I'm currently working on my 2D game project (Java), but so far any kind of game logic or AI has been crudely implemented. For instance, say I need to randomly position a bunch of sprites a long the top of the screen, I'd be using the Random class to do this. I'd simply use Random.nextInt( size of x axis on which to spawn ); Although this does work I'd be interested to hear how I should really be going about this kind of thing.
As a second scenario (this is why I put AI in the title, although it's not really AI), say I want to have my characters randomly blink in a life-like fashion. What I'd do here is use the Random class to calculate a % (say 20% chance) of blinking and call it every second.
Any suggestions on how I should really be going about this would be greatly appreciated.
Google for a paper titled "Steering Behaviors" by Craig Reynolds. It address just this and you'll find great ideas to start with specifically some nice ideas for giving groups of sprites the appearance of 'intelligent' movement. The key for him in his different behaviors, i.e. flocking, etc. is making properties of any given sprite dependent on those of some other sprite. You could even go so far as to say, like -- any given sprite will blink only if it's two neighbors just have blinked. Something or other along those lines.
Hope this helps!
Are you using an OOP (Object-Oriented approach)? If not, you should definitely look into it. It's really simple with java and can speed up your development time and neaten your code.
I would make a sprite class, and give them a function, say actionSpawn, or actionMove (I like to start my "action" functions with the word action so they are easily identifiable). In this function you would encapsulate the Random.nextInt function, to set the sprite's x and/or y position.
You could use the same approach to make them blink.
Related
I am developing an AI simulation of predator and prey. I would like to simulate the AI hiding behind obstacles, if it is being chased. But I am still trying to figure out the best way to implement this.
I was thinking along the lines of checking on which side of the obstacle the predator is on and trying to go on the opposite side. Maybe using the A* path finding algorithm to ensure that it gets there using the shortest path.
Now the main reason I am writing is in case somebody is able to point me in the right direction of implementing this (maybe somebody has done this before) or have any other good ideas how to implement it. I have never done anything like this before in terms of programming AI or making any game.
All the obstacles are either horizontal or vertical squares/rectangles.
Please note that the circle in red is the predator while the circle in green is the prey being chased.
I can't give any code off the top of my head, but I can tell you a few things:
First, you need to define the goal of this program. For this case, it is to get the AI to hide behind an obstacle, keeping the user and the AI on opposite sides whenever possible.
Next, you need to decide what needs to be done inside the code (without writing any real code) to accomplish this goal. For instance:
We need to determine what "zone" of the scene is considered "behind the obstacle"
Next, we need to determine a path for the AI to get to that zone without going through the obstacle.
Lastly, we need to add some sort of delay to this so the AI doesn't constantly change its mind for every pixel the user moves across the screen
This isn't per se an easy problem, but it is certainly achievable without breaking too much of a sweat. I'd recommend you find a way, even if it is slow and requires a ton of code, then write the code for it, and lastly refine. If you worry about refinement, then you never get any of the problem solved.
HINT: Determine a vector that points from the player to the middle of the obstacle. Then, multiply the vector by 2 and add it to the position of the player and that gives you a point on the other side of the obstacle (assuming it is a rectangle). Apply a Math.min() or Math.max() restrictor to the x and y values you get to keep the AI as close or far from the obstacle as you wish. That should be a decent start! :)
Update -- I decided to add some code!
// This assumes a few variables:
int obstacleCenterX, obstacleCenterY;
int aiX, aiY, aiWalkSpeed;
int predatorX, predatorY;
private void updateAIMovement() {
int slope_x = obstacleCenterX - predatorX;
int slope_y = obstacleCenterY - predatorY;
int destination_x = predatorX + (slope_x * 2);
int destination_y = predatorY + (slope_y * 2);
if(aiX != destination_x){
aiX += (slope_x / Math.abs(slope_x)) * aiWalkSpeed;
}
if(aiY != destination_y){
aiY += (slope_y / Math.abs(slope_y)) * aiWalkSpeed;
}
}
I have not tested anything at all, but I think this might be somewhat of a right path to take. I could have done A LOT to improve just that little code snippet, but I didn't (such as some trig to make sure the player moves at a true speed when going diagonally, etc...)
Hopefully this helps a little!
I would check if there is something crossing the direct line between x and each observer. If it is, x is hidden.
I have just started learning basics about Graphics2D class, So far I am able to draw different objects and implements ActionListener to actually move them on screen by onKeyPress. So far so good, While I thought of doing something more complicated. I want to give a path to my object and animate it on that particular path only.
Something like, I will draw a line on sky and a plane should stick with that drawn line and keep it self to fly on that particular line. Now is it possible?
I don't need any sort of code, But few different method or ideas will let me get started working on this. A visualise elaboration of my idea is as below.
Start Point :
End Point :
Now as shown above, my yellow box(in future plane) should stick with given path while animating(path grey line)
My research so far,
I have searched my buzz words such as path in java, and found Path2D and GeneralPath classes, Does anyone know if I can use that to solve this.
Thanks
Great !
It reminds me of my first steps in IT. How much I enjoyed all this simple math stuff but that make things move on screen. :)
What you need is actually a linear interpolation . There are other sorts of interpolation and some api offer a nice encapsulation for the concept but here is the main idea, and you will quite often need this stuff :
you must rewrite your path
y = f (x )
as a function of time :
at time 0 the item will be on start position, at time 1 it will reach the end. And then you increment time (t) as you wish (0.001 every ms for instance).
So here is the formula for a simple linear path :
x = xstart + (xend-xstart) * t
y = ystart + (yend-ystart) * t
when t varies, you object will just move linearly along the path, linearly has speed will be constant on all the path. You could imagine some kind of gravtity attraction at end for instance, this would be modeled by a quadratic acceleration (t^2 instead of t) ...
Regards,
Stephane
First, make the ability to move from point a to point b. This is done with simple algebra.
Second, make the ability to take a path and translate it into points. Then when you're going to do curves, you're really just moving from point to point to point along that curve.
This is the most elementary way to do it and works for most instances.
What your talking about is simple 2D graphics and sprites. If that is all you need then for Java take a look at Java 2D Sprites If your leaning more towards or will eventually go with camera perspectives and wanting to view the animation from diferent angles the go with Java 3D from the OpenSource Java 3D.org. Either way what you want is a simple translating of the object along a line, pretty simple in either 2D or 3D.
You can try going trough the code of my open source college project - LANSim. It's code is available in Code menu. It does similar to what you are trying to do.
Im making small 2D game and i would like how should, theoretically work jumping and standing on objects.
For jumping should there be some kind of gravity?Should i use collision detection?
Good example of what i want to undestand is jumping in Mario.
I think for jumping it would be best to create some simple model which use "game time". I would personally create some physical model based on gravity, but you can go for whatever you want.
If you want your character to "stand" on object, you will have to create some collision detection. Good start is to approximate object by one or more circles (or lines) compute collision of them and in case the approximation collides determine the final state by some more precise method.
In terms of should there be gravity and collision detection - personally for such a thing I'd say yes and yes! It doesn't have to be complicated but once you have those things in place the pseudocode for the "main loop" becomes relatively simple:
if not colliding with object underneath, apply gravity
if user presses jump key and not colliding with surface //i.e. if we're in the air already, don't jump again
apply upward velocity
That is of course oversimplified and there are other corner cases to deal with (like making sure when you're coming down after jumping, you don't end up embedded or potentially going through the floor.
You might want to take a look at Greenfoot which handles a lot of things like all the Java2d stuff, collision detection etc. for you. Even if you don't stick with it it'd be a good platform for building a prototype or playing around with the ideas talked about.
Standing on objects implies collision detection, you can approximate the characters and the environment objects with primitive shapes (rectangles, circles etc.).
To check if to shapes are colliding, check axis one by one (X and Y axis in your case). Here is an explanation of the "separating axis theorem" (Section 1).
Yesterday I came across Craig Reynolds' Boids, and subsequently figured that I'd give implementing a simple 2D version in Java a go.
I've put together a fairly basic setup based closely on Conrad Parker's notes.
However, I'm getting some rather bizarre (in my opinion) behaviour. Currently, my boids move reasonably quickly into a rough grid or lattice, and proceed to twitch on the spot. By that I mean they move around a little and rotate very frequently.
Currently, I have implemented:
Alignment
Cohesion
Separation
Velocity limiting
Initially, my boids are randomly distributed across the screen area (slightly different to Parker's method), and their velocities are all directed towards the centre of the screen area (note that randomly initialised velocities give the same result). Changing the velocity limit value only changes how quickly the boids move into this pattern, not formation of the pattern.
As I see it, this could be:
A consequence of the parameters I'm using (right now my code is as described in Parker's pseudocode; I have not yet tried areas of influence defined by an angle and a radius as described by Reynolds.)
Something I need to implement but am not aware of.
Something I am doing wrong.
The expected behaviour would be something more along the lines of a two dimensional version of what happens in the applet on Reynolds' boids page, although right now I haven't implemented any way to keep the boids on screen.
Has anyone encountered this before? Any ideas about the cause and/or how to fix it? I can post a .gif of the behaviour in question if it helps.
Perhaps your weighting for the separation rule is too strong, causing all the boids to move as far away from all neighboring boids as they can. There are various constants in my pseudocode which act as weights: /100 in rule 1 and /8 in rule 3 (and an implicit *1 in rule 2); these can be tweaked, which is often useful for modelling different behaviors such as closely-swarming insects or gliding birds.
Also the arbitrary |distance| < 100 in the separation rule should be modified to match the units of your simulation; this rule should only apply to boids within close proximity, basically to avoid collisions.
Have fun!
If they see everyone, they will all try to move with average velocity. If they see only some there can be some separated groups.
And if they are randomly distributed, it will be close to zero.
If you limit them by rectangle and either repulse them from walls or teleport them to other side when they got close) and have too high separation, they will be pushed from walls (from walls itself or from other who just were teleported, who will then be pushed to other side (and push and be pushed again)).
So try tighter cohesion, limited sight, more space and distribute them clustered (pick random point and place multiple of them small random distance from there), not uniformly or normaly.
I encountered this problem as well. I solved it by making sure that the method for updating each boid's velocity added the new velocity onto the old, instead of resetting it. Essentially, what's happening is this: The boids are trying to move away from each other but can't accelerate (because their velocities are being reset instead of increasing, as they should), thus the "twitching". Your method for updating velocities should look like
def set_velocity(self, dxdy):
self.velocity = (self.velocity[0] + dxdy[0], self.velocity[1] + dxdy[1])
where velocity and dxdy are 2-tuples.
I wonder if you have a problem with collision rectangles. If you implemented something based on overlapping rectangles (like, say, this), you can end up with the behaviour you describe when two rectangles are close enough that any movement causes them to intersect. (Or even worse if one rectangle can end up totally inside another.)
One solution to this problem is to make sure each boid only looks in a forwards direction. Then you avoid the situation where A cannot move because B is too close in front, but B cannot move because A is too close behind.
A quick check is to actually paint all of your collision rectangles and colour any intersecting ones a different colour. It often gives a clue as to the cause of the stopping and twitching.
I need to make a text-based RPG game with java. The first part of the assignment is super simple. we just use vertical lines and underscores to make a little rectangle and then add symbols inside the rectangle as things move, act, die, etc.
I've never done this before, so I want to run my idea by you:
What do you think about doing something like angry birds but with flying moving targets? There would be a little "bird tank" at the bottom left of the screen that would shoot birds. Another question: I'm not entirely sure how I would create a gun that shoots at different angles in a text-based format. And how would it work with aiming and shooting and timing, and such?
Update:
I think I'm going to try out a tank game. But I'm confused about how to implemenent the angle of the turret.
I would put the tank in the bottom left corner, put I only have text symbols at my disposal. I don't see how its possible to let the user control the turret, and make it move up and down by small amounts (at least, not until we start using images/gui's.)
Any ideas?
First, in order to make your idea meet the criteria of an RPG, you would have to add a few components. Your gun would need to gain experience as you hit your targets, and would have to level up after enough time. It could gain better speed or accuracy. It could also earn upgrade points that you could spend on different birds to shoot. It would probably also be cool if your targets had hit points and you had to hit some of them multiple times to kill them. You could show the damage by changing the color of the text. These elements will give it more of an RPG feel so that you can meet the criteria of the assignment.
As for the mechanics of the game, you're going to have to write some sort of physics engine. It doesn't have to be very complicated, just enough to be able to calculate or modify a trajectory and determine if there was a collision. This engine would have some sort of a tick() method on it where it would advance the positions of the birds and targets and then you could call a getCollisions() method and handle each one. That's the simple way. The more complex way would involve giving the engine its own thread where it runs constantly, as fast as it can. Then, when there is a collision, it fires off an event to a listener, and you set up some sort of handler to apply the damage to the target, award points, etc.
I would recommend you model the world in finer resolution than your text console. Make the text console simply mark the birds and targets by rounding them to the nearest 80x25 console location, but internally use a much higher resolution. This will keep it looking more realistic, even in an environment with such a poor resolution.
For the controls of the game, I would recommend putting a target reticule on the screen. The user can move it around with their arrow keys to aim and press the space bar to shoot. They wouldn't hit the target because gravity should pull the bird downward, or perhaps because the bird is a special shot that splits into pieces. Regardless, they would learn how to lead their targets appropriately, and that would be the skill of the game.
It's a complicated project. Good luck!