Related
If I have the value "foo", and a HashMap<String> ftw for which ftw.containsValue("foo") returns true, how can I get the corresponding key? Do I have to loop through the hashmap? What is the best way to do that?
If your data structure has many-to-one mapping between keys and values you should iterate over entries and pick all suitable keys:
public static <T, E> Set<T> getKeysByValue(Map<T, E> map, E value) {
Set<T> keys = new HashSet<T>();
for (Entry<T, E> entry : map.entrySet()) {
if (Objects.equals(value, entry.getValue())) {
keys.add(entry.getKey());
}
}
return keys;
}
In case of one-to-one relationship, you can return the first matched key:
public static <T, E> T getKeyByValue(Map<T, E> map, E value) {
for (Entry<T, E> entry : map.entrySet()) {
if (Objects.equals(value, entry.getValue())) {
return entry.getKey();
}
}
return null;
}
In Java 8:
public static <T, E> Set<T> getKeysByValue(Map<T, E> map, E value) {
return map.entrySet()
.stream()
.filter(entry -> Objects.equals(entry.getValue(), value))
.map(Map.Entry::getKey)
.collect(Collectors.toSet());
}
Also, for Guava users, BiMap may be useful. For example:
BiMap<Token, Character> tokenToChar =
ImmutableBiMap.of(Token.LEFT_BRACKET, '[', Token.LEFT_PARENTHESIS, '(');
Token token = tokenToChar.inverse().get('(');
Character c = tokenToChar.get(token);
If you choose to use the Commons Collections library instead of the standard Java Collections framework, you can achieve this with ease.
The BidiMap interface in the Collections library is a bi-directional map, allowing you to map a key to a value (like normal maps), and also to map a value to a key, thus allowing you to perform lookups in both directions. Obtaining a key for a value is supported by the getKey() method.
There is a caveat though, bidi maps cannot have multiple values mapped to keys, and hence unless your data set has 1:1 mappings between keys and values, you cannot use bidi maps.
If you want to rely on the Java Collections API, you will have to ensure the 1:1 relationship between keys and values at the time of inserting the value into the map. This is easier said than done.
Once you can ensure that, use the entrySet() method to obtain the set of entries (mappings) in the Map. Once you have obtained the set whose type is Map.Entry, iterate through the entries, comparing the stored value against the expected, and obtain the corresponding key.
Support for bidi maps with generics can be found in Google Guava and the refactored Commons-Collections libraries (the latter is not an Apache project). Thanks to Esko for pointing out the missing generic support in Apache Commons Collections. Using collections with generics makes more maintainable code.
Since version 4.0 the official Apache Commons Collections™ library supports generics.
See the summary page of the "org.apache.commons.collections4.bidimap" package for the list of available implementations of the BidiMap, OrderedBidiMap and SortedBidiMap interfaces that now support Java generics.
public class NewClass1 {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Map<Integer, String> testMap = new HashMap<Integer, String>();
testMap.put(10, "a");
testMap.put(20, "b");
testMap.put(30, "c");
testMap.put(40, "d");
for (Entry<Integer, String> entry : testMap.entrySet()) {
if (entry.getValue().equals("c")) {
System.out.println(entry.getKey());
}
}
}
}
Some additional info... May be useful to you
Above method may not be good if your hashmap is really big. If your hashmap contain unique key to unique value mapping, you can maintain one more hashmap that contain mapping from Value to Key.
That is you have to maintain two hashmaps
1. Key to value
2. Value to key
In that case you can use second hashmap to get key.
You could insert both the key,value pair and its inverse into your map structure
map.put("theKey", "theValue");
map.put("theValue", "theKey");
Using map.get("theValue") will then return "theKey".
It's a quick and dirty way that I've made constant maps, which will only work for a select few datasets:
Contains only 1 to 1 pairs
Set of values is disjoint from the set of keys (1->2, 2->3 breaks it)
I think your choices are
Use a map implementation built for this, like the BiMap from google collections. Note that the google collections BiMap requires uniqueless of values, as well as keys, but it provides high performance in both directions performance
Manually maintain two maps - one for key -> value, and another map for value -> key
Iterate through the entrySet() and to find the keys which match the value. This is the slowest method, since it requires iterating through the entire collection, while the other two methods don't require that.
Using Java 8:
ftw.forEach((key, value) -> {
if (value.equals("foo")) {
System.out.print(key);
}
});
Decorate map with your own implementation
class MyMap<K,V> extends HashMap<K, V>{
Map<V,K> reverseMap = new HashMap<V,K>();
#Override
public V put(K key, V value) {
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
reverseMap.put(value, key);
return super.put(key, value);
}
public K getKey(V value){
return reverseMap.get(value);
}
}
There is no unambiguous answer, because multiple keys can map to the same value. If you are enforcing unique-ness with your own code, the best solution is to create a class that uses two Hashmaps to track the mappings in both directions.
If you build the map in your own code, try putting the key and value in the map together:
public class KeyValue {
public Object key;
public Object value;
public KeyValue(Object key, Object value) { ... }
}
map.put(key, new KeyValue(key, value));
Then when you have a value, you also have the key.
I think this is best solution, original address: Java2s
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.Map;
public class Main {
public static void main(String[] argv) {
Map<String, String> map = new HashMap<String, String>();
map.put("1","one");
map.put("2","two");
map.put("3","three");
map.put("4","four");
System.out.println(getKeyFromValue(map,"three"));
}
// hm is the map you are trying to get value from it
public static Object getKeyFromValue(Map hm, Object value) {
for (Object o : hm.keySet()) {
if (hm.get(o).equals(value)) {
return o;
}
}
return null;
}
}
An easy usage:
if you put all data in hasMap and you have item = "Automobile", so you are looking its key in hashMap. that is good solution.
getKeyFromValue(hashMap, item);
System.out.println("getKeyFromValue(hashMap, item): "+getKeyFromValue(hashMap, item));
To find all the keys that map to that value, iterate through all the pairs in the hashmap, using map.entrySet().
I'm afraid you'll just have to iterate your map. Shortest I could come up with:
Iterator<Map.Entry<String,String>> iter = map.entrySet().iterator();
while (iter.hasNext()) {
Map.Entry<String,String> entry = iter.next();
if (entry.getValue().equals(value_you_look_for)) {
String key_you_look_for = entry.getKey();
}
}
for(int key: hm.keySet()) {
if(hm.get(key).equals(value)) {
System.out.println(key);
}
}
It sounds like the best way is for you to iterate over entries using map.entrySet() since map.containsValue() probably does this anyway.
For Android development targeting API < 19, Vitalii Fedorenko one-to-one relationship solution doesn't work because Objects.equals isn't implemented. Here's a simple alternative:
public <K, V> K getKeyByValue(Map<K, V> map, V value) {
for (Map.Entry<K, V> entry : map.entrySet()) {
if (value.equals(entry.getValue())) {
return entry.getKey();
}
}
return null;
}
You can use the below:
public class HashmapKeyExist {
public static void main(String[] args) {
HashMap<String, String> hmap = new HashMap<String, String>();
hmap.put("1", "Bala");
hmap.put("2", "Test");
Boolean cantain = hmap.containsValue("Bala");
if(hmap.containsKey("2") && hmap.containsValue("Test"))
{
System.out.println("Yes");
}
if(cantain == true)
{
System.out.println("Yes");
}
Set setkeys = hmap.keySet();
Iterator it = setkeys.iterator();
while(it.hasNext())
{
String key = (String) it.next();
if (hmap.get(key).equals("Bala"))
{
System.out.println(key);
}
}
}
}
I think keySet() may be well to find the keys mapping to the value, and have a better coding style than entrySet().
Ex:
Suppose you have a HashMap map, ArrayList res, a value you want to find all the key mapping to , then store keys to the res.
You can write code below:
for (int key : map.keySet()) {
if (map.get(key) == value) {
res.add(key);
}
}
rather than use entrySet() below:
for (Map.Entry s : map.entrySet()) {
if ((int)s.getValue() == value) {
res.add((int)s.getKey());
}
}
Hope it helps :)
Yes, you have to loop through the hashmap, unless you implement something along the lines of what these various answers suggest. Rather than fiddling with the entrySet, I'd just get the keySet(), iterate over that set, and keep the (first) key that gets you your matching value. If you need all the keys that match that value, obviously you have to do the whole thing.
As Jonas suggests, this might already be what the containsValue method is doing, so you might just skip that test all-together, and just do the iteration every time (or maybe the compiler will already eliminate the redundancy, who knows).
Also, relative to the other answers, if your reverse map looks like
Map<Value, Set<Key>>
you can deal with non-unique key->value mappings, if you need that capability (untangling them aside). That would incorporate fine into any of the solutions people suggest here using two maps.
You can get the key using values using following code..
ArrayList valuesList = new ArrayList();
Set keySet = initalMap.keySet();
ArrayList keyList = new ArrayList(keySet);
for(int i = 0 ; i < keyList.size() ; i++ ) {
valuesList.add(initalMap.get(keyList.get(i)));
}
Collections.sort(valuesList);
Map finalMap = new TreeMap();
for(int i = 0 ; i < valuesList.size() ; i++ ) {
String value = (String) valuesList.get(i);
for( int j = 0 ; j < keyList.size() ; j++ ) {
if(initalMap.get(keyList.get(j)).equals(value)) {
finalMap.put(keyList.get(j),value);
}
}
}
System.out.println("fianl map ----------------------> " + finalMap);
public static class SmartHashMap <T1 extends Object, T2 extends Object> {
public HashMap<T1, T2> keyValue;
public HashMap<T2, T1> valueKey;
public SmartHashMap(){
this.keyValue = new HashMap<T1, T2>();
this.valueKey = new HashMap<T2, T1>();
}
public void add(T1 key, T2 value){
this.keyValue.put(key, value);
this.valueKey.put(value, key);
}
public T2 getValue(T1 key){
return this.keyValue.get(key);
}
public T1 getKey(T2 value){
return this.valueKey.get(value);
}
}
In java8
map.entrySet().stream().filter(entry -> entry.getValue().equals(value))
.forEach(entry -> System.out.println(entry.getKey()));
Use a thin wrapper: HMap
import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.Map;
public class HMap<K, V> {
private final Map<K, Map<K, V>> map;
public HMap() {
map = new HashMap<K, Map<K, V>>();
}
public HMap(final int initialCapacity) {
map = new HashMap<K, Map<K, V>>(initialCapacity);
}
public boolean containsKey(final Object key) {
return map.containsKey(key);
}
public V get(final Object key) {
final Map<K, V> entry = map.get(key);
if (entry != null)
return entry.values().iterator().next();
return null;
}
public K getKey(final Object key) {
final Map<K, V> entry = map.get(key);
if (entry != null)
return entry.keySet().iterator().next();
return null;
}
public V put(final K key, final V value) {
final Map<K, V> entry = map
.put(key, Collections.singletonMap(key, value));
if (entry != null)
return entry.values().iterator().next();
return null;
}
}
public static String getKey(Map<String, Integer> mapref, String value) {
String key = "";
for (Map.Entry<String, Integer> map : mapref.entrySet()) {
if (map.getValue().toString().equals(value)) {
key = map.getKey();
}
}
return key;
}
Simplest utility method to fetch a key of a given value from a Map:
public static void fetchValue(Map<String, Integer> map, Integer i)
{
Stream stream = map.entrySet().stream().filter(val-> val.getValue().equals(i)).map(Map.Entry::getKey);
stream.forEach(System.out::println);
}
detailed explaination:
Method fetchValue accepts the map, which has String as key and Integer as value.
Then we use entryset().stream() to convert result into a stream.
Next we use filter (intermediate operation) which gives us a value that is equal to the second argument.
Finally, we use forEach(final operation) to print our end result.
Found too many answers. Some were really great. But I was particularly looking for a way, so that I can get the value using loops.
So here is finally what I did:
For a HashMap 1-to-1 relation:
Map<String, String> map = new HashMap<String, String>();
map.put("abc", "123");
map.put("xyz", "456");
for(Entry<String, String> entry : map.entrySet()) {
if(entry.getValue().equalsIgnoreCase("456")) {
System.out.println(entry.getKey());
}
}
Output: "xyz"
For a HashMap 1-to-many relation:
Map<String, ArrayList<String>> service = new HashMap<String, ArrayList<String>>();
service.put("abc", new ArrayList<String>());
service.get("abc").add("a");
service.get("abc").add("b");
service.get("abc").add("c");
service.put("xyz", new ArrayList<String>());
service.get("xyz").add("x");
service.get("xyz").add("y");
service.get("xyz").add("z");
for(Entry<String, ArrayList<String>> entry : service.entrySet()) {
ArrayList<String> values = entry.getValue();
for(String value : values) {
if(value.equalsIgnoreCase("x")) {
System.out.println(entry.getKey());
}
}
}
Output: xyz
-Thanks
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.HashSet;
import java.util.Set;
public class ValueKeysMap<K, V> extends HashMap <K,V>{
HashMap<V, Set<K>> ValueKeysMap = new HashMap<V, Set<K>>();
#Override
public boolean containsValue(Object value) {
return ValueKeysMap.containsKey(value);
}
#Override
public V put(K key, V value) {
if (containsValue(value)) {
Set<K> keys = ValueKeysMap.get(value);
keys.add(key);
} else {
Set<K> keys = new HashSet<K>();
keys.add(key);
ValueKeysMap.put(value, keys);
}
return super.put(key, value);
}
#Override
public V remove(Object key) {
V value = super.remove(key);
Set<K> keys = ValueKeysMap.get(value);
keys.remove(key);
if(keys.size() == 0) {
ValueKeysMap.remove(value);
}
return value;
}
public Set<K> getKeys4ThisValue(V value){
Set<K> keys = ValueKeysMap.get(value);
return keys;
}
public boolean valueContainsThisKey(K key, V value){
if (containsValue(value)) {
Set<K> keys = ValueKeysMap.get(value);
return keys.contains(key);
}
return false;
}
/*
* Take care of argument constructor and other api's like putAll
*/
}
/**
* This method gets the Key for the given Value
* #param paramName
* #return
*/
private String getKeyForValueFromMap(String paramName) {
String keyForValue = null;
if(paramName!=null)) {
Set<Entry<String,String>> entrySet = myMap().entrySet();
if(entrySet!=null && entrySet.size>0) {
for(Entry<String,String> entry : entrySet) {
if(entry!=null && paramName.equalsIgnoreCase(entry.getValue())) {
keyForValue = entry.getKey();
}
}
}
}
return keyForValue;
}
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.Iterator;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Set;
public class M{
public static void main(String[] args) {
HashMap<String, List<String>> resultHashMap = new HashMap<String, List<String>>();
Set<String> newKeyList = resultHashMap.keySet();
for (Iterator<String> iterator = originalHashMap.keySet().iterator(); iterator.hasNext();) {
String hashKey = (String) iterator.next();
if (!newKeyList.contains(originalHashMap.get(hashKey))) {
List<String> loArrayList = new ArrayList<String>();
loArrayList.add(hashKey);
resultHashMap.put(originalHashMap.get(hashKey), loArrayList);
} else {
List<String> loArrayList = resultHashMap.get(originalHashMap
.get(hashKey));
loArrayList.add(hashKey);
resultHashMap.put(originalHashMap.get(hashKey), loArrayList);
}
}
System.out.println("Original HashMap : " + originalHashMap);
System.out.println("Result HashMap : " + resultHashMap);
}
}
My 2 cents.
You can get the keys in an array and then loop through the array. This will affect performance of this code block if the map is pretty big , where in you are getting the keys in an array first which might consume some time and then you are looping. Otherwise for smaller maps it should be ok.
String[] keys = yourMap.keySet().toArray(new String[0]);
for(int i = 0 ; i < keys.length ; i++){
//This is your key
String key = keys[i];
//This is your value
yourMap.get(key)
}
While this does not directly answer the question, it is related.
This way you don't need to keep creating/iterating. Just create a reverse map once and get what you need.
/**
* Both key and value types must define equals() and hashCode() for this to work.
* This takes into account that all keys are unique but all values may not be.
*
* #param map
* #param <K>
* #param <V>
* #return
*/
public static <K, V> Map<V, List<K>> reverseMap(Map<K,V> map) {
if(map == null) return null;
Map<V, List<K>> reverseMap = new ArrayMap<>();
for(Map.Entry<K,V> entry : map.entrySet()) {
appendValueToMapList(reverseMap, entry.getValue(), entry.getKey());
}
return reverseMap;
}
/**
* Takes into account that the list may already have values.
*
* #param map
* #param key
* #param value
* #param <K>
* #param <V>
* #return
*/
public static <K, V> Map<K, List<V>> appendValueToMapList(Map<K, List<V>> map, K key, V value) {
if(map == null || key == null || value == null) return map;
List<V> list = map.get(key);
if(list == null) {
List<V> newList = new ArrayList<>();
newList.add(value);
map.put(key, newList);
}
else {
list.add(value);
}
return map;
}
I have a map like this
Map map=new HashMap();//HashMap key random order.
map.put("a",10);
map.put("a",20);
map.put("a",30);
map.put("b",10);
System.out.println("There are "+map.size()+" elements in the map.");
System.out.println("Content of Map are...");
Set s=map.entrySet();
Iterator itr=s.iterator();
while(itr.hasNext())
{
Map.Entry m=(Map.Entry)itr.next();
System.out.println(m.getKey()+"\t"+m.getValue()+"\t"+ m.hashCode());
}
Output of the above program is
There are 2 elements in the map.
Content of Map are...
b 10 104
a 30 127
Now I want that key a should have multiple values like
a 10
a 20
a 30
So that I should get all the values associated by a. Please advise how can I achieve that same thing. By nesting of collections, I want key 'a' to have all the three values.
Have you checked out Guava Multimaps ?
A collection similar to a Map, but which may associate multiple values
with a single key. If you call put(K, V) twice, with the same key but
different values, the multimap contains mappings from the key to both
values.
If you really want to use standard collections (as suggested below), you'll have to store a collection per key e.g.
map = new HashMap<String, Collection<Integer>>();
Note that the first time you enter a new key, you'll have to create the new collection (List, Set etc.) before adding the first value.
To implement what you want using the Java standard library, I would use a map like this:
Map<String, Collection<Integer>> multiValueMap = new HashMap<String, Collection<Integer>>();
Then you can add values:
multiValueMap.put("a", new ArrayList<Integer>());
multiValueMap.get("a").add(new Integer(10));
multiValueMap.get("a").add(new Integer(20));
multiValueMap.get("a").add(new Integer(30));
If this results uncomfortable for you, consider wrapping this behaviour in a dedicated Class, or using a third-party solution, as others have suggested here (Guava Multimap).
You shouldn't ignore the generic parameters. What you have is
Map<String, Integer> map = new HashMap<>();
if you want to code the solution yourself, you need
Map<String, List<Integer>> map = new HashMap<>();
Anyhow, the preffered way is to use a Guava Multimap
Put an ArrayList instance in the value part.
void addValue(Map map, Object key, Object value) {
Object obj = map.get(key);
List list;
if (obj == null) {
list = new ArrayList<Object>();
} else {
list = ((ArrayList) obj);
}
list.add(value);
map.put(key, list);
}
For More Info check this.
Use Map with value type as list of values..For example, in your map, while adding an entry, you will put key as "a" and you will have to add it's value as a list of Integer , having all the required values, like 1,2,3,4.
For a Map with entries with same key, has no sense to use get() .But as long as you use iterator() or entrySet() this should work:
class HashMap<String, String> {
Set<Entry<String, String>> entries;
#Override
public Set<Entry<String, String>> entrySet() {
return entries;
}
#Override
public int size() {
return entries.size();
}
public String put(String key, String value) {
if (entries == null) {
entries = new AbstractSet<Entry<String, String>>() {
ArrayList<Entry<String, String>> list = new ArrayList<>();
#Override
public Iterator<Entry<String, String>> iterator() {
return list.iterator();
}
#Override
public int size() {
return list.size();
}
#Override
public boolean add(Entry<String, String> stringStringEntry) {
return list.add(stringStringEntry);
}
};
}
StatusHandler.MyEntry entry = new StatusHandler.MyEntry();
entry.setKey(key);
entry.setValue(value);
entries.add(entry);
return value;
}
};
TL;DR So, what is it useful for? That comes from a hack to redmine-java-api to accept complex queries based on form params:
https://stackoverflow.com/a/18358659/848072
https://github.com/albfan/RedmineJavaCLI/commit/2bc51901f2f8252525a2d2258593082979ba7122
I need to have an automatically sorted-by-values map in Java - so that It keeps being sorted at any time while I'm adding new key-value pairs or update the value of an existing key-value pair, or even delete some entry.
Please also have in mind that this map is going to be really big (100's of thousands, or even 10's of millions of entries in size).
So basically I'm looking for the following functionality:
Supposed that we had a class 'SortedByValuesMap' that implements the aforementioned functionality
and we have the following code:
SortedByValuesMap<String,Long> sorted_map = new SortedByValuesMap<String, Long>();
sorted_map.put("apples", 4);
sorted_map.put("oranges", 2);
sorted_map.put("bananas", 1);
sorted_map.put("lemons", 3);
sorted_map.put("bananas", 6);
for (String key : sorted_map.keySet()) {
System.out.println(key + ":" + sorted_map.get(key));
}
the output should be:
bananas:6
apples:4
lemons:3
oranges:2
In particular, what's really important for me, is to be able to get the entry with the
lowest value at any time - using a command like:
smallestItem = sorted_map.lastEntry();
which should give me the 'oranges' entry
EDIT: I am a Java newbie so please elaborate a bit in your answers - thanks
EDIT2: This might help: I am using this for counting words (for those who are familiar: n-grams in particular) in huge text files. So I need to build a map where keys are words and values are the frequencies of those words. However, due to limitations (like RAM), I want to keep only the X most frequent words - but you can't know beforehand which are going to be the most frequent words of course. So, the way I thought it might work (as an approximation) is to start counting words and when the map reaches a top-limit (like 1 mil entries) , the least frequent entry will be deleted so as to keep the map's size to 1 mil always.
Keep 2 data structures:
A dictionary of words -> count. Just use an ordinary HashMap<String, Long>.
An "array" to keep track of order, such that list[count] holds a Set<String> of words with that count.
I'm writing this as though it were an array as a notational convenience. In fact, you probably don't know an upper bound on the number of occurrences, so you need a resizable data structure. Implement using a Map<Long, Set<String>>. Or, if that uses too much memory, use an ArrayList<Set<String>> (you'll have to test for count == size() - 1, and if so, use add() instead of set(count + 1)).
To increment the number of occurrences for a word (pseudocode):
// assumes data structures are in instance variables dict and arr
public void tally(final String word)
{
final long count = this.dict.get(word) or 0 if absent;
this.dict.put(word, count + 1);
// move word up one place in arr
this.arr[count].remove(word); // This is why we use a Set: for fast deletion here.
this.arr[count + 1].add(word);
}
To iterate over words in order (pseudocode):
for(int count = 0; count < arr.size; count++)
for(final String word : this.arr[count])
process(word, count);
How about using additional index or only TreeMap<Long, TreeSet<String>> or TreeMap<Long, String> if Long values are distinct?
You can also write a Heap.
Guava BiMap Solution:
//Prepare original data
BiMap<String, Integer> biMap = HashBiMap.create();
biMap.put("apples" , 4);
biMap.put("oranges", 2);
biMap.put("bananas", 1);
biMap.put("lemons" , 3);
biMap.put("bananas", 6);
//Create a desc order SortedMap
SortedMap<Integer, String> sortedMap = new TreeMap<Integer, String>(new Comparator<Integer>(){
#Override public int compare(Integer o1, Integer o2) {
return o2-o1;
}});
//Put inversed map
sortedMap.putAll(biMap.inverse());
for (Map.Entry<Integer, String> e: sortedMap.entrySet()) {
System.out.println(e);
}
System.out.println(sortedMap.lastKey());
Try the solution posted on http://paaloliver.wordpress.com/2006/01/24/sorting-maps-in-java/ . You have the flexibility of doing sorting ascending or descending too.
Here is what they say
import java.util.Comparator;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.Iterator;
import java.util.Map;
import java.util.SortedMap;
import java.util.TreeMap;
public class MapValueSort {
/** inner class to do soring of the map **/
private static class ValueComparer implements Comparator<String> {
private Map<String, String> _data = null;
public ValueComparer (Map<String, String> data){
super();
_data = data;
}
public int compare(String o1, String o2) {
String e1 = (String) _data.get(o1);
String e2 = (String) _data.get(o2);
return e1.compareTo(e2);
}
}
public static void main(String[] args){
Map<String, String> unsortedData = new HashMap<String, String>();
unsortedData.put("2", "DEF");
unsortedData.put("1", "ABC");
unsortedData.put("4", "ZXY");
unsortedData.put("3", "BCD");
SortedMap<String, String> sortedData = new TreeMap<String, String>(new MapValueSort.ValueComparer(unsortedData));
printMap(unsortedData);
sortedData.putAll(unsortedData);
System.out.println();
printMap(sortedData);
}
private static void printMap(Map<String, String> data) {
for (Iterator<String> iter = data.keySet().iterator(); iter.hasNext();) {
String key = (String) iter.next();
System.out.println("Value/key:"+data.get(key)+"/"+key);
}
}
}
Outputs
Value/key:BCD/3
Value/key:DEF/2
Value/key:ABC/1
Value/key:ZXY/4
Value/key:ABC/1
Value/key:BCD/3
Value/key:DEF/2
Value/key:ZXY/4
I found the need of a similar structure to keep a list of objects ordered by associated values. Based on the suggestion from Mechanical snail in this thread, I coded up a basic implementation of such a map. Feel free to use.
import java.util.*;
/**
* A map where {#link #keySet()} and {#link #entrySet()} return sets ordered
* with ascending associated values with respect to the the comparator provided
* at constuction. The order of two or more keys with identical values is not
* defined.
* <p>
* Several contracts of the Map interface are not satisfied by this minimal
* implementation.
*/
public class ValueSortedMap<K, V> extends HashMap<K, V> {
protected Map<V, Collection<K>> valueToKeysMap;
public ValueSortedMap() {
this((Comparator<? super V>) null);
}
public ValueSortedMap(Comparator<? super V> valueComparator) {
this.valueToKeysMap = new TreeMap<V, Collection<K>>(valueComparator);
}
public boolean containsValue(Object o) {
return valueToKeysMap.containsKey(o);
}
public V put(K k, V v) {
V oldV = null;
if (containsKey(k)) {
oldV = get(k);
valueToKeysMap.get(oldV).remove(k);
}
super.put(k, v);
if (!valueToKeysMap.containsKey(v)) {
Collection<K> keys = new ArrayList<K>();
keys.add(k);
valueToKeysMap.put(v, keys);
} else {
valueToKeysMap.get(v).add(k);
}
return oldV;
}
public void putAll(Map<? extends K, ? extends V> m) {
for (Map.Entry<? extends K, ? extends V> e : m.entrySet())
put(e.getKey(), e.getValue());
}
public V remove(Object k) {
V oldV = null;
if (containsKey(k)) {
oldV = get(k);
super.remove(k);
valueToKeysMap.get(oldV).remove(k);
}
return oldV;
}
public void clear() {
super.clear();
valueToKeysMap.clear();
}
public Set<K> keySet() {
LinkedHashSet<K> ret = new LinkedHashSet<K>(size());
for (V v : valueToKeysMap.keySet()) {
Collection<K> keys = valueToKeysMap.get(v);
ret.addAll(keys);
}
return ret;
}
public Set<Map.Entry<K, V>> entrySet() {
LinkedHashSet<Map.Entry<K, V>> ret = new LinkedHashSet<Map.Entry<K, V>>(size());
for (Collection<K> keys : valueToKeysMap.values()) {
for (final K k : keys) {
final V v = get(k);
ret.add(new Map.Entry<K,V>() {
public K getKey() {
return k;
}
public V getValue() {
return v;
}
public V setValue(V v) {
throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
}
});
}
}
return ret;
}
}
This implementation does not honor all the contracts of the Map interface such as reflecting value changes and removals in the returned key set and entry sets in the actual map, but such a solution would be a bit large to include in a forum like this. Perhaps I will work on one and make it available via github or something similar.
Update: You cannot sort maps by values, sorry.
You can use SortedMap implementation like TreeMap with Comparator defining order by values (instead of default - by keys).
Or, even better, you can put elements into a PriorityQueue with predefined comparator by values. It should be faster and take less memory compared to TreeMap.
You may refer to the implementation of java.util.LinkedHashMap.
The basic idea is, using a inner linked list to store orders. Here is some details:
Extends from HashMap. In HashMap, each entry has a key and value, that is basic. You can Add a next and a prev pointer to store entries in order by value. And a header and tail pointer to get the first and last entry. For every modification (add, remove, update), you can add your own code to change the list order. It is no more than a linear search and pointer switch.
Sure it will be slow for add/update if there are too many entries because it is a linked list not array. But as long as the list is sorted, I believe there are lots of ways to speedup the search.
So here is what you got: A map that has the same speed with HashMap when retrieving an entry by a key. A linked list which stores entries in order.
We can discuss this further if this solution meets your requirement.
to jtahlborn:
As I said, it surely is slow without any optimization. Since we are talking about performance not impl now, lots of things can be done.
One solution is using a tree instead of Linked List, like Red-Black Tree. Then iterate the tree instead of iterator the map.
About the smallest value, it is easier. Just using a member variable to store the smallest, when add or update an element, update the smallest value. When delete, search the tree for the smallest (this is very fast)
if tree is too complex, it is also possible to using another list/array to mark the some positions in the list. for example, maybe 100 element each. Then when search, just search the position list first and then the real list. This list also needs to be maintained, it would be reasonable to recount the position list for certain times of modification, maybe 100.
if all you need is the "min" value, then just use a normal map and keep track of the "min" value anytime it is modified.
EDIT:
so, if you really need value ordering and you want to use out-of-the-box solutions, you basically need 2 collections. One normal map (e.g. HashMap), and one SortedSet (e.g. TreeSet>). you can traverse ordered elements via the TreeSet, and find frequencies by key using the HashMap.
obviously, you could always code up something yourself sort of like a LinkedHashMap, where the elements are locatable by key and traversable by order, but that's pretty much going to be entirely custom code (i doubt anything that specific already exists, but i could be wrong).
I am trying to use a HashMap to map a unique string to a string ArrayList like this:
HashMap<String, ArrayList<String>>
Basically, I want to be able to access the keys by number, not by using the key's name. And I want to be able to access said key's value, to iterate over it. I'm imagining something like this:
for(all keys in my hashmap) {
for(int i=0; i < myhashmap.currentKey.getValue.size(); i++) {
// do things with the hashmaps elements
}
}
Is there an easy way to do this?
Here is the general solution if you really only want the first key's value
Object firstKey = myHashMap.keySet().toArray()[0];
Object valueForFirstKey = myHashMap.get(firstKey);
You can iterate over keys by calling map.keySet(), or iterate over the entries by calling map.entrySet(). Iterating over entries will probably be faster.
for (Map.Entry<String, List<String>> entry : map.entrySet()) {
List<String> list = entry.getValue();
// Do things with the list
}
If you want to ensure that you iterate over the keys in the same order you inserted them then use a LinkedHashMap.
By the way, I'd recommend changing the declared type of the map to <String, List<String>>. Always best to declare types in terms of the interface rather than the implementation.
HashMaps are not ordered, unless you use a LinkedHashMap or SortedMap. In this case, you may want a LinkedHashMap. This will iterate in order of insertion (or in order of last access if you prefer). In this case, it would be
int index = 0;
for ( Map.Entry<String,ArrayList<String>> e : myHashMap.iterator().entrySet() ) {
String key = e.getKey();
ArrayList<String> val = e.getValue();
index++;
}
There is no direct get(index) in a map because it is an unordered list of key/value pairs. LinkedHashMap is a special case that keeps the order.
Kotlin HashMap Answer
You can get key by index. Then get value by key.
val item = HashMap<String, String>() // Dummy HashMap.
val keyByIndex = item.keys.elementAt(0) // Get key by index. I selected "0".
val valueOfElement = item.getValue(keyByIndex) // Get value.
You can do:
for(String key: hashMap.keySet()){
for(String value: hashMap.get(key)) {
// use the value here
}
}
This will iterate over every key, and then every value of the list associated with each key.
A solution is already selected. However, I post this solution for those who want to use an alternative approach:
// use LinkedHashMap if you want to read values from the hashmap in the same order as you put them into it
private ArrayList<String> getMapValueAt(LinkedHashMap<String, ArrayList<String>> hashMap, int index)
{
Map.Entry<String, ArrayList<String>> entry = (Map.Entry<String, ArrayList<String>>) hashMap.entrySet().toArray()[index];
return entry.getValue();
}
for (Object key : data.keySet()) {
String lKey = (String) key;
List<String> list = data.get(key);
}
I came across the same problem, read a couple of answers from different related questions and came up with my own class.
public class IndexableMap<K, V> extends HashMap<K, V> {
private LinkedList<K> keyList = new LinkedList<>();
#Override
public V put(K key, V value) {
if (!keyList.contains(key))
keyList.add(key);
return super.put(key, value);
}
#Override
public void putAll(Map<? extends K, ? extends V> m) {
for (Entry<? extends K, ? extends V> entry : m.entrySet()) {
put(entry.getKey(), entry.getValue());
}
}
#Override
public void clear() {
keyList.clear();
super.clear();
}
public List<K> getKeys() {
return keyList;
}
public int getKeyIndex(K key) {
return keyList.indexOf(key);
}
public K getKeyAt(int index) {
if (keyList.size() > index)
return keyList.get(index);
return null;
}
public V getValueAt(int index) {
K key = getKeyAt(index);
if (key != null)
return get(key);
return null;
}
}
Example (types are differing from OPs question just for clarity):
Map<String, Double> myMap = new IndexableMap<>();
List<String> keys = myMap.getKeys();
int keyIndex = myMap.getKeyIndex("keyString");
String key = myMap.getKeyAt(2);
Double value myMap.getValueAt(2);
Keep in mind that it does not override any of the complex methods, so you will need to do this on your own if you want to reliably access one of these.
Edit: I made a change to the putAll() method, because the old one had a rare chance to cause HashMap and LinkedList being in different states.
Try this:
myhashmap.entrySet()
.forEach{
println(it.getKey())
println(it.getValue())
}
or if you want by index
myhashmap.entrySet()[0].getKey()
myhashmap.entrySet()[0].getValue()
myhashmap.entrySet()[1].getKey()
myhashmap.entrySet()[1].getValue()
HashMaps don't keep your key/value pairs in a specific order. They are ordered based on the hash that each key's returns from its Object.hashCode() method. You can however iterate over the set of key/value pairs using an iterator with:
for (String key : hashmap.keySet())
{
for (list : hashmap.get(key))
{
//list.toString()
}
}
If you don't care about the actual key, a concise way to iterate over all the Map's values would be to use its values() method
Map<String, List<String>> myMap;
for ( List<String> stringList : myMap.values() ) {
for ( String myString : stringList ) {
// process the string here
}
}
The values() method is part of the Map interface and returns a Collection view of the values in the map.
You can use Kotlin extension function
fun LinkedHashMap<String, String>.getKeyByPosition(position: Int) =
this.keys.toTypedArray()[position]
fun LinkedHashMap<String, String>.getValueByPosition(position: Int) =
this.values.toTypedArray()[position]
You'll need to create multiple HashMaps like this for example
Map<String, String> fruitDetails = new HashMap();
fruitDetails.put("Mango", "Mango is a delicious fruit!");
fruitDetails.put("Guava" "Guava is a delicious fruit!");
fruitDetails.put("Pineapple", "Pineapple is a delicious fruit!");
Map<String, String> fruitDetails2 = new HashMap();
fruitDetails2.put("Orange", "Orange is a delicious fruit!");
fruitDetails2.put("Banana" "Banana is a delicious fruit!");
fruitDetails2.put("Apple", "Apple is a delicious fruit!");
// STEP 2: Create a numeric key based HashMap containing fruitDetails so we can access them by index
Map<Integer, Map<String, String>> hashMap = new HashMap();
hashMap.put(0, fruitDetails);
hashMap.put(1, fruitDetails2);
// Now we can successfully access the fruitDetails by index like this
String fruit1 = hashMap.get(0).get("Guava");
String fruit2 = hashMap.get(1).get("Apple");
System.out.println(fruit1); // outputs: Guava is a delicious fruit!
System.out.println(fruit2); // outputs: Apple is a delicious fruit!
I want to have a map with duplicate keys.
I know there are many map implementations (Eclipse shows me about 50), so I bet there must be one that allows this. I know it's easy to write your own map that does this, but I would rather use some existing solution.
Maybe something in commons-collections or google-collections?
You are searching for a multimap, and indeed both commons-collections and Guava have several implementations for that. Multimaps allow for multiple keys by maintaining a collection of values per key, i.e. you can put a single object into the map, but you retrieve a collection.
If you can use Java 5, I would prefer Guava's Multimap as it is generics-aware.
We don't need to depend on the Google Collections external library. You can simply implement the following Map:
Map<String, ArrayList<String>> hashMap = new HashMap<String, ArrayList>();
public static void main(String... arg) {
// Add data with duplicate keys
addValues("A", "a1");
addValues("A", "a2");
addValues("B", "b");
// View data.
Iterator it = hashMap.keySet().iterator();
ArrayList tempList = null;
while (it.hasNext()) {
String key = it.next().toString();
tempList = hashMap.get(key);
if (tempList != null) {
for (String value: tempList) {
System.out.println("Key : "+key+ " , Value : "+value);
}
}
}
}
private void addValues(String key, String value) {
ArrayList tempList = null;
if (hashMap.containsKey(key)) {
tempList = hashMap.get(key);
if(tempList == null)
tempList = new ArrayList();
tempList.add(value);
} else {
tempList = new ArrayList();
tempList.add(value);
}
hashMap.put(key,tempList);
}
Please make sure to fine tune the code.
Multimap<Integer, String> multimap = ArrayListMultimap.create();
multimap.put(1, "A");
multimap.put(1, "B");
multimap.put(1, "C");
multimap.put(1, "A");
multimap.put(2, "A");
multimap.put(2, "B");
multimap.put(2, "C");
multimap.put(3, "A");
System.out.println(multimap.get(1));
System.out.println(multimap.get(2));
System.out.println(multimap.get(3));
Output is:
[A,B,C,A]
[A,B,C]
[A]
Note: we need to import library files.
http://www.java2s.com/Code/Jar/g/Downloadgooglecollectionsjar.htm
import com.google.common.collect.ArrayListMultimap;
import com.google.common.collect.Multimap;
or https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-collections/download_collections.cgi
import org.apache.commons.collections.MultiMap;
import org.apache.commons.collections.map.MultiValueMap;
You could simply pass an array of values for the value in a regular HashMap, thus simulating duplicate keys, and it would be up to you to decide what data to use.
You may also just use a MultiMap, although I do not like the idea of duplicate keys myself.
If you want iterate about a list of key-value-pairs (as you wrote in the comment), then a List or an array should be better. First combine your keys and values:
public class Pair
{
public Class1 key;
public Class2 value;
public Pair(Class1 key, Class2 value)
{
this.key = key;
this.value = value;
}
}
Replace Class1 and Class2 with the types you want to use for keys and values.
Now you can put them into an array or a list and iterate over them:
Pair[] pairs = new Pair[10];
...
for (Pair pair : pairs)
{
...
}
This problem can be solved with a list of map entry List<Map.Entry<K,V>>. We don't need to use neither external libraries nor new implementation of Map. A map entry can be created like this:
Map.Entry<String, Integer> entry = new AbstractMap.SimpleEntry<String, Integer>("key", 1);
[June, 2021]
org.springframework.util.MultiValueMap
commons.apache.org - org.apache.commons.collections4
Learn from my mistakes...please don't implement this on your own.
Guava multimap is the way to go.
A common enhancement required in multimaps is to disallow duplicate keys-value pairs.
Implementing/changing this in a your implementation can be annoying.
In Guava its as simple as:
HashMultimap<String, Integer> no_dupe_key_plus_val = HashMultimap.create();
ArrayListMultimap<String, Integer> allow_dupe_key_plus_val = ArrayListMultimap.create();
No fancy libs required.
Maps are defined by a unique key, so dont bend them, use a list. Streams are mighty.
import java.util.AbstractMap.SimpleImmutableEntry;
List<SimpleImmutableEntry<String, String>> nameToLocationMap = Arrays.asList(
new SimpleImmutableEntry<>("A", "A1"),
new SimpleImmutableEntry<>("A", "A2"),
new SimpleImmutableEntry<>("B", "B1"),
new SimpleImmutableEntry<>("B", "B1"),
);
And thats it.
Usage examples:
List<String> allBsLocations = nameToLocationMap.stream()
.filter(x -> x.getKey().equals("B"))
.map(x -> x.getValue())
.collect(Collectors.toList());
nameToLocationMap.stream().forEach(x ->
do stuff with: x.getKey()...x.getValue()...
You can use a TreeMap with a custom Comparator in order to treat each key as unequal to the others. It would also preserve the insertion order in your map, just like a LinkedHashMap. So, the net result would be like a LinkedHashMap which allows duplicate keys!
This is a very simple implementation without the need of any third party dependencies or complications of MultiMaps.
import java.util.Map;
import java.util.TreeMap;
...
...
//Define a TreeMap with a custom Comparator
Map<Integer, String> map = new TreeMap<>((a, b) -> 1); // See notes 1 and 2
//Populate the map
map.put(1, "One");
map.put(3, "Three");
map.put(1, "One One");
map.put(7, "Seven");
map.put(2, "Two");
map.put(1, "One One One");
//Display the map entries:
map.entrySet().forEach(System.out::println);
//See note number 3 for the following:
Map<Integer, String> sortedTreeMap = map.entrySet().stream()
.sorted(Map.Entry.comparingByKey())
.collect(Collectors.toMap(
Map.Entry::getKey, Map.Entry::getValue,
(x, y) -> x, () -> new TreeMap<>((a, b) -> 1)
));
//Display the entries of this sorted TreeMap:
sortedTreeMap.entrySet().forEach(System.out::println);
...
Notes:
You can also use any positive integer in place of 1 in the comparator's definition here.
If you use any negative integer instead, then it will reverse the insertion order in your map.
If you also want to sort this map based on the keys (which is the default behavior of a TreeMap), then you may do this operation on the current map.
I had a slightly different variant of this issue: It was required to associate two different values with same key. Just posting it here in case it helps others, I have introduced a HashMap as the value:
/* #param frameTypeHash: Key -> Integer (frameID), Value -> HashMap (innerMap)
#param innerMap: Key -> String (extIP), Value -> String
If the key exists, retrieve the stored HashMap innerMap
and put the constructed key, value pair
*/
if (frameTypeHash.containsKey(frameID)){
//Key exists, add the key/value to innerHashMap
HashMap innerMap = (HashMap)frameTypeHash.get(frameID);
innerMap.put(extIP, connName+":"+frameType+":"+interfaceName);
} else {
HashMap<String, String> innerMap = new HashMap<String, String>();
innerMap.put(extIP, connName+":"+frameType+":"+interfaceName);
// This means the key doesn't exists, adding it for the first time
frameTypeHash.put(frameID, innerMap );
}
}
In the above code the key frameID is read from a input file's first string in each line, the value for frameTypeHash is constructed by splitting the remaining line and was stored as String object originally, over a period of time the file started having multiple lines (with different values) associated with same frameID key, so frameTypeHash was overwritten with last line as the value. I replaced the String object with another HashMap object as the value field, this helped in maintaining single key to different value mapping.
class DuplicateMap<K, V>
{
enum MapType
{
Hash,LinkedHash
}
int HashCode = 0;
Map<Key<K>,V> map = null;
DuplicateMap()
{
map = new HashMap<Key<K>,V>();
}
DuplicateMap( MapType maptype )
{
if ( maptype == MapType.Hash ) {
map = new HashMap<Key<K>,V>();
}
else if ( maptype == MapType.LinkedHash ) {
map = new LinkedHashMap<Key<K>,V>();
}
else
map = new HashMap<Key<K>,V>();
}
V put( K key, V value )
{
return map.put( new Key<K>( key , HashCode++ ), value );
}
void putAll( Map<K, V> map1 )
{
Map<Key<K>,V> map2 = new LinkedHashMap<Key<K>,V>();
for ( Entry<K, V> entry : map1.entrySet() ) {
map2.put( new Key<K>( entry.getKey() , HashCode++ ), entry.getValue());
}
map.putAll(map2);
}
Set<Entry<K, V>> entrySet()
{
Set<Entry<K, V>> entry = new LinkedHashSet<Map.Entry<K,V>>();
for ( final Entry<Key<K>, V> entry1 : map.entrySet() ) {
entry.add( new Entry<K, V>(){
private K Key = entry1.getKey().Key();
private V Value = entry1.getValue();
#Override
public K getKey() {
return Key;
}
#Override
public V getValue() {
return Value;
}
#Override
public V setValue(V value) {
return null;
}});
}
return entry;
}
#Override
public String toString() {
StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder();
builder.append("{");
boolean FirstIteration = true;
for ( Entry<K, V> entry : entrySet() ) {
builder.append( ( (FirstIteration)? "" : "," ) + ((entry.getKey()==null) ? null :entry.getKey().toString() ) + "=" + ((entry.getValue()==null) ? null :entry.getValue().toString() ) );
FirstIteration = false;
}
builder.append("}");
return builder.toString();
}
class Key<K1>
{
K1 Key;
int HashCode;
public Key(K1 key, int hashCode) {
super();
Key = key;
HashCode = hashCode;
}
public K1 Key() {
return Key;
}
#Override
public String toString() {
return Key.toString() ;
}
#Override
public int hashCode() {
return HashCode;
}
}
1, Map<String, List<String>> map = new HashMap<>();
this verbose solution has multiple drawbacks and is prone to errors. It
implies that we need to instantiate a Collection for every value, check for
its presence before adding or removing a value, delete it manually when no
values are left, etcetera.
2, org.apache.commons.collections4.MultiMap interface
3, com.google.common.collect.Multimap interface
java-map-duplicate-keys
what about such a MultiMap impl?
public class MultiMap<K, V> extends HashMap<K, Set<V>> {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
private Map<K, Set<V>> innerMap = new HashMap<>();
public Set<V> put(K key, V value) {
Set<V> valuesOld = this.innerMap.get(key);
HashSet<V> valuesNewTotal = new HashSet<>();
if (valuesOld != null) {
valuesNewTotal.addAll(valuesOld);
}
valuesNewTotal.add(value);
this.innerMap.put(key, valuesNewTotal);
return valuesOld;
}
public void putAll(K key, Set<V> values) {
for (V value : values) {
put(key, value);
}
}
#Override
public Set<V> put(K key, Set<V> value) {
Set<V> valuesOld = this.innerMap.get(key);
putAll(key, value);
return valuesOld;
}
#Override
public void putAll(Map<? extends K, ? extends Set<V>> mapOfValues) {
for (Map.Entry<? extends K, ? extends Set<V>> valueEntry : mapOfValues.entrySet()) {
K key = valueEntry.getKey();
Set<V> value = valueEntry.getValue();
putAll(key, value);
}
}
#Override
public Set<V> putIfAbsent(K key, Set<V> value) {
Set<V> valueOld = this.innerMap.get(key);
if (valueOld == null) {
putAll(key, value);
}
return valueOld;
}
#Override
public Set<V> get(Object key) {
return this.innerMap.get(key);
}
#Override
etc. etc. override all public methods size(), clear() .....
}
Could you also explain the context for which you are trying to implement a map with duplicate keys? I am sure there could be a better solution. Maps are intended to keep unique keys for good reason. Though if you really wanted to do it; you can always extend the class write a simple custom map class which has a collision mitigation function and would enable you to keep multiple entries with same keys.
Note: You must implement collision mitigation function such that, colliding keys are converted to unique set "always". Something simple like, appending key with object hashcode or something?
just to be complete, Apache Commons Collections also has a MultiMap. The downside of course is that Apache Commons does not use Generics.
With a bit hack you can use HashSet with duplicate keys. WARNING: this is heavily HashSet implementation dependant.
class MultiKeyPair {
Object key;
Object value;
public MultiKeyPair(Object key, Object value) {
this.key = key;
this.value = value;
}
#Override
public int hashCode() {
return key.hashCode();
}
}
class MultiKeyList extends MultiKeyPair {
ArrayList<MultiKeyPair> list = new ArrayList<MultiKeyPair>();
public MultiKeyList(Object key) {
super(key, null);
}
#Override
public boolean equals(Object obj) {
list.add((MultiKeyPair) obj);
return false;
}
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
HashSet<MultiKeyPair> set = new HashSet<MultiKeyPair>();
set.add(new MultiKeyPair("A","a1"));
set.add(new MultiKeyPair("A","a2"));
set.add(new MultiKeyPair("B","b1"));
set.add(new MultiKeyPair("A","a3"));
MultiKeyList o = new MultiKeyList("A");
set.contains(o);
for (MultiKeyPair pair : o.list) {
System.out.println(pair.value);
}
}
If there are duplicate keys then a key may correspond to more than one value. The obvious solution is to map the key to a list of these values.
For example in Python:
map = dict()
map["driver"] = list()
map["driver"].append("john")
map["driver"].append("mike")
print map["driver"] # It shows john and mike
print map["driver"][0] # It shows john
print map["driver"][1] # It shows mike
I used this:
java.util.List<java.util.Map.Entry<String,Integer>> pairList= new java.util.ArrayList<>();
Just use simple Set with Pair. This Set will exclude pairs with the same key-value. Also you can iterate it.
val set = hashSetOf<Pair<String, String>>()
set.add(Pair("1", "a"))
set.add(Pair("1", "b"))
set.add(Pair("1", "b")) // Duplicate
set.add(Pair("2", "a"))
set.add(Pair("2", "b"))
set.forEach { pair -> println(pair) }
result: (1, a),(2, b),(1, b),(2, a)