Sometimes my beans are not able to initialized properly due to external factors. Such as the MongoDB instance not being online. Is there a graceful way of handling the failed bean initializations? The following is the bean in question:
#Bean
public MorphiaDataSource morphiaDataSource() {
try {
MorphiaDataSource bean = new MorphiaDataSource();
Mongo mongo = new Mongo(mongoHost, mongoPort);
bean.setMongo(mongo);
bean.setMorphia(new Morphia());
bean.setDatabase(mongoDatabase);
bean.setUsername(mongoUsername);
bean.setPassword(mongoPassword);
return bean;
} catch(Exception e) {
logger.error("Error creating MorphiaDataSource: " + e.getMessage());
// Tell the context it's screwed?
}
return null;
}
If you rethrow the exception the context will stop loading and your application will be effectively dead. Or if you really want the JVM to completely stop call System.exit(1)
Related
Bank.java
#Stateless
#Local
public class Bank implements IBank {
#EJB
IConfigBean iConfigBean;
#EJB
IDbs iDBS;
#EJB
IPosb iPosb;
#Override
public void doTransaction() {
System.out.println("--Bank Transaction Started--");
try {
Config config1 = getConfig(1);
iConfigBean.create(config1);
iDBS.doDBSTransaction();
Config config3 = getConfig(3);
iConfigBean.create(config3);
iPosb.doPOSBTransaction();
Config config5 = getConfig(5);
iConfigBean.create(config5);
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
System.out.println("---Bank Exception--");
}
System.out.println("--Bank Transaction End--");
}
#Override
public Config getConfig(int inserttionOrderNo) {
Config config = new Config();
config.setType("EJBTransactionTESTING - " + inserttionOrderNo);
return config;
}
}
DBS.java
#Stateless
#Local
public class DBS implements IDbs {
#EJB
IConfigBean iConfigBean;
#Override
public void doDBSTransaction() {
System.out.println("--DBS Transaction Started--");
try {
Config config2 = getConfig(2);
iConfigBean.create(config2);
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
System.out.println("--DBS Exception--");
}
System.out.println("--DBS Transaction End--");
}
#Override
public Config getConfig(int inserttionOrderNo) {
Config config = new Config();
config.setType("EJBTransactionTESTING - " + inserttionOrderNo);
return config;
}
}
POSB.java
#Stateless
#Local
public class POSB implements IPosb {
#EJB
IConfigBean iConfigBean;
#Override
public void doPOSBTransaction() {
System.out.println("--POSB Transaction Started--");
try {
Config config4 = getConfig(4);
iConfigBean.create(config4);
if (true) {
//For Test 1
//throw new NullPointerException();
}
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
System.out.println("--POSB Exception--");
}
if (true) {
//For Test 2
// throw new NullPointerException();
}
System.out.println("--POSB Transaction End--");
}
#Override
public Config getConfig(int inserttionOrderNo) {
Config config = new Config();
config.setType("EJBTransactionTESTING - " + inserttionOrderNo);
return config;
}
}
I am new to Stack Overflow and Its my new question so correct me If I am wrong.
Environment is..
Windows 10
Java 1.8
Eclipse
Tomcat 8.5
EJB3
I have Three stateless bean, Please look at the Sequence Diagram of the Transaction flow.
I purposely making NullPointer Exception at two places during the transaction to know the difference and I have marked with Lightening Bold symbol in sequence diagram.
I am not using any #TransactionAttribute to any methods.
Test 1 - Null Pointer in Inside the try block (Lightening Bold symbol with Green)
When I start the testing, Got Null pointer exception and all the transaction are not marked for roll back and data also got inserted in db.
I can only see Null pointer exception in the console log.
Test 2 - Null Pointer in Outside the try - catch method (Lightening Bold symbol with Red)
When I start the testing, Got Null pointer exception plus EJBTransactionRolledbackException and all the transaction marked for roll back and no data inserted in db.
I can see NullPointer and EJBTransactionRolledback Exception in the console log.
Question here is,
Why EJB transaction is not marked for roll back If I made Null pointer inside try block
Why EJB transaction is roll back happens If I made null pointer outside try block
Thanks in advance.
Keep in mind EJB calls, all the "magic" made by container happens there, including transaction markup. It's possible due to the fact that EJB calls are not direct, but always go through proxy.
You have such calls in your code:
iPosb.doPOSBTransaction();
So, if unchecked exception (NPE for example) is thrown in this method and not caught - it's ultimately caught by container due to EJB proxy wrapping the call above. In this case transaction only could be rolled back.
Adding a call to a method of the same bean in your method (without using #EJB reference), does not change that:
#Override
public void doPOSBTransaction() {
try {
Config config4 = getConfig(4);
iConfigBean.create(config4);
if (true) {
newMethod();
}
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
System.out.println("--POSB Exception--");
}
if (true) {
newMethod();
}
}
private void newMethod(){
throw new RuntimeException();
}
You can easily check that commit/rollback behaviour is just the same in this case, no matter that a method is added to call stack.
So the important thing you have to remember is that all container tricks work only on #EJB calls. So, for example, it's pointless to place transactional annotation on a private method - it won't be used ever.
Another important point is about checked exceptions. By default these do not cause transaction rollback indeed. But it's still possible to annotate your checked exception like below to make it rollback ongoing transaction:
#ApplicationException(rollback = true)
I'd like to create configuration/bean to automatically start H2DB in my development profile. I'd like to have it running as a tcp server. It's needed to be started before any DataSource configuration. Can someone tell me how to achieve this?
Wha have I done is
#Profile("h2")
#Component
public class H2DbServerConfiguration implements SmartLifecycle {
private static final Logger logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(H2DbServerConfiguration.class);
private Server server;
#Override
public boolean isAutoStartup() {
return true;
}
#Override
public void stop(Runnable callback) {
stop();
new Thread(callback).start();
}
#Override
public void start() {
logger.debug("############################################");
logger.debug("############################################");
logger.debug("STARTING SERVER");
logger.debug("############################################");
logger.debug("############################################");
try {
server = Server.createTcpServer("-web", "-webAllowOthers", "-webPort", "8082").start();
} catch (SQLException e) {
throw new RuntimeException("Unable to start H2 server", e);
}
}
#Override
public void stop() {
logger.debug("############################################");
logger.debug("############################################");
logger.debug("STOPPING SERVER");
logger.debug("############################################");
logger.debug("############################################");
if (server != null)
if (server.isRunning(true))
server.stop();
}
#Override
public boolean isRunning() {
return server != null ? server.isRunning(true) : false;
}
#Override
public int getPhase() {
return 0;
}
}
but this isn't an option for me because component is created after datasource (I have liquibase setup so it's too late) and Phase is still the same that means FIFO order and I'd like to be FILO.
Mix #Profile and #Component seams to me a bad idea. Profiles are designed to work with Configuration (documentation)
Do you really need profile? In my opinion it makes sense if you have several possible configurations, one based on H2, and if you want be able to switch between these configurations (typically at start time by setting a properties...)
Manage the H2 server with a bean (documentation) seams correct to me (as suggested by Stefen). Maybe you will prefer annotations... If you want a spring profile, then you will need a Configuration object too. It will simply load the H2 server bean (in my opinion it's better to manage the H2 server lifecycle with a bean than with a context/config).
Create your server as a bean :
#Bean(initMethod = "start", destroyMethod = "stop")
Server h2Server() throws Exception {
return Server.createTcpServer("-tcp","-tcpAllowOthers","-tcpPort","9192");
}
Now you can configure spring to create other beans (e.g the datasource)
after the bean h2Server using #DependsOn
#DependsOn("h2Server")
#Bean
DataSource dataSource(){
...
}
Hi, what about using spring boot? It has automatically configured datasource so I don't want to reconfigure it.
You are right, to use the above approach you have to create your own datasource in order to annotate it with #DependsOn .
But it looks like this is not really necessary.
In one of my projects I am creating the h2Server as a bean as described.
I use the datasource created by spring, so without any #DependsOn.
It works perfectly. Just give it a try.
Your solution with SmartLifecycle does not work, because it creates the server on ApplicationContext refresh, which happens after all beans (including the datasource ) were created.
I'm having a problem with Dropwizard where I can't catch the exception thrown by the Hibernate DAO object within my resource.
I have the following DAO object
public class ApplicantDAO extends AbstractDAO<Applicant>
{
public ApplicantDAO(SessionFactory factory)
{
super(factory);
}
public long create(Applicant person)
{
return persist(person).getApplicantId();
}
}
I am calling the create method from inside my Dropwizard resource to which I'm passing on my managed DAO from my Application's run method. The following doesn't work:
try
{
long id = dao.create(applicant);
message += "[Stored: " + id + "] ";
}catch (HibernateException ex)
{
message +="Could't store: " + exptionToString(ex);
}
Instead I get Dropwizard's/Jersey's message:
{"code":500,"message":"There was an error processing your request. It has been logged (ID a785167e05024c69)."}
Is there a way to get around that?
I am not familiar with Drop Wizard.
But my best guest is that it has a JAX-RS ExcepionMapper registered that writes its own error when an exception is thrown
see : javax.ws.rs.ext.ExceptionMapper
I figured it out. The problem was happening because of an exception throw inside of a transaction.
So instead of having #UnitOfWork on my resource method, I added #UnitOfWork(transactional = false)
Then I was able to manage my own transactions by passing in the SessionFactory to my resource and that did the trick!
It might be related to the following issue: https://github.com/dropwizard/dropwizard/issues/949
Below is what I did, I need to implement rollback, using #transactional annotation, but not working as expected, what else need to be done for proper rollback to happen ?? I want that when the code is executed result in db should be "testingOne" , currently it is set to "notRollBacked". Can you please point my mistake.
public Response deleteUser(Request argVO)throws Exception
{
Users users = UsersLocalServiceUtil.getUsers("sagar");
users.setUserName("testingOne");
UsersLocalServiceUtil.updateUsers(users);
try
{
testRollbackFunction();
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
}
return new Response();
}
#Transactional(isolation = Isolation.PORTAL, rollbackFor =
{PortalException.class, SystemException.class})
private void testRollbackFunction() throws Exception
{
Users users = UsersLocalServiceUtil.getUsers("sagar");
users.setUserName("notRollbacked");
UsersLocalServiceUtil.updateUsers(users);
throw new PortalException();
}
****************Edit 1*************
I did what was mentioned in answers:
I did taken bean from context
and written a class/bean as
#Transactional(isolation = Isolation.PORTAL, rollbackFor =
{PortalException.class, SystemException.class})
public class RollBack
{
#Transactional(isolation = Isolation.PORTAL, rollbackFor =
{PortalException.class, SystemException.class})
public void thisWillRollBack() throws Exception
{
Users users = UsersLocalServiceUtil.getUsers("sagar");
users.setBarringReason("notRollbacked");
UsersLocalServiceUtil.updateUsers(users);
throw new PortalException();
}
}
spring xml file bean refrence set as :
<bean id="rollBackBean" class="com.alepo.RollBack">
</bean>
public Response myMethod(Request argVO)throws Exception
{
Users users = UsersLocalServiceUtil.getUsers("sagar");
users.setBarringReason("testingOne");
UsersLocalServiceUtil.updateUsers(users);
try
{
Test test = new Test();
Object obj = test.getBean();
RollBack rollBack = (RollBack)obj;
rollBack.thisWillRollBack();
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
ex.printStackTrace();
}
return new Response();
}
#################EDIT 4
now calling rollback function as :
RollBack rollBack = (RollBack)PortalBeanLocatorUtil.getBeanLocator().locate("rollBackBean");
rollBack.thisWillRollBack();
No Test class in picture now ...no new anywhere ...
still NOT WORKING .......
If you have a #Transactional annotation on method, Spring wraps the call to this method with aspect handling the transaction.
So:
1) Only public methodes can be wrapped in aspect
2) You call wrapped code only if you call the method on a bean taken from / injected by Spring container.
In your case:
1) The code isn't wrapped in transactional aspect because it is not public method
2) Event if it was, it is called directly from within the class, so you wouldn't call wrapped version anyway.
So the solution is to make separate bean with #Transactional method, inject it into and call it from Response class.
Of course you need <tx:annotation-driven/> in your spring-xml or instruct Spring otherwise to process #Transactional annotations (see the reference).
The issue is you are outside the application context. You are creating a new instance of a class, NEW is bad in Spring, very bad. Get an instance of Test from the application context, not by creating a new instance unless you start your application context in Test. Try to Autowire test in your class you mention above or inject it from Spring and then let me know, but the code you are showing above will never work with transaction management.
I want to catch bean instantiation exceptions in my code. What options do I have?
One way to do this is to use Java-based container configuration:
#Configuration
public class AppConfig {
#Bean
public SomeBean someBean() {
try {
return new SomeBean(); // throws SomeException
} catch(SomeException se) {
return new SomeBeanStub();
}
}
}
Is that possible to define exception handlers for bean instantiation using Spring using XML-based or annotation-based configuration?
Method someBean should catch SomeException and then throw BeanCreationException with SomeException as the cause:
#Configuration
public class AppConfig {
#Bean
public SomeBean someBean() {
try {
return new SomeBean(); // throws SomeException
} catch (SomeException se) {
throw new BeanCreationException("someBean", "Failed to create a SomeBean", se);
}
}
}
You are not suppose to do that. That is the whole point of having Spring create a bean for you. If you are to create your own beans using new (like above), why use Spring to create beans for you?
You can indeed allocate object for your self and work along instead of dependency injection and all.
Though I understand the essence behind the question. I think it is best if it fails during the server load time. Reason: The application wont be in an inconsistent state. Say suppose you catch the exception and do some cleanliness, but the other classes would be expecting for that bean to exist which it doesn't.
Hence best it fails at initialization so that the application is consistent. Though I do not know of any other legitimate way of doing.
Just for completeness.
You can also lazy init the bean and catch the exception the first time you use the bean.
spring config:
<bean id="a" class="A" lazy-init="true" />
In java:
import org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanCreationException;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired;
import org.springframework.context.annotation.Lazy;
public class B {
#Autowired
#Lazy
A a;
public void foo(){
try{
a.foo();
} catch (BeanCreationException e){
// ignore if you want
}
}
}
In case if you expect failures during bean creation and the bean is not mandatory for the rest of the application (pretty legitimate situation) you can do as you have suggested by catching all failure exceptions in the #Bean method body and returning null to indicate that the bean creation has failed.
The bean will not be added to the Spring application context in this case and the context construction will succeed in case if there are no mandatory dependencies on the given bean.