Ok so i am new to these HashMaps but have some idea about LinkedLists and HashMaps.
It would be great if you could give me some simple explanation regarding LinkedHashMap and as in the titile does this mean we are explicitly defining it to be of some type?
A LinkedHashMap is a combination of
hash table and linked list. It has a
predictable iteration order (a la
linked list), yet the retrieval speed
is that of a HashMap. The order of the
iteration is determined by the
insertion order, so you will get the
key/values back in the order that they
were added to this Map. You have to be
a bit careful here, since re-inserting
a key does not change the original
order.
k stand for Key and v for Value.
/*
Simple Java LinkedHashMap example
This simple Java Example shows how to use Java LinkedHashMap.
It also describes how to add something to LinkedHashMap and how to
retrieve the value added from LinkedHashMap.
*/
import java.util.LinkedHashMap;
public class JavaLinkedHashMapExample {
public static void main(String[] args) {
//create object of LinkedHashMap
LinkedHashMap lHashMap = new LinkedHashMap();
/*
Add key value pair to LinkedHashMap using
Object put(Object key, Object value) method of Java LinkedHashMap class,
where key and value both are objects
put method returns Object which is either the value previously tied
to the key or null if no value mapped to the key.
*/
lHashMap.put("One", new Integer(1));
lHashMap.put("Two", new Integer(2));
/*
Please note that put method accepts Objects. Java Primitive values CAN NOT
be added directly to LinkedHashMap. It must be converted to corrosponding
wrapper class first.
*/
//retrieve value using Object get(Object key) method of Java LinkedHashMap class
Object obj = lHashMap.get("One");
System.out.println(obj);
/*
Please note that the return type of get method is an Object. The value must
be casted to the original class.
*/
}
}
/*
Output of the program would be
1
*/
It is a hybrid of two data structures, a LinkedList, where insertion order is preserved by adding elements to the end of a list of nodes which have access to their immediate neighbours, and a HashMap, or a Map that uses an array of bucket Lists, where a modulus division remainder of the key's hashcode() determines the starting bucket to query for the equals() method of the keys that lie in that bucket's list of contents.
The advantage is that you can walk the existing elements in a HashMap in order of insertion, due to the LinkedList nature, and you can quickly jump to the correct bucket in a key lookup (saving a lot of time for a large collection) if you have the key of the element.
This is called generics. k and v must be replaced with the actual type you want to store.
To create a HashMap that maps integers on strings you would write:
LinkedHashMap<Integer,String>
LinkedHashMap keys are similar to ArrayLists or arrays in the way they are stored in the order that they are inserted.
Normal HashMaps are sorted by their hash code.
k = key
v = value
They can be any type.
The biggest difference is LinkedHashMap is ordered. If you use an iterator the keys and values will be in the same order they were added to the map. HashMap has no guarantee of the order they are returned.
Read about Generics in Java on Wikipedia.
Related
I am using ArrayMap for first time in my project and I thought it works just like an array. I expected when I use .put method it inserts it at next index.
But in my case this is not true - after I added all elements one by one the first element I added ended up at index 4 which is kind of strange.
Here are the first three steps which I add elements:
1 - Salads:
2 - Soups:
3 - Appetizers:
So somehow on second step "Soup" element was inserted in index 0 instead of 1 as I was expecting, but strangely on third step "Appetizers" was inserted as expected after "Soup".
This is the code I am using to push key and value pair:
function ArrayMap<String, DMType> addElement(String typeKey, DMType type) {
ArrayMap<String, DMType> types = new ArrayMap<>();
types.put(typeKey, type);
return types;
}
Am I missing something about the behavior of ArrayMap?
Yeah it is misleading because of the name but ArrayMap does no gurantee order unlike arrays.
ArrayMap is a generic key->value mapping data structure that is
designed to be more memory efficient than a traditional HashMap.
ArrayMap is actually a Map:
public class ArrayMap extends SimpleArrayMap implements Map
If you want the Map functionality with order guranteed use LinkedHashMap instead.
LinkedHashMap defines the iteration ordering, which is normally the
order in which keys were inserted into the map (insertion-order).
documentation
I thought it works just like an array
No, it works like a map, because it is a map. It is similar to a HashMap, but more memory efficient for smaller data sets.
It's order shouldn't and doesn't matter. Under the hood, it is implemented using
an array which has an order since arrays do. This inherently gives the ArrayMap an order, but that is not part of it's API anyway. Just like which memory slot your Java objects are in, you shouldn't care about the order here either.
It doesn't work as an array, I don't see Array in the name but Map and the documentation clearly states that behaves as a generic key->value mapping, more efficient (memory wise) than traditional HashMap implementation.
Actually I don't see why you care about the order compared to the insertion one. Data is private inside the class and you have no way to obtain the element by the index, so you are basically wondering about a private implementation which is irrelevant for its usage.
If you really want to understand how it stores its data you should take a look at the source code.
ArrayMap does NOT work like an Array, instead, it works like a HashMap with performance optimizations.
The internal sequence of the key-value pair is not guaranteed as it is NOT part of the contract.
In your case, what you really want to use is probably an ArrayList<Element>, where the Element class is defined like this:
public class Element{
private final String typeKey;
private final DMType type;
public Element(String typeKey, DMType type){
this.typeKey = typeKey;
this.type = type;
}
}
If you don't want a new Class just to store the result, and you want to keep the sequence, you can use a LinkedHashMap<String, DMType>. As the document specifies:
Class LinkedHashMap
Hash table and linked list implementation of the Map interface, with predictable iteration order. This implementation differs from HashMap in that it maintains a doubly-linked list running through all of its entries. This linked list defines the iteration ordering, which is normally the order in which keys were inserted into the map (insertion-order). Note that insertion order is not affected if a key is re-inserted into the map. (A key k is reinserted into a map m if m.put(k, v) is invoked when m.containsKey(k) would return true immediately prior to the invocation.)
I'm having some trouble when using .put(Integer, String) in Java.
To my understanding, when a collision happens the HashMap asks whether the to value are the same with .equals(Object) and if they are not the two values are stored in a LinkedList. Nevertheless, size() is 1 and the hash iterator only shows one result, the last one.
Apart form this, java HashMap API states:put
public V put(K key, V value)
Associates the specified value with the specified key in this map. If
the map previously contained a mapping for the key, the old value is
replaced.
THIS IS NOT WHAT I HAVE READ EVERYWHERE.
Thoughts?
public class HashProblema {
public static void main(String[] args) {
HashMap<Integer, String> hash= new HashMap();
hash.put(1, "sdaaaar");
hash.put(1, "bjbh");
System.out.println(hash.size());
for (Object value : hash.values()) {
System.out.println(value);
}
}
}
The output is -:
1
bjbh
Since the mapping for the key exist, it is replaced and the size remains 1 only.
The value gets over written by the new key..the size remains one and the value gets changed..This is how it works, as key values are always unique..You can't map multiple values on 1 key.
The API is the definitive reference and that is what you must believe.
A collision occurs when the hash of of a key already exists in the HashMap. Then the values of the keys are compared, and if they are the different, the entries are placed in a linked list. If the keys are the same, then the old key-value in the HashMap is overwritten.
API documentation should normally be treated as authoritative unless there is very good reason to doubt its accuracy.
You should almost certainly ignore any claim that doesn't flag itself as 'knowingly' at odds with documentation and provide a testable evidence.
I humbly suggest you might be confused about the role of a linked 'collision' list. As it happens HashMap in Java uses a linked-list to store multiple values for which the hash-code of the key is placed in the same 'bucket' as one or more other keys.
A HashMap in Java will always store a Key-Value-Pair. There are no linked lists involved. What you are describing is the general idea of a hash map (often taught in computer science class), but the implementation in Java is different. Here, you will always have one value per key only (the last one you put in that place).
However, you are free to define a HashMap that contains List objects. Though, you have to keep track of duplicates and collisions on your own then
In java, List and Map are using in collections. But i couldn't understand at which situations we should use List and which time use Map. What is the major difference between both of them?
Now would be a good time to read the Java collections tutorial - but fundamentally, a list is an ordered sequence of elements which you can access by index, and a map is a usually unordered mapping from keys to values. (Some maps preserve insertion order, but that's implementation-specific.)
It's usually fairly obvious when you want a key/value mapping and when you just want a collection of elements. It becomes less clear if the key is part of the value, but you want to be able to get at an item by that key efficiently. That's still a good use case for a map, even though in some senses you don't have a separate collection of keys.
There's also Set, which is a (usually unordered) collection of distinct elements.
Map is for Key:Value pair kind of data.for instance if you want to map student roll numbers to their names.
List is for simple ordered collection of elements which allow duplicates.
for instance to represent list of student names.
Map Interface
A Map cares about unique identifiers. You map a unique key (the ID) to a specific
value, where both the key and the value are, of course, objects.
The Map implementations let you do things like search for a
value based on the key, ask for a collection of just the values, or ask for a collection
of just the keys. Like Sets, Maps rely on the equals() method to determine whether
two keys are the same or different.
List Interface
A List cares about the index. The one thing that List has that non-lists don't have
is a set of methods related to the index. Those key methods include things like
get(int index), indexOf(Object o), add(int index, Object obj), and so
on. All three List implementations are ordered by index position—a position that
you determine either by setting an object at a specific index or by adding it without
specifying position, in which case the object is added to the end.
list is a linked list, where every object is connected to the next one via pointers. the time it takes to insert a new object to the list is O(1) but the rest of operations on it take longer.
the good thing about it is that it takes exactly the amount of memory you need and not even on byte more than that.
Maps are a data structure that has an array and each entry to the array is calculated with a hashFunction(key) that calculates the location according to the key. almost every operation in a Map taks O(1) (except inserting when there are 2 identical keys) but the space complexity is fairly large.
for more reading try wikipedia's HashMap and linked list
HashList is a data structure storing objects in a hash table and a list.it is a combination of hashmap and doubly linked list. acess will be faster. HashMap is hash table implementation of map interface it is same as HashTable except that it is unsynchronized and allow null values. List is an ordered collection and it allow nulls and duplicates in it. positional acess is possible. Set is a collection that doesn't allow duplicates, it may allow at most one null element. same as our mathematical set.
List is just an ordered collectiom(a sequence). Check this list documentation .You can access elements by their integer index (position in the list), and search for elements in the list.
Also lists allow duplicate elements and multiple NULL elements.
Map is an object that maps the values to the keys. Check this map documentation. A map cannot contain duplicate keys; each key can map to at most one value.
List - This datastructure is used to contain list of elements.
In case you need list of elements and the list may contain duplicate values,
then you have to use List.
Map - It contains data as key value pair. When you have to store data
in key value pair,so that latter you can retrieve data using the key,
you have to use Map data structure.
List implementation - ArrayList, LinkedList
Map implementation - HashMap, TreeMap
In comparison HashMap to ArrayList -
A hash map is the fastest data structure if you want to get all nodes for a page. The list of nodes can be fetched in constant time (O(1)) while with lists the time is O(n) (n=number of pages, faster on sorted lists but never getting near O(1))
Apart from the fact that HashSet does not allow duplicate values, what is the difference between HashMap and HashSet?
I mean implementation wise? It's a little bit vague because both use hash tables to store values.
HashSet is a set, e.g. {1,2,3,4,5}
HashMap is a key -> value (key to value) map, e.g. {a -> 1, b -> 2, c -> 2, d -> 1}
Notice in my example above that in the HashMap there must not be duplicate keys, but it may have duplicate values.
In the HashSet, there must be no duplicate elements.
They are entirely different constructs. A HashMap is an implementation of Map. A Map maps keys to values. The key look up occurs using the hash.
On the other hand, a HashSet is an implementation of Set. A Set is designed to match the mathematical model of a set. A HashSet does use a HashMap to back its implementation, as you noted. However, it implements an entirely different interface.
When you are looking for what will be the best Collection for your purposes, this Tutorial is a good starting place. If you truly want to know what's going on, there's a book for that, too.
HashSet
HashSet class implements the Set interface
In HashSet, we store objects(elements or values)
e.g. If we have a HashSet of string elements then it could depict a
set of HashSet elements: {“Hello”, “Hi”, “Bye”, “Run”}
HashSet does not allow duplicate elements that mean you
can not store duplicate values in HashSet.
HashSet permits to have a single null value.
HashSet is not synchronized which means they are not suitable for thread-safe operations until unless synchronized explicitly.[similarity]
add contains next notes
HashSet O(1) O(1) O(h/n) h is the table
HashMap
HashMap class implements the Map interface
HashMap is
used for storing key & value pairs. In short, it maintains the
mapping of key & value (The HashMap class is roughly equivalent to
Hashtable, except that it is unsynchronized and permits nulls.) This
is how you could represent HashMap elements if it has integer key
and value of String type: e.g. {1->”Hello”, 2->”Hi”, 3->”Bye”,
4->”Run”}
HashMap does not allow duplicate keys however it allows having duplicate values.
HashMap permits single null key and any number of null values.
HashMap is not synchronized which means they are not suitable for thread-safe operations until unless synchronized explicitly.[similarity]
get containsKey next Notes
HashMap O(1) O(1) O(h/n) h is the table
Please refer this article to find more information.
It's really a shame that both their names start with Hash. That's the least important part of them. The important parts come after the Hash - the Set and Map, as others have pointed out. What they are, respectively, are a Set - an unordered collection - and a Map - a collection with keyed access. They happen to be implemented with hashes - that's where the names come from - but their essence is hidden behind that part of their names.
Don't be confused by their names; they are deeply different things.
The Hashset Internally implements HashMap. If you see the internal implementation the values inserted in HashSet are stored as keys in the HashMap and the value is a Dummy object of Object class.
Difference between HashMap vs HashSet is:-
HashMap contains key value pairs and each value can be accessed by key where as HashSet needs to be iterated everytime as there is no get method.
HashMap implements Map interface and allows one null value as a key and multiple null values as values, whereas HashSet implements Set interface, allows only one null value and no duplicated values.(Remeber one null key is allowed in HashMap key hence one null value in HashSet as HashSet implemements HashMap internally).
HashSet and HashMap do not maintain the order of insertion while iterating.
HashSet allows us to store objects in the set where as HashMap allows us to store objects on the basis of key and value. Every object or stored object will be having key.
As the names imply, a HashMap is an associative Map (mapping from a key to a value), a HashSet is just a Set.
Differences between HashSet and HashMap in Java
1) First and most significant difference between HashMap and HashSet is that HashMap is an implementation of Map interface while HashSet is an implementation of Set interface, which means HashMap is a key value based data-structure and HashSet guarantees uniqueness by not allowing duplicates.In reality HashSet is a wrapper around HashMap in Java, if you look at the code of add(E e) method of HashSet.java you will see following code :
public boolean add(E e)
{
return map.put(e, PRESENT)==null;
}
where its putting Object into map as key and value is an final object PRESENT which is dummy.
2) Second difference between HashMap and HashSet is that , we use add() method to put elements into Set but we use put() method to insert key and value into HashMap in Java.
3) HashSet allows only one null key, but HashMap can allow one null key + multiple null values.
That's all on difference between HashSet and HashMap in Java. In summary HashSet and HashMap are two different type of Collection one being Set and other being Map.
Differences between HashSet and HashMap in Java
HashSet internally uses HashMap to store objects.when add(String) method called it calls HahsMap put(key,value) method where key=String object & value=new Object(Dummy).so it maintain no duplicates because keys are nothing but Value Object.
the Objects which are stored as key in Hashset/HashMap should override hashcode & equals contract.
Keys which are used to access/store value objects in HashMap should declared as Final because when it is modified Value object can't be located & returns null.
A HashMap is to add, get, remove, ... objects indexed by a custom key of any type.
A HashSet is to add elements, remove elements and check if elements are present by comparing their hashes.
So a HashMap contains the elements and a HashSet remembers their hashes.
A HashSet uses a HashMap internally to store its entries. Each entry in the internal HashMap is keyed by a single Object, so all entries hash into the same bucket. I don't recall what the internal HashMap uses to store its values, but it doesn't really matter since that internal container will never contain duplicate values.
EDIT: To address Matthew's comment, he's right; I had it backwards. The internal HashMap is keyed with the Objects that make up the Set elements. The values of the HashMap are an Object that's just simply stored in the HashMap buckets.
Differences:
with respect to heirarchy:
HashSet implements Set.
HashMap implements Map and stores a mapping of keys and values.
A use of HashSet and HashMap with respect to database would help you understand the significance of each.
HashSet: is generally used for storing unique collection objects.
E.g: It might be used as implementation class for storing many-to-one relation ship between
class Item and Class Bid where (Item has many Bids)
HashMap: is used to map a key to value.the value may be null or any Object /list of Object (which is object in itself).
A HashSet is implemented in terms of a HashMap. It's a mapping between the key and a PRESENT object.
HashMap is a Map implementation, allowing duplicate values but not duplicate keys.. For adding an object a Key/Value pair is required. Null Keys and Null values are allowed. eg:
{The->3,world->5,is->2,nice->4}
HashSet is a Set implementation,which does not allow duplicates.If you tried to add a duplicate object, a call to public boolean add(Object o) method, then the set remains unchanged and returns false. eg:
[The,world,is,nice]
Basically in HashMap, user has to provide both Key and Value, whereas in HashSet you provide only Value, the Key is derived automatically from Value by using hash function. So after having both Key and Value, HashSet can be stored as HashMap internally.
HashSet and HashMap both store pairs , the difference lies that in HashMap you can specify a key while in HashSet the key comes from object's hash code
HashMaps allow one null key and null values. They are not synchronized, which increases efficiency. If it is required, you can make them synchronized using Collections.SynchronizedMap()
Hashtables don't allow null keys and are synchronized.
The main difference between them you can find as follows:
HashSet
It does not allow duplicate keys.
Even it is not synchronized, so this will have better performance.
It allows a null key.
HashSet can be used when you want to maintain a unique list.
HashSet implements Set interface and it is backed by the hash table(actually HashMap instance).
HashSet stores objects.
HashSet doesn’t allow duplicate elements but null values are allowed.
This interface doesn’t guarantee that order will remain constant over time.
HashMap
It allows duplicate keys.
It is not synchronized, so this will have better performance.
HashMap does not maintain insertion order.
The order is defined by the Hash function.
It is not Thread Safe
It allows null for both key and value.
It allows one null key and as many null values as you like.
HashMap is a Hash table-based implementation of the Map interface.
HashMap store object as key and value pair.
HashMap does not allow duplicate keys but null keys and values are allowed.
Ordering of the element is not guaranteed overtime.
EDIT - this answer isn't correct. I'm leaving it here in case other people have a similar idea. b.roth and justkt have the correct answers above.
--- original ---
you pretty much answered your own question - hashset doesn't allow duplicate values. it would be trivial to build a hashset using a backing hashmap (and just a check to see if the value already exists). i guess the various java implementations either do that, or implement some custom code to do it more efficiently.
HashMap is a implementation of Map interface
HashSet is an implementation of Set Interface
HashMap Stores data in form of key value pair
HashSet Store only objects
Put method is used to add element in map
Add method is used to add element is Set
In hash map hashcode value is calculated using key object
Here member object is used for calculating hashcode value which can be same for two objects so equal () method is used to check for equality if it returns false that means two objects are different.
HashMap is faster than hashset because unique key is used to access object
HashSet is slower than Hashmap
So i have a map that i created (inserted data) in an order i wanted.
When parsing the map the 1st key returned in foreach is not the first key i inserted.
Is there a way for that to happen?
Also sorting my map is kinda tricky cause it has to be sorted by Value and in specific field within the Value.
Ty
Check out LinkedHashMap for a Map implementation with predictable iteration order. You also might consider just using a List if you're not actually doing lookup by keys.
Let's see. Your requirements seem to be:
You have a set of key / value pairs, where the keys are unique.
You want to be able to do fast lookup of the value for a given key.
You want to be able to iterate over the keys (or pairs) in insertion order.
You want to be able to iterate over the values in order of some field of the value type.
There is no single standard Java collection class that satisfies all of these requirements. And I don't think that Commons collections or Google collections would either ...
If you were to throw out requirement 3, then a TreeSet (instantiated with a custom Comparator) would do the job. If you were to throw out requirement 4, then a LinkedHashMap would do the job.
To satisfy all requirements you need to do one of the following:
Use a LinkedHashMap, and when you want to iterate in some order dependent on the values extract the map's values collection, sort it using your custom comparator, and
return an iterator for the sorted collection.
Use both a LinkedHashMap and a TreeMap, and update the two in parallel.
Create a custom fascade class for a LinkedHashMap and a TreeMap. This needs to keep both data structures up to date when you call put, remove etcetera, and also provide extra methods for getting the sorted values.
If you can sort your items up front by the value attribute, then you can use a LinkedListHashMap, since that preserves the order you specify. However, this seems a bit fragile, and is not suitable if you need to later add more items to the map.
The alternative is to store the values in a list, sorted as you need, and use binary search to retrieve items and find the insertion point for new items.
You can even wrap all this and put it behind a Map interface.
The Collections class provides binarySearch. Here's an outline:
Put your Value class in a list, List<Value> values.
Implement a Comparable<Value> class that compares values using the attribute you want to sort them on.
Use Comparator<Value> to sort the list.
Now that the list is sorted, you can use Collections.binarySearch(values, aValue, Comparator<Value>) to find the index of the actual value. Note that aValue isn't a real value - it's a value with the attributes set to provide the key, but the rest of it is uninitalized. The aValue is only used to hold the sort key.
In code
List<Value> values = new ArrayList<Values>();
// .. add values
values.add(new Value(key, data1, data2, etc..));
Comparator<Value> compValue = new Comparator<Value>() {
public int compare(Value v1, Value v2) {
return v1.getKey()>v2.getKey();
}
}
Collections.sort(values, compValue);
// now we can search on key
int index = Collections.binarySearch(values, new Value(keyTofind), valueComp);
Value foundValue = null; // value with the key may not be in the list
if (index>=0)
foundValue = values.get(index);
// we can also update the list
Value newValue = new Value(key, data, data2, etc...);
int insert = Collections.binarySearch(values, newValue, valueComp);
// insert will be negative
values.add((-insert)-1, newValue);
EDIT: If you wrap this up in a Map interface, e.g. extending AbstractMap, it will be serializable.