Develop Reference

How to map how to map a list being the first element of a list to a list using MapStruct

I have
// Input DTOs:
public class FeatureIn {
private String val1;
private String val2;
}
public class ContainerIn {
private List<FeatureIn> features;
}
public class PersonIn {
private String name;
private String age;
private List<ContainerIn> containers;
}
// Output DTOs:
public class FeatureOut {
private String val1;
private String val2;
}
public class PersonOut {
private String name;
private Integer age;
private List<FeatureOut> features;
}
What I have to do is to map PersonIn -> PersonOut. For name and age it is easy. For features is quite complicated. I'm receiving the PersonOut object that contains containers list (but this list is already filtered so it will always have only 1 object). I have to read first object of this list and then map List to List. In other words. PersonOut.containers.get(0).features should be mapped to PersonOut.features
I tried those two:
#Mapper(componentModel = "spring")
public interface PersonMapper {
#Mapping(target = "features", source = "containers.features")
PersonOut toPersonOut(PersonIn personIn);
}
#Mapper(componentModel = "spring")
public interface PersonMapper {
#Mapping(target = "features", expression = "java(personIn.getContainers().get(0).getFeatures())")
PersonOut toPersonOut(PersonIn personIn);
}
but it doesn't work. How can I do it?
The second solution (expression) is almost working... Mapper is generated but I have compilation fail in this line:
List<FeatureOut> features = personIn.getContainers().get(0).getFeatures();
because he tries to map List to List
but types are not compatible - how can I tell him how to map it?
I tried to add use = FeaturesMapper.class to my #Mapper but it was not working.

Quick solution, you can use a custom mapper by using qualifiedByName, for example:
#Mapper(componentModel = "spring")
public interface PersonMapper {
#Mapping(target = "features", source = "containers", qualifiedByName = "mapContainers")
PersonOut toPersonOut(PersonIn personIn);
FeatureOut toFeatureIn(FeatureIn featureIn);
#Named("mapContainers")
default List<FeatureOut> mapContainers(List<ContainerIn> containers){
if(CollectionUtils.isEmpty(containers)){
return Collections.emptyList();
}
return containers.get(0).getFeatures().stream()
.map(this::toFeatureIn)
.collect(Collectors.toList());
}
}

Try this:
#Mapper
public interface FeatureMapper {
List<FeatureOut> map(List<FeatureIn> featureIn);
}
#Mapper(uses = { FeatureMapper.class })
public interface PersonMapper {
List<PersonOut> map(List<PersonIn> peopleIn);
}

Collectors.groupingBy with custom key name

I have class let's say CheeseMojo having various fields as follow:
public class CheeseMojo {
private String recipies = "Recipies";
private int age;
private String name;
private int submissionId;
//getter/setter
}
Now I want to sort it based on submissionId using Collectors.groupingBy function, then below code snippet will do the job
Map<Integer,List<CheeseMojo>> map = new HashMap<>();
map = cheeseMojos.stream().collect(Collectors.groupingBy(CheeseMojo::getSubmissionId));
And the output will be something like below:
{1=[CheeseMojo#111111],2=[CheeseMojo#222222]}
But I want my output something like below:
{"Recipies1"=[CheeseMojo#111111],"Recipies2"=[CheeseMojo#222222]}
Please help

Why don't you just map the key either before collecting (lets say by creating an instance of a wrapper class that has
public class CheeseMojoWrapper {
private final String id;
private final CheeseMojo wrapped;
public CheeseMojoWrapper(CheeseMojo toWrap) {
id = "Recipe" + toWrap.getId();
wrapped = toWrap;
}
}
or using a stream on the entrySet() of your resulting map...

Jakson polymorphic Enum case

I am glued with some Jackson polymorphic problem.
I work on a web JDR Character Editor personnal project. I use Springboot and try to stuck with the phylosophy. Moreover, I try to make some independent packages, because of study-case for my real work (another springboot project).
With no Jackson configuration, I have no problem for serialization of a Competence. But when I try to get back any modification on the web editor, so when Jackson make a deserialization of a Competence, problems occur with "dependance" property.
Here are my classes:
The one I try to serialize/deserialize:
public class Competence implements Composante, ComposanteTemplate {
public enum Categorie {
APPRENTI,
COMPAGNON
}
private String nom;
private String description;
private Categorie categorie;
private Chapitre chapitre;
private AttributTemplate dependance;
private List sousCompetences = new ArrayList();
public String getNom() {
return nom;
}
public void setNom(String nom) {
this.nom = nom;
}
public String getDescription() {
return description;
}
public void setDescription(String description) {
this.description = description;
}
public Competence getTemplate() {
return this;
}
public Categorie getCategorie() {
return categorie;
}
public void setCategorie(Categorie categorie) {
this.categorie = categorie;
}
public Chapitre getChapitre() {
return chapitre;
}
public void setChapitre(Chapitre chapitre) {
this.chapitre = chapitre;
}
public AttributTemplate getDependance() {
return dependance;
}
public void setDependance(AttributTemplate dependance) {
this.dependance = dependance;
}
public List getSousCompetences() {
return sousCompetences;
}
public void setSousCompetences(List sousCompetences) {
this.sousCompetences = sousCompetences;
}
public boolean isOuverte() {
return !sousCompetences.isEmpty();
}
}
The superclass of the property I have a problem with:
public interface AttributTemplate extends ComposanteTemplate {}
The two subclasses which could be use for Competence#dependance property:
public enum Carac implements AttributTemplate, Attribut {
FORT(Type.PHYSIQUE),
AGILE(Type.PHYSIQUE),
RESISTANT(Type.PHYSIQUE),
OBSERVATEUR(Type.PHYSIQUE),
SAVANT(Type.MENTALE),
RUSE(Type.MENTALE),
TALENTUEUX(Type.MENTALE),
CHARMEUR(Type.MENTALE);
public enum Type {
PHYSIQUE,
MENTALE
}
public final Type type;
public final String nom = name().toLowerCase();
private String description;
Carac(Type type) {
this.type = type;
}
#Override
public String getNom() { return nom; }
#Override
public String getDescription() { return description; }
#Override
public Carac getTemplate() { return this; }
public void setDescription(String description) { this.description = description; }
}
public enum ArtTemplate implements AttributTemplate {
ART_GUERRIER(2, 1),
ART_ETRANGE(1, 2),
ART_GUILDIEN(1, 1);
public static final String ART_PREFIX = "ART";
public final String nom = name().toLowerCase().replace("_", " ");
public final int nbCaracsPhysiques;
public final int nbCaracsMentales;
private String description;
ArtTemplate(int nbCaracsPhysiques, int nbCaracsMentales) {
this.nbCaracsMentales = nbCaracsMentales;
this.nbCaracsPhysiques = nbCaracsPhysiques;
}
#Override
public String getNom() {
return nom;
}
#Override
public String getDescription() {
return description;
}
public void setDescription(String description) {
this.description = description;
}
public int getNbCaracs() {
return nbCaracsPhysiques + nbCaracsMentales;
}
}
The result json (and then the json I send) is:
{"nom":"Comp_1489746646510","description":"ezbuixnwrclfvmgwdviubcauenzytpzzvumnohwyhpuynxaqhkjdbqygtrmbtlschthovuyoiolkauucwokkfjnaujnufshrjboykuqce","categorie":"APPRENTI","chapitre":"GUERRE","dependance":"ART_ETRANGE","ouverte":false,"sousCompetences":[]}
QUESTION:
I understand that my problem is caused by the abstract relation AttributTemplate, and then when Jackson try to deserialize, he does not know which of Carac or ArtTemplate class to use.
I try to keep unchanged Competence (Competence come from an external jar), so no annotation on this class is possible.
I've tried many of the solutions I found (Jackson 1.5: Polymorphic Type Handling, first steps ) and the only one which has worked was to define a DeserializationProblemHandler
mapper.addHandler(new DeserializationProblemHandler() {
#Override
public Object handleMissingInstantiator(DeserializationContext ctxt, Class<?> instClass, JsonParser p, String msg) throws IOException {
if (instClass == AttributTemplate.class) {
String name = p.getText();
return !name.startsWith(ArtTemplate.ART_PREFIX) ? Carac.valueOf(name) : ArtTemplate.valueOf(name);
}
return super.handleMissingInstantiator(ctxt, instClass, p, msg);
}
});
But I feel bad with this solution, because I am sure there is an other beautiful one.
So is it possible to configure the mapper in order that he is able to determine which of Carac or ArtTemplate he must use to get AttributTemplate?
EDIT:
I managed to have this:
{"nom":"Comp_1489756873433","description":"kruzueemlwisibshlkotasayfkhdqkqolvhlqgsnntndkpvbmmgklqysabiakaolempmupeyiqaztdcrhwimdksgzybbdzttwnwqjxhfo","categorie":"COMPAGNON","chapitre":"GUERRE","dependance":["mova.ged.perso.inne.Carac","AGILE"],"ouverte":true,"sousCompetences":[...]}
by configuring like this the mapper
abstract class CompetenceMixIn {
private AttributTemplate dependance;
#JsonTypeInfo(use=JsonTypeInfo.Id.CLASS, include=JsonTypeInfo.As.EXISTING_PROPERTY, property="dependance")
#JsonSubTypes({ #JsonSubTypes.Type(value = Carac.class, name = "carac"), #JsonSubTypes.Type(value = ArtTemplate.class, name = "artTemplate") })
public void setDependance(AttributTemplate dependance) {
this.dependance = dependance;
}
}
ObjectMapper mapper = jsonConverter.getObjectMapper();
mapper.addMixIn(Competence.class, CompetenceMixIn.class);
As you could see, I'm still parasited with the array that wrapped dependance value. I would (...)"dependance": "AGILE", (...) not (...)"dependance":["mova.ged.perso.inne.Carac", "AGILE"], (...)
And I don't know what to change in order to have this.

i have been looking into what you are trying to do. Unfortunatelly, I believe there are issues with Enums + inheritance.
I have an alternative solution that you could be using which is to use a custom creator and ignore unknown properties. See the following example:
public class JacksonInheritance {
public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException {
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
Competence c = new Competence();
c.desc = "desc";
c.nome = "nome";
c.template = Att1.TEST_Att1;
String test = mapper.writeValueAsString(c);
System.out.println(test);
Competence readValue = mapper.readValue(test, Competence.class);
System.out.println(readValue.template);
}
#JsonIgnoreProperties(ignoreUnknown = true)
public static class Competence {
private static final Map<String, AttributeTemplate> templates;
static {
templates = new HashMap<>();
Stream.of(Att1.values()).forEach( a -> templates.put(a.name(), a));
Stream.of(Att2.values()).forEach( a -> templates.put(a.name(), a));
}
#JsonProperty
String nome;
#JsonProperty
String desc;
#JsonIgnore
AttributeTemplate template;
#JsonProperty("template_type")
public String getTempl() {
// Here you can do whichever way uou would like to serialise your template. This will be the key
return template.toString();
}
#JsonCreator
public static Competence create(#JsonProperty("template_type") String templateType) {
Competence c = new Competence();
c.template = templates.get(templateType);
return c;
}
}
public static interface AttributeTemplate {
}
public static enum Att1 implements AttributeTemplate {
TEST_Att1;
}
public static enum Att2 implements AttributeTemplate {
TEST2_Att2;
}
}
Here I am detaching the enum logic from the jackson logic and implement my own. This does not require a custom serialisation.
I basically say that I serialise my enum as its value (you can obviously choose which ever properties you would like for this).
My output json then looks as:
{"template_type":"TEST_Att1","nome":"nome","desc":"desc"}
At the return step I now know that the information I need to construct the correct enum template type from the template_type attribute. This is what I can inject into my factory method create.
In the create I can use my statically created map to populate the correct enum into my object. We can just create this map statically since our enums are finite and static.
The beauty of this is also that the generator is only used for creation. Using #JsonIgnoreProperties(ignoreUnknown = true), we can tell jackson to not freak out by all our custom elements in the json. It will simply deserialise any fields it can detect and leave the other ones (since we are using a custom template_type for our enum resolution).
Finally, I am ignoring the actual template in my bean because jackson won't be able to construct that.
I hope that this works for you/helps you. Sorry about the delay.
Reason for not using inheritance:
There seem to be issues with enum + inheritance in jackson. Particularly jackson by default uses reflection and calls the private constructor of the enum for generation. You may be able to get creators to work in a similar way as above though.
The deserialisation expects the template. I am going of the assumption that you do NOT necessarily want to serialise all elements of the enum. This is because the enum name, in my case TEST_Att1 makes the enum unique. There is no need to serialise and send all the different attributes these enums have around. However, Deserialization with #JsonSubTypes for no value - missing property error shows that jackson requires your template field to be at least present. This is a a slight issue, because you want to use an external property for this instead (so why include a null-field as suggested in your json just to make jackson happy)
This may not be the best solution, but I think it is relatively elegant given the restrictions. I hope that helps you,
Artur

Convert JSON many objects to single JSON using Jackson

I have JSON, with differents levels field, so I want to convert to a single JSON with fields with one level for example:
{
"prop1":"value1",
"prob2":"value2",
"prop3": {
"prop4":"value4",
"prop5":"value5"
}
... many level fields
}
result
{
"prop1":"value1",
"prop2":"value2",
"prop4":"value4",
"prop5":"value5"
.......
}
I'm using Jackson with annotation #JsonProperty("field"), I haven't problem wih fields of first level , but I don´t know how to access field where to into more inside JSON , for this example are prop4 and prop5.

JsonUnwrapped is the annotation to use, it even works for multi-level nesting. For example:
#RunWith(JUnit4.class)
public class Sample {
#Test
public void testName() throws Exception {
SampleClass sample = new SampleClass("value1", "value2", new SubClass("value4", "value5", new SubSubClass("value7")));
new ObjectMapper().writeValue(System.out, sample);
}
#JsonAutoDetect(fieldVisibility=Visibility.ANY)
public static class SampleClass {
private String prop1;
private String prop2;
#JsonUnwrapped
private SubClass prop3;
public SampleClass(String prop1, String prop2, SubClass prop3) {
this.prop1 = prop1;
this.prop2 = prop2;
this.prop3 = prop3;
}
}
#JsonAutoDetect(fieldVisibility=Visibility.ANY)
public static class SubClass {
private String prop4;
private String prop5;
#JsonUnwrapped
private SubSubClass prop6;
public SubClass(String prop4, String prop5, SubSubClass prop6) {
this.prop4 = prop4;
this.prop5 = prop5;
this.prop6 = prop6;
}
}
#JsonAutoDetect(fieldVisibility=Visibility.ANY)
public static class SubSubClass{
private String prop7;
public SubSubClass(String prop7) {
this.prop7 = prop7;
}
}
}
will generate
{"prop1":"value1","prop2":"value2","prop4":"value4","prop5":"value5","prop7":"value7"}

Try implementing the #JsonUnwrapped annotation. More information at http://jackson.codehaus.org/1.9.9/javadoc/org/codehaus/jackson/annotate/JsonUnwrapped.html

How to rename root key in JSON serialization with Jackson

I am using Jackson for JSON serialization of a list of objects.
Here is what I get:
{"ArrayList":[{"id":1,"name":"test name"}]}
But I want this :
{"rootname":[{"id":1,"name":"test name"}]} // ie showing the string I want as the root name.
Below is my approach to this:
Interface:
public interface MyInterface {
public long getId();
public String getName();
}
Implementation class:
#JsonRootName(value = "rootname")
public class MyImpl implements MyInterface {
private final long id;
private String name;
public MyImpl(final long id,final name) {
this.id = id;
this.name = name;
}
// getters
}
JSon serialization:
public class MySerializer {
public static String serializeList(final List<MyInterface> lists) {
//check for null value.Throw Exception
final ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
mapper.configure(SerializationConfig.Feature.WRAP_ROOT_VALUE, true);
return mapper.writeValueAsString(lists);
}
}
Test:
final List<MyInterface> list = new ArrayList<MyImpl>();
MyImpl item = new MyImpl(1L,"test name");
list.add(item);
final String json = MySerializer.serializeList(list);
System.out.println(json);
Here is what I get:
{"ArrayList":[{"id":1,"name":"test name"}]}
But I want this :
{"rootname":[{"id":1,"name":"test name"}]} // ie showing the string I want as the root name.
I have tried all suggested solutions I could find but failed to achieve my goal. I have looked at:
Jackson : custom collection serialization to JSON
How do I rename the root key of a JSON with Java Jackson?
Jackson : custom collection serialization to JSON
Or am I missing something? I am using jackson 1.9.12 for this. Any help in this regard is welcome.

Well, by default Jackson uses one of two annotations when trying to determine the root name to be displayed for wrapped values - #XmlRootElement or #JsonRootName. It expects this annotation to be on the type being serialized, else it will use the simple name of the type as the root name.
In your case, you are serializing a list, which is why the root name is 'ArrayList' (simple name of the type being serialized). Each element in the list may be of a type annotated with #JsonRootName, but the list itself is not.
When the root value you are trying to wrap is a collection then you need some way of defining the wrap name:
Holder/Wrapper Class
You can create a wrapper class to hold the list, with an annotation to define the desired property name (you only need to use this method when you do not have direct control of the ObjectMapper/JSON transformation process):
class MyInterfaceList {
#JsonProperty("rootname")
private List<MyInterface> list;
public List<MyInterface> getList() {
return list;
}
public void setList(List<MyInterface> list) {
this.list = list;
}
}
final List<MyInterface> lists = new ArrayList<MyInterface>(4);
lists.add(new MyImpl(1L, "test name"));
MyInterfaceList listHolder = new MyInterfaceList();
listHolder.setList(lists);
final String json = mapper.writeValueAsString(listHolder);
Object Writer
This is the preferable option. Use a configured ObjectWriter instance to generate the JSON. In particular, we are interested in the withRootName method:
final List<MyInterface> lists = new ArrayList<MyInterface>(4);
lists.add(new MyImpl(1L, "test name"));
final ObjectWriter writer = mapper.writer().withRootName("rootName");
final String json = writer.writeValueAsString(lists);

I know, I am late , but I have better approach which don't require Holder/Wrapper Class. It picks root key from annotation.
package com.test;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonRootName;
#JsonRootName("Products")
public class ProductDTO {
private String name;
private String description;
public String getName() {
return name;
}
public void setName(String name) {
this.name = name;
}
public String getDescription() {
return description;
}
public void setDescription(String description) {
this.description = description;
}
}
Here is test class:-
package com.test;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import org.junit.Test;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonRootName;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.core.JsonGenerationException;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.JsonMappingException;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper;
public class ProductDTOTestCase {
#Test
public void testPersistAndFindById() throws JsonGenerationException, JsonMappingException, IOException {
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
ProductDTO productDTO = new ProductDTO();
productDTO.setDescription("Product 4 - Test");
ArrayList<ProductDTO> arrayList = new ArrayList<ProductDTO>();
arrayList.add(productDTO);
String rootName = ProductDTO.class.getAnnotation(JsonRootName.class).value();
System.out.println(mapper.writer().withRootName(rootName).writeValueAsString(arrayList));
}
}
It will give following output
{"Products":[{"name":null,"description":"Product 4 - Test"}]}

#JsonTypeName("usuarios")
#JsonTypeInfo(include= JsonTypeInfo.As.WRAPPER_OBJECT,use= JsonTypeInfo.Id.NAME)
public class UsuarioDT extends ArrayList<Usuario> {
#JsonProperty("rowsAffected")
private Integer afectados;
public Integer getAfectados() {
return afectados;
}
public void setAfectados(Integer afectados) {
this.afectados = afectados;
}
}

You need to use this annotation at the top of the class
#JsonTypeName("rootname")