Related
we have a frontend application that that uses Swing. We use Spring framework, but currently it is used just to autowire few beans...
What are reasonable next steps to use Spring more often?
Is it worth for non web application?
What would be advantages and disadvantages?
The advantages of using Spring (or any other dependency-injection) framework, is that you get a (hopefully) loosely coupled system, i.e you classes does not create instances of their collaborators, so you can easily change the implementation.
This is widely known as the Inversion-of-control principle (IoC, also the I in SOLID), and this is a good principle to follow. This means that spring is not limited to web applications, but can be used in any application that want to use an IoC-container (which is basically what spring-core is).
Disadvantages:
This really depends on how you look at things. There is more code (you have to define a entry-point for the injected collaborators), but that also makes the code more testable (the entry-points are seams which you can use to inject mocks and stubs in testing).
Also, you can't look at the code and immediately see which implementation of the collaborators that are used. But that also makes for good code, since you depend on interfaces, not implementations.
You get more config: either in an xml-file (old-style spring), or with annotations. Up until recently you had to rely on non-standard spring annotations to inject (#Autowired) resources, but now you can use the standard java dependency injection annotations, which means that you can switch out spring as your IoC-container without changing your code.
There are probably alot more advantages and disadvantages to using spring in your application, but this should get you started on deciding if using Dependency Inversion is a good thing for your application
More to the point of your question about Swing and Spring. In an application I have been working on we have been using spring to wire up the whole application. The different dialogs get their logic injected (no application logic should (in my opinion) be located together with gui logic). We are using JPA/hibernate as the database-layer, so we use spring spring to create and inject the entitymanager to our DAOs, and set up transactional settings.
I've written swing UI's that are backed by spring.
cons
the startup can be slower but you have to have a large app for that to happen.
and a splashscreen is a good idea in those situations.
its easy to "overbean" or over-zealously make everything a bean, which gets messy.
pros
spring works fine behind a GUI.
it provides a lot of services you can use
the obvious dependency injection and decoupling
a global event system, simpifying some of your own event listeners, for events that will only ever be fired by one source
resource accessing
database access is eays in 2 tier apps
rpc for 3 tier apps is easy
There are other services the spring application context provides, but that I haven't used.
If you go this direction, also look into the java-based configuration for spring, which is new in 3.0. I find that helpful as well, as it makes my spring configuration type-safe.
One disadvantage of using Spring in a Swing application is that Spring DI will make startup slower.
well one would be , if you ever decide to migrate to a web app , all you need ( well almost) to change would be the views. That's the beauty of MVC applications.
I'm currently rebuilding an existing PHP application using Java. I therefore have an existing frontend GUI and an existing database schema that I'm working with.
Here is the technology stack I'm working towards:
jQuery, client-side
Wicket, front-end
Spring, ???
Hibernate, ORM
MySQL, database
Before reading about Spring in both Wicket In Action and the Hibernate documentation, I envisioned wiring the two together through my own business logic. I have experience with JBoss Seam, but am told that Spring is hardly comparable (although the documentation suggests otherwise, IMO). Short of adding a book about Spring to my reading list (I haven't found an appropriate one with good reviews yet), I'm at a loss.
What benefit(s) will Spring provide in this technology stack?
Subjective & optional follow up question: what reference material (book, website, etc) will get me started with the portion of Spring 3 I may utilize?
First, you can make your web application without Spring. But Spring will greatly facilitate things. Spring framework is a lightweight, non-invasive. Spring is like a kind of conductor. Among other things Spring helps you in:
To keep your objects loosely coupled. This will make your application more flexible and open to future changes
Powerful support for transactions through the AOP (Aspect Oriented Programming).
Object-relational mapping (ORM) integration module. Spring doesn’t attempt to implement its own ORM solution, but does provide hooks into several popular ORM frameworks, including Hibernate, Java Persistence API, Java Data Objects, and iBATIS SQL Maps. Spring’s Transaction management supports each of these ORM frameworks as well as JDBC.
The Spring MVC framework. Even though Spring integrates with several popular MVC frameworks, it also comes with its own very capable MVC framework that promotes Spring’s loosely coupled techniques in the web layer of an application.
A good book about Spring: Pro Spring
Spring, as noted in this review is non-invasive. It just wires your application components. And provides useful classes that make using other frameworks easier (JMS, JPA, etc). Spring doesn't force you to use its classes or interfaces anywhere.
What it handles is the creation of your components (objects), so that you can refer to a class' dependencies, without instantiating them. I.e. you say what your class needs, not how it is obtaining it. This makes the application very flexible.
That's in short - for more, read the linked article. It's not about the latest version, but that doesn't matter.
In addition to dependency injection, Spring offers features like declarative transaction management, simple integration with ORM, aspect-oriented programming support and many other nice things.
For documentation see Spring reference: http://static.springsource.org/spring/docs/3.0.x/spring-framework-reference/html
#Dolph, in the simplest term, think of Spring as your application framework at the highest degree. This "framework" provides several "component buckets" where you can easily plug in different types of implementations. For example, for ORM, you may choose to use Hibernate over JPA or TopLink, for front end, you may choose Wicket over Struts or SpringMVC, and so forth.
The whole beauty of this (besides all the goodies stated in other posts) is it allows you easily swap out any of these implementations easily in the future. So, you can essentially rip out Hibernate one day and replace with TopLink, and it will never cause ripple effect to other components.
Another beauty of using Spring is your code becomes less clutter and has loose dependencies with other classes because you spend less time creating new objects yourself, Spring handles that for you. That said, you will quickly realize how easy for you to test your code because your API to be tested becomes very atomic. This is one primary reason why folks get discouraged in writing testcases, because they quickly realize that in order for them to test one API, they have to construct whole lot of things just to test that. Because of that, the whole process is brittle, imagine if you change that API, you need to reconstruct everything before testing it again.
Pro Spring book is good, mentioned by #JLBarros. I like Spring in Action very much. It is very very easy to read when I first got started with Spring. This is probably one reference book that I read from skin to skin.
This question already has an answer here:
Difference between Request MVC and Component MVC [closed]
(1 answer)
Closed 6 years ago.
I haved used Struts framework in all my past applications and for the new application,my client has requested to use either Spring MVC or JSF? I am not familiar with these two frameworks but our timelines are strict. So, I am not sure which framework I will choose to build the application.
Can anyone please suggest me which framework will be easy to learn in quick time?
Thanks
Of course, it's going to be different for everyone, but I'd suggest Spring MVC, as it's a request-based framework like Struts. Of course, you'll want to learn about core Spring stuff like Inversion of Control / Dependency Injection (but I'd consider that a plus...) and whatever you're going to use for database access (just JDBC? Hibernate? iBatis? etc.).
JSF is component-based, which is a bit different paradigm from request-based frameworks. If you do plan to go the JSF route, I'd suggest looking at Seam from JBoss. It's more of a front-to-back framework that uses JSF as the web/presentation end and EJB as the backend. And pretty much all the people who've used it claim it makes JSF and EJB more usable than they are by themselves.
Good luck on whichever technology you choose, though. (Sounds like you'll need it - strict timelines and a client that's prescribing web frameworks?)
I'd suggest SpringMVC, because of the timeframe:
you need something with less steep learning curve. SpringMVC is more like Struts than JSF
in order to use the power of JSF you need to get familiar with many "tricks", while SpringMVC is more or less straightforward
I'd suggest JSF + Primefaces component library. I am using this combination to build most of our projects. As I remember, I spent one week to learn the technology and finished my first project in one month. The development time at least 30% faster than Struts.
SpringMVC is not a bad technology and it's quite popular.
Really depends on which one your like the most.
JSF is just the view layer of the MVC and wil need to be used with other technologies like Spring/Hibernate or EJB for a full MVC.
I have been using the Spring MVC for about 1 months now, whilst it's probably not the latyest version of SpringMVC I've found it a little annoying that we have so much XML to deal with. All the managed beans and DAO has XML config to it. Also everything seems to have to go thorugh a method called onSubmit().
JSF with something like EJB is far simplier in my opinion... Everything can be done using Annotations so simply use #ManagedBean=theBean in your backing bean and in your JSF put {thebean.param} and you have access to the backing bean's data. Also you can use the Session beans of your EJB as the backing beans for JSF then have direct acces to the DAO (Model layer) Entity bean. Again simply by using the #Entity annotation and the EntityManager class
Spring MVC is a web framework inside the Spring framework. It does provide features as those in JSF 2.0:
ajax-support
validation
dependency-injection etc
Yet, you can use Spring (not Spring MVC) together with JSF 2.0, with spring providing the dependency-injection, aop, transaction management mechanisms, and JSF providing the web layer.
Of course, you'll want to learn about core Spring stuff like Inversion of Control / Dependency Injection (but I'd consider that a plus...)
JSF is indeed based on IoC, and much simpler than the Spring learning curve.
We currently have a web application loading a Spring application context which instantiates a stack of business objects, DAO objects and Hibernate. We would like to share this stack with another web application, to avoid having multiple instances of the same objects.
We have looked into several approaches; exposing the objects using JMX or JNDI, or using EJB3.
The different approaches all have their issues, and we are looking for a lightweight method.
Any suggestions on how to solve this?
Edit: I have received comments requesting me to elaborate a bit, so here goes:
The main problem we want to solve is that we want to have only one instance of Hibernate. This is due to problems with invalidation of Hibernate's 2nd level cache when running several client applications working with the same datasource. Also, the business/DAO/Hibernate stack is growing rather large, so not duplicating it just makes more sense.
First, we tried to look at how the business layer alone could be exposed to other web apps, and Spring offers JMX wrapping at the price of a tiny amount of XML. However, we were unable to bind the JMX entities to the JNDI tree, so we couldn't lookup the objects from the web apps.
Then we tried binding the business layer directly to JNDI. Although Spring didn't offer any method for this, using JNDITemplate to bind them was also trivial. But this led to several new problems: 1) Security manager denies access to RMI classloader, so the client failed once we tried to invoke methods on the JNDI resource. 2) Once the security issues were resolved, JBoss threw IllegalArgumentException: object is not an instance of declaring class. A bit of reading reveals that we need stub implementations for the JNDI resources, but this seems like a lot of hassle (perhaps Spring can help us?)
We haven't looked too much into EJB yet, but after the first two tries I'm wondering if what we're trying to achieve is at all possible.
To sum up what we're trying to achieve: One JBoss instance, several web apps utilizing one stack of business objects on top of DAO layer and Hibernate.
Best regards,
Nils
Are the web applications deployed on the same server?
I can't speak for Spring, but it is straightforward to move your business logic in to the EJB tier using Session Beans.
The application organization is straight forward. The Logic goes in to Session Beans, and these Session Beans are bundled within a single jar as an Java EE artifact with a ejb-jar.xml file (in EJB3, this will likely be practically empty).
Then bundle you Entity classes in to a seperate jar file.
Next, you will build each web app in to their own WAR file.
Finally, all of the jars and the wars are bundled in to a Java EE EAR, with the associated application.xml file (again, this will likely be quite minimal, simply enumerating the jars in the EAR).
This EAR is deployed wholesale to the app server.
Each WAR is effectively independent -- their own sessions, there own context paths, etc. But they share the common EJB back end, so you have only a single 2nd level cache.
You also use local references and calling semantic to talk to the EJBs since they're in the same server. No need for remote calls here.
I think this solves quite well the issue you're having, and its is quite straightforward in Java EE 5 with EJB 3.
Also, you can still use Spring for much of your work, as I understand, but I'm not a Spring person so I can not speak to the details.
What about spring parentContext?
Check out this article:
http://springtips.blogspot.com/2007/06/using-shared-parent-application-context.html
Terracotta might be a good fit here (disclosure: I am a developer for Terracotta). Terracotta transparently clusters Java objects at the JVM level, and integrates with both Spring and Hibernate. It is free and open source.
As you said, the problem of more than one client web app using an L2 cache is keeping those caches in synch. With Terracotta you can cluster a single Hibernate L2 cache. Each client node works with it's copy of that clustered cache, and Terracotta keeps it in synch. This link explains more.
As for your business objects, you can use Terracotta's Spring integration to cluster your beans - each web app can share clustered bean instances, and Terracotta keeps the clustered state in synch transparently.
Actually, if you want a lightweight solution and don't need transactions or clustering just use Spring support for RMI. It allows to expose Spring beans remotely using simple annotations in the latest versions. See http://static.springframework.org/spring/docs/2.0.x/reference/remoting.html.
You should take a look at the Terracotta Reference Web Application - Examinator. It has most of the components you are looking for - it's got Hibernate, JPA, and Spring with a MySQL backend.
It's been pre-tuned to scale up to 16 nodes, 20k concurrent users.
Check it out here: http://reference.terracotta.org/examinator
Thank you for your answers so far. We're still not quite there, but we have tried a few things now and see things more clearly. Here's a short update:
The solution which appears to be the most viable is EJB. However, this will require some amount of changes in our code, so we're not going to fully implement that solution right now. I'm almost surprised that we haven't been able to find some Spring feature to help us out here.
We have also tried the JNDI route, which ends with the need for stubs for all shared interfaces. This feels like a lot of hassle, considering that everything is on the same server anyway.
Yesterday, we had a small break through with JMX. Although JMX is definately not meant for this kind of use, we have proven that it can be done - with no code changes and a minimal amount of XML (a big Thank You to Spring for MBeanExporter and MBeanProxyFactoryBean). The major drawbacks to this method are performance and the fact that our domain classes must be shared through JBoss' server/lib folder. I.e., we have to remove some dependencies from our WARs and move them to server/lib, else we get ClassCastException when the business layer returns objects from our own domain model. I fully understand why this happens, but it is not ideal for what we're trying to achieve.
I thought it was time for a little update, because what appears to be the best solution will take some time to implement. I'll post our findings here once we've done that job.
Spring does have an integration point that might be of interest to you: EJB 3 injection nterceptor. This enables you to access spring beans from EJBs.
I'm not really sure what you are trying to solve; at the end of the day each jvm will either have replicated instances of the objects, or stubs representing objects existing on another (logical) server.
You could, setup a third 'business logic' server that has a remote api which your two web apps could call. The typical solution is to use EJB, but I think spring has remoting options built into its stack.
The other option is to use some form of shared cache architecture... which will synchronize object changes between the servers, but you still have two sets of instances.
Take a look at JBossCache. It allows you to easily share/replicate maps of data between mulitple JVM instances (same box or different). It is easy to use and has lots of wire level protocol options (TCP, UDP Multicast, etc.).
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm currently trying to get into the Java EE development with the Spring framework. As I'm new to Spring, it is hard to imaging how a good running project should start off.
Do you have any best practices, tipps or major DO NOTs for a starter? How did you start with Spring - big project or small tutorial-like applications? Which technology did you use right away: AOP, complex Hibernate...
Small tip - I've found it helpful to modularize and clearly label my Spring xml context files based on application concern. Here's an example for a web app I worked on:
MyProject / src / main / resources / spring /
datasource.xml - My single data source bean.
persistence.xml - My DAOs/Repositories. Depends on datasource.xml beans.
services.xml - Service layer implementations. These are usually the beans to which I apply transactionality using AOP. Depends on persistence.xml beans.
controllers.xml - My Spring MVC controllers. Depends on services.xml beans.
views.xml - My view implementations.
This list is neither perfect nor exhaustive, but I hope it illustrates the point. Choose whatever naming strategy and granularity works best for you.
In my (limited) experience, I've seen this approach yeild the following benefits:
Clearer architecture
Clearly named context files gives those unfamiliar with your project structure a reasonable
place to start looking for bean definitions. Can make detecting circular/unwanted dependencies a little easier.
Helps domain design
If you want to add a bean definition, but it doesn't fit well in any of your context files, perhaps there's a new concept or concern emerging? Examples:
Suppose you want to make your Service layer transactional with AOP. Do you add those bean definitions to services.xml, or put them in their own transactionPolicy.xml? Talk it over with your team. Should your transaction policy be pluggable?
Add Acegi/Spring Security beans to your controllers.xml file, or create a security.xml context file? Do you have different security requirements for different deployments/environments?
Integration testing
You can wire up a subset of your application for integration testing (ex: given the above files, to test the database you need to create only datasource.xml and persistence.xml beans).
Specifically, you can annotate an integration test class as such:
#ContextConfiguration(locations = { "/spring/datasource.xml" , "/spring/persistence.xml" })
Works well with Spring IDE's Beans Graph
Having lots of focused and well-named context files makes it easy to create custom BeansConfigSets to visualize the layers of your app using Spring IDE's Beans Graph. I've used this before to give new team members a high-level overview of our application's organization.
Focus first on the heart of Spring: Dependency Injection. Once you see all the ways that DI can be used, then start thinking about the more interesting pieces like AOP, Remoting, JDBC Templates etc. So my best bit of advice is let your use of Spring grow out from the core.
Best practice? If you're using the standard XML config, manage the size of individual files and comment them judiciously. You may think that you and others will perfectly understand your bean definitions, but in practice they're somewhat harder to come back to than plain old java code.
Good luck!
First of all Spring is about modularity and works best if one focuses on writing small components that do one thing and do it well.
If you follow best practices in general like:
Defining an interface rather than abstract classes
Making types immutable
Keep dependencies as few as possible for a single class.
Each class should do one thing and do it well. Big monolithic classes suck, they are hard to test and hard to use.
If your components are small and follow the dogmas above they should be easy to wire up and play with other stuff. The above points are naturally also true of the Spring framework itself.
PS
Dont listen to the points above, they are talking about how to do whatever. Its more important to learn how to think rather than how to do something. Humans can think, repeating something is not clever, thinking is.
I actually quite liked Spring.. It was a fresh breeze of air in your average J2EE Java Beans..
I recommend implementing the example Spring provides:
http://static.springframework.org/docs/Spring-MVC-step-by-step/
Also, I decided to go full monty and added Hibernate to my Spring application ;), because Spring provides excellent support for Hibernate... :)
I do have a DON'T however, which I learned the hard way (product in production)... If you only implement the Controller interface, and return a ModelAndView object with some data as provided with the interface, Spring does garbadge collect those resources, for tries to cache those data. So be careful to put large data in those ModelAndView objects, because they will hog up your server memory for as long as the server is in the air as soon as that page has been viewed...
Start here - I actually think it's among the best Software Dev books that I've read.
Expert Spring MVC And Web Flow
Learn the new Annotation-based configuration for MVC classes. This is part of Spring 2.5. Using Annotation-based classes is going to make writing Unit tests a heck of a lot easier. Also being able to cut down on the amount of XML is a good thing.
Oh yeah Unit Tests - if you're using Spring, you BETTER be Unit Testing. :) Write Unit tests for all of your Web and Service Layer classes.
Read up on Domain Driven Design. The fact that you can use Domain Object classes at all levels of a Spring Application means you're going to have a VERY powerful Domain Model. Leverage it.
However, when using your Domain Object classes for form population, you will want to take heed of the recent security concerns around the Spring Framework. A discussion on the Server Side reveals the way to close the hole in the comments.
A good way to get started is to concentrate on the "Springframework". The Spring portfolio has grown to a big pile of projects around various aspects of Enterprise Software. Stick to the core at the beginning and try to grasp the concepts. Download the latest binaries and check out Spring's petclinic example once you are familiar with the core. It gives quite a good overview of the various projects SpringSource has to offer.
Although the documentation is very good, I'd recommend a book after you grasp the concepts of the core. What I've found problematic with the documentation, is that it's not in depth and can't give you all the details you need.
"...Which technology did you use right away: AOP, complex Hibernate..." - I'd say a better question would be to ask what people did not use right away. I'd add the examples you cite to that list.
Spring MVC and JDBC template would be my starting recommendations. You can go a very long way just with those.
My recommendation would be to follow the Spring architectural recommendations faithfully. Use their layering ideas. Make sure that your web layer is completely detachable from the rest. You do this by letting the web tier interact with the back end only through the service layer.
If you want to reuse that service layer, a good recommendation is to expose it using Spring "contract first" web services. If you start with the XML messages that you pass back and forth, your client and server can be completely decoupled.
The IDE with the best Spring support is IntelliJ. It's worth spending a few bucks.
Whilst its been years since I have used spring, and I can't say I am a fan of it, I know that the App Fuse tool (https://java.net/projects/appfuse/) has been helpful to help people bootstrap in terms of generating all the artifacts you need to get going.
Spring is also very much about unit testing and therefore testability of your classes. That basically means thinking about modularization, separation of concerns, referencing a class through interfaces etc.
If you're just looking to dabble in it a bit and see if you like it, I recommend starting with the DAO layer, using Spring's JDBC and/or Hibernate support. This will expose you to a lot of the core concepts, but do so in a way that is easy to isolate from the rest of your app. This is the route I followed, and it was good warm-up before getting into building a full application with Spring.
With the release of Spring 2.5 and 3.0, I think one of the most important best practices to take advantage of now are the Spring annotations. Annotations for Controllers, Services, and Repositories can save you a ton of time, allow you to focus on the business logic of your app, and can potentially all you to make all of your object plain old Java objects (POJOs).