I have such code
public class Xml {
public static void main(String[] args) throws JsonProcessingException {
String xmlString = "<password><plainPassword>12345</plainPassword></password>";
XmlMapper xmlMapper = new XmlMapper();
PlainPassword plainPassword = xmlMapper.readValue(xmlString, PlainPassword.class);
System.out.println(plainPassword.getPlainPassword());
}
#JacksonXmlRootElement(localName = "password")
public static class PlainPassword {
public String getPlainPassword() {
return this.plainPassword;
}
public void setPlainPassword(String plainPassword) {
this.plainPassword = plainPassword;
}
private String plainPassword;
}
}
It works fine, but in xmlString I can use any root tag name and my code still will work.
For example String xmlString = "<x><plainPassword>12345</plainPassword></x>"; where I use x as root element also works.
But is it possible to say xmlMapper that it could correctly deserialize only strings with "password" root element?
Unfortunately, the behavior you described is the one supported by Jackson as indicated in this Github open issue.
With JSON content and ObjectMapper you can enable the UNWRAP_ROOT_VALUE deserialization feature, and maybe it could be of help for this purpose, although I am not quite sure if this feature is or not correctly supported by XmlMapper.
One possible solution could be the implementation of a custom deserializer.
Given your PlainPassword class:
#JacksonXmlRootElement(localName = "password")
public class PlainPassword {
public String getPlainPassword() {
return this.plainPassword;
}
public void setPlainPassword(String plainPassword) {
this.plainPassword = plainPassword;
}
private String plainPassword;
}
Consider the following main method:
public static void main(String[] args) throws JsonProcessingException {
String xmlString = "<x><plainPassword>12345</plainPassword></x>";
XmlMapper xmlMapper = new XmlMapper();
xmlMapper.registerModule(new SimpleModule().setDeserializerModifier(new BeanDeserializerModifier() {
#Override
public JsonDeserializer<?> modifyDeserializer(DeserializationConfig config, BeanDescription beanDesc, JsonDeserializer<?> deserializer) {
Class<?> beanClass = beanDesc.getBeanClass();
JacksonXmlRootElement annotation = beanClass.getAnnotation(JacksonXmlRootElement.class);
String requiredLocalName = null;
if (annotation != null) {
requiredLocalName = annotation.localName();
}
if (requiredLocalName != null) {
return new EnforceXmlElementNameDeserializer<>(deserializer, beanDesc.getBeanClass(), requiredLocalName);
}
return deserializer;
}
}));
PlainPassword plainPassword = xmlMapper.readValue(xmlString, PlainPassword.class);
System.out.println(plainPassword.getPlainPassword());
}
Where the custom deserializer looks like:
public class EnforceXmlElementNameDeserializer<T> extends StdDeserializer<T> implements ResolvableDeserializer {
private final JsonDeserializer<?> defaultDeserializer;
private final String requiredLocalName;
public EnforceXmlElementNameDeserializer(JsonDeserializer<?> defaultDeserializer, Class<?> beanClass, String requiredLocalName) {
super(beanClass);
this.defaultDeserializer = defaultDeserializer;
this.requiredLocalName = requiredLocalName;
}
#Override
public T deserialize(JsonParser p, DeserializationContext ctxt)
throws IOException {
String rootName = ((FromXmlParser)p).getStaxReader().getLocalName();
if (!this.requiredLocalName.equals(rootName)) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException(
String.format("Root name '%s' does not match required element name '%s'", rootName, this.requiredLocalName)
);
}
#SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
T itemObj = (T) defaultDeserializer.deserialize(p, ctxt);
return itemObj;
}
#Override public void resolve(DeserializationContext ctxt) throws JsonMappingException {
((ResolvableDeserializer) defaultDeserializer).resolve(ctxt);
}
}
You have to implement ResolvableDeserializer when modifying BeanDeserializer, otherwise deserializing throws exception.
The code is based in this excellent SO answer.
The test should raise IllegalArgumentException with the corresponding message:
Root name 'x' does not match required element name 'password'
Please, modify the exception type as appropriate.
If, instead, you use:
String xmlString = "<password><plainPassword>12345</plainPassword></password>";
in your main method, it should run without problem.
You can change your name of root class to everything, for example : #JacksonXmlRootElement(localName = "xyz") and it works.
Based on Java documentation JacksonXmlRootElement is used to define name of root element used for the root-level object when serialized (not for deserialized mapping), which normally uses name of the type (class).
I'd approach this differently. Grab an XPath implementation, select all nodes that match //plainPassword, then get a list of contents of each node.
If you need to, you can also get the name of the parent node; when in context of a found node use .. to get the parent node.
Check XPath examples and try it out for yourself. Note that your code may differ depending on language and XPath implementation.
Related
I was asked to change our jackson mapping configuration so that each empty object we deserialize (from JSON) is going to be deserialized as null.
The problem is that I'm struggling to do it, but without any luck. Here is a sample of our ObjectMapper configuration (and example):
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
mapper.disable(DeserializationFeature.FAIL_ON_UNKNOWN_PROPERTIES);
mapper.setSerializationInclusion(JsonInclude.Include.NON_NULL);
mapper.configure(SerializationFeature.FAIL_ON_EMPTY_BEANS, true);
mapper.setVisibility(PropertyAccessor.ALL, JsonAutoDetect.Visibility.ANY);
JavaTimeModule javaTimeModule = new JavaTimeModule();
javaTimeModule.addDeserializer(LocalDateTime.class, new LocalDateTimeDeserializer(DateTimeFormatter.ISO_DATE_TIME));
javaTimeModule.addDeserializer(Instant.class, InstantDeserializer.INSTANT);
mapper.registerModule(javaTimeModule);
mapper.configure(SerializationFeature.WRITE_DATES_AS_TIMESTAMPS, false);
mapper.configure(DeserializationFeature.FAIL_ON_UNKNOWN_PROPERTIES, false);
warmupMapper(mapper);
return mapper;
I thought about something like adding:
mapper.configure(
DeserializationFeature.ACCEPT_EMPTY_STRING_AS_NULL_OBJECT, true);
but it just works on strings.
I'm afraid that using a custom deserializer will not help me, because I'm writing a generic (for all objects) mapper. So I probably need something like a delegator or a post process deserialization method.
So for json like "" or {} I expect to be converted to null in java (and not to empty string or Object instance).
What is a empty object for you? A object with null value fields? A object with no fields? You can create a custom to check the nodes and deserialize how you want. I see no problem to use it in a generic way.
I did a little example:
import com.fasterxml.jackson.core.JsonParser;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.core.JsonProcessingException;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.DeserializationContext;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.JsonNode;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.deser.std.StdDeserializer;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.module.SimpleModule;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.util.Objects;
public class DeserializerExample<T> extends StdDeserializer<T> {
private final ObjectMapper defaultMapper;
public DeserializerExample(Class<T> clazz) {
super(clazz);
defaultMapper = new ObjectMapper();
}
#Override
public T deserialize(JsonParser jp, DeserializationContext dc) throws IOException, JsonProcessingException {
System.out.println("Deserializing...");
JsonNode node = jp.getCodec().readTree(jp);
for (JsonNode jsonNode : node) {
if (!jsonNode.isNull()) {
return defaultMapper.treeToValue(node, (Class<T>) getValueClass());
}
}
return null;
}
public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException {
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
SimpleModule module = new SimpleModule();
module.addDeserializer(Person.class, new DeserializerExample(Person.class));
mapper.registerModule(module);
Person person = mapper.readValue("{\"id\":1, \"name\":\"Joseph\"}", Person.class);
Person nullPerson = mapper.readValue("{\"id\":null, \"name\":null}", Person.class);
System.out.println("Is null: " + Objects.isNull(person));
System.out.println("Is null: " + Objects.isNull(nullPerson));
}
}
The only way to do this is to use a custom deserializer:
class CustomDeserializer extends JsonDeserializer<String> {
#Override
public String deserialize(JsonParser jsonParser, DeserializationContext context) throws IOException, JsonProcessingException {
JsonNode node = jsonParser.readValueAsTree();
if (node.asText().isEmpty()) {
return null;
}
return node.toString();
}
}
Then do:
class EventBean {
public Long eventId;
public String title;
#JsonDeserialize(using = CustomDeserializer.class)
public String location;
}
This solution courtesy of Sach141 on this question.
I had the same problem.
I hava a City class and sometimes I recive 'city':{} from a web service request.
So, the standard serializer create a new City with all empty field.
I created a custom deserializer in this way
public class CityJsonDeSerializer extends StdDeserializer<City> {
#Override
public City deserialize(JsonParser jp, DeserializationContext dc) throws IOException, JsonProcessingException {
JsonNode node = jp.getCodec().readTree(jp);
if(node.isNull() || node.asText().isEmpty()|| node.size()==0)
return null;
City city = new City();
... // set all fields
return city;
}
}
The if check the conditions:
'city' : null
'city' : ''
'city' : '{}'
and if it's true, the deserializer returns null.
Another approach is to use a com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.util.Converter<IN,OUT>, which is essentially a postprocessor for deserialization.
Imagine we have a class:
public class Person {
public String id;
public String name;
}
Now imagine we want to deserialize an empty JSON object {} as null, rather than a Person with null values for id and name. We can create the following Converter:
public PersonConverter implements Converter<Person,Person> {
#Override
public Person convert(Person p) {
return isEmpty(p) ? null : value;
}
private static boolean isEmpty(Person p) {
if(p == null) {
return true;
}
if(Optional.ofNullable(p.id).orElse("").isEmpty() &&
Optional.ofNullable(p.name).orElse("").isEmpty()) {
return true;
}
return false;
}
#Override
public JavaType getInputType(TypeFactory typeFactory) {
return typeFactory.constructType(Person.class);
}
#Override
public JavaType getOutputType(TypeFactory typeFactory) {
return typeFactory.constructType(Person.class);
}
}
Note that we have to handle the blank String case because that is (counter-intuitively) the default value assigned to properties not given in JSON, as opposed to null.
Given the converter, we can then annotate our original Person class:
#JsonDeserialize(converter=PersonConverter.class)
public class Person {
public String id;
public String name;
}
The benefit of this approach is that you don't have to think or care about deserialization at all; you're simply deciding what to do with the deserialized object after it's deserialized. And there are many other transformations you can do with a Converter, too. But this works nicely for nullifying "empty" values.
I want to deserialize classes of the form:
public class TestFieldEncryptedMessage implements ITextMessage {
#JsonProperty("text")
#Encrypted(cipherAlias = "testAlias")
private String text;
public TestFieldEncryptedMessage() {
}
#JsonCreator
public TestFieldEncryptedMessage(#JsonProperty("text") String text) {
this.text = text;
}
public String getText() {
return text;
}
public void setText(String text) {
this.text = text;
}
}
Where the text is encrypted and deserialization should unencrypt the value before rebuilding the TestFieldEncryptedMessage instance.
I am following an approach very similar to: https://github.com/codesqueak/jackson-json-crypto
That is, I am building a module extending SimpleModule:
public class CryptoModule extends SimpleModule {
public final static String GROUP_ID = "au.com.auspost.messaging";
public final static String ARTIFACT_ID = "jackson-json-crypto";
private EncryptedSerializerModifier serializerModifier;
private EncryptedDeserializerModifier deserializerModifier;
public CryptoModule() {
}
public CryptoModule addEncryptionService(final EncryptionService encryptionService) {
serializerModifier = new EncryptedSerializerModifier(encryptionService);
deserializerModifier = new EncryptedDeserializerModifier(encryptionService);
return this;
}
#Override
public String getModuleName() {
return ARTIFACT_ID;
}
#Override
public Version version() {
return new Version(major, minor, patch, null, GROUP_ID, ARTIFACT_ID);
}
#Override
public void setupModule(final SetupContext context) {
if ((null == serializerModifier) || (null == deserializerModifier))
throw new EncryptionException("Crypto module not initialised with an encryption service");
context.addBeanSerializerModifier(serializerModifier);
context.addBeanDeserializerModifier(deserializerModifier);
}
}
As you can see, two modifiers are set up: the EncryptedSerializerModifier works perfectly and is called by the ObjectMapper, but the deserializer behind the EncryptedDeserializerModifier is ignored.
As is seen in many other examples on SO such as here: How can I include raw JSON in an object using Jackson?, I set up the EncryptedDeserializerModifier with:
public class EncryptedDeserializerModifier extends BeanDeserializerModifier {
private final EncryptionService encryptionService;
private Map<String, SettableBeanProperty> properties = new HashMap<>();
public EncryptedDeserializerModifier(final EncryptionService encryptionService) {
this.encryptionService = encryptionService;
}
#Override
public BeanDeserializerBuilder updateBuilder(final DeserializationConfig config, final BeanDescription beanDescription, final BeanDeserializerBuilder builder) {
Encrypted annotation = beanDescription.getType().getRawClass().getAnnotation(Encrypted.class);
Iterator it = builder.getProperties();
while (it.hasNext()) {
SettableBeanProperty p = (SettableBeanProperty) it.next();
if (null != p.getAnnotation(Encrypted.class)) {
JsonDeserializer<Object> current = p.getValueDeserializer();
properties.put(p.getName(), p);
builder.addOrReplaceProperty(p.withValueDeserializer(new EncryptedJsonDeserializer(encryptionService, current, p)), true);
}
}
return builder;
}
}
Finally, the EncryptedJsonDeserializer itself overrides the following:
#Override
public Object deserialize(final JsonParser parser, final DeserializationContext context) throws JsonMappingException {
JsonDeserializer<?> deserializer = baseDeserializer;
if (deserializer instanceof ContextualDeserializer) {
deserializer = ((ContextualDeserializer) deserializer).createContextual(context, property);
}
return service.decrypt(parser, deserializer, context, property != null ? property.getType() : type);
}
#Override
public JsonDeserializer<?> createContextual(final DeserializationContext context, final BeanProperty property) throws JsonMappingException {
JsonDeserializer<?> wrapped = context.findRootValueDeserializer(property.getType());
return new EncryptedJsonDeserializer(service, wrapped, property);
}
The createContextual() method is called, but the deserialize method is not called. The property throughout the execution is always the "text" property, so I seem to have the right context.
anyone know why the ObjectMapper doesn't find the right Deserializer?
EDIT added implements ITextMessage to decrypted class, which I thought was an unimportant detail, but turned out to be the cause of the issue.
I found the issue! If you look closely at the TestFieldEncryptedMessage class, whose text field is encrypted, you can see that it implements an interface. The interface is used so that the messages give some extra tooling for asserts in tests, however for deserialization, there is an unintended consequence. When the ObjectMapper is working its way through the json string, it tries, I think, to match a deserializer to a field inside ITextMessage, not to a field inside TestFieldEncryptedMessage, which is why the custom deserializer was not called (there is no text field in ITextMessage).
Once I stopped implementing ITextMessage, the custom deserializer was called.
I have three classes which inherits from a super class (SensorData)
#JsonDeserialize(using = SensorDataDeserializer.class)
public abstract class SensorData {
}
public class HumiditySensorData extends SensorData {
}
public class LuminositySensorData extends SensorData {
}
public class TemperatureSensorData extends SensorData {
}
I want convert a json input into one of this classes depending on a parameter. I'm trying to use Jackson StdDeserializer and I create a custom deserializer
#Component
public class SensorDataDeserializer extends StdDeserializer<SensorData> {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 3625068688939160875L;
#Autowired
private SensorManager sensorManager;
private static final String discriminator = "name";
public SensorDataDeserializer() {
super(SensorData.class);
SpringBeanProvider.getInstance().autowireBean(this);
}
#Override
public SensorData deserialize(JsonParser parser,
DeserializationContext context) throws IOException,
JsonProcessingException {
ObjectMapper mapper = (ObjectMapper) parser.getCodec();
ObjectNode root = (ObjectNode) mapper.readTree(parser);
ObjectNode sensor = (ObjectNode) root.get("data");
String type = root.get(discriminator).asText();
Class<? extends SensorData> clazz = this.sensorManager
.getCachedSensorsMap().get(type).sensorDataClass();
if (clazz == null) {
// TODO should throw exception
return null;
}
return mapper.readValue(sensor.traverse(), clazz);
}
}
My problem is that when I determine the correct type to mapping the concrete class, the mapper call again to the custom StdDeserializer. So I need a way
to broke the cycle when I have the correct type. The stacktrace is the next one
java.lang.NullPointerException
at com.hp.psiot.mapping.SensorDataDeserializer.deserialize(SensorDataDeserializer.java:38)
at com.hp.psiot.mapping.SensorDataDeserializer.deserialize(SensorDataDeserializer.java:1)
at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper._readValue(ObjectMapper.java:3532)
at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper.readValue(ObjectMapper.java:1868)
at com.hp.psiot.mapping.SensorDataDeserializer.deserialize(SensorDataDeserializer.java:47)
at com.hp.psiot.mapping.SensorDataDeserializer.deserialize(SensorDataDeserializer.java:1)
at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper._readMapAndClose(ObjectMapper.java:3560)
at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper.readValue(ObjectMapper.java:2660)
at org.springframework.http.converter.json.AbstractJackson2HttpMessageConverter.readJavaType(AbstractJackson2HttpMessageConverter.java:205)
at org.springframework.http.converter.json.AbstractJackson2HttpMessageConverter.read(AbstractJackson2HttpMessageConverter.java:200)
at org.springframework.web.servlet.mvc.method.annotation.AbstractMessageConverterMethodArgumentResolver.readWithMessageConverters (AbstractMessageConverterMethodArgumentResolver.java:138)
at org.springframework.web.servlet.mvc.method.annotation.RequestResponseBodyMethodProcessor.readWithMessageConverters(RequestResponseBodyMethodProcessor.java:184)
at org.springframework.web.servlet.mvc.method.annotation.RequestResponseBodyMethodProcessor.resolveArgument(RequestResponseBodyMethodProcessor.java:105)
An example of input
{
"name":"temperature",
"data": {
"value":20
}
}
I only include the stacktrace to show that the mapper is calling again to the deserializer. The reason for the nullPointerException is that when the second the ObjectMapper is called the input is
"value":20
So, An exception is threw because we don't have the information to determine the type and it doesn't check if the input is correct
I want to avoid using JsonSubTypes and JsonTypeInfo if it's posible.
Thanks in advance!
Partial solution
In my case the SensorData is wrapped in other class (ServiceData)
class ServiceData {
#JsonDeserialize(using = SensorDataDeserializer.class)
List<SensorData> sensors;
}
So, I get rid of JsonDeserializer in SensorData class and put it in the field avoiding the cycle. The solution isn't the best, but in my case it helps me. But in the case that the class isn't wrapped in another one we still have the same problem.
Note that if you have a Collection and you annotate with JsonDeserialize that field you have to handle all the collection. Here is the modification
in my case
#Component
public class SensorDataDeserializer extends StdDeserializer<List<SensorData>> {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 3625068688939160875L;
#Autowired
private SensorManager sensorManager;
private static final String discriminator = "name";
public SensorDataDeserializer() {
super(SensorData.class);
SpringBeanProvider.getInstance().autowireBean(this);
}
#Override
public List<SensorData> deserialize(JsonParser parser,
DeserializationContext context) throws IOException,
JsonProcessingException {
try {
ObjectMapper mapper = (ObjectMapper) parser.getCodec();
ArrayNode root = (ArrayNode) mapper.readTree(parser);
int size = root.size();
List<SensorData> sensors = new ArrayList<SensorData>();
for (int i = 0; i < size; ++i) {
ObjectNode sensorHead = (ObjectNode) root.get(i);
ObjectNode sensorData = (ObjectNode) sensorHead.get("data");
String tag = sensorHead.get(discriminator).asText();
Class<? extends SensorData> clazz = this.sensorManager
.getCachedSensorsMap().get(tag).sensorDataClass();
if (clazz == null) {
throw new InvalidJson("unbound sensor");
}
SensorData parsed = mapper.readValue(sensorData.traverse(),
clazz);
if (parsed == null) {
throw new InvalidJson("unbound sensor");
}
sensors.add(parsed);
}
return sensors;
} catch (Throwable e) {
throw new InvalidJson("invalid data");
}
}
}
Hope it helps someone :)
Why don't you just use #JsonTypeInfo? Polymorphic handling is the specific use case for it.
In this case, you would want to use something like:
#JsonTypeInfo(use=Id.NAME, include=As.PROPERTY, property="name")
#JsonSubTypes({ HumiditySensorData.class, ... }) // or register via mapper
public abstract class SensorData { ... }
#JsonTypeName("temperature")
public class TemperaratureSensorData extends SensorData {
public TemperaratureSensorData(#JsonProperty("data") JsonNode data) {
// extract pieces out
}
}
which would handle resolution from 'name' into sub-type, bind contents of 'data' as JsonNode (or, if you prefer can use Map or Object or whatever type matches).
Let's imagine I have the following POJO:
class Pojo {
String s;
Object o;
Map<String, String> m;
}
And at runtime, I want default serialization / deserialization for all properties except one. Typically, I want to replace a field by its ID in a database when serializing, similarly to this other question.
For example, I want to replace o by a string obtained from an external mapping (for example: object1 <=> "123" and object2 <=> "456"):
serialization: read o and replace (so if o is object1, serialize as string "123")
deserialization: read "123", query some table to get the original value of o back (i.e. object1), recreate a Pojo object with o = object1.
I understand that Modules would be one way to do that but I'm not sure how to use them while keeping the automatic BeanSerializer/Deserializer for the properties that don't need to be changed.
Can someone give an example (even contrived) or an alternative approach?
Notes:
I can't use annotations or Mixins as the changes are unknown at compile time (i.e. any properties might be changed in a way that is not determinable).
This other question points to using a CustomSerializerFactory, which seems to do the job. Unfortunately, the official site indicates that it is not the recommended approach any more and that modules should be used instead.
Edit
To be a little clearer, I can do the following with Mixins for example:
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper(MongoBsonFactory.createFactory());
mapper.addMixInAnnotations(Pojo.class, PojoMixIn.class);
ObjectReader reader = mapper.reader(Pojo.class);
DBEncoder dbEncoder = DefaultDBEncoder.FACTORY.create();
OutputBuffer buffer = new BasicOutputBuffer();
dbEncoder.writeObject(buffer, o);
with the following Mixin:
abstract class PojoMixIn {
#JsonIgnore Object o;
}
And then add the required string to the JSON content. But I would need to know at compile time that it is the o field that needs to be replaced, which I don't.
I think #JsonSerialize and #JsonDeserialize is what you need. These annotations give you control on the serialization/deserialization of particular fields. This question shows elegant way to combine them into one annotation.
UPD. For this complex scenario you could take a look at BeanSerializerModifier/BeanDeserializerModifier classes. The idea is to modify general BeanSerializer/BeanDeserializer with your custom logic for particular fields and let basic implementation to do other stuff. Will post an example some time later.
UPD2. As I see, one of the way could be to use changeProperties method and assign your own serializer.
UPD3. Updated with working example of custom serializer. Deserialization could be done in similar way.
UPD4. Updated example with full custom serialization/deserialization. (I have used jakson-mapper-asl-1.9.8)
public class TestBeanSerializationModifiers {
static final String PropertyName = "customProperty";
static final String CustomValue = "customValue";
static final String BaseValue = "baseValue";
// Custom serialization
static class CustomSerializer extends JsonSerializer<Object> {
#Override
public void serialize(Object value, JsonGenerator jgen, SerializerProvider provider) throws IOException, JsonProcessingException {
String customValue = CustomValue; // someService.getCustomValue(value);
jgen.writeString(customValue);
}
}
static class MyBeanSerializerModifier extends BeanSerializerModifier {
#Override
public List<BeanPropertyWriter> changeProperties(SerializationConfig config, BasicBeanDescription beanDesc, List<BeanPropertyWriter> beanProperties) {
for (int i = 0; i < beanProperties.size(); i++) {
BeanPropertyWriter beanPropertyWriter = beanProperties.get(i);
if (PropertyName.equals(beanPropertyWriter.getName())) {
beanProperties.set(i, beanPropertyWriter.withSerializer(new CustomSerializer()));
}
}
return beanProperties;
}
}
// Custom deserialization
static class CustomDeserializer extends JsonDeserializer<Object> {
#Override
public Object deserialize(JsonParser jp, DeserializationContext ctxt) throws IOException, JsonProcessingException {
// serialized value, 'customValue'
String serializedValue = jp.getText();
String baseValue = BaseValue; // someService.restoreOldValue(serializedValue);
return baseValue;
}
}
static class MyBeanDeserializerModifier extends BeanDeserializerModifier {
#Override
public BeanDeserializerBuilder updateBuilder(DeserializationConfig config, BasicBeanDescription beanDesc, BeanDeserializerBuilder builder) {
Iterator<SettableBeanProperty> beanPropertyIterator = builder.getProperties();
while (beanPropertyIterator.hasNext()) {
SettableBeanProperty settableBeanProperty = beanPropertyIterator.next();
if (PropertyName.equals(settableBeanProperty.getName())) {
SettableBeanProperty newSettableBeanProperty = settableBeanProperty.withValueDeserializer(new CustomDeserializer());
builder.addOrReplaceProperty(newSettableBeanProperty, true);
break;
}
}
return builder;
}
}
static class Model {
private String customProperty = BaseValue;
private String[] someArray = new String[]{"one", "two"};
public String getCustomProperty() {
return customProperty;
}
public void setCustomProperty(String customProperty) {
this.customProperty = customProperty;
}
public String[] getSomeArray() {
return someArray;
}
public void setSomeArray(String[] someArray) {
this.someArray = someArray;
}
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
SerializerFactory serializerFactory = BeanSerializerFactory
.instance
.withSerializerModifier(new MyBeanSerializerModifier());
DeserializerFactory deserializerFactory = BeanDeserializerFactory
.instance
.withDeserializerModifier(new MyBeanDeserializerModifier());
ObjectMapper objectMapper = new ObjectMapper();
objectMapper.setSerializerFactory(serializerFactory);
objectMapper.setDeserializerProvider(new StdDeserializerProvider(deserializerFactory));
try {
final String fileName = "test-serialization.json";
// Store, "customValue" -> json
objectMapper.writeValue(new File(fileName), new Model());
// Restore, "baseValue" -> model
Model model = objectMapper.readValue(new File(fileName), Model.class);
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
I am trying to include raw JSON inside a Java object when the object is (de)serialized using Jackson. In order to test this functionality, I wrote the following test:
public static class Pojo {
public String foo;
#JsonRawValue
public String bar;
}
#Test
public void test() throws JsonGenerationException, JsonMappingException, IOException {
String foo = "one";
String bar = "{\"A\":false}";
Pojo pojo = new Pojo();
pojo.foo = foo;
pojo.bar = bar;
String json = "{\"foo\":\"" + foo + "\",\"bar\":" + bar + "}";
ObjectMapper objectMapper = new ObjectMapper();
String output = objectMapper.writeValueAsString(pojo);
System.out.println(output);
assertEquals(json, output);
Pojo deserialized = objectMapper.readValue(output, Pojo.class);
assertEquals(foo, deserialized.foo);
assertEquals(bar, deserialized.bar);
}
The code outputs the following line:
{"foo":"one","bar":{"A":false}}
The JSON is exactly how I want things to look. Unfortunately, the code fails with an exception when attempting to read the JSON back in to the object. Here is the exception:
org.codehaus.jackson.map.JsonMappingException: Can not deserialize instance of java.lang.String out of START_OBJECT token
at [Source: java.io.StringReader#d70d7a; line: 1, column: 13] (through reference chain: com.tnal.prism.cobalt.gather.testing.Pojo["bar"])
Why does Jackson function just fine in one direction but fail when going the other direction? It seems like it should be able to take its own output as input again. I know what I'm trying to do is unorthodox (the general advice is to create an inner object for bar that has a property named A), but I don't want to interact with this JSON at all. My code is acting as a pass-through for this code -- I want to take in this JSON and send it back out again without touching a thing, because when the JSON changes I don't want my code to need modifications.
Thanks for the advice.
EDIT: Made Pojo a static class, which was causing a different error.
#JsonRawValue is intended for serialization-side only, since the reverse direction is a bit trickier to handle. In effect it was added to allow injecting pre-encoded content.
I guess it would be possible to add support for reverse, although that would be quite awkward: content will have to be parsed, and then re-written back to "raw" form, which may or may not be the same (since character quoting may differ).
This for general case. But perhaps it would make sense for some subset of problems.
But I think a work-around for your specific case would be to specify type as 'java.lang.Object', since this should work ok: for serialization, String will be output as is, and for deserialization, it will be deserialized as a Map. Actually you might want to have separate getter/setter if so; getter would return String for serialization (and needs #JsonRawValue); and setter would take either Map or Object. You could re-encode it to a String if that makes sense.
Following #StaxMan answer, I've made the following works like a charm:
public class Pojo {
Object json;
#JsonRawValue
public String getJson() {
// default raw value: null or "[]"
return json == null ? null : json.toString();
}
public void setJson(JsonNode node) {
this.json = node;
}
}
And, to be faithful to the initial question, here is the working test:
public class PojoTest {
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
#Test
public void test() throws IOException {
Pojo pojo = new Pojo("{\"foo\":18}");
String output = mapper.writeValueAsString(pojo);
assertThat(output).isEqualTo("{\"json\":{\"foo\":18}}");
Pojo deserialized = mapper.readValue(output, Pojo.class);
assertThat(deserialized.json.toString()).isEqualTo("{\"foo\":18}");
// deserialized.json == {"foo":18}
}
}
I was able to do this with a custom deserializer (cut and pasted from here)
package etc;
import java.io.IOException;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.core.JsonParser;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.core.JsonProcessingException;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.core.TreeNode;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.DeserializationContext;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.JsonDeserializer;
/**
* Keeps json value as json, does not try to deserialize it
* #author roytruelove
*
*/
public class KeepAsJsonDeserializer extends JsonDeserializer<String> {
#Override
public String deserialize(JsonParser jp, DeserializationContext ctxt)
throws IOException {
TreeNode tree = jp.getCodec().readTree(jp);
return tree.toString();
}
}
Use it by annotating the desired member like this:
#JsonDeserialize(using = KeepAsJsonDeserializer.class)
private String value;
#JsonSetter may help. See my sample ('data' is supposed to contain unparsed JSON):
class Purchase
{
String data;
#JsonProperty("signature")
String signature;
#JsonSetter("data")
void setData(JsonNode data)
{
this.data = data.toString();
}
}
This is a problem with your inner classes. The Pojo class is a non-static inner class of your test class, and Jackson cannot instantiate that class. So it can serialize, but not deserialize.
Redefine your class like this:
public static class Pojo {
public String foo;
#JsonRawValue
public String bar;
}
Note the addition of static
Adding to Roy Truelove's great answer, this is how to inject the custom deserialiser in response to appearance of #JsonRawValue:
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.Module;
#Component
public class ModuleImpl extends Module {
#Override
public void setupModule(SetupContext context) {
context.addBeanDeserializerModifier(new BeanDeserializerModifierImpl());
}
}
import java.util.Iterator;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonRawValue;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.BeanDescription;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.DeserializationConfig;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.deser.BeanDeserializerBuilder;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.deser.BeanDeserializerModifier;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.deser.SettableBeanProperty;
public class BeanDeserializerModifierImpl extends BeanDeserializerModifier {
#Override
public BeanDeserializerBuilder updateBuilder(DeserializationConfig config, BeanDescription beanDesc, BeanDeserializerBuilder builder) {
Iterator<SettableBeanProperty> it = builder.getProperties();
while (it.hasNext()) {
SettableBeanProperty p = it.next();
if (p.getAnnotation(JsonRawValue.class) != null) {
builder.addOrReplaceProperty(p.withValueDeserializer(KeepAsJsonDeserialzier.INSTANCE), true);
}
}
return builder;
}
}
This easy solution worked for me:
public class MyObject {
private Object rawJsonValue;
public Object getRawJsonValue() {
return rawJsonValue;
}
public void setRawJsonValue(Object rawJsonValue) {
this.rawJsonValue = rawJsonValue;
}
}
So I was able to store raw value of JSON in rawJsonValue variable and then it was no problem to deserialize it (as object) with other fields back to JSON and send via my REST. Using #JsonRawValue didnt helped me because stored JSON was deserialized as String, not as object, and that was not what I wanted.
This even works in a JPA entity:
private String json;
#JsonRawValue
public String getJson() {
return json;
}
public void setJson(final String json) {
this.json = json;
}
#JsonProperty(value = "json")
public void setJsonRaw(JsonNode jsonNode) {
// this leads to non-standard json, see discussion:
// setJson(jsonNode.toString());
StringWriter stringWriter = new StringWriter();
ObjectMapper objectMapper = new ObjectMapper();
JsonGenerator generator =
new JsonFactory(objectMapper).createGenerator(stringWriter);
generator.writeTree(n);
setJson(stringWriter.toString());
}
Ideally the ObjectMapper and even JsonFactory are from the context and are configured so as to handle your JSON correctly (standard or with non-standard values like 'Infinity' floats for example).
Here is a full working example of how to use Jackson modules to make #JsonRawValue work both ways (serialization and deserialization):
public class JsonRawValueDeserializerModule extends SimpleModule {
public JsonRawValueDeserializerModule() {
setDeserializerModifier(new JsonRawValueDeserializerModifier());
}
private static class JsonRawValueDeserializerModifier extends BeanDeserializerModifier {
#Override
public BeanDeserializerBuilder updateBuilder(DeserializationConfig config, BeanDescription beanDesc, BeanDeserializerBuilder builder) {
builder.getProperties().forEachRemaining(property -> {
if (property.getAnnotation(JsonRawValue.class) != null) {
builder.addOrReplaceProperty(property.withValueDeserializer(JsonRawValueDeserializer.INSTANCE), true);
}
});
return builder;
}
}
private static class JsonRawValueDeserializer extends JsonDeserializer<String> {
private static final JsonDeserializer<String> INSTANCE = new JsonRawValueDeserializer();
#Override
public String deserialize(JsonParser p, DeserializationContext ctxt) throws IOException, JsonProcessingException {
return p.readValueAsTree().toString();
}
}
}
Then you can register the module after creating the ObjectMapper:
ObjectMapper objectMapper = new ObjectMapper();
objectMapper.registerModule(new JsonRawValueDeserializerModule());
String json = "{\"foo\":\"one\",\"bar\":{\"A\":false}}";
Pojo deserialized = objectMapper.readValue(json, Pojo.class);
I had the exact same issue.
I found the solution in this post :
Parse JSON tree to plain class using Jackson or its alternatives
Check out the last answer.
By defining a custom setter for the property that takes a JsonNode as parameter and calls the toString method on the jsonNode to set the String property, it all works out.
Using an object works fine both ways... This method has a bit of overhead deserializing the raw value in two times.
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
RawJsonValue value = new RawJsonValue();
value.setRawValue(new RawHello(){{this.data = "universe...";}});
String json = mapper.writeValueAsString(value);
System.out.println(json);
RawJsonValue result = mapper.readValue(json, RawJsonValue.class);
json = mapper.writeValueAsString(result.getRawValue());
System.out.println(json);
RawHello hello = mapper.readValue(json, RawHello.class);
System.out.println(hello.data);
RawHello.java
public class RawHello {
public String data;
}
RawJsonValue.java
public class RawJsonValue {
private Object rawValue;
public Object getRawValue() {
return rawValue;
}
public void setRawValue(Object value) {
this.rawValue = value;
}
}
I had a similar problem, but using a list with a lot of JSON itens (List<String>).
public class Errors {
private Integer status;
private List<String> jsons;
}
I managed the serialization using the #JsonRawValue annotation. But for deserialization I had to create a custom deserializer based on Roy's suggestion.
public class Errors {
private Integer status;
#JsonRawValue
#JsonDeserialize(using = JsonListPassThroughDeserialzier.class)
private List<String> jsons;
}
Below you can see my "List" deserializer.
public class JsonListPassThroughDeserializer extends JsonDeserializer<List<String>> {
#Override
public List<String> deserialize(JsonParser jp, DeserializationContext cxt) throws IOException, JsonProcessingException {
if (jp.getCurrentToken() == JsonToken.START_ARRAY) {
final List<String> list = new ArrayList<>();
while (jp.nextToken() != JsonToken.END_ARRAY) {
list.add(jp.getCodec().readTree(jp).toString());
}
return list;
}
throw cxt.instantiationException(List.class, "Expected Json list");
}
}