I need to get the extension number from the "From header", I have tried everything but nothing worked.
Even tried to do:
byte[] raw = req.getRawContent();
And manually find the From and the number, But that returned null
What am I doing wrong? How to get that number
Get the FromHeader and then extract the information you need from it. For instance, if the extension is the user part of the URI:
FromHeader fromHeader = (FromHeader) req.getHeader("From");
Address fromAddress = fromHeader.getAddress();
URI fromURI = fromAddress.getURI();
if (fromURI.isSipURI()) {
SipURI fromSipURI = (SipURI) fromURI;
extension = fromSipURI.getUser();
}
Did you saw the javadoc?
The method getRawContent() return a message content as a raw byte array, or null if no content is set
Can you explain again your question? Maybe I can help you.
Related
I am quite new to this, and I am struggling with one issue.
In Java Compute Node, through IIB, I am checking if one field has one or more values, and for each additional value I am creating a new duplicate message, except for value, these additional values are overriding.
This is working fine as a expect, see example:
Input :...
</leg_flight_no><lineNumber>2</lineNumber><shipper_name>BMW AG</shipper_name> <shipper_reference_hu>1111111;22222222;333333333</shipper_reference_hu></root>
Modified message 1:...
</leg_flight_no><lineNumber>2</lineNumber><shipper_name>BMW AG</shipper_name> <shipper_reference_hu>1111111</shipper_reference_hu></root>
Modified message 2:..
</leg_flight_no><lineNumber>2</lineNumber><shipper_name>BMW AG</shipper_name> <shipper_reference_hu>22222222</shipper_reference_hu></root>
Modified message3 :...
</leg_flight_no><lineNumber>2</lineNumber><shipper_name>BMW AG</shipper_name> <shipper_reference_hu>333333333</shipper_reference_hu></root>
But I am struggling to propagate this message out from the Java Compute node. I understand that I cant propagate messages of type String, so I am trying to parse this as a MbMessageAssemble outAssemble. This is my code:
String newMessage = inData.replace(wholeValues, outData); // replace one value with another
MbMessage outMessage = new MbMessage();
MbMessageAssembly outAssembly = new MbMessageAssembly(inAssembly, outMessage);
copyMessageHeaders(inMessage, outMessage);
MbElement outRoot = outMessage.getRootElement();
MbElement outParser = outRoot.createElementAsLastChild(MbBLOB.PARSER_NAME);
MbElement outBodyEl2 = outParser.createElementAsLastChild(MbElement.TYPE_NAME_VALUE, "BLOB", newMessage.getBytes());
alt.propagate(outAssembly);
But this is propagate an empty message, so the newMessage is not parsed to outAssembly. Can anybody with this experience help me with this?
I figured it out. For future, here is your answer
String newMessage = "this is some test";
MbMessage outMessage=new MbMessage();
outMessage.getRootElement().createElementAsLastChild(MbBLOB.PARSER_NAME).createElementAsLastChild(MbElement.TYPE_NAME_VALUE, "BLOB", newMessage.getBytes());
MbMessageAssembly outAssembly = new MbMessageAssembly(inAssembly, outMessage);
out.propagate(outAssembly);
I'm trying to use something like this:
UpdateEventSourceMappingRequest request = new UpdateEventSourceMappingRequest()
.withFunctionName("arn:aws:lambda:us-east-1:9999999999:function:"+functionName)
.withEnabled(false);
But I received a error because I have to use .withUUID(uuid):
UpdateEventSourceMappingRequest request = new UpdateEventSourceMappingRequest()
.withUUID(uuid))
.withFunctionName("arn:aws:lambda:us-east-1:9999999999:function:"+functionName)
.withEnabled(false);
I don't know how to get the value of uuid ( uuid from aws lambda ).
Can you help me with the solution to my problem ?
You need to provide the UUID identifier of the event source mapping to update it (and this field is mandatory). Update-request is not intended to create it.
When you create an event source mapping (here) - aws should return a response with a UUID identifier which you then may use in the update request.
That's the solution that I founded:
String strUUID = "";
ListEventSourceMappingsRequest requestList = new ListEventSourceMappingsRequest()
.withEventSourceArn("arn:aws:sqs:us-east-1:9999999999:test");
ListEventSourceMappingsResult result = awsLambda.listEventSourceMappings(requestList);
List<EventSourceMappingConfiguration> eventSourceMappings = result.getEventSourceMappings();
for (EventSourceMappingConfiguration eventLambda : eventSourceMappings) {
strUUID = eventLambda.getUUID();
}
System.out.println("Output UUID " + strUUID);
We have to use the ARN of the SQS that's trigger of the aws lambda.
Need a quick help. I am a newbie in QuickFixJ. I have a FIX message in a txt file. I need to convert that into FIX50SP2 format. I am enclosing the code snippet.
String fixMsg = "1128=99=25535=X49=CME34=47134052=20100318-03:21:11.36475=20120904268=2279=122=848=336683=607400107=ESU2269=1270=140575271=152273=121014000336=2346=521023=1279=122=848=336683=607401107=ESU2269=1270=140600271=206273=121014000336=2346=681023=210=159";
System.out.println("FixMsg String:"+fixMsg);
Message FIXMessage = new Message();
DataDictionary dd = new DataDictionary("FIX50SP2.xml");
FIXMessage.fromString(fixMsg, dd, false);
System.out.println("FIXMessage Output:" + FIXMessage.toString()); // Print message after parsing
MsgType msgType = new MsgType();
System.out.println(FIXMessage.getField(msgType));
Here is the output:
FixMsg String:1128=99=15835=X49=CME34=47164052=2012090312102051175=20120904268=1279=122=848=336683=607745107=ESU2269=1270=140575271=123273=121020000336=2346=501023=110=205
FIXMessage Output:9=6135=X34=47164049=CME52=2012090312102051175=20120904268=110=117
quickfix.FieldNotFound: Field [35] was not found in message.
at quickfix.FieldMap.getField(FieldMap.java:216)
at quickfix.FieldMap.getFieldInternal(FieldMap.java:353)
at quickfix.FieldMap.getField(FieldMap.java:349)
at MainApp.main(MainApp.java:52)
I want to extract MsgType field (field 35). Could you please tell me where I am wrong? The thing I have observed is that after parsing to FIX50SP2 format, the convert FIX message is missing many data element (for details see the output)
Thanks
Like others mentioned the MsgType is an header field and you get it by using the following
String msgType = null;
if(FIXMessage.getHeader().isSetField(MsgType.FIELD)) {
msgType = FIXMessage.getHeader().getString(MsgType.FIELD);
}
System.out.println("MsgType is " + msgType);`
The reason you are missing many data element after parsing is, probably your message have some custom tags(like tag 2346), which is not defined in your data dictionary(FIXSP02.xml). hence the parsing of those tags failed and missing in the output.
To fix this, get the data dictionary from the party that is sending you the message and use it to parse the message
I'm not familiar with FIX messages and QuickFixJ, but glancing at the Javadoc, it seems like you should use the identifyType method :
String fixMsg = "1128=99=25535=X49=CME34=47134052=20100318-03:21:11.36475=20120904268=2279=122=848=336683=607400107=ESU2269=1270=140575271=152273=121014000336=2346=521023=1279=122=848=336683=607401107=ESU2269=1270=140600271=206273=121014000336=2346=681023=210=159";
MsgType msgType = Message.identifyType(fixMsg);
You may find FixB framework useful as it deals well with non-standard use cases of FIX.
As in your case, to extract only data you are interested in, you need to define a class that will represent this data and to bind it to FIX using annotations. E.g.:
#FixBlock
public class MDEntry {
#FixField(tag=269) public int entryType; // you could define an enum type for it as well
#FixField(tag=278) public String entryId;
#FixField(tag=55) public String symbol;
}
...
FixFieldExtractor fixExtractor = new NativeFixFieldExtractor();
List<MDEntry> mdEntries = fixExtractor.getGroups(fixMsg, List.class, 268, FixMetaScanner.scanClass(MDEntry.class))
In more common cases, FixSerializer interface should be used, but it requires a message with MsgType(35) tag and a class annotated with #FixMessage(type="...") accordingly. E.g.:
#FixMessage(type="X")
public class MarketData {
#FixGroup(tag=268) public List<MDEntry> entries;
}
...
FixMetaDictionary fixMetaDictionary = FixMetaScanner.scanClassesIn("my.fix.classes.package");
FixSerializer fixSerializer = new NativeFixSerializer("FIX.5.0.SP2", fixMetaDictionary);
MarketData marketData = fixSerializer.deserialize(fixMsg);
I hope you will find it useful.
If you need just a MsgTyp, you're sure the message is correct and you do not need any other field from the message, then I would recommend extracting MsgType from string using regexp.
e.g.: \u000135=(\w+)\u0001
It is MUCH FASTER than parsing (and validating) a string via QuickFix.
I'm doing a recursive url harvest.. when I find an link in the source that doesn't start with "http" then I append it to the current url. Problem is when I run into a dynamic site the link without an http is usually a new parameter for the current url. For example if the current url is something like http://www.somewebapp.com/default.aspx?pageid=4088 and in the source for that page there is a link which is default.aspx?pageid=2111. In this case I need do some string manipulation; this is where I need help.
pseudocode:
if part of the link found is a contains a substring of the current url
save the substring
save the unique part of the link found
replace whatever is after the substring in the current url with the unique saved part
What would this look like in java? Any ideas for doing this differently? Thanks.
As per comment, here's what I've tried:
if (!matched.startsWith("http")) {
String[] splitted = url.toString().split("/");
java.lang.String endOfURL = splitted[splitted.length-1];
boolean b = false;
while (!b && endOfURL.length() > 5) { // f.bar shortest val
endOfURL = endOfURL.substring(0, endOfURL.length()-2);
if (matched.contains(endOfURL)) {
matched = matched.substring(endOfURL.length()-1);
matched = url.toString().substring(url.toString().length() - matched.length()) + matched;
b = true;
}
}
it's not working well..
I think you are doing this the wrong way. Java has two classes URL and URI which are capable of parsing URL/URL strings much more accurately than a "string bashing" solution. For example the URL constructor URL(URL, String) will create a new URL object in the context of an existing one, without you needing to worry whether the String is an absolute URL or a relative one. You would use it something like this:
URL currentPageUrl = ...
String linkUrlString = ...
// (Exception handling not included ...)
URL linkUrl = new URL(currentPageUrl, linkUrlString);
Is there any way to have message.properties records as follows
message.myMessage=This message is for ${name} in ${location}
as opposed to
message.myMessage = This message is for {0} in {1}
When I am creating the messages, I don't neccessarily know the order / how many parameters are needed, but I am able just pass in several properties by name, and just the correct ones would be used.
After facing the very same question and poking in source code I found a "loop-hole" that makes it possible in a very easy way:
message.myMessage = This message is for {0,,name} in {1,,location}
This approach doesn't eliminate usage of numbers. The reason to use it is to give hints to translation folks.
I am afraid not, parameters are an Object array so there is no way to define names for them. If you always passes in the array of parameter in the same order though you could use them like this:
message.myMessage = This message is for {0} in {1}
message.myNameMessage = This message is for {0}
message.myLocationMessage = This message is for people in {1}
message.myAlternateMessage = The message params are location: {1}; name: {0}
Take a look at ICU4J
It allows for something like this:
message.myMessage=This message is for {name} in {location}.
And it is way more powerful than the simple replacements suggested, because can do locale aware formatting of the parameters (ie: "Subscription expires on: {expirationDate, date, long})
http://icu-project.org/apiref/icu4j/com/ibm/icu/text/MessageFormat.html
Unfortunately the MessageFormat API does not support named parameters, only argument-index:
Patterns and Their Interpretation
MessageFormat uses patterns of the following form:
MessageFormatPattern:
String
MessageFormatPattern FormatElement String
FormatElement:
{ ArgumentIndex }
{ ArgumentIndex , FormatType }
{ ArgumentIndex , FormatType , FormatStyle }
Everything is possible for those who try... I never heard about something like that for Java, but you can write it by yourself.
Please take a look at this example:
public String format(String message, String... arguments) {
for (String argument : arguments) {
String[] keyValue = argument.split("=");
if (keyValue.length != 2)
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Incorrect argument: " + argument);
String placeholder = "${" + keyValue[0] + "}";
if (!message.contains(placeholder))
throw new IllegalArgumentException(keyValue[0] + " does not exists.");
while (message.contains(placeholder))
message = message.replace(placeholder, keyValue[1]);
}
return message;
}
It is not ideal, as you actually would call it with hardcoded string (which is generally bad idea) and you would be forced to use Strings only, but it can be done. The only question is if it is practical.
It is possible using apache commons lang library.
https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-lang/
Properties messages = ...
Map<String, String> m = new HashMap<>();
m.put("name", "Mithu");
m.put("location", "Dhaka");
StrSubstitutor sub = new StrSubstitutor(m);
String msg = sub.replace(messages.getProperty("message.myMessage"));
// msg = This message is for Mithu in Dhaka