Here's the facts :
I have 2 jars that contain JPA entities in my webapp,
and entities from one jar (jar A) has references of entities in another jar (jarB)
I put the <jar-file>/WEB-INF/lib/MyJarB.jar</jar-file> in the persistence.xml of jar A
But i dont want to hardcode the /WEB-INF/lib/MyJarB.jar because i could be testing the entities in a test environment, and would love to have another way of specifying entities jar dependencies other than hardcoding the path.
I tried the <jar-file>MyJarB.jar</jar-file> and <jar-file>./MyJarB.jar</jar-file>, but both failed.
Please share your thoughts.
Create another persistence.xml for pure testing only and put it in project B itself or another sub-project which contains test classes.
I recommend NOT putting the persistence.xml together with your JARs, because the persistence definition is the application concern. Therefore it would be better to have a persistence.xml in your web module, declaring both JARs:
<jar-file>/WEB-INF/lib/MyJarA.jar</jar-file>
<jar-file>/WEB-INF/lib/MyJarB.jar</jar-file>
In case you have tests in your web module, and you want to use another persistece definition, just create an alternate persistence.xml, say in src/test/resources, and just use that one to instantiate your EntityManagerFactory.
Related
We are trying to use spring-test's SpringExtension to write integration tests for our Spring and Hibernate-based Tomcat web application. Our sessionFactory bean configuration has the property configured mappingJarLocations with a sample value as /WEB-INF/lib/company-common*.jar which contains hibernate mapping files. In both actual deployment and Eclipse dev deployment, this works fine as the docBasePath (in Servlet environment) is appended to this pattern and the files are getting resolved. But this is not the case while running JUnit test cases either in a local or a CI environment.
We tried our best to use the provided support by having few overridden implementations of WebTestContextBootstraper, GenricXmlWebContextLoader, XmlWebApplicationContext, and WebDelegatingSmartContextLoader but had to finally give up as we cannot override the final method org.springframework.test.context.web.AbstractGenericWebContextLoader.loadContext(MergedContextConfiguration) to provide the custom implementation of XmlWebApplicationContext. Our current approach is to manually create the application context and use it in the tests.
Here is the project structure:
Project_WebApp
|--src/**
|--WebContent/**
|--pom.xml
When the app is packaged as Project_WebApp.war, the dependencies are inside WEB-INF/lib from the root of extracted war. When deployed as a webapp in Tomcat using Eclipse, the dependencies are copied to <Eclipse_Workspace_Dir>/.metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.wst.server.core/tmp0/Project_WebApp/WEB-INF/lib. In both cases, the dependencies are available at <Resource_Base_Path>/WEB-INF/lib and Resource_Base_Path has no relation to Project_WebApp base directory.
Questions:
Did any one use SpringExtension in a scenario similar to above? If so can you suggest any alternative approaches?
Instead of /WEB-INF/lib/company-common*.jar, we tried a classpath-based pattern but didn't work as the obtained class path resources don't match the pattern. Is there anything else to try here?
I have muli moduled maven based application. There are several change sets in each module. I want to write integration tests in one of them. I know it's bad idea but, i have business log constraints.
In considered module i have code that uses repositories from 2 others modules. During tests i have to initialize tables from change sets in different modules. I don't know how to use absolute path to change sets or how to use liquibase config.
I tried use include or includeAll tags, but in classpath where tests run i can't call change sets out of module.
Hope for your ideas.
you should be able to create liquibase instance in your junit by passing absolute file paths. You can refer liquibase tests in github for more info
new Liquibase(changeLogFile, FileSystemResourceAccesor, database);
https://github.com/liquibase/liquibase/blob/master/liquibase-integration-tests/src/test/java/liquibase/dbtest/AbstractIntegrationTest.java#L890
I would like to test that a spring
#Configuration class
can handle missing files on the classpath. E.g. when using PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer. But this is just a specific example, the question is really about how to test classes that interact with the classpath (e.g. read a file located in src/main/resources in a maven project).
So in essence I would like to create a spring context where I control the classpath in the test set up code.
The test needs to be a JUnit test.
Hope below may help you
#RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
#ContextConfiguration(locations = {"classpath*:/testApplicationContext.xml"})
public class YourTestClass{
you have to create a spring context for your test and you can include the production one into it. you can replace classpath*: with a absolute location.
Regards, Rajib.
This work if it's a maven project:
move the classpath file that you want to test the absence from to a separate pom jar module, and include it wherever needed.
move the classpath test to a separate pom jar module named missing-classpath-file-test, but don't include the module with the file that you want to simulate as missing. I will be missing from the classpath only for that test.
When running missing-classpath-file-test, the file will not be on the classpath, and the error you need to reproduce is achieved.
Concerning the question on the comment bellow, with the class loaders that come with application servers and the one used on a junit test it's not possible to programmatically change the classpath.
I'm working on a project which includes persistence library (JPA 1.2), EJB 3 and Web presentation layer (JSF). I develop application using Eclipse and application is published on Websphere Application Server Community Edition (Geronimo 2.1.4) through eclipse plugin (but the same thing happens if I publish manually). When publishing to server I get the following error:
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not fully load class: manager.administration.vehicles.VehicleTypeAdminBean
due to:manager/vehicles/VehicleType
in classLoader:
org.apache.geronimo.kernel.classloader.TemporaryClassLoader#18878c7
at org.apache.xbean.finder.ClassFinder.(ClassFinder.java:177)
at org.apache.xbean.finder.ClassFinder.(ClassFinder.java:146)...
In web.xml I have reference to EJB:
<ejb-local-ref>
<ejb-ref-name>ejb/VehicleTypeAdmin</ejb-ref-name>
<ejb-ref-type>Session</ejb-ref-type>
<local>manager.administration.vehicles.VehicleTypeAdmin</local>
<ejb-link>VehicleTypeAdminBean</ejb-link>
</ejb-local-ref>
EJB project has a reference to persistence project, and Web project has references to both projects. I don't get any compilation errors, so I suppose classes and references are correct.
I don't know if it is app server problem, but I ran previously application on the same server using same configuration parameters.
Does anybody have a clue what might be the problem?
Looks almost like it couldn't find the class manager.vehicles.VehicleType when it was attempting to create/load the class manager.administration.vehicles.VehicleTypeAdminBean.
I've encountered similar problems before. When the class loader attempts to load the class it looks at the import statements (and other class usage declarations) and then attempts to load those classes and so on until it reaches the bottom of the chain (ie java.lang.Object). If it cannot find one class along the chain (in your case it looks like it cannot load VehicleType) then it will state that it cannot load the class at the top of the chain (in your case VehicleTypeAdminBean).
Is the VehicleType class in a different jar? If you have a web module and and EJB module do you have the jar containing the VehicleType class in the appropriate place(s). Sometimes with web projects you have to put the jars in the WebContent/WEB-INF/lib folder or it won't find them.
Are both of these projects deployed separately (ie. two ears? or one ear and one war?) or are they together (ie, one ear with jars and a war inside?). I'm assuming the second given you declared your EJB local?
The jars that you are dependent on also have to be declared in your MANIFEST.MF files in the projects that use it.
I'm kind of running on guesses since I do not know your project structure. Showing that would help quite a bit. But I'd still check on where VehicleType is located with regards to your EJB class. You might find it isn't where you think it is come packaging or runtime.
Thanks #Chris for WebContent/WEB-INF/lib idea ! it works for me by following these steps :
1- Export my EJBs to a JAR (MyEJBs.jar)
2- I created another jar with your_installation_path/IBM/SDP/runtimes/your_version/binCreateEJBStrub.bat via CMD.exe, by executing this command :
createEJBStubs.bat <my_path>/MyEJBs.jar -newfile –quiet
3- A new jar will be automatically created in the same directory as MyEJBs.jar named MyEJBs_withStubs.jar
4- Put your new jar in WebContent/WEB-INF/lib
5- Call your EJBs by :
MyEJBRemote eJBRemote;
InitialContext ic = new InitialContext();
obj = ic.lookup("your_ejb_name_jndi");
eJBRemote = (MyEJBRemote ) PortableRemoteObject.narrow(obj,
MyEJBRemote.class);
eJBRemote = (MyEJBRemote ) obj;
Now you can call your EJBs from another EAR
I'm using maven war plugin to build war package.
Before package is build test are executed. To preinitialize my database with sample data I use spring bean. I would like to have different data in my db for tests and different when application starts.
I was thinking that maybe it is possible to use two different spring initializer classes in 'test' and 'war' phases but I don't know how to achieve this.
You have to put the different classes you need into src/main/java or src/test/java or may be supplemental application.xml into src/main/resources or src/test/resources. The test initializer can be done by a Test class which initializes first before all tests are running (take a look at testng which has this kind of feature).
Your tests should not be using the production Spring context (xml) files.
Instead, if you need to access an ApplicationContext in your tests (or if you are using a base testcase class like AbstractTransactionalJUnit4SpringContextTests), set up a test-context.xml context which points to the test database configuration and the test data scripts.