Can you specialize inherited Java annotations - java

I have an abstract superclass that has JPA annotations on it mapping some of its fields. The class itself has the #MappedSuperclass annotation.
Can I specialize/add or change just one element of an inherited annotation without re-specifying the entire annotation?

The only thing you can do with Annotations is to place an Annotation on an Annotation and have a library which understands this as a form of inheritance.
The problem is that if you re-specify the entire annotation, any library which expects MappedSuperclass will ignore it.

Related

Do I need #Transient annotation on un-mapped super-class attributes?

OK, here's the simple example:
I have an abstract super class defined thus:
abstract public class AbstractSuperEntity {
private char someFlag;
public void setSomeFlag(char flagValue) {
this.someFlag = flagValue;
}
public char getSomeFlag() {
return this.someFlag;
}
}
which all my #Entity classes inherit from. An example might be:
#Entity
#Table("SOME_ENTITY")
public class SomeEntity extends AbstractSuperEntity {
#Column(name="ID");
private Long id;
etc.
}
Does the someFlag attribute in AbstractSuperEntity need to have the #Transient?
I've tried it with and without, and it doesn't seem to make any difference. But I'm just scared I'm missing something.
EDIT Thanks for all the quick answers.
A colleague has also pointed me to the JPA Tutorial at JPalace.org, and in particular the page on ORM and JPA Concepts which has the following section:
Non-Entity Superclasses
Entities may also extend non-entity superclasses. These superclasses can be either abstract or concrete. The state of non-entity superclasses is always non-persistent. Thus, any state inherited from the non-entity superclass by an entity class is non-persistent.
Similarly to mapped superclasses, non-entity superclasses may not be used subject to queries. Mapping and relationship annotation present in a non-entity superclasses are ignored. Again, this is beacause there is no correponding database table to which the querying operations or relationships can be applied.
No, the #Transient annotation is not needed, as your AbstractSuperEntity is neither a MappedSuperClass, nor an Entity. You have to annotate it with one of those annotations if you want it to contain mapping information (that is inherited).
I'm going to disagree with Jukka and say that you don't need the annotation. It should be obvious from your configuration that the superclass isn't mapped by Hibernate, and that as far as Hibernate is concerned, your superclass doesn't even exist.
If you then go and start marking fields on the superclass as #Transient I would infer that the superclass as a whole is mapped by Hibernate but this particular field isn't. If its the only field on the superclass, I start to wonder why this class is mapped by Hibernate, go looking for the superclass mapping, get confused when I can't find it etc etc etc...
More broadly speaking, if I notice the presence of any JPA/Hibernate annotations I automatically assume that the class is mapped by your persistence provider, but at the end of the day, its your project and your decision as to what makes the code clearer.
If that property is globally not persistent, then adding the #Transient annotation will not hurt and will in fact make it explicitly transient for future readers of your code.

Play! Framework generate the CRUD from existing Entity

I have an existing Entity class that already inherits from another class, not model.
The existing entity class comes from libraries (jar), that means that I can not change them.
Can I still use the CRUD approach of Play! Framework?
how can i do it?
thank you
from http://docs.oracle.com/javaee/5/tutorial/doc/bnbqa.html#bnbqr
Non-Entity Superclasses
Entities may have non-entity superclasses, and these superclasses can
be either abstract or concrete. The state of non-entity superclasses
is non-persistent, and any state inherited from the non-entity
superclass by an entity class is non-persistent. Non-entity
superclasses may not be used in EntityManager or Query operations. Any
mapping or relationship annotations in non-entity superclasses are
ignored.
I believe the only way is too have you super class annotated with #MappedSuperClass

Is there anyway to annotate only required fields for JAXB

I'm working on to convert Hibernate objects to XML using JAXB. In our classes, we've around 50 fields from which I would need only 10 of them.
Basically, I'd defined XmlType#propOrder with 2 properties. JAXB complained that some public getters are not part of proporder.
I see that if I don't mark a property with either of XmlTransient/XmlElement, JAXB complains about it. Is there any way to skip writing 'XmlTransient' on every field?
You can use #XmlAccessorType(XmlAccessType.NONE) so that only the annotated fields/properties are marshalled to XML. JAXB does not require any annotations. Annotations are only required to override the default behaviour. What exceptions are you seeing?
For More Information
http://blog.bdoughan.com/2011/06/using-jaxbs-xmlaccessortype-to.html

Accessing annotations defined in the interface, in the class implementing it?

I'm working with java. I have an interface that has an annotated method in it. Is there a way to access that annotation in a class implementing that interface?
Thanks.
Edit: sorry, I shoudl've been clearer: I'm using reflection to access elements of Java, and I'm wondering how to access the annotations in a class implementing an interface (where the annotation is declared).
Sure. Reflection allows you to check for the presence of an annotation. There are methods at the class, method, paramter levels: reflection and annotations

Combine annotations in Java

How can I combine annotations in Java?
EDIT I was asking if I two annotations a and b, can I combine to a single annotations c?
If possible, how do I do that?
You cannot combine the annotations by e.g. annotating the annotations, unless the annotation consumer will process the meta-annotation tree explicitly. For example, Spring supports such feature for #Transactional, #Component and some other annotations (you may wish to have a look at SpringTransactionAnnotationParser#parseTransactionAnnotation()). Nice to have this feature in Java core, but alas...
However you can declare the common parent class that has a set of annotations you need and extend it. But this is not always applicable.
Assuming you want to have multiple annotations on a single element, you can just list them in sequence.
The Wikipedia page on Java annotations has quite a few useful examples, e.g.
#Entity // Declares this an entity bean
#Table(name = "people") // Maps the bean to SQL table "people"
class Person implements Serializable {
...
}

Categories

Resources