The following regex works in the find dialog of Eclipse but throws an exception in Java.
I can't find why
(?<=(00|\\+))?[\\d]{1}[\\d]*
The syntax error is at runtime when executing:
Pattern.compile("(?<=(00|\\+))?[\\d]{1}[\\d]*")
In the find I used
(?<=(00|\+))?[\d]{1}[\d]*
I want to match phone numbers with or without the + or 00. But that is not the point because I get a Syntax error at position 13. I don't get the error if I get rid of the second "?"
Pattern.compile("(?<=(00|\\+))[\\d]{1}[\\d]*")
Please consider that instead of 1 sometime I need to use a greater number and anyway the question is about the syntax error
If your data looks like 00ddddd or +ddddd where d is digit you want to get #Bergi's regex (?<=00|\\+)\\d+ will do the trick. But if your data sometimes don't have any part that you want to ignore like ddddd then you probably should use group mechanism like
String[] data={"+123456","00123456","123456"};
Pattern p=Pattern.compile("(?:00|\\+)?(\\d+)");
Matcher m=null;
for (String s:data){
m=p.matcher(s);
if(m.find())
System.out.println(m.group(1));
}
output
123456
123456
123456
Here is an example that works for me:
public static void main(String[] args) {
Pattern pattern = Pattern.compile("(?<=00|\\+)(\\d+)");
Matcher matcher = pattern.matcher("+1123456");
if (matcher.find()) {
System.out.println(matcher.group(1));
}
}
You might shorten your regex a lot. The character classes are not needed when there is only one class inside - just use \d. And {1} is quite useless as well. Also, you can use + for matching "one or more" (it's short for {1,}). Next the additional grouping in your lookbehind should not be needed.
And last, why is that lookbehind optional (with ?)? Just leave it away if you don't need it. This might even be the source of your pattern syntax error - a lookaround must not be optional.
Try this:
/(?<=00|\+)\d+/
Java:
"(?<=00|\\+)\\d+"
Related
I have this Java code
String cookies = TextUtils.join(";", LoginActivity.msCookieManager.getCookieStore().getCookies());
Log.d("TheCookies", cookies);
Pattern csrf_pattern = Pattern.compile("csrf_cookie=(.+)(?=;)");
Matcher csrf_matcher = csrf_pattern.matcher(cookies);
while (csrf_matcher.find()) {
json.put("csrf_key", csrf_matcher.group(1));
Log.d("CSRF KEY", csrf_matcher.group(1));
}
The String contains something like this:
SessionID=sessiontest;csrf_cookie=e18d027da2fb95e888ebede711f1bc39;ci_session=3f4675b5b56bfd0ba4dae46249de0df7994ee21e
Im trying to get the csrf_cookie data by using this Regular Expression:
csrf_cookie=(.+)(?=;)
I expect a result like this in the code:
csrf_matcher.group(1);
e18d027da2fb95e888ebede711f1bc39
instead I get a:
3492f8670f4b09a6b3c3cbdfcc59e512;ci_session=8d823b309a361587fac5d67ad4706359b40d7bd0
What is the possible work around for this problem?
Here is a one-liner using String#replaceAll:
String input = "SessionID=sessiontest;csrf_cookie=e18d027da2fb95e888ebede711f1bc39;ci_session=3f4675b5b56bfd0ba4dae46249de0df7994ee21e";
String cookie = input.replaceAll(".*csrf_cookie=([^;]*).*", "$1");
System.out.println(cookie);
e18d027da2fb95e888ebede711f1bc39
Demo
Note: We could have used a formal regex pattern matcher, and in face you may want to do this if you need to do this search/replacement often in your code.
You are getting more data than expected because you are using an greedy '+' (It will match as long as it can)
For example the pattern a+ could match on aaa the following: a, aa, and aaa. Where the later is 'preferred' if the pattern is greedy.
So you are matching
csrf_cookie=e18d027da2fb95e888ebede711f1bc39;ci_session=3f4675b5b56bfd0ba4dae46249de0df7994ee21e;
as long as it ends with a ';'. The first ';' is skipped with .+ and the last ';' is found with the possitive lookahead
To make a patter ungreedy/lazy use +? instead of + (so a+? would match a (three times) on aaa string)
So try with:
csrf_cookie=(.+?);
or just match anything that is not a ';'
csrf_cookie=([^;]*);
that way you don't need to make it lazy.
HGSV nomenclature has a pattern:
xxxxx.yyyy:charactersnumbercharacters
I would like to make a regex in java and fetch the all the tokens from above eg:
it should have 5 tokens :
{ 'xxxxx', 'yyyy', 'characters', 'number' , 'characters'}
I have used simple split methodology to fetch the tokens, but I don't find its an optimal solution:
my current code is :
String hgsv = "BRAF.p:V600E";
String[] tokens = hgsv.split(".");
this.symbol = tokens[0];
String type = tokens[1].split(":")[0];
I would like to use Pattern and Matcher in Java. No idea, how to make regex for the above token.
Any clue how to do that?
(even to separate characters, numbers, characters I will be using regex). So why not to use REGEX for entire token.
I found link but this is in Python, I need similar in Java.
I think what you're probably looking for is to use capture groups, like this:
String s = "BRAF.p:V600E";
Pattern p = Pattern.compile("(\\w+)\\.(\\w+):([a-zA-Z]+)(\\d+)([a-zA-Z]+)");
Matcher m = p.matcher(s);
if (m.matches()) {
String[] parts = {m.group(1),
m.group(2),
m.group(3),
m.group(4),
m.group(5)};
// Prints "[BRAF, p, V, 600, E]"
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(parts));
} else {
// The input String is invalid.
}
That's really just a lot like a split, but it's more stable because you're using the pattern to validate the String beforehand.
Note that I have no idea if that is the exact right pattern that you should be using. I don't know the exact details of the HGSV notation you're talking about and your description is actually pretty vague. (What are e.g. xxxxx and yyyy? What are "characters"?) If you link me to some sort of specification or detailed description of this notation I can try to write a regex that's more definitely correct.
Anyhow, my example shows the basic idea. You might also see http://www.regular-expressions.info/brackets.html for more information.
I am having trouble with a regex in salesforce, apex. As I saw that apex is using the same syntax and logic as apex, I aimed this at java developers also.
I debugged the String and it is correct. street equals 'str 3 B'.
When using http://www.regexr.com/, the regex works('\d \w$').
The code:
Matcher hasString = Pattern.compile('\\d \\w$').matcher(street);
if(hasString.matches())
My problem is, that hasString.matches() resolves to false. Can anyone tell me if I did something somewhere wrong? I tried to use it without the $, with difference casing, etc. and I just can't get it to work.
Thanks in advance!
You need to use find instead of matches for partial input match as matches attempts to match complete input text.
Matcher hasString = Pattern.compile("\\d \\w$").matcher(street);
if(hasString.find()) {
// matched
System.out.println("Start position: " + hasString.start());
}
I'm trying to create a regex for a string I write down.
My string is like :
'AUR HALAA /PART="PROJECT" /ROLE="VR_ANALYST" /TYPE="C" /CAPABILITY="S" /ADD' (SUC)
The constant part in regex is :
'AUR
/ROLE=""
The inputs are:
HALAA
VR_ANALYST
I tried the regex like this:
\'(AUR) HALAA .* /ROLE="(.)" .
but it doesnt work.
Could you please show me some tricks to how to do this ?
Try this:
^AUR (\\w+).*?/ROLE="(\\w+)".*$
This regex might work for you
^AUR (\\w+) .*? /ROLE="(\\w+)" .*$
And, you can then use "groups" in Matcher class to get the matching groups which will give you HALAA at group(1) and VR_ANALYST at group(2)
I am trying to a regular expression which extracs the data from a string like
<B Att="text">Test</B><C>Test1</C>
The extracted output needs to be Test and Test1. This is what I have done till now:
public class HelloWorld {
public static void main(String[] args)
{
String s = "<B>Test</B>";
String reg = "<.*?>(.*)<\\/.*?>";
Pattern p = Pattern.compile(reg);
Matcher m = p.matcher(s);
while(m.find())
{
String s1 = m.group();
System.out.println(s1);
}
}
}
But this is producing the result <B>Test</B>. Can anybody point out what I am doing wrong?
Three problems:
Your test string is incorrect.
You need a non-greedy modifier in the group.
You need to specify which group you want (group 1).
Try this:
String s = "<B Att=\"text\">Test</B><C>Test1</C>"; // <-- Fix 1
String reg = "<.*?>(.*?)</.*?>"; // <-- Fix 2
// ...
String s1 = m.group(1); // <-- Fix 3
You also don't need to escape a forward slash, so I removed that.
See it running on ideone.
(Also, don't use regular expressions to parse HTML - use an HTML parser.)
If u are using eclipse there is nice plugin that will help you check your regular expression without writing any class to check it.
Here is link:
http://regex-util.sourceforge.net/update/
You will need to show view by choosing Window -> Show View -> Other, and than Regex Util
I hope it will help you fighting with regular expressions
It almost looks like you're trying to use regex on XML and/or HTML. I'd suggest not using regex and instead creating a parser or lexer to handle this type of arrangement.
I think the bestway to handle and get value of XML nodes is just treating it as an XML.
If you really want to stick to regex try:
<B[^>]*>(.+?)</B\s*>
understanding that you will get always the value of B tag.
Or if you want the value of any tag you will be using something like:
<.*?>(.*?)</.*?>