#ModelAttribute in a method - java

Imagine a code like this one:
#RequestMapping(value="/users", method=RequestMethod.GET)
public String list(Model model) {
...
}
#InitBinder("user")
public void initBinder(WebDataBinder binder) {
binder.setDisallowedFields("password"); // Don't allow user to override the value
}
#ModelAttribute("user")
public User prepareUser(#RequestParam("username") String username){
...
}
#RequestMapping(value="/user/save", method=RequestMethod.POST)
public String save(#ModelAttribute("user") User user, Model model) {
...
}
I use an init binder to avoid that a field can be binded and I mark a method (prepareUser()) with #ModelAttribute to prepare my User object before it is binded. So when I invoke /user/save initBinder() and prepareUser() are executed.
I have set "user" in both #InitBinder and #ModelAttribute so Spring-MVC could understand that this methods should only be applied before executing a method with #ModelAttribute("user").
The problem is that the method annotated with #ModelAttribute("user") is executed before every mapped method of this controller. For example if I invoke /users prepareUser is executed before list() method. How can I make that this preparer is only executed before save() method having all the methods in the same controller?
Thanks

That's not really what #ModelAttribute is for. If you use it as a method parameter, it puts the annotated parameter into the model (that's fine). If you put it on a method, it's called every time to provide reference data that every method in the controller should have access to.
If you want to take control of building up your User object, you have several options. The two that are most obvious to me are:
Use your InitBinder method to add a new custom editor (a PropertyEditor class) for building User objects,
Use the conversion service in Spring 3 to convert string usernames to User objects.

Related

How can I specify method with an parameterized annotation and its value with #Pointcut

Background:
I am developing an web application with Spring MVC.
I want to make an aspect that is executed on POST requests and not executed on GET requests, because I want to inject the logic that prevent POST requests which are sent before completion of HTML rendering.
#RequestMapping(value = "/aaa", method = RequestMethod.POST)
public String methodForPost(AnDto dto, Model model) {
// the aspect should be executed on this method
}
#RequestMapping(value = "/bbb", method = RequestMethod.GET)
public String methodForGET(AnDto dto, Model model) {
// the aspect shouldn't be executed on this method
}
Question:
How can I specify method with an parameterized annotation and its value with #Pointcut ?
How can I specify method with an parameterized annotation and its value in <aop:pointcut> in Spring applicationContext.xml?
#Around(value="#annotation(RequestMapping)")
public Object display(ProceedingJoinPoint joinPoint, RequestMapping requestMapping ) throws Throwable {
// You have access to requestMapping. From which you can get whether its get or post and decide to proceed or not.
}
More info http://docs.spring.io/spring/docs/current/spring-framework-reference/html/aop.html#aop-ataspectj-advice-params-passing
You might have to extend this to intercept only for Requestmapping's in your package. Because this intercepts every RequestMappig you might have in your project including one used by the libraries which you might be using, which is a burden.

Deserializing abstract class Spring mvc

Let´s say that I have an abstract class A, that class is inside my MainClass, then I have the implementation of this class B and C. Using ModelAndAttribute I render in some scenarios MainClass with B and in others MainClass with C implementation. Both has the same commit method in the controller, so when I request this ModelAndAttribute in the form I´m waiting MainClass with B or C implementation as was render before, but Spring is it´s consider is A all the time "NullValueInNestedPathException, Invalid property, value of nested property is null".
Any idea if Spring has a mechanism to determine which implementation class is receiving?.
I´ve read this http://www.cowtowncoder.com/blog/archives/2010/03/entry_372.html and looks promising but I cannot interact or I dont want interact with Jackson about how serialize the entities.
Regards.
Spring will not decide which implementation to instantiate.
You will have to add some code to decide which of the 2 class needs to be initiated
We have similar requirement
we pass the type ClassB or ClassC in request parameter
We have method
#ModelAttribute (value = "mainClass")
public void populateObjectBasedOnRequestParameter (
ModelMap modelMap, HttpServletRequest request)
this method basically reads the request parameter and instantiate the mainClass with correct implementation of class A
For the form submit
#RequestMapping (value = "/{workItemId}", method = RequestMethod.POST, params = "save", consumes = MediaType.ALL_VALUE)
public String commit(
#ModelAttribute ("mainClass")MainClass mainClass,
BindingResult result, Principal principal,
HttpServletRequest request, final ModelMap model) {
when the form is submitted with request parameter
populateObjectBasedOnRequestParameter() this method is executed so the model map has the initiated implementation for Class A when commit() method is executed

Spring MVC: Passing a Model as an argument to a controller method VS instantiating it explicitly

I have created two test methods in my MVC Controller class. In the first method the Model is being passed as an argument and in the second one I instantiate it directly. In both methods I add a single attribute to the Model instance:
#RequestMapping("/test-modelParam")
public String testMethod1(Model model) {
model.addAttribute("testname", "testvalue");
return "/testview";
}
#RequestMapping("/test-modelInstantiatedExplicitly")
public ModelAndView testMethod2() {
ModelAndView mav = new ModelAndView("/testview");
mav.addObject("testname", "testvalue");
return mav;
}
The View gets populated correctly in both cases.
Is there any difference between the two approaches? If so, Where is it preferred to use one over the other?
In the end there is no difference everything will end up in a ModelAndView eventually.
When using the Model or ModelMap as a method argument it will get pre-populated with some values
Path Variables
Result of any #ModelAttribute annotated methods
Any #SessionAttributes available to the controller
In short it is the pre-populated model made available to the method.
The Model is always created and is merged with the one you add/create with a ModelAndView.

How is a #ModelAttribute injected without any explicit reference

I have a controller that works, but I do not understand why it works. Here it is:
#Controller
#RequestMapping("/someUrl")
public class MyController {
#Autowired
private SomeService someService;
#RequestMapping(method = RequestMethod.GET)
public String page() throws ApplicationException {
return "page";
}
#ModelAttribute("modelAttribute")
public PageModel loadPageModel() throws ApplicationException {
return someService.createPageModel();
}
}
Visiting "/someUrl" will get me to the view of the name "page", as it is expected. What is puzzling, is that despite the model attribute "modelAttribute", or an object of type "PageModel" is not referenced anywhere near the method page, the modelAttribute is still visible for the view. I am happy that this works, but I do not understand why. Any thoughts?
#ModelAttribute is somewhat overloaded, and serves two main functions depending on where it's declared.
With method parameter:
#RequestMapping(value="/create", method=POST)
public String createPage(#ModelAttribute("pageModel") PageModel pageModel) ...
For example, when #ModelAttribute is declared with a method parameter, and you submit parameters to that method, Spring will try to bind the submitted params to an object of type PageModel. Where does it get the PageModel: 1) if there's one currently in Spring managed model, use that 2) otherwise it will create a PageModel using the default constructor of PageModel object
At the method declaration (how you're using it):
#ModelAttribute("modelAttribute")
public PageModel loadPageModel() throws ApplicationException {
return someService.createPageModel();
}
In your case, when#ModelAttribute is declared at the method level, it tells Spring that the method will provide a PageModel before any RequestMapping is called for a particular request. The created PageModel instance is put into Springs managed model under a "modelAttribute" key. Then from your views, you should be able to reference that PageModel.
So the request goes something like this (i'm only showing relevant events):
request for /someUrl
Spring maps request to page() method
Spring see's that page() method is annotated with #RequestMapping so it calls all methods annotated with #ModelAttribute (at the method level) before executing page()
redirect to "page" view, where a PageModel under "modelAttribute" key is available for you to use
Note:
if your loadPageModel() method did not return a PageModel, it would still be called.
if you had multiple methods declared with #ModelAttribute at the method level, they would all be called each time a method with #RequestMapping is executed
As the contract for the ModelAttribute annotation puts it:
Annotation that binds a (..) method return value to a named model attribute, exposed to a web view.
Supported for controller classes with #RequestMapping methods.
In other words you are adding an attribute implicitely by returning it.
Why this works?
I don't know how internally Spring is doing it but what is enough for us to know is how we can make it eligible for Spring MVC to identify and make it available to the view which is well documented:
having #RequestMapping Controller methods (in your case implicitly defined at the class level)
having one of the supported return types that are combined with the ModelAttribute annotation.
of course being within the component-scan area
Have a good look at ModelAttributeMethodProcessor and lookup the handleReturnValue method. This method will be executed on controller methods annotated with #ModelAttribute.
/**
* Add non-null return values to the {#link ModelAndViewContainer}.
*/
#Override
public void handleReturnValue(
Object returnValue, MethodParameter returnType,
ModelAndViewContainer mavContainer, NativeWebRequest webRequest)
throws Exception {
if (returnValue != null) {
String name = ModelFactory.getNameForReturnValue(returnValue, returnType);
mavContainer.addAttribute(name, returnValue);
}
}
You can see it simply adds it's return value to the model and is invoked with every request concerning that particular controller.
P.s. The starting point of most "magic" operations can be found in RequestMappingHandlerAdapter which is the default HandlerAdapter for modern Spring MVC applications.

How to maintain session in spring MVC?

Using spring MVC, I need to store my object into session and I should use the same object in several jsp pages using jstl. I have tried like this:
ModelAndView modelAndView = new ModelAndView("admin/addproduct", "category", categorynameList);
But I can't access the category to other jsp pages except addproduct page.
How can I do that?
Spring MVC provides more than one mechanisms that hide the plain use of HttpSession from you.
Have a look at the #SessionAttributes annotation, which allows you to define the attributes that will be stored in the session by your controller; this mechanism is mainly intended to maintain the conversational state for your handler and that state is usually cleared once the conversation is complete.
Also, you can define your bean as session scoped in the application context and then make use of a ScopedProxyFactoryBean (by simply adding an <aop:scoped-proxy/> element in your bean definition), thus being able to inject that bean in your singleton controllers.
You can pass the session directly to any annotated controller method:
#RequestMapping("somePathName")
public String someHandler(HttpSession session) {
session.setAttribute(...
The annotation #SessionAttributes is used on class level. Typically it's used on the #Controller class. It's 'value' element is of type String[] whose values are the matching names used in #ModelAttribute either on method level or on handler's method parameter level.
Let's consider following arrangement:
#Controller
#SessionAttributes("visitor")
#RequestMapping("/trades")
public class TradeController {
#ModelAttribute("visitor")
public Visitor getVisitor (....) {
return new Visitor(....);
}
....
}
In above code, when a request comes in, the first thing Spring will do is to notice #SessionAttributes('visitor') and then attempt to find the value of 'visitor' in javax.servlet.http.HttpSession. If it doesn't find the value, then the method with #ModelAttribute having the same name 'visitor' (method getVisitor()) will be invoked. The returned value from such method will be used to populate the session with name 'visitor'.
Now that 'visitor' with it's value is already in HttpSession, let's consider following arrangement:
#Controller
#SessionAttributes("visitor")
#RequestMapping("/trades")
public class TradeController {
#RequestMapping("/**")
public String handleRequestById (#ModelAttribute("visitor") Visitor visitor,
Model model,
HttpServletRequest request) {
model.addAttribute("msg", "trades request, serving page " +
request.getRequestURI());
visitor.addPageVisited(request.getRequestURI());
return "traders-page";
}
.......
}
On finding #ModelAttribute("visitor") in the target handler method, Spring will retrieve the value of 'visitor' from the session and will assign the value to the Visitor parameter and will invoke the method. At this step, Spring doesn't care how the session was populated with 'visitor', Whether it was populated using the last arrangement or some other way, it doesn't matter, Spring only requires the annotation #SessionAttributes('visitor'), the handler method parameter with #ModelAttribute("visitor") and the value of 'visitor' in HttpSession. If spring can't find it in the session and last arrangement is not available then following exception will be thrown:
org.springframework.web.HttpSessionRequiredException: Expected session attribute 'visitor'
In other words: when the target handler method is invoked first time in a given session, then method with #ModelAttribute('visitor) is invoked, the returned value is populated in HttpSession and the handler method with the same value is invoked. For the subsequent requests within the same HTTPSession, Spring retrieves the same object from the session and doesn't call the method with #ModelAttribute('visitor') again till the end of the session
Following is the complete controller class:
#Controller
#SessionAttributes("visitor")
#RequestMapping("/trades")
public class TradeController {
#RequestMapping("/**")
public String handleRequestById (#ModelAttribute("visitor") Visitor visitor,
Model model,
HttpServletRequest request) {
model.addAttribute("msg", "trades request, serving page " +
request.getRequestURI());
visitor.addPageVisited(request.getRequestURI());
return "traders-page";
}
#ModelAttribute("visitor")
public Visitor getVisitor (HttpServletRequest request) {
return new Visitor(request.getRemoteAddr());
}
}
In above example we are tracking the user visited pages within the same HTTP session. We are using the wildcard '/**' so that all request starting with 'trades' will map to this controller.
Inject session to your controller classes, store your object there and use it when you need it, e.g.:
#Controller
public class SomeController {
//#Autowired
//private HttpSession session; This is not desired. See the discussion in the
//comments.
#RequestMapping("somePathName")
public String someHandler(HttpSession session) { //Session will be injected by
//Spring without any additional annotations.
//...
session.setAttribute("category", yourObject);
}
}
If you need to access category on other pages than admin/addproduct you will need to add it to respective models as follows:
#RequestMapping("somePathName")
public String someHandler(Model model) {
//...
model.addAttribute("category", yourObject);
//...
return "yourPageName";
}
Update: according to ALex's comment that injecting HttpSession instance into field is strongly not desired due to thread safety concerns I've changed the source respectively.

Categories

Resources