Develop Reference

Typecasting with a class that is protected

I am trying to override some class of vertx web project, since I have to change some of the features. So the tricky part comes here.
#Override
public void reroute(HttpMethod method, String path) {
int split = path.indexOf('?');
if (split == -1) {
split = path.indexOf('#');
}
if (split != -1) {
log.warn("Non path segment is not considered: " + path.substring(split));
// reroute is path based so we trim out the non url path parts
path = path.substring(0, split);
}
/*((HttpServerRequestWrapper) request).setMethod(method);
((HttpServerRequestWrapper) request).setPath(path);*/
((HttpServerRequestWrapper) request).setMethod(method);
((HttpServerRequestWrapper) request).setPath(path);
request.params().clear();
// we need to reset the normalized path
normalisedPath = null;
// we also need to reset any previous status
statusCode = -1;
// we need to reset any response headers
response().headers().clear();
// special header case cookies are parsed and cached
if (cookies != null) {
cookies.clear();
}
// reset the end handlers
if (headersEndHandlers != null) {
headersEndHandlers.clear();
}
if (bodyEndHandlers != null) {
bodyEndHandlers.clear();
}
failure = null;
restart();
}
This code throws me a compilation error saying:
'HttpServerRequestWrapper cannot be accessed from outside package'
I know for a fact that we can use reflection to create objects of a class that cannot be accessed. Can reflection be used in this case? How can I fix such an issue.
Any help will be much appreciated.

In java 8 and/or without modules it is possible to just place class like that in same package as original one to get access to all package-default classes.
Otherwise you need to use reflections like in other response, but I would add that it is good idea to cache that Class and Method instance, as using Class.forName and clazz.getDeclaredMethod each time will slowdown code.

What about getting the Class object and then calling the methods on your specific (uncasted) object?
I assume request is a class attribute of type HttpServerRequestWrapper. Then, this is what I suggest:
import java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException;
import java.lang.reflect.Method;
...
private final Method setMethod;
private final Method setPath;
public MyConstructor() {
Method tmp1 = null, tmp2 = null;
try {
final Class<?> clazz = Class.forName("io.vertx.ext.web.impl.HttpServerRequestWrapper");
tmp1 = clazz.getMethod("setMethod", HttpMethod.class);
tmp1.setAccessible(true);
tmp2 = clazz.getMethod("setPath", String.class);
tmp2.setAccessible(true);
} catch (ClassNotFoundException e) {
// do something
} catch (NoSuchMethodException e) {
// do something
} catch (SecurityException e) {
// do something
}
this.setMethod = tmp1;
this.setPath = tmp2;
}
...
#Override
public void reroute(HttpMethod method, String path) {
...
try {
this.setMethod.invoke(request, method);
this.setPath.invoke(request, path);
} catch (IllegalAccessException e) {
// do something
} catch (IllegalArgumentException e) {
// do something
} catch (InvocationTargetException e) {
// do something
}
...
}
EDIT: I updated this answer based on #GotoFinal's suggestion.

It looks like HttpServerRequestWrapper implements HttpServerRequest. So, you can change "HttpServerRequestWrapper" to "HttpServerRequest" in your code. But remember that by doing so, you'll only be able to call methods specified in the interface.
You can see those methods in https://vertx.io/docs/apidocs/io/vertx/rxjava/core/http/HttpServerRequest.html.

Alfresco action: create a folder with a name from the uploaded metadata

I want to run an action (with a rule) when a file enters the folder in my alfresco repository. The file needs to be moved to a new folder. The new folder will be named after the metadata property "subject" from the file I uploaded.
I am not able to figure out how to do this. Who got any tips?
(A repository webscript is also an option).
This is how I see it:
import java.util.List;
public class MoveExecuter extends ActionExecuterAbstractBase {
public static final String DESTINATION_FOLDER = "destination-folder";
private FileFolderService fileFolderService;
private NodeService nodeService;
#Override
protected void addParameterDefinitions(List<ParameterDefinition> paramList) {
paramList.add(
new ParameterDefinitionImpl(DESTINATION_FOLDER,
DataTypeDefinition.NODE_REF,
true,
getParamDisplayLabel(METADATA VALUE FROM FIELD SUBJECT FROM INCOMING FILE)));}
public void executeImpl(Action ruleAction, NodeRef actionedUponNodeRef) {
NodeRef destinationParent = (NodeRef)ruleAction.getParameterValue(DESTINATION_FOLDER);
// if the node exists
if (this.nodeService.exists(destinationParent) == true) {
try {
fileFolderService.move(incomingfile, destinationParent, null);
} catch (FileNotFoundException e) {
// Do nothing
}
if (this.nodeService.exists(destinationParent) == false) {
try {
nodeService.createNode(parentRef, assocTypeQName, assocQName, "metadata field subject");
fileFolderService.move(incomingfile, destinationParent, null);
} catch (FileNotFoundException e) {
// Do nothing
}
}
}
}

For such a simple action I'd just use a JavaScript instead of a java Action.
Install the JavaScript addon from googlecode or github (newer version)
And just write your Javascript code according the api and run it in runtime in the console to test your code.

Is it possible to create an URL pointing to an in-memory object?

I'm trying to extend my library for integrating Swing and JPA by making JPA config as automatic (and portable) as can be done, and it means programmatically adding <class> elements. (I know it can be done via Hibernate's AnnotationConfiguration or EclipseLInk's ServerSession, but - portability). I'd also like to avoid using Spring just for this single purpose.
I can create a persistence.xml on the fly, and fill it with <class> elements from specified packages (via the Reflections library). The problem starts when I try to feed this persistence.xml to a JPA provider. The only way I can think of is setting up a URLClassLoader, but I can't think of a way what wouldn't make me write the file to the disk somewhere first, for sole ability to obtain a valid URL. Setting up a socket for serving the file via an URL(localhost:xxxx) seems... I don't know, evil?
Does anyone have an idea how I could solve this problem? I know it sounds like a lot of work to avoid using one library, but I'd just like to know if it can be done.
EDIT (a try at being more clear):
Dynamically generated XML is kept in a String object. I don't know how to make it available to a persistence provider. Also, I want to avoid writing the file to disk.
For purpose of my problem, a persistence provider is just a class which scans the classpath for META-INF/persistence.xml. Some implementations can be made to accept dynamic creation of XML, but there is no common interface (especially for a crucial part of the file, the <class> tags).
My idea is to set up a custom ClassLoader - if you have any other I'd be grateful, I'm not set on this one.
The only easily extendable/configurable one I could find was a URLClassLoader. It works on URL objects, and I don't know if I can create one without actually writing XML to disk first.
That's how I'm setting things up, but it's working by writing the persistenceXmlFile = new File("META-INF/persistence.xml") to disk:
Thread.currentThread().setContextClassLoader(
new URLResourceClassLoader(
new URL[] { persistenceXmlFile.toURI().toURL() },
Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader()
)
);
URLResourceClassLoader is URLCLassLoader's subclass, which allows for looking up resources as well as classes, by overriding public Enumeration<URL> findResources(String name).

Maybe a bit late (after 4 years), but for others that are looking for a similar solution, you may be able to use the URL factory I created:
public class InMemoryURLFactory {
public static void main(String... args) throws Exception {
URL url = InMemoryURLFactory.getInstance().build("/this/is/a/test.txt", "This is a test!");
byte[] data = IOUtils.toByteArray(url.openConnection().getInputStream());
// Prints out: This is a test!
System.out.println(new String(data));
}
private final Map<URL, byte[]> contents = new WeakHashMap<>();
private final URLStreamHandler handler = new InMemoryStreamHandler();
private static InMemoryURLFactory instance = null;
public static synchronized InMemoryURLFactory getInstance() {
if(instance == null)
instance = new InMemoryURLFactory();
return instance;
}
private InMemoryURLFactory() {
}
public URL build(String path, String data) {
try {
return build(path, data.getBytes("UTF-8"));
} catch (UnsupportedEncodingException ex) {
throw new RuntimeException(ex);
}
}
public URL build(String path, byte[] data) {
try {
URL url = new URL("memory", "", -1, path, handler);
contents.put(url, data);
return url;
} catch (MalformedURLException ex) {
throw new RuntimeException(ex);
}
}
private class InMemoryStreamHandler extends URLStreamHandler {
#Override
protected URLConnection openConnection(URL u) throws IOException {
if(!u.getProtocol().equals("memory")) {
throw new IOException("Cannot handle protocol: " + u.getProtocol());
}
return new URLConnection(u) {
private byte[] data = null;
#Override
public void connect() throws IOException {
initDataIfNeeded();
checkDataAvailability();
// Protected field from superclass
connected = true;
}
#Override
public long getContentLengthLong() {
initDataIfNeeded();
if(data == null)
return 0;
return data.length;
}
#Override
public InputStream getInputStream() throws IOException {
initDataIfNeeded();
checkDataAvailability();
return new ByteArrayInputStream(data);
}
private void initDataIfNeeded() {
if(data == null)
data = contents.get(u);
}
private void checkDataAvailability() throws IOException {
if(data == null)
throw new IOException("In-memory data cannot be found for: " + u.getPath());
}
};
}
}
}

We can use the Jimfs google library for that.
First, we need to add the maven dependency to our project:
<dependency>
<groupId>com.google.jimfs</groupId>
<artifactId>jimfs</artifactId>
<version>1.2</version>
</dependency>
After that, we need to configure our filesystem behavior, and write our String content to the in-memory file, like this:
public static final String INPUT =
"\n"
+ "<?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"UTF-8\"?>\n"
+ "<note>\n"
+ " <to>Tove</to>\n"
+ " <from>Jani</from>\n"
+ " <heading>Reminder</heading>\n"
+ " <body>Don't forget me this weekend!</body>\n"
+ "</note>";
#Test
void usingJIMFS() throws IOException {
try (var fs = Jimfs.newFileSystem(Configuration.unix())) {
var path = fs.getPath(UUID.randomUUID().toString());
Files.writeString(path, INPUT);
var url = path.toUri().toURL();
assertThat(url.getProtocol()).isEqualTo("jimfs");
assertThat(Resources.asCharSource(url, UTF_8).read()).isEqualTo(INPUT);
}
}
We can find more examples in the official repository.
If we look inside the jimfs source code we will find the implementation is similar to #NSV answer.

Read an AMF object with flex socket

I'm currently trying to communicate between java and flex by using sockets and AMF serialized objects.
On the java side I use Amf3Input and Amf3Output from BlazeDS (flex-messaging-common.jar and flex-messaging-core.jar).
The connection is correctly established, and if i try to send object from flex to java, i can easily read objects :
FLEX side :
protected function button2_clickHandler(event:MouseEvent):void
{
var tmp:FlexAck = new FlexAck;
tmp.id="123456789123456789123456789";
tmp.name="A";
tmp.source="Aaaaaa";
tmp.ackGroup=false;
s.writeObject(tmp);
s.flush();
}
JAVA side :
ServerSocket servSoc = new ServerSocket(8888);
Socket s = servSoc.accept();
Amf3Output amf3Output = new Amf3Output(SerializationContext.getSerializationContext());
amf3Output.setOutputStream(s.getOutputStream());
Amf3Input amf3Input = new Amf3Input(SerializationContext.getSerializationContext());
amf3Input.setInputStream(s.getInputStream());
while(true)
{
try
{
Object obj = amf3Input.readObject();
if(obj!=null){
if (obj instanceof AckOrder){
System.out.println(((AckOrder)obj).getId());
}
}
}
catch (Exception e)
{
e.printStackTrace();
break;
}
}
amf3Output.close();
amf3Input.close();
servSoc.close();
In this way it works perfectly, but the problem is to read objects sent from the java side.
The code I use in java is :
for(int i=0;i<10;i++){
ack = new AckOrder(i,"A","B", true);
amf3Output.writeObject(ack);
amf3Output.writeObjectEnd();
amf3Output.flush();
}
I have an handler on ProgressEvent.SOCKET_DATA :
trace((s.readObject() as FlexAck).id);
But I have errors such as :
Error #2030: End of File detected
Error #2006: Index Out of bound
If i add manipulations on ByteArrays, i manage to read the first object, but not the following.
s.readBytes(tmp,tmp.length);
content = clone(tmp);
(content.readObject());
trace("########################## OK OBJECT RECEIVED");
var ack:FlexAck = (tmp.readObject() as FlexAck);
trace("**********************> id = "+ack.id);
I've spent many our trying to find something in several forums etc, but nothing helped.
So if someone could help me it would be great.
Thanks
Sylvain
EDIT :
Here is an example that I thought should work, but doesn't I hope that it's better illustrate what I aim to do (permanent connection with socket and an exchange of messages).
Java class :
import java.net.ServerSocket;
import java.net.Socket;
import awl.oscare.protocol.AckOrder;
import flex.messaging.io.SerializationContext;
import flex.messaging.io.amf.Amf3Input;
import flex.messaging.io.amf.Amf3Output;
public class Main {
public static void main(String[] args) {
while(true)
{
try {
ServerSocket servSoc = new ServerSocket(8888);
Socket s = servSoc.accept();
System.out.println("connection accepted");
Amf3Output amf3Output = new Amf3Output(SerializationContext.getSerializationContext());
amf3Output.setOutputStream(s.getOutputStream());
Amf3Input amf3Input = new Amf3Input(SerializationContext.getSerializationContext());
amf3Input.setInputStream(s.getInputStream());
while(true)
{
try
{
System.out.println("Reading object");
Object obj = amf3Input.readObject();
if(obj!=null)
{
System.out.println(obj.getClass());
if (obj instanceof AckOrder)
{
AckOrder order = new AckOrder();
order.setId(((AckOrder)obj).getId());
order.setName(((AckOrder)obj).getName());
order.setSource(((AckOrder)obj).getSource());
order.setAckGroup(((AckOrder)obj).isAckGroup());
System.out.println(((AckOrder)obj).getId());
amf3Output.writeObject(order);
amf3Output.writeObjectEnd();
amf3Output.flush();
}
}
}
catch (Exception e)
{
e.printStackTrace();
break;
}
}
amf3Output.close();
amf3Input.close();
servSoc.close();
} catch (Exception e) {
// TODO Auto-generated catch block
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
}
Java Serializable object :
package protocol;
import java.io.Serializable;
public class AckOrder implements Serializable {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 5106528318894546695L;
private String id;
private String name;
private String source;
private boolean ackGroup = false;
public String getId() {
return this.id;
}
public void setId(String id) {
this.id = id;
}
public String getName() {
return this.name;
}
public void setName(String name) {
this.name = name;
}
public void setSource(String source) {
this.source = source;
}
public String getSource() {
return this.source;
}
public void setAckGroup(boolean ackGroup) {
this.ackGroup = ackGroup;
}
public boolean isAckGroup() {
return this.ackGroup;
}
public AckOrder()
{
super();
}
}
Flex Side :
Main flex code :
<fx:Script>
<![CDATA[
import mx.collections.ArrayCollection;
import mx.controls.Alert;
import mx.events.FlexEvent;
import mx.utils.object_proxy;
private var _socket:Socket = new Socket();;
private function onCreationComplete():void
{
this._socket.connect("localhost",8888);
this._socket.addEventListener(ProgressEvent.SOCKET_DATA, onData);
}
private function onData(e:ProgressEvent):void
{
if(this._socket.bytesAvailable)
{
this._socket.endian = Endian.LITTLE_ENDIAN;
var objects:Array = [];
try{
while(this._socket.bytesAvailable > 0)
{
objects.push(this._socket.readObject());
}
}catch(e:Error){trace(e.message);}
trace("|"+(objects)+"|");
}
}
protected function sendButton_clickHandler(event:MouseEvent):void
{
var tmp:FlexAck = new FlexAck;
tmp.id="1";
tmp.name="A";
tmp.source="B";
tmp.ackGroup=false;
this._socket.writeObject(tmp);
this._socket.flush();
}
]]>
</fx:Script>
<s:Button x="0" y="0" name="send" label="Send" click="sendButton_clickHandler(event)"/>
Flex serializable object :
package
{
[Bindable]
[RemoteClass(alias="protocol.AckOrder")]
public class FlexAck
{
public function FlexAck()
{
}
public var id:String;
public var name:String;
public var source:String;
public var ackGroup:Boolean;
}
}
Edit 25/05/2011 :
I've added those listeners in my flex code :
this._socket.addEventListener(Event.ACTIVATE,onActivate);
this._socket.addEventListener(Event.CLOSE,onClose);
this._socket.addEventListener(Event.CONNECT,onConnect);
this._socket.addEventListener(Event.DEACTIVATE,onDeactivate);
this._socket.addEventListener(IOErrorEvent.IO_ERROR,onIOerror);
this._socket.addEventListener(SecurityErrorEvent.SECURITY_ERROR,onSecurityError);
But There's no errors and I still don't manage to receive objects correctly.

You have to send the AMF data as ByteArray on the server:
final ByteArrayOutputStream baos = new ByteArrayOutputStream();
amf3Output.setOutputStream(baos);
amf3Output.writeObject(order);
amf3Output.flush();
amf3Output.close();
s.getOutputStream().write(baos.toByteArray());
Then
this._socket.readObject()
works as expected !

Hi the problem is caused by the following:
An AMF stream is stateful. When it serializes objects, it compresses them relative to objects that it have already been written.
Compression is achieved by referencing previously sent class descriptions, string values and objects using indexes (so for example, if the first string you sent was "heloWorld", when you later send that string, the AMF stream will sent string index 0).
Unfortunately, ByteArray and Socket do not maintain reference tables between readObject calls. Thus, even if you keep appending your newly read objects to the end of the same ByteArray object, each call to readObject instantiates new reference tables, discarding previously created ones (this means it should work for repeated references to the same string within an object tree)
In your example, you are always writing the same string values to properties. Thus when you send the second object, its string properties are not serialized as strings, but as references to the strings in the previously written object.
The solution, is to create a new AMF stream for each object you send.
This is complete rubbish of course(!) It means we can't really utilize the compression in custom protocols. It would be much better if our protocols could decide when to reset the these reference tables, perhaps when they got too big.
For example, if you have an RPC protocol, it would be nice to have an AMF stream pass the remote method names as references rather than strings for speed...
I haven't checked but I think this sort of thing is done by RTMP. The reason it probably wouldn't have been made available in developer objects like ByteArray and Socket (sigh, I hope this isn't true) is because Adobe wants to push us towards LCDS...
Addendum/edit: just found this, which provides a solution http://code.google.com/p/cvlib/

After looking at the code, I think what you want to do on the Java end is this:
for(int i=0;i<10;i++){
ack = new AckOrder(i,"A","B", true);
amf3Output.writeObject(ack);
}
amf3Output.flush();
When you do 'flush', you're sending information over the socket so you only had one object being sent at a time. On the Flex end, you should always try to see what's the length of the object and make sure you're not going over it which would cause this error.
EDIT:
private var _socket:Socket = new Socket();
private function onCreationComplete():void
{
// Add connection socket info here
this._socket.addEventListener(ProgressEvent.SOCKET_DATA, onData);
}
// This gets called every time we get new info, as in after the server flushes
private function onData(e:ProgressEvent):void
{
if(this._socket.bytesAvailable)
{
this._socket.endian = Endian.LITTLE_ENDIAN; // Might not be needed, but often is
// Try to get objects
var objects:Array = [];
try{
while(this._socket.bytesAvailable > 0)
{
objects.push(this._socket.readObject());
}
}catch(e:Error){}
// Do something with objects array
}
}
The onData function is called continually (every time the server sends info) since everything is asynchronous.

Tapestry dynamic generated image

My Tapestry5 application generate dynamically images with jFreeChart every day.
My problem is that i don't know how to show.
I have tried to save them into the webapp folder, but it seems impossible, no file is created inside.
I have tried a solution with StreamResponse without result.
Another one is about IEngineService but it seems to be only available for T4.
So, i would appreciate some help.
Thanks.

Ok i find where was the problem, here the solution, for the other class, please see Tapestry5: How To Stream An Existing Binary File.
public StreamResponse onImage() {
StreamResponse result = null;
if (graphic != null && graphic.getImage() != null) {
try {
InputStream input = new FileInputStream(graphic.getImage());
result = new PngInline(input, "test");
} catch (FileNotFoundException e) {
logger.error("Loading graphic image", e);
}
}
return result;
}
#Inject
private ComponentResources resources;
public Link getLink() {
return resources.createEventLink("image", new Object[]{});
}