Develop Reference

How can I see what Tomcat is doing with respect to Servlets and the network side

Currently, I am learning about Java web development.
A lot of it seems to simply be configuration to me, and I feel that my understanding is superficial because I only see the configuration (i.e. define your servlets and their mappings in the web.xml file, make custom Servlets by extending the HttpServlet class, instantiate Tomcat in the main method, etc.)
I want do know a bit more about what is actually going on under the hood - so I am in some need of some guidance.
To this end, I have done some cursory reading on Tomcat and servlets from the following links:
What is a servlet
Difference between embedded and not embedded
Tomcat docs
So what I think I understand from this is that the servlets sit inside the Tomcat instance (a servlet container) and Tomcat handles all of the receiving all of the requests of the client and relaying them to the servlets. The servlets process the requests, send back a response, which Tomcat then sends back to the client. I suppose in the local setup I have, my machine would both be acting as the client and server.
Given the above I want to know:
How I can directly see and monitor the client's sending the request to Tomcat and verify that Tomcat has received the request? Essentially, how can I verify that this networking side of things is happening due to some implementation by Tomcat?
How does Tomcat parse the request information and send it to the servlets?
Is Tomcat a servlet container or a web server? Are these the same thing?
In the answer given in the second link regarding embedded vs. non-embedded, the answer states that an embedded server looks like a regular java program. Does this mean that for an embedded server, the server is in the java application while the web application is inside the server in the non-embedded case? Like the containment relationship is reversed? What does containment mean in the first place here?
Apologies for the numerous questions and thank you for helping to clarify.

2. How does Tomcat parse the request information and send it to the servlets?
The Servlet specification explains that in detail. The spec is surprisingly easy to read; I suggest giving it a go.
As a simplified overview…
The job of a Servlet container is to process the incoming request, which is just a bunch of text. The Servlet container pulls out the various pieces and assembles them into a request object.
Likewise, the response produced by your servlet is packaged up as a response object. The Servlet container's job is to use all the info contained in that object to create a stream of text to be sent back to the client web browser.
The whole point of Servlet containers is to relieve the servlet-writing programmers of the need to know much of the details of HTTP and how to make a server. The Servlet container does all that work. In other words, the great thing about Servlet technology is that you the programmer need not ask this # 2 question of yours!
3. Is Tomcat a servlet container or a web server? Are these the same thing?
(a) both, (b) no.
No, servlet containers and web servers are two different kinds of software.
A web server handles:
listening for incoming connections from clients (web browsers, etc.)
sending response back to the client
A web server handles all the network traffic.
A Servlet container provides an environment in which relatively small chunks of code (servlets) can process a request and formulate a response. The small servlet does not have to handle network traffic, launching & shutting down, security, and all the other responsibilities of a full server. That explains the "-let" in "Servlet".
Your servlet you write plugs into a Servlet container. The container communicates with the web server, receiving each request passed by the web server, and passing to the web server the response produced by your servlet. When a request arrives, the container invokes your servlet.
Your servlet remains blissfully ignorant as to what particular Servlet container implementation is running, as long as it complies with the Jakarta Servlet specification. And your servlet remains blissfully ignorant as to the existence of web servers.
Some products, such as Tomcat & Jetty, can be composed of both a web server and a Servlet container.
Tomcat is composed mainly of three components: (1) Catalina, a servlet container, (2) Coyote, a web server, and (3) Jasper, a Jakarta Server Pages processor. See Wikipedia.
For most people's needs, the Coyote web server in Tomcat is a suitable web server. So you can use Tomcat as as all-in-one application server, handling both web traffic and servlets.
[web request] ➜ [Tomcat Coyote] ➜ [Tomcat Catalina] ➜ [your servlet]
Alternatively, some folks choose to use Tomcat only as a Servlet container, sitting behind a separate web server such as Apache HTTP Server. In such a case, Tomcat’s Coyote component goes unused. Instead, the separate web server handles client browser components, and processes incoming requests. If a request is asking for a static resource, the web server serves it out, without any involvement from Tomcat. If the request is asking for work that has been assigned to a servlet, then the separate web server passes the request on to Tomcat and its Catalina component. After your servlet produces a response, the response moves from Tomcat back to the external web server, which traffics the response onwards to the client web browser.
[web request] ➜ [Apache HTTP Server] ➜ [Tomcat Catalina] ➜ [your servlet]
4 … embedded vs. non-embedded …
Non-embedded is the classic situation, as originally envisioned when Servlet technology was first invented.
Back then, servers were few, expensive, and already in place permanently. The goal of Servlet technology was to make it easy for companies to keep those expensive servers busy by having many web applications running alongside each other.
Servlet technology allowed many different servlets to be running on one machine without stepping on each other, and without the programmers of each servlet having known anything about the other servlets being written. The Servlet container can stay up and running as servlets are deployed and un-deployed.
Fast forward, and we have cloud technology where servers are many, cheap, and convenient to create and destroy on-the-fly. So nowadays many people want to run their web applications separately, one web app per virtual machine or virtual service. Thus the need for embedded mode. We need an application that can be launched and shutdown on its own, to run one specific servlet (or multiple servlets meant to work together) without any other unrelated web apps.
One way to achieve this new goal is to package a web server and servlet container into a standalone Java app. A system administrator can launch and quit this standalone app like any other Java app, without knowing anything about how to configure an on-going web server and Servlet container.

Redirect All Request from web server to another

I have to make an application in tomcat which core responsibility is to redirect all request coming from browser application to API server. It works like proxy server between browser application and API application. Have to write it on tomcat. How can i achieve this, do i have write a REST API application on tomcat too?
Project Description
Requirement is like we have two application one is developed on React, its a web-portal and the other one is on spring-boot as a backend application (json apis).
spring-boot application is going to be deployed on secure zone and web-portal is in DMZ. web-portal in on internet, backend application is on intranet. As web-portal is a CSR application so the api's calls from web-portal contains backend application IP/URI but it cannot be accessible from internet.
So i am planning to write an application on DMZ zone and it will be deployed on apache tomcat, so like when request comes at tomcat it redirect it to backend application server which is on intranet with all headers/payload and redirect response from backend server to web-portal.

You want to set up a reverse proxy which is a standard pattern. Take a look at the answers at Reverse Proxy Java or just search the web for "reverse proxy java".
If you are not bound to implement it in java take a look at Nginx which we use in many projects to transfer the request from the web app to the REST backend.

How to properly deploy an Angular 2 app with a Java backend?

The scenario is this: I'm developing a Java EE application with an Angular 2 frontend. The client has an Apache server which is usually used to serve static resources and an Oracle Weblogic for the dynamic part. The problem is that by default the Angular 2 App and the Weblogic server will not be able to talk each other due to the Same Origin Policy.
So far I have 3 possible deployment approaches in mind:
Set up a Reverse Proxy in Apache to point the REST endpoints to Weblogic
Package the Angular App in a WAR/EAR and deploy it to Weblogic. So I would end up with something like: myserver/myapp for the UI and myserver/myapp-rest for the Backend.
Package the Angular App in the same WAR as the Java backend. So I would end up with myserver/myapp for the UI and myserver/myapp/api for the REST endpoints.
There is a 4th option which would be setting up CORS, but I'm worried about the security using that approach.
Which is the right approach?

If you are allowed to make infra decisions , change apache webserver to nginx , we switched to nginx and got lot of added values in terms of concurrent processing.
In our project the angular client is served by nginx webserver which talks to java backend hosted on tomcat 8.x(our app server) , also there are couple of tiers after app-server a separate DB server and an elastic search server.
Don't feel intimidated to set up CORS, you will eventually need to allow some origins requests which don't originate on your domain and port.
If your java tech stack has spring mvc , then setting up CORS is just a matter of adding few lines of configuration. You can even hardcode your angular url to allow backend server to serve requests only from your angular URL.
In normal JavaEE world, CORS is just another filter or interceptor where you can set response headers with all the allowed origins, http methods etc. It's very simple you can look it up.
For your given choices
seems plausible and a value addition that you get is you can
delegate SSL encryption to proxy server .
seems rather odd, you would want to separate the static content server from dynamic contents server, your angular js bundles, assets
etc are mostly static, if you keep your static server separate then
you can configure cookie-less domains down the line that would make
serving a lot faster.
3 same as 2.
I would strongly suggest the CORS option , from my past experiences.

Java EE Web Applications vs Web Services

Can someone confirm or clarify for me:
From what I can tell, Java EE web apps consist of a Servlet and/or JSP driven dynamic web page being fed back in the HTTP response, triggered by the Java EE server receiving a HTTP GET or POST request.
From what I can tell, Java EE web services also make use of Servlets as the web tier components, however a WS Servlet receives a SOAP message and validates the contents of those messages with whatever WSDL the Servlet is WARed with. The response is also packaged in SOAP and sent back to the requestor.
So, from what I can tell, both Java EE web apps and WSes use Servlets as the web components, with the only real difference being the protocol used (raw HTTP vs SOAP, which is an extension of HTTP).
This is the best I could come up with - am I right? Totally wrong? Close?

The biggest difference is not in how they are delivered, but in how they are used. Web applications are targeted to web browsers and usually serve full HTML-based applications . Web services, on the other hand, are purposed to serve raw data for another application to consume.

You are right, and servlets are just a means to connect the code at a given webapp context to a URI path. Whether the servlet is serving HTML or WS is inconsequential to the webapp container, it's just data with a MIME type being sent back.
You could also manage the same thing with a filter under Servlet 2.3 and later specifications. Spring does this, and has a very robust means of adding to the filter chain to support it.

Separating web server and app server, do both need java?

If we are to separate our web server and app server, would we need java on both machines? I've had one coworker say to install jboss on both machines (seems to defeat the purpose if both machines have app server installed) and another says just install jboss on one and apache on the other (app server/web server).
I have the web project setup already and it uses servlets and JSPs. The JSPs display the content while the servlets do the action. The servlets receive requests and forward responses to the JSP. My question is how do I do this if the web server only has apache and therefore displays static content? I understand how to forward the requests from the web server to the app server but what about maintaining session state, is that done on the web server and if so how would it be done?
If the login page is html and the content after the login is html then how could I stop people from accessing the content if they haven't logged in?

The latter setup you describe, with Apache serving static content and forwarding requests for JSP/servlets onto the app server is the standard setup.
Session state is maintained as normal, your Java webapp on the app server sends the user back a cookie containing a JSESSIONID and when the user makes subsequent requests, Apache includes all request info (including cookies) in what it forwards to the app server.
The setup becomes a bit more complicated if you want to have Apache sit in front of and load balance requests to multiple JBoss instances, but it's still pretty easy to set up with mod_proxy_balancer.
Some links that might help you:
http://help.shadocms.com/blog/2009/how-to-setup-apache-with-jboss-on-a-shado-site.cfm
http://redlumxn.blogspot.com/2008/01/configure-apache2-and-jboss-422ga.html

There are many possibilities.
On web machine install just apache with mod_jk to redirect the requests to tomcat/jboss.
In this case you don't need java on this machine.
You can also separate your jsp container (e.g. tomcat/jboss) and your app server in this case you you will need to install java where you have your web container.
Generally where there is a need of higher security people combine the above mentioned possibilities. Thin web layer (apache + no java) + Web container (e.g. tomcat) + app layer (jboss/glassfish)
The first solution is normally the standard one.

Your scenario reminds me of SiteMinder. It was used to access control into our application. It has built in HTTP forwarding so from the user's perspective the browser talks to siteminder and siteminder talks to the real application. They both use session cookies and siteminder's called SMSESSION while the app's called JSESSIONID so there is no conflict.

A common deployment is to use Apache fronting servers to serve static content and forwarding requests for dynamic content to the JSP server. This is mainly for performance reasons, Apache being both faster at serving content and reducing the load on the JSP server.
I don't see any reason why you couldn't, for example, use IIS as the fronting server (removing Java from the equation), although with the wealth Apache modules and accompanying information about the configuration I think you might be making life difficult for yourself if you did.

Short answer - No.
Long answer -
It depends on the needs of your application. There are a few reasons why you would want to have the web server on a different physical machine:
You want to have the web server serve
the static content, and leave the app
server free to only process
servlet/jsp content
You wish to implement software based
load balancing. You would have the
apache server proxy requests to
multiple backing app servers
In your login example, the html page is served by apache, and the action of the html form points to your servlet for processing - so JBoss/java will still manage the session. Keep in mind that any static content you want apache to server will need to be present on the web server.