer is yes. If you want to call any pre-Java 2 (aka 1.2) libraries, then these are included pretty much verbatim with J#. More recent stuff is going to be tricky though (i.e., it's not there).
An example where this is used commercially are the yFiles graph layout algorithms from yWorks. These were originally just a Java library, but for the past few years they've been offering a .NET version, which is just the Java version compiled with Visual J#.
It's not without problems, and there are some limitations that you can't get around, but it can be done. So... unfortunately this answer looks pretty shady as well.
You could use JNI to instantiate a virtual machine and then use Java Classes. It will be some fun, though, because you would need to use C++ as a bridge between VB.Net and Java.
This article in java world has a quick tutorial on how to use Java from C++ and viceversa.
http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/javatips/jw-javatip17.html
If you have the source, Visual Studio will let you convert Java code into c#.