In the Play! framework source for the main method in Server.java I found these two lines:
File root = new File(System.getProperty("application.path"));
if (System.getProperty("precompiled", "false").equals("true")) {
Play.usePrecompiled = true;
}
Where can I find the application.path value?
System.getProperty("application.path") that looks like a -D property. So at the start of the server there is a call like
java -Dapplication.path=/opt/play/myApp
/play/framework/pym/play/application.py in line 251 makes the work.
There might be a properties file in your application and also there might be a mechanism to load all those properties into System properties.
Search for application.path in your application folder file contents and you may get a clue.
It may be in your application.conf file. Check there.
Related
I've looked around the web for quite some time without getting a answer that works.
So my issue is that I cannot load the stream of my image.
My Code as to test it:
System.out.println(Main.class.getResourceAsStream("AQUA_KINGDOM.png"));
System.out.println(Main.class.getResourceAsStream("/img/AQUA_KINGDOM.png"));
System.out.println(Main.class.getResourceAsStream("img/AQUA_KINGDOM.png"));
System.out.println(Main.class.getResourceAsStream("conquest/img/AQUA_KINGDOM.png"));
System.out.println(Main.class.getResourceAsStream("/conquest/img/AQUA_KINGDOM.png"));
System.out.println(Main.class.getResourceAsStream("kingconquest/conquest/img/AQUA_KINGDOM.png"));
System.out.println(Main.class.getResourceAsStream("/kingconquest/conquest/img/AQUA_KINGDOM.png"));
System.out.println(Main.class.getResourceAsStream("/eu/kingconquest/conquest/img/AQUA_KINGDOM.png"));
And this is my content tree:
They all return null
Additional information:
I am using Eclipse neon(Latest stable)
I also forgot to mention that this is a plugin (exports as a "jar file")
*Plugin for minecraft spigotAPI for those interested
Try using ClassLoader like this:
Main.class.getClassLoader().getResourceAsStream("AQUA_KINGDOM.png");
Hi I have test program which loads files into hdfs at this path user/user1/data/app/type/file.gz Now this test program runs multiple times by multiple users. So I want to set file permission to rwx so that anyone can delete this file. I have the following code
fs.setPermission(new Path("user/user1/data"),new FsPermission(FsAction.ALL,FsAction.ALL,FsAction.ALL))
Above line gives drwxrwxrwx to all dirs but for the file.gz it gives permission as -rw-r--r-- why so? Because of this reason another user apart from me not able to delete this file through test program. I can delete file through test program because I have full permssion.
Please guide. I am new to Hadoop. Thanks in advance.
Using FsShell APIs solved my dir permission problem. It may be not be optimal way but since I am solving it for test code it should be fine.
FsShell shell=new FsShell(conf);
try {
shell.run(new String[]{"-chmod","-R","777","user/usr1/data"});
}
catch ( Exception e) {
LOG.error("Couldnt change the file permissions ",e);
throw new IOException(e);
}
I think Hadoop doesn't provide a java API to provide permission recursively in the version you are using. The code is actually giving permission to the dir user/user1/data and nothing else. You should better use FileSystem.listStatus(Path f) method to list down all files in the directory and use Filsystem.setPermission to them individually. It's working currently on my 2.0.5-alpha-gphd-2.1.0.0 cluster.
However from Hadoop 2.2.0 onward a new constructor
FsPermission(FsAction u, FsAction g, FsAction o, boolean sb)
is being provided. The boolean field may be the recursive flag you wanted. But the documentation(including param name) is too poor to infer something concrete.
Also have a look at Why does "hadoop fs -mkdir" fail with Permission Denied? although your sitaution may be different. (in my case dfs.permissions.enabled is still true).
I wrote this in scala but I think you could easily adapt it:
def changeUserGroup(user:String,fs:FileSystem, path: Path): Boolean ={
val changedPermission = new FsPermission(FsAction.ALL,FsAction.ALL,FsAction.ALL, true)
val fileList = fs.listFiles(path, true)
while (fileList.hasNext()) {
fs.setPermission(fileList.next().getPath(),changedPermission)
}
return true
}
You will also have to add a logic for the error handling, I am always returning true.
Is there a way to convert JAR lib into JAR standalone?
I need to find a standalone java executable that convert PDF into TIFF and I've found these JARs: http://www.icefaces.org/JForum/posts/list/17504.page
Any ideas?
Easiest might be to create another Jar with a Main() entry point, and then just use the java.exe executable to run it:
e.g.
> java.exe -cp MyJarMain.jar;MyPDFJar.jar com.mydomain.MyMain myPDF.pdf
Where MyMain is a class with a Main static method.
You'll need something with a main entry point to pass in and interpret some command line arguments (myPDF.pdf in my made-up example)
You could do an assembly (are you using maven?) and make sure the Main-Class entry in the manifest.mf points to the main class.
Since there is no main-Method, you have to write one, or write a whole new class to call the class/method TiffConver.convertPDF .
The question is, how you're going to use it. From the command line, you need no executable jar. From the Gui, maybe you want to pass a file to be converted by drag and drop? Then you should take the parameter(s) passed to main as Input-PDF-Names (if they end in .pdf) and pass the names iteratively to TiffConverter, for "a.pdf b.pdf" =>
TiffConver.convertPDF ("a.pdf", "a.tiff");
TiffConver.convertPDF ("b.pdf", "b.tiff");
TiffCoverter will silently overwrite existing tiffs, so check that before or change the code there - this is clearly bad habit, and look out for more such things - I didn't.
/*
* Remove target file if exists
*/
File f = new File(tif);
if (f.exists()) {
f.delete();
}
Maybe you wan't to write a swing-wrapper, which let's you choose Files interactively to be converted. This would be a nice idee, if no filename is given.
If the user passes "a.pdf xy.tiff" you could rename the converted file to xy, as additional feature.
Without a main-class, however, a standalone jar would be magic.
However, building a native executale is almost always a bad idea. You loose portability, you don't profit from security- and performance improvements to the JVM or fixed bugs. For multiple programs you need always an independend bugfix, which you might have to manage yourself, if you don't have a package-management as most linux distros have.
after clearing some questions:
public static void main (String [] args) {
if (args.length == 1 && args[0].endsWith (".pdf")) {
String target = args[0].replaceAll (".pdf$", ".tif");
convertPDF (args[0], target);
}
}
This method you put into TiffConvert. It will allow you to convert a simple pdf-File, and generate a tif-File with the same basename but ending in .tif, silently overwriting an existing one of the same name.
I guess you now need to know how to start it?
I know. Heresy. But I'm in a bind. I have a lot of config files that use absolute path names, which creates an incompatibility between OS X and Windows. If I can get OS X (which I'm betting is the more flexible of the two) to recognize Q:/foo/bar/bim.properties as a valid absolute file name, it'll save me days of work spelunking through stack traces and config files.
In the end, I need this bit of Java test code to print "SUCCESS!" when it runs:
import java.io.*;
class DriveLetterTest {
static public void main(String... args) {
File f = new File("S:");
if (f.isDirectory()) {
System.out.println("SUCCESS!");
} else {
System.out.println("FAIL!");
}
}
}
Anyone know how this can be done?
UPDATE: Thanks for all the feedback, everyone. It's now obvious to me I really should have been clearer in my question.
Both the config files and the code that uses them belong to a third-party package I cannot change. (Well, I can change them, but that means incurring an ongoing maintenance load, which I want to avoid if at all possible.)
I'm in complete agreement with all of you who are appalled by this state of affairs. But the fact remains: I can't change the third-party code, and I really want to avoid forking the config files.
Short answer: No.
Long answer: For Java you should use System.getProperties(XXX).
Then you can load a Properties file or Configuration based on what you find in os.name.
Alternate Solution just strip off the S: when you read the existing configuration files on non-Windows machines and replace them with the appropriate things.
Opinion: Personally I would bite the bullet and deal with the technical debt now, fix all the configuration files at build time when the deployment for OSX is built and be done with it.
public class WhichOS
{
public static void main(final String[] args)
{
System.out.format("System.getProperty(\"os.name\") = %s\n", System.getProperty("os.name"));
System.out.format("System.getProperty(\"os.arch\") = %s\n", System.getProperty("os.arch"));
System.out.format("System.getProperty(\"os.version\") = %s\n", System.getProperty("os.version"));
}
}
the output on my iMac is:
System.getProperty("os.name") = Mac OS X
System.getProperty("os.arch") = x86_64
System.getProperty("os.version") = 10.6.4
Honestly, don't hard-code absolute paths in a program, even for a single-platform app. Do the correct thing.
The following is my wrong solution, saved to remind myself not to repeat giving a misdirected advice ... shame on me.
Just create a symbolic link named Q: just at the root directory / to / itself.
$ cd /
$ ln -s / Q:
$ ln -s / S:
You might need to use sudo. Then, at the start of your program, just chdir to /.
If you don't want Q: and S: to show up in the Finder, perform
$ /Developer/Tools/SetFile -P -a V Q:
$ /Developer/Tools/SetFile -P -a V S:
which set the invisible-to-the-Finder bit of the files.
The only way you can replace java.io.File is to replace that class in rt.jar.
I don't recommend that, but the best way to do this is to grab a bsd-port of the OpenJDK code, make necessary changes, build it and redistribute the binary with your project. Write a shell script to use your own java binary and not the built-in one.
PS. Just change your config files! Practice your regex skills and save yourself a lot of time.
If you are not willing to change your config file per OS, what are they for in first place?
Every installation should have its own set of config files and use it accordingly.
But if you insist.. you just have to detect the OS version and if is not Windows, ignore the letter:
Something along the lines:
boolean isWindows = System.getProperty("os.name").toLowerCase()
.contains("windows");
String folder = "S:";
if (isWindows && folder.matches("\\w:")) {
folder = "/";
} else if (isWindows && folder.matches("\\w:.+")) {
folder = folder.substring(2);// ignoring the first two letters S:
}
You get the idea
Most likely you'd have to provide a different java.io.File implementation that can parse out the file paths correctly, maybe there's one someone already made.
The real solution is to put this kind of stuff (hard-coded file paths) in configuration files and not in the source code.
Just tested something out, and discovered something interesting: In Windows, if the current directory is on the same logical volume (i.e. root is the same drive letter), you can leave off the drive letter when using a path. So you could just trim off all those drive letters and colons and you should be fine as long as you aren't using paths to items on different disks.
Here's what I finally ended up doing:
I downloaded the source code for the java.io package, and tweaked the code for java.io.File to look for path names that start with a letter and a colon. If it finds one, it prepends "/Volumes/" to the path name, coughs a warning into System.err, then continues as normal.
I've added symlinks under /Volumes to the "drives" I need mapped, so I have:
/Volumes/S:
/Volumes/Q:
I put it into its own jar, and put that jar at the front of the classpath for this project only. This way, the hack affects only me, and only this project.
Net result: java.io.File sees a path like "S:/bling.properties", and then checks the OS. If the OS is OS X, it prepends "/Volumes/", and looks for a file in /Volumes/S:/bling.properties, which is fine, because it can just follow the symlink.
Yeah, it's ugly as hell. But it gets the job done for today.
I am trying to find a way to collected all java.lang.Class's loaded from jar files but ignore the ones from the source code itself.
I have found java.lang.instrument.Instrumentation interface and thought it might serve the purpose, but it turned out not quite.... One of the available functions "getAllLoadedClasses" dump all java.lang.Class's out (which is good), but it not only dump onces got loaded from jar file and also loaded from the source file.
Is there a configuration that allows us to customize the setting so only the java.lang.Class's originated from jar files are dumped or there is better solution in the wild?
What I want to achieve in code representation will be something like below.
java.lang.Class[]
classesLoadedFromJars = getClassesLoadedFromJars();
for (java.lang.Class class : classesLoadedFromJars) {
// ..............
}
A word or two on the suggestion will be helpful!
Thanks in advance.
The class's classloader should be able to give you a clue as to where a certain class was loaded from.
ClassLoader loader = myClass.getClassLoader()
if (loader instanceof URLClassLoader) {
URLClassLoader uLoader = (URLClassLoader)loader;
URL cURL = uLoader.getResource(myClass.getName().replace('.', '/')+".class");
}
if cURL starts with jar:// , the class originated from a jar file