Related
Im working on coding a WYSIWYG document designer. The basic intent of this designer is to be capable of both reading(loading) and creating multiple documents written in a variety of templating languages (ZPL, XSL-FO etc).
Now for the sake of building a WYSIWYG designer, i plan to have an elegant UI which the user can play around with to create/edit the document.
The compulsory needs of the UI is that --
The UI should be such that the user must be able to pick or
choose elements and be able to drop them off on the UI. Once
dropped, the position of the elements should be capable of allowing
repositioning.
The UI must associate the spatial postioning of elements to the
element's metadata (say, x coordinate,y coordinate, height ,width
etc).
The UI must be capable of seamlessly passing on the elements and
their spatial positions to a backend module,written in Java, that
would wither edit or create the document in the specified templating
language.
Im having trouble in deciding what to implement the UI in. I tried Swing and found it to be not great(was pretty rigid for my needs). Any suggestions with regard to what can be used to build the UI described above would be of immense help.
Your underpinnings options are pretty much Swing or SWT.
Not sure what you mean by "rigid"; Swing is a pretty good GUI framework architecturally, although some prefer SWT. Not sure how JavaFX will end up, but it has some nice features.
XUI layers on top. Or take the Griffon approach, although I'm not sure it's a great fit for the type of application you're working on. Or use Groovy/JRuby/etc. to make many aspects of working with Swing/etc. less painful.
IIRC there are Java bindings for QT as well, if the QT licensing works for you.
Perhaps you'll be better served by some rich client platform (RCP) like Eclipse or NetBeans. Both are probably best known as IDEs, but the IDEs are actually built on top of the respective platforms. Using an RCP will take a lot of responsibility out of your hands. Existing plugins/modules can be made to interoperate with your code and facilities such as perspectives (Eclipse) or rearranging panels are accounted for.
Like Dave Newton hinted at, JavaFX could also be a candidate. JavaFX 2.0 is now out and no longer requires the scripting language used in 1.0, instead opting for a Java API that'll feel more natural to experienced Java developers. And it can be used within Swing.
I have a new application to write, and the timeline is tight - I'd like to overview the requirements and why I'm considering Portlets over Servlets; however, I have no experience with Portlets and therefore would like someone who is familiar to let me know if I'm missing anything, or if I'm doomed to spend too much time learning the new technology.
Project Requirements Overview :
I need to build a system that allows clients to build simple websites through our own UI (the building tools must be completely customizable as I'm working with a talented design team) - think of a "easy as 1,2,3" page builder where you specify templates, content, etc. Of course we also need to be prepared to handle special requests where clients or internal people can tweak the pages. Also, we will offer special components and pages that interact with our back-end system.
Each client website must be linked to a separate domain
I should be able to create multiple interfaces for editing pages and content - so that more advanced users are able to make more advanced changes
A web designer without programming skills can create templates for the look and feel of the sites - while developers can then add the dynamic functionality
Why I'm Considering Portlets :
As I drew up extravagant designs, the one thing I keep coming to is realizing, this is going to be difficult to deliver quickly, and the quicker I deliver, the more likely I am to have coded myself into a corner. So I wanted to be able to manage aspects of the application separately, but just don't have the time to do so (since it would be entirely on me to create that system). Also, in order to keep on time, I will need to delegate parts of the project carefully, if its totally home built I need to be REALLY careful what I delegate. Then I found out about "liferay" which lead me to investigate portlets.
So basically the Portlet architecture doesn't seem to prohibit anything I need, plus we can add all our special needs as hot deployed portlets - pages can be created as HTML and enhanced with Velocity - and if some requirements change, there is a standard I've adhered to and therefore can make changes to configuration. I may even want to use liferay as it does nearly everything I want (although I would need to provide a much simpler page editing interface).
Conclusion :
So that's the project requirements and why I'm thinking about going for portlets, but I'm not sure if it's really a fit, or if it just SEEMS like a fit, does it seem reasonable to those of your familiar with Portlets?
There's nothing you mention that speaks against adopting portlets - quite contrary: Sounds like a good fit.
The only tricky part might be that you don't have any portlet experience, so estimation will likely be a bit off while you learn this environment, but this would apply to every environment that you don't know yet. Compared with a servlet approach you'll start with quite a lot of functionality out of the box, so it sounds completely reasonable. And you don't even need to maintain this functionality yourself...
If you can you might want to consider getting trained in the environment of your choice to get to speed quickly. (You tagged the question with "liferay" and Liferay offers training all over the world - Disclaimer: I work for Liferay)
I'm a full time Java developer of around 4 years, professionally. I'm a GWT fanatic. I love Java. Here's the problem: In my free time I often fall victim to the verbosity of my favorite tools for doing "heavy" development. I also often fall into the trap of obsessively engineering my software. I'll end up with the most beautiful unfinished implementation, ever.
So, here's what I normally work with.
GWT - I use this for dynamic UI and web layout. I love the ease of re-use and it has taught me to absolutely hate javascript. I really can't even bring myself to do much HTML/JS anymore.
Hibernate - POJO to Database, easy-peasy. What i really need from this other than the mapping is that it allows me to have an application that works across multiple databases.
Spring - Mostly security. I've written my own custom LDAP bits for a project.
XML - I've used dom4j and other implementations, including xstreamer. I'd like to use JiBX for XML transport. The problem with this is that I need XML messages that conform to a specific standard rather than being autogenerated. Object->XML->Object are also common enough that it can be a performance bottleneck with large messages (250KB+).
I tried Lombok for a little while and liked it but had occasional issues with it and then I blew up a partition and lost all that work. I don't really feel like doing the same thing again (half the fun was in learning how to do it, now that I know... meh). This taught me why other people want to reduce the explicit code and replace it with an implicit system.
I've been looking into Grails but that runs me into the JavaScript problem (you know, that I don't like it) pretty quickly. I could use GWT with Grails on the back end but I get back into the problem of getting deep in the weeds with GWT. It has also occurred to me that there might be a way to have Grails tags in GSP that are made up of GWT widgets. I'm not really sure how I feel about that.
Another problem I have with Grails is that validation logic before form submission is separated from validation constraints after submission. I don't see how they can be unified (yet) to produce "pretty" front-end validation. I went out of my way to start a JSR-303 compliant validation project for GWT to help solve some of this problem for GWT and really liked the results. It isn't finished but I still find it useful.
So, help me find a better way!
TL;DR - I want to have a Database (and Database-Independent) to GUI solution that allows for dynamic web programming all in one language. Failing that, as close to one language as possible.
TL;DR is TL;DR - I hate JavaScript now, help.
EDIT: I know that it is techincally impossible to do "Web 2.0" development without JavaScript. I'm just trying to not be the guy who has to write it. (Getting a tool such as GWT to do it for me from a language I do like, for example.)
Just learn JavaScript.
Resistance is Futile
...and you will be assimilated.
PD: I'm an ex JavaScript enemy. Now it's my favourite language.
You can certainly develop an entire Web 2.0 project without coding Javascript using GWT (we have), but at the end of the day you still have to know HTML/CSS & Javascript.
This might sound like a stupid statement, but it's not once you consider that GWT is not a perfect abstraction, nor is it designed to be. It wasn't written in Java so that you didn't have to ever code in Javascript again, instead they did it because Java has better IDE's, is statically typed and makes maintenance a hell of a lot easier.
So yes, by all means go with GWT (and check out the new OOPHM, because it's AWESOME) but don't forget that you'll always need an understanding of the underlying frameworks of the web, if you want to develop for the web.
Have you heard of Echo?
It doesn't provide the database part of the problem, but it would work well with any database that you can work well with.
Echo is a platform for building
web-based applications that approach
the capabilities of rich clients. The
applications are developed using a
component-oriented and event-driven
API, eliminating the need to deal with
the "page-based" nature of browsers.
To the developer, Echo works just like
a user interface toolkit.
The latest iteration, Echo3, features
the ability to write applications in
either server-side Java or client-side
JavaScript. Server-side applications
run in any Java Servlet Container and
do not require developer knowledge of
HTML, HTTP, or JavaScript.
You might want to take a look at some of the AJAX powered JSF libraries. IceFaces and RichFaces are both solid.
Been there, done that. I was a GWT developer for 3 years... I started using it in v1.1! GWT is fantastic, and works really well for small applications. But the development comes to a crawl once you it a moderate application size, even if you divide your application in sub-modules.
It is also quite ironic that a UI framework has such limited UI creation tools. :)
Personally I bit the bullet and learned javascript. It isn't as bad as I thought. Especially with jQuery. :)
Obviously there is no perfect framework. But just the fact that GWT has been out for 3.5 years now, and it still largerly ignored in the Java world should tell you something. Since you're doing this on your free time, I would recommend learning the most popular framework: Struts. You'll see its limitation, and also why it is so popular. Of course, you'll need jQuery for that 2.0 functionalities. :)
Take a look at JRapid, a rapid development platform for Java developers. It generates very powerful Ajax enabled UI without the need of coding.
Not sure if you would like this , but have you heard about Haxe?
You might not like it but its AIO (all in one) solution (sort of).
I can understand your dislike of JavaScript and it certainly has its problems but I think your fighting nature at this point.
Web 2.0 is strongly based on JavaScript for a good reason as it provides the ability to perform tasks on the client machine without requiring page loads.
I'm sure there are alternatives but if you want the look and feel of Web 2.0, you will end up doing a lot more work with little reward. JavaScript is the accepted and functional tool for the job.
I'd say stick with GWT and just drink more of the Koolaid. It's a completely awesome development model that seems to be lost on those who haven't tried it.
If you want to improve your GWT experience, jump to the bleeding edge (I work off trunk, it's quite stable) and use the other Google originated projects like GIN, gwt-incubator and Guice. Especially watch Ray Ryan's GWT best-practices Google I/O talk: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PDuhR18-EdM
As for the "framework" part: forget 'em. Just use normal servlets and let GWT take care of the RPC for you. Servlets are a pain when you have to deal with JSP and you're own AJAX calls, but when they're only implementing asynchronous app logic, it's not that bad at all. Guice Servlet makes it all quite easy. You can still use a JVM hosted language to write your servlets if you want.
GWT has an incredible advantage over other JavaScript frameworks in that the layer of abstraction it provides allows for major future advances without any changes to your code. If the GWT compiler and browser detection scripts can take advantage of new browser features then you benefit from a simple recompile.
The big annoyance I see in your requirements in XML... hopefully that's just for integration with a 3rd party service and your client-server communication can just be GWT-RPC.
I don't use javascript or ajax, in medium-large application they create a lot of problem with compatibility, because moving some part of code inside client, create security breaches and problem with different browser.
I use only HTML(5) and CSS2/CSS3, and I have a lot successes.
I use this 2 ways:
using "puzzle-techinque". Write a lot of small and simple template (or tiles) to create the big page. I use only JSTL and Spring tag, with Rich/Prime/Ice-faces I encountered a lot of problem with rendering, page building and flow controller, so I discarded them.
using my custom library to parse HTML pages. I create template with my custom grammar, put inside the parser and write on output stream. This is the best way.
If you say me your preferred language and context, I can help you to perform JS-free.
I'm currently working on a web app that makes heavy use of JSF and IceFaces. We've had some discussions of moving to another presentation layer, and I thought I'd take the discussion out into SO and see what the experts think.
I'm curious if anyone could weigh in on the pros and cons of the various Java presentation layer technologies. If you've only worked with one, say why you love it or hate it. If you've worked with several, give your impressions of how they stack up against each other.
Our technologies under consideration are:
IceFaces
JSF (without IceFaces)
GWT (Google Web Toolkit)
Wicket
Tapestry
And if I'm missing anything from my list, let me know.
Thanks!
My opinions are quite heavily biased towards Wicket because I've been using it for a while after tripping over JSP mines far too many times.
Wicket PROs:
True separation of layout and code.
Component based which means high reusability of site elements; For example you can create prettified form with automatic labeling and CSS styles and everything and just by changing it's DAO object in the component's constructor it's completely reusable in another project.
Excellent support for things like Ajax, Portlets and various frameworks in general directly out-of-the-box AND more importantly it doesn't rely on anything else than slf4j/log4j to work, everything's optional!
Wicket CONs:
Development has some confusion about things in general and Wicket generics are a bit of a mess right now although they've been cleaned a lot in 1.4
Some components (like Form.onSubmit()) require extensive subclassing or anonymous method overriding for injecting behaviour easily. This is partly due to Wicket's powerful event-based design but unfortunately it also means it's easy to make a code mess with Wicket.
Random CONs: (that is, I haven't used but these are my opionions and/or things I've heard)
GWT is JavaScript based which sounds stupid to me. Main issue is that it reminds me too much of JSP:s and its autogenerated classes which are horrible.
Tapestry doesn't separate markup and code properly in a manner which could be easily validated between the two which will cause problems in the future.
I've used GWT for a couple small projects. Here are some things I like about it:
It's ajax by default, so I didn't have to make it do ajax, it just came along with using GWT.
It's got good separation of client versus server-side code.
I can unit-test my client code using junit
It lets you built crisp, snappy apps, largely because it's ajax.
Things I don't like:
Some things don't work as expected. For example, I've seen cases where click events didn't fire as expected, so I had to do a workaround.
Auto-deploy to tomcat running in eclipse sometimes just stops working, and I could never figure out why.
The biggest question I'd ask is why are you changing presentation layer? That's a very expensive cost and I can see the benefits of one technology outweighing the others by as much as the cost to change...
In short:
= JSF =
PROS:
component architecture;
many libraries & tools;
somewhat good IDE support
CONS:
heavy weight, both in CPU/memory and learning curve;
when something doesn't work as expected, it's difficult to debug
= WICKET =
PROS:
lightweight;
sensible templating system;
good tutorials;
CONS:
reference documentation is not so well organized and deep as are the tutorials;
development team had some serious difficulties, especially when becoming and incubated project. This lead to confusion on important aspects of the framework, at that time I had to switch to another framework because of this...
What about Stripes?
My pick would be Wicket. Have used it and is gives excellent re-usability. It has one of the most vibrant forum/mailing list. As a question and its gonna be answered in minutes. It has excellent support for AJAX. One of the usual cons attributed to Wicket is the steep learning curve. Well those were one of the old age cons which hold no value anymore now.
JSF: Better stay away from it. Another team which developed a project on JSF is now thinking to shift to Wicket after our success with it.
#Megadix: Like you said the documentation was poor in the beginning, but not any more. There is an excellent book called Wicket in Action written by the developers of Wicket. The sample code provided on the site is also a good place to start and learn
I'd wonder if you a have a service layer that's distinct from the web client, something that the web controllers simply invoke to get their work done.
If you do, the choice of web UI technology can be decoupled from the back end. If it's exposed as a contract first web service, you can have different apps share it. As long as your clients can send and receive XML they can interact with your services. Want to switch to Flex? No worries - point it at the service and render the XML response.
See my comparison of Wicket and Tapestry 5: Difference between Apache Tapestry and Apache Wicket.
As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.
Closed 10 years ago.
Question for all the GWT gurus out there - which is the best GWT widgets library out there? And why?
List based on the answers:
Default
Sencha GXT
Smart GWT
Vaadin
GWT-Bootstrap
GwtBootstrap3
Rocket GWT (inactive)
Tatami (inactive)
ErraiFramework
GWTMaterialDesign
И наконец- новое поколение основанное на JsInterop:
GWT + Polymer Elements
GWT + Polymer
Angular and GWT
GWTMaterialDesign
Do not bind yourself to ANY of these libraries. Use Vanilla GWT to create the structure of your project. In particular, use the MVP pattern and an Event Bus. Please, see google article to know how to best design your client application with GWT: Building MVP apps
After, you can use any widget of these libraries (say a table, or a combobox, a datepicker, etc) and incorporate it to your project. Try to use extended components ONLY if you don't see a way to do it with vanilla GWT. This way you don't tie yourself to these libraries which are ALWAYS a pain when you try to do something that doesn't appear in the demo application, contain many bugs and their support are poor at best.
How to look for widgets should follow this order:
First check GWT Incubator to see if
there's what I'm looking for.
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit-incubator/
Then, if you are looking for
something "cooler" check GWT Mosaic
http://code.google.com/p/gwt-mosaic/
Careful with other libraries, I've worked with them (and still have nightmares).
Depends on what you mean by "best". Best looking? Best API? Best for extending to your own custom needs?
E.g., I was just evaluating table classes to use in our application. We've been using GWT-Ext, but it has many performance problems for us, and is very hard to get the tables sized the way we need them. I came very close to going with GWT-Mosaic, but decided instead to build off the widgets in the GWT Incubator.
So, why did I make this choice? It seems that too many of the libraries out there come with their own, for lack of a better word, baggage. Either you have to dive whole-hog into some MVC framework (which may not be entirely compatible with the rest of your code base), or you have to adopt someone's new fangled layout system, or you have to live with the fact that you cannot really debug the code (because its just JSNI wrappers).
Don't get me wrong, the GWT Incubator isn't perfect...the widgets there are in some amount of flux. In my case, this was the best choice, though. It gives me good (but definitely not perfect):
API
Extensibility
Look and feel (well, this is kinda weak, but that's what CSS is for.)
So...the answer (for me) is a combination of:
Stock GWT widgets (with lots of custom styling)
GWT Incubator tables
A few home-grown widgets
(I should add: the "baggage" I'm referring to isn't necessarily a bad thing. But, if you just want a widget or two, it can raise the bar on what it takes to just get your work done and how good youe application looks.)
See this component library GWT Bootstrap this is a implementation in gwt of Twitter Bootstrap.
GWT alone is a pretty good library.
I didn't use all of the mentioned ones but can recommend Ext GWT.
I prefer vanilla GWT.
Some of the other APIs look pretty and their showcases really show off the widgets, but I always find that the performance isn't the best....when I say performance I mean more like response time. I hate when an application feels sluggish.
Most of the libraries mentioned are not open source and even worse: are just wrappers on top of a JavaScript library. The power of GWT lies in the fact that the application works on different browsers (because of the code generation for the "big" browsers specifically). These JavaScript underlying libraries can cause lots of problems.
I agree with jgindin GWT Incubator and GWT Mosaic are the best so far.
Not saying it's "the best", but I've been using GWT-Ext at work lately. It's got some pros and cons:
Pros:
Relatively easy to setup and use
Decent sized community behind it
LOTS of examples online, all of which have accompanying code
Good selection of widgets that cover a wide range of functionality
Cons:
Makes assumptions about your data's format and structure that you may not be able to accommodate
Library is just a JSNI wrapper, which makes it harder to debug and extend
Future support and development on the library is uncertain
Some annoying cross-browser issues still exist (especially with layouts)
Search function on their forums is essentially useless. (This is becoming a big pet peeve of mine >_<)
Do NOT use any of them! If you plan to develop a large scale application, you should consider using MVP pattern. The best implementation around is MVP4G framework, it supports GWT code splitting out of box. There are a lot of great examples, you can start with. The most valuable one is Mvp4GModules.
Add the new one: GWT-Bootstrap :)
There isnt a stable release right now, but will have soon.
My experience shows that there are always many problems with 3rd party libraries. The best way - is to use well-known and well-maked technology itself plus your own components. It may take a longer time to write and maintain them, but TCO is always at lower level.
3rd party libraries often can break your plans unexpectedly. And it's hard to find and fix the source of problem.
So I'd suggest to use plain GWT.
I think SmartGWT is fine if you just whant to use the Widgets as they are,
but if you would like to extend or modify the widgets as I do in
the Gxt Scheduler I think that Ext-GWT is a better choice.
for me EXT-GWT (aka GXT) is the best library currently available,I use it in 6 months project,and it helps a lot with many predefined components like grids,trees....
It's beautiful as well
SmartGWT is a good library and it has a lot of examples but the user interface is not that sleek. For user interface Ext GWT is good.
gwt-mosaic's user group doesn't seem very active and I couldn't find a user's manual besides the wiki snippets. gwt-mosaic introduced me to two interesting tools.
1) gwt-mosaic includes a wrapper for Tibco's PageBus which is a publish/subscribe tool for the JS parts of your app (RPC handlers, widget callbacks, widget setters). This is an alternative to gwt's event bus.
2) gwt-mosaic encourages the use of Beans Binding (http://code.google.com/p/gwt-beans-binding/) for binding data to widgets and validating widgets.
smartgwt isn't cheap for the full feature set and support. The jar is too large for appengine unless you remove the theme files you don't use. They invest engineering on the server side too.
I've heard ext-gwt is sluggish and the JS files are large.
The gwt widget incubator looks deprecated. I believe the deluxe grid will be released with the new gwt.
The lack of look-and-feel, binding, and validation standards is hampering the interoperability of widget libraries.
Definitely not SmartGWT. Their framework is bloated and has a very half-baked nature. They have a million widgets, but trying to get them to work for your project is not easy. Datasources complicate the process of managing your data in a very big way, for example, in order to get to data in your datasource, you must use fecth and inspect often. While you can cache the results, it is not always easy to interrogate them.
RPC is another weak and convoluted area. There is contradicting information in the documentation and in the forums. While the documentation will say that you should rarely use a custom operation as part of a ds, they forum will tell you that it's perfectly fine. Learning to use these tools effectively is an uphill climb on the best of days.
They will oversell the product. For example, the charting/analytics package contains graphs... But those graphs won't display negative values or let you manipulate axis labels in any meaningful way. And they openly respond to queries about this on the forum with a "yeah so what" attitude. "We don't plan on adding that to 3.0x even though that's one of our selling points, it's on our road map." When they sold me the package, they never mentioned that I couldn't display negative values. Really? What graph would not need to be able to show negative values? I can think of only one- the one depicting the number of unhappy Isomorphic customers.
Stay away from these guys, and head over to any competitor's site, for example ExtJS, JQuery, heck even quxdoo. There are a few projects out there that are really gaining ground and actually offer a good solution.
Take great caution if you ever evaluate this product. It looks nice, but about two weeks in to the project using it, you'll start seeing what I mean. Widgets are half baked, datasources are extremely over complicated, and just because you paid for forum support, doesn't mean you'll actually get anything other than snide, condescending answers that at first will make you think you missed something. You didn't they're generally very arrogant.
Best of luck, and stay away from this product if you value your development time and maintainability. Oh and one last thing. Look at the MVC example on their web site. It has literally nothing to do with MVC other than the label reads "MVC". They'll try to convince you that such frameworks are for inexperienced developers, and that such a concept has no place in real programming... Kinda like those try catch blocks.
Google's default library is the most powerful library.
Ext GWT adds bells and whistles but apart from that it's similar to Google's.
We're currently liking the GWT Mosaic widgets. We've worked with ext-JS and we've rolled our own widgets in the past. ext-JS licensing and bulk were a problem for us. Rolling our own isn't what we want to do. Mosaic gives us a happy middle ground which we like to think will be an even happier middle ground as the project matures.
I would say if you need only a few widgets then build your own. You might copy-paste some concepts from the libraries mentioned. But they all lack one or the other thing.
I have played with most of them and abandoned every one.
One thing to be aware of is that from the forums GWT-Ext looks like it will no longer be developed/maintained much (maybe not at all?). On their website they recommend migrating to SmartGWT.
Didn't see this one mentioned, Vaadin (previously known is IT Mill Toolkit), but maybe that's because it's not technically exactly GWT; as their FAQ says:
How does this differ from GWT?
GWT applications run in the browser,
while Vaadin applications run on the
server. We do actually use GWT as a
"rendering engine" on the browser
side, so you can combine Vaadin and
GWT.
smartGWT is slow and examples are lacking and it is very hard to find answers for even the basic questions, i.e. see all my non answered questions on this forum.
I'm dumping smartgwt.
Comparison of the two EXTs here with pros and cons.
We have built a large HR portal and a couple of smaller applications using GWT Portlets. The focus of the project is not so much on building a collection of widgets but on creating a simple programming model.
From the website:
GWT Portlets is a free open source web framework for building GWT (Google Web Toolkit) applications. It defines a very simple & productive, yet powerful programming model to build good looking, modular GWT applications.
The programming model is somewhat similar to writing JSR168 portlets for a portal server (Liferay, JBoss Portal etc.). The "portal" is your application built using the GWT Portlets framework as a library. Application functionality is developed as loosely coupled Portlets each with an optional server side DataProvider.
I am using GWT for a year. After lots of research, I have decided GWT Mosaic as a widget library.. Mosaic uses some of the GWT incubator components such as PagingScrollTable.. But the features of the combobox and table are not sufficient for us.. That is why, we have extended these components to add needed functionality.
Check out SpiffyUI: www.spiffyui.org
It is not just a widget library but complex UI/UX GWT framework.
Two important things -and what the most of libraries miss- are unit testing and debugging. It is where GWT shines. If you use a library which is based on vanilla js, you give away the ability to unit test and debug your project. As a GWT developer you should consider these points and use a library with no or minimal js dependency.
We've been doing gwt projects for more than 2 years, and we stick to the default widgets. We made our own open source library to autopopulate the default ones or our own widget extensions. Please check it, it's called gwt-jet. It's very well tested since we use it in large production environments, and we hope it will grow safely thru time.