I want to do authentication in RESTful web service for every request. I have read scope about OAuth in website.
What should I store in database or which token key or access key need to check with database? I have REST web serivce and android app to call web serivce. So, Web service is served as a Service Provider, UserLogin is user and Android application as a Consumer like describe in Oauth site. So, if user request from android like
GET /username/a.jpg HTTP/1.1
Host: localhost:8080
Authorization: OAuth realm="http://localhost/username/a.jpg",
oauth_consumer_key="dpf43f3p2l4k3l03",
oauth_token="nnch734d00sl2jdk",
oauth_nonce="kllo9940pd9333jh",
oauth_timestamp="1191242096",
oauth_signature_method="HMAC-SHA1",
oauth_version="1.0",
oauth_signature="tR3%2BTy81lMeYAr%2FFid0kMTYa%2FWM%3D"
But from server side which is web service how to check with database or which key will be use to check? is it signature?
Read up on http://oauth.net/core/1.0/ .. specifically Appendix A.2 through A.4.
It describes the "handshake" that takes place when a service fails to get access, then redirects the user to the authentication website, then is returned back to the callback url.
As you asked, in A.4, yes, the service then examines the signature and replies with an access token.
Related
I am using Cognito in AWS. There are no users in the Cognito User-Pool, instead of this it is connected to a federated IDP through OpenId Connect. The federated IDP is an Microsoft ADFS.
I have another application, which is using the Cognito OpenId Connect solution for securing an web Application.
The User access the Web Applikation, is beeing redirected to the IDP Login page. He authenticates against the federated IDP, gets back to the Website and is logged in there.
Everything is fine in this scenario.
The same web application offers a REST Api, too. With this connection I have some trouble. There is no human user who is consuming this API, but I have a service account created in ADFS.
First of all I need to get the access code:
https://demo-cognito-trg.auth.eu-central-1.amazoncognito.com/oauth2/authorize?response_type=code&client_id=1************q&redirect_uri=https://my-redirect-domain/management&state=STATE&scope=openid+profile+email
From that URL I can get the authorization code and use this to get an access_token from the oauth2/token endpoint. But when I do a GET on this ressource, I get a webpage where I need to authenticate myself.
What call do I need to perform so that I can use f.e basic auth to signin my service user?
I have a spring boot (backend) & angular (frontend) app that I'd like to secure with keycloak (for the authentication).
I have a very basic deployment, in which the executable jar created by spring also serves the client code (from angular).
I have seen several tutorials where the front and back are separated, and the front uses the code flow + pkce to delegate its authentication to keycloak, while the back is stateless and checks for presence of a jwt token certified by the keycloak instance.
However since I have a backend server, I'd like to avoid using a public client and instead rely on the back-channel token exchange on the server side. So the front should not have any knowledge of the keycloak instance.
Is that possible / is it a best practice ? Is there a front library that helps me to achieve that ? I've come across the library keycloak-angular, but it seems to be directed towards the first case, where the SPA connects directly to Keycloak instead of using a backend server.
In such a case you don't need a frontend library. In your frontend you should just handle user session (have a session cookie) and send the cookie every time to your backend. Then the backend server should use any oauth client to communicate with your keycloak server, and once it gets the tokens it can save them in a db together with a handle to your session.
Here's how this flow might look like:
request client -> backend server -> reply with a 302 to the keycloak authorization endpoint. Registered redirect_uri should be a uri exposed by the backend server
user performs authentication / consent, etc.
Keycloak redirects to redirect_uri with code
Backend receives code (as it listens on the redirect uri address), and exchanges it with Keycloak.
Backend receives access token and saves it in a DB together with session ID.
When clients makes another request to backend with their session, backend picks an access token from the DB and can call an API.
From my application I have to invoke external http service which uses google authentication. It works when I invoke it from browser. I found out that it happens because I have cookie which contains
GCP_IAAP_AUTH_TOKEN_<random_string>
GCP_IAP_UID
So my cookie look like this:
cookie: GCP_IAP_UID=111111111111; GCP_IAAP_AUTH_TOKEN_1234567891234567890B=verylongstringhere"
I tried to set this cookie directly in my restTemplate and it works properly but I expect that I have to get token based on some kind of credentials.
webClient.post()
.uri(uploadUrl)
.header("cookie", "GCP_IAP_UID=12345678901234567890; GCP_IAAP_AUTH_TOKEN_12345678907645456546B=verylongstringhere")
Could you please provide example of correct usage GCP auth ? How to update token? Based on what?
Google APIs use the OAuth 2.0 protocol for authentication and authorization
You can obtain OAuth 2.0 client credentials from the Google API Console. Then your client application requests an access token from the Google Authorization Server, extracts a token from the response, and sends the token to the Google API that you want to access.
Before your application can access private data using a Google API, it must obtain an access token that grants access to that API.
There are several ways to make this request, and they vary based on the type of application you are building. For example, a JavaScript application might request an access token using a browser redirect to Google, while an application installed on a device that has no browser uses web service requests.
I recommend you to go trough OAuth 2.0 to Access Google APIs article to choose the best method for your application, there are a couple of documented scenarios to explain how GCP uses application authentication
I have a Java servlet that accepts HTTP requests, "protected" by KeyCloak. I can manually send a GET request, which redirects me to the KeyCloak login page, and I can log in and see the correct webpage from the servlet. Now I would like to make it such that my other Java application can also authenticate itself and access the webpage.
In my current setup I have the Java servlet running in Wildfly and the keycloak standalone. I have a KeyCloak realm with a user "testuser" with the role "testrole" and client "testclient". To be fair I don't really know what the client does, since it has no role or other attributes set. Should it represent the servlet application or the requesting Java application? What attributes should I set here?
The documentation mentiones JWT Tokens, but I don't know how I can obtain one. The actual request should be to "localhost:8080/testservlet" , do I have to query for a token at the KeyCloak server first, or should I go through the redirect process as when it is "manual"?
I'm developing a web application that has a REST api. At the moment the Api are protected in the server side trough spring security with a form-login authentication. Recently I also added spring social to allow access with facebook and twitter and all this works. So a user has to be registered to access some endpoint.
Now I have to build a mobile application that has to access the REST api and I was wondering what strategy I should use.
I saw that facebook has a android/ios sdk to allow the authentication on mobile side. So once theuser is authenticaded on the mobile I should do the request to my server so how should I authenticate the user on the server side to access the resources?
If you think that is not a good solution can you give me an advice how I should solve this problem?
Two options:
Your mobile app can login to your API the same way your other client code does, via form-login or spring social. Simply send the same session ID cookie with your API calls after login.
You can allow your app to accept a username and password as HTTP headers via HTTP-Basic, to save yourself the initial login step. This might be more useful if you don't need to make a lot of API calls per session.