i have an class with the following annotations:
class A {
public Map<String,List<String>> references;
#JsonProperty
public Map<String,List<String>> getReferences() {
...
}
#JsonIgnore
public void setReferences(Map<String,List<String>>) {
}
...
}
}
What I try is to ignore the json on deserialization. But it doesn't work. Always when JSON String arrives the Jackson lib fill the references attribute. If I use only the #JsonIgnore annotation the getter doesn't work. Are there any solutions for this problem?
Thanks
I think there are two key pieces that should enable you to have "read-only collections" as desired. First, in addition to ignoring the setter, ensure that your field is also marked with #JsonIgnore:
class A {
#JsonIgnore
public Map<String,List<String>> references;
#JsonProperty
public Map<String,List<String>> getReferences() { ... }
#JsonIgnore
public void setReferences(Map<String,List<String>>) { ... }
}
Second, in order to prevent the getters from being used as setters, disable the USE_GETTERS_AS_SETTERS feature:
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
mapper.disable(MapperFeature.USE_GETTERS_AS_SETTERS);
As of Jackson 2.6, there is a new and improved way to define read-only and write-only properties, using JsonProperty#access() annotation. This is recommended over use of separate JsonIgnore and JsonProperty annotations.
#JsonProperty(access = JsonProperty.Access.READ_ONLY)
public Map<String,List<String>> references;
You have to make sure there is #JsonIgnore annotation on the field level as well as on the setter, and getter annotated with #JsonProperty.
public class Echo {
#Null
#JsonIgnore
private String doNotDeserialise;
private String echo;
#JsonProperty
public String getDoNotDeserialise() {
return doNotDeserialise;
}
#JsonIgnore
public void setDoNotDeserialise(String doNotDeserialise) {
this.doNotDeserialise = doNotDeserialise;
}
public String getEcho() {
return echo;
}
public void setEcho(String echo) {
this.echo = echo;
}
}
#Controller
public class EchoController {
#ResponseBody
#RequestMapping(value = "/echo", consumes = APPLICATION_JSON_VALUE, produces = APPLICATION_JSON_VALUE)
public Echo echo(#RequestBody #Valid Echo echo) {
if (StringUtils.isEmpty(echo.getDoNotDeserialise())) {
echo.setDoNotDeserialise("Value is set by the server, not by the client!");
}
return echo;
}
}
If you submit a JSON request with a “doNotDeserialise” value set to something, when JSON is deserialised to an object it will be set to null (if not I put a validation constraint on the field so it will error out)
If you set the “doNotDeserialise” value to something on the server then it will be correctly serialised to JSON and pushed to the client
I used #JsonIgnore on my getter and it didn't work and I couldn't configure the mapper (I was using Jackson Jaxrs providers). This worked for me:
#JsonIgnoreProperties(ignoreUnknown = true, value = { "actorsAsString",
"writersAsString", "directorsAsString", "genresAsString" })
I can only think of a non-jackson solution, to use a base class that does not have references for the mapping and then cast to the actual class:
// expect a B on an incoming request
class B {
// ...
}
// after the data is read, cast to A which will have empty references
class A extends B {
public Map<String,List<String>> references;
}
Why do you even send the References if you don't want them?
Or is the incoming data out of your hands and you just want to avoid the mapping exception telling you that jackson cannot find a property to set for incoming references? For that we use a base class which all of our Json model classes inherit:
public abstract class JsonObject {
#JsonAnySetter
public void handleUnknown(String key, Object value) {
// for us we log an error if we can't map but you can skip that
Log log = LogFactory.getLog(String.class);
log.error("Error mapping object of type: " + this.getClass().getName());
log.error("Could not map key: \"" + key + "\" and value: \"" + "\"" + value.toString() + "\"");
}
Then in the POJO you add #JsonIgnoreProperties so that incoming properties will get forwarded to handleUnknown()
#JsonIgnoreProperties
class A extends JsonObject {
// no references if you don't need them
}
edit
This SO Thread describes how to use Mixins. This might be the solution, if you want to keep your structure exactly as it is, but I have not tried it.
Related
I have a POJO and I am using Jackson to deserialize it into the POJO.I want to log key value attributes which I'm not aware of. For this I use JsonAnySetter in the following manner:
#Value
#Slf4j
#Builder
public class Book {
private String titleId;
private String bookName;
private List<String> authors;
#JsonAnySetter
public void ignored(String key, Object value) {
log.warn("Received a key which hasn't been mapped. Key: {}, Value: {}", key, value);
}
}
Now to test this in my Junit how do I verify that the method ignored is called?
#Test
public void given_unknown_key_ensure_it_is_logged() {
ObjectMapper objectMapper = new ObjectMapper();
String test = "{\"randomField\": \"test\"}";
Book book = objectMapper.readValue(test, Book.class);
ArgumentCaptor<Book> captor = ArgumentCaptor.forClass(Book.class);
verify(book, times(1)).ignored("randomField", "test");
}
I need to use the actual Book object, but that has to be mocked as well, so not sure how I should proceed in this case.
Create a mock object of the Log object and set it in the Book class.
This assumes that the Log object is static,
which seems reasonable.
We've defined a model in our service code as -
#JsonSerialize(include = JsonSerialize.Inclusion.NON_NULL)
public class SomeData {
public boolean tnAvailable;
#NonNull
public String sTempChange;
public boolean isTnAvailable() {
return faAvailable;
}
public void setTnAvailable(boolean faAvailable) {
this.faAvailable = faAvailable;
}
#Nonnull
public String getSTempChange() {
return sTempChange;
}
public void setSTempChange(#Nonnull String sTempChange) {
this.sTempChange = sTempChange;
}
}
When the api including the above model in response is queried , we get the response as -
"someData": {
"tnAvailable": true,
"stempChange": "trial_001"
}
What surprised us was the stempChange(notice lowercase t) instead of sTempChange in the attributes of the response.
Suspecting the cause to be Jackson com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core:2.5.2 while serializing and deserializing of the objects during API calls since we do not alter the attribute using any other getter-setter ot wrapper.
Why would this so happen and is serialization/deserialization the correct direction to look for this?
Edit - From the comment by #Windle, trying to explain what's different here. I re-iterate "The question though there relates pretty much to the same situation. Yet I 'm looking forward to the reason's for such implementation and documentation in fasterxml as well."
Handling of multiple leading capital letters in getters/setters (like "getURL()", or "getFName()").
By default, Jackson will simply lower-case ALL leading upper-case letters, giving "url" and "fname".
But if you enable MapperFeature.USE_STD_BEAN_NAMING (added in Jackson 2.5), it will follow what Java Bean naming convention would do, which is only lower-case a single upper-case leading letter; if multiple found, do nothing.
That would result in properties "URL" and "FName".
Yeah it looks like it's getting confused on the method name. You can force the serialized name with the #JsonGetter annotation
#JsonGetter("sTempChange")
public String getSTempChange() {
return sTempChange;
}
When I first tried out your SomeData class and serialized it I got the following results:
{"tnAvailable":true,"sTempChange":"trial_000","stempChange":"trial_000"}
This means that jackson doesn't match your getters/setters with the sTempChange property and they are treated as different properties. After adding the following configuration for my mapper I was able to reproduce your case:
ObjectMapper objectMapper = new ObjectMapper();
objectMapper.setVisibility(PropertyAccessor.ALL, JsonAutoDetect.Visibility.NONE);
objectMapper.setVisibility(PropertyAccessor.GETTER, JsonAutoDetect.Visibility.ANY);
objectMapper.setVisibility(PropertyAccessor.SETTER, JsonAutoDetect.Visibility.ANY);
objectMapper.setVisibility(PropertyAccessor.IS_GETTER, JsonAutoDetect.Visibility.ANY);
Now the reason for your error is because Jackson uses its own implementation of bean utilities (com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.util.BeanUtil) which is used when a class is processed for fields, getters and setters (done by com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.introspect.POJOPropertiesCollector) when an instance is serialized/deserialized. Methods of interests are okNameForGetter and okNameForSetter. In those methods there are 2 other methods used depending on the MapperFeature.USE_STD_BEAN_NAMING (it is passed in the stdNaming argument in all methods). The two methods are used in the following manner:
return stdNaming
? stdManglePropertyName(name, prefix.length())
: legacyManglePropertyName(name, prefix.length());
The stdManglePropertyName follows the Java Beans specification in section 8.8 and the legacyManglePropertyName does not and is used in versions prior to 2.5 of Jackson.
Now after running your getter and setter method names through this methods, however you set MapperFeature.USE_STD_BEAN_NAMING, your getter/setter for sTempChange property is wrongly named. It should be getsTempChange (lowercase 's') and getsTempChange (again lowercase 's') to correctly serialize and deserialize the instances of SomeData class.
Finally here is some code for testing:
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper;
public class Test {
static class SomeData {
public boolean tnAvailable;
public String sTempChange;
public String getsTempChange() {
return sTempChange;
}
public void setsTempChange(String sTempChange) {
this.sTempChange = sTempChange;
}
public boolean isTnAvailable() {
return tnAvailable;
}
public void setTnAvailable(boolean tnAvailable) {
this.tnAvailable = tnAvailable;
}
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
ObjectMapper objectMapper = new ObjectMapper();
// objectMapper.configure(MapperFeature.USE_STD_BEAN_NAMING, true);
SomeData someData = new SomeData();
someData.setsTempChange("trial_000");
someData.setTnAvailable(true);
// objectMapper.setVisibility(PropertyAccessor.ALL, JsonAutoDetect.Visibility.NONE);
// objectMapper.setVisibility(PropertyAccessor.GETTER, JsonAutoDetect.Visibility.ANY);
// objectMapper.setVisibility(PropertyAccessor.SETTER, JsonAutoDetect.Visibility.ANY);
// objectMapper.setVisibility(PropertyAccessor.IS_GETTER, JsonAutoDetect.Visibility.ANY);
try {
System.out.println("Serialize: " + objectMapper.writeValueAsString(someData));
String json = "{ \"tnAvailable\": false, \"sTempChange\": \"trial_001\" }";
SomeData anotherData = objectMapper.readValue(json, SomeData.class);
System.out.println("Deserialize: " + anotherData.isTnAvailable() + ", " + anotherData.getsTempChange());
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
I am trying to de-serialize this JSON object using Jackson 2.8 as part of Retrofit response. Here is the JSON response I get from the server.
{
"id":"8938209912"
"version":"1.1"
"cars":{
"mercedes":[
{
"property":"color"
},
{
"property":"price"
},
{
"property":"location"
}
],
"tesla":[
{
"property":"environment"
}
]
}
}
Based on the query, the cars above may have one or more models returned. I cannot create a class each for each model as these get created/removed arbitrarily. For each model of the car (say tesla), there may be one or more property key-value pairs.
I am new to Jackson. I have been looking at several examples and looks like a custom #JsonDeserialize is the best way to go. So, I created Root class and Cars class like this:
// In file Root.java
public class Root {
#JsonProperty("id")
private String id = null;
#JsonProperty("version")
private String version = null;
#JsonProperty("cars")
private Cars cars = null;
}
// In file Cars.java
public class Cars {
public Cars(){}
#JsonDeserialize(using = CarDeserializer.class)
private Map<String, List<Property>> properties;
public Map<String, List<Property>> getProperties() {
return properties;
}
public void setProperties(Map<String, List<Property>> properties) {
this.properties = properties;
}
}
// Property.java
public class Property {
#JsonProperty("property")
private String property;
}
My de-serializer is below. However, even though the empty constructor gets called, the parse method itself is not called at all!
// CarDeserializer.class
public class RelationshipDeserializer extends StdDeserializer<Map<String, List<Action>>>{
protected RelationshipDeserializer(){
super(Class.class);
}
#Override
public Map<String, List<Action>> deserialize(JsonParser parser, DeserializationContext ctx)
throws IOException, JsonProcessingException
{
// This method never gets invoked.
}
}
My questions:
Is this the right approach in the first place?
Why do you think the execution never gets to the deserialize()? (I checked, the cars object is present in JSON.
Are there better approaches to parse this JSON using Jackson?
The "properties" deserializer is never called because that does not match anything in that JSON. The field name in the JSON is "property" and it does not match Map<String, List<Property>>. It looks like it would be closer to List<Property>
Do you control the in coming JSON? It would be better for the car name/type to be in its own field rather than the name of the object. Then you can use a generic object. What you have now is going to break. Any time they add a new name/type and you do not have a matching object for it.
My REST service returns following JSON
{
"name": "John",
"id" : 10
}
Can I use Jersey to marshall it into following Bean:
public class User{
private String name;
//getter & setter
}
I wanted to do this with following code but it doesn't work
WebResource webResource = client.resource(url);
webResource.accept(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON_TYPE);
User user = webResource.get(User.class);
Is this even possible or I have to implement full JSON structure in Java Beans to get it work?
I know that I can parse this JSON with Jackson and any other methods.
With Jackson, easiest way is to configure ObjectMapper like so:
objectMapper.configure(DeserializationConfig.Feature.FAIL_ON_UNKNOWN_PROPERTIES,
false);
Check this sample provider
package com.company.rest.jersey;
#Provider
#Component
#Produces({MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON})
public class JacksonMapperProvider implements ContextResolver<ObjectMapper> {
ObjectMapper mapper;
public JacksonMapperProvider(){
mapper = new ObjectMapper();
mapper.configure(Feature.INDENT_OUTPUT, true);
// Serialize dates using ISO8601 format
// Jackson uses timestamps by default, so use StdDateFormat to get ISO8601
mapper.getSerializationConfig().setDateFormat(new StdDateFormat());
// Deserialize dates using ISO8601 format
// MilliDateFormat simply adds milliseconds to string if missing so it will parse
mapper.getDeserializationConfig().setDateFormat(new MilliDateFormat());
// Prevent exceptions from being thrown for unknown properties
mapper.configure(
DeserializationConfig.Feature.FAIL_ON_UNKNOWN_PROPERTIES,false);
}
#Override
public ObjectMapper getContext(Class<?> aClass) {
return mapper;
}
}
With Jackson :
You have two options:
Jackson works on setters-getters of fields. So, you can just remove getter of field which you want to omit in JSON. ( If you don't need getter at other place.)
Or, you can use the #JsonIgnore annotation of Jackson on getter method of that field and you see there in no such key-value pair in resulted JSON.
#JsonIgnore
public int getSecurityCode(){
return securityCode;
}
In your bean, add the annotation #JsonIgnoreProperties(ignoreUnknown = true) at the class level and it should skip the id property in the JSON since it's not present in the bean.
#JsonIgnoreProperties(ignoreUnknown = true)
public class User{
private String name;
//getter & setter
}
(See http://wiki.fasterxml.com/JacksonAnnotations for details)
I have the following class which contains a String field and a Map field. I want to use Jackson to serialize it to json.
public class Mapping
private String mAttribute;
#JsonIgnore
private Map<String, String> mMap;
#JsonAnyGetter
public Map<String, String> getMap() {
//some logic to populate map
}
#JsonAnySetter
public void put(// some params) {
//some more logic
}
#JsonProperty(value = "attribute")
public String getAttribute() {
return mAttribute;
}
public void setAttribute(String aAttribute) {
mAttribute= aAttribute;
}
}
I instantiate a Mapping object and then use ObjectMapper to write it to a file.
ObjectMapper om = new ObjectMapper();
om.writeValue(destFile, myMappingObject);
For some reason, it's writing the Mapping instance myMappingObject twice. I'm assuming I've not set some visibility option somewhere but I don't know where.
The json looks like this, only it comes up twice in the file.
{
"attribute" : "someValue",
"map-key1" : "map-value1",
"map-key2" : "map-value2"
}
There's this, but apparently it was fixed in previous version of Jackson. I also tried changing the name of the method to random() and it still gets called twice (the number of times it should).
The problem had nothing to do with the above class. I was using another class that had a list of Mappings. Before:
public class MappingsList {
#JsonProperty
private List<Mapping> mappings;
public List<Mapping> getMappings() {return mappings;}
}
After:
public class MappingsList {
private List<Mapping> mappings;
#JsonProperty
public List<Mapping> getMappings() {return mappings;}
}
And it worked. The cause is that the ObjectMapper was seeing two (2) properties in the MappingsList class and therefore doing serialization on both. First it would create json for the mappings field and then again for the getMappings() method.