Develop Reference

UDP client does not receive bytes

This question has been asked a lot, but so far, none of the solutions that I applied from previous answers have helped me.
Main goal
I am trying to learn UDP conexions and this is my attempt. I want to have a client ask for a picture at a server via UDP and the server will send it. Then the client will create a file with that information given.
Explanation
My main idea is to ask the server for an image using a "GET" command (not the HTTP, just GET) followed by the name of the image(extension included). Then the client awaits an answer which is the image requested.
Problems
The client waits and answer which does no come
Research
From another similar question it was a problem that I was using the same PORT for both receive and connect, so I added two ports, receivingPORT and sendingPORT, no results from the Client.
From other similar questions, It was a Firewall problem. So, on a Win10 machine, I created a new rule for UDP in the Firewall for the ports that I am using for this application, and nothing was received by the Client...
I have checked that the image is loaded into byte[] and the image is sent. But on the Client, nothing is received and stays there waiting for a connection to come through
CODE from Server
public class UDPserver {
static DatagramSocket serverUDP;
static DatagramPacket packet;
static InetAddress address;
static byte[] buffer = new byte[65507];//65507
final static int receivingPORT = 6668;
final static int sendingPORT = 6669;
public static void main(String[] args) throws SocketException, IOException, InterruptedException{
boolean serverActive = true;
String order = "";
String file = "";
//Instantiate server
serverUDP = new DatagramSocket(receivingPORT);
while(serverActive){
//Kind of packet we want to receive
packet = new DatagramPacket(buffer, buffer.length);
System.out.println("Server awaiting connection...");
//Receive it
serverUDP.receive(packet);
System.out.println("Received packet from: " + packet.getAddress() + "/" + packet.getPort());
//What does the packet contain?
String msg = new String(packet.getData());
address = packet.getAddress();
System.out.println("Order from: " + address + "/" + receivingPORT + " says: " + msg);
try{
order = msg.split(" ")[0].trim();
file = msg.split(" ")[1].trim();
} catch (Exception e){
}
switch(order){
case("GET"):{
System.out.println("Sending back an image...");
buffer = loadImageFromServer(file);
packet = new DatagramPacket(buffer, buffer.length, address, sendingPORT);
Thread.sleep(5000);
serverUDP.send(packet);
System.out.println("Client served");
break;
}
case("DISCONNECT"):{
buffer = "Server is disconnecting...".getBytes();
packet = new DatagramPacket(buffer, buffer.length, address, sendingPORT);
serverUDP.send(packet);
serverActive = false;
serverUDP.close();
break;
}
}
}
}
static byte[] loadImageFromServer(String path) {
try {
System.out.println("Loading path: " + path);
//Instantiate a buffer from the image for it
BufferedImage img = ImageIO.read(UDPserver.class.getResource(path));
//Create a byte[] stream object to handle the data
ByteArrayOutputStream baos = new ByteArrayOutputStream();
//Write the image data into those above with jpg format
ImageIO.write(img, "png", baos);
//Flush the information
baos.flush();
byte[] buffer = baos.toByteArray(); //Write it out on a byte string and return it
return buffer;
} catch (IOException ex) {
Logger.getLogger(UDPserver.class.getName()).log(Level.SEVERE, null, ex.fillInStackTrace());
System.exit(-1);
}
return null;
}
}
CODE client
public class Client {
static DatagramSocket clientUDP;
static InetAddress address;
static DatagramPacket packetSend;
static DatagramPacket packetReceive;
static int SIZE = 65507;
final static int receivingPORT = 6669;
final static int sendingPORT = 6668;
static byte[] buffer = new byte[SIZE];
static Scanner scan = new Scanner(System.in);
public static void main(String[] args) throws SocketException, UnknownHostException, IOException{
boolean clientLoop = true;
//Get address
address = InetAddress.getByName("localhost");
//Instantiate Client -> UDP
clientUDP = new DatagramSocket();
while(clientLoop){
System.out.print("Enter any key and press enter");
scan.next(); //Just to stop the loop
//Load the buffer
buffer = "GET imagenServidor.png".getBytes();
//buffer = "DISCONNECT".getBytes();
System.out.println("Buffer is ready");
//Arm the packet
packetSend = new DatagramPacket(buffer, buffer.length, address, sendingPORT);
System.out.println("Packet is armed!");
//Send the packet to the server
clientUDP.send(packetSend);
System.out.println("Order sent to server");
System.out.println("Waiting an answer");
packetReceive = new DatagramPacket(buffer, buffer.length, address, receivingPORT);
clientUDP.receive(packetReceive);
System.out.println("Server answered!");
ByteArrayInputStream bais = new ByteArrayInputStream(packetReceive.getData());
BufferedImage image = ImageIO.read(bais);
System.out.println(image);
}
clientUDP.close();
}
}
NOTES
This is a UDP exercise

The Reason
MTU!
You are sending packets with long buffe through UDP directly, which may not work in most network circumstances.
A packet sent through UDP should not be longer than the network MTU, otherwise it would be dropped. The network MTU may not be more than 1500 on most net nods(routers/switchs/hosts...), and even smaller sometimes. Though some nods may do sigmentation for ip packets, but you should not count on it when you are using UDP.
Suggestions
Use TCP instead in this application, as for:
You are sending data which expected to be complete (otherwise it would be useless).
You do not care about congestion control algorithms.
So just go with TCP.
Edit Based on The Update of The Question
So, as this is an excercise, in which you have to use UDP only.
As a file might be useless unless it is complete, you have to make sure:
All packets are possible to pass the path. Which means network should be connected both physically and virtually, and packet size should always be smaller than the MTU.
If any packets are lost, both the receiver and the sender should be able to know.
If any apckets come out of order, the receiver should be able to know.
Sender should be able to cache and resend the packets which are not confirmed by the receiver yet.
Make sure your have a good network connection. Split the image buffer into buffer array with each buffer item length less than 1000bytes(should be safe).
Then let's design an amature but simple protocol for this:
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| type | sequence number |
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
| payload ... |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| ... |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
For types, we may need:
hello: 0x01
bye: 0x02
ack: 0x03
nack: 0x04
data: 0x05
feedback: 0x06
...
Sequence should be mono-increasing. e.g. 1, 2, 3, 4.... (Not necessory to start from 1 but OK)
It works like following:
Sender->Receiver: hello(seq=i)
Receiver->Sender: ack(seq=i)
# Sender->Receiver: hello(seq=i)
# if timeout and got no ack for seq=i
Sender->Receiver: data(seq=i+1)
Receiver->Sender: ack(seq=i+1)
# Sender->Receiver: hello(seq=i+1)
# if timeout and got no ack for seq=i+1
Sender->Receiver: data(seq=i+2)
Sender->Receiver: data(seq=i+3)
Receiver->Sender: ack(seq=i+2)
Receiver->Sender: ack(seq=i+3)
# Sender->Receiver: hello(seq=i+2)
# if timeout and got no ack for seq=i+2 or got nack for seq=i+2
Sender->Receiver: bye(seq=n)
Receiver->Sender: ack(seq=n)
# bye is not necessory

Firstly, I think you need to learn how to use wirshark or tcmpdump to analysis network streams when debugging, that will help you find out the problem and solve it.
As for your program, there are several problems the user207421 has mensioned. I think it's better to use TCP, but if you want to learn UDP by this way, the thing you need is to do a slim reliable UDP by yourself.
For example, you may need the following models
Build a send buffer and recive buffer, check every time if the buffer is empty, if not, send/receive and process it.（Cause UDP has MTU）
Add some extra format of information in the head of each datagram, which includes the size of the whole message, the sequence of the datagram, the left size, etc.(Cause you need to cut your message into many parts)
Build a controller, which need to have some function like retransmission, rebuild the message, etc.(Cause UDP is unreliable, you need to check the completeness of all parts)
Hope that can help you.

How to create IPC through sockets with a Java client and a Python server?

I am trying to make two processes communicate through local sockets: a Python server and a Java client. The data I want to pass between both consists of the bytes of a Protobuf object, with variable size. I want the connection to remain open and be used until the end of the program, because I'm passing a lot of objects that need to be processed.
Because Protobuf objects have variable size, I am sending the size of the message/response before sending the true message/response containing the object.
Currently, I am using a TCPServer from the socketserver library on the Python side. I have the following handler implemented:
class MyTCPHandler(socketserver.BaseRequestHandler):
"""
The request handler class for our server.
It is instantiated once per connection to the server, and must
override the handle() method to implement communication to the
client.
"""
def recv_all(self, n):
# Helper function to recv n bytes or return None if EOF is hit
data = b''
while len(data) < n:
packet = self.request.recv(n - len(data))
if not packet:
return None
data += packet
return data
def handle(self):
logger.debug("Beginning of handle cycle for client: {}.".format(self.client_address))
while True:
if True: # please disregard this if condition
# Receive 4 bytes (1 int) denoting the size of the message
data_length_bytes: bytes = self.recv_all(4)
logger.debug('Received data_length: {}'.format(data_length_bytes))
# If recv read an empty request b'', then client has closed the connection
if not data_length_bytes:
break
data_length: int = int.from_bytes(data_length_bytes.strip(), byteorder='big')
data: bytes = self.recv_all(data_length).strip()
response: bytes = data.upper()
# Send length of response first
self.request.sendall(len(response).to_bytes(4, byteorder='big'))
# Send response
self.request.sendall(response)
logger.debug(
'Sent response to: {}. Size of response: {} bytes. Response: {}.'.format(self.client_address,
len(response),
response))
logger.debug("End of handle cycle for client: {}.".format(self.client_address))
And the following client:
class SocketClient
{
private static Socket socket;
private int port;
private DataOutputStream out;
private DataInputStream in;
SocketClient(int port)
{
this.port = port;
this.createSocket();
}
private void createSocket() {
InetAddress address;
try {
address = InetAddress.getByName("localhost");
socket = new Socket(address, port);
this.out = new DataOutputStream(socket.getOutputStream());
this.in = new DataInputStream(socket.getInputStream());
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
byte[] sendMessageAndReceiveResponse(byte[] messageToSend){
try {
if(true) { // again, please disregard this condition
//Send the size of the message to the server
this.out.writeInt(messageToSend.length);
out.flush();
this.out.write(messageToSend);
out.flush();
//Get the response message from the server
int length = in.readInt(); // read length of incoming message
byte[] buffer = null;
if(length>=0) {
buffer = new byte[length];
in.readFully(buffer, 0, buffer.length); // read the message
}
return buffer;
}
}
catch (ConnectException exception) {
System.out.println("ATTENTION! Could not connect to socket. Nothing was retrieved from the Python module.");
exception.printStackTrace();
return null;
}
catch (Exception exception)
{
exception.printStackTrace();
return null;
}
}
void close(){
//Closing the socket
try
{
in.close();
out.close();
socket.close();
}
catch(Exception e)
{
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
I run the following experiment after starting the Python server:
SocketClient socketClient = new SocketClient(5000);
byte[] response;
// Case 1
response = socketClient.sendMessageAndReceiveResponse("12345678".getBytes());
System.out.println(new String(response));
// Case 2
response = socketClient.sendMessageAndReceiveResponse("123456781".getBytes());
System.out.println(new String(response));
// Case 3
response = socketClient.sendMessageAndReceiveResponse("12345678123456781".getBytes());
System.out.println(new String(response));
socketClient.close();
Case 1 and case 3 work well. However, when I run case 2, on the Python server side, I get the following log:
DEBUG -- [handle()] Received data_length: b'\x00\x00\x00\t' # The '\t' shouldn't be here. A '\x09' should.
And then the server throws and exception and exits the connection. This happens with every string with 8 < length < 14. What am I doing wrong, and is there an easier way to achieve what I want?

I figured out why I was having problems with messages of 8 < length < 14.
I was getting the \t character when length was equal to 9. I noticed that if I changed the length to 10, it would become \n. And to 13, \r. I realized that there wasn't any \t magically appearing. Python was for some reason converting \x09 to \t, because the horizontal tab character \t has an ASCII code equal to 9!
And when I applied the strip() function in this line:
data_length: int = int.from_bytes(data_length_bytes.strip(), byteorder='big')
, Python deleted my \t, which was actually my \x09. My problem was logging the value before stripping it, and so I took a long time to figure out my mistake.
Therefore the solution was to simply not use strip(). I leave here my current working code (at least for my tests), for someone to use:
Python server handler:
class MyTCPHandler(socketserver.BaseRequestHandler):
"""
The request handler class for our server.
It is instantiated once per connection to the server, and must
override the handle() method to implement communication to the
client.
"""
def recv_all(self, n):
# Helper function to recv n bytes or return None if EOF is hit
data = b''
while len(data) < n:
packet = self.request.recv(n - len(data))
if not packet:
return None
data += packet
return data
def handle(self):
while True:
data_length_bytes: bytes = self.recv_all(4)
# If recv read an empty request b'', then client has closed the connection
if not data_length_bytes:
break
# DON'T DO strip() ON THE DATA_LENGTH PACKET. It might delete what Python thinks is whitespace but
# it actually is a byte that makes part of the integer.
data_length: int = int.from_bytes(data_length_bytes, byteorder='big')
# Don't do strip() on data either (be sure to check if there is some error if you do use)
data: bytes = self.recv_all(data_length)
response: bytes = data.upper()
self.request.sendall(len(response).to_bytes(4, byteorder='big'))
self.request.sendall(response)
The Java client remained the same, but without that if(true) condition that I was using for debug reasons.

Socket giving incorrect response [duplicate]

I want to connect Android Device to external device via Socket. Socket Connect to external device successfully.
Now if any data require from external device then send request of byte packet data to socket below order. if external device receive data correct then send byte data in response.
Parameters : methodname(1 byte), payloadlength(2 byte), payload(2 byte).
Now My Code is...
Socket socket = new Socket("local exteranl device ip", 5000);
if(socket.isConnected()) {
int methodname = 5;
int payload = 2151;
int payloadLength = 2;
ByteBuffer buffer = ByteBuffer.allocate(3 + payloadLength); // 3 = for method name + length
buffer.order(ByteOrder.BIG_ENDIAN); // Just to be explicit
buffer.put((byte) methodname);
buffer.putShort((short) payloadLength);
buffer.putShort((short) payload);
buffer.rewind();
byte[] result = new byte[buffer.capacity()]; // Could also use result = buffer.array();
buffer.get(result);
DataOutputStream classOUTstream = new DataOutputStream(socket.getOutputStream());
// socket is already connected
classOUTstream.write(result);
classOUTstream.flush();
InputStream stream = socket.getInputStream();
byte[] data = new byte[100];
int count = stream.read(data);
}
Above Code is Android, i knowing only basic concept of java. i am getting -1 result in count.
can any one please suggest me or tell me my mistake?

You're doing this the hard way. Get rid of the ByteBuffer altogether and use all the methods of DataOutputStream. They are all big-endian. I can't see any mistake but clearly you must be sending something the peer didn't understand so he is closing the connection instead of sending a reply.
Note: Socket.isConnected() cannot possibly be false at the point you're testing it.

Java client and a C++ server send and receive via TCP Socket

I have a C++ server and two clients (ruby and java).
Everything is running on a 64-bit linux-machine (java 1.7.0_17)
The ruby client is fully working, but the java version makes problems.
In Java I tried to send a String from the client to the server. Actually the Server received the entire String, but the server thinks there is still something more to receive.
The ruby client looks a little bit like this:
socket = TCPSocket.open(#options[:host],#options[:port])
test = "Hello, World"
socket.puts test
socket.shutdown 1
response = socket.gets
Everything here is working fine. The ruby client sends a string. The server receives that string and sends a reply.
The Java Version looks like:
String ip = "127.0.0.1";
int port = 6686;
java.net.Socket socket = new java.net.Socket(ip,port);
OutputStreamWriter out = new OutputStreamWriter(socket.getOutputStream());
InputStreamReader in = new InputStreamReader(socket.getInputStream());
String msg = "Hello, world!";
//send
PrintWriter pw = new PrintWriter(out, true);
pw.print(msg);
pw.flush();
// I also tried: out.write(msg); out.flush(); nothing changed
//receive the reply
BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(in);
char[] buffer = new char[300];
int count = br.read(buffer, 0, 300);
String reply = new String(buffer, 0, count);
System.out.println(reply);
socket.close();
On the other side there is a C++ Server:
string receive(int SocketFD) {
char buffer[SOCKET_BUFFER_SIZE];
int recv_count;
// empty messagestring
string message = "";
// empty buffer
memset(buffer, 0, sizeof(buffer));
while ((recv_count = recv(SocketFD, buffer, sizeof(buffer) - 1, 0)) > 0) {
/*if (recv_count == -1) {
cout << "failed." << endl;
break;
}*/
cout << recv_count << endl;
if (ECHO_SOCKETS) cout << "received: " << buffer << endl;
message.append(buffer);
memset(buffer, 0, sizeof(buffer));
if (ECHO_SOCKETS) cout << "message is now: " << message << endl;
}
return message;
}
The server output from the Java-message is:
13
received: Hello, world!
message is now: Hello, world!
and then nothing happens.
The problem is that:
recv(SocketFD, buffer, sizeof(buffer) - 1, 0)
is catched in an endless loop (or something like that).
If I kill the Java-client process or I type something like:
pw.print(msg);
out.close();
the output on the server side is:
_sending reply: "Request unrecognized/invalid" request="Hello, world!"
send reply success
now close connection
This output is right (except "send reply success"), but in case of adding:
out.close();
the client can't receive the reply of the server. Because the Socket is closed.
java.net.SocketException: Socket is closed
at java.net.Socket.getInputStream(Socket.java:864)
at MyServer.writeMessage(MyServer.java:56)
at MyServer.test(MyServer.java:42)
at MyServer.main(MyServer.java:30)
Edit
I tried to call pw.flush(); and different delimiters like "\n", "\r", "\r\n" and "\n\r" but the server still thinks there is still something to read. I also tried to use DatagramSockets:
java.net.DatagramSocket dSocket = new java.net.DatagramSocket();
InetAddress address = InetAddress.getByName("localhost");
String msg = "Hello, world!";
byte[] buf = msg.getBytes();
java.net.DatagramPacket packet = new DatagramPacket(buf, buf.length, address, 6686);
But the server can't accept the packet.
Solution
The ruby-client does something like a socket.shutdownOutput(); (ruby: socket.shutdown 1) after the call of puts. I changed the java-client-code:
out.write(msg);
socket.shutdownOutput();
and it works!
As #Charly said: I have to define a "protocol". In my case I'm not allowed to change any communication related code (in the server and the ruby-client) because this functionality is used by a another group of researchers. So I've to modify my java-client in that way, that it does the exact same things at the exact same time as the ruby-client (something like a protocol).

PrintWriter buffer (when autoflush is true) is only flushed by calling println or printf. Calling print may not flush the buffer (Javadoc). Try calling println or use a OutputStreamWriter directly and flush().
Be aware of using the right charset (You can set it up in OutputStreamWriter constructor).

Close the stream respectively flush it in a way like this:
DataOutputStream dataOut = new DataOutputStream(socket.getOutputStream());
dataOut.writeUTF(s);
dataOut.flush();

while ((recv_count = recv(SocketFD, buffer, sizeof(buffer) - 1, 0)) > 0) {
if (recv_count == -1) {
I don't know what your problem is but this code is certainly nonsense. It is impossible for the inner test ever to succeed.

Java server socket communication is VERY slow

Local on Linux. It's about 10 seconds for a 20k message. My guess is my Java is bad and Python is fine.
py client:
def scan(self, msg):
try:
print 'begin scan'
HOST = 'localhost'
PORT = 33000
s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
s.connect((HOST, PORT));
s.sendall(msg)
data = s.recv(1024)
s.close()
print 'Received', repr(data)
except Exception, e:
print "error: " + str(e)
Java server:
ServerSocket service = new ServerSocket(33000);
while(true) {
debug("Begin waiting for connection");
//this spins
Socket connection = service.accept();
debug("Connection received from " + connection.getInetAddress().getHostName());
OutputStreamWriter out = new OutputStreamWriter(connection.getOutputStream());
BufferedInputStream in = new BufferedInputStream(connection.getInputStream());
ScanResultsHeader results = new ScanResultsHeader();
Scanner scanner = new Scanner();
results = scanner.scan("scannerfake#gmail.com", "123", in);
and
public ScanResultsHeader scan (String userEmail,
String imapRetrievalId,
BufferedInputStream mimeEmail)
throws IOException, FileNotFoundException, MimeException, ScannerException {
//how fast would it be to just slurp up stream?
debug("slurp!");
String slurp = IOUtils.toString(mimeEmail);
debug("slurped " + slurp.length() + " characters");
slurp = slurp.toLowerCase();
debug("lc'ed it");
//...
My guess is I'm juggling the input streams wrong. One catch is the "BufferedInputStream mimeEmail" signature is required by the library API scan is using, so I'll need to get to that form eventually. But I noticed the simple act of slurping up a string takes ludicrously long so I'm already doing something incorrect.

Revising my answer....
If you are reading efficiently, and it appears you are, it will only be taking a lot time because either
You are creating a new connection every time you send a message which can be very expensive.
You are not sending the data as fast as you think.
The message is very large (unlikely but it could be)
There are plenty of examples on how to do this and a good library you can use is IOUtils which makes it simpler.
You should be able to send about 200K/s messages over a single socket in Java.
If you have a sends X bytes protocol using Big Endian you can do this.
DataInputStream dis = new DataInputStream( ...
int len = dis.readInt();
byte[] bytes = new byte[len];
dis.readFully(bytes);
String text = new String(bytes, "UTF-8");

Original problem was that the client isn't sending an end-of-input so the "slurp" operation keeps waiting for more stuff to cross the connection.
Solution was to implement an application-layer protocol to send the size of the message in advance, then stop listening for more message after that many bytes. I would have preferred a standard library -- something like, FiniteInputStream extends BufferedInputStream and takes a size as an argument, but wrote my own.