I want expose instances managed by an external framework to CDI applications using #Inject. These instances must be provided this other framework since their lifecycle is based on various caching strategies.
Ex: same instance is visible within same thread scope, might live across many request scopes, session scope is not applicable. Seems I need to define a new scope targeting these kind of instances?
What is the best way to do this? An extension, is it possible with producer methods?
I almost got it to work with producer methods using the following:
#Inject
#CustomInject
FwObject obj;
#Produces
#CustomInject
FwObject createConfig(InjectionPoint p) {
return (FwObject) ctx.get((Class<?>) p.getType());
}
But this force me to be explicit about the type produced which is not possible since there is no common framework interface.
Any help appreciated.
Maybe with producer methods, all depends on what you need, but an extension is probably the best way to go. If you need to go with a new scope (if you're using JSF the Conversation scope may work) you will certainly need to create an extension.
I think I solved it by creating a custom scope. The following article was really helpful:
http://www.verborgh.be/articles/2010/01/06/porting-the-viewscoped-jsf-annotation-to-cdi/
This is a very brief description of how I solved it.
Create custom scope annotation.
import javax.enterprise.context.NormalScope;
#Retention(java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
#Target({ ElementType.TYPE, ElementType.METHOD })
#NormalScope
public #interface CustomScope {
}
Create custom context.
import javax.enterprise.context.spi.Context;
public class CustomContext implements Context {
private MyFw myFw = .... ;
#Override
public Class<? extends Annotation> getScope() {
return CustomScope.class;
}
#Override
public <T> T get(Contextual<T> contextual, CreationalContext<T> creationalContext) {
Bean bean = (Bean) contextual;
return (T) myFw.get(bean.getBeanClass());
}
#Override
public <T> T get(Contextual<T> contextual) {
Bean bean = (Bean) contextual;
return (T) myFw.get(bean.getBeanClass());
}
#Override
public boolean isActive() {
return true;
}
}
Create extension and register context.
import javax.enterprise.inject.spi.Extension;
public class CustomContextExtension implements Extension {
public void afterBeanDiscovery(#Observes AfterBeanDiscovery event, BeanManager manager) {
event.addContext(new CustomContext());
}
}
Register extension.
Add CustomContextExtension to META-INF/javax.enterprise.inject.spi.Extension
Add CustomScope to framework object.
#CustomScope
public class FwObject { ... }
Inject FwObject using #Inject where needed.
public class MyService {
#Inject
FwObject obj;
}
Related
In a Spring application that uses HTTP remoting, I have a service façade module configured as follows (I made the code generic to improve clarity):
#Configuration
public class MyFacadeConfig {
private HttpInvokerServiceExporter facade(Class<?> cls) {
HttpInvokerServiceExporter bean = new HttpInvokerServiceExporter();
// The service referred to by this exporter is already instantiated as another Spring bean with all its dependencies.
bean.setService(appContext.getBean(cls));
bean.setServiceInterface(cls);
return bean;
}
#Bean("/first.service")
public HttpInvokerServiceExporter firstServiceFacade() {
return facade(FirstService.class);
}
#Bean("/second.service")
public HttpInvokerServiceExporter secondServiceFacade() {
return facade(SecondService.class);
}
// ... and so on for the 37 other services
}
where FirstService and SecondService are interfaces with existing implementations whose detail is not needed here.
I have another module that defines 39 proxies (instances of HttpInvokerProxyFactoryBean) corresponding to each of my services exposed through my façade.
So far, everything works properly.
But I would like to make the code more generic, elegant, and robust while mitigating the risk of error (e.g., a bad mapping between a service and its proxy in the future). The way I would like to do this is as follows:
First, I move the façade/proxy metadata into an enumeration:
public enum ConfigBeansFacade {
FIRST("/first", FirstService.class),
SECOND("/second", SecondService.class)
// ... and so on for the 37 other services
;
private String beanName;
private Class<?> serviceInterface;
// Constructor and getters
public String getCompleteBeanName() {
return beanName + ".service";
}
}
Then the configuration of the façade would be simplified in a style similar to the following:
#Configuration
public class MyFacadeConfig {
#Autowired
private ConfigurableBeanFactory beanFactory;
#Autowired
public void configExporters() {
for (ConfigBeansFacade bean : ConfigBeansFacade.values()) {
HttpInvokerServiceExporter exp = new HttpInvokerServiceExporter();
exp.setService(beanFactory.getBean(bean.getServiceInterface()));
exp.setServiceInterface(bean.getServiceInterface());
beanFactory.registerSingleton(bean.getCompleteBeanName(), exp);
}
}
}
I tried every single recipe I found in online forums, including StackOverflow, but there are two constraints not met elsewhere:
When defining the exporters, the underlying services are other Spring beans that are instantiated, initialized, and registered with their own configuration and dependencies through the standard Spring mechanics. There is no direct class instantiation other than the exporters themselves.
I thought about grouping the exporters into a single collection as suggested by some people. The only problem is that Spring MVC uses the HttpInvokerServiceExporter Spring bean names as endpoint URIs when registering the exporters into its own configuration. I must therefore register each exporter as a “first-class citizen” bean with its own bean name into the application context.
Given these constraints, the problem I have arises in (1) when I try to retrieve the underlying services to be encapsulated into exporters: they are not necessarily ready yet, which results into UnsatisfiedDependencyExceptions.
I tried solutions with a #PostContruct-annotated method, with a BeanPostProcessor, with an #Autowired method (as shown above), nothing is working as required.
Does anyone know about a way or a technique to initialize and register multiple beans inside a single method under my constraints described above? Such a method doesn't need to be annotated with #Bean, #Autowired, or any other specific annotation, it's just an example of what I tried.
In the client module, mercifully, the HttpInvokerProxyFactoryBean instances need only the interfaces and the bean names, so constraint (1) above should not apply.
Thanks in advance for any help you can provide...
I'm not 100% I've understood what you're trying to do but I wonder if you could try autowiring a List of beans that implement an interface?
e.g.
public interface MyService {
String getKey();
void doStuff();
}
Then implement as many of these as you require
e.g.
#Component
public class FirstService implements MyService {
public String getKey() {
return "/first";
}
public void doStuff() {
...
}
}
then have a factory bean with the autowired list
#Component
public class MyServiceFactory {
private final List<MyService> services;
#Autowired
public MyServiceFactory(List<MyService> services) {
this.services = services;
}
}
To add more implementations of MyService, simply add them as #Component and Spring magically picks them up and adds them to the list.
Sometimes I find it useful to access my implementations via a Map
#Component
public class MyServiceFactory {
private final Map<String, MyService> services;
#Autowired
public MyServiceFactory(List<MyService> services) {
this.services = services
.stream()
.collect(toMap(MyService::getKey, Function.identity()));
}
public MyService getServiceByKey(String key) {
return services.get(key);
}
}
I find this keeps each implementation nice and self contained (and easy to test). Spring automatically picks up all the components that implement my interface without the factory having a huge number of imports. And I can test the factory easily by mocking the list of implementations.
I am using CDI 1.2 (Weld 2.3.5) and want to manually instantiate a bean and inject its dependencies during an AfterBeanDiscovery event listener. I'm expecting that this would allow me to ensure that its Initialization would precede the #PostConstruct initialization of other beans in the deployment container.
However, I am looking to use a bean declared via #Produces as a dependency for the bean I am trying to create. According to the BeanManager API doc, I am not allowed to call a BeanManager.getReference() method during the AfterBeanDiscovery event. So I find myself a little stuck; I'm not sure if/how I can retrieve/use a dependency declared in the container as a parameter when constructing my bean in my ABD listener.
So far, I have the following:
// Producer bean configuration
#Produces
#CustomConfigType
public CustomConfig auditConfig() {
CustomConfig config = new CustomConfig();
config.setConfigFile("config/myconfig.properties");
config.setDataSource(datasource);
config.setResourceAccessor(new ClassLoaderResourceAccessor(getClass().getClassLoader()));
return config;
}
// CDI Extension
public class CDIBootstrap implements Extension {
void afterBeanDiscovery(#Observes AfterBeanDiscovery abd, BeanManager bm) {
AnnotatedType<CDICustomConfig> at = bm.createAnnotatedType(CDICustomConfig.class);
// this clearly fails as I am not allowed to use forEach() and retrieve an instance of the CustomConfig as declared using the #Produces annotation. But my goal is to accomplish something like this
CDI.current().select(CustomConfig.class, new AnnotationLiteral<CustomConfigType>(){}).forEach(config -> {
Bean instance = new Bean<CDICustomConfig>() {
#Override
public Set<Type> getTypes() {
Set<Type> types = new HashSet<>();
types.add(CDICustomConfig.class);
types.add(Object.class);
return types;
}
#Override
public Class<? extends Annotation> getScope() {
return Dependent.class;
}
...
// Bolierplate methods
...
#Override
public Set<InjectionPoint> getInjectionPoints() {
return it.getInjectionPoints();
}
#Override
public CDICustomConfig create(CreationalContext<CDICustomConfig> ctx) {
// I would like to use the #Produces bean reference here in the instance constructor
CDICustomConfig instance = new CDICustomConfig(config, config.getDataSource(), config.getResourceAccessor());
it.inject(instance, ctx);
it.postConstruct(instance);
return instance;
}
#Override
public void destroy(CDICustomConfig instance, CreationalContext<CDICustomConfig> ctx) {
it.preDestroy(instance);
it.dispose(instance);
ctx.release();
}
};
abd.addBean(instance);
});
}
I'm still learning how to best leverage the JEE/CDI events and listeners, so perhaps this is not the right approach. Is there anyway to legally do what I am hoping to do? Is there any way to use/access a CDI controlled bean instance from within the ABD event listener?
I'm looking to support multiple #Produces CustomConfig beans, and generate a CDICustomConfig for each instance of a CustomConfig bean found in the context. How should I approach this?
I would like to use goolge/guice inject a value based on a class i provide with the annotation.
AutoConfig annotation
#BindingAnnotation
#Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
#Target({ ElementType.PARAMETER, ElementType.FIELD })
public #interface AutoConfig {
// default null not possible
Class<? extends Provider<? extends ConfigLoader<?>>> provider() default XMLAutoConfigProvider.class;
}
This is my annotation which allows configuring the type of config, that should be used for the annotated fields.
Usecase:
#AutoConfig()
ConfigLoader<?> defaultConfig;
#AutoConfig(provider = JsonConfigProvider)
ConfigLoader<?> jsonConfig;
I want to have two configs, one default/xml one and a json one. They will probably never occur in the same class at the same time. But i don't know when the one or the other is used. I used the approach with a class because they are provided by some dependencies/libs and this annotation will be used for some (plugable) submodules.
MyGuiceModule
public class MyGuiceModule extends AbstractModule {
#Override
protected void configure() {
bind(new TypeLiteral<ConfigLoader<?>>() {})
.annotatedWith(AutoConfig.class)
.toProvider(autoConfig.provider());
}
}
This the critical part, i just cannot imagine how to implement it.
So basically i just want to use the provider class specified in the annotation.
Its not necessary to use the provider class here too. Because autoConfig.provider().newInstance() is basically all i need. (I need to use a setter on the new instance but thats all i want to do at this place)
To sum it up all i really want to do is push the annotation (or its values to the provider) either using the get(AutoConfig autoConfig) or in the constructor.
Currently i only use the constructor to inject the configFile value i want to set on the newly generated config instance.
If you know that #AutoConfig(provider = JsonConfigProvider) ConfigLoader<?> jsonConfig is going to return you exactly the results of jsonConfigProvider.get(), and JsonConfigProvider obviously has a public parameterless constructor for newInstance to work, why wouldn't you just ask for a JsonConfigProvider in the first place?
Fundamentally Guice is just a Map<Key, Provider> with fancy wrapping. The bad news is that this makes variable bindings like "bind Foo<T> for all T" impossible to express concisely, and that includes your "bind #Annotation(T) Foo for all T". The good news is that you still have two options.
Bind each provider separately
Though you can't inspect annotations during provision (or tell Guice to do so for you), Guice will compare annotations using their equals methods if you bind an annotation instance rather than an annotation class (the way you would with Names.named("some-name")). This means that you can bind a ConfigLoader<?> with each expected annotation in a Module. Of course, this also means you'll have to have a list of possible ConfigLoader Providers available at configuration time, but they have to be compile-time constants anyway if you're using them as annotation parameters.
This solution works with constructor injection as well, but for fields you'll need both #Inject and #AutoConfig(...), and AutoConfig will need to keep its #BindingAnnotation meta-annotation.
To do this, you're going to have to write an implementation of your annotation, the way Guice does with NamedImpl. Note that the implementations of equals and hashCode must match the ones Java provides in java.lang.Annotation. Then it's just a matter of (redundantly) binding like this:
for(Class<ConfigLoader<?>> clazz : loaders) {
bind(ConfigLoader.class).annotatedWith(new AutoConfigImpl(clazz))
.toProvider(clazz);
}
The definition of equals is up to you, which means you can (and should) bind #AutoConfig(ConfigEnum.JSON) and keep the Guice bindings in your modules rather than specifying your requested implementation all over your codebase.
Use custom injections
You can also use custom injections to search your injected types for custom annotations like #AutoConfig. At this point, you'd be using Guice as a platform to interpret #AutoConfig instead of #Inject, which means that constructor injection won't work but that you can control your injection based on the injected instance, field name, field annotation, annotation parameters, or any combination thereof. If you choose this style, you can drop #BindingAnnotation from AutoConfig.
Use the example in the wiki article linked above as your template, but at minimum you'll need to:
Use bindListener on Binder or AbstractModule to match types that need this custom injection.
In the TypeListener you bind, search injected types for #AutoConfig-annotated fields, and if they have any matching methods then bind those matching methods to a MembersInjector or InjectionListener. You'll probably want to tease the class literal out of the annotation instance here, and pass in the Field and Class as constructor arguments to the MembersInjector/InjectionListener.
In the MembersInjector or InjectionListener you write, instantiate the provider and set the field to the instance the provider provides.
This is a very powerful feature, which would futher allow you to--for instance--automatically provide the configuration based on which instance you're injecting into or based on the name of the field. However, use it carefully and document it heavily, because it may be counter-intuitive to your coworkers that Guice is providing for an annotation other than #Inject. Also bear in mind that this won't work for constructor injection, so refactoring from field injection to constructor injection will cause Guice to complain that it's missing a required binding to instantiate the class.
I had a similar problem. I wanted to use a custom annotation that receives a enum param to choose the implementation. After a lot of research, debug and testing, I came to the following solution:
//enum to define authentication types
public enum AuthType {
Ldap, Saml
}
//custom annotation to be used in injection
#Target({ ElementType.FIELD, ElementType.PARAMETER, ElementType.METHOD })
#BindingAnnotation
public #interface Auth {
AuthType value();
}
//defintion of authenticator
public interface Authenticator {
public void doSomehting();
}
//Authenticator implementations
public class LdapAuthenticator implements Authenticator {
#Override
public void doSomehting() {
// doing ldap stuff
}
}
public class SamlAuthenticator implements Authenticator {
#Override
public void doSomehting() {
// doing saml stuff
}
}
public class MyModule extends AbstractModule {
// annotate fields to bind to implementations
private #Auth(AuthType.Ldap) Authenticator ldap;
private #Auth(AuthType.Saml) Authenticator saml;
#Override
protected void configure() {
//bind the implementation to the annotation from field
bindAnnotated("ldap", LdapAuthenticator.class);
bindAnnotated("saml", SamlAuthenticator.class);
}
private void bindAnnotated(String fieldName, Class<? extends Authenticator> implementation) {
try {
//get the annotation from fields, then bind it to implementation
Annotation ann = MyModule.class.getDeclaredField(fieldName).getAnnotation(Auth.class);
bind(Authenticator.class).annotatedWith(ann).to(implementation);
} catch (NoSuchFieldException | SecurityException e) {
throw new RuntimeException(e);
}
}
}
//usage: add #Auth(<AuthType>) to the dependency
public class ClientClass {
private Authenticator authenticator;
#Inject
public ClientClass(#Auth(AuthType.Ldap) Authenticator authenticator) {
this.authenticator = authenticator;
}
}
Check the documentation of Binder
I tested the Jeff Bowman solution, but it apparently works only binding to providers
As a BindingAnnotations#binding-annotations-with-attributes states equals() and hashCode() should be properly implemented. So given that there is MyAnnotation
#Qualifier
#Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
#Target({ElementType.FIELD, ElementType.PARAMETER})
public #interface MyAnnotation {
SomeEnum value() default SomeEnum.A;
}
which is used to specify SomeInterface implementation(SomeDefault and SomeOther), SomeModule class could look like
public class SomeModule extends AbstractModule {
#Override
protected void configure() {
bind(Key.get(SomeInterface.class, createAnnotationClass(A))).to(SomeDefault.class);
// more common binding expresion
bind(SomeInterface.class).annotatedWith(createAnnotationClass(B)).to(SomeDefault.class);
}
private Annotation createAnnotationClass(SomeEnum someEnum) {
return new MyAnnotation() {
#Override
public SomeEnum value() {
return someEnum;
}
#Override
public Class<? extends Annotation> annotationType() {
return MyAnnotation.class;
}
#Override
public boolean equals(Object o) {
if (this == o) return true;
if (o == null || getClass() != o.getClass()) return false;
MyAnnotationCl myAnnoCl = (MyAnnotationCl) o;
return A == myAnnoCl.getValue();
}
#Override
public int hashCode() {
// from java annotation documentation
return (127 * "value".hashCode()) ^ value().hashCode();
}
};
}
}
Then annotation could be used as follows:
public class DoSomethingWithSomething {
private final SomeInterface someImplementation;
#Inject
public DoSomethingWithSomething(
#MyAnnotation SomeInterface someDefault
// #MyAnnotation(A) SomeInterface someDefault
// #MyAnnotation(B) SomeInterface someOther
) {
this.someImplementation = someDefault;
}
}
Based on parameters passed to a method, I need to select from one of many Spring beans that are implementations of the same class, but configured with different parameters.
E.g. if user A invokes the method, I need to call dooFoo() on bean A, but if it's user B then I need to call the very same method, only on bean B.
Is there a 'Springier' way of doing this other than sticking all the beans in a map, and deriving a key from the parameters passed to my method?
We face that issue in our project, and we solve it through a Factory-Like class. The client class -the one that needed the bean at runtime- had an instance of the factory, that was injected through Spring:
#Component
public class ImTheClient{
#Autowired
private ImTheFactory factory;
public void doSomething(
Parameters parameters) throws Exception{
IWantThis theInstance = factory.getInstance(parameters);
}
}
So, the IWantThis instance depends on the runtime value of the parameters parameter. The Factory implementation goes like this:
#Component
public class ImTheFactoryImpl implements
ImTheFactory {
#Autowired
private IWantThisBadly anInstance;
#Autowired
private IAlsoWantThis anotherInstance;
#Override
public IWantThis getInstance(Parameters parameters) {
if (parameters.equals(Parameters.THIS)) {
return anInstance;
}
if (parameters.equals(Parameters.THAT)) {
return anotherInstance;
}
return null;
}
}
So, the factory instance holds reference to both of the posible values of the IWantThis class, being IWantThisBadly and IAlsoWantThis both implementations of IWantThis.
Seems like do you want a ServiceLocator using the application context as registry.
See ServiceLocatorFactoryBean support class for creating ServiceLocators mapping keys to bean names without coupling client code to Spring.
Other option is to use a naming convention or annotation based configuration.
for example, assuming that you annotate Services with #ExampleAnnotation("someId"), you can use something like the following Service Locator to retrieve them.
public class AnnotationServiceLocator implements ServiceLocator {
#Autowired
private ApplicationContext context;
private Map<String, Service> services;
public Service getService(String id) {
checkServices();
return services.get(id);
}
private void checkServices() {
if (services == null) {
services = new HashMap<String, Service>();
Map<String, Object> beans = context.getBeansWithAnnotation(ExampleAnnotation.class);
for (Object bean : beans.values()) {
ExampleAnnotation ann = bean.getClass().getAnnotation(ExampleAnnotation.class);
services.put(ann.value(), (Service) bean);
}
}
}
}
Sticking them in a map sounds fine. If it's a Spring-managed map (using util:map, or in Java config), that's better than creating it somewhere else, because then Spring owns all the object references and can manage their lifecycle properly.
If the beans (A, B) you are talking about are SessionScope its no problem at all, they will be selected correctly.
public class BusinessLogic {
private BaseClassOfBeanAandB bean;
public void methodCalledByUserAorB() {
bean.doFoo();
}
}
Jersey (and JAX-RS in general) allows simple dependency injection as follows:
#Path("/")
public class MyResource {
#Context private Application application;
...
}
Jersey first creates the class, then it binds dependencies to it. Is this a mechanism I can re-use for instances whose lifecycle I control entirely?
For example, consider an interface with some unknown implementations.
public interface MyInterface {
public boolean isHappy();
}
Suppose I have a list of these in one of my provider singletons, for example, an ExceptionMapper. It would be initialized in some subclass of Application.
#Provider
public class MyExceptionMapper implements ExceptionMapper<Exception> {
private List<MyInterface> list;
public ExceptionMapper(List<MyInterface> list) {
this.list = list;
}
#Override
public Response toResponse(Exception e) {
for (MyInterface item : list) {
// Manually bind dependencies here?
if (item.isHappy()) {
return Response.ok("Nope, no errors here. Promise.").build();
}
}
return Response.serverError().build();
}
}
And finally, suppose there's a specific implementation of this interface that needs access to the Application:
public class MyImplementation implements MyInterface {
#Context private Application application; // Can't do this
#Override
public boolean isHappy() {
MyApplication myApp = (MyApplication) application;
return myApp.shouldIgnoreExceptions(); // NullPointerException
}
}
Is there a way to bind contexts for all of the implementations of my interface? Or do I need to find a way to get Jersey to manage all implementations (by making them providers)? Or must I resort to CDI to perform dependency injection?
Note that I'm using Jersey 1.17.1, and I'd like to avoid defining any particular dependency as being part of the interface.
The JAX-RS way is to implement your own ContextResolver for MyInterface. Then you can manage the implementation of the contexts inside the context resolved. Context resolver is provider and is managed by Jersey, but not the MyInterface implementations.