I like eclipse save actions feature, but I can't get rid of one little annoying thing. I use sorting members and methods on save.
The good thing is, eclipse moves member/method to correct position, alphabetically.
The bad thing is, when I am writing method and save it, eclipse moves method but not current caret position. So basically, I press CTRL+S and end somehwere at completely other place then I was before, so I have to scroll up/down to find new location of my method.
Is there some kind of workaround?
I am using Eclipse 3.6 Helios atm.
It sounds like a bug, try submitting it to eclipse at this site.
As a workaround - but not the best one, you can use Ctrl-O to find the method.
2 more workaround options:
Set a //TODO return here in the line that you want to return to, then you can filter the task view by a specific todo.
Put breakpoint before saving.
Generally I prefer not to use options like this, since when working with other poeple in a large scale project, it can cause a lot of noise. I mean that if you make a change to an existing file, then save it and then the format happen. next step you will commit this file to the repository. when someone or even you try to look at the diff of the change, it will be cluttered with all the formatting and sorting. So I prefer doing it as an independent change.
Related
I have a tool that will list failed tests, and I would like a way to open a fully qualified class and goto a method in Eclipse with a single string I can copy from the results. It can use any pattern whatsoever (I can change the test results layout), but could be something like this example:
com.my.package.StringUtilTest:testValueOf
I shall use it for re-running tests, but could work with any methods. It could go to the first option when there are overloads (won't matter for me). It could also list all options and allow me to paste the string and enter to go to the first option (being the only one in my case), or selecting the correct one from the very narrowed down options, just like Ctrl + O will do (note Ctrl + O will work on current file only though). It could even accept (or require!) the parameter types, won't matter. Anything like that would be a huge thanks. Some place where I can paste a single string on (in any way that it may have to be) to open a specific method.
I've been looking for a while, could be built-in or configured shortcut, macro, plugin, et cetera, but could neither find nor wrap my head around doing something (not expert on eclipsetalities)... I tried searching for a lot different stuff, but as you can see my problem can be solved with a vast pletora of things (none of which I can find anywhere though).
Eclipse jdt doesn't have it yet, but I believe an open method dialog similar to the open type dialog is in the works.. Please create a bug at bugs.eclipse.org if one doesn't exist describing what you would want in such a dialog.
I've returned to IntelliJ after a long hiatus for Android development so I'm getting used to it again. The problem I have is that for example when you want to see where is a class being used, you'd position the caret in the class declaration and issue cmdaltF7 (on Mac OS X) to Find Usages, which is returning stuff from mapping.txt and seeds.txt as well as the .java results, and even tho I can set up the defaults by doing shiftcmdaltF7 and un-tick the: search for text occurrences and even change the scope from Project Files to a custom scope (for example), these options are not saved when I invoke Find Usages again.
Does anybody know of a way to personalize the Find Usages so it's more close to what Eclipse would do? (I.e., find the real usages instead of a text search for occurrences).
Reporting back from the future: the behaviour described in the question has now been implemented (Intellij issue mentioned in the comments).
To configure cmdaltF7 to run in a default scope, start by running it against some Symbol
Clicking on the wrench icon, one can select one of the pre-defined scopes, or create a new one (using the ... button).
The + creates a new scope. Find the folder in which to look, and click Include recursively. And voila!
Any consequent searches will use that scope until it is changed.
Instead of cmdaltF7, use the shortcut altF7. This will open a pop-up for you to make a selection about Scope, Test occurrences, and types of usage. You will have to make this selection one time. The next time you press altF7 then your choices are remembered.
The result is that altF7 followed by enter gives you what you need.
We have 5-10 developers working on Eclipse with Java here in our shop, and we often are debugging classes that don't have debug-friendly toString().
Along comes Detail Formatters to save the day. Hurray! But only my day. If I want to share the joy with my fellow devs, I THINK I have to do some copying and pasting, as do they.
That sucks. We've got N different version control systems that work in Eclipse... it seems like this would be something that folks would Like To Pass Around.
Nothing in the file->export... dialog. Nothing via searching the online help. Nothing.
I managed to track at least some of the settings to /workspace/.plugins/org.eclipse.core.runtime/.settings/org.eclipse.jdt.dbug.ui.prefs, but Have Reason To Believe there's more to it than that. Plus, the thought of putting something burried deep in a hidden folder into source control puts my teeth on edge.
Is there a better way to share detail formatters? Ideally this would be something we could just check into our code repo and disseminate that way.
EDIT: I'm using Helios, Service Release 1, build id 20100917-0705.
In addition to the javaLogicalStructures extension point (for adding logical structure to given classes), there's also one called detailPaneFactories. But this is for creating the pane the text (or whatever, thanks to this extension point) the detail formatter renders to. Neither allows extenders to list existing detail formatters (or logical structures for that matter).
The bottom of the detailPaneFactories extension does have Something Interesting To Say:
Supplied Implementation:
The debug platform contributes a detail pane factory providing a default
text source viewer detail pane. The default detail pane displays textual
details of a selected element based on the corresponding debug model
presentation's implementation of computeDetail(IValue value,
IValueDetailListener listener).
computeDetail sounds promising. I'll keep ya posted (unless someone else beats me to it... hurray bounties).
Hmm... org.eclipse.jdt.debug.ui.JavaDebugUtils.getPreferenceStore() sounds promising, but I'd still rather not write a plugin for this myself.
Ah... well. Here's the code org.eclipse.jdt.internal.debug.ui.JavaDetailFormattersManager uses to load them:
/**
* Populate the detail formatters map with data from preferences.
*/
private void populateDetailFormattersMap() {
String[] detailFormattersList= JavaDebugOptionsManager.parseList(JDIDebugUIPlugin.getDefault().getPreferenceStore().getString(IJDIPreferencesConstants.PREF_DETAIL_FORMATTERS_LIST));
fDetailFormattersMap= new HashMap(detailFormattersList.length / 3);
for (int i= 0, length= detailFormattersList.length; i < length;) {
String typeName= detailFormattersList[i++];
String snippet= detailFormattersList[i++].replace('\u0000', ',');
boolean enabled= ! JavaDetailFormattersPreferencePage.DETAIL_FORMATTER_IS_DISABLED.equals(detailFormattersList[i++]);
fDetailFormattersMap.put(typeName, new DetailFormatter(typeName, snippet, enabled));
}
}
So the string in the preference store is just a bunch of CSVs with type-name,snippet,enabled,type-name... replace \u0000 with , in the snippets, and you're good to go.
That handles the export (hell, you could just dump the preference string whole hog).
Import wouldn't be much harder, though it'd be nice to not overwrite existing types, or given the user the option to do so, perhaps even with a diff of the two snippets in question.
OTOH, I'd really rather not rely on the inner workings of a class in *.internal.*.
From the Eclipse 3.8 and 4.2 M5 - New and Noteworthy:
Detail formatters can now be exported as separate preferences.
Previously the only way to share detail formatters was to export all of your workspace settings.
This closes the bug 224815 mentioned by Brian De Alwis in his answer:
"Make Detail formatters exportable" (with that patch)
Although there is nothing explicit in the preferences export wizard, exporting everything will also write the detail formatters. Just search in the output file for /instance/org.eclipse.jdt.debug.ui/org.eclipse.jdt.debug.ui.detail_formatters and share only those lines.
Update: There seems to be a bug in the importer, you have to remove the /instance/ prefix from each line before importing the file.
Alternatively, as they are stored in a properties file in the workspace metadata, you can share that (although you'll probably overwrite other debug settings if you just copy the file):
${workspace}\.metadata\.plugins\org.eclipse.core.runtime\.settings\org.eclipse.jdt.debug.ui.prefs
Using a "macro" might do the trick here.
You will have to
Install a plugin that lets you
record Macros
Start recording Macro and configure Detail formatters using Eclipse Menus
Save and keep that
macro on some shared directory
Install that plugin and run macro on
PCs used by other developers
One such plugin is : http://sourceforge.net/projects/practicalmacro/reviews/
This issue was filed in the Eclipse Bugzilla as bug 224815. The problem is that the detail formatters were overlooked when configuring the import/export preference transfers. The fix, providing it's accepted, should be in the 3.8/4.2 M6 due out at the end of January.
This question already has answers here:
Does Eclipse have line-wrap
(12 answers)
Closed 7 years ago.
I already have word wrap for Eclipse PHP (How can I get word wrap to work in Eclipse PDT for PHP files?). What about Eclipse Java? Is there a similar tool to wrap Java code lines?
Ctrl+Shift+F will format a file in Eclipse, breaking long lines into multiple lines and nicely word-wrapping comments. You can also highlight just a section of text and format that.
I realize this is not an automatic soft/hard word wrap, but I don't think the question was asking for anything fancy.
Just like to point out that word wrapping is a terrible idea in code. I suppose everyone has their own style, but typically you should refactor or rethink blocks of code that take much more than a single average horizontal screen. (about 1280 pixels)
Of course there are always exceptions... like verbose exceptions for example, but these are not critical for code understanding.
Scanning a line that goes beyond a single horizontal screen, or having to read a thought that stacks on multiple lines will make your code much more difficult to figure out.
Additionally, line counts will be weird, as word wrapping will make a single line seem like it takes up 2, 3, or shudder the thought... 4 lines of code.
As far as comments go, line returns should not be much of a problem for anyone.
Also keep in mind, word wrapping code is not a common practice, and you are essentially saying that everyone reading your code should turn word wrapping on, which is, I'm sorry to say, an unnecessarily painful thing to make others working with your code do....
If nesting is causing you the need for word wrap... well this is also a very bad code smell.
That's my two-cents.
This is for anyone who is having the following problem with the "Ahtik" word-wrap plugin in Texlipse: the plugin installs fine, but selecting the "word-wrap" option using the context menu (or pressing ctrl+alt+w) causes the text to wrap momentarily, and then just flick back to being unwrapped (this probably includes anyone using Windows 7).
Here is a fix...straight from the developer himself! I emailed Ahti Kitsik in a last-ditch attempt to find a way round, and was amazed when he actually found a solution, and sent it to me the next day. He suggested that in return I could just make this information widely available.
So, the way to fix it as follows:
Look up the texlipse plugin location. This will probably be in the Eclipse folder, and the address will probably end: ...\eclipse\plugins\net.sourceforge.texlipse_1.5.0.
Backup the plugin.xml file there just in case, and then edit the original by deleting the following chunks of code:
-Firstly, the "action" (starting at line 843):
action
class="net.sourceforge.texlipse.actions.TexWordWrapAction"
definitionId="net.sourceforge.texlipse.commands.texWordWrap"
icon="icons/wrap.gif"
id="net.sourceforge.texlipse.actions.texWordWrap"
label="W&rap text"
menubarPath="net.sourceforge.texlipse.menus.latex/latexGroup"
style="toggle"
toolbarPath="latexGroup"
tooltip="Use word wrap"
-Secondly, the "command" (starting at line 972):
command
categoryId="net.sourceforge.texlipse.latexEditingCategory"
name="Wrap text"
id="net.sourceforge.texlipse.commands.texWordWrap"
(When you have done this, the file should be 1257 lines long, instead of 1271).
Finally, Ahti says: "Start eclipse with -clean command line argument to force reloading of plugin.xml." (Personally I had no idea how to do this, so I just removed and reinstalled his plugin, then exited Eclipse, and edited the code before I restarted it).
The function should work fine now. Hope this helps someone. And thanks again Ahti!
In the meantime, there has been an fork to Ahtik's word wrap plugin which, I must say, works very nice and fixes jumbled line numbering bug: Eclipse Word-Wrap Plug-In
Open Eclipse -> Help -> Install New Software -> Click "Add.." button and copy this line "http://dev.cdhq.de/eclipse/updatesite/luna/" into field Name and Location -> Click OK
Check -> Line Number Ruler and Word Wrap Feature -> Next -> Next -> Finish -> Restard Eclipse!
I'm working in a java project where a big part of the code was written with a formatting style that I don't like (and is also non standard), namely all method parameters are in uppercase (and also all local variables).
On IntellJ I am able to use "Analyze -> Inspect Code" and actually find all occurrences of uppercase method parameters (over 1000).
To fix one occurrence I can do "refactor > rename parameter" and it works fine (let's assume there is no overlapping).
Is there a way to automagically doing this refactor (e.g: rename method parameter starting with uppercase to same name starting with lowercase)?
Use a Source Parser
I think what you need to do is use a source code parser like javaparser to do this.
For every java source file, parse it to a CompilationUnit, create a Visitor, probably using ModifierVisitorAdapter as base class, and override (at least) visit(MethodDeclaration, arg). Then write the changed CompilationUnit to a new File and do a diff afterwards.
I would advise against changing the original source file, but creating a shadow file tree may me a good idea (e.g. old file: src/main/java/com/mycompany/MyClass.java, new file src/main/refactored/com/mycompany/MyClass.java, that way you can diff the entire directories).
I'd advise that you think about a few things before you do anything:
If this is a team effort, inform your team.
If this is for an employer, inform your boss.
If this is checked into a version control system, realize that you'll have diffs coming out the wazoo.
If it's not checked into a version control system, check it in.
Take a backup before you make any changes.
See if you have some tests to check before & after behavior hasn't changed.
This is a dangerous refactoring. Be careful.
I am not aware of any direct support for such refactoring out of the box in IDEs. As most IDEs would support name refactoring (which is regularly used). You may need to write some IDE plugin that could browse through source code (AST) and invoke rename refactoring behind the scene for such parameter names matching such format.
I have done a lot of such refactorings on a rather large scale of files, using TextPad or WildPad, and a bunch of reg-ex replace-all. Always worked for me!
I'm confident that if the code is first formatted using an IDE like Eclipse (if it is not properly formatted), and then a reg-ex involving the methods' signature (scope, return-type, name, bracket, arg list, bracket) can be devised, your job will be done in seconds with these tools. You might need more than one replace-all sets of reg-ex.
The only time-taking activity would be to come up with such a set of reg-ex.
Hope this helps!