Dynamically change domain of JSESSIONID cookie?

Dynamically change domain of JSESSIONID cookie? - java

How can i dynamically change the domain of the JSESSIONID cookie that tomcat or jetty generates?
I stumbled accross this one:
Sharing session data between contexts in Tomcat
But i need to do this on request basis (the above is on context basis).
For example:
request1 comes from www.testdomain1.com and needs the domain ".testdomain1.com".
request2 comes from www.testdomain2.com and needs the domain ".testdomain2.com".
The domains are not known at deploy time and can change any time.
I used a simple servlet filter with a HttpServletResponseWrapper for cookies from my application, but JSESSIONID doesn't get intercepted by the filter (it's not generated by the webapp but by the container).
[edit] can't go the httpRequest.getSession().getServletContext().getSessionCookieConfig().setDomain() way, cause it seems the sessioncookieconfig is readonly after the context is initialized..
[edit] can't go with a tomcat valve cause the response is already commited (isCommitted is true). In addition tomcat doesn't use reponse addCookie or header methodes to set JSESSIONID cookie. And Response class is final so not wrapper can't be created for that one.
[edit] with jetty a custom SessionHandler is not working either, cause there is no access to the request object.
I highly suspect this entire thing is impossible. The only solution i can see is to put a proxy in front of the servlet container and change the cookie this way, but that is overkill.

In the next request that is after the session is created, get all the cookies
Cookie[] c = request.getCookies();
//for loop{
if(c.getName.equals("JSESSIONID")){
c.setDomain("....);
}
}

Related

cookies with <path>/</path> and JSESSIONID

I am experimenting with setting the cookie path in my application's web.xml (as suggested here) to:
<session-config>
<cookie-config>
<path>/</path>
</cookie-config>
</session-config>
So I deploy two identical web applications to localhost:8080/application-a and localhost:8080/application-b respectively.
Each application is a single servlet:
public class ControllerServlet extends HttpServlet{
#Override
public void doGet(HttpServletRequest req, HttpServletResponse res) throws ServletException, IOException {
HttpSession session = req.getSession(false);
if (session == null) {
session = req.getSession(true);
System.out.printf("No session was present - new one created with JSESSIONID=[%s]\n", session.getId());
} else {
System.out.printf("JSESSIONID cookie was present and HttpSession objects exists with JSESSIONID=[%s]\n", session.getId());
}
}
}
I deploy the apps to a Tomcat 8.5 container (tried with Tomcat 9 as well the behavior is the same). When I visit with my browser the application-a, here's what I see:
… and on the Tomcat logs I read:
No session was present - new one created with JSESSIONID=[A227B147A4027B7C37D31A4A62104DA9]
So far so good. When I then visit application-b here's what I see:
… and the Tomcat logs show:
No session was present - new one created with JSESSIONID=[5DC8554459233F726628875E22D57AD5]
This is also very well as explained here and also in this answer and I quote:
SRV.7.3 Session Scope
HttpSession objects must be scoped at the application (or servlet
context) level. The underlying mechanism, such as the cookie used to
establish the session, can be the same for different contexts, but the
object referenced, including the attributes in that object, must never
be shared between contexts by the container.
So even though on the request the JSESSIONID cookie was present, my application (the one deployed in application-b) was unable to find an HttpSession object in its own servlet context scope and so a new session object was created and a new value was assigned to the JSESSIONID cookie.
However, when I now go back to my application-a I find out that because of the / value configured for the cookie path, it is now trying to use the JSESSIONID value set by application-b and of course its servlet doesn't find such a session object in its own context (application-a) and so a new value for the JSESSIONID cookie is created which will in turn invalidate the session of the application-b application and so on and so forth ad infinitum as I switch back and forth between the two applications.
So my questions are:
1 given the above behavior it would seem impossible for two applications to use the same JSESSIONID cookie value as the key to their respective HttpSession objects. So in fact not only are the HttpSession objects always different and scoped at the application (servlet context) level but also, in practice, the JSESSIONID values have to be different. Is that correct?
2 If so, then why does the servlet specification use the wording:
The underlying mechanism, such as the cookie used to establish the
session, can be the same for different contexts [...]
The only way I can imagine the above could be accomplished would be to have a way to hardcodedly provide the JSESSIONID value to use when a new session object is created? But I don't see an API for that.
3 Is there a way I can have some other cookies be shared among applications using the / path in the <session-config> XML element but not have the / path apply to the JSESSIONID cookie? In other words does the <session-config> apply to all cookies of an application or only the cookie used for session tracking? (JSESSIONID) ?

Upon further experimentation and taking a cue from this answer it would appear that for the same JSESSIONID to be used for all web applications it is necessary to set the following attribute in context.xml:
<Context ... sessionCookiePath="/">
Either the Tomcat-wide context.xml or the WAR-specific context.xml will do. The <cookie-config><path> value configured in the WAR's web.xml is apparently ignored.
Regarding point 3 of my question I 've found that the way to set paths for other cookies is to programmatically create many of them, one for each path, and add them in the response object with the addCookie method. The configurations in web.xml or context.xml are appicable to other cookies beyond the session cookie.

request.setAttribute("name",name); is not working when project is run in 2nd time [duplicate]

Suppose, I have a webserver which holds numerous servlets. For information passing among those servlets I am setting session and instance variables.
Now, if 2 or more users send request to this server then what happens to the session variables?
Will they all be common for all the users or they will be different for each user?
If they are different, then how was the server able to differentiate between different users?
One more similar question, if there are n users accessing a particular servlet, then this servlet gets instantiated only the first time the first user accessed it or does it get instantiated for all the users separately?
In other words, what happens to the instance variables?

ServletContext
When the servlet container (like Apache Tomcat) starts up, it will deploy and load all its web applications. When a web application is loaded, the servlet container creates the ServletContext once and keeps it in the server's memory. The web app's web.xml and all of included web-fragment.xml files is parsed, and each <servlet>, <filter> and <listener> found (or each class annotated with #WebServlet, #WebFilter and #WebListener respectively) will be instantiated once and be kept in the server's memory as well, registred via the ServletContext. For each instantiated filter, its init() method is invoked with a new FilterConfig argument which in turn contains the involved ServletContext.
When a Servlet has a <servlet><load-on-startup> or #WebServlet(loadOnStartup) value greater than 0, then its init() method is also invoked during startup with a new ServletConfig argument which in turn contains the involved ServletContext. Those servlets are initialized in the same order specified by that value (1 is 1st, 2 is 2nd, etc). If the same value is specified for more than one servlet, then each of those servlets is loaded in the same order as they appear in the web.xml, web-fragment.xml, or #WebServlet classloading. In the event the "load-on-startup" value is absent, the init() method will be invoked whenever the HTTP request hits that servlet for the very first time.
When the servlet container is finished with all of the above described initialization steps, then the ServletContextListener#contextInitialized() will be invoked with a ServletContextEvent argument which in turn contains the involved ServletContext. This will allow the developer the opportunity to programmatically register yet another Servlet, Filter or Listener.
When the servlet container shuts down, it unloads all web applications, invokes the destroy() method of all its initialized servlets and filters, and all Servlet, Filter and Listener instances registered via the ServletContext are trashed. Finally the ServletContextListener#contextDestroyed() will be invoked and the ServletContext itself will be trashed.
HttpServletRequest and HttpServletResponse
The servlet container is attached to a web server that listens for HTTP requests on a certain port number (port 8080 is usually used during development and port 80 in production). When a client (e.g. user with a web browser, or programmatically using URLConnection) sends an HTTP request, the servlet container creates new HttpServletRequest and HttpServletResponse objects and passes them through any defined Filter in the chain and, eventually, the Servlet instance.
In the case of filters, the doFilter() method is invoked. When the servlet container's code calls chain.doFilter(request, response), the request and response continue on to the next filter, or hit the servlet if there are no remaining filters.
In the case of servlets, the service() method is invoked. By default, this method determines which one of the doXxx() methods to invoke based off of request.getMethod(). If the determined method is absent from the servlet, then an HTTP 405 error is returned in the response.
The request object provides access to all of the information about the HTTP request, such as its URL, headers, query string and body. The response object provides the ability to control and send the HTTP response the way you want by, for instance, allowing you to set the headers and the body (usually with generated HTML content from a JSP file). When the HTTP response is committed and finished, both the request and response objects are recycled and made available for reuse.
HttpSession
When a client visits the webapp for the first time and/or the HttpSession is obtained for the first time via request.getSession(), the servlet container creates a new HttpSession object, generates a long and unique ID (which you can get by session.getId()), and stores it in the server's memory. The servlet container also sets a Cookie in the Set-Cookie header of the HTTP response with JSESSIONID as its name and the unique session ID as its value.
As per the HTTP cookie specification (a contract any decent web browser and web server must adhere to), the client (the web browser) is required to send this cookie back in subsequent requests in the Cookie header for as long as the cookie is valid (i.e. the unique ID must refer to an unexpired session and the domain and path are correct). Using your browser's built-in HTTP traffic monitor, you can verify that the cookie is valid (press F12 in Chrome / Firefox 23+ / IE9+, and check the Net/Network tab). The servlet container will check the Cookie header of every incoming HTTP request for the presence of the cookie with the name JSESSIONID and use its value (the session ID) to get the associated HttpSession from server's memory.
The HttpSession stays alive until it has been idle (i.e. not used in a request) for more than the timeout value specified in <session-timeout>, a setting in web.xml. The timeout value defaults to 30 minutes. So, when the client doesn't visit the web app for longer than the time specified, the servlet container trashes the session. Every subsequent request, even with the cookie specified, will not have access to the same session anymore; the servlet container will create a new session.
On the client side, the session cookie stays alive for as long as the browser instance is running. So, if the client closes the browser instance (all tabs/windows), then the session is trashed on the client's side. In a new browser instance, the cookie associated with the session wouldn't exist, so it would no longer be sent. This causes an entirely new HttpSession to be created, with an entirely new session cookie being used.
In a nutshell
The ServletContext lives for as long as the web app lives. It is shared among all requests in all sessions.
The HttpSession lives for as long as the client is interacting with the web app with the same browser instance, and the session hasn't timed out at the server side. It is shared among all requests in the same session.
The HttpServletRequest and HttpServletResponse live from the time the servlet receives an HTTP request from the client, until the complete response (the web page) has arrived. It is not shared elsewhere.
All Servlet, Filter and Listener instances live as long as the web app lives. They are shared among all requests in all sessions.
Any attribute that is defined in ServletContext, HttpServletRequest and HttpSession will live as long as the object in question lives. The object itself represents the "scope" in bean management frameworks such as JSF, CDI, Spring, etc. Those frameworks store their scoped beans as an attribute of its closest matching scope.
Thread Safety
That said, your major concern is possibly thread safety. You should now know that servlets and filters are shared among all requests. That's the nice thing about Java, it's multithreaded and different threads (read: HTTP requests) can make use of the same instance. It would otherwise be too expensive to recreate, init() and destroy() them for every single request.
You should also realize that you should never assign any request or session scoped data as an instance variable of a servlet or filter. It will be shared among all other requests in other sessions. That's not thread-safe! The below example illustrates this:
public class ExampleServlet extends HttpServlet {
private Object thisIsNOTThreadSafe;
protected void doGet(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response) throws ServletException, IOException {
Object thisIsThreadSafe;
thisIsNOTThreadSafe = request.getParameter("foo"); // BAD!! Shared among all requests!
thisIsThreadSafe = request.getParameter("foo"); // OK, this is thread safe.
}
}
See also:
What is the difference between JSF, Servlet and JSP?
Best option for Session management in Java
Difference between / and /* in servlet mapping url pattern
doGet and doPost in Servlets
Servlet seems to handle multiple concurrent browser requests synchronously
Why Servlets are not thread Safe?

Sessions
In short: the web server issues a unique identifier to each visitor on his first visit. The visitor must bring back that ID for him to be recognised next time around. This identifier also allows the server to properly segregate objects owned by one session against that of another.
Servlet Instantiation
If load-on-startup is false:
If load-on-startup is true:
Once he's on the service mode and on the groove, the same servlet will work on the requests from all other clients.
Why isn't it a good idea to have one instance per client? Think about this: Will you hire one pizza guy for every order that came? Do that and you'd be out of business in no time.
It comes with a small risk though. Remember: this single guy holds all the order information in his pocket: so if you're not cautious about thread safety on servlets, he may end up giving the wrong order to a certain client.

Session in Java servlets is the same as session in other languages such as PHP. It is unique to the user. The server can keep track of it in different ways such as cookies, url rewriting etc. This Java doc article explains it in the context of Java servlets and indicates that exactly how session is maintained is an implementation detail left to the designers of the server. The specification only stipulates that it must be maintained as unique to a user across multiple connections to the server. Check out this article from Oracle for more information about both of your questions.
Edit There is an excellent tutorial here on how to work with session inside of servlets. And here is a chapter from Sun about Java Servlets, what they are and how to use them. Between those two articles, you should be able to answer all of your questions.

When the servlet container (like Apache Tomcat) starts up, it will read from the web.xml file (only one per application) if anything goes wrong or shows up an error at container side console, otherwise, it will deploy and load all web applications by using web.xml (so named it as deployment descriptor).
During instantiation phase of the servlet, servlet instance is ready but it cannot serve the client request because it is missing with two pieces of information:
1: context information
2: initial configuration information
Servlet engine creates servletConfig interface object encapsulating the above missing information into it
servlet engine calls init() of the servlet by supplying servletConfig object references as an argument. Once init() is completely executed servlet is ready to serve the client request.
Q) In the lifetime of servlet how many times instantiation and initialization happens ??
A)only once (for every client request a new thread is created)
only one instance of the servlet serves any number of the client request ie, after serving one client request server does not die. It waits for other client requests ie what CGI (for every client request a new process is created) limitation is overcome with the servlet (internally servlet engine creates the thread).
Q)How session concept works?
A)whenever getSession() is called on HttpServletRequest object
Step 1: request object is evaluated for incoming session ID.
Step 2: if ID not available a brand new HttpSession object is created and its corresponding session ID is generated (ie of HashTable) session ID is stored into httpservlet response object and the reference of HttpSession object is returned to the servlet (doGet/doPost).
Step 3: if ID available brand new session object is not created session ID is picked up from the request object search is made in the collection of sessions by using session ID as the key.
Once the search is successful session ID is stored into HttpServletResponse and the existing session object references are returned to the doGet() or doPost() of UserDefineservlet.
Note:
1)when control leaves from servlet code to client don't forget that session object is being held by servlet container ie, the servlet engine
2)multithreading is left to servlet developers people for implementing ie., handle the multiple requests of client nothing to bother about multithread code
Inshort form:
A servlet is created when the application starts (it is deployed on the servlet container) or when it is first accessed (depending on the load-on-startup setting)
when the servlet is instantiated, the init() method of the servlet is called
then the servlet (its one and only instance) handles all requests (its service() method being called by multiple threads). That's why it is not advisable to have any synchronization in it, and you should avoid instance variables of the servlet
when the application is undeployed (the servlet container stops), the destroy() method is called.

Sessions - what Chris Thompson said.
Instantiation - a servlet is instantiated when the container receives the first request mapped to the servlet (unless the servlet is configured to load on startup with the <load-on-startup> element in web.xml). The same instance is used to serve subsequent requests.

The Servlet Specification JSR-315 clearly defines the web container behavior in the service (and doGet, doPost, doPut etc.) methods (2.3.3.1 Multithreading Issues, Page 9):
A servlet container may send concurrent requests through the service
method of the servlet. To handle the requests, the Servlet Developer
must make adequate provisions for concurrent processing with multiple
threads in the service method.
Although it is not recommended, an alternative for the Developer is to
implement the SingleThreadModel interface which requires the container
to guarantee that there is only one request thread at a time in the
service method. A servlet container may satisfy this requirement by
serializing requests on a servlet, or by maintaining a pool of servlet
instances. If the servlet is part of a Web application that has been
marked as distributable, the container may maintain a pool of servlet
instances in each JVM that the application is distributed across.
For servlets not implementing the SingleThreadModel interface, if the
service method (or methods such as doGet or doPost which are
dispatched to the service method of the HttpServlet abstract class)
has been defined with the synchronized keyword, the servlet container
cannot use the instance pool approach, but must serialize requests
through it. It is strongly recommended that Developers not synchronize
the service method (or methods dispatched to it) in these
circumstances because of detrimental effects on performance

No. Servlets are not Thread safe
This is allows accessing more than one threads at a time
if u want to make it Servlet as Thread safe ., U can go for
Implement SingleThreadInterface(i)
which is a blank Interface there is no
methods
or we can go for synchronize methods
we can make whole service method as synchronized by using synchronized
keyword in front of method
Example::
public Synchronized class service(ServletRequest request,ServletResponse response)throws ServletException,IOException
or we can the put block of the code in the Synchronized block
Example::
Synchronized(Object)
{
----Instructions-----
}
I feel that Synchronized block is better than making the whole method
Synchronized

As is clear from above explanations, by implementing the SingleThreadModel, a servlet can be assured thread-safety by the servlet container. The container implementation can do this in 2 ways:
1) Serializing requests (queuing) to a single instance - this is similar to a servlet NOT implementing SingleThreadModel BUT synchronizing the service/ doXXX methods; OR
2) Creating a pool of instances - which's a better option and a trade-off between the boot-up/initialization effort/time of the servlet as against the restrictive parameters (memory/ CPU time) of the environment hosting the servlet.

Session management in Dropwizard 0.8.x

Can someone give me insight of how do I implement session management in Dropwizard 0.8.x or above. I was using Dropwizard 0.7.0 till now and working perfectly in it. But I really confused by change docs provided when I migrated to 0.8.x.
In Dropwizard 0.7.0 (which I was using previously) it was done like the following
/*MainApplication.class session handler */
environment.jersey().register(HttpSessionProvider.class);
environment.servlets().setSessionHandler(new SessionHandler());
/*Resource.class session check*/
HttpSession session = httpServletRequest.getSession(true);
But it does not seems working anymore, precisely saying HttpSessionProvider.class is not there and replaced by some other implementations.
It would be really helpful someone show to what this is changed to.
Thanks.

The reason this isn't working for you is because you need to set the cookie in the response. I noticed this while looking into enabling session state for a dropwizard application where the underlying cookie gets created on the Jetty Response object but it never makes it's way onto the Jersey Response object and therefor gets dropped.
What I've done to work around this issue is to implement a Filter that extracts the "Set-Cookie" information from Jetty and puts it onto the outbound response object.
String cookie = HttpConnection.
getCurrentConnection()
.getHttpChannel()
.getResponse()
.getHttpFields().get(HttpHeader.SET_COOKIE.asString());
if (LOG.isDebugEnabled()) {
LOG.debug("Adding session cookie to response for subsequent requests {}", cookie);
}
httpServletResponse.addHeader(HttpHeader.SET_COOKIE.asString(), cookie);

#Yashwanth Krishnan
I know this is old but I noticed that the session was not maintained from one URL to another, simply add this code when you init the application, session handling is mostly a container thing and not specific to DropWizard.
SessionHandler sessionHandler = new SessionHandler();
sessionHandler.getSessionManager().setMaxInactiveInterval(SOME_NUMBER);
/**
* By default the session manager tracks sessions by URL and Cookies, we
* want to track by cookies only since
* we are doing a validation on all the app not URL by URL.
*/
sessionHandler.getSessionManager().setSessionTrackingModes(EnumSet.of(SessionTrackingMode.COOKIE));
environment.servlets().setSessionHandler(sessionHandler);

servlet container managed bean [duplicate]

Suppose, I have a webserver which holds numerous servlets. For information passing among those servlets I am setting session and instance variables.
Now, if 2 or more users send request to this server then what happens to the session variables?
Will they all be common for all the users or they will be different for each user?
If they are different, then how was the server able to differentiate between different users?
One more similar question, if there are n users accessing a particular servlet, then this servlet gets instantiated only the first time the first user accessed it or does it get instantiated for all the users separately?
In other words, what happens to the instance variables?

Sessions
In short: the web server issues a unique identifier to each visitor on his first visit. The visitor must bring back that ID for him to be recognised next time around. This identifier also allows the server to properly segregate objects owned by one session against that of another.
Servlet Instantiation
If load-on-startup is false:
If load-on-startup is true:
Once he's on the service mode and on the groove, the same servlet will work on the requests from all other clients.
Why isn't it a good idea to have one instance per client? Think about this: Will you hire one pizza guy for every order that came? Do that and you'd be out of business in no time.
It comes with a small risk though. Remember: this single guy holds all the order information in his pocket: so if you're not cautious about thread safety on servlets, he may end up giving the wrong order to a certain client.

Session in Java servlets is the same as session in other languages such as PHP. It is unique to the user. The server can keep track of it in different ways such as cookies, url rewriting etc. This Java doc article explains it in the context of Java servlets and indicates that exactly how session is maintained is an implementation detail left to the designers of the server. The specification only stipulates that it must be maintained as unique to a user across multiple connections to the server. Check out this article from Oracle for more information about both of your questions.
Edit There is an excellent tutorial here on how to work with session inside of servlets. And here is a chapter from Sun about Java Servlets, what they are and how to use them. Between those two articles, you should be able to answer all of your questions.

When the servlet container (like Apache Tomcat) starts up, it will read from the web.xml file (only one per application) if anything goes wrong or shows up an error at container side console, otherwise, it will deploy and load all web applications by using web.xml (so named it as deployment descriptor).
During instantiation phase of the servlet, servlet instance is ready but it cannot serve the client request because it is missing with two pieces of information:
1: context information
2: initial configuration information
Servlet engine creates servletConfig interface object encapsulating the above missing information into it
servlet engine calls init() of the servlet by supplying servletConfig object references as an argument. Once init() is completely executed servlet is ready to serve the client request.
Q) In the lifetime of servlet how many times instantiation and initialization happens ??
A)only once (for every client request a new thread is created)
only one instance of the servlet serves any number of the client request ie, after serving one client request server does not die. It waits for other client requests ie what CGI (for every client request a new process is created) limitation is overcome with the servlet (internally servlet engine creates the thread).
Q)How session concept works?
A)whenever getSession() is called on HttpServletRequest object
Step 1: request object is evaluated for incoming session ID.
Step 2: if ID not available a brand new HttpSession object is created and its corresponding session ID is generated (ie of HashTable) session ID is stored into httpservlet response object and the reference of HttpSession object is returned to the servlet (doGet/doPost).
Step 3: if ID available brand new session object is not created session ID is picked up from the request object search is made in the collection of sessions by using session ID as the key.
Once the search is successful session ID is stored into HttpServletResponse and the existing session object references are returned to the doGet() or doPost() of UserDefineservlet.
Note:
1)when control leaves from servlet code to client don't forget that session object is being held by servlet container ie, the servlet engine
2)multithreading is left to servlet developers people for implementing ie., handle the multiple requests of client nothing to bother about multithread code
Inshort form:
A servlet is created when the application starts (it is deployed on the servlet container) or when it is first accessed (depending on the load-on-startup setting)
when the servlet is instantiated, the init() method of the servlet is called
then the servlet (its one and only instance) handles all requests (its service() method being called by multiple threads). That's why it is not advisable to have any synchronization in it, and you should avoid instance variables of the servlet
when the application is undeployed (the servlet container stops), the destroy() method is called.

Sessions - what Chris Thompson said.
Instantiation - a servlet is instantiated when the container receives the first request mapped to the servlet (unless the servlet is configured to load on startup with the <load-on-startup> element in web.xml). The same instance is used to serve subsequent requests.

The Servlet Specification JSR-315 clearly defines the web container behavior in the service (and doGet, doPost, doPut etc.) methods (2.3.3.1 Multithreading Issues, Page 9):
A servlet container may send concurrent requests through the service
method of the servlet. To handle the requests, the Servlet Developer
must make adequate provisions for concurrent processing with multiple
threads in the service method.
Although it is not recommended, an alternative for the Developer is to
implement the SingleThreadModel interface which requires the container
to guarantee that there is only one request thread at a time in the
service method. A servlet container may satisfy this requirement by
serializing requests on a servlet, or by maintaining a pool of servlet
instances. If the servlet is part of a Web application that has been
marked as distributable, the container may maintain a pool of servlet
instances in each JVM that the application is distributed across.
For servlets not implementing the SingleThreadModel interface, if the
service method (or methods such as doGet or doPost which are
dispatched to the service method of the HttpServlet abstract class)
has been defined with the synchronized keyword, the servlet container
cannot use the instance pool approach, but must serialize requests
through it. It is strongly recommended that Developers not synchronize
the service method (or methods dispatched to it) in these
circumstances because of detrimental effects on performance

No. Servlets are not Thread safe
This is allows accessing more than one threads at a time
if u want to make it Servlet as Thread safe ., U can go for
Implement SingleThreadInterface(i)
which is a blank Interface there is no
methods
or we can go for synchronize methods
we can make whole service method as synchronized by using synchronized
keyword in front of method
Example::
public Synchronized class service(ServletRequest request,ServletResponse response)throws ServletException,IOException
or we can the put block of the code in the Synchronized block
Example::
Synchronized(Object)
{
----Instructions-----
}
I feel that Synchronized block is better than making the whole method
Synchronized

As is clear from above explanations, by implementing the SingleThreadModel, a servlet can be assured thread-safety by the servlet container. The container implementation can do this in 2 ways:
1) Serializing requests (queuing) to a single instance - this is similar to a servlet NOT implementing SingleThreadModel BUT synchronizing the service/ doXXX methods; OR
2) Creating a pool of instances - which's a better option and a trade-off between the boot-up/initialization effort/time of the servlet as against the restrictive parameters (memory/ CPU time) of the environment hosting the servlet.

Confusion about how java web session handeling works. Demystifying Cookies and Header differences using servlet api and HttpSession object

I am learning Spring security and Spring MVC, but I realized I needed to learn jsp Servlets first and general web programming in a java environment.
I have confusions surrounding the HttpServletRequest and HttpServletResponse objects and how they can be used to add headers to the request and response objects and how they relate to sessions.
As far as I understand, a cookie is a type of header just like Content-type and Accept.
The java servlet api just makes it easy to work with the header by using methods specific to the context in which the header is being used. For example:
response.setContentType(String mimeType)
response.setContentLength(int lengthInBytes)
My confusion starts here.. Cookie is not a String or int, its a object:
response.addCookie(Cookie cookie)
response.getCookies()
Since a cookie is a type of header, can't I just use something like this:
String cookieVal = response.getHeader("cookie")
I'm having difficulty understanding session management and how it relates to the HttpServletRequest and HttpServletResponse API.. What is the HttpSession object for?
HttpSession.getAttribute() // What is this getting??
HttpSession.setAttribute("Bla Bla", "valuetoset") // What is this setting?

You can read the RFC describing Cookies and the related headers, Set-Cookie and Cookie to understand what they are.
You can go through Chapter 7 of the Servlet Specification if you want to understand in detail how Cookies and Sessions are related.
You first need to understand that HTTP is a stateless protocol. This means that each request that a client makes has no relation to any previous or future requests. However, as users, we very much want some state when interacting with a web application. A bank application, for example, only wants you to be able to see and manage your transactions. A music streaming website might want to recommend some good beats based on what you've already heard.
To achieve this, the Cookie and Session concepts were introduced. Cookies are key-value pairs, but with a specific format (see the links). Sessions are server-side entities that store information (in memory or persisted) that spans multiple requests/responses between the server and the client.
The Servlet HTTP session uses a cookie with the name JSESSIONID and a value that identifies the session.
The Servlet container keeps a map (YMMV) of HttpSession objects and these identifiers. When a client first makes a request, the server creates an HttpSession object with a unique identifier and stores it in its map. It then adds a Set-Cookie header in the response. It sets the cookie's name to JSESSIONID and its value to the identifier it just created.
This is the most basic Cookie that a server uses. You can set any number of them with any information you wish. The Servlet API makes that a little simpler for you with the HttpServletResponse#addCookie(Cookie) method but you could do it yourself with the HttpServletResponse#addHeader(String, String) method.
The client receives these cookies and can store them somewhere, typically in a text file. When sending a new request to the server, it can use that cookie in the request's Cookie header to notify the server that it might have done a previous request.
When the Servlet container receives the request, it extracts the Cookie header value and tries to retrieve an HttpSession object from its map by using the key in the JSESSIONID cookie. This HttpSession object is then attached to the HttpServletRequest object that the Servlet container creates and passes to your Servlet. You can use the setAttribute(String, Object) and getAttribute(String) methods to manage state.

You are correct that cookies are managed using headers. There are TWO cookie management related headers: Cookie and Set-Cookie.
Cookie header is sent by the user agent (browser) and will be available in your HttpServletRequest object and the Set-Cookie header is appended to your HttpServletResponse object when you use methods such as addCookie(Cookie).
In Java an HttpSession is established when the first request reaches your application. The Servlet Spec implementation in your container (Jetty, Tomcat, WebSphere, etc) will create and manage the HttpSession. The browser will receive a JSESSIONID cookie which will identify this particular session in the future.

Agreeing with the answers given above, I would like to conclude that Cookie and Session are two different entities in the world of web.
Cookie
Cookie represents some brief information that's generated by server and stored on client(browser). According to HTTP mechanism, browser have to send all the cookies(that have not expired), that server had sent before to browser.
Session
HTTP is a stateless protocol. Unlike FTP and other protocol, where connection state is preserved between multiple request-response transaction, in HTTP connection is established for one request and it's closed when response for that request is satisfied. This flaw in HTTP is present, because it was designed in early days to serve static web pages only. But as web has expanded, it's now used to serve dynamic full-fledged webapps. Thus, it has become necessary to identify users. Thus, for every request served by web-server, a labeling mechanism is required which can identify user of each request. This identification of user of request(whether the request has came from same user, same machine), sessions are used.
Session can be successfully implemented only if web-server can receive any information about the user in the request. One way of making this information available to user is Cookie. Others are URL rewriting, hidden fields, etc.
session.setAttribute() will store information in current session on server side not on client side(browser).
Hope it may help you.

Ok Looks like you want to see the difference between Cookies and Headers. They have different purpose. Cookies are temporary storage of information on client side. Server set the cookies(data) on the response and once set browser send these cookies(data) with each subsequent requests till the cookie expires. But headers are used as hints to browser and server. For ex
setHeader("Content-Type", "application/json");
will inform client to prepare to see a json response in the payload. Since it is a "one time" information there is not need the browser to send that information back to the server with each new requests like cookies.

Develop Reference

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995.