What is the equiv way in Jackson json annotation for the following jax-b annotations?
I need to produce json rather than xml and need to know the conventional jackson annotations that is equivalently denoted in jax-b.
rename a field.
use getters instead of fields.
These features are especially crucial if the json/xml element name is a java reserved word
like "new", "public", "static", etc.
So that we have to name the POJO fields as "_new_", "_public_", "_static_", etc, respectively,
but use jax-b annotation to rename them back to "new", "public", "static", etc
in the generated XML (and json) elements.
Renaming a field
#XmlAccessorType(XmlAccessType.FIELD)
public class Person{
#XmlElement(required = true)
protected String name;
#XmlElement(required = true)
protected String address;
#XmlElement(name = "contractor")
protected boolean _restricted_ ;
#XmlElement(name = "new")
protected boolean _new_ ;
}
Redirect to using property getter (I think this is how it is done in jax-b)
#XmlAccessorType(XmlAccessType.PROPERTY)
public class Person{
protected String name;
protected String address;
protected boolean _restricted_ ;
protected boolean _new_ ;
#XmlElement(required = true)
protected String getName() {return name;}
#XmlElement(required = true)
protected String getAddress() {return address;}
#XmlElement(name = "contractor")
protected boolean getRestricted() {return _restricted_;}
#XmlElement(name = "new")
protected boolean getNew(){return _new_;}
}
Probably it's a bit late but anyway..
you can rename a property just adding
#JsonProperty("contractor")
And by default Jackson use the getter and setter to serialize and deserialize.
For more detailed information: http://wiki.fasterxml.com/JacksonFAQ
With some example, You can also use it in getter and setter to rename it to different field
public class Sample {
private String fruit;
#JsonProperty("get_apple")
public void setFruit(String fruit) {
this.fruit = fruit;
}
#JsonProperty("send_apple")
public String getFruit() {
return fruit;
}
}
Please note that the proper JavaEE API for this is to use the javax.json.bind.annotation.JsonbProperty annotation. Of course Jackson and others are just some implementations of the JSON Binding API, they will likely comply with this.
If you are not using Jackson still want to rename a property you can use #SerializedName("your_original_key_name")
My JSON Data:
{
"default": "0"
}
As you know we never use predefined keywords as a variable name so solution is:
#SerializedName("default")
private String default_value;
public String getDefault_value() {
return default_value;
}
public void setDefault_value(String default_value) {
this.default_value = default_value;
}
That's all you have to do now value comes from the key "default" and you can use it with getter and setter using "default_value"
In this case (Predifind Keywords as Json Key Name) or in any other case where you want to change your variable name to get data from the original key name this is the easiest approach.
I'm just reiterating #Himanshu's Answer,
Java Bean Property Field
#SerializedName("TCS Rate")
private String TCSRate;
Here we need this import
import com.google.gson.annotations.SerializedName;
Maven Dependency
<dependency>
<groupId>com.google.code.gson</groupId>
<artifactId>gson</artifactId>
<version>2.9.0</version>
</dependency>
Related
I am quite new to Java and I am trying to deserialize the JSON using Jackson and I facing some minor issue with regards to declaring the Object/Variable type. I will provide all the codes then explain the issue for easy understanding.
I have an enum that will have the required type values:
public enum IdentifierTypeValues {
Type1,
Type2,
Type3,
//Constructor and Getter of enum values
}
Then for each of these type, I have different classes which will have different input and do a completely different type of process:
public class GenerateType1 {
private String name;
private String age;
//Getter and Setter
//Some required process based on these values
}
public class GenerateType2 {
private String address;
private String city;
private String country;
//Getter and Setter
//Some required process based on these values
}
public class GenerateType3 {
private String firstName;
private String lastName;
private String fullName;
//Getter and Setter
//Some required process based on these values
}
Now I have a wrapper class for these type of classes which will take the type based on enum and typeInfo values. I want the typeInfo values to be any of the class based type something like this:
public class TypeSyntax {
private IdentifierTypeValues indeitiferType;
private GenerateType1 / GenerateType2 / GenerateType3 identifierTypeValues;
//Here the identifierTypeValues can have the values for anytype
//How to declare a variable of any of these class type?
}
This is the class that will be used by my JSON for deserializing. I know I can add a wrapper class of those 3 types and provide that wrapper class as a type class for this. Something like this:
public class WrapperClass{
private GenerateType1 type1;
private GenerateType2 type2;
private GenerateType3 type3;
}
public class TypeSyntax{
private IdentifierTypeValues indeitiferType;
private WrapperClass identifierTypeValues;
//But using this approach will change my JSON structure which I do not want to do.
}
My JSON structure is something like this and I would like to keep it in the same way.
{
"indeitiferType":"Type1",
"identifierTypeValues":{
"name":"Batman",
"age":"2008"
}
}
Is there a way I can declare the variable of multiple type class? or any better approach to handle this by keeping the json format same? I tried searching but I am unable to search what exactly so any help would be really appriciated.
Because the type identifier exists on a different level than the other properties a wrapper class TypeSyntax needed. There are several open feature requests to add wrapping functionality to Jackson e.g. https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/issues/512
Fortunately polymorphism is supported in Jackson with #JsonTypeInfo and #JsonSubTypes annotations.
Wrapper class should look like:
public class TypeSyntax {
#JsonTypeInfo(use = JsonTypeInfo.Id.NAME,
include = JsonTypeInfo.As.EXTERNAL_PROPERTY,
property = "identifierType")
private GenerateTypeBase identifierTypeValues;
// getters and setters (omitted for brevity)
}
GenerateTypeBase is the common parent class
#JsonSubTypes({
#JsonSubTypes.Type(value = GenerateType1.class, name = "Type1"),
#JsonSubTypes.Type(value = GenerateType2.class, name = "Type2"),
})
public abstract class GenerateTypeBase {
private String name;
private String age;
// getters and setters (omitted for brevity)
}
In this different children classes will instantiated based on the identifierType property.
The children must extend this base class:
public class GenerateType2 extends GenerateTypeBase {
// additional properties
}
In a short test it will be:
#Test
void wrapperTest() throws IOException {
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
GenerateType2 a = new GenerateType2();
a.setName("Foo");
a.setAge("13");
TypeSyntax w = new TypeSyntax();
w.setIdentifierTypeValues(a);
String json = mapper.writeValueAsString(w);
System.out.println(json);
}
and the output:
{
"identifierTypeValues":
{
"name":"Foo",
"age":"13"
},
"identifierType":"Type2"
}
Deserialization
#Test
void wrapperTest() throws IOException {
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
String input = "{\"identifierTypeValues\": \"name\":\"Foo\",\"age\":\"13\"},\"identifierType\":\"Type2\"}";
TypeSyntax w = mapper.readValue(new StringReader(input), TypeSyntax.class);
assertAll(
() -> assertEquals(GenerateType2.class, o.getIdentifierTypeValues().getClass()),
() -> assertEquals("13", o.getIdentifierTypeValues().getAge())
);
}
If you want more flexibility you can write custom (de)serializer and / or custom resolver. Using custom TypeIdResolver that will possible to convert identifiers to types programmatically instead of using "key-value pairs" in #JsonSubTypes
I have to create POJOs so that I can generate XML using JAXB for the below XML (Just a sample because child elements may go beyond 40).
Here, important thing to note is that I cannot declare these elements as properties in POJO because I won't be knowing the elements name.
<User>
<FirstName>Mahendra</FirstName>
<MiddleName>Singh</MiddleName>
<LastName>Dhoni</LastName>
<Organization>
<Name>Electronics</Name>
<id>elc001</id>
</Organization>
<Manager>
<Name>Sourabh</Name>
<id>emp_001</id>
</Manager>
</User>
I have created POJO for above XML as:
Fields1.java : For elements having value only.
public class Fields1
{
#XmlTransient
public String fieldName1;
#XmlValue
public String value;
// getter,setter
}
Fields2.java : For elements having child elements.
public class Fields2
{
#XmlTransient
public String fieldName2;
#XmlElement(name="NAME")
public String name;
#XmlElement(name="ID")
public String id;
// getter,setter
}
User.java : Root element class
public class User
{
#XmlVariableNode("fieldName1")
public List<Fields1> fields1;
#XmlVariableNode("fieldName2")
public List<Fields2> fields2;
// getter, setter
}
Here, #XmlVariableNode is helping me to generate elements name dynamically.
1. But, it only works fine if there is only single property
2. and if, there are two properties then it just works for the first one and ignores the next.
AFAIK, multiple #XmlVariableNodes in the same class are not possible. EclipseLink's documentation states:
Since this [#XmlVariableNode] makes use of the any logic during unmarshal and MOXy only
handles one Any mapping on a class if a class makes use of the
XmlVariableNode annotation then that class can not have XmlAnyElement
annotations or any other variables that would cause AnyObject or
AnyCollection mappings to be created.
(Source: EclipseLink/DesignDocs/406697)
You might be able to solve your problem by using nested #XmlVariableNodes:
public class TopLevelField {
#XmlTransient
public String fieldName;
#XmlVariableNode("fieldName")
public List<NestedField> fields;
// ...
}
public class NestedField {
#XmlTransient
public String fieldName;
#XmlValue
public String value;
// ...
}
#XmlRootElement
public class User {
#XmlVariableNode("fieldName")
public List<TopLevelField> fields;
}
I have two different packages of User define Objects.....
1) ws.lender.dto (all Objects exists in this package are source side).
2) copl.com.dto (all Objects exists in this package are destination side).
Objects hierarchy and Objects name different in both side. I wan to
copy source side object to destination side object field by field or
via getter and setter using Reflection.
For Example
Source side Objects
package ws.lender.dto;
#XmlAccessorType(XmlAccessType.FIELD)
#XmlType(name = "CustomerAddresses", propOrder = {
"previousAddresses"
})
public class CustomerAddresses {
protected PreviousAddresses previousAddresses;
public PreviousAddresses getPreviousAddresses() {
return previousAddresses;
}
public void setPreviousAddresses(PreviousAddresses value) {
this.previousAddresses = value;
}
}
#XmlAccessorType(XmlAccessType.FIELD)
#XmlType(name = "PreviousAddresses", propOrder = {
"previousAddress"
})
public class PreviousAddresses {
#XmlElement(name = "PreviousAddress", required = true)
protected List<PreviousAddress> previousAddress;
public List<PreviousAddress> getPreviousAddress() {
if (previousAddress == null) {
previousAddress = new ArrayList<PreviousAddress>();
}
return this.previousAddress;
}
}
#XmlAccessorType(XmlAccessType.FIELD)
#XmlType(name = "PreviousAddress", propOrder = {
"streetNo",
"streetName"
})
public class PreviousAddress {
#XmlElement(name = "StreetNo", required = true)
protected String streetNo;
#XmlElement(name = "StreetName", required = true)
protected String streetName;
public String getStreetNo() {
return streetNo;
}
public void setStreetNo(String value) {
this.streetNo = value;
}
public String getStreetName() {
return streetName;
}
public void setStreetName(String value) {
this.streetName = value;
}
}
Destination side Objects
package copl.com.dto;
#javax.persistence.Entity
public class Customer implements java.io.Serializable
{
private Set<CustomerAddress> customerAddresses;
public Set<CustomerAddress> getCustomerAddresses()
{
return customerAddresses;
}
public void setCustomerAddresses(Set<CustomerAddress> customerAddresses)
{
this.customerAddresses = customerAddresses;
}
}
#javax.persistence.Entity
public class CustomerAddress implements java.io.Serializable
{
private String unitNumber;
private String streetName;
private String streetNumber;
public String getUnitNumber()
{
return unitNumber;
}
public void setUnitNumber(String unitNumber)
{
this.unitNumber = unitNumber;
}
public String getStreetName()
{
return streetName;
}
public String getStreetNumber()
{
return streetNumber;
}
public void setStreetName(String streetName)
{
this.streetName = streetName;
}
public void setStreetNumber(String streetNumber)
{
this.streetNumber = streetNumber;
}
}
I think you could use MapStruct to mapping between POJO's that has different attribute names.
But your scenario is complex, because you want to convert ws.lender.dto.CustomerAddresses to copl.com.dto.Customer, and this implies to convert a List<ws.lender.dto.PreviousAddress> contained into a ws.lender.dto.PreviousAddresses object, to a Set<copl.com.dto.CustomerAddress> contained into a copl.com.dto.Customer object.
So, I will explain step by step.
1. Convert from ws.lender.dto.PreviousAddress to copl.com.dto.CustomerAddress
To do this conversion you need an interface (MapStruct will create an instance for this) responsible for mapping from source object to destination object:
import ws.lender.dto.PreviousAddress;
import copl.com.dto.CustomerAddress;
#Mapper
public interface CustomerAddressesMapper{
CustomerAddressesMapper INSTANCE = Mappers.getMapper( CustomerAddressesMapper.class );
#Mappings(#Mapping(source = "streetNo", target = "streetNumber")
CustomerAddress previousToCustomerObject(PreviousAddress address);
}
This interface will map a PreviousAddress object to a CustomerAddress considering that streetNo attribute has to be mapped to streetNumber. There is no mapping for unitNumber attribute cause there is no source for it.
2. Convert a List<ws.lender.dto.PreviousAddress> to Set<copl.com.dto.CustomerAddress>
Now you have to add another mapping method to existing CustomerAddressesMapper interface:
Set<CustomerAddress> previousToCustomerSet(List<PreviousAddress> addresses);
This method will use the former previousToCustomerObject to convert every element of source list to destination set.
3. Convert from ws.lender.dto.CustomerAddresses to copl.com.dto.Customer
Finally, you need to add the last mapping method to CustomerAddressesMapper interface:
#Mappings(#Mapping(source = "previousAddresses.previousAddress", target = "customerAddresses")
Customer customerAddrsToCustomerObject(CustomerAddresses addresses);
This is the where you map an origin object, converting previousAddresses.previousAddress attribute to customerAddresses attribute, using former methods.
4. Using the mapper
To use the mapper you have to write some code as following:
CustomerAddressesMapper mapper = CustomerAddressesMapper.INSTANCE;
CustomerAddresses origin = //Retrieve it from anywhere
Customer dest = mapper.customerAddrsToCustomerObject(origin);
5. Setup
MapStruct is a source code generator, so you need to properly configure your pom.xml to include MapStruct dependency and to invoke this code generation. You can see how to do this here
Well I don't build and run this code, but this is the way to do it.
Hope it helps!
I have studied many objects mapping frameworks for this assignments like
Orika
MapStruct
ModelMapper
Dozer
Commons-BeanUtils
Finally I choose the Orika framework to complete that above Objects to Objects mapping. We can do the that mapping via other mapper framework, but I was like Orika framework because this framework very easy to use for mapping Objects to Objects.
I will explain step by step.
1. Create the Objects of Source side Object and Destination side Object.
like this..
Customer destination = new Customer();
CustomerAddresses source = new CustomerAddresses();
source = filledCustomerAddressesObject();
2. Constructing the DefaultMapperFactory
MapperFactory mapperFactory = new DefaultMapperFactory.Builder().build();
3. Mapping fields
ClassMapBuilder<CustomerAddresses, Customer> builder;
builder= mapperFactory.classMap(CustomerAddresses.class, Customer.class).constructorA();
builder.field("previousAddresses.previousAddress{streetNo}","customerAddresses{streetNumber}");
builder.field("previousAddresses.previousAddress{streetName}","customerAddresses{streetName}");
builder.register();
BoundMapperFacade<CustomerAddresses, Customer> boundMapper;
boundMapper = mapperFactory.getMapperFacade(CustomerAddresses.class, Customer.class);
destination = boundMapper.map(source, destination);
Its work fine Cheers
You can try Object Mapper better for casting or copying. The object to other classes in other packages you can add some property value like
senderClass and rvcClass
Later you can read those properties and proceed for converting the class. Probably you already have mapping ready for sender class against receiver class.
If I understand you correctly, you need a way to copy all like-named properties from one object to another. Like-named properties would be cases in which the source object has a method called something like getPropertyName() and the destination object has one called setPropertyName().
If this is right, then you want to use the copyProperties method of the BeanUtils class from the Apache Commons library. Documentation is here.
Now, in your example, you have some corresponding properties that are not like-named, such as StreetNumber and StreetNo. I'm afraid there's no easy way to handle that sort of thing automatically through reflection; you would need to define the mappings between source and target properties yourself, perhaps by defining a helper class to do the copying.
I have a User class that I want to map to JSON using Jackson.
public class User {
private String name;
private int age;
private int securityCode;
// getters and setters
}
I map this to a JSON string using -
User user = getUserFromDatabase();
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
String json = mapper.writeValueAsString(user);
I don't want to map the securityCode variable. Is there any way of configuring the mapper so that it ignores this field?
I know I can write custom data mappers or use the Streaming API but I would like to know if it possible to do it through configuration?
You have two options:
Jackson works on setters-getters of fields. So, you can just remove getter of field which you want to omit in JSON. ( If you don't need getter at other place.)
Or, you can use the #JsonIgnore annotation of Jackson on getter method of that field and you see there in no such key-value pair in resulted JSON.
#JsonIgnore
public int getSecurityCode(){
return securityCode;
}
Adding this here because somebody else may search this again in future, like me. This Answer is an extension to the Accepted Answer
You have two options:
1. Jackson works on setters-getters of fields. So, you can just remove getter of field which you want to omit in JSON. ( If you don't need getter at other place.)
2. Or, you can use the `#JsonIgnore` [annotation of Jackson][1] on getter method of that field and you see there in no such key-value pair in resulted JSON.
#JsonIgnore
public int getSecurityCode(){
return securityCode;
}
Actually, newer version of Jackson added READ_ONLY and WRITE_ONLY annotation arguments for JsonProperty. So you could also do something like this.
#JsonProperty(access = Access.WRITE_ONLY)
private String securityCode;
instead of
#JsonIgnore
public int getSecurityCode(){
return securityCode;
}
you also can gather all properties on an annotation class
#JsonIgnoreProperties( { "applications" })
public MyClass ...
String applications;
If you don't want to put annotations on your Pojos you can also use Genson.
Here is how you can exclude a field with it without any annotations (you can also use annotations if you want, but you have the choice).
Genson genson = new Genson.Builder().exclude("securityCode", User.class).create();
// and then
String json = genson.serialize(user);
Field Level:
public class User {
private String name;
private int age;
#JsonIgnore
private int securityCode;
// getters and setters
}
Class Level:
#JsonIgnoreProperties(value = { "securityCode" })
public class User {
private String name;
private int age;
private int securityCode;
}
if you are using GSON you have to mark the field/member declarations as #Expose and use the GsonBuilder().excludeFieldsWithoutExposeAnnotation().create()
Don't forget to mark your sub classes with #Expose otherwise the fields won't show.
I suggest you use this.
#JsonProperty(access = JsonProperty.Access.WRITE_ONLY)
private int securityCode;
This allows you to set the value of securityCode(especially if you use lombok #Setter) and also prevent the field from showing up in the GET request.
I had a similar case where I needed some property to be deserialized (JSON to Object) but not serialized (Object to JSON)
First i went for #JsonIgnore - it did prevent serialization of unwanted property, but failed to de-serialize it too. Trying value attribute didn't help either as it requires some condition.
Finally, working #JsonProperty with access attribute worked like a charm.
I have the following json file:
{
"segments": {
"externalId": 123,
"name": "Tomas Zulberti",
"shouldInform": true,
"id": 4
}
}
But the java model is as follows:
public class Segment {
private String id;
private String name;
private boolean shouldInform;
// getter and setters here...
}
When Jackson is parsing it raises an exception becuase there is no getter or setter for the field "externalId". It there a decorator that can be used to ignore a json field?
You can use annotation #JsonIgnoreProperties; if it's just one value you want to skip, something like:
#JsonIgnoreProperties({"externalId"})
or to ignore anything that can't be used:
#JsonIgnoreProperties(ignoreUnknown=true)
There are other ways to do it too, for rest check out FasterXML Jackson wiki.
Also we can use mapper.enable(DeserializationFeature.FAIL_ON_IGNORED_PROPERTIES);
instead #JsonIgnoreProperties(ignoreUnknown=true)
but for particular property we can use
#JsonIgnoreProperties({"externalId"})
public class Segment {
private String id;
private String name;
private boolean shouldInform;
// getter and setters here...
}