I have a jsp file pageshow.jsp and the parameter id,
Is there any way to cache the jsp file in server-side based on the url parameter
Requesting page pageshow.jsp?id=100 get from cache instead of building from server
Requesting page pageshow.jsp?id=200 get from cache instead of building from server
Above two pages should have different cache content since their parameter are different
This may avoid the rebuilding the jsp file in server side and also decrease the server load
I'd take a look at using a CachingHttpFilter similar to what AlexR has proposed, but look at using the HTTP headers to control the caching rather than storing data in a roll-your-own-content-cache.
This article explains nicely how to go about comparing the If-Modified-Since HTTP header when a URL is requested subsequent times. It's then up to your Filter to send back a HTTP 304 response.
Comparison of dates:
The client asks the server to a specific page: if the client has
already read the page, it sends a request (to server) containing the
last modification date of its cached page (eg “If-Modified-Since:
21/07/2002 13:47:24 GMT”);There also the header If-Unmodified-Since;
The server compares this date given by the client with the last
modified date of requested page:
if the page on the server has the same date, then the server informs
the client that it can use the version’s page in its cache (“HTTP/1.1
304 Not Modified”). The exchange between client and server stops
there;
if the page on the server is newer, then the server informs the client
of the change (“Last-modified: 21/06/2012 08:45:37 p.m. GMT”) and sent
this page to client. The browser stores the date of last change of the
page.
You will also want to look at the ETag HTTP Header.
Unfortunately caching sounds simple but is often difficult to get right. Tuning your database queries is often the best place to start with improving your application performance.
You can create CachingHttpFilter that is mapped to this JSP page only and does the following:
checks whether cached content exists
if exists just returns it
if does not exist calls chain.doFilter(request, response); that will go to the requested JSP. But passes there special response (response wrapper) that stores all bytes returned by the JSP and caches them.
Related
I am working with a web framework (uPortal) that is handling errors by just throwing an exception and then hanging. The framework works by rendering XML into HTML. When there is an exception, the browser recieves rendered content up to the XML template element that is failing, and then the browser just sits and waits for a timeout. Our team's theory is that the content is sent before the error occurs, which surprised me. Other frameworks I've worked with seem to finish rendering before sending content.
My question is, is there a way to redirect the browser after content has already been sent? In this case, we are in the middle of rendering the content of a <script> tag, but the error could occur potentially anywhere in the html.
My only current thought is to inject some javascript at the top of the page, and to try to change the framework's behavior to fail quickly and close the connection and add </body> and </html> tags when an error occurs. Then the above mentioned javascript would run on pageload and detect if the entire page's content was there and do a client-side redirect if not. Maybe it could look for a special hidden div at the bottom of the page.
Are there any examples of frameworks solving this problem differently or of people using similar framework working around this issue?
You must either capture the error, or capture the output in a buffer. If you can handle the exception, you can probably print a simple script tag like
<script> window.location.href = 'some_new_url';</script>
If the browser understands the doctype to be something related to HTML, it will execute that tag.
If you can capture the output in a buffer, when you handle the error you can decide to send an HTTP redirect to the browser and destroy the output buffer up to that point.
As for other frameowrks, in PHP, you can simply enable output buffering with ob_start(), which won't start sending content until the request is fully completed.
I don't know that framework, but
In http, every response has a response-code associated with it. Since the page is already half-way transferred / rendered that status code (usually "200") was sent (and received) already.
There's no way for the browser to accept another response code (like "301" for redirect) for the same response! Also the server is not able to send another response code, because the original response code was already commited and sent to the client.
Your description of the error and knowledge of the http-protocol implies that there is probably some implementation error in the framework / server components used, OR it was done deliberatly, risking the situation that you are in now...
to redirect a page , you need to set redirect information in header. but you can write header once you start writing content ( may be header is already received by client by the time you compete writing whole document )
But, you can do it in different way as below
1.let document loading complete and record if you need to redirect the page while rendering
2. add a unique request-id identifier for each page load
3. invoke ajax call with request-id ( may be rest call) to server asking if page needs to be redirected.
4. if page needs to be redirected , do so, via javascript in browser at client end.
A HTTP response consists of headers and an optional response content.
Once you have started to write the response to the socket connection you can't revert it. In your example: If you run into an error in the middle of content generation you can't add a redirect header - the header section has already be written.
The statement above is not entirely true: in HTTP chunked transfer encoding the response is sent in separate chunks. The last chunk can have an optional trailer containing entity-header fields and theoretically a redirect header. But if you can use these mechanism is a different question. For instance a servlet container may use chunked transfer encoding but does not give you an API to set the trailer.
But writing must not start immediately: For instance HttpServletResponse maintains a buffer for the response content. If you set headers and start writing the content only the buffer is filled and you still can reset the response and start all over. But once the buffer overflows the response is written to the connection and the HttpServletResponse is now committed.
Such a mechanism gives you way to deal with errors during content generation which happen when the response is not yet committed: Just reset the response and send an error message instead. You could examine your framework if it supports such an mechanism. But obviously this is not a solution for larger responses.
A second way to avoid errors during content generation is simply to make sure that they can't happen. First gather all your data needed for the response (e.g. making unsafe database calls), then in a second step generate the response - the second now step should not fail (except if you have bugs in your code).
You already mentioned a third way to handle an error, by having the client sanitize the response and take some action it errors are detected (e.g. by including a script in the generated HTML response).
The only reliable way to do this is to create a proxy HttpServletResponse object that caches the response. You'd need to give the uPortal this proxy instead of the actual HttpServletResponse, and only send the output using the real response once the processing completes / send redirect if the processing fails.
It is HTTP protocol design limitation that you cannot send HTTP redirect once output was started.
Other possible ways rely on HTML or Javascript redirects, but since you write that the error may happen at any moment, it would be difficult to print it out in a way that the browsers would reliably interpret it as redirect.
My scenario is like this:
I'm building a website where I'm posting an ad regarding a topic. So, after the form filling of ad, the request goes to a REST service class as:
http://localhost:8080/cloudproject/postadvaction?title=tution&tag=tution&description=tution+%401000+%2F+month&category=TUTOR&location=indore
Here, the details of ad go in the database which is MongoDB. After all of this is done I'm redirecting to the profile page of user using Viewable model of jersey, where he can see all the ads posted by him. It is done as:
return new Viewable("/profile.jsp");
After this the response is redirected to profile page of the user.
But the problem is that, on redirecting the response to simply profile.jsp, the URL in the address bar has not changed to http://localhost:8080/profile.jsp, instead, it has remained the same as mentioned above. So, when user refreshes the page, the request of same ad post triggers and the whole process is followed again. Since, database is MongoDB, same ad is stored twice in it and same is displayed on the profile page of user with 2 identical ads.
So, how can I redirect to profile page without having the address of servlet in address bar?
Update: The question is related to PRG technique & Duplicate Form Submissions and not to just redirection.
See Post/Redirect/Get
When a web form is submitted to a server through an HTTP POST request, a web user that attempts to refresh the server response in certain user agents can cause the contents of the original HTTP POST request to be resubmitted, possibly causing undesired results, such as a duplicate web purchase.
To avoid this problem, many web developers use the PRG pattern[1] — instead of returning a web page directly, the POST operation returns a redirection command. The HTTP 1.1 specification introduced the HTTP 303 ("See other") response code to ensure that in this situation, the web user's browser can safely refresh the server response without causing the initial HTTP POST request to be resubmitted. However most common commercial applications in use today (new and old alike) still continue to issue HTTP 302 ("Found") responses in these situations.
With Jersey you can use
Response.seeOther(URI) - Create a new ResponseBuilder for a redirection. Used in the redirect-after-POST (aka POST/redirect/GET) pattern.
You just need to change your method signature to return a Response and return the built Response
return Response.seeOther(URI.create(...)).build();
Also stated about the URI parameter
the redirection URI. If a relative URI is supplied it will be converted into an absolute URI by resolving it relative to the base URI of the application (see UriInfo.getBaseUri()).
I am looking for a clean/simple way in HtmlUnit to request a webpage from a server in a specific language.
To do this i have been trying to request "bankofamerica.com" for their homepage in spanish instead of english.
This is what i have done so far:
I tried to set "Accept-Language" header to "es" in the Http request. I did this using:
myWebClient.addRequestHeader("Accept-Language" , "es");
It did not work. I then created a web request with the following code:
URL myUrl = new URL("https://www.bankofamerica.com/");
WebRequest myRequest = new WebRequest(myUrl);
myRequest.setAdditionalHeader("Accept-Language", "es");
HtmlPage aPage = myWebClient.getPage(myRequest);
Since this failed too i printed out the request object for this url , to check if these headers are being set.
[<url="https://www.bankofamerica.com/", GET, EncodingType[name=application/x-www-form-urlencoded], [], {Accept-Language=es, Accept-Encoding=gzip, deflate, Accept=*/*}, null>]
So the server is being requested for a spanish page but in response its sending the homepage in english (the response header has the value of Content-Language set to en-US)
I did find a hack to retrieve the BOA page in spanish. I visited this page and used the chrome developer tool to get the cookie value from the request
header. I used this value to do the following:
myRequest.setAdditionalHeader("Cookie", "TLTSID= ........._LOCALE_COOKIE=es-US; CONTEXT=es_US; INTL_LANG=es_US; LANG_COOKIE=es_US; hp_pf_anon=anon=((ct=+||st=+||fn=+||zc=+||lang=es_US));..........1870903; throttle_value=43");
I am guessing the answer lies somewhere here.
Here lies my next question. If i am writing a script to retrieve 100 different websites in Spanish (ie Assuming they all have their pages in the spanish) . Is there a clean way in HtmlUnit to accomplish this.
(If cookies is indeed a solution then to create them in htmlunit you need to specify the domain name. One would have to then create cookies for each of the 100 sites. As far as i know there is no way in HtmlUnit to do something like:
Cookie langCookie = new Cookie("All Domains","LANG_COOKIE","es_US");
myWebClient.getCookieManager().addCookie(langCookie);)
NOTE: I am using HtmlUnit 2.12 and setting BrowserVersion.CHROME in the webclient
Thanks.
Regarding your first concern the clear/simple(/only?) way of requesting a webpage in a particular language is, as you said, to set the HTTP Accept-Language request header to the locale(s) you want. That is it.
Now the fact that you request a page in a particular language doesn't mean that you will actually get a page in that language. The server has to be set up to process that HTTP header and respond accordingly. Even if a site has a whole section in spanish it doesn't mean that the site is responding to the HTTP header.
A clear example of this is the page you provided. I performed a quick test on it and found that it is clearly not responding accordingly to the Accept-Language I've set (which was es). Hitting the home page using es resulted in getting results in english. However, the page has a link that states En Español which means In Spanish the page does switch to spanish and you get redirected to https://www.bankofamerica.com?request_locale=es_US.
So you might be tempted to think that the page handles the locale by a request parameter. However, that is not (only) the case. Because if you then open the home page again (without the locale parameter) you will see the Spanish version again. That is clearly a proof that they are being stored somewhere else, most likely in the session, which will most likely be handled by cookies.
That can easily be confirmed by opening a private session or clearing the cookies and confirming this behaviour (I've just done that).
I think that explains the mystery of the webpage existing in Spanish but being fetched in English. (Note how most bank webpages do not conform to basic standards such as responding to simple HTTP requests... and they are handling our money!)
Regarding your second question, it would be like asking What is the recipe to not get ill ever?. It just doesn't depend on you. Also note that your first concerned used the word request while your second concern used the word retrieve. I think it should be clear by now that you can only be 100% sure of what you request but not of what you retrieve.
Regarding setting a value in a cookie manually, that is technically possible. However, that is just like adding another parameter in a get request: http://domain.com?login=yes. The parameter will only be processed by the server if it is expecting it. Otherwise, it will be ignored. That is what will happen to the value in your cookie.
Summary: There are standards to follow. You can try to use them but if the one in the other side doesn't then you won't get the results you expect. Your best choice: do your best and follow the standards.
There's a website www.runescape.com and I'm trying to find a way to login the site and automate entering 2-3 letter words (from a-z0-9) to find a unique list of available usernames. (https://secure.runescape.com/m=displaynames/name.ws)
This is the only page I know of where you can view usernames that are available or taken.
In the form where you change your name--you type in a name and it queries it for you with no form submit needed. In about a second or two, the page will display a lime green "Available" or a red "Not available" in text.
Is there a way in java where I can login to see this page, then enter in values, and read if username(s) are Available or Not available? Can someone help point me in the right direction to do this?
Much appreciation.
By viewing the source code of the web site, I can see that the form is sent via POST to https://secure.runescape.com/m=weblogin/login.ws. You will want to send an HTTP Request to that address with the associated username and password parameters respectively.
There's a Java HTTP Request tutorial on SO Here: Using java.net.URLConnection to fire and handle HTTP requests
After you've sent the HTTP Request to the page, an HTTP Response object should be returned to you that has the body of the entire web page that you're looking for. Most likely, you'll need to use RegEx to scan through the body of text and filter out the data you want e.g. <li>([a-z0-9]{1,20})<\/li>
Handling the HTTP Response object is also available on the link provided.
I'm trying to forward a request to another URL which includes the hash symbol ('#'):
request.getRequestDispatcher("/some/path.jsp#somehash").forward(request, response);
Tomcat, however, tells me that "the requested resource is not available". If I remove the hash from the URL, everything works fine. Are hashes not allowed or am I not treating them right?
The # symbol is a browser thing, not a server thing. When you type a URL with a # into the browser, the browser doesn't send that part to the server. It sends the URL without it, then jumps to the named anchor when it gets the page back.
When you ask the container to get that URL for you, it doesn't treat the # any differently to any other URL - it has no special meaning for it, so it looks for a JSP page called /some/path.jsp#somehash, which of course doesn't exist.
You'll need to keep that jump-to-anchor logic on the client somehow. Perhaps you could put some javascript on the resulting page to scroll to that point in the document.
URL fragments are purely client side. The RequestDispatcher#forward() is entirely server-side. The in the forward given URL won't be sent to the client side. You can however redirect to the given URL using HttpServletResponse#sendRedirect(). The URL fragment will then be sent to the client side and reflected in browser address bar as well. Redirecting the request has however the disadvantage that the current request will be garbaged and a brand new one will be created. If that's not affordable, then you'll indeed have to look in the JavaScript corner for the solution.