Develop Reference

EJB : understanding how container choose bean

I'm trying to understand how statefull beans works (I read the theoretical part and I know the difference between statfull and statelss beans ...), for that reason I created a statefull bean and a rest API to access it.
I find out that the container create/instantiate a new bean for every request.
then I used a servlet to access the same statfull bean, and this time the container crate just one bean that serves all requests.
So my questions are :
why does the container create many bean for rest API ?? I know that it consider each request as a separate client but how it knows, since rest API or servlet are accessed using http requests??
why it consider request when it comes from servlet as one client?? (therefor it create one bean)
in my case (doing test localy) how to force the container to create more beans (how to simulate more than one client) when using servlet.
Thank you in advance

I checked the specs, but I could not find something about this. But that seems reasonable:
Somebody must take care about the SFSB instance, closing it when done.
When exposing an EJB business method of a SFSB as REST service, a generic servlet is used. The only scope available is the request scope of a single (stateless) HTTP call, so after the call is done, the generic servlet should close the SFSB.
The servlet has an explicit lifecycle. An injected EJB is create during initialisation of the servlet and can be closed on destroy.
You can lookup new SFSB instances with every HTTP session created, using the session context for subsequent calls on this session and closing the SFSB when the matching session is closed.

request.setAttribute("name",name); is not working when project is run in 2nd time [duplicate]

Suppose, I have a webserver which holds numerous servlets. For information passing among those servlets I am setting session and instance variables.
Now, if 2 or more users send request to this server then what happens to the session variables?
Will they all be common for all the users or they will be different for each user?
If they are different, then how was the server able to differentiate between different users?
One more similar question, if there are n users accessing a particular servlet, then this servlet gets instantiated only the first time the first user accessed it or does it get instantiated for all the users separately?
In other words, what happens to the instance variables?

ServletContext
When the servlet container (like Apache Tomcat) starts up, it will deploy and load all its web applications. When a web application is loaded, the servlet container creates the ServletContext once and keeps it in the server's memory. The web app's web.xml and all of included web-fragment.xml files is parsed, and each <servlet>, <filter> and <listener> found (or each class annotated with #WebServlet, #WebFilter and #WebListener respectively) will be instantiated once and be kept in the server's memory as well, registred via the ServletContext. For each instantiated filter, its init() method is invoked with a new FilterConfig argument which in turn contains the involved ServletContext.
When a Servlet has a <servlet><load-on-startup> or #WebServlet(loadOnStartup) value greater than 0, then its init() method is also invoked during startup with a new ServletConfig argument which in turn contains the involved ServletContext. Those servlets are initialized in the same order specified by that value (1 is 1st, 2 is 2nd, etc). If the same value is specified for more than one servlet, then each of those servlets is loaded in the same order as they appear in the web.xml, web-fragment.xml, or #WebServlet classloading. In the event the "load-on-startup" value is absent, the init() method will be invoked whenever the HTTP request hits that servlet for the very first time.
When the servlet container is finished with all of the above described initialization steps, then the ServletContextListener#contextInitialized() will be invoked with a ServletContextEvent argument which in turn contains the involved ServletContext. This will allow the developer the opportunity to programmatically register yet another Servlet, Filter or Listener.
When the servlet container shuts down, it unloads all web applications, invokes the destroy() method of all its initialized servlets and filters, and all Servlet, Filter and Listener instances registered via the ServletContext are trashed. Finally the ServletContextListener#contextDestroyed() will be invoked and the ServletContext itself will be trashed.
HttpServletRequest and HttpServletResponse
The servlet container is attached to a web server that listens for HTTP requests on a certain port number (port 8080 is usually used during development and port 80 in production). When a client (e.g. user with a web browser, or programmatically using URLConnection) sends an HTTP request, the servlet container creates new HttpServletRequest and HttpServletResponse objects and passes them through any defined Filter in the chain and, eventually, the Servlet instance.
In the case of filters, the doFilter() method is invoked. When the servlet container's code calls chain.doFilter(request, response), the request and response continue on to the next filter, or hit the servlet if there are no remaining filters.
In the case of servlets, the service() method is invoked. By default, this method determines which one of the doXxx() methods to invoke based off of request.getMethod(). If the determined method is absent from the servlet, then an HTTP 405 error is returned in the response.
The request object provides access to all of the information about the HTTP request, such as its URL, headers, query string and body. The response object provides the ability to control and send the HTTP response the way you want by, for instance, allowing you to set the headers and the body (usually with generated HTML content from a JSP file). When the HTTP response is committed and finished, both the request and response objects are recycled and made available for reuse.
HttpSession
When a client visits the webapp for the first time and/or the HttpSession is obtained for the first time via request.getSession(), the servlet container creates a new HttpSession object, generates a long and unique ID (which you can get by session.getId()), and stores it in the server's memory. The servlet container also sets a Cookie in the Set-Cookie header of the HTTP response with JSESSIONID as its name and the unique session ID as its value.
As per the HTTP cookie specification (a contract any decent web browser and web server must adhere to), the client (the web browser) is required to send this cookie back in subsequent requests in the Cookie header for as long as the cookie is valid (i.e. the unique ID must refer to an unexpired session and the domain and path are correct). Using your browser's built-in HTTP traffic monitor, you can verify that the cookie is valid (press F12 in Chrome / Firefox 23+ / IE9+, and check the Net/Network tab). The servlet container will check the Cookie header of every incoming HTTP request for the presence of the cookie with the name JSESSIONID and use its value (the session ID) to get the associated HttpSession from server's memory.
The HttpSession stays alive until it has been idle (i.e. not used in a request) for more than the timeout value specified in <session-timeout>, a setting in web.xml. The timeout value defaults to 30 minutes. So, when the client doesn't visit the web app for longer than the time specified, the servlet container trashes the session. Every subsequent request, even with the cookie specified, will not have access to the same session anymore; the servlet container will create a new session.
On the client side, the session cookie stays alive for as long as the browser instance is running. So, if the client closes the browser instance (all tabs/windows), then the session is trashed on the client's side. In a new browser instance, the cookie associated with the session wouldn't exist, so it would no longer be sent. This causes an entirely new HttpSession to be created, with an entirely new session cookie being used.
In a nutshell
The ServletContext lives for as long as the web app lives. It is shared among all requests in all sessions.
The HttpSession lives for as long as the client is interacting with the web app with the same browser instance, and the session hasn't timed out at the server side. It is shared among all requests in the same session.
The HttpServletRequest and HttpServletResponse live from the time the servlet receives an HTTP request from the client, until the complete response (the web page) has arrived. It is not shared elsewhere.
All Servlet, Filter and Listener instances live as long as the web app lives. They are shared among all requests in all sessions.
Any attribute that is defined in ServletContext, HttpServletRequest and HttpSession will live as long as the object in question lives. The object itself represents the "scope" in bean management frameworks such as JSF, CDI, Spring, etc. Those frameworks store their scoped beans as an attribute of its closest matching scope.
Thread Safety
That said, your major concern is possibly thread safety. You should now know that servlets and filters are shared among all requests. That's the nice thing about Java, it's multithreaded and different threads (read: HTTP requests) can make use of the same instance. It would otherwise be too expensive to recreate, init() and destroy() them for every single request.
You should also realize that you should never assign any request or session scoped data as an instance variable of a servlet or filter. It will be shared among all other requests in other sessions. That's not thread-safe! The below example illustrates this:
public class ExampleServlet extends HttpServlet {
private Object thisIsNOTThreadSafe;
protected void doGet(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response) throws ServletException, IOException {
Object thisIsThreadSafe;
thisIsNOTThreadSafe = request.getParameter("foo"); // BAD!! Shared among all requests!
thisIsThreadSafe = request.getParameter("foo"); // OK, this is thread safe.
}
}
See also:
What is the difference between JSF, Servlet and JSP?
Best option for Session management in Java
Difference between / and /* in servlet mapping url pattern
doGet and doPost in Servlets
Servlet seems to handle multiple concurrent browser requests synchronously
Why Servlets are not thread Safe?

Sessions
In short: the web server issues a unique identifier to each visitor on his first visit. The visitor must bring back that ID for him to be recognised next time around. This identifier also allows the server to properly segregate objects owned by one session against that of another.
Servlet Instantiation
If load-on-startup is false:
If load-on-startup is true:
Once he's on the service mode and on the groove, the same servlet will work on the requests from all other clients.
Why isn't it a good idea to have one instance per client? Think about this: Will you hire one pizza guy for every order that came? Do that and you'd be out of business in no time.
It comes with a small risk though. Remember: this single guy holds all the order information in his pocket: so if you're not cautious about thread safety on servlets, he may end up giving the wrong order to a certain client.

Session in Java servlets is the same as session in other languages such as PHP. It is unique to the user. The server can keep track of it in different ways such as cookies, url rewriting etc. This Java doc article explains it in the context of Java servlets and indicates that exactly how session is maintained is an implementation detail left to the designers of the server. The specification only stipulates that it must be maintained as unique to a user across multiple connections to the server. Check out this article from Oracle for more information about both of your questions.
Edit There is an excellent tutorial here on how to work with session inside of servlets. And here is a chapter from Sun about Java Servlets, what they are and how to use them. Between those two articles, you should be able to answer all of your questions.

When the servlet container (like Apache Tomcat) starts up, it will read from the web.xml file (only one per application) if anything goes wrong or shows up an error at container side console, otherwise, it will deploy and load all web applications by using web.xml (so named it as deployment descriptor).
During instantiation phase of the servlet, servlet instance is ready but it cannot serve the client request because it is missing with two pieces of information:
1: context information
2: initial configuration information
Servlet engine creates servletConfig interface object encapsulating the above missing information into it
servlet engine calls init() of the servlet by supplying servletConfig object references as an argument. Once init() is completely executed servlet is ready to serve the client request.
Q) In the lifetime of servlet how many times instantiation and initialization happens ??
A)only once (for every client request a new thread is created)
only one instance of the servlet serves any number of the client request ie, after serving one client request server does not die. It waits for other client requests ie what CGI (for every client request a new process is created) limitation is overcome with the servlet (internally servlet engine creates the thread).
Q)How session concept works?
A)whenever getSession() is called on HttpServletRequest object
Step 1: request object is evaluated for incoming session ID.
Step 2: if ID not available a brand new HttpSession object is created and its corresponding session ID is generated (ie of HashTable) session ID is stored into httpservlet response object and the reference of HttpSession object is returned to the servlet (doGet/doPost).
Step 3: if ID available brand new session object is not created session ID is picked up from the request object search is made in the collection of sessions by using session ID as the key.
Once the search is successful session ID is stored into HttpServletResponse and the existing session object references are returned to the doGet() or doPost() of UserDefineservlet.
Note:
1)when control leaves from servlet code to client don't forget that session object is being held by servlet container ie, the servlet engine
2)multithreading is left to servlet developers people for implementing ie., handle the multiple requests of client nothing to bother about multithread code
Inshort form:
A servlet is created when the application starts (it is deployed on the servlet container) or when it is first accessed (depending on the load-on-startup setting)
when the servlet is instantiated, the init() method of the servlet is called
then the servlet (its one and only instance) handles all requests (its service() method being called by multiple threads). That's why it is not advisable to have any synchronization in it, and you should avoid instance variables of the servlet
when the application is undeployed (the servlet container stops), the destroy() method is called.

Sessions - what Chris Thompson said.
Instantiation - a servlet is instantiated when the container receives the first request mapped to the servlet (unless the servlet is configured to load on startup with the <load-on-startup> element in web.xml). The same instance is used to serve subsequent requests.

The Servlet Specification JSR-315 clearly defines the web container behavior in the service (and doGet, doPost, doPut etc.) methods (2.3.3.1 Multithreading Issues, Page 9):
A servlet container may send concurrent requests through the service
method of the servlet. To handle the requests, the Servlet Developer
must make adequate provisions for concurrent processing with multiple
threads in the service method.
Although it is not recommended, an alternative for the Developer is to
implement the SingleThreadModel interface which requires the container
to guarantee that there is only one request thread at a time in the
service method. A servlet container may satisfy this requirement by
serializing requests on a servlet, or by maintaining a pool of servlet
instances. If the servlet is part of a Web application that has been
marked as distributable, the container may maintain a pool of servlet
instances in each JVM that the application is distributed across.
For servlets not implementing the SingleThreadModel interface, if the
service method (or methods such as doGet or doPost which are
dispatched to the service method of the HttpServlet abstract class)
has been defined with the synchronized keyword, the servlet container
cannot use the instance pool approach, but must serialize requests
through it. It is strongly recommended that Developers not synchronize
the service method (or methods dispatched to it) in these
circumstances because of detrimental effects on performance

No. Servlets are not Thread safe
This is allows accessing more than one threads at a time
if u want to make it Servlet as Thread safe ., U can go for
Implement SingleThreadInterface(i)
which is a blank Interface there is no
methods
or we can go for synchronize methods
we can make whole service method as synchronized by using synchronized
keyword in front of method
Example::
public Synchronized class service(ServletRequest request,ServletResponse response)throws ServletException,IOException
or we can the put block of the code in the Synchronized block
Example::
Synchronized(Object)
{
----Instructions-----
}
I feel that Synchronized block is better than making the whole method
Synchronized

As is clear from above explanations, by implementing the SingleThreadModel, a servlet can be assured thread-safety by the servlet container. The container implementation can do this in 2 ways:
1) Serializing requests (queuing) to a single instance - this is similar to a servlet NOT implementing SingleThreadModel BUT synchronizing the service/ doXXX methods; OR
2) Creating a pool of instances - which's a better option and a trade-off between the boot-up/initialization effort/time of the servlet as against the restrictive parameters (memory/ CPU time) of the environment hosting the servlet.

Can Servlets have multi-step interactions?

Is there any way to start executing java Servlet code (specifically, in Websphere Application Server) (one session, one thread on the Servlet) and then pause to get more information from the calling client at various points? I require that the current session, and ongoing Servlet thread, not die until specified, and instead keep waiting (open) for information from the client.
Is this kind of ongoing conversation possible? Or can the Servlet call to "doPost" only be started - and then the Servlet ignores the client until it finishes?

As suggested, I would use an object stored in session to maintain the state needed. You can also modify the session on a servlet by servlet basis if you need certain actions to extend the session timeout beyond the webapp defaults using the following method in the HttpSession API:
public void setMaxInactiveInterval(int interval) Specifies the time, in seconds, between client requests before the servlet container will invalidate this session. A negative time indicates the session should never timeout.
You just need to establish your logic for your object setting/retrieval from session. Typically something like this:
HttpSession session = req.getSession();
MyBeanClass bean;
Object temp = null;
temp = session.getAttribute("myBean");
if(temp !=null) {
bean = (MyBeanClass) temp;
} else {
bean = new MyBeanClass();
}
// Logic
session.setAttribute("myBean", bean);

You can save/update your session state between requests and when the next request comes, you can restore and continue whatever you were doing.

I have not done this with directly, but the underlying support is somewhat related to Jetty's continuation model and Servlet 3.0 Suspend/Resume support.
Web frameworks that work like the post description (actually, they are resumed across different connections) are sometimes called Continuation-Based frameworks. I am unsure of any such frameworks in Java (as the Java language is not conducive to such models) but there are two rather well known examples of the general principle:
Seaside (for Smalltalk) and;
Lift (for Scala).
Hope this was somewhat useful.

How can I get HttpServletRequest when in an HttpSessionListener?

How can I access request headers from a SessionListener?
I need to set a timeout on the current session when it is created. The timeout needs to vary based on a header in the HttpServletRequest. I already have a SessionListener (implements HttpSessionListener) that logs the creation and destruction of new sessions, and it seems to be the most logical place to set the timeout.
I've tried the following, but it always sets ctx to null.
FacesContext ctx = FacesContext.getCurrentInstance();

The HttpSessionListener does not have access to the request because it is invoked when no request has been made—to notify of session destruction.
So, a Filter or Servlet would be better places to examine the request and specify the session timeout.

FacesContext ctx = FacesContext.getCurrentInstance();
JSF contexts are per-request and thread-local. So, this method call will probably return null outside the JSF controller invocations (e.g. FacesServlet.service) - so, other threads and any requests that don't pass through the Faces servlet mapping.
It is technically possible to set this time-out using a JSF mechanism - you could use a phase listener to check for a session after RENDER RESPONSE, though you would still have to cast to the servlet API to set the time-out. The advantage of phase listeners is that they can be registered either globally in faces-config (see spec) or for specific views. A global phase listener defined in a JAR with a META-INF/faces-config.xml can be dropped into multiple WARs, allowing you to easily reuse the functionality.
(You could also override how the session is provisioned to JSF, but the amount of work is excessive.)
For a one-off, erickson's suggestion of a Filter is really straightforward.

You can't ( see the API ). The request allows you to access the session, but not the other way around.
You might even have concurrent requests for the same session, so this is not feasible.

How can I share a variable or object between two or more Servlets?

I would like to know if there is some way to share a variable or an object between two or more Servlets, I mean some "standard" way. I suppose that this is not a good practice but is a easier way to build a prototype.
I don't know if it depends on the technologies used, but I'll use Tomcat 5.5
I want to share a Vector of objects of a simple class (just public attributes, strings, ints, etc). My intention is to have a static data like in a DB, obviously it will be lost when the Tomcat is stopped. (it's just for Testing)

I think what you're looking for here is request, session or application data.
In a servlet you can add an object as an attribute to the request object, session object or servlet context object:
protected void doGet(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response) {
String shared = "shared";
request.setAttribute("sharedId", shared); // add to request
request.getSession().setAttribute("sharedId", shared); // add to session
this.getServletConfig().getServletContext().setAttribute("sharedId", shared); // add to application context
request.getRequestDispatcher("/URLofOtherServlet").forward(request, response);
}
If you put it in the request object it will be available to the servlet that is forwarded to until the request is finished:
request.getAttribute("sharedId");
If you put it in the session it will be available to all the servlets going forward but the value will be tied to the user:
request.getSession().getAttribute("sharedId");
Until the session expires based on inactivity from the user.
Is reset by you:
request.getSession().invalidate();
Or one servlet removes it from scope:
request.getSession().removeAttribute("sharedId");
If you put it in the servlet context it will be available while the application is running:
this.getServletConfig().getServletContext().getAttribute("sharedId");
Until you remove it:
this.getServletConfig().getServletContext().removeAttribute("sharedId");

Put it in one of the 3 different scopes.
request - lasts life of request
session - lasts life of user's session
application - lasts until applciation is shut down
You can access all of these scopes via the HttpServletRequest variable that is passed in to the methods that extend from the HttpServlet class

Depends on the scope of the intended use of the data.
If the data is only used on a per-user basis, like user login info, page hit count, etc. use the session object
(httpServletRequest.getSession().get/setAttribute(String [,Object]))
If it is the same data across multiple users (total web page hits, worker threads, etc) use the ServletContext attributes. servlet.getServletCongfig().getServletContext().get/setAttribute(String [,Object])). This will only work within the same war file/web applicaiton. Note that this data is not persisted across restarts either.

Another option, share data betwheen contexts...
share-data-between-servlets-on-tomcat
<Context path="/myApp1" docBase="myApp1" crossContext="true"/>
<Context path="/myApp2" docBase="myApp2" crossContext="true"/>
On myApp1:
ServletContext sc = getServletContext();
sc.setAttribute("attribute", "value");
On myApp2:
ServletContext sc = getServletContext("/myApp1");
String anwser = (String)sc.getAttribute("attribute");

Couldn't you just put the object in the HttpSession and then refer to it by its attribute name in each of the servlets?
e.g:
getSession().setAttribute("thing", object);
...then in another servlet:
Object obj = getSession.getAttribute("thing");

Here's how I do this with Jetty.
https://stackoverflow.com/a/46968645/1287091
Uses the server context, where a singleton is written to during startup of an embedded Jetty server and shared among all webapps for the life of the server. Can also be used to share objects/data between webapps assuming there is only one writer to the context - otherwise you need to be mindful of concurrency.