We have multiple third party pojo which we wan to combine into single pojo and use that single pojo to map to a JSON using jackson.
third party pojo -
public class ThirdPartyPojo1 {
private String random1
//public setters and getters
}
public class ThirdPartyPojo2 {
private String random2
//public setters and getters
}
we wan to combine these to form a single pojo like -
public class ourPojo {
private String random1;
private String random2;
//public setters and getters
}
we will use jackon to serialize this into a JSON string. How can we achieve this?
This is my way to solve your question. I am not sure if it has better solution so you may take this as a reference. I use ObjectReader readerForUpdating() to merge multiple json sources but this is limited to shallow copy. You may need another way to do with more complicated object. Here is my code:
package jackson;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.core.JsonProcessingException;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectReader;
public class Test {
static ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
// Create instance and convert it to json
ThirdPartyPojo1 obj1 = new ThirdPartyPojo1();
obj1.setRandom1("value 1");
String json1 = toJson(obj1);
// Create instance and convert it to json
ThirdPartyPojo2 obj2 = new ThirdPartyPojo2();
obj2.setRandom2("value 2");
String json2 = toJson(obj2);
// Suppose the field names of ThirdPartyPojo are corresponding to ourPojo
// Firstly, use ObjectMapper readValue() to get ThirdPartyPojo1 field i.e. random1
ourPojo obj3 = mapper.readValue(json1, ourPojo.class);
// Secondly, use ObjectReader to update ourPojo object
// Notes that it makes shallow copy only
ObjectReader updater = mapper.readerForUpdating(obj3);
// Update ourPojo from ThirdPartyPojo2 field i.e. random2
obj3 = updater.readValue(json2);
// The result displays a merging json from your single POJO
System.out.println(toJson(obj3));
}
static String toJson(Object obj) throws JsonProcessingException {
return mapper.writeValueAsString(obj);
}
}
class ThirdPartyPojo1 {
private String random1;
// public setters and getters
}
class ThirdPartyPojo2 {
private String random2;
// public setters and getters
}
class ourPojo {
private String random1;
private String random2;
//public setters and getters
}
Maven:
<!-- https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.fasterxml.jackson.core/jackson-databind -->
<dependency>
<groupId>com.fasterxml.jackson.core</groupId>
<artifactId>jackson-databind</artifactId>
<version>2.14.1</version>
</dependency>
Related
I have a Pojo class with all numeric fields
public class Pojo {
private long field1;
private long field2;
private long field3;
private long field4;
private long field5;
private double field6;
private double field7;
private double field8;
private double field9;
}
And there is a list of Pojo, I want map this list to one Pojo object which will contain in its field the of pojos foe, list. I mean someething like this :
public static void main(String[] args) {
List<Pojo> pojoList = getPogoList();
Pojo pojoInSum = reduceAllFields(pojoList);
}
What is the simplest way to reduce all fields of pojos from list without reflection?
You could use the Stream#reduce method:
public void reducePojoList() {
PojoReduce pojoReduce = new PojoReduce();
List<Pojo> pojoList = Arrays.asList(
new Pojo(3L, 4.0),
new Pojo(6L, 1.1));
Optional<Pojo> reducedPojo = pojoList.stream().reduce(this::combine);
reducedPojo.ifPresent(System.out::println);
}
private Pojo combine(Pojo pojo1, Pojo pojo2) {
return new Pojo(
pojo1.getLongField() + pojo2.getLongField(),
pojo1.getDoubleField() + pojo2.getDoubleField()
);
}
You would have to update the combine method for every field you add though. You'd also be creating a lot of new objects.
The simplest way is to write a method in that pojo. Because if you are modeling a thing in a class you should expose behavior and not data.
But I doubt that is what you are looking for so you might want to look at reflection.
Basically you retrieve all the fields of a class, get the values for the instance and then sum them in a loop or stream.
How can I convert the JSON string like this:
{ "summary": {
"totalMR":4.599000000000903E12,
"totalMA":1.9174920000386694E11,
"totalQA":5.1111111181E9,
"totalQR":1.000020666115264E11
},
"result": [{},{}],
"success":"true",
"total":49
}
to a Java object. I went through many similar posts and implemented constructors but couldn't find the proper explanation of why I'm unable to De-serialize the JSON.
Am I doing anything wrong?
My Class:
public class expResponse {
private String success;
private String total;
private ArrayList<LinkedHashMap<String,Object>> result;
private LinkedHashMap<String,SummaryResponse> summary;
// Constructor: public expResponse(){}
// Getter and Setter
}
public class SummaryResponse {
private Float totalQR;
private Float totalQA;
private Float totalMR;
private Float totalMA;
public SummaryResponse(){}
// Setter and Getter
}
My Code:
private expResponse processResult(String result) throws IOException{
ObjectMapper objectMapper = new ObjectMapper();
expResponse expResponseObj =
objectMapper.readValue(result, expResponse.class);
return expResponseObj;
The json you posted would not deserialize into a map of SummaryResponse objects, but rather an individual SummaryResponse object. To make your binding work, you would have to have json that looked something like this:
{
...
'summary': {
'summary1': {"totalMR":4.599000000000903E12,"totalMA":1.9174920000386694E11,"totalQA":5.1111111181E9,"totalQR":1.000020666115264E11}
'summary2': {"totalMR":4.599000000000903E12,"totalMA":1.9174920000386694E11,"totalQA":5.1111111181E9,"totalQR":1.000020666115264E11}
}
...
}
Alternatively, if you need to make your Java class conform to the json you provided, you simply need to change the declaration of summary:
private SummaryResponse summary;
Field summary in your json is an object of type SummaryResponse and not a LinkedHashMap.
public class ExpResponse {
private String success;
private String total;
private ArrayList<LinkedHashMap<String,Object>> result;
private Summary summary;
}
I don't think you have a problem in the code. Your input fails because it is not in the correct format. If you try to write the same values from an object with the same values to string you get something like:
{
"success":"true",
"total":"49",
"result":null,
"summary":{
"one_summary":{
"totalQR":2000.0,
"totalQA":1500.0,
"totalMR":1000.0,
"totalMA":500.0
}
}
}
And the major difference is the one summary. This is because summary is a map and maps need a key for each entryset. That means that summary is your map which has a one_summary key.
Is it the SummaryResponse that can't be deserialised?
I guess your attributes should have the same name "totalMR", "totalMA"....
or you should use an annotation JsonProperty(value="totalMR") and so on.
I have this method:
private String serializeToJson(T item) {
String json;
ObjectWriter ow = new ObjectMapper().writer().withDefaultPrettyPrinter();
try {
json = ow.writeValueAsString(item);
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
json = "";
}
return json;
}
with this item:
and yet json equals:
{
"saveDate" : "12:29:29 29-Mar-02015"
}
why is failureDict not serialize?
and this is the item:
public class FailedResponses {
HashMap<String, Set<String>> failuresDict;
public String saveDate;
public FailedResponses() {
failuresDict = new HashMap<>();
}
Jackson will work magic on public fields or public getters and setters. I'd recommend that you make the fields of your object private for better encapsulation, and add the public getters/setters to allow jackson to de/serialize it.
Personally I like to use the jackson annotations to make it explicit what the object is being used for, and so that you have full control over the naming of the fields that jackson creates, without having to create non-idiomatic getter/setter or variable names
I am using Jackson for JSON serialization of a list of objects.
Here is what I get:
{"ArrayList":[{"id":1,"name":"test name"}]}
But I want this :
{"rootname":[{"id":1,"name":"test name"}]} // ie showing the string I want as the root name.
Below is my approach to this:
Interface:
public interface MyInterface {
public long getId();
public String getName();
}
Implementation class:
#JsonRootName(value = "rootname")
public class MyImpl implements MyInterface {
private final long id;
private String name;
public MyImpl(final long id,final name) {
this.id = id;
this.name = name;
}
// getters
}
JSon serialization:
public class MySerializer {
public static String serializeList(final List<MyInterface> lists) {
//check for null value.Throw Exception
final ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
mapper.configure(SerializationConfig.Feature.WRAP_ROOT_VALUE, true);
return mapper.writeValueAsString(lists);
}
}
Test:
final List<MyInterface> list = new ArrayList<MyImpl>();
MyImpl item = new MyImpl(1L,"test name");
list.add(item);
final String json = MySerializer.serializeList(list);
System.out.println(json);
Here is what I get:
{"ArrayList":[{"id":1,"name":"test name"}]}
But I want this :
{"rootname":[{"id":1,"name":"test name"}]} // ie showing the string I want as the root name.
I have tried all suggested solutions I could find but failed to achieve my goal. I have looked at:
Jackson : custom collection serialization to JSON
How do I rename the root key of a JSON with Java Jackson?
Jackson : custom collection serialization to JSON
Or am I missing something? I am using jackson 1.9.12 for this. Any help in this regard is welcome.
Well, by default Jackson uses one of two annotations when trying to determine the root name to be displayed for wrapped values - #XmlRootElement or #JsonRootName. It expects this annotation to be on the type being serialized, else it will use the simple name of the type as the root name.
In your case, you are serializing a list, which is why the root name is 'ArrayList' (simple name of the type being serialized). Each element in the list may be of a type annotated with #JsonRootName, but the list itself is not.
When the root value you are trying to wrap is a collection then you need some way of defining the wrap name:
Holder/Wrapper Class
You can create a wrapper class to hold the list, with an annotation to define the desired property name (you only need to use this method when you do not have direct control of the ObjectMapper/JSON transformation process):
class MyInterfaceList {
#JsonProperty("rootname")
private List<MyInterface> list;
public List<MyInterface> getList() {
return list;
}
public void setList(List<MyInterface> list) {
this.list = list;
}
}
final List<MyInterface> lists = new ArrayList<MyInterface>(4);
lists.add(new MyImpl(1L, "test name"));
MyInterfaceList listHolder = new MyInterfaceList();
listHolder.setList(lists);
final String json = mapper.writeValueAsString(listHolder);
Object Writer
This is the preferable option. Use a configured ObjectWriter instance to generate the JSON. In particular, we are interested in the withRootName method:
final List<MyInterface> lists = new ArrayList<MyInterface>(4);
lists.add(new MyImpl(1L, "test name"));
final ObjectWriter writer = mapper.writer().withRootName("rootName");
final String json = writer.writeValueAsString(lists);
I know, I am late , but I have better approach which don't require Holder/Wrapper Class. It picks root key from annotation.
package com.test;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonRootName;
#JsonRootName("Products")
public class ProductDTO {
private String name;
private String description;
public String getName() {
return name;
}
public void setName(String name) {
this.name = name;
}
public String getDescription() {
return description;
}
public void setDescription(String description) {
this.description = description;
}
}
Here is test class:-
package com.test;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import org.junit.Test;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonRootName;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.core.JsonGenerationException;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.JsonMappingException;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper;
public class ProductDTOTestCase {
#Test
public void testPersistAndFindById() throws JsonGenerationException, JsonMappingException, IOException {
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
ProductDTO productDTO = new ProductDTO();
productDTO.setDescription("Product 4 - Test");
ArrayList<ProductDTO> arrayList = new ArrayList<ProductDTO>();
arrayList.add(productDTO);
String rootName = ProductDTO.class.getAnnotation(JsonRootName.class).value();
System.out.println(mapper.writer().withRootName(rootName).writeValueAsString(arrayList));
}
}
It will give following output
{"Products":[{"name":null,"description":"Product 4 - Test"}]}
#JsonTypeName("usuarios")
#JsonTypeInfo(include= JsonTypeInfo.As.WRAPPER_OBJECT,use= JsonTypeInfo.Id.NAME)
public class UsuarioDT extends ArrayList<Usuario> {
#JsonProperty("rowsAffected")
private Integer afectados;
public Integer getAfectados() {
return afectados;
}
public void setAfectados(Integer afectados) {
this.afectados = afectados;
}
}
You need to use this annotation at the top of the class
#JsonTypeName("rootname")
I am trying to include raw JSON inside a Java object when the object is (de)serialized using Jackson. In order to test this functionality, I wrote the following test:
public static class Pojo {
public String foo;
#JsonRawValue
public String bar;
}
#Test
public void test() throws JsonGenerationException, JsonMappingException, IOException {
String foo = "one";
String bar = "{\"A\":false}";
Pojo pojo = new Pojo();
pojo.foo = foo;
pojo.bar = bar;
String json = "{\"foo\":\"" + foo + "\",\"bar\":" + bar + "}";
ObjectMapper objectMapper = new ObjectMapper();
String output = objectMapper.writeValueAsString(pojo);
System.out.println(output);
assertEquals(json, output);
Pojo deserialized = objectMapper.readValue(output, Pojo.class);
assertEquals(foo, deserialized.foo);
assertEquals(bar, deserialized.bar);
}
The code outputs the following line:
{"foo":"one","bar":{"A":false}}
The JSON is exactly how I want things to look. Unfortunately, the code fails with an exception when attempting to read the JSON back in to the object. Here is the exception:
org.codehaus.jackson.map.JsonMappingException: Can not deserialize instance of java.lang.String out of START_OBJECT token
at [Source: java.io.StringReader#d70d7a; line: 1, column: 13] (through reference chain: com.tnal.prism.cobalt.gather.testing.Pojo["bar"])
Why does Jackson function just fine in one direction but fail when going the other direction? It seems like it should be able to take its own output as input again. I know what I'm trying to do is unorthodox (the general advice is to create an inner object for bar that has a property named A), but I don't want to interact with this JSON at all. My code is acting as a pass-through for this code -- I want to take in this JSON and send it back out again without touching a thing, because when the JSON changes I don't want my code to need modifications.
Thanks for the advice.
EDIT: Made Pojo a static class, which was causing a different error.
#JsonRawValue is intended for serialization-side only, since the reverse direction is a bit trickier to handle. In effect it was added to allow injecting pre-encoded content.
I guess it would be possible to add support for reverse, although that would be quite awkward: content will have to be parsed, and then re-written back to "raw" form, which may or may not be the same (since character quoting may differ).
This for general case. But perhaps it would make sense for some subset of problems.
But I think a work-around for your specific case would be to specify type as 'java.lang.Object', since this should work ok: for serialization, String will be output as is, and for deserialization, it will be deserialized as a Map. Actually you might want to have separate getter/setter if so; getter would return String for serialization (and needs #JsonRawValue); and setter would take either Map or Object. You could re-encode it to a String if that makes sense.
Following #StaxMan answer, I've made the following works like a charm:
public class Pojo {
Object json;
#JsonRawValue
public String getJson() {
// default raw value: null or "[]"
return json == null ? null : json.toString();
}
public void setJson(JsonNode node) {
this.json = node;
}
}
And, to be faithful to the initial question, here is the working test:
public class PojoTest {
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
#Test
public void test() throws IOException {
Pojo pojo = new Pojo("{\"foo\":18}");
String output = mapper.writeValueAsString(pojo);
assertThat(output).isEqualTo("{\"json\":{\"foo\":18}}");
Pojo deserialized = mapper.readValue(output, Pojo.class);
assertThat(deserialized.json.toString()).isEqualTo("{\"foo\":18}");
// deserialized.json == {"foo":18}
}
}
I was able to do this with a custom deserializer (cut and pasted from here)
package etc;
import java.io.IOException;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.core.JsonParser;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.core.JsonProcessingException;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.core.TreeNode;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.DeserializationContext;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.JsonDeserializer;
/**
* Keeps json value as json, does not try to deserialize it
* #author roytruelove
*
*/
public class KeepAsJsonDeserializer extends JsonDeserializer<String> {
#Override
public String deserialize(JsonParser jp, DeserializationContext ctxt)
throws IOException {
TreeNode tree = jp.getCodec().readTree(jp);
return tree.toString();
}
}
Use it by annotating the desired member like this:
#JsonDeserialize(using = KeepAsJsonDeserializer.class)
private String value;
#JsonSetter may help. See my sample ('data' is supposed to contain unparsed JSON):
class Purchase
{
String data;
#JsonProperty("signature")
String signature;
#JsonSetter("data")
void setData(JsonNode data)
{
this.data = data.toString();
}
}
This is a problem with your inner classes. The Pojo class is a non-static inner class of your test class, and Jackson cannot instantiate that class. So it can serialize, but not deserialize.
Redefine your class like this:
public static class Pojo {
public String foo;
#JsonRawValue
public String bar;
}
Note the addition of static
Adding to Roy Truelove's great answer, this is how to inject the custom deserialiser in response to appearance of #JsonRawValue:
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.Module;
#Component
public class ModuleImpl extends Module {
#Override
public void setupModule(SetupContext context) {
context.addBeanDeserializerModifier(new BeanDeserializerModifierImpl());
}
}
import java.util.Iterator;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonRawValue;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.BeanDescription;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.DeserializationConfig;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.deser.BeanDeserializerBuilder;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.deser.BeanDeserializerModifier;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.deser.SettableBeanProperty;
public class BeanDeserializerModifierImpl extends BeanDeserializerModifier {
#Override
public BeanDeserializerBuilder updateBuilder(DeserializationConfig config, BeanDescription beanDesc, BeanDeserializerBuilder builder) {
Iterator<SettableBeanProperty> it = builder.getProperties();
while (it.hasNext()) {
SettableBeanProperty p = it.next();
if (p.getAnnotation(JsonRawValue.class) != null) {
builder.addOrReplaceProperty(p.withValueDeserializer(KeepAsJsonDeserialzier.INSTANCE), true);
}
}
return builder;
}
}
This easy solution worked for me:
public class MyObject {
private Object rawJsonValue;
public Object getRawJsonValue() {
return rawJsonValue;
}
public void setRawJsonValue(Object rawJsonValue) {
this.rawJsonValue = rawJsonValue;
}
}
So I was able to store raw value of JSON in rawJsonValue variable and then it was no problem to deserialize it (as object) with other fields back to JSON and send via my REST. Using #JsonRawValue didnt helped me because stored JSON was deserialized as String, not as object, and that was not what I wanted.
This even works in a JPA entity:
private String json;
#JsonRawValue
public String getJson() {
return json;
}
public void setJson(final String json) {
this.json = json;
}
#JsonProperty(value = "json")
public void setJsonRaw(JsonNode jsonNode) {
// this leads to non-standard json, see discussion:
// setJson(jsonNode.toString());
StringWriter stringWriter = new StringWriter();
ObjectMapper objectMapper = new ObjectMapper();
JsonGenerator generator =
new JsonFactory(objectMapper).createGenerator(stringWriter);
generator.writeTree(n);
setJson(stringWriter.toString());
}
Ideally the ObjectMapper and even JsonFactory are from the context and are configured so as to handle your JSON correctly (standard or with non-standard values like 'Infinity' floats for example).
Here is a full working example of how to use Jackson modules to make #JsonRawValue work both ways (serialization and deserialization):
public class JsonRawValueDeserializerModule extends SimpleModule {
public JsonRawValueDeserializerModule() {
setDeserializerModifier(new JsonRawValueDeserializerModifier());
}
private static class JsonRawValueDeserializerModifier extends BeanDeserializerModifier {
#Override
public BeanDeserializerBuilder updateBuilder(DeserializationConfig config, BeanDescription beanDesc, BeanDeserializerBuilder builder) {
builder.getProperties().forEachRemaining(property -> {
if (property.getAnnotation(JsonRawValue.class) != null) {
builder.addOrReplaceProperty(property.withValueDeserializer(JsonRawValueDeserializer.INSTANCE), true);
}
});
return builder;
}
}
private static class JsonRawValueDeserializer extends JsonDeserializer<String> {
private static final JsonDeserializer<String> INSTANCE = new JsonRawValueDeserializer();
#Override
public String deserialize(JsonParser p, DeserializationContext ctxt) throws IOException, JsonProcessingException {
return p.readValueAsTree().toString();
}
}
}
Then you can register the module after creating the ObjectMapper:
ObjectMapper objectMapper = new ObjectMapper();
objectMapper.registerModule(new JsonRawValueDeserializerModule());
String json = "{\"foo\":\"one\",\"bar\":{\"A\":false}}";
Pojo deserialized = objectMapper.readValue(json, Pojo.class);
I had the exact same issue.
I found the solution in this post :
Parse JSON tree to plain class using Jackson or its alternatives
Check out the last answer.
By defining a custom setter for the property that takes a JsonNode as parameter and calls the toString method on the jsonNode to set the String property, it all works out.
Using an object works fine both ways... This method has a bit of overhead deserializing the raw value in two times.
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
RawJsonValue value = new RawJsonValue();
value.setRawValue(new RawHello(){{this.data = "universe...";}});
String json = mapper.writeValueAsString(value);
System.out.println(json);
RawJsonValue result = mapper.readValue(json, RawJsonValue.class);
json = mapper.writeValueAsString(result.getRawValue());
System.out.println(json);
RawHello hello = mapper.readValue(json, RawHello.class);
System.out.println(hello.data);
RawHello.java
public class RawHello {
public String data;
}
RawJsonValue.java
public class RawJsonValue {
private Object rawValue;
public Object getRawValue() {
return rawValue;
}
public void setRawValue(Object value) {
this.rawValue = value;
}
}
I had a similar problem, but using a list with a lot of JSON itens (List<String>).
public class Errors {
private Integer status;
private List<String> jsons;
}
I managed the serialization using the #JsonRawValue annotation. But for deserialization I had to create a custom deserializer based on Roy's suggestion.
public class Errors {
private Integer status;
#JsonRawValue
#JsonDeserialize(using = JsonListPassThroughDeserialzier.class)
private List<String> jsons;
}
Below you can see my "List" deserializer.
public class JsonListPassThroughDeserializer extends JsonDeserializer<List<String>> {
#Override
public List<String> deserialize(JsonParser jp, DeserializationContext cxt) throws IOException, JsonProcessingException {
if (jp.getCurrentToken() == JsonToken.START_ARRAY) {
final List<String> list = new ArrayList<>();
while (jp.nextToken() != JsonToken.END_ARRAY) {
list.add(jp.getCodec().readTree(jp).toString());
}
return list;
}
throw cxt.instantiationException(List.class, "Expected Json list");
}
}