I have the following java model class in App Engine:
public class Xyz ... {
#Persistent
private Set<Long> uvw;
}
When saving an object Xyz with an empty set uvw in Java, I get a "null" field (as listed in the appengine datastore viewer).
When I try to load the same object in Python (through remote_api), as defined by the following python model class:
class Xyz(db.Model):
uvw = db.ListProperty(int)
I get a "BadValueError: Property uvw is required".
When saving another object of the same class in Python with an empty uvw list, the Datastore viewer prints a "missing" field.
Apparently empty lists storage handling differs between Java and Python and lead to "incompatible" objects.
Thus my question: Is there a way to, either:
force Java to store an empty list as a "missing" field,
force Python to gracefully accept a "null" list as an empty list when loading the object?
Or any other suggestion on how to handle empty list field in both languages.
Thanks for your answers!
It should work if you assign a default value to your Python property:
uvw = db.ListProperty(int, default=[])
I use the low-level java api, so perhaps what I am doing would be different. But before I save a collection-type data structure to the datastore, I convert it into something that the datastore naturally handles. This would include mainly Strings and ByteArrays.
It sounds like java app engine is interpreting the empty set as a null value. And python is not reading this null value correctly. You might try saving an empty set as the String value "empty set". And then have python check to see if the datastore holds that string value. If it does, it could allocate a new empty set, if not, it could read the property as a set.
The Java Set behavior is because Java's Collections are reference types, which default to being null.
To actually create an empty Set, declare it like this:
#Persistent
private Set<Long> uvw = new HashSet<Long>();
or using some other implementation of Set on the right side. HashSet is the most commonly used Set type, though. Other interesting set types are the two thread-safe Sets CopyOnWriteArraySet and ConcurrentSkipListSet; also the Ordered Set type LinkedHashSet and the Sorted Set type TreeSet.
It may work to you
uvw = db.ListProperty(int, default=[])
Its the most comment way to short it out...
Related
I am implementing a graph data structure in java. In this structure, vertices are represented as Vertex objects containing a private final String value field.
One of my methods vertices() returns the set of values of all vertices. In particular, a client who gets this set cannot get a particular value from the set and set it to another string (because of the final modifier). How should I document this behavior in the javadocs of vertices()?
Unfortunately the Java standard library doesn't have an interface for immutable collections.
I think all you can do is to wrap the Set you return in an UnmodifiableSet via Collections.unmodifiableSet and mention in the Javadoc that the Set being returned is immutable.
I have a Java Object, Record . It represents a single record as a result of SQL execution. Can CQEngine index collection of Record ?
My class is of the form
public class Record {
private List<String> columnNames;
private List<Object> values;
... Other getters
}
I have looked through some examples, but I have no luck there.
I want to index only specific column(s) with its name and corresponding value. Can this be achived using cqengine or is there any other alternatives to achieve the same.
Thanks.
That seems to be a strange way to model data, but you can use CQEngine with that model if you wish.
(First off, CQEngine will have no use for your column names so you can remove that field.)
To do this, you will need to define a CQEngine virtual attribute for each of the indexes in your list of values.
Each attribute will need to be declared with the data type which will be stored in that column/index, and will need to be able to cast the object at that index in your list of values, to the appropriate data type (String, Double, Integer etc.).
So let's say your Record has a column called 'price', which is of type Double, and is stored at index 5 in the list of values. You could define an attribute which reads it as follows:
public static final Attribute<Record, Double> PRICE =
attribute("PRICE", record -> ((Double) record.values.get(5));
If this sounds complicated, it's because that way of modelling data makes things a bit complicated :) It's usually easier to work with a data model which leverages the Java type system (which your model does not). As such, you will need to keep track of the data types etc. of each field programmatically yourself.
CQEngine itself will work fine with that model though, because at the end of the day CQEngine attributes don't need to read fields, the attributes are just functions which are programmed to fetch values.
There's a bunch of stuff not covered above. For example can your values be null? (if so, you should use the nullable variety of attributes as discussed in the CQEngine docs. Or, might each of your Record objects have different sets of columns? (if so, you can create attributes on-the-fly when you encounter a new column, but you should probably cache the attributes you have created somewhere).
Hope that helps,
Niall (CQEngine author)
I'm using Jersey and want a set that, when not added as a query param, defaults to a set containing more than one object.
I basically want this:
#DefaultValue("test1", "test2")
#QueryParam("test")
private Set<MyEnum> test;
to return a set containing the enums "test1" and "test2".
I'm having no problem getting a single default value to work but I would like multiple. The docs are a bit cryptical, is it possible?
According to this source from stackoverflow and the official documentation you can only do this by manually checking if the object is null then set the default value
I'm trying to get a value from the databae.
My Database query:
String GroupID1="select idCompanies from companies where Company_Name='ACME';";
here I'm calling to a javabeans which give back an ArrayLIst with one element
ArrayList<?> IdGroup1=oper.getList(GroupID1);
then, I print the result:
System.out.println(IdGroup1);
The query works fine, however I'm getting as a result:
[javabeans.ListOneElement#609f6e68]
Instead of the real value. How can I convert the java object to the real value?
you are printing the ArrayList object IdGroup1,You need to iterate to get the alues
This code will retrieve the first (and only) item from the list:
System.out.println(IdGroup1.get(0).toString());
Adding the following will prevent a nullPointerException:
if (!IdGroup1.isEmpty())
System.out.println(IdGroup1.get(0).toString());
-Added .toString() to get the value of the object
Consider what type of Object oper.getList(GroupID1) will return.
You need to accommodate for whatever object that is and then convert it to String.
You need to:
Unpackage your list (that is a list contains, and is expected by java to possibly contain multiple objects, so it doesn't automatically 'unpack' it for you if you have a list of 1 object)
Extract your string. Here java might cleverly convert a number (int, float, etc. ) to a string for you.
For part two, look at what you expect the object to be by finding the JavaDocs for whatever package is handling your database queries. Then see how to extract your string.
It might be as simple as System.out.println(IdGroup1.get(0).toString());
Where get(0) unpackages the object from the list, and toString() extracts the string.
If you still get back javabeans.ListOneElement#41ccdc4d try other methods to extract your string....toValue() perhaps? It depends on the packages you're using.
I am developing a java application which needs a special component for dynamic attributes. The arguments are serialized (using JSON) and stored in a database and then deserialized at runtime. All attributes are displayed in a JTable with 3 columns (attribute name, attribute type and attribute value) and stored in a hashmap.
I have currently two problems to solve:
The hashmap can also store objects and the objects can be set to null. And if set to null i dont know which class they belong to. How could i store objects even if they are null and known which class they belong to? Do i need to wrap each object in a class that will holds the class of the stored object?
The objects are deserialized from json at runtime. The problem with this is that there are many different types of objects and i don't actually know all object types that will be stored in the hashmap. So i am looking for a way to dynamicly deserialize objects.. Is there such a way? Would i have to store the class of the object in the serialized json string?
Thanks!
Take a look to the Null Object Pattern. You can use an extra class to represent a Null instance of your type and still could contain information about itself.
There is something called a Class Token, Which is the use of Class objects as keys for heterogeneous containers. Take a look to Effective Java By Joshua Bloch, Item 29. I'm not sure how this approach could work for you since you may have many instances of the same type but I leave it as a reference.
First of all, can you motivate why you use JSON serialization for your attributes ?
This method is disadvantageous in many ways in my opinion, it can cause problems with database search and indexing, make database viewing painful and caus unnecessary code in your application. These problems can be not an issue, it depends how you want to use your attributes.
My solution for situation like these is simple table containing columns like:
id - int
attribute_name - varchar
And then add columns for each supported data type:
string_value - varchar
integer_value - int
date_value - date
... and any other types you want.
This design allow for supreme performance using simple and typesafe ORM mapping without any serialization or other boilerplate. It can store values of any type, you just set correct column for attribute type, leaving all other with null. You can simulate null value by using null in all data columns. Indexing and searching also becomes a piece of cake.