I am using Jackson for JSON serialization of a list of objects.
Here is what I get:
{"ArrayList":[{"id":1,"name":"test name"}]}
But I want this :
{"rootname":[{"id":1,"name":"test name"}]} // ie showing the string I want as the root name.
Below is my approach to this:
Interface:
public interface MyInterface {
public long getId();
public String getName();
}
Implementation class:
#JsonRootName(value = "rootname")
public class MyImpl implements MyInterface {
private final long id;
private String name;
public MyImpl(final long id,final name) {
this.id = id;
this.name = name;
}
// getters
}
JSon serialization:
public class MySerializer {
public static String serializeList(final List<MyInterface> lists) {
//check for null value.Throw Exception
final ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
mapper.configure(SerializationConfig.Feature.WRAP_ROOT_VALUE, true);
return mapper.writeValueAsString(lists);
}
}
Test:
final List<MyInterface> list = new ArrayList<MyImpl>();
MyImpl item = new MyImpl(1L,"test name");
list.add(item);
final String json = MySerializer.serializeList(list);
System.out.println(json);
Here is what I get:
{"ArrayList":[{"id":1,"name":"test name"}]}
But I want this :
{"rootname":[{"id":1,"name":"test name"}]} // ie showing the string I want as the root name.
I have tried all suggested solutions I could find but failed to achieve my goal. I have looked at:
Jackson : custom collection serialization to JSON
How do I rename the root key of a JSON with Java Jackson?
Jackson : custom collection serialization to JSON
Or am I missing something? I am using jackson 1.9.12 for this. Any help in this regard is welcome.
Well, by default Jackson uses one of two annotations when trying to determine the root name to be displayed for wrapped values - #XmlRootElement or #JsonRootName. It expects this annotation to be on the type being serialized, else it will use the simple name of the type as the root name.
In your case, you are serializing a list, which is why the root name is 'ArrayList' (simple name of the type being serialized). Each element in the list may be of a type annotated with #JsonRootName, but the list itself is not.
When the root value you are trying to wrap is a collection then you need some way of defining the wrap name:
Holder/Wrapper Class
You can create a wrapper class to hold the list, with an annotation to define the desired property name (you only need to use this method when you do not have direct control of the ObjectMapper/JSON transformation process):
class MyInterfaceList {
#JsonProperty("rootname")
private List<MyInterface> list;
public List<MyInterface> getList() {
return list;
}
public void setList(List<MyInterface> list) {
this.list = list;
}
}
final List<MyInterface> lists = new ArrayList<MyInterface>(4);
lists.add(new MyImpl(1L, "test name"));
MyInterfaceList listHolder = new MyInterfaceList();
listHolder.setList(lists);
final String json = mapper.writeValueAsString(listHolder);
Object Writer
This is the preferable option. Use a configured ObjectWriter instance to generate the JSON. In particular, we are interested in the withRootName method:
final List<MyInterface> lists = new ArrayList<MyInterface>(4);
lists.add(new MyImpl(1L, "test name"));
final ObjectWriter writer = mapper.writer().withRootName("rootName");
final String json = writer.writeValueAsString(lists);
I know, I am late , but I have better approach which don't require Holder/Wrapper Class. It picks root key from annotation.
package com.test;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonRootName;
#JsonRootName("Products")
public class ProductDTO {
private String name;
private String description;
public String getName() {
return name;
}
public void setName(String name) {
this.name = name;
}
public String getDescription() {
return description;
}
public void setDescription(String description) {
this.description = description;
}
}
Here is test class:-
package com.test;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import org.junit.Test;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonRootName;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.core.JsonGenerationException;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.JsonMappingException;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper;
public class ProductDTOTestCase {
#Test
public void testPersistAndFindById() throws JsonGenerationException, JsonMappingException, IOException {
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
ProductDTO productDTO = new ProductDTO();
productDTO.setDescription("Product 4 - Test");
ArrayList<ProductDTO> arrayList = new ArrayList<ProductDTO>();
arrayList.add(productDTO);
String rootName = ProductDTO.class.getAnnotation(JsonRootName.class).value();
System.out.println(mapper.writer().withRootName(rootName).writeValueAsString(arrayList));
}
}
It will give following output
{"Products":[{"name":null,"description":"Product 4 - Test"}]}
#JsonTypeName("usuarios")
#JsonTypeInfo(include= JsonTypeInfo.As.WRAPPER_OBJECT,use= JsonTypeInfo.Id.NAME)
public class UsuarioDT extends ArrayList<Usuario> {
#JsonProperty("rowsAffected")
private Integer afectados;
public Integer getAfectados() {
return afectados;
}
public void setAfectados(Integer afectados) {
this.afectados = afectados;
}
}
You need to use this annotation at the top of the class
#JsonTypeName("rootname")
Related
I am trying to generate the following using fasterxml jackson.. but I am stuck. I can't seem to work out how to create arrays.
{
"setAccId":"12345",
"groupOf":null,
"isEnabled":false,
"list":[
{
"student":"jim",
"type":"S_A",
"retro":null
},
{
"student":"bob",
"type":"S_A",
"retro":null
}
],
"sort":[]
}
I have two classes. One has the Json properties, and the other is where I print it.
Below class (DynamicJsonHelper) is where I have all the json properties
package com.company.jsonfc;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonProperty;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonPropertyOrder;
#JsonPropertyOrder({
"accId",
"groupOf",
"isEnabled"
})
public class DynamicJsonHelper {
public String accId;
public String groupOf;
public List studentList;
#JsonProperty("accId")
public void setAccId(String accId) {
this.accId = accId;
}
#JsonProperty("groupOf")
public void setGroupOf(String groupOf) {
this.groupOf = groupOf;
}
#JsonProperty("isEnabled")
public boolean isEnabled() {
return false;
}
#JsonProperty("studentList")
public List<StudentList> studentList() {
return studentList;
}
}
Student List Class (as suggested)
class StudentList {
String student;
String type;
String retro;
}
And here is class (PrintJson) where I call it.
import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonInclude;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.core.JsonProcessingException;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.node.JsonNodeFactory;
import com.company.jsonfc.DynamicJsonHelper;
#JsonInclude(JsonInclude.Include.NON_NULL)
public class PrintJson {
#Test
public void create_json() throws JsonProcessingException {
final JsonNodeFactory factory = JsonNodeFactory.instance;
DynamicJsonHelper dynamicJsonHelper = new DynamicJsonHelper();
String jsonString;
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
dynamicJsonHelper.setAccId("12345");
jsonString = mapper.writeValueAsString(dynamicJsonHelper);
System.out.println(jsonString);
}
}
This results in printing the following:
{
"setAccId":"12345",
"groupOf":null,
"isEnabled":false
"studentList":null
}
1) How do I add the list:[ ... ] array & the sort: [ ] at the end too?
2) In class PrintJson, I don't set value for groupOf but it is still created in Json. How do I set it so if I set value, it is printed.. otherwise it is not included in the json being printed.
I would appreciate if you took my code and gave me example based on it for better understanding please
1) How do I add the list:[ ... ] array & the sort: [ ] at the end too?
Answer: You can create two more classes one for list and one for sort. Now in the class DynamicJsonHelper you can add both of them like you have added accId or isEnabled
and they will be printed. Make sure to add the fields you want in them as instance variables in both of the classes. For example for list you can have a class like:
class StudentList{
String student;
String type;
String retro;
}
Now add a field in your class DynamicJsonHelper as List<StudentList>. Similarly you can do for sort.
2) In class PrintJson, I don't set value for groupOf but it is still
created in Json. How do I set it so if I set value, it is printed..
otherwise it is not included in the json being printed.
Answer: You can either use Object mapper and set it to ignore the null fields during serialization. For eg: mapper.setSerializationInclusion(Include.NON_NULL);
Or you can set it at class level to ignore null values if any. For eg:
#JsonInclude(Include.NON_NULL)
class Test
{
String t;
}
As mentioned in the comments by aBnormaLz above doesn't work if the type is primitive like you have for isEnabled. So consider changing it to Boolean and ensure the same for other fields also.
Edit:
#JsonPropertyOrder({
"accId",
"groupOf",
"isEnabled"
})
#JsonInclude(JsonInclude.Include.NON_NULL)
public class DynamicJsonHelper {
public String accId;
public String groupOf;
public List<Student> studentList;
#JsonProperty("accId")
public void setAccId(String accId) {
this.accId = accId;
}
#JsonProperty("groupOf")
public void setGroupOf(String groupOf) {
this.groupOf = groupOf;
}
#JsonProperty("isEnabled")
public boolean isEnabled() {
return false;
}
#JsonProperty("studentList")
public void setStudentList(List<Student> list) {
this.studentList = list;
}
}
class Student {
private String student;
private String type;
private String retro;
public Student(String student, String type, String retro) {
this.student = student;
this.type = type;
this.retro = retro;
}
public String getStudent() {
return student;
}
public void setStudent(String student) {
this.student = student;
}
public String getType() {
return type;
}
public void setType(String type) {
this.type = type;
}
public String getRetro() {
return retro;
}
public void setRetro(String retro) {
this.retro = retro;
}
}
class HelperTest{
public static void main(String[] args) throws JsonProcessingException {
DynamicJsonHelper dynamicJsonHelper = new DynamicJsonHelper();
String jsonString;
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
dynamicJsonHelper.setAccId("12345");
List<Student> list = Arrays.asList(new Student("s1", "t1", "r1"), new Student("s2", "t2", "r2"));
dynamicJsonHelper.setStudentList(list);
jsonString = mapper.writeValueAsString(dynamicJsonHelper);
System.out.println(jsonString);
}
}
After executing the program the output is as shown below:
{
"accId": "12345",
"isEnabled": false,
"studentList": [
{
"student": "s1",
"type": "t1",
"retro": "r1"
},
{
"student": "s2",
"type": "t2",
"retro": "r2"
}
]
}
You missed a point that you have to have third class and it must have property of type java.util.List or array and name list for your example.
e.g.
public class JsonHolder {
// appropriate Json/Jackson annotations ommitted
private String setAccId;
private String groupOf;
private boolean isEnabled;
private List<DynamicJsonHelper> list;
private String[] sort;
// .. getter/setters ...
}
then you have to create that object and when you created your DynamicJsonHelper put it into list or array.
After all you can serialize JsonHolder object and you will see your java List or Array as JSON array.
UPD: just note that in JSON structure like { ... } is an object and in Java there must be a class for it.
So, starting with JSON structure you posted
{
"setAccId":"12345",
"groupOf":null,
"isEnabled":false,
"list":[
{
"student":"jim",
"type":"S_A",
"retro":null
},
{
"student":"bob",
"type":"S_A",
"retro":null
}
],
"sort":[]
}
it is an object (let name it JsonHolder) with properties named setAcctId, groupOf, isEnabled, list, sort
So you have to have a Java class for it (similar as you did for your DynamicJsonHelper. You can use any #Json annotations you'd like to the same way (I omitted them and left for you). Even you will not have them Jackson or any other JSON serialiser will use property names in Java class by as default.
I mean as example your #JsonProperty("accId")
#JsonProperty("accId")
public void setAccId(String accId)
is not required as long as getter/setter/property named also getAcctId, setAcctId, acctId. Jackson will use that if there is no #JsonProperty annotation.
BTW it is better to do it as you did for code readability. :-)
Per your question:
list and sort properties in JSON are arrays. Jackson parses Java collections classes like List, Set or Arrays to JSON arrays.
Then according to required JSON structure list property is a such collection of DynamicJsonHelper objects you created. in Java class, List or Array is just your choice - use what is more suitable for you. I recommend to use a List rather than Array. Work with arrays in Java is not a good idea. :-)
So far you just created a Java class DynamicJsonHelper only for objects which must be in list property of JsonHolder object. What's left is to create that "JsonHolder" class and give that object to Jackson to serialize it into required JSON structure.
There are bunch of #Json annotations you can use to allow or not null or empty values, change property names, exclude Java class properties to be serialized and so, and so... All is up to you... good luck!
I need to write a method that takes some object, some field name fieldName that exists in the given object's class, and some field value value. The value is the JSON-serialized form of the field. That method shall take the value and deserialize it accordingly, something like this:
static void setField(Object obj, String fieldName, String value) throws Exception {
Field field = obj.getClass().getDeclaredField(fieldName)
Object valObj = objectMapper.readValue(value, field.getType());
field.set(obj, valObj);
}
(I actually only need to retrieve the deserialized value, and not set it again, but this makes it a better example.)
This works, as long as jackson's default deserialization is sufficient. Now let's assume I have a class with a custom (de)serializer:
class SomeDTO {
String foo;
#JsonSerialize(using = CustomInstantSerializer.class)
#JsonDeserialize(using = CustomInstantDeserializer.class)
Instant bar;
}
One possible solution would be to manually check for JsonDeserialize annotations. However, I really do not want to try to replicate whatever policies Jackson follows to decide what serializer to use, as that seems brittle (for example globally registered serializers).
Is there a good way to deserialize the value using the field's deserialization configuration defined in the DTO class? Maybe deserializing the value into the field's type while passing the field's annotations along to Jackson, so they get honored?
I managed to get a hold of an AnnotatedMember instance, which holds all the required information (JSON-annotations and reflective field- or setter/getter-access), but couldn't figure out how I would use it to deserialize a standalone value due to lack of documentation:
final JavaType dtoType = objectMapper.getTypeFactory().constructType(SomeDTO.class);
final BeanDescription description = objectMapper.getDeserializationConfig().introspect(dtoType);
for (BeanPropertyDefinition propDef: beanDescription.findProperties()) {
final AnnotatedMember mutator = propertyDefinition.getNonConstructorMutator();
// now what? Also: How do I filter for the correct property?
}
One possibility would be to serialize the object, replace the given field, and then deserialize it again. This can be easily done when serializing from/to JsonNode instead of JSON-String, like this:
static Object setField(Object obj, String fieldName, String value) throws Exception {
// note: produces a new object instead of modifying the existing one
JsonNode node = objectMapper.valueToTree(obj);
((ObjectNode) node).put(fieldName, value);
return objectMapper.readValue(node.traverse(), obj.getClass());
}
However, serializing and deserializing a whole object just to deserialize a single field seems like a lot of overhead, and might be brittle because other aspects of the DTO class affect the deserialization process of the single field
import com.fasterxml.jackson.core.JsonGenerator;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.core.JsonParser;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.core.JsonProcessingException;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.DeserializationContext;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.DeserializationFeature;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.JsonNode;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.SerializerProvider;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.annotation.JsonDeserialize;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.annotation.JsonSerialize;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.deser.std.StdDeserializer;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ser.std.StdSerializer;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.util.Map;
public final class Jackson {
private static final ObjectMapper OBJECT_MAPPER = new ObjectMapper()
.configure(DeserializationFeature.FAIL_ON_UNKNOWN_PROPERTIES, true);
public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException {
Dto source = makeDto("Master", 31337);
Dto dst = makeDto("Slave", 0xDEADBEEF);
//1. read value of field "fieldName" from json source
//2. clones destination object, sets up field "fieldName" and returns it
//3. in case of no field either on "src" or "dst" - throws an exception
Object result = restoreValue(dst, "details", OBJECT_MAPPER.writeValueAsString(source));
System.out.println(result);
}
private static Object restoreValue(Object targetObject, String fieldName, String sourceObjectAsJson) throws IOException {
String targetObjectAsJson = OBJECT_MAPPER.writeValueAsString(targetObject);
Map sourceAsMap = OBJECT_MAPPER.readValue(sourceObjectAsJson, Map.class);
Map targetAsMap = OBJECT_MAPPER.readValue(targetObjectAsJson, Map.class);
targetAsMap.put(fieldName, sourceAsMap.get(fieldName));
String updatedTargetAsJson = OBJECT_MAPPER.writeValueAsString(targetAsMap);
return OBJECT_MAPPER.readValue(updatedTargetAsJson, targetObject.getClass());
}
private static Dto makeDto(String name, int magic) {
Dto dto = new Dto();
dto.setName(name);
CustomDetails details = new CustomDetails();
details.setMagic(magic);
dto.setDetails(details);
return dto;
}
private static final class Dto {
private String name;
#JsonSerialize(using = CustomDetails.CustomDetailsSerializer.class)
#JsonDeserialize(using = CustomDetails.CustomDetailsDeserializer.class)
private CustomDetails details;
public String getName() {
return name;
}
public void setName(String name) {
this.name = name;
}
public CustomDetails getDetails() {
return details;
}
public void setDetails(CustomDetails details) {
this.details = details;
}
#Override
public String toString() {
return "Dto{" +
"name='" + name + '\'' +
", details=" + details +
'}';
}
}
private static final class CustomDetails {
private int magic;
public int getMagic() {
return magic;
}
public void setMagic(int magic) {
this.magic = magic;
}
#Override
public String toString() {
return "CustomDetails{" +
"magic=" + magic +
'}';
}
public static final class CustomDetailsSerializer extends StdSerializer<CustomDetails> {
public CustomDetailsSerializer() {
this(null);
}
public CustomDetailsSerializer(Class<CustomDetails> t) {
super(t);
}
#Override
public void serialize(CustomDetails details, JsonGenerator jg, SerializerProvider serializerProvider) throws IOException {
jg.writeStartObject();
jg.writeNumberField("_custom_property_magic", details.magic);
jg.writeEndObject();
}
}
private static final class CustomDetailsDeserializer extends StdDeserializer<CustomDetails> {
public CustomDetailsDeserializer() {
this(null);
}
public CustomDetailsDeserializer(Class<CustomDetails> t) {
super(t);
}
#Override
public CustomDetails deserialize(JsonParser jp, DeserializationContext deserializationContext) throws IOException, JsonProcessingException {
JsonNode node = jp.getCodec().readTree(jp);
int magic = (Integer) node.get("_custom_property_magic").numberValue();
CustomDetails
customDetails = new CustomDetails();
customDetails.setMagic(magic);
return customDetails;
}
}
}
}
so the output is:
Dto{name='Slave', details=CustomDetails{magic=31337}}
I'm trying to parse some Json into an Java object.
Some fields require custom behavior so i tried to use #JsonCreator on a constructor.
Well, it work, but for the other field annotate with #JsonProperty are not populated.
Didn't check yet, but i guess my object annotate with #JsonUnwrappedare not populated either.
In my search, i saw a comment that indicate that it is possible, but i can't figure how, if it is indeed possible.
There is around 400 field in the json, and only 5 or 6 that require custom behavior. So if i can avoid rewriting all constructor... that would be nice !
Exemple of what i tried :
public class MyObjectA {
#JsonProperty("keyField1")
private String myField1;
#JsonUnwrapped
private MyObjectB;
private String[] myField2;
#JsonCreator
public MyObjectA(final Map<String, Object> properties){
myField2 = ... //some Business logic
}
}
Junit :
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
MyObjectA result = mapper.readValue(getJsonInputStream(JSON_FILE_PATH),MyObjectA.class);
Assert.notNull(result.getMyField1(),"should be populated")
Assert.notNull(result.getMyField2(),"should be populated")
Assert.notNull(result.getMyObjectB(),"should be populated")
Note : without the constructor, the other field are well populated
Here it is. See the difference between commented and non commented #JsonConstructor usage. I am handling property something as custom handling and leaving name to be called using setName. Hope that helps
import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonCreator;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonProperty;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper;
import java.util.Map;
public class Jackson2 {
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
final ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
final String jsonInString = "{\"name\":\"hello world\",\"something\":\"from string\"}";
System.out.println(jsonInString);
Foo newFoo = mapper.readValue(jsonInString, Foo.class);
System.out.println(newFoo.getName());
System.out.println(newFoo.getSomething());
}
}
class Foo {
#JsonProperty
private String name;
private String something;
public String getSomething() {
return something;
}
public void setSomething(String something) {
this.something = something;
}
public String getName() {
return name;
}
public void setName(String name) {
this.name = name;
}
Foo() {
}
// #JsonCreator
public Foo(final Map<String, Object> properties) {
System.out.println("printing.."+properties);
something = "Something from constructor";
}
#JsonCreator
public Foo(#JsonProperty("something") String something ) {
System.out.println("printing.."+name);
this.something = "Something from constructor appended"+something;
}
}
So idea is that you use #JsonProperty in the constructor argument for properties you want to customize. :)
Let's say my POJO is limited to the following:
public class TestPojo {
StringProperty myField;
public TestPojo(){}
public TestPojo(String myField) {
this.myField = new SimpleStringProperty(myField);
}
public String getMyField() {
return this.myField.get();
}
public StringProperty myFieldProperty() {
return this.myField;
}
public void setMyField(String myField) {
this.myField.set(myField);
}
}
I want to deserialize with Jackson. Jackson doesn't seem to like StringProperty, because as a normal String it works as expected. So I write a custom deserializer...
public class StringPropertyDeserializer extends JsonDeserializer<StringProperty> {
public StringPropertyDeserializer() {}
#Override
public StringProperty deserialize(JsonParser jsonParser, DeserializationContext deserializationContext)
throws IOException, JsonProcessingException {
String value = jsonParser.readValueAs(String.class);
return new SimpleStringProperty(value);
}
}
And I add this annotation to my StringProperty field...
#JsonDeserialize(using = StringPropertyDeserializer.class)
I get the following error:
com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.JsonMappingException: Class com.test.example.TestPojo$StringPropertyDeserializer has no default (no arg) constructor
I added a default constructor into the deserializer (as you can see above) and I get the same error regardless of it being there. Any solutions? This seems like it should be simple.
Edit here is the actual code where I'm making the call if that's helpful...
#GET("/api/test")
Call<List<TestPojo>> testPojoCall();
And it's configured in Gradle like so:
compile group: 'com.squareup.retrofit2', name: 'converter-jackson', version: '2.1.0'
That is everything related to this code.
Your POJO implementation isn't correct: the no-arg constructor doesn't initialize the StringProperty. Consequently, if you use the no-arg constructor, then call setMyField(...) you'd get a null pointer exception. I'm guessing that trying to work around that was what led you to try creating the custom deserializer.
I'm not entirely sure why the custom deserializer is giving the error it's giving (maybe it doesn't like the fact that it's an inner class: that's just a guess).
The following works fine for me without any custom deserialization:
TestPojo.java:
package jxtest;
import javafx.beans.property.SimpleStringProperty;
import javafx.beans.property.StringProperty;
public class TestPojo {
private final StringProperty myField1 = new SimpleStringProperty();
private final StringProperty myField2 = new SimpleStringProperty();
private int myField3 ;
public final StringProperty myField1Property() {
return this.myField1;
}
public final String getMyField1() {
return this.myField1Property().get();
}
public final void setMyField1(final String myField1) {
this.myField1Property().set(myField1);
}
public final StringProperty myField2Property() {
return this.myField2;
}
public final String getMyField2() {
return this.myField2Property().get();
}
public final void setMyField2(final String myField2) {
this.myField2Property().set(myField2);
}
public int getMyField3() {
return myField3;
}
public void setMyField3(int myField3) {
this.myField3 = myField3;
}
}
Test.java:
package jxtest;
import java.io.IOException;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper;
public class Test {
public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException {
TestPojo item = new TestPojo();
item.setMyField1("Test1");
item.setMyField2("Test2");
item.setMyField3(42);
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
String json = mapper.writeValueAsString(item);
System.out.println(json);
TestPojo readBackIn = mapper.readValue(json, TestPojo.class);
System.out.println(readBackIn.getMyField1());
System.out.println(readBackIn.getMyField2());
System.out.println(readBackIn.getMyField3());
}
}
Output:
{"myField1":"Test1","myField2":"Test2","myField3":42}
Test1
Test2
42
Using jackson-databind 2.8.7.
I am glued with some Jackson polymorphic problem.
I work on a web JDR Character Editor personnal project. I use Springboot and try to stuck with the phylosophy. Moreover, I try to make some independent packages, because of study-case for my real work (another springboot project).
With no Jackson configuration, I have no problem for serialization of a Competence. But when I try to get back any modification on the web editor, so when Jackson make a deserialization of a Competence, problems occur with "dependance" property.
Here are my classes:
The one I try to serialize/deserialize:
public class Competence implements Composante, ComposanteTemplate {
public enum Categorie {
APPRENTI,
COMPAGNON
}
private String nom;
private String description;
private Categorie categorie;
private Chapitre chapitre;
private AttributTemplate dependance;
private List sousCompetences = new ArrayList();
public String getNom() {
return nom;
}
public void setNom(String nom) {
this.nom = nom;
}
public String getDescription() {
return description;
}
public void setDescription(String description) {
this.description = description;
}
public Competence getTemplate() {
return this;
}
public Categorie getCategorie() {
return categorie;
}
public void setCategorie(Categorie categorie) {
this.categorie = categorie;
}
public Chapitre getChapitre() {
return chapitre;
}
public void setChapitre(Chapitre chapitre) {
this.chapitre = chapitre;
}
public AttributTemplate getDependance() {
return dependance;
}
public void setDependance(AttributTemplate dependance) {
this.dependance = dependance;
}
public List getSousCompetences() {
return sousCompetences;
}
public void setSousCompetences(List sousCompetences) {
this.sousCompetences = sousCompetences;
}
public boolean isOuverte() {
return !sousCompetences.isEmpty();
}
}
The superclass of the property I have a problem with:
public interface AttributTemplate extends ComposanteTemplate {}
The two subclasses which could be use for Competence#dependance property:
public enum Carac implements AttributTemplate, Attribut {
FORT(Type.PHYSIQUE),
AGILE(Type.PHYSIQUE),
RESISTANT(Type.PHYSIQUE),
OBSERVATEUR(Type.PHYSIQUE),
SAVANT(Type.MENTALE),
RUSE(Type.MENTALE),
TALENTUEUX(Type.MENTALE),
CHARMEUR(Type.MENTALE);
public enum Type {
PHYSIQUE,
MENTALE
}
public final Type type;
public final String nom = name().toLowerCase();
private String description;
Carac(Type type) {
this.type = type;
}
#Override
public String getNom() { return nom; }
#Override
public String getDescription() { return description; }
#Override
public Carac getTemplate() { return this; }
public void setDescription(String description) { this.description = description; }
}
public enum ArtTemplate implements AttributTemplate {
ART_GUERRIER(2, 1),
ART_ETRANGE(1, 2),
ART_GUILDIEN(1, 1);
public static final String ART_PREFIX = "ART";
public final String nom = name().toLowerCase().replace("_", " ");
public final int nbCaracsPhysiques;
public final int nbCaracsMentales;
private String description;
ArtTemplate(int nbCaracsPhysiques, int nbCaracsMentales) {
this.nbCaracsMentales = nbCaracsMentales;
this.nbCaracsPhysiques = nbCaracsPhysiques;
}
#Override
public String getNom() {
return nom;
}
#Override
public String getDescription() {
return description;
}
public void setDescription(String description) {
this.description = description;
}
public int getNbCaracs() {
return nbCaracsPhysiques + nbCaracsMentales;
}
}
The result json (and then the json I send) is:
{"nom":"Comp_1489746646510","description":"ezbuixnwrclfvmgwdviubcauenzytpzzvumnohwyhpuynxaqhkjdbqygtrmbtlschthovuyoiolkauucwokkfjnaujnufshrjboykuqce","categorie":"APPRENTI","chapitre":"GUERRE","dependance":"ART_ETRANGE","ouverte":false,"sousCompetences":[]}
QUESTION:
I understand that my problem is caused by the abstract relation AttributTemplate, and then when Jackson try to deserialize, he does not know which of Carac or ArtTemplate class to use.
I try to keep unchanged Competence (Competence come from an external jar), so no annotation on this class is possible.
I've tried many of the solutions I found (Jackson 1.5: Polymorphic Type Handling, first steps ) and the only one which has worked was to define a DeserializationProblemHandler
mapper.addHandler(new DeserializationProblemHandler() {
#Override
public Object handleMissingInstantiator(DeserializationContext ctxt, Class<?> instClass, JsonParser p, String msg) throws IOException {
if (instClass == AttributTemplate.class) {
String name = p.getText();
return !name.startsWith(ArtTemplate.ART_PREFIX) ? Carac.valueOf(name) : ArtTemplate.valueOf(name);
}
return super.handleMissingInstantiator(ctxt, instClass, p, msg);
}
});
But I feel bad with this solution, because I am sure there is an other beautiful one.
So is it possible to configure the mapper in order that he is able to determine which of Carac or ArtTemplate he must use to get AttributTemplate?
EDIT:
I managed to have this:
{"nom":"Comp_1489756873433","description":"kruzueemlwisibshlkotasayfkhdqkqolvhlqgsnntndkpvbmmgklqysabiakaolempmupeyiqaztdcrhwimdksgzybbdzttwnwqjxhfo","categorie":"COMPAGNON","chapitre":"GUERRE","dependance":["mova.ged.perso.inne.Carac","AGILE"],"ouverte":true,"sousCompetences":[...]}
by configuring like this the mapper
abstract class CompetenceMixIn {
private AttributTemplate dependance;
#JsonTypeInfo(use=JsonTypeInfo.Id.CLASS, include=JsonTypeInfo.As.EXISTING_PROPERTY, property="dependance")
#JsonSubTypes({ #JsonSubTypes.Type(value = Carac.class, name = "carac"), #JsonSubTypes.Type(value = ArtTemplate.class, name = "artTemplate") })
public void setDependance(AttributTemplate dependance) {
this.dependance = dependance;
}
}
ObjectMapper mapper = jsonConverter.getObjectMapper();
mapper.addMixIn(Competence.class, CompetenceMixIn.class);
As you could see, I'm still parasited with the array that wrapped dependance value. I would (...)"dependance": "AGILE", (...) not (...)"dependance":["mova.ged.perso.inne.Carac", "AGILE"], (...)
And I don't know what to change in order to have this.
i have been looking into what you are trying to do. Unfortunatelly, I believe there are issues with Enums + inheritance.
I have an alternative solution that you could be using which is to use a custom creator and ignore unknown properties. See the following example:
public class JacksonInheritance {
public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException {
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
Competence c = new Competence();
c.desc = "desc";
c.nome = "nome";
c.template = Att1.TEST_Att1;
String test = mapper.writeValueAsString(c);
System.out.println(test);
Competence readValue = mapper.readValue(test, Competence.class);
System.out.println(readValue.template);
}
#JsonIgnoreProperties(ignoreUnknown = true)
public static class Competence {
private static final Map<String, AttributeTemplate> templates;
static {
templates = new HashMap<>();
Stream.of(Att1.values()).forEach( a -> templates.put(a.name(), a));
Stream.of(Att2.values()).forEach( a -> templates.put(a.name(), a));
}
#JsonProperty
String nome;
#JsonProperty
String desc;
#JsonIgnore
AttributeTemplate template;
#JsonProperty("template_type")
public String getTempl() {
// Here you can do whichever way uou would like to serialise your template. This will be the key
return template.toString();
}
#JsonCreator
public static Competence create(#JsonProperty("template_type") String templateType) {
Competence c = new Competence();
c.template = templates.get(templateType);
return c;
}
}
public static interface AttributeTemplate {
}
public static enum Att1 implements AttributeTemplate {
TEST_Att1;
}
public static enum Att2 implements AttributeTemplate {
TEST2_Att2;
}
}
Here I am detaching the enum logic from the jackson logic and implement my own. This does not require a custom serialisation.
I basically say that I serialise my enum as its value (you can obviously choose which ever properties you would like for this).
My output json then looks as:
{"template_type":"TEST_Att1","nome":"nome","desc":"desc"}
At the return step I now know that the information I need to construct the correct enum template type from the template_type attribute. This is what I can inject into my factory method create.
In the create I can use my statically created map to populate the correct enum into my object. We can just create this map statically since our enums are finite and static.
The beauty of this is also that the generator is only used for creation. Using #JsonIgnoreProperties(ignoreUnknown = true), we can tell jackson to not freak out by all our custom elements in the json. It will simply deserialise any fields it can detect and leave the other ones (since we are using a custom template_type for our enum resolution).
Finally, I am ignoring the actual template in my bean because jackson won't be able to construct that.
I hope that this works for you/helps you. Sorry about the delay.
Reason for not using inheritance:
There seem to be issues with enum + inheritance in jackson. Particularly jackson by default uses reflection and calls the private constructor of the enum for generation. You may be able to get creators to work in a similar way as above though.
The deserialisation expects the template. I am going of the assumption that you do NOT necessarily want to serialise all elements of the enum. This is because the enum name, in my case TEST_Att1 makes the enum unique. There is no need to serialise and send all the different attributes these enums have around. However, Deserialization with #JsonSubTypes for no value - missing property error shows that jackson requires your template field to be at least present. This is a a slight issue, because you want to use an external property for this instead (so why include a null-field as suggested in your json just to make jackson happy)
This may not be the best solution, but I think it is relatively elegant given the restrictions. I hope that helps you,
Artur