Develop Reference

How to Insert ArrayList data to the DataBase

Im try to insert data into Database using ArrayList.there is a Erro msg.
That is my Custmer.class method. this is what i got from when i going to pass ArrayList into another class.
incompatible types: ArrayList<String> cannot be converted to ArrayList<Inquiries>
I want to know how to do this using correct Using OOP concept
public void passingMsg(ArrayList<Inquiries> arrlist){
try {
System.out.println("Method "+arrlist);
String sq = "INSERT INTO Inquiries (name,mail,tp,msg)VALUES(?,?,?)";
PreparedStatement pr = con.prepareStatement(sq);
for(int i=0;i<arrlist.size();i++){
pr.setString(1,arrlist.get(i).getName());
pr.setString(2,arrlist.get(i).getMail());
pr.setString(3,arrlist.get(i).getTp());
pr.setString(4,arrlist.get(i).getMsg());
}
pr.executeQuery();//executeBatch();
} catch (SQLException ex) {
}
}
and this is how i get values from user
String name = txtName.getText();
String mail = txtEmail.getText();
String tp = txtTp.getText();
String msg = txtMsg.getText();
ArrayList<String> arrInq = new ArrayList<String>();
arrInq.add(name);
arrInq.add(mail);
arrInq.add(tp);
arrInq.add(msg);
Custmer c =new Custmer();
if( c.passingMsg(arrInq)){
try {
JOptionPane.showMessageDialog(this, "Successs!!");
} catch (Exception e) {
JOptionPane.showMessageDialog(this, "Unsuccesss!!");
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
and this is my Inquiries.class :
public class Inquiries {
private String name;
private String mail;
private String tp;
private String msg;
public Inquiries(String name,String mail,String tp,String msg){
this.name = name;
this.mail = mail;
this.tp = tp;
this.msg = msg;
}
//
public String getName() {
return name;
}
public void setName(String name) {
this.name = name;
}
public String getMail() {
return mail;
}
public void setMail(String mail) {
this.mail = mail;
}
public String getTp() {
return tp;
}
public void setTp(String tp) {
this.tp = tp;
}
public String getMsg() {
return msg;
}
public void setMsg(String msg) {
this.msg = msg;
}
}
Can Some one please explain whats wrong with this. please ?

Reason For Error
This was simply telling you that your types were incompatible for the operation you were trying to perform. In your passingMsg() method, you have its header as: public void passingMsg(ArrayList<Inquiries> arrlist). However, inside your "how i get values from user" area, which I will now refer to as "2nd Snippet", you have your method call declared as: if( c.passingMsg(arrInq)). This means that you are implying that your parameter being passed, arrInq in this case, is of the type ArrayList<Inquiries>, but it's not. It's being initialized in your 2nd Snippet as: ArrayList<String> arrInq = new ArrayList<String>();
Simple Fix
I take no responsibility for this code; use at your own risk. To fix this, you would want to change that entire 2nd Snippet to something similar to the following:
String name = txtName.getText();
String mail = txtEmail.getText();
String tp = txtTp.getText();
String msg = txtMsg.getText();
ArrayList<Inquiries> arrInq = new ArrayList<Inquiries>();
arrInq.add(new Inquiries(name, mail, tp, msg));
Custmer c = new Custmer();
try {
c.passingMsg(arrInq);
JOptionPane.showMessageDialog(this, "Successs!!");
} catch (Exception e) {
JOptionPane.showMessageDialog(this, "Unsuccesss!!");
e.printStackTrace();
}
You would also want to change the method header to either return a boolean, or fix it up a little bit to actually throw the exception. Such as:
public void passingMsg(ArrayList<Inquiries> arrlist) {
System.out.println("Method " + arrlist);
String sq = "INSERT INTO Inquiries(name,mail,tp,msg) VALUES(?,?,?)";
PreparedStatement pr = con.prepareStatement(sq);
for (Inquiries inquiries : arrlist) {
pr.setString(1, inquiries.getName());
pr.setString(2, inquiries.getMail());
pr.setString(3, inquiries.getTp());
pr.setString(4, inquiries.getMsg());
}
pr.executeQuery();//executeBatch();
}

Let's talk in O-O-P way.
Here Inquiries is your model, model is nothing but simple class that has instance members and public methods to get and set value of model's instance variable.
Generally we put all database related operations code in their respective models.
e.g. I have model "Model" which typically maps to database table say it as "TableModel" ,I would do something like this:
public class Model{
private int id;
private String attr;
//other properties of the model
public int getId(){
return id;
}
public void setId(int id){
this.id=id;
}
//other getters and setters
//here we write methods to performs database operations
public void save(){
//use "this" to get properties of object
//logic to save to this object in database table TableModel as record
}
public void delete(int id){
//logic to delete this object i.e. from database table TableModel
}
public Model get(int id){
//retrieve record from table TableModel with this id
}
//other methods to get data from database.
}
Now question is how I can use this in some another class. Let's say I have list of Model objects and I wish to insert them in to database.I will do it something like this:
public class AnotherClass{
public void someMethod(){
//create list of models objects e.g. get them from user interface
ArrayList<Model> models=new ArrayList<>();
for(int i=0;i<3;i++){
Model model=new Model();
model.setId(i);
model.setAttr("attr"+i);
models.add(model);
}
SomeOtherClass obj=new SomeOtherClass();
obj.insert(models);
}
}
public class SomeOtherClass{
//other code above.....
//my method that inserts each Model object in database
//Note: this is sample method , you should do it in optimized way
// e.g. batch insert
public void insert(ArrayList<Model> models){
for(Model myModel:models){
myModel.save();
}
}
//other code below.....
}

You are using the wrong type parameter for the ArrayList. Instead of ArrayList<String> you need ArrayList<Inquiries>. To fix the problem, you should remove this code ...
ArrayList<String> arrInq = new ArrayList<String>();
arrInq.add(name);
arrInq.add(mail);
arrInq.add(tp);
arrInq.add(msg);
... and replace it with this code:
ArrayList<Inquiries> arrInq = new ArrayList<Inquiries>();
arrInq.add(new Inquiries(name, mail, tp, msg));

Using reflection to get a specific attribute from a extended instance

I would like to make a generic method to get a List from the parameter object.
The problem is because I have a declared object with a instance of the other class that extends the declared class.
I don't want to use the instanceof solution because the number of classes that extends LimitedValue can be big.
I thought to use reflection for a solution, but I don't know how to use that with an instance of object, in this part of the code:
Class cls = Class.forName(limitedValue.getClass().getName());
Object obj = cls.newInstance();
//This is wrong, I don't want a new instance.
Method[] methods = cls.getDeclaredMethods();
for(int x= 0; x < methods.length; x++) {
Method method = methods[x];
if ("java.util.List".equals(method.getReturnType().getName())) {
//How to get the value of this method from limitedValue instance ?
}
}
This is my full code:
public class CalculatorLimitedValue {
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
StoreItem storeItem = new StoreItem(1L, "Name of StoreItem", 50L);
List listOfStoreItems = new ArrayList();
listOfStoreItems.add(storeItem);
LimitedValue limitedValue0 = new Store(listOfStoreItems);
List firstList = calculator(limitedValue0);
//do something with the list
SupermarketItem supermarketItem = new SupermarketItem(1L, "Name of SupermarketItem", 21L);
List listOfSupermarketItems = new ArrayList();
listOfSupermarketItems.add(supermarketItem);
LimitedValue limitedValue1 = new Supermarket(listOfSupermarketItems);
List secondList = calculator(limitedValue1);
//do something with the list
}
/** This is the method that I'd like to make generic to return a List */
private static List calculator(LimitedValue limitedValue) throws Exception{
Class cls = Class.forName(limitedValue.getClass().getName());
Object obj = cls.newInstance();
//This is wrong, I don't want a new instance.
Method[] methods = cls.getDeclaredMethods();
for(int x= 0; x < methods.length; x++) {
Method method = methods[x];
if ("java.util.List".equals(method.getReturnType().getName())) {
//How to get the value of this method from limitedValue instance ?
}
}
/* I don't want to use this one way, because my classes that extends LimitedValue
can be big. I would like to made a generic way to get de list of classes. */
if (limitedValue instanceof Store) {
System.out.println("This is a store");
return ((Store) limitedValue).getStoreItems();
} else if (limitedValue instanceof Supermarket) {
System.out.println("This is a supermarket");
return ((Supermarket) limitedValue).getSupermarketItems();
}
return null;
}
}
If it help, these are my other classes:
LimitedValue.class
public class LimitedValue { }
StoreItem.class
public class StoreItem {
private Long id;
private String nameOfStoreItem;
private Long valueOfStoreItem;
public StoreItem(Long id, String nameOfStoreItem, Long valueOfStoreItem){
this.id = id;
this.nameOfStoreItem = nameOfStoreItem;
this.valueOfStoreItem = valueOfStoreItem;
}
//getters and setters...
}
SupermarketItem.class
public class SupermarketItem {
private Long id;
private String nameOfSupermarketItem;
private Long valueOfSupermarketItem;
public SupermarketItem() {
}
public SupermarketItem(Long id, String nameOfSupermarketItem, Long valueOfSupermarketItem) {
this.id = id;
this.nameOfSupermarketItem = nameOfSupermarketItem;
this.valueOfSupermarketItem = valueOfSupermarketItem;
}
//getters and setters...
}
Store.class
public class Store extends LimitedValue {
private List<StoreItem> storeItems;
public Store(List<StoreItem> storeItems) {
this.storeItems = storeItems;
}
//getters and setters
}
Supermarket.class
public class Supermarket extends LimitedValue {
private List<SupermarketItem> supermarketItems;
public Supermarket(List<SupermarketItem> supermarketItems) {
this.supermarketItems = supermarketItems;
}
//getters and setters
}

You could try to use reflection here to try to achieve what you want, but it would be better to reconsider your overall design and try to use a better object oriented design that solves the problem at hand.
In particular, lets say we consider adding a method called getItems to the LimitedValue class that returns a List of items, which may be SupermarketItems or may be StoreItems. If it is structured correctly, you won't need to know the actual type because the code will be abstracted over it polymorphically.
public abstract class LimitedValue {
List<? extends Item> getItems();
}
We've now defined a new method on LimitedValue, but we also have to consider that we've introduced this new Item thing. I note that the SupermarketItem and StoreItem all share similiar attributes, name, id and value, so it seems that it might be possible to use a single class to represent them all.
public abstract class Item {
final Long id;
final String name;
final Long value;
public Item(final Long id, final Long name, final Long value) {
this.id = id;
this.name = name;
this.value = value;
}
String getName() {
return name;
}
// other getters and setters
}
public class SupermarketItem extends Item {
public SupermarketItem(final Long id, final Long name, final Long value) {
super(id, name, value);
}
}
public class StoreItem extends Item {
public StoreItem(final Long id, final Long name, final Long value) {
super(id, name, value);
}
}
Now we've completely abstracted away the need for any reflection when accessing these objects - you can simply call item.getValue() as you will know that every item in the list is of type Item.
Of course, you'll also need to refactor the Store and SuperMarket classes, for example:
public class Supermarket extends LimitedValue {
private List<SupermarketItem> supermarketItems;
public Supermarket(List<SupermarketItem> supermarketItems) {
this.supermarketItems = supermarketItems;
}
public List<? extends Item> getItems() {
return supermarketItems;
}
}
and because you are only returning a List<Item> you always know what is in it, and you can change your main code to work with this.
This is a much cleaner long term solution.

To get the List value, use Method#invoke:
List list = method.invoke(limitedValue);
You don't need Object obj = cls.newInstance(); - you're not using it at all in the method.
In any case, you're making it very difficult for yourself. You could also define an interface
public interface HasList<E> {
List<E> getList();
}
and have all classes implement this.

Creating an incremental number sequence in Java

So I'm creating a student database thing for a school project. My first issue is that upon creating a new student I should see "Application number ### has registered successfully". Now the problem is that we have to have that number generate (### referring to the number) sequentially from 1 every time a new application is recorded. How would I go about doing that?
So far this is what there is but I can't seem to get the number to generate incrementally.
public TestApplication(String Surname, String personalIdNo)
{
if (isValidpersonalIdNo(personalIdNo) == true)
{
Student.add(Surname);
Application.put(personalIdNo, Student);
System.out.println("Application number ### " + "has registered successfully");
}
else
{
System.out.println("Application has failed, Personal id: " + personalIdNo);
}
}
Any help with this would be appreicated.

Since you seem to be using lots of static methods, I believe the best thing for you to do in this case is to create a static field called latestId and a static method called generateId, both in the Student class. Then you can call the generateId method whenever you call Student.add.
However, please note that this solution does not work if your application is multithread.
public class Student {
private static int latestId = 0;
public static int generateId() {
return ++latestId;
}
...
}

You can write a singleton class that will produce the ids for you:
class Generator {
private AtomicInteger count = new AtomicInteger(1);
private static Generator generator = new Generator();
private Generator() { }
public static Generator getInstance() {
return generator;
}
public int generate() {
return count.getAndIncrement();
}
}
Now, when you need to get a new id, you just call the generate method. The AtomicInteger is used because you might need the id from multiple threads and it will make the concurrent access safe.
The singleton Generator provides a single entry point to the id-generating facility.

You can use your storage type to give you the amount of added students that were put into DB.
I don't know what type you use to store your students. If it is hashmap or vector you can use size method to print students count. So I assume if you have Application.put you probably have a field in your Application type that is used to store each student. Then you can add a method like getStudentsCount to it and you should be all set. Since I don't know much about your Application type the above is all assumptions. Below you can find how I would solve that:
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.Vector;
class Student{
private String name;
private int personalID;
public Student(String name, int personalID){
this.name = name;
this.personalID = personalID;
}
public String getName() {
return name;
}
public void setName(String name) {
this.name = name;
}
public int getPersonalID() {
return personalID;
}
public void setPersonalID(int personalID) {
this.personalID = personalID;
}
}
class DB{
private HashMap<Integer, Student> students = new HashMap<Integer, Student>();
public boolean addStudent(Student student) {
Integer studentId = new Integer(student.getPersonalID());
if( !students.containsKey(studentId)){
students.put(new Integer(studentId), student);
return true;
}
else
return false;
}
public int getStudentCount() {
return students.size();
}
}
class Operations{
DB db;
public Operations(DB db){
this.db = db;
}
public boolean addStudent(String name, int personalID){
Student student = new Student(name, personalID);
return db.addStudent( student );
}
}
public class SimpleStudentDB {
public static void main(String [] args){
DB db = new DB();
Operations operations = new Operations(db);
if( operations.addStudent( "Jason", db.getStudentCount()+1) )
System.out.println("Student added successfully. DB contains ###"+db.getStudentCount()+" elements");
else
System.out.println("Operation failed");
}
}

What is the best way to know if all the variables in a Class are null?

This would mean that the class was initialized, but the variables were not set.
A sample Class:
public class User {
String id = null;
String name = null;
public String getId() {
return id;
}
public void setId(String id) {
this.id = id;
}
public String getName() {
return name;
}
public void setName(String name) {
this.name = name;
}
}
The actual class is huge that I prefer not to check if(xyz == null) for each of the variables.

Another non-reflective solution for Java 8, in the line of paxdiabo's answer but without using a series of if's, would be to stream all fields and check for nullness:
return Stream.of(id, name)
.allMatch(Objects::isNull);
This remains quite easy to maintain while avoiding the reflection hammer.

Try something like this:
public boolean checkNull() throws IllegalAccessException {
for (Field f : getClass().getDeclaredFields())
if (f.get(this) != null)
return false;
return true;
}
Although it would probably be better to check each variable if at all feasible.

This can be done fairly easily using a Lombok generated equals and a static EMPTY object:
import lombok.Data;
public class EmptyCheck {
public static void main(String[] args) {
User user1 = new User();
User user2 = new User();
user2.setName("name");
System.out.println(user1.isEmpty()); // prints true
System.out.println(user2.isEmpty()); // prints false
}
#Data
public static class User {
private static final User EMPTY = new User();
private String id;
private String name;
private int age;
public boolean isEmpty() {
return this.equals(EMPTY);
}
}
}
Prerequisites:
Default constructor should not be implemented with custom behavior as that is used to create the EMPTY object
All fields of the class should have an implemented equals (built-in Java types are usually not a problem, in case of custom types you can use Lombok)
Advantages:
No reflection involved
As new fields added to the class, this does not require any maintenance as due to Lombok they will be automatically checked in the equals implementation
Unlike some other answers this works not just for null checks but also for primitive types which have a non-null default value (e.g. if field is int it checks for 0, in case of boolean for false, etc.)

If you want this for unit testing I just use the hasNoNullFieldsOrProperties() method from assertj
assertThat(myObj).hasNoNullFieldsOrProperties();

How about streams?
public boolean checkFieldsIsNull(Object instance, List<String> fieldNames) {
return fieldNames.stream().allMatch(field -> {
try {
return Objects.isNull(instance.getClass().getDeclaredField(field).get(instance));
} catch (IllegalAccessException | NoSuchFieldException e) {
return true;//You can throw RuntimeException if need.
}
});
}

"Best" is such a subjective term :-)
I would just use the method of checking each individual variable. If your class already has a lot of these, the increase in size is not going to be that much if you do something like:
public Boolean anyUnset() {
if ( id == null) return true;
if (name == null) return true;
return false;
}
Provided you keep everything in the same order, code changes (and automated checking with a script if you're paranoid) will be relatively painless.
Alternatively (assuming they're all strings), you could basically put these values into a map of some sort (eg, HashMap) and just keep a list of the key names for that list. That way, you could iterate through the list of keys, checking that the values are set correctly.

I think this is a solution that solves your problem easily: (return true if any of the parameters is not null)
public boolean isUserEmpty(){
boolean isEmpty;
isEmpty = isEmpty = Stream.of(id,
name)
.anyMatch(userParameter -> userParameter != null);
return isEmpty;}
Another solution to the same task is:(you can change it to if(isEmpty==0) checks if all the parameters are null.
public boolean isUserEmpty(){
long isEmpty;
isEmpty = Stream.of(id,
name)
.filter(userParameter -> userParameter != null).count();
return isEmpty > 0
}

The best way in my opinion is Reflection as others have recommended. Here's a sample that evaluates each local field for null. If it finds one that is not null, method will return false.
public class User {
String id = null;
String name = null;
public String getId() {
return id;
}
public void setId(String id) {
this.id = id;
}
public String getName() {
return name;
}
public void setName(String name) {
this.name = name;
}
public boolean isNull() {
Field fields[] = this.getClass().getDeclaredFields();
for (Field f : fields) {
try {
Object value = f.get(this);
if (value != null) {
return false;
}
}
catch (IllegalArgumentException e) {
// TODO Auto-generated catch block
e.printStackTrace();
}
catch (IllegalAccessException e) {
// TODO Auto-generated catch block
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
return true;
}
public static void main(String args[]) {
System.out.println(new User().isNull());
}
}

Field[] field = model.getClass().getDeclaredFields();
for(int j=0 ; j<field.length ; j++){
String name = field[j].getName();
name = name.substring(0,1).toUpperCase()+name.substring(1);
String type = field[j].getGenericType().toString();
if(type.equals("class java.lang.String")){
Method m = model.getClass().getMethod("get"+name);
String value = (String) m.invoke(model);
if(value == null){
... something to do...
}
}

Best for me is
Stream.of(getClass().getDeclaredMethods()).allMatch(Objects::isNull);
It can be used in a custom annotation + annotation processor to automagically define a boolean isNull() method on the annotated classes.

Based on Irkwz's answer, but a different approach:
public class SomeClass{
private String field1;
private String field2;
private ComplexField field3;
private String field4;
private Integer field15;
public boolean isNullAllFields() {
return Stream.of(this.getClass().getDeclaredFields()).anyMatch(element -> (element != null));
}
}
And the end of the day u invoke isNullAllFields method to figure out wheter the object fields are empty.

If you want to do the opposite i.e check if some/all members of class are non-non, the check this answer.
In order to make sure that certain members of the class are always non-null, we can use lombok #NonNull annotation on the individual fields of the class.
import lombok.Data;
import lombok.NonNull;
#Data
public class DataClass {
#NonNull
private String data1;
private int data2;
#NonNull
private String data3;
#NonNull
private String data4;
#NonNull
private String data5;
private String data6;
DataClass(String data1,...) {
// constructor
}
}

Easiest way is to convert the class to a map and get its keys and with stream check if any or all key's values are null or not, you can take input from user as well whether they want to check for specific set of keys only!
Below is the code to check whether any of the key's value has null, you can change stream config to all match or any match as per your requirement
Just replace isNullOrEmpty method i have used with proper null or empty check condition for that particular collection
public boolean checkIfAnyFieldIsNull(Object instance, Set<String> fields){
try {
Map<String, Object> instanceMap = new Gson().fromJson(new GsonBuilder().serializeNulls().create().toJson(instance), Map.class);
if(!isNullorEmpty(instanceMap)) {
fields = isNullorEmpty(fields) ? instanceMap.keySet() : fields;
return fields.stream().anyMatch(curField -> isNull(instanceMap.get(curField)));
}else{
return false;
}
}catch (Exception e){
return false;
}
}
}

Try this method once, its works for me!!
private fun checkIfAnyDataIsNull(model: YourModelCass): Boolean {
return Stream.of<Any>(
model.date,
model.merchantName,
model.payment,
).allMatch(Objects::isNull)
}

You can use the simple solution:
if(user.equals(new User()){
//your processing goes here
}

Questions about enum

If I have a Object
public class Genre {
private int id;
private int name;
}
And the id and name were been determined in advance, for example
if (id == 1)
name = "action";
else if (id == 2)
name = "horror";
My problem is how to create these two methods well
Genre.getName(1); // return "action";
Genre.getId("action"); // return 1;
I thought maybe I can use enum, like
public enum Genre {
ACTION(1), HORROR(2);
private final int id;
private final String name;
private Genre(int id) {
this.id = id;
this.name = getName(id);
}
public int getId() {
return id;
}
public String getName() {
return name;
}
public static String getName(int i) {
switch(i) {
case 1 : return "action";
case 2: return "horror";
default :
return null;
}
}
}
But in this way, I have no idea how to
Genre.getId("action"); // return 1;
And im afraid i use enum not correctly.
Could you give me some advice? Thanks!
---
At first, What I want to do this is in my case i want to use id or name to find the name or id like
int id = 1;
Genre.getName(id); // return "action"
or
String name = "action";
Genre.getId(name); // return 1
And now thanks for all the advices, I realize why I want to do is
int id = 1;
Genre.getGenre(id); // return Genre that id = 1 and the name = "action"
or
String name = "action";
Genre.getGenre(name); // return Genre that id = 1 and the name = "action"

If you insist on using an enum for this, you can just use the existing enum facilities. The solution below assumes the enum name and ordinal may be used in place of your name and id fields:
public enum Genre {
// ordinal 0, name = "ACTION"
ACTION,
// ordinal 1, name = "HORROR"
HORROR;
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
int horrorOrdinal = 1;
Genre horrorGenre = Genre.values()[horrorOrdinal];
String horrorName = horrorGenre.name();
String actionName = "ACTION";
Genre actionGenre = Genre.valueOf(actionName);
int actionOrdinal = actionGenre.ordinal();
System.out.println(String.format("%s=%s %s=%s", horrorName, horrorOrdinal, actionName, actionOrdinal));
}
Output:
HORROR=1 ACTION=0
Another suitable way would be to use a map for the lookup, like Michał Šrajer suggested:
private static Map<Integer, String> genres = new HashMap<Integer, String>();
public static void main(String[] args) {
initGenres();
int horrorOrdinal = 2;
String horrorName = genres.get(horrorOrdinal);
String actionName = "action";
int actionOrdinal = getGenreIdByName(actionName);
System.out.println(String.format("%s=%s %s=%s", horrorName, horrorOrdinal, actionName, actionOrdinal));
}
private static void initGenres() {
genres.put(1, "action");
genres.put(2, "horror");
}
private static int getGenreIdByName(String genreName) {
for (Entry<Integer, String> entry : genres.entrySet()) {
if (entry.getValue().equals(genreName)) {
return entry.getKey();
}
}
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Genre not found: " + genreName);
}
Output:
horror=2 action=1
Design considerations:
In this example I chose to use the (fast) map lookup for id->name and wrote a seperate method (getGenreIdByName) to do the reverse lookup name->id. You could reverse that, or use a second map to make both lookups fast (at the cost of needing to maintain an extra map).
I chose to store the id and name in the map. You could also use the Genre class itself as the map value. This would allow you to easily add extra fields (like 'description') later on.
If you need to represent you genres in different languages, you can use ResourceBundles to localize the output. Create a language file in your classpath root.
In file genres_nl.properties:
horror=heel eng
action=actie
Where the _nl suffix in the filename indicates the language.
Then in your code, in initGenres:
ResourceBundle genreNames = ResourceBundle.getBundle("genres", new Locale("nl");
And when getting the genre name:
String horrorName = genreNames.getString(genres.get(horrorOrdinal));
Note that getString can throw the runtime exception MissingResourceException if the bundle is not found. To avoid this, make sure you create a 'default' bundle with no suffix (so in this case a file named 'genres.properties') which is automatically used in case no bundle for the used Locale can be found.

Try the valueOf(...) method:
void String getId(String name) {
//names are upper case, so account for that
//handling non-existent names is an excersize for you
valueOf(name.toUpperCase()).getId();
}
Note that there are better methods (like Thilo suggested), but if you have a string only, you might use that.
Edit: another note:
In your getName(int i) method, you might want to return ACTION.name() etc. in order to be more refactoring safe and use the correct case.

You can get its ID by calling Genre.ACTION.getId();

This should do it:
Genre.ACTION.getId()
And if you need to do it at run-time:
Genre.valueOf("ACTION").getId()

ACTION(1, "action"), HORROR(2, "horror");
is a easy way to do it.
But if you are require to do it more often i would suggest you to create your own class and use MAP<-"-,-"-> as micheal said.
Edit:----
As you said the rarely gonna change use this way-->
public enum Genre {
ACTION(0, "action"), HORROR(1, "horror"), ROMANCE(2, "romance"), COMEDY(5, "comedy");
public final int id;
public final String name;
private Genre(int id, String name) {
this.id = id;
this.name = name;
};
public final static int length = Genre.values().length;
public static String[] getGenre() {
String[] genreList = new String[length];
int i = 0;
for (Genre attribute : Genre.values()) {
genreList[i++] = attribute.toString();
}
return genreList;
}
#Override
public String toString() {
return this.name;
}
}
Please remember use this as Genre.HORROR.id
also note that using this way is best as per your requirement.

Why don't you use the Enum Constructor with id and String:
public enum Genre {
ACTION(1, "action"), HORROR(2, "horror");
}

public enum Genre {
ACTION(1, "action"), HORROR(2, "horror");
private final int id;
private final String name;
private Genre(int id, String name) {
this.id = id;
this.name = name;
}
public int getId() {
return id;
}
public String getName() {
return name;
}
}

If you need to access particular element by it's name, you need to do it this way:
Genre.valueOf("ACTION").getId()
However, if you need to do it often, and in more dynamic way, I suggest to create regular class, and to keep all data in some Map<String, Movie> container.