Develop Reference

Automatically check Java files for coding standard compliance

I'm working in Java development. I have recently come into a situation where I have to comply to coding standards: member and method ordering, naming conventions, modifier sequence. I am thinking about methods to either automate checking for compliance, or generate some sort of mechanism that does the reordering.
We're developing with Eclipse, but the technology would be open. One way it might work is to generate an external builder tool and add this to the projects. The disadvantage would be that it would automagically apply to all files, which could run into problems with legacy code, blowing up the error count to a degree where it is no longer a sensible metric of compliance. Also, it makes code reviews much more difficult, which is not wanted.
Another way would be some kind of parser with only informative capabilities. We could run a process inside Jenkins, and that certainly would work, but that would also mean that the code had already passed a review, which is usually a little late for a code compliance check.
Are there suggested or even easy methods to integrate such functionality into either IDE, the source control system (Mercurial) or even Jenkins? How is this enforced elsewhere?

I would not recommend doing such changes automatically. Even though most of the checkstyle/pmd complies are valid, it happens to me that I need to ignore some of the warnings/errors. Moreover - there is only very small pool of such easy issues. Most of the notifications require more complex operations and probably couldn't be done without human interaction.
I'm using Sonar integration. It contains many external checkers like PMD, CPD, Checkstyle, Findbugs and can integrate with some other useful tools like Cobertura (test coverage statistics). Its almost trivial to bind Sonar build to Jenkins build and trying to avoid major/critical issues might be considered as a good approach.
In developer environment I use Eclipse integration with findbugs. There is also some point of integration with sonar but it requires either submitting the code to server or running server locally, which I personally don't like. However after few cycles of polishing the code after code review in Sonar you will notice that you (and other team members) stick to most of the rules and checking reports on daily basis is enough.

One solution is to use JCSC / checkstyle or other tools that are command line friendly. Integrate this with your build process. Individual developer runs this on his branch.
Most tools integrate well with Jenkins (via plugins), which can be used as dash board

Further to #Jayan's answer, Jenkins has a CheckStyle plugin that will display the results of each CheckStyle run and let you set the build status depending on how many violations are found. So your setup steps would be:
Set up your CheckStyle rules to fit your coding standards
Add a step to your Jenkins build that runs CheckStyle
Add a post build step to publish the CheckStyle results.

Jayan mentions checkstyle, which is great for checking against coding standards.
I remember using Jalopy years ago for automated code formatting, it might suit your needs as well.
In all honesty though, I wouldn't reformat the code automatically. Using tools such as checkstyle to raise warnings is one thing. Taking control of a developer's source code is quite another, and most people find it terribly intrusive and unpleasant.
Also, a bug in a code checker will at worst generate incorrect warnings. A bug in a code beautifier might corrupt and destroy hours worth of work.

You can use JArchitect to check your best practice using CQLinq queries which is useful
to create easly your custom rules
JArchitect is free for open source contributors :http://www.jarchitect.com/JArchitectForOSS.aspx

Small java project growing (maven and junit)

I'm working on a growing java project and I'm probably going to cooperate with somebody else to improve some features.
I'd like to use some tools to improve the quality of my work keeping in mind that:
I don't have too much time to spend on this project
it's a small project but it's really important for me
I don't want to buy software/hardware for it
I'm already using SVN
what do you think about maven and junit? is it worth spending time for them?
Do you know any other good tool?

Maven and JUnit are good for enforcing good habits (unit testing, uniform structure) and together with good SCM habits, I would say those are amongst the most important things for collaborative development.

Since you are not using JUnit my guess is you don't have any unit tests yet. This would seem to me the most important step for you to take, if other people will start working on your code. Without unit tests, someone can easily break functionality without knowing it.
Create a suite of unit tests that cover at least 80% of the code. You can use Cobertura to measure code coverage. This might seem like a lot of work (it is) but will save you far more time in the future.
Maven is the de-facto standard for building and deployment at the moment, but it has its drawbacks too. If you have a well documented build procedure in place (either using Ant or custom scripts) I would suggest it is less important to introduce Maven than to add unit tests.

JUnit is good for helping verify your code on any project.
Maven has a learning curve that can be hard to get over. If you have one module and a relatively simple set of build steps you may find it simpler to use Ant.
On the other hand with a Maven build you can simply add additional reports to your code to check various parameters on your code, and it is much harder to migrate to Maven than if you've conformed to its conventions from the start.
Examples of Maven plugins that can help check your code:
Findbugs (static analysis of possible bugs)
Checkstyle (enforce coding standards)
PMD (more static analysis)
PMD CPD (copy paste detection)
JDepend (cyclic dependency checking and package coupling)
Cobertura (code coverage)
If you're interested in the code quality plugins, also consider Sonar, it wraps these plugins up and gives you some funky reports.
If you're interested in best practice, also consider a Continuous Integration server, Hudson is free and integrates well with Maven.

We use Maven and JUnit on a fairly large project and find it very helpful.
For project planning, I highly recommend FogBugz. It's the best issue tracking system I have seen to date with good support for project management as well, and free for teams of up to 2 people.

If you use Eclipse and SVN I would recommend you to take a look at Mylyn. Its underlying concepts are very simple but it helps a lot when working on a team.
In my modest opinion, Maven is too annoying for the real benefit of it. Maybe ant is just enough for your deployment tasks.

I've used maven on one project and miss it. There is a fairly large upfront investment though in getting it setup and configured. The XML documentation was out of date when i was working with it (perhaps this has improved). Once you get past this initial setup though it's a wonderful time saver.
As for JUnit, it's great. Use it.
Both of these tools should be treated as an investment. At first it may seem like a lot of unrelated stuff, but the project will grow more predictably with less problems over the long haul.

Setting up a new Java development shop

I'm setting up a Java development shop, currently just for myself as the only developer, but with hopes of needing to hire others as the business grows. Obviously I'm hoping to set it up right so that as more people come in, they can be productive right away. Please help suggest things I want to do, and tools to do them.
Here's what I think I need:
Distributed source code/revision control (Subversion?)
Bug tracking (does Trac do this?)
documentation (both internal and customer facing)
team communication
frequent automated building
maybe something to make sure automatic tests pass as part of the check-in process?

I like Hudson for Continuous Integration builds, and I like JIRA for issue tracking. Eclipse has plugins for both.
Hudson can watch software repositories and rebuild those projects that use the changed resources.
If you need more documentation than javadoc can cover (which is quite a lot) then consider a Wiki. Easy to use, and with a bit of structure you can massage it into a PDF.
Source control is a bugger. Too many to choose from. For a small development team start with either subversion or CVS (which is old but has supreme IDE support) and when you outgrow that and know your needs, then migrate to a better one. Most have migration tools from svn or cvs. It is harder to move from e.g. git to Mercurial, and you defintively want one with more than one implementation. Remember to have good backups of the source control repository - it IS your business. Frequent rsyncs, often tapes.
EDIT: You also want decent hardware. For the Continuous Integration server, the fastest build machine you can afford. For yourself the largest monitor you can afford (not in size, in resolution) for your primary monitor and as many extra monitors as you can afford to have (including adapters to your computer). I have found that Mac's use the pixels better than Windows, so that might also be a point.
My primary monitor is pivoted 90 degrees. This allows me to see many lines at once instead of a few long lines. (For some reason tradition says that editing areas should be wide and short, which may work in word but not in code where lines should not be wider than 72 characters)
Note on Eclipse: Use the source repository to have a single workspace per project! Use the Java Editor Save Function to reformat your code everytime you save - this makes it more readable up front, and goes better with the source repository as changes are marked in the correct version.
Edit: The reason for the CI server needing to be better than your development machine is because it will run all your tests every time you check stuff into your source repository. After a while, that WILL take time.
Personally I have found tests working well for library routines. They specify what works and what doesn't. It is harder to write good tests for whole applications, but you may want to look into that from the beginning, as it allows you to ensure that everything works for every check in. Write a comment if you are not familiar with the concept.
Whatever you choose for the individual parts, you will be glad if they can work together. Hudson knows how to talk to JIRA for instance. JIRA knows how to look in CVS.

To see what a big amount of people thinks to make a good software development environment read this article on the 12 points of joels test
This list does not include the things more important for you. Getting clients getting them to pay and manage legal stuff and taxes.

Most important, the right staff:
get great people who find work and handle customers (aka sales)
get software engineers who are smart and get things done (http://www.joelonsoftware.com/items/2007/06/05.html)
get someone who knows about accounting and the local legal and tax regulations, so you don't get any surprises
Tools / Processes:
use a distributed version control system like git or mercurial
jira or the like for bug/issue tracking
continuous integration with hudson or cruisecontrol
wiki system to share the teams tangible knowledge
unit tests, clover, checkstyle, findbugs, ...
From a managerial point of view i would try
daily standup meetings (checkout scrum) to keep the team updated members to commit by saying what the did, do, and will do
timeboxed meetings, everything else sucks.
plan iterations/sprints
let team do task time estimations
pair programming (gets you better code)
code reviews (builds trust)
weekly in house "techtalks" to build a strong sense for the team
twitter like communication tool to keep all insync and informed with minimal distraction
develop team towards dynamic languages (groovy, scala, ...)
yourself, listen to what the guys at http://manager-tools.com/ have to say...
good luck!

We have been using:
version control:
subversion - Its not distributed but it is accessible over a few different protocols if firewalls are an issue. I'm not sure if distributed version control is necessary for us and reading Eric Sink's take is entertaining at least
issue tracking :
Fogbugz - You get some team discussion and communication for free with it because of the built-in wiki and discussion boards.
continuous integration:
CruiseControl - we had been talking about switching to Hudson, but Cruise is working really well right now - it runs our unit tests.
dev environment:
Netbeans and Eclipse - There is really no reason to pay for a Java IDE. An import point for getting going fast is that Netbeans and Eclipse both store all of their project data as text files which version control nicely. See this question. We had giant headaches when using an IDE which used binary project files.
profiler:
JDK VisualVM - Its free and it works. I used to really like YourKit, but VisualVM does so much now.
documention:
Combination of javadoc and fogbugz wiki pages plus the cruise dashboard for internal. For external we are using RoboHelp and we dislike it.
other tools:
Findbugs - huge help in catching things that are sometimes really stupid and sometimes amazing quirks that you'd have never realized. PMD is good for some of this as well.
We find chat tools to be really helpful for communication. We used to have access to Sametime and it had a giant conferencing feature that was really great. That was taken away for an unknown reason by the overlords though.

Here is what development stack our team of five developers is using over a year now:
Eclipse IDE (worked better for us than NetBeans)
Maven as a project comprehension and build tool -- simply a must tool!
Nexus: The Maven Repository Manager -- serves as a local Maven repo for proxying, and for managing internal and 3rd party libs; simple in use and is really necessary if you're going to use Maven
Subversion for source versioning -- was chosen mainly due to very good IDE support (Subclipse for Eclipse IDE)
Trac as a bug tracking and requirement management tool -- it nicely integrates with Subversion, has very useful plugins including blog and discussion plugins; also it can be integrated with Eclipse Mylyn.
Hudson as continuous integration, which nicely integrates with Subversion, Maven and Trac -- very valuable even for a small team.
Sonar code quality management platform -- a tool which integrates a large number of code quality matrix with intuitive web interface supporting code review and drill-down facility for analysis of the problems; integrates with Maven.
In our case this development stack is running under Ubuntu (workstation components: Eclipse IDE, Maven) and CentOS (server components: Maven, Nexus, Subversion, Trac, Hudson, Sonar).
As for the documentation, LaTeX (TexLive and Kile under Ubuntu) works just great supporting high quality PDF generation. The documentation source can be managed by Subversion the same way as the application source. Allows making of simple several page document and large multi-chapter books.
Hope this helps.

Distributed source code/revision control (Subversion?)
Subversion is good enough unless you want to use this as an opportunity to learn Git or Mercurial.
Bug tracking (does Trac do this?)
Trac works fine if you don't mind CamelCaseTurningIntoWikiWords. JIRA is fancier but (as noted) not free, and I find its data-ink ratio annoyingly low. Good once you learn which parts of the UI to ignore, though.
documentation (both internal and customer facing)
Internally, I would prefer communication over documentation unless you're really willing to commit to spending time keeping internal documentation updated. Javadoc your integration points (internal/external APIs), but try to keep your code and build scripts as self-documenting as you can.
That said, requirements docs are useful. I'd suggest using one tracking system for bugs and requirements. JIRA lets you create hierarchical issues, but I wouldn't bother with that till you need it.
Trac includes a Wiki, which can be handy although too much content will get stale.
Customer-facing docs are all over the map -- depends a lot on what you're doing. If you need big fat manuals (either printed or HTML or on-line help) FrameMaker + the DITA Open Toolkit is a nice combo, but a FrameMaker license is going to set you back $1000.
At a certain point this shades into corporate communications (marcom and PR), which are kind of a different animal.
team communication
Google Talk (or the instant messaging framework of your choice), email, and the occasional Skype teleconference are probably all you need.
An internal wiki and/or internal blogs might be nice but you probably don't need them right away, even once you've added a few more developers. Trac includes a wiki.
frequent automated building
Switching from CruiseControl to Hudson has made everyone here much happier -- two teams made the same decision independently and both are pleased with it. Hudson's flexible, easy to configure, and shiny.
I have yet to be convinced by Maven. I suspect its value depends on how much you want automated downloads of the latest versions of all your open-source libraries.
Edited (Feb. 2010) to add: Several months of Maven 2 experience now and I'm still not convinced. I think (like many frameworks, e.g. Rails) it may work well if you're starting from scratch and structuring your project according to its conventions, but if you already have your own structure in place it's a lot less advantageous.
maybe something to make sure automatic tests pass as part of the check-in process?
I'd advise against it. Most of the time the tests will be passing (or should be, anyway) As long as continuous integration notifies you quickly of failures, and you also have stable automated builds (a couple of days' worth of nightly builds, tagged iteration builds, etc.), you want more and faster checkins, not fewer and slower.

Subversion is not a distributed approach -- go for Mercurial, Bazaar or git instead!
Yes, Trac does do bug tracking (among other things -- check it out!).
Documentation is indeed a must but I'm not sure what you're asking -- tools for it? Why not just javadoc?
For communication you can have many tools, such as skype, email, IM of many kinds, and so forth -- you need to express your specific issues better to get specific advice, I think. Google Wave once it matures may be just great, but it's not production-ready yet.
For continuous build check out CruiseControl -- of course it also run tests &c.
You can write "triggers" for any of the build systems I've mentioned (and even good old svn;-) to run some test suite and reject the commit if it fails.

A few more items:
IDE
Billing Software - will you be charging by the
hour? If so you might want to track
what your time is going towards.
offsite backup of some kind.
Each one of your bullet points is probably worthy of a community wiki by themselves. Though in the end you might not care so much about best of breed in each area, but care more about how well they all integrate with your IDE or with each other.
Also, if you really want to get new teammates up and running quickly, consider putting as much of your dev environment into source control as you can, so you can just checkout your "dev-env" project onto a new computer and be up and running instantly!

One of your specs (in your question) says:
maybe something to make sure automatic
tests pass as part of the check-in
process?
I would suggest this is essential. Check out this matrix of continuous integration servers to see which one fits your requirements.

If you're starting off with just yourself as the only developer but scaling up at some point, depending on what it is you're developing, it might be worth to check out a Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering, like https://www.openshift.com or https://www.heroku.com/, both which offer developer accounts, but you can scale up to paid accounts as and when needed.
OpenShift have CI cartridges for Jenkins so you can spin up DVCS (git), CI using Jenkins, and an app server like JBoss AS or WildFly all in one go in a matter of minutes... depending on your needs and how much time you want to dedicate to setting this up yourself locally, I'd be more inclined to look at using a PaaS.

Rather than use Trac, consider Redmine. It allows you to have multiple projects stored in the one issue tracking system. You can then use the same setup for each project, rather than having to have N instances of Trac.

For starters, SVN will be enough for you. Definitely get a bugtracker. JIRA is good but isn't free. Enforce a rule "No commits without a bugtrecker ticket". This way you will be able to track the development. Do a cruise control and run a build + unit tests after every checkin into the main branch. Bigger changes should be made on a separate branch and then merged into the main branch.
Invest in a good IDE (I recommend intelliJ IDEA) and a good profiler (I recommend JProfiler). They're not free, but they are definitely worth their price.

Organizing Java projects [closed]

Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm a junior developer and recently started working for a very small office where they do a lot of in-house development. I have never worked in a project that involved more than one developer or were as big and complex as these ones.
The problem is that they don't use all the tools available (version control, automated building, continuous integration, etc) to their full extent: mainly a project is one big project in eclipse/netbeans using cvs for version control and everything checked in (including library jars), they started using branching for the first time when I started doing branches for small tasks and merging them back. As the projects get bigger and more complex, problems start to arise with dependencies, project structure tied to an IDE, building can be a PITA sometimes, etc. It's hectic at best.
What I want is to set up a development environment where most of these problems will go away and I will save time and effort. I would like to set up projects in a manner independent of IDE used using version control (I'm leaning towards SVN right now), avoid dependency messes and automate building as much as possible.
I know that there are multiple approaches and tools for this and do not want to see a holy war started, I would really appreciate practical recommendations based on experience and what you have found to be useful when facing similar problems. All projects are Java projects and range from web applications to "generic" ones, and I use Eclipse most of the time, but also use Netbeans if needed. Thanks in advance.

You seem to be almost exactly in the point where the place I worked at was when I started there 1,5 years ago, only difference being that you've started toying with branches which is actually something we still don't do at my work but more about that later on in this answer.
Anyway, you're listing a very good set of tools which can help a small company and those work really nicely as subtopics so without further ado,
Version control systems
Most commonly small companies currently use CVS or SVN and there's nothing bad in that, in fact I'd be really worried if no version control was really used at all. However you have to use version control right, just having one won't make your life easier. We currently use CVS and are looking into Mercurial, but we've found that the following works as a good set of conventions when working with CVS (and I'd suspect SVN too):
Have separate users for all commiters. It's beyond valuable to know who commited what.
Don't allow empty commit messages. In fact if possible, configure the repository to reject any commits without comments and/or default comment. Initial commit for FooBarizer is better than Empty log message
Use tags to mark milestones, prototypes, alphas, betas, release candidates and final versions. Don't use tags for experimental work or as footnotes/Post-It notes.
Don't use branches since they really don't work if you're continuing on developing the application. This is mainly because in CVS and SVN branching just doesn't work as expected and it becomes an exercise in futility to maintain any more than two living branches ( head and any secondary branch ) over time.
Always remember that for the software company the source code is your source of income and contains all your business value, so treat it that way. Also if you have extra 70 minutes, I really recommend that you watch through this talk Linus Thorvalds gave at Google about git and (d)VCS in general, it's really insightful.
Automated builds and Continuous Integration environments
These are about the same actually. Daily builds is a PR joke and has little no resemblance to the state of the actual software beyond some very rudimentary "Does it compile?" issues. You can compile a lot of awful code noise that doesn't do anything, keeping the software quality up has nothing to do with getting the code to compile.
On the other hand unit tests is a great way to maintain software quality and I can with a bit of personal pride say that rigorous unit testing helps even the worst of the programmers to improve a lot and catch stupid errors. In fact there has so far only been a total of three bugs that code I have written has reached production environments and I'd say that in 18 months that's a pretty damn good achievement. In our new production code we usually have a instruction code coverage of +80%, mostly +90% and in one special case reaching all the way to 98%. This part is very lively field and you're better of Googling for the following: TDD, BDD, unit tests, integration tests, acceptance tests, xUnit, mock objects.
That's a bit of a lengthy preface, I know. The actual meat for all the above is this: If you want to have automated builds, have them occur every time someone commits and make sure there's a constantly increasing and improving amount of unit tests for production code. Have the continuous integration system of your choice (we use Hudson CI) run all the unit tests related to project and only accept builds if all the tests pass. Do not make any compromises! If unit tests show that the software is broken, fix the software.
Additionally, Continuous Integration systems aren't just for compiling code but instead they should be used for tracking the state of the software project's metrics. For Hudson CI I can recommend all these plugins:
Checkstyle - Checks if the actual source code is written in a way you define. Big part of writing maintainable code is to use common conventions.
Cobertura - Code coverage metrics, very useful to see how the coverage develops over time. Also keeping in line with the "source is God" mentality, allows you to discard builds if coverage falls below a certain level.
Task Scanner - Simple but sweet: Scans for specific tags such as BUG, TODO, NOTE etc. in your code and creates a list from them for everyone to read. Simple way to track short notes or known bugs which needs fixing or whatever you can come up with.
Project structure and Dependency Management
This is a controversial one. Basically everyone agrees that having an unified structure is great but since there's several camps with different requirements, habits and views to issue they tend to disagree. For example Maven people really believe that there's only one way - the Maven way - to do things and that's it while Ivy supporters believe that the project structure shouldn't be hammered down your throat by external parties, only the dependencies need to be managed properly and in an unified manner. Just that it's not left unclear, our company simply loves Ivy.
So since we don't use project structure imposed by external parties, I'm going to tell you a bit about how we got into what we got into our current project structure.
In the beginning we used individual projects for actual software and related tests (usually named Product and Product_TEST). This is very close to what you have, one huge directory for everything with the dependencies as JARs directly included in the directory. What we did was that we checked out both projects from CVS and then linked the actual project to the test software project in Eclipse as runtime dependency. A bit clunky but it worked.
We soon came to realize that these extra steps are completely useless since by using Ant - by the way, you can invoke Ant tasks directly in Hudson - we could tell the JAR/WAR building step to ignore everything by either file name (say, everything that ends with Test or TestCase) or by source folder. Pretty soon we converted our software project to use a simple structure two root folders, src and test. We haven't looked back ever since. The only debate we currently have is if we should allow for a third folder called spikes to exist in our standard project structure and that's not a very heated debate at all.
This has worked tremendously well and doesn't require any additional support or plugins from any of IDEs out there which is a great plus - number two reason we didn't choose Maven was seeing how M2Eclipse basically took over Eclipse. And since you must be wondering, number one reason for rejecting Maven was the clunkiness of Maven itself, endless amount of lengthy XML declarations for configuration and the related learning curve was considered a too big cost as to what we would get from using it.
Rather interestingly later on commiting to Ivy instead of Maven has allowed us to a smooth shift to do some Grails development which uses folder and class names as conventions for just about everything when structuring the web application.
Also a final note about Maven, while it claims to promote convention over configuration, if you don't want to do things exactly the way the Maven's structure says you should do things, you're in a world of pain for the aforementioned reasons. Certainly that's an expected side effect of having conventions but no convention shouldn't be final, there always has to be at least some room for changes, bending the rules or choosing the appropriate from a certain set.
In short, my opinion is that Maven is a bazooka, you work in a house and you ultimate goal is to have it bug free. Each of these are good on it's own and work even if you pick any two of them, but the three together just doesn't work.
Final words
As long as you have less than 10 code-centric people, you have all the flexibility needed to do the important decisions. When you go beyond that, you have to live with whatever choices you've made, no matter how good or bad they are. Don't just believe things you hear on the Internet, sit down and test everything rigorously - heck, our senior tech guy even wrote his bachelor's thesis about Java web frameworks just to figure out which one we should use - and really figure out what you really need. Don't commit to anything just because you may need some of the functionality it provides in distant future, pick those things that has the lowest possible negative impact to the whole company. Being the 10th person hired to the company I work at I can undersign everything in this paragraph with my own blood, we currently have 16+ people working and changing certain conventions would actually be a bit scary at this point.

Our development stack (team of 10+ developers)
Eclipse IDE with M2Eclipse and Subclipse/Subversive
Subversion for source control, some developers also use TortoiseSVN where Subclipse fails
Maven 2 for project configuration (dependencies, build plugins) and release mgmt (automatic tagging of releases)
Hudson for Continuous Integration (creates also snapshot releases with source attachments and reports)
Archiva for artifact repository (multiple repositories, e.g. releases and snapshots are separated)
Sonar for code quality tracking (e.g. hotspots, coverage, coding guidelines adherence)
JIRA for bug tracking
Confluence for developer wiki and communication of tech docs with other departments
Docbook for manuals (integrated into build)
JMeter for stress testing and long-term performance monitoring
Selenium/WebDriver for automated browser integration tests
Jetty, Tomcat, Weblogic and Websphere as test environments for web apps. Products are deployed every night and automated tests are run on distributed Hudsons.
Mailinglist with all developers for announcements, general info mails
Daily stand up meetings where everbody tells about what he's currently doing
This setup is considered standard for our company as many departments are using those tools and there is a lot of experience and community support for those.
You are absolutely right about trying to automate as much as possible. If your collegues start to see the benefits when aspects of the development phases are automated, they will be encouraged to improve on their own. Of course, every new technology gimmick ("tool") is a new burden and has to be managed and maintained. This is where the effort is moved. You save time e.g. when maven automatically performs your releases, but you will waste time on managing maven itself. My experience is that every time I introduced a new tool (one of the aboves), it takes time to be adopted and cared about, but in the end it will bring advantages to the whole team when real value is experienced - esp. in times of stress when the tools take over much of the work you would have to do manually.

A fine, admirable instinct. Kudos to you.
Part of your problem might not be solved using tools. I'd say that source code management needs some work, because it doesn't sound like branching, tagging, and merging is done properly. You'll need some training and communication to solve that.
I haven't used CVS myself, so I can't say how well it supports those practices. I will point out that Subversion and Git would be better choices. At worst, you should be reading the Subversion "red bean" book to get some generic advice on how to manage source code.
Personally, I'm not a Maven fan. I believe it's too heavyweight, especially when compared to Ant and Ivy. I'd say that using those with Cruise Control could be the solution to a lot of your problems.
You didn't mention unit testing. Start building TestNG and Fit tests into your build cycle.
Look into IntelliJ - I think its a better IDE than either Eclipse or NetBeans, but that's just me.
Best of luck.

Maven is great, however, it can have a fair bit of a learning curve, and it requires that the project fits a very specific file structure. If you have a big legacy project, it may be difficult to mavenize it. In that case, Ant+Ivy would do the same without the stringent requirements that maven has.
For build automation, Hudson is beyond awesome. I've used a couple different systems, but that is unquestionably the easiest to get set up and administer.

I recommend to use Maven for building your projects. Using Maven brigns value to the project, because:
Maven promotes convention over configuration what equals a good project structure
thanks Maven plugins eases generating projects for IDE's (Eclipse, Netbeans, Idea)
handles all dependecies and complete build lifecycle
faciliates projects modularization (via mulitimodule projects)
helps with releases/versions burden
improve code quality - easy integration with continous integration servers and lot of code quality plugins

Maven can be a bit daunting given its initial learning curve, but it would nicely address many of your concerns. I also recommend you take a look at Git for version control.

For project and repository management, I use trac with subversion.

Here's what i'm using right now, but i will probably switch a few parts (see the end of this post).
Eclipse as IDE with a few plugins : JADClipse (to decompile .class on the fly, pretty useful), DBViewer for a quick access to database through Eclipse, WTP (Web Tools Platform) integrated into Eclipse for running Tomcat 6 as a developement web server (pretty fast), Mylyn (linked with JIRA bug-tracker).
I'm too wondering about "IDE independant projects", right now we are all sticked on Eclipse - Eclipse project files (.project, .classpath, .settings) are even commited in the CVS repository (in order to have a project fully ready once checked out) - but with Netbeans, supported by Sun and running faster and faster with each release (and each new JRE version), the question isn't closed.
CVS for storing projects, with nearly no branches (only for patches).
I'm working on environment production with Oracle SGBDR but I'm using HSQLDB on my developement computer to make test and build and development process way faster (with the help of the open-source DDLUtils tool to ease database creation and data injections). Otherwise i use SQLWorkbench for quick BD tasks (including schemas comparison) or the Oracle (free) SQLDeveloper for some Oracle specific tasks (like investating sessions locks and so on).
Tests are only JUnit tests (either simple unit test cases or more complex test cases (nearly "integrations" ones), nearly always runing on HSQLDB to run faster.
My build system is Ant (launched from Eclipse) for various small tasks (uploading a war on a remote server for example) and (mainly) Maven 2 for :
the build process
the publishing of the released artefacts
the publishing of the project's web site (including reports)
launching tests campaigns (launched every night)
The continuous integration front-end is Luntbuild, and the front-end for the Maven repository is Archiva.
All this works. But I'm pretty disappointed by a few elements of this ecosystem.
Mainly Maven, it's just too time-consuming and i have a lot of griefs versus this tool. Conflicts dependencies resolution is a joke. Lot of XML lines in every POM.xml, redundant in every project (even with the help of a few POM roots). Plugins are way too inconsistent, buggy, and it's really difficult to find clear documentation explaining what has to be configured, and so on.
So i'm wondering about switching from Maven to ANT+Ivy. For what i've seen so far, it's seems pretty cool (there are various Conflict manager for the conflicts dependencies resolutions and you can even write your own conflict manager), there is no need to have an additionnal tool installed and configured (as ANT is running natively under Eclipse, whereas Maven needs a separate plugin - i've tried the 3 Mavens plugins by the way, and have found all the three of them buggy).
However Maven 3 is on its way, i'll give it a try but i don't expect it to be fundamentaly different from Maven 2.
Hudson would seem a better choice than Luntbuild, too, but this part won't be changed for the now.
And Subversion will probably replace CVS in a near future (even if i nearly don't have any trouble with CVS).

Lots of good advice here. I have just a few additions:
I think that, unlike the rest, an IDE is a personal tool, and each developer should have some freedom to select the one that works best for him. (For example, many love Eclipse, while I ditched it for NetBeans because Maven integration was, uh, problematic in Eclipse.)
I thought I was going to hate Maven, but now I get along with it fairly well. The main problem I have these days is finding out where the conventions are documented.
I would advise introducing tools one at a time. If you try to mechanize all aspects of software development at a by-hand shop in one stroke, there will likely be massive resistance. Make your business case and get agreement on one good common tool, or just get permission to set it up for your use but in a commonly-accessible way and let people see what it does for you. After a few of these, people will develop a habit of wondering how aspect X could be automated, so additional tools should be easier to introduce.

The single most best thing you can do without disrupting other people and their way of working is setting up hudson to watch the CVS repository for each of your project. Just doing that will give a central place to see cvs commit messages.
Next step is getting these projects to compile under Hudson. For Eclipse this typically means either switching to ant or - as we did - use ant4eclipse to model the existing eclipse build process. Not easy but very worthwhile. Remember to send out mails when the build breaks - this is extremely important. Ant4eclipse requires team project sets - introducing them in your organization Will make your colleagues happy the next time they need to set up a fresh workspace.
When you have a situation where your stuff builds properly whenever somebody commits changes then consider making that automatically built code the code to actually go to the customer. As it was built on the build server and not on a developers machine, you know that you can reproduce the build. That is invaluable in a "hey fix this ancient version" situation.

Java development standards and tools (compared to C#)

I don't have any knowledge of Java platform and I wonder which tools (and methodologies) could be used to help developing maintainable code written in Java.
I know one can use:
Agile methodology in any environment
jUnit/jMock for unit testing code (similar to NUnit/Moq in .net world)
Checkstyle for coding standards - is this similar to StyleCop or FxCop or both?
I suppose you can also write layered applications in Java (like assemblies for different tiers in .net)
Are there any automated testing OSS/Licensed tools that are worth mentioning
Are there any code generators that are very popular in Java world
Are there also any other popular tools/methods that a Java developer/team can use that I don't have access to in .net world? Would you suggest other tools and approaches in Java world?

In java there are a lot of frameworks. For example, you don't have to use JUnit, you could use TestNG with basically just as much tool support. There are several mocking frameworks as well.
In terms of coding standards, IDEs come with that built in, as well as there being several others available (I'm most familiar with the IDE ones, so I don't know names off hand).
You have Eclipse as an IDE if you want free, as well as NetBeans and for money there is IntelliJ IDEA among others. Then there are some IDEs from big vendors intended to support their specific application servers.
In terms of building "assemblies" (jars, wars and ears in the java world), there are some built in tools in IDEs for one-man projects, and there is Ant or Maven for a full fledged build tool.
There are many options in automated testing tools. If you mean continuous integration, there is CruiseControl that is free, and TeamCity which has no cost for low usage.
In terms of code generators, in general the Java world is kind of trying to move away from them in favor of annotations, but the name that comes to mind is xdoclet. In GUI building there are a bunch of code generators strictly for building the GUI of course.
That really barely scratches the surface. For example, application servers (JBoss, Oracle (they now own two with the Sun purchase) and IBM among others) are a big decision point in many Java projects (it depends what kind of project).
None of the categories discussed are intended to be exhaustive, just enough to give you a jumping point of what to look into. There are many more in each category.
The great thing about Java is that there are so many choices. The bad thing about Java is that there are so many choices ...

Responding to #2: Code coverage tools like EMMA are often used to evaluate the extent of current tests.
Responding to #5: Findbugs and PMD are extremely popular static analysis tools.

You can use Hudson together with ant or maven as an continuous integration server. Testing your code at specific times and after each checkin. You can combinte Hudson with JUnit, Emma, FindBugs, Pmd and checkstyle to measure the quality of the code in your repository. If you are doing this I recommend installing the continuous integration game giving your developer a high score for fixing tests and warnigns, and negative points for breaking them.

The best tool for Java development is great Java programmers.
If you manage to hire a few that are really good, the rest will take care of itself :)

I'm not convinced that any one set of tools/methodologies/processes will guarantee you get maintaniable code at the end of it. So much of this comes down to the programmers who develop the project. Are they craftsmen/women committed to producing excellent code or just code-cutters aiming to get the job done. Looking at it another way, it's possible to have great processes in place and still produce poor code. And great programmers can produce maintainable code despite poor processess/tools or the lack of them.
That said, I'd still insist on the basics: source code control, branching for each change with regular check-ins to the main branch, automated build and test, lots of test code, basic static analysis, bug tracking and so on. That's on the tool side. On the coding side, regular design and code reviews, n-tiered architecture, loose coupling, etc. Most of this is language independent. So what's been working for you in C# should translate to Java.
For Java, I've found JUnit very good for test code and Checkstyle pretty good for maintaining a coding style.