I need to retrieve a list of given entities (apples) from another resource (fruitDelaer) I know I can do smt like this (somewhere in my fruitDealer resource implementation):
ClientResource applesResource = new ClientResource("http://localhost:8888/fruitShop/apples");
Representation response = applesResource.get();
But since this 'apples' resource is local to the one it's invoking it, is there a way not to specify the full url?
NOTE: I suspect this may have more to do with Java itself than restlet
Restlet offers the RIAP pseudo-protocol (Restlet Internal Access Protocol), which lets you do exactly that, invoke resources local to your application|virtual host|component using an URI such as "riap://application/fruitShop/apples".
Additional details here.
I would consider another approach. A Service that you could call from fruitDealer to retrieve what you need. There is a lot of work to be done creating objects and such that is not necessary.
Related
I have a spring boot application with the following context path:
server.servlet.context-path:/api
I need to write a rest controller that's mapped to
http://localhost:8080/logout
instead of http://localhost:8080/api/logout
Is there a way to achieve this? changing the "server.servelt.context-path" value is not an option.
this is what I tried and didn't work:
#GetMapping(value="../signout"){
public void logout(){
}
Nero, you say you can't change the "server.servlet.context-path" value. I bet you say this because you don't want to break the API, but I think you can manage to change this without breaking the API. Set the context-path to blank, which is permitted. Then in your application change the "api" mapping, which I assume is currently "/", to "api".
Change server.servlet.context-path:/api to server.servlet.context-path:/ or maybe server.servlet.context-path: (no slash). (Supposedly this is the default so you might just remove this entry altogether.)
Somewhere in your application change #RequestMapping("/") to #RequestMapping("/api").
Now you can also have #GetMapping(value="/signout") and you will have resources at http://localhost:8080/logout and http://localhost:8080/api.
I don't know what mapping annotations you happen to be using, but hopefully this is clear enough.
It may not be possible within that application to go outside its context root. Maybe you can create a separate Rest service app for that particular url and take it from there.
I have two instances of clients with different configs that I am creating (timeout, threadpool, etc...), and would like to leverage Dropwizard's metric on both of the clients.
final JerseyClientBuilder jerseyClientBuilder = new JerseyClientBuilder(environment)
.using(configuration.getJerseyClientConfiguration());
final Client config1Client = jerseyClientBuilder.build("config1Client");
environment.jersey().register(config1Client);
final Client config2Client = jerseyClientBuilder.build("config2Client");
environment.jersey().register(config2Client);
However, I am getting
org.glassfish.jersey.internal.Errors: The following warnings have been detected:
HINT: Cannot create new registration for component type class org.glassfish.jersey.client.JerseyClient:
Existing previous registration found for the type.
And only one client's metric shows up.
How do I track both clients' metrics or is it not common to have 2 clients in a single dropwizard app?
Never mind, turned out I was an idiot (for trying to save some resource on the ClientBuilder).
2 Things that I did wrong with my original code:
1. You don't need to register Jersey clients, just the resource is enough... somehow I missed the resource part in my code and just straight up trying to register the client
2. You need to explicitly build each JerseyClientBuilder and then build your individually configured clients, then dropwizard will fetch by each JerseyClientBuilder's metrics
In the end, I just had to change my code to the following:
final Client config1Client = new JerseyClientBuilder(environment)
.using(configuration.getJerseyClientConfiguration()).build("config1Client");
final Client config2Client = new JerseyClientBuilder(environment)
.using(configuration.getJerseyClientConfiguration()).build("config2Client");
Doh.
environment.jersey().register() has a javadoc listing of Adds the given object as a Jersey singleton component meaning that the objects registered become part of the jersey dependency injection framework. Specifically this method is used to add resource classes to the jersey context, but any object with an annotation or type that Jersey looks for can be added this way. Additionally, since they are singletons you can only have one of them per any concrete type (which is why you are getting a "previous registration" error from Jersey).
I imagine that you want to have two Jersey clients to connect to two different external services via REST/HTTP. Since your service needs to talk to these others to do its work, you'll want to have the clients accessible wherever the "work" or business logic is being performed.
For example, this guide creates a resource class that requires a client to an external http service to do currency conversions. I'm not saying this is a great example (just a top google result for dropwizard external client example). In fact, I think this not a good to structure your application. I'd create several internal objects that hide from the resource class how the currency information is fetched, like a business object (BO) or data access object (DAO), etc.
For your case, you might want something like this (think of these as constructor calls). JC = jersey client, R = resource object, BO = business logic object
JC1()
JC2()
B1(JC1)
B2(JC2)
R1(B1)
R2(B2)
R3(B1, B2)
environment.jersey().register(R1)
environment.jersey().register(R2)
environment.jersey().register(R3)
The official Dropwizard docs are somewhat helpful. They at least explain how to create a jersey client; they don't explain how to structure your application.
If you're using the Jersey client builder from dropwizard, each of the clients that you create should be automatically registered to record metrics. Make sure you're using the client builder from the dropwizard-client artifact and package io.dropwizard.client. (Looks like you are because you have the using(config) method.)
When developing a Web Application in Java, launching in Tomcat, I need to be able to create (dynamically) a new static address (link,URL) in the server that will be used to view the information of a new item, let's call it new_item_001, which have been just created by one user.
Say I want to create a new address
www.domain.com/webapp/items/new_item_001
which can be used to render a view of the contents of new_item_001.
Which is the best approach to do this?
Should I dynamically create a new servlet class for this view?
Should I dynamically create the folder items and one html file new_item_001 for this item inside of it?
Should I edit the server address mapping rules to create this static address and map it to a central servlet which somehow knows which item to display?
I understand the question is ill posed, and that I am far from even understanding the issue, so I would like some guidelines on what to look for.
None of the above.
You should simply have a servlet mapped to /items/*. When a request come to this servlet, analyze the actual path of the request, extract the part after /items/ to know the actual value (new_item_001) in your example, get the data corresponding to this item from the database, and send it to the browser.
Using a true MVC framework like Spring MVC would make that much easier. You could simply map a method of a controller using
#RequestMapping("/items/{itemId}")
public Item getItem(#PathVariable("itemId") String itemId) {
...
}
and let the framework do all the URL parsing for you.
I would like to tackle this in a simple way. Creating a servlet for each created item would be overkill and become quite cumbersome to manage after a successful run of the application for some time.
Changing/editing server mapping URL looks very naive approach and is not scaling too. Let configuration be there and change them only when you actually need to change them.
My suggestion is to create one servlet that handles all these requests. For example, you may save item information on a datastore or on file system(i.e images uploaded by user etc..). Next time a GET request is received by the application to fetch saved information of an item, servlet should be able to reference the item on database associated with the item id on the URL. If you don't wish to expose item id/surrogate key in the database, you can also have a simple mapping between them by implementing your own logic. Frameworks like Spring MVC do a good job in mapping URLs to resources like this should you wish to use a framework.
Additionally to minimize the number of requests to the same item, you can also implement an HTTP caching strategy(i.e. ETAG, If-Modified-Since) by instructing your web server at the time of first GET request from a user.
I am designing a REST API that I would like to be localizable in the future.
Therefore I am defining the URLs to be of the form
/en/<resource_url>
With the intention of being able to support
/fr/<resource_url>
In the future if need be.
However I only want to define each resource url service once. Therefore I figure I need to get the URL parsed and rewritten without the language piece of the URL before it is matched to services. Finally that language should be made available to the services somehow for them to localize if necessary.
How can I achieve this?
I am using Jersey 1.17 inside Jetty container embedded in a larger server process.
You can make the /en/ or the /fr/ part a variable. Then set your locale to the value of the variable. Here's an example:
#Path("/{locale}/username")
public class UserResource {
#GET
#Produces("text/xml")
public String getUser(#PathParam("locale") String locale) {
...
}
}
But that may not be the best way to go about it. After answering, I found this other SO question that is a better way to solve the problem: Getting the client locale in a jersey request With this way, you don't need to add this to the URL. Just make the client set a header.
With Spring MVC, I know how you set the RequestMapping in every controller and method/action.
But what if I wanted this to be configurable, so for example I the following controllers:
BlogController
- with methods for listing blogs entries, single entry, new, update, etc.
ArticleController
- with methods for listing articles entries, single entry, new, update, etc.
Now in my application, the administrator can setup 2 blogs for the webiste, and 1 article section so the urls would be like:
www.example.com/article_section1/ - uses ArticleController
www.example.com/blog1/ - uses BlogController
www.example.com/blog2/ - uses BlogController
Maybe after a while the administrator wants another article section, so they just configure that with a new section like:
www.example.com/article_section2/
This has to work dynamically/on-the-fly without having to restart the application of course.
My question is only concerned with how I will handle url mappings to my controllers.
How would this be possible with Spring MVC?
I only know how to map urls to controllers using #RequestMapping("/helloWorld") at the controller or method level, but this makes the url mappings fixed and not configurable like how I want it.
Update:
I will be storing the paths in the database, and with the mapping to the type of controller so like:
path controller
/article_section1/ article
/blog1/ blog
/blog2/ blog
..
With the above information, how could I dispatch the request to the correct controller?
Again, not looking to reload/redeploy, and I realize this will require more work but its in the spec :)
Would this sort of URL mapping work for you?
www.example.com/blog/1/
www.example.com/blog/2/
If yes, then that's easy: Spring 3 supports path variables: http://static.springsource.org/spring/docs/3.0.x/reference/mvc.html#mvc-ann-requestmapping-advanced
Alternatively, you can create a generic request mapping and your own sub-dispatcher that reads a config file, but I think that's probably more work than it's worth.
Truly changing the request mappings at runtime might be hard (and not really recommended, since small errors can easily occur). If you still wish to do it, perhaps JRebel, and more specificly LiveRebel can be interesting for live redeployment of code and configuration.
Otherwise, like other posts suggested, RequestMappings supports wildcards, the limits of this should be clear after a quick read of the official documentation.
Try using with #RequestMapping wild cards as below:
#RequestMapping(value="/article_section*/"}
public void getArticle(....){
//TODO implementation
}
#RequestMapping(value="/blog*/"}
public void getBlog(....){
//TODO implementation
}
Hope this helps!!!
Also another solution might be to create a custom annotation that holds the already defined path on the #RequestMapping and also the new one to apply, let's say #ApiRestController.
Then, before the Spring context loads, the #Controller classes can be changed to have their annotation values changed at runtime by the new one (with the desired path). By doing this, Spring will load the enhanced request mapping and not the default one.
Created a small project to exemplify this for someone that needs this in the future https://gitlab.com/jdiasamaro/spring-api-rest-controllers.
Hope it helps.
Cheers.
doesn't this work?
#RequestMapping("/helloWorld*")