Multiple beans validation inside containing bean with different group interfaces - java

I have problem with validation a very specific beans.
Let me give you some code first:
#Entity
#Table(name = "customers", schema = "public", uniqueConstraints = #UniqueConstraint(columnNames = {"cus_email" }))
public class Customers extends ModelObject implements java.io.Serializable {
private static final long serialVersionUID = -3197505684643025341L;
private long cusId;
private String cusEmail;
private String cusPassword;
private Addresses shippingAddress;
private Addresses invoiceAddress;
#Id
#Column(name = "cus_id", unique = true, nullable = false)
#SequenceGenerator(name = "cus_seq", sequenceName = "customers_cus_id_seq", allocationSize = 1)
#GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.SEQUENCE, generator = "cus_seq")
#NotNull
public long getCusId() {
return cusId;
}
public void setCusId(long cusId) {
this.cusId = cusId;
}
#NotEmpty
#Size(min=5, max=255)
#Email
#Column(name = "cus_email", unique = true, nullable = false, length = 255)
public String getCusEmail() {
return cusEmail;
}
public void setCusEmail(String cusEmail) {
this.cusEmail = cusEmail;
}
#NotNull
#Column(name = "cus_password", nullable = false)
public String getCusPassword() {
return cusPassword;
}
public void setCusPassword(String cusPassword) {
this.cusPassword = cusPassword;
}
#NotNull
#OneToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
#JoinColumn(name = "cus_shipping_adr_id", nullable = false)
#Cascade(value = CascadeType.ALL)
#Valid
public Addresses getShippingAddress() {
return shippingAddress;
}
public void setShippingAddress(Addresses cusShippingAddress) {
this.shippingAddress = cusShippingAddress;
}
#OneToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
#JoinColumn(name = "cus_invoice_adr_id", nullable = true)
#Cascade(value = CascadeType.ALL)
#Valid
public Addresses getInvoiceAddress() {
return invoiceAddress;
}
public void setInvoiceAddress(Addresses cusInvoiceAddress) {
this.invoiceAddress = cusInvoiceAddress;
}
}
As you can see, I have here two address fields - one for shipping address, the other for invoice address.
The validation for each type of address should be different, as e.g. I don't need VAT number in shipping address, but I may want that in invoice.
I used groups to perform different validation on invoice address and shipping address which works OK if I do manual validation of address field.
But now I'd like to validate whole Customer object with addresses (if available).
I tried to do that with code below:
private void validateCustomerData() throws CustomerValidationException {
ValidatorFactory factory = Validation.buildDefaultValidatorFactory();
Validator validator = factory.getValidator();
Set<ConstraintViolation<Customers>> constraintViolations;
constraintViolations = validator.validate(customer, Default.class, InvoiceAddressCheck.class, ShippingAddressCheck.class);
if (!constraintViolations.isEmpty()) {
throw new CustomerValidationException(3, Message.CustomerDataException, constraintViolations);
}
}
Of course this doesn't work as it supposed, since both validations are run on both instances of address objects inside customer object, so I get errors in shipping address from InvoiceAddressCheck interface and errors in invoice address from ShippingAddressCheck.
Here is shortened declaration of Addresses bean:
#Entity
#Table(name = "addresses", schema = "public")
#TypeDef(name = "genderConverter", typeClass = GenderConverter.class)
public class Addresses extends ModelObject implements Serializable{
private static final long serialVersionUID = -1123044739678014182L;
private long adrId;
private String street;
private String houseNo;
private String zipCode;
private String state;
private String countryCode;
private String vatNo;
private Customers customersShipping;
private Customers customersInvoice;
public Addresses() {}
public Addresses(long adrId) {
super();
this.adrId = adrId;
}
#Id
#Column(name = "adr_id", unique = true, nullable = false)
#SequenceGenerator(name = "adr_seq", sequenceName = "adr_id_seq", allocationSize = 1)
#GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.SEQUENCE, generator = "adr_seq")
#NotNull
public long getAdrId() {
return adrId;
}
public void setAdrId(long adrId) {
this.adrId = adrId;
}
#NotNull
#Column(name = "adr_street", nullable = false)
public String getStreet() {
return street;
}
public void setStreet(String street) {
this.street = street;
}
#NotEmpty(groups = ShippingAddressCheck.class)
#Column(name = "adr_house_no")
public String getHouseNo() {
return houseNo;
}
#NotEmpty(groups = ShippingAddressCheck.class)
#Column(name = "adr_zip_code")
public String getZipCode() {
return zipCode;
}
public void setZipCode(String zipCode) {
this.zipCode = zipCode;
}
#Column(name = "adr_vat_no")
#NotEmpty(groups = InvoiceAddressCheck.class)
public String getVatNo() {
return vatNo;
}
public void setVatNo(String vatNo) {
this.vatNo = vatNo;
}
#OneToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY, mappedBy = "shippingAddress")
public Customers getCustomersShipping() {
return customersShipping;
}
public void setCustomersShipping(Customers customersShipping) {
this.customersShipping = customersShipping;
}
#OneToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY, mappedBy = "invoiceAddress")
public Customers getCustomersInvoice() {
return customersInvoice;
}
public void setCustomersInvoice(Customers customersInvoice) {
this.customersInvoice = customersInvoice;
}
}
Is there any way to run the validation, so that invoiceAddress is validated with InvoiceAddressCheck group and shippingAddress validated with ShippingAddressCheck group, but run during validation of Customer object?
I know that I can do it manually for each subobject, but that is not the point in here.

Temp solution for now is to write custom validation for invoice field, so it checks only InvoiceAddressCheck.
Here is the code I have
Annotation:
#Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
#Documented
#Constraint(validatedBy = {InvoiceAddressValidator.class })
public #interface InvoiceAddressChecker {
String message() default "Invoice address incorrect.";
Class<?>[] groups() default {};
Class<? extends Payload>[] payload() default {};
}
Validator:
public class InvoiceAddressValidator implements ConstraintValidator<InvoiceAddressChecker, Addresses> {
#Override
public void initialize(InvoiceAddressChecker params) {
}
#Override
public boolean isValid(Addresses invoiceAddress, ConstraintValidatorContext context) {
// invoice address is optional
if (invoiceAddress == null) {
return true;
}
ValidatorFactory factory = Validation.buildDefaultValidatorFactory();
Validator validator = factory.getValidator();
Set<ConstraintViolation<Addresses>> constraintViolations;
constraintViolations = validator.validate(invoiceAddress, Default.class, InvoiceAddressCheck.class);
if (constraintViolations.isEmpty()) {
return true;
} else {
context.disableDefaultConstraintViolation();
Iterator<ConstraintViolation<Addresses>> iter = constraintViolations.iterator();
while (iter.hasNext()) {
ConstraintViolation<Addresses> violation = iter.next();
context.buildConstraintViolationWithTemplate(violation.getMessage()).addNode(
violation.getPropertyPath().toString()).addConstraintViolation();
}
return false;
}
}
}
And model annotation:
#OneToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
#JoinColumn(name = "cus_invoice_adr_id", nullable = true)
#Cascade(value = CascadeType.ALL)
#InvoiceAddressChecker
public Addresses getInvoiceAddress() {
return invoiceAddress;
}
It's not really great solution, but it does what I need.
If you figure out better solution, please let me know :)

Related

JPA find by Api Key returns null

Im working on a Spring Boot application and the repository method to retrieve by apiKey is returning null.
This is the controller:
#RestController
#RequestMapping("/api/wetlab")
public class WetLabController {
#Autowired
WetLabService wetLabService;
#GetMapping("/getAllWetlabsType")
#PreAuthorize("hasRole('INTERNAL')")
public List<WetLab> getAllWetlabs() {
return wetLabService.getAllWetLabs();
}
#GetMapping("/{apiKey}")
#PreAuthorize("hasRole('INTERNAL')")
public WetLab getByApiKey(#PathVariable UUID apiKey) {
return wetLabService.getByApiKey(apiKey);
}
#ExceptionHandler(DataRetrievalFailureException.class)
void handleNotFound(HttpServletResponse response, Exception e) throws IOException {
response.sendError(HttpStatus.NOT_FOUND.value(), e.getMessage());
}
}
This is the service
#Service
public class WetLabService {
#Autowired
WetLabRepository wetLabRepo;
public List<WetLab> getAllWetLabs() {
List<WetLab> wetLabs = new ArrayList<>();
wetLabRepo.findAll().forEach(wetLabs::add);
return wetLabs;
}
public WetLab getByApiKey(UUID apiKey) {
System.out.println(apiKey);
WetLab wetlabOpt = wetLabRepo.findByApiKey(apiKey);
return wetlabOpt;
// if (wetlabOpt.isPresent()) {
// } else {
// throw new NotFoundException("WetLab not found");
// }
}
}
And this is the repo
#Repository
public interface WetLabRepository extends CrudRepository<WetLab, Long> {
public WetLab findByApiKey(UUID apiKey);
}
And this is the wetlab class
#Entity
#Table(name = "wetlab")
public class WetLab {
#Id
#Column(name = "id")
#GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.AUTO, generator = "wetLab_seq")
#SequenceGenerator(name = "wetLab_seq", sequenceName = "wetLab_seq", allocationSize = 1)
private Long id;
#Column(name = "apiKey", updatable = true, nullable = false, unique = true, columnDefinition = "BINARY(16)")
#NotNull
private UUID apiKey;
#Column(name = "name", length = 50)
#NotNull
private String name;
#OneToMany
private List<Plot> plot;
// Accessors
public WetLab() {
}
public WetLab(Long id, UUID apiKey, String name) {
this.id = id;
this.apiKey = apiKey;
this.name = name;
}
}
The another method is working without errors and the path variable apiKey is not null.
Its strange because in other projects this approach worked fine...
Thanks you

Hibernate OneToMany creating many records

I have this two object Input and IndisponibleSegment with a relation one to many respectively:
#Entity
#Table(name= "input")
public class Input {
private long _id;
private String _name;
private Set<IndisponibleSegment> _indisponibleSegments;
#Column(name = "name", unique = true, nullable = false, length = 25)
public String getName() {
return _name;
}
public void setName(String inName) {
this._name = inName;
}
#Id
#GeneratedValue(strategy = IDENTITY)
#Column(name = "id", unique = true, nullable = false)
public long getId() {
return _id;
}
public void setId(long inId) {
this._id = inId;
}
#OneToMany(fetch = FetchType.EAGER, mappedBy = "input", cascade = CascadeType.ALL, orphanRemoval = true)
public Set<IndisponibleSegment> getIndisponibleSegments() {
return _indisponibleSegments;
}
public void setIndisponibleSegments(Set<IndisponibleSegment> inIndisponibleSegments) {
this._indisponibleSegments = inIndisponibleSegments;
}
}
And:
#Entity
#Table(name = "indisponible_segment")
public class IndisponibleSegment {
private Lane _lane;
private int _id;
private Input _input;
#ManyToOne(fetch=FetchType.EAGER)
#Cascade(value={org.hibernate.annotations.CascadeType.ALL})
#JoinColumn(name="input_id")
public Input getInput() {
return _input;
}
public void setInput(Input inInput) {
this._input = inInput;
}
#Id
#GeneratedValue(strategy = IDENTITY)
#Column(name = "id")
public int getId() {
return _id;
}
public void setId(int inId) {
this._id = inId;
}
#Enumerated(EnumType.STRING)
#Column(name = "lane", nullable = false)
public Lane getLane() {
return _lane;
}
public void setLane(Lane inLane) {
this._lane = inLane;
}
}
My problem is that everytime run a code like:
DAO dao = new DAO();
Input input = dao.get(Input.class, new Long(1));
if(input==null) {
input = new Input();
input.setName("Input 1");
}
Set<IndisponibleSegment> islist = new HashSet<>();
IndisponibleSegment is = new IndisponibleSegment();
is.setInput(input);
is.setLane(Lane.LANE_FAST);
islist.add(is);
input.setIndisponibleSegments(islist);
dao.saveOrUpdate(input);
I get a new entry in the indisponible_segments table and the old is not removed, thus still there.
I have tried all combinations I can think of: Cascade, delete-orphans, unique constranits... all. What am I doing wrong? All I want is that if I set a new the indisponibleSegments the old ones are deleted.

Composite primary Key and Data truncation error

I'm using Hibernate and MySql and today I setted a composite primary key in one of my table, so below:
DefSelfLearning
And this entity is OneToMany with SelfLearning:
This is my java entity:
#Entity
#Table(name = "defselflearning", catalog = "ats")
public class DefSelfLearning implements java.io.Serializable {
/**
*
*/
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
#EmbeddedId
private DefSelfLearningKeys defSelfLearningKeys;
private Ecu ecu;
private String excelColumn;
#JsonIgnore
private Set<SelfLearning> selfLearnings = new HashSet<SelfLearning>(0);
public DefSelfLearning() {
}
public DefSelfLearning(DefSelfLearningKeys defSelfLearningKeys, Ecu ecu) {
this.defSelfLearningKeys = defSelfLearningKeys;
this.ecu = ecu;
}
public DefSelfLearning(Ecu ecu, DefSelfLearningKeys defSelfLearningKeys, String excelColumn, Set<SelfLearning> selfLearnings) {
this.ecu = ecu;
this.defSelfLearningKeys = defSelfLearningKeys;
this.excelColumn = excelColumn;
this.selfLearnings = selfLearnings;
}
#Id
public DefSelfLearningKeys getDefSelfLearningKeys() {
return this.defSelfLearningKeys;
}
public void setDefSelfLearningKeys(DefSelfLearningKeys defSelfLearningKeys) {
this.defSelfLearningKeys = defSelfLearningKeys;
}
#ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
#JoinColumn(name = "id_ecu", nullable = false)
public Ecu getEcu() {
return this.ecu;
}
public void setEcu(Ecu ecu) {
this.ecu = ecu;
}
#Column(name = "excelColumn", length = 2)
public String getExcelColumn() {
return this.excelColumn;
}
public void setExcelColumn(String excelColumn) {
this.excelColumn = excelColumn;
}
#OneToMany(fetch = FetchType.LAZY, mappedBy = "defSelfLearning")
public Set<SelfLearning> getSelfLearnings() {
return this.selfLearnings;
}
public void setSelfLearnings(Set<SelfLearning> selfLearnings) {
this.selfLearnings = selfLearnings;
}
}
the class for the composite key:
#Embeddable
public class DefSelfLearningKeys implements Serializable {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
protected String parName;
protected String description;
protected String note;
public DefSelfLearningKeys() {}
public DefSelfLearningKeys(String parName, String description, String note) {
this.parName = parName;
this.description = description;
this.note = note;
}
#Column(name = "parName", nullable = false, length = 15)
public String getParName() {
return this.parName;
}
public void setParName(String parName) {
this.parName = parName;
}
#Column(name = "description", nullable = false, length = 100)
public String getDescription() {
return this.description;
}
public void setDescription(String description) {
this.description = description;
}
#Column(name = "note", nullable = false, length = 100)
public String getNote() {
return this.note;
}
public void setNote(String note) {
this.note = note;
}
}
and SelfLearning class:
#Entity
#Table(name = "selflearning", catalog = "ats")
public class SelfLearning implements java.io.Serializable {
/**
*
*/
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
private int idSelfLearning;
private Acquisition acquisition;
private DefSelfLearning defSelfLearning;
private String value;
public SelfLearning() {
}
public SelfLearning(int idSelfLearning, Acquisition acquisition, DefSelfLearning defSelfLearning) {
this.idSelfLearning = idSelfLearning;
this.acquisition = acquisition;
this.defSelfLearning = defSelfLearning;
}
public SelfLearning(int idSelfLearning, Acquisition acquisition, DefSelfLearning defSelfLearning, String value) {
this.idSelfLearning = idSelfLearning;
this.acquisition = acquisition;
this.defSelfLearning = defSelfLearning;
this.value = value;
}
#Id
#GeneratedValue(strategy = IDENTITY)
#Column(name = "id_selfLearning", unique = true, nullable = false)
public int getIdSelfLearning() {
return this.idSelfLearning;
}
public void setIdSelfLearning(int idSelfLearning) {
this.idSelfLearning = idSelfLearning;
}
#ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
#JoinColumn(name = "id_acquisition", nullable = false)
public Acquisition getAcquisition() {
return this.acquisition;
}
public void setAcquisition(Acquisition acquisition) {
this.acquisition = acquisition;
}
#ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
#JoinColumns({
#JoinColumn(name = "id_parName", nullable = false),
#JoinColumn(name = "id_description", nullable = false),
#JoinColumn(name = "id_note", nullable = false)
})
public DefSelfLearning getDefSelfLearning() {
return this.defSelfLearning;
}
public void setDefSelfLearning(DefSelfLearning defSelfLearning) {
this.defSelfLearning = defSelfLearning;
}
#Column(name = "value")
public String getValue() {
return this.value;
}
public void setValue(String value) {
this.value = value;
}
}
but when I create a defSelfLearning all work fine, but when I create a SelfLearning I receive MysqlDataTruncation exception:
Caused by: com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlDataTruncation: Data truncation: Data too long for column 'id_parName' at row 1
This error is enough explined, but I don't find where is the problem, this is the code for SelfLearning creation:
for (DefSelfLearning defSelfLearning:defSelfLearningList){
SelfLearning selfLearning=new SelfLearning();
String key = defSelfLearning.getExcelColumn()+index;
String value = actualRowValues.get(key);
selfLearning.setAcquisition(findByCarAndExcelRow(carServices.findById(acquisitionForm.getCar()), index));
selfLearning.setDefSelfLearning(defSelfLearning);
selfLearning.setValue(value);
System.out.println(selfLearning.getDefSelfLearning().getDefSelfLearningKeys().getParName());
selfLearningServices.create(selfLearning);
}
Do you find where is the problem?Thanks
This is the first row of defSelfLearning and it's where the code fails
if I set manually this it works:
This is a screen of java debug of first code, that fails:
You try to insert a char which is longer than 15 in the column "id_parName"
On your Entities, you have to choose between field and getter. And all the annotations should be on fields, or they should all be on getters, you can't mix both approaches (except if you use the #AccessType annotation).
Hibernate / Jpa will pick up the used approch from the annotation on Id.
Change #Id on the first Embeddable entity to #EmbeddedId and make sure it is on the getter.
SelfLearning wrong mappings the columns, id_parName= id_description, id_description= id_note and id_note=id_parName, but why?
So I read:
When the JoinColumns annotation is used, both the name and the
referencedColumnName elements must be specified in each such
JoinColumn annotation.
I have added this element so:
#ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
#JoinColumns({
#JoinColumn(name = "id_parName", referencedColumnName="parName", nullable = false),
#JoinColumn(name = "id_description", referencedColumnName="description", nullable = false),
#JoinColumn(name = "id_note", referencedColumnName="note", nullable = false)
})
public DefSelfLearning getDefSelfLearning() {
return this.defSelfLearning;
}
And it works

mapping bean information while creating SessionFactory object from HibernateUtils

I have created a sessionFactory object from HibernateUtils as below
configuration.setProperty("connection.driver_class",prop.getProperty("driverClassName"));
configuration.setProperty("hibernate.connection.url",prop.getProperty("url"));
configuration.setProperty("hibernate.connection.username", prop.getProperty("username"));
configuration.setProperty("hibernate.connection.password", prop.getProperty("password"));
configuration.setProperty("hibernate.dialect", prop.getProperty("dialect"));
configuration.setProperty("hibernate.default_schema", prop.getProperty("schema"));
configuration.setProperty("hibernate.hbm2ddl.auto", "validate");
configuration.setProperty("packagesToScan", "daoBean");
I have a database where Test database and stock table is already created in this.
Now I am mapping a model object to insert the information.
#Entity
#Table(name = "stock", catalog = "mkyongdb", uniqueConstraints = {
#UniqueConstraint(columnNames = "STOCK_NAME"),
#UniqueConstraint(columnNames = "STOCK_CODE") })
public class Stock implements java.io.Serializable {
private Integer stockId;
private String stockCode;
private String stockName;
private StockDetail stockDetail;
public Stock() {
}
public Stock(String stockCode, String stockName) {
this.stockCode = stockCode;
this.stockName = stockName;
}
public Stock(String stockCode, String stockName, StockDetail stockDetail) {
this.stockCode = stockCode;
this.stockName = stockName;
this.stockDetail = stockDetail;
}
#Id
#GeneratedValue(strategy = IDENTITY)
#Column(name = "STOCK_ID", unique = true, nullable = false)
public Integer getStockId() {
return this.stockId;
}
public void setStockId(Integer stockId) {
this.stockId = stockId;
}
#Column(name = "STOCK_CODE", unique = true, nullable = false, length = 10)
public String getStockCode() {
return this.stockCode;
}
public void setStockCode(String stockCode) {
this.stockCode = stockCode;
}
#Column(name = "STOCK_NAME", unique = true, nullable = false, length = 20)
public String getStockName() {
return this.stockName;
}
public void setStockName(String stockName) {
this.stockName = stockName;
}
#OneToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY, mappedBy = "stock", cascade = CascadeType.ALL)
public StockDetail getStockDetail() {
return this.stockDetail;
}
public void setStockDetail(StockDetail stockDetail) {
this.stockDetail = stockDetail;
}
}
please suggest to map the stock object to insert data.
I got your pain point.
please add this line
configuration.addAnnotatedClass(Stock.class);
I think this will solve your problem.

CASCADETYPE in EclipseLink JPA

I have two classess. The first class is TNota.
#Entity
#Table(name = "t_nota")
public class TNota implements Serializable {
#Id
#SequenceGenerator(name="seq_t_nota", sequenceName="seq_t_nota", initialValue=37, allocationSize=1)
#GeneratedValue(generator="seq_t_nota")
#Basic(optional = false)
#Column(name = "id_nota", nullable = false)
private double idNota;
#Basic(optional = false)
#Column(name = "nota", nullable = false, length = 255)
private String nota;
#JoinColumn(name = "id_tipo_nota", referencedColumnName = "id", nullable = false)
#ManyToOne(optional = false)
private NTipoNota nTipoNota;
public TNota() {
}
public TNota(Long idNota) {
this.idNota = idNota;
}
public double getIdNota() {
return idNota;
}
public void setIdNota(double idNota) {
this.idNota = idNota;
}
public String getNota() {
return nota;
}
public void setNota(String nota) {
this.nota = nota;
}
public NTipoNota getNTipoNota() {
return nTipoNota;
}
public void setNTipoNota(NTipoNota nTipoNota) {
this.nTipoNota = nTipoNota;
}
}
and the other class is NtipoNota..
#Entity
#Table(name = "n_tipo_nota")
public class NTipoNota implements Serializable {
#Id
#Basic(optional = false)
#Column(name = "id", nullable = false)
private Integer id;
#Basic(optional = false)
#Column(name = "nombre", nullable = false, length = 255)
private String nombre;
#OneToMany(cascade = CascadeType.ALL, mappedBy = "nTipoNota",fetch=FetchType.LAZY)
private List<TNota> tNotaList;
public NTipoNota() {
}
public NTipoNota(Integer id) {
this.id = id;
}
public Integer getId() {
return id;
}
public void setId(Integer id) {
this.id = id;
}
public String getNombre() {
return nombre;
}
public void setNombre(String nombre) {
this.nombre = nombre;
}
public List<TNota> getTNotaList() {
return tNotaList;
}
public void setTNotaList(List<TNota> tNotaList) {
this.tNotaList = tNotaList;
}
}
I have all type of notes stored in database. I just want to persist a new TNota as follows, but I got an error because it persists a new NTipoNota with id= 5 which already exists in database. Using TopLink I never had this trouble:
TNota note = new TNota();
note.setNota("Hola mundo");
note.setNTipoNota(new NTipoNota(5));
manager.persist(note);
I fixed as follow:
TNota note = new TNota();
note.setNota("Hola mundo");
note.setNTipoNota(manager.find(NTipoNota.class, 5);
manager.persist(note);
I would like not to have to change all code due to this problem. Is there any form to make that do not persist the objects when we create a new instance of them?.
Thanks for all.
You new code is correct, and your previous code is not correct. You could also call merge to resolve the relationship.

Categories

Resources