I am using a query parameters to set the values needed by the Google Maps API.
The issue is I do not need the & sign for the first query parameter.
#GET("/maps/api/geocode/json?")
Call<JsonObject> getLocationInfo(#Query("address") String zipCode,
#Query("sensor") boolean sensor,
#Query("client") String client,
#Query("signature") String signature);
Retrofit generates:
&address=90210&sensor=false&client=gme-client&signature=signkey
which causes the call the fail when I need it to be
address=90210&sensor=false&client=gme-client&signature=signkey
How do I fix this?
If you specify #GET("foobar?a=5"), then any #Query("b") must be appended using &, producing something like foobar?a=5&b=7.
If you specify #GET("foobar"), then the first #Query must be appended using ?, producing something like foobar?b=7.
That's how Retrofit works.
When you specify #GET("foobar?"), Retrofit thinks you already gave some query parameter, and appends more query parameters using &.
Remove the ?, and you will get the desired result.
I am new to retrofit and I am enjoying it. So here is a simple way to understand it for those that might want to query with more than one query: The ? and & are automatically added for you.
Interface:
public interface IService {
String BASE_URL = "https://api.test.com/";
String API_KEY = "SFSDF24242353434";
#GET("Search") //i.e https://api.test.com/Search?
Call<Products> getProducts(#Query("one") String one, #Query("two") String two,
#Query("key") String key)
}
It will be called this way. Considering you did the rest of the code already.
Call<Results> call = service.productList("Whatever", "here", IService.API_KEY);
For example, when a query is returned, it will look like this.
//-> https://api.test.com/Search?one=Whatever&two=here&key=SFSDF24242353434
Link to full project: Please star etc: https://github.com/Cosmos-it/ILoveZappos
If you found this useful, don't forget to star it please. :)
public interface IService {
String BASE_URL = "https://api.demo.com/";
#GET("Login") //i.e https://api.demo.com/Search?
Call<Products> getUserDetails(#Query("email") String emailID, #Query("password") String password)
}
It will be called this way. Considering you did the rest of the code already.
Call<Results> call = service.getUserDetails("abc#gmail.com", "Password#123");
For example when a query is returned, it will look like this.
https://api.demo.com/Login?email=abc#gmail.com&password=Password#123
Related
If i have something like
#GetMapping(value = "/list")
public ResponseEntity<MyDTO> findStatusPerEC(#RequestParam final List<Long> numbersEC)
How do I add numbersEC in my url on the frontend? Is this query parameter?
I know this one was for old call that didnĀ“t had query parameters and data was only a number (long)
return this.http.get<any>(URL_API + '/simulator/status/' + data);
But now I have to send a list of long values...may you help me?
return this.http.get<any>(URL_API + '/simulator/status/' + data);
Since you mentioned data is only a long type, what you are referring to here when you make the above request is a PathVariable it is slightly different to a RequestParam.
Path variables have the syntax: /simulator/status/:statusID where statusID is dynamic and extracts values from the URI.
Request parameters have the syntax: ?arg=val&arg2=val2 etc... and extract values from the request query string.
Solution
To answer your question, to send an array across as request parameters, you can do it like so:
?myparam=myValue1&myparam=myValue2&myparam=myValue3
As you can see, above myparam is unchanging, and the values are variable, hence the data within your list data structure.
So when you're making your request it will look similar to this:
Angular/Javascript
return this.http.get<any>(URL_API + '/list' + '?myparam=myValue1&myparam=myValue2&myparam=myValue3');
Java
#GetMapping(value = "/list")
public ResponseEntity<MyDTO> findStatusPerEC(#RequestParam final List<Long> numbersEC)
I hope this helps.
lets say I have a url param like token=1234235asdjaklj231k209a&name=sam&firname=Mahan
how can I replace the value of the token with new one ?
I've done something similar to this with pattern and matcher before but I don't recall now
but I know there is a way to do so
Update : the token can contain any letter but &
thanks in advance
Spring has a util that handles this need gracefully. Apache httpcomponents does too. Below is a spring example.
import org.springframework.web.util.UriComponentsBuilder;
import java.net.URI;
public class StackOverflow {
private static class SO46303058 {
public static void main(String[] args) {
final String urlString = "https://subdomain.hostname/path/resource?token=1234235asdjaklj231k209a&name=sam&firname=Mahan";
final URI uri = UriComponentsBuilder.fromHttpUrl(urlString)
.replaceQueryParam("token", "abc")
.build().toUri();
System.out.println(uri);
}
}
}
Don't be afraid of adding dependencies to your project, it beats reinventing the wheel.
We can consider doing a simple regex replacement, with a few caveats (q.v. below the code snippet).
String url = "token=1234235asdjaklj231k209a&name=sam&firname=Mahan";
url = url.replaceFirst("\\btoken=.*?(&|$)", "token=new_value$1");
System.out.println(url);
url = "param1=value&token=1234235asdjaklj231k209a";
url = url.replaceFirst("\\btoken=.*?(&|$)", "token=new_value$1");
System.out.println(url);
Edge cases to consider are first that your token may be the last parameter in the query string. To cover this case, we should check for token=... ending in either an ambersand & or the end of the string. But if we don't use a lookahead, and instead consume that ambersand, we have to also add it back in the replacement. The other edge case, correctly caught by #DodgyCodeException in his comment below, is that there be another query parameter which just happens to end in token. To make sure we are really matching our token parameter, we can preface it with a word boundary in the regex, i.e. use \btoken=... to refer to it.
Output:
token=new_value&name=sam&firname=Mahan
param1=value&token=new_value
make a viewModel.
public class veiwModel(){ String token ; // and get and set for exmample }
then use Gson if u have a json text .
Gson gson = new Gson();
yourViewModel = gson.fronJson(jsonText , viewModel.class);
System.out.println(yourViewModel.getToken());
I have Java POJO object and my goal is to convert it to URL parameters and use it in POST method.
...
public class PayseraRequest {
private int projectid = 123;
private int orderid = 987;
private String accepturl = "http://www.test.com";
...
My goal is convert object PayseraRequest to String urlParams
urlParams -> projectid=123&orderid=987&http%3A%2F%2Fwww.test.com&...`
Yes, write a method to do this, but you should URLEncode each parameter. projectid and orderid do not need URLencoding but it doesn't hurt. accepturl must definitely be UrlEncoded. It is good practice to encode anything you want to put into the query string of a URL.
See https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/index.html?java/net/URLEncoder.html
you can override the toString method of that class and with a say so StringBuilder get what you need.
You can check an example I have here:
https://github.com/lmpampaletakis/datumBoxSpringMVC/tree/master/datumBoxSpringMVC/src/main/java/com/lebab/datumbox
Your answer might be at SendRequest.java
You can replace the values of each parameter you want from your pojo
We are using RESTful Web Services (Jersey) for API calls on java. While API needs optional parameter, we are doing as:
api-interface/user/userid/9000/companyid/90909/{optionalparameter*}
and we have to call this api when there is no optional parameter as:
api-interface/user/userid/9000/companyid/90909/
What needed is:
Case:1 If optional parameter exists
api-interface/user/userid/9000/companyid/90909/name/john/address/MA/age/34
Case:2 If Optional parameter doesn't exists.
api-interface/user/userid/9000/companyid/90909
My present implementation is:
#GET
#Path("user/companyid/{companyid}/userid/{userid}/{optionalparameter:.*}")
#Produces(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
public Response getUserList(#PathParam("companyid") String companyId, #PathParam("userid") String userId,
#PathParam("optionalparameter") String syncDate) throws BadRequestException, InternalServerException {
//parsing the param.
}
In above code, I need to add trailing "/" but I am looking the way to remove this trailing "/" if anybody doesn't wants to pass those param.
I followed this link but it didn't worked while the preceding parameter's length is more then 1.
Please, Suggest me the best way.
Looking at your reference, have you tried this:
#Path("userid/{userid}/companyid/{companyid}{optparam:(/[^/]+?)*}")
public Response getLocation(
#PathParam("userid") int userid,
#PathParam("companyid") int companyid,
#PathParam("optparam") String optparam) {
String[] params = parseParams(optparam);
...
}
private String[] parseParams(String params) {
if (params.startsWith("/")) {
params = path.substring(1);
}
return params.split("/");
}
That should work, giving you all the parameters in a single array.
EDIT: I have updated the search string and verified it on a local install.
I write a little web API which should it make easy to create URIs. Each resource class should contain a method createURI which takes the needed parameters. This method should use a helper method, populateUriTemplate, in the background to create an URI string. populateUriTemplate needs key value pairs to populate an URI template. In another language like Scala or Python I would use named parameters, but Java doesn't support them. So the question is: How to simulate named parameters in Java?
The straight forward solution would be to create a map:
public String createUri(int id, String name){
Map<String, Object> params = new HashMap<String, Object>();
params.put("id", id);
params.put("name", name);
return populateUriTemplate(params);
}
But I don't like to create a map first and put each parameter to it.
Another idea is to use a static method, param, to create key value pairs:
public String createUri(int id, String name){
return populateUriTemplate(param("id", id), param("name", name));
}
Looks much better to me!
It could be refined a bit to make it more self-explanatory, even if a few more characters are needed:
public String createUri(int id, String name){
return populateUriTemplate(key("id").value(id), key("name").value(name));
}
I've also thought of the builder pattern, but this would force the user of my API to create an explicit builder for each resource class, what would be tedious without a benefit. The type of the parameter is not important, as long as a proper implemented toString method exists.
My favourite is one of the both approaches with the static methods above (param(key, value) or key(k).value(v)). Do you know a better way to simulate named parameters in this case?
For some ideas on the builder pattern, you could see this blog post by Stephan Schmidt.
You also just gave me the idea to do the following, with fluent interfaces, a Callable, and a static method:
createUri().id(5).name("dennetik").call();
Which would require createing a Callable class (CreateUri) with the static method:
public static final CreateUriFluentInterface createUri() {
return FluentInterface.of(new CreateUri(), CreateUriFluentInterface.class);
}
And a fluent interface, like this:
public interface CreateUriFluentInterface {
public CreateUriFluentInterface id(Integer id);
public CreateUriFluentInterface name(String name);
}
Which isn't that much boilerplate code, is it?
(Well, if you tone down that horribly named CreateUriFluentInterface a bit, it isn't.)
(You would probably have CreateUriFluentInterface extend Callable<String>, to be able to reroute the call to Callable#call())
populateUriTemplate("id",id, "name",name);
void populateUriTemplate(Object... nvs){
for(int i=0; i<nvs.length/2; i++)
....
}
Maybe you like this approach:
class Params {
private HashMap<String, Object> allParams = new HashMap<String,Object>();
public Params(ParamEntry...params) {
for( ParamEntry p : params ) {
allParams.put(p.name, p.value);
}
}
public getParam(String name) {
return allParams.get(name);
}
class ParamEntry {
public String name;
public Object value;
}
}
public String createUri(Params.ParamsEntry ... params){
return populateUriTemplate(new Params(params));
}
To call it use
createUri(new Param.ParamEntry("name", valueObject) );
Inside the populateUriTemplate...
just use params.get("name");
Spring MVC does exactly this. As well as being able to bind requests to specific methods in controller classes, you can bind request parameters to method parameters. You can have a look to see how it works, but basically it picks a strategy to map the right request parameter to the right method parameter.
You basically get something like:
public String createUri(#RequestParam int id, #RequestParam String name){
return populateUriTemplate(id, name);
}
This is almost silly and slightly off topic, but using Lombok's #Builder annotation takes this closer to the desired result.
Furthermore if the builder, builder method and build method names are changed to _ they almost disappear:
import static foo.Template._;
class Resource {
String createURI(String id, String name) {
return populateURITemplate(_.id(id).name(name)._());
}
String populateURITemplate(Template t ){
return t.id+"="+t.name;
}
}
#Builder(builderClassName = "_", builderMethodName = "_", buildMethodName = "_" )
class Template {
static _ _ = _();
String id;
String name;
}
Named parameters are not the way:
Named parameters do not make your code any cleaner in this case. I would argue that they make things more complex and error prone in Java because you lose type safety and you lose compiler warnings about identifiers that do not exist.
TypeSafe Immutable Fluent Builders:
I wrote an article on a UrlBuilder implementation earlier this year, it shows a type safe fluent interface that enforces order of construction for mandatory input and allows for optional parts with sane defaults as well.
Now I will be the first to admit that the approach I use is fairly verbose, but it is extremely productive once that initial price is paid. It works with dependency injection and is easily unit testable and most importantly is composable for specialization.
final URL url1 = new UrlBuilder().scheme("http").host("www.google.com").build();
System.out.println("url1 = " + url1);
final URL url2 = new UrlBuilder().scheme("https").userInfo("xkcd", "correcthorsebatterystaple").host("admin.xkcd.com").build();
System.out.println("url2 = " + url2);
Produces:
url1 = http://www.google.com
url2 = https://xkcd:correcthorsebatterystaple#admin.xkcd.com
I am addressing the verbosity of the anonymous inner class implementations of the interfaces with another approach I am experimenting with; type safe implementations of value objects from interfaces using dynamic proxies.
This will do away with the boilerplate value objects and replace them with Map<String,?> but put a dynamically generated type safe immutable Interface wrapper around them.
I encourage you to read about both of these and see how combining them gives you a better solution than named properties ever would.
When I get time to refactor my UrlBuilder with the dynamic proxies I will post another blog post about it as well.
Named Parameters via Guice
If you are dead set on named parameters then I would recommend looking at Guice #Named bindings. You still lose the compile type checks and safety but at least you get some validations from Guice.
public class RealBillingService implements BillingService {
#Inject
public RealBillingService(#Named("Checkout") CreditCardProcessor processor,
TransactionLog transactionLog) {
...
}