I have a question regarding declaration of classes in applicationContext.xml
In applicationContext.xml do we need to specify all the classes from the application?
E.g.
In my small web application I have a Entity class, Service class and DAO class. So currently it is defined as
<!-- Beans Declaration -->
<bean id="Employees"
class="net.test.model.Employees" />
<!-- User Service Declaration -->
<bean id="
EmployeeService" class="net.test.employees.service.EmployeeService">
<property name="employeesDAO" ref="EmployeeDAOImpl" />
</bean>
<!-- User DAO Declaration -->
<bean id="EmployeeDAO" class="net.test.employee.dao.EmployeeDAOImpl">
<property name="sessionFactory" ref="SessionFactory" />
</bean>
So if I have multiple entity, service and dao classes do I need to mention all those classes in applicationContext.xml?
Any insight into this is highly appreciable.
Regards
Update 1
ManagedBean
#ManagedBean(name="empMB")
#Named
#Scope("request")
public class EmployeesManagedBean implements Serializable {
and I have Inject annotation
#Inject
EmployeesService employeesService;
In EmployeesService I have annotations like
#Named
public class EmployeesService implements IEmployeesService {
#Inject
EmployeesDAO employeesDAO;
#Override
public List<Employees> getEmployees() {
return getEmployeesDAO().getEmployees();
}
and finally in applicationContext.xml I have
<context:component-scan base-package="net.test" />
Now the problem is when I run my application I am getting
java.lang.NullPointerException at
net.test.managed.bean.EmployeesManagedBean.getEmpList(EmployeesManagedBean.java:53)
What am I doing wrongly to get nullpointer exception?
In applicationContext.xml do we need to specify all the classes from
the application?
No. Declaring model classes like your net.test.model.Employees is pointless unless you need a prototype to work with, something like initializing its values, but you can do this directly in the class and just instantiate it.
So if I have multiple entity, service and dao classes do I need to
mention all those classes in applicationContext.xml?
As I explained before, entity classes no. Services and DAOs are ok because most of the time you need DAOs injected to the Services (and that's the point of DI). But of course, if you create 3 DAOs and you want them to be injected in your 3 Services, then mention them in your Spring XML Bean Definition file (what you call applicationContext.xml).
But one thing, you may want to use package scanning autodetection and annotation based config to avoid writing everything in your Bean Definition File.
The bean declaration in the application context is to register the bean in the application container.
If the bean is not registered, the container wouldn't be able to dependency inject any instance of that class, or apply interceptors to the object of the class.
So unless the reference of bean is not required for any task like intercepting it or inject it, or create default singleton object of it, there is no need to declare it in the applicationContext.xml
Hope this helps.
Ideally yes, another way can be using Spring Annotations so that you don't to add multiple entries in xml.
Related
I am using Spring for loading localized resource bundles into my application. Here is what I have done.
<bean id="systemMessages" class="o.s.c.s.ResourceBundleMessageSource">
<property name="basename" value="locale/system">
</bean>
<bean id="clientMessages" class="o.s.c.s.ResourceBundleMessageSource">
<property name="basename" value="locale/client">
</bean>
I want to load messages based on the locale in my controller, and I tried both these ways below
#Autowired
#Qualifier("clientMessages")
ResourceBundleMessageSource clientMessages;
#Resource(name="systemMessages")
ResourceBundleMessageSource systemMessages;
EDIT
The application is a JAXRS application and the injection is being tried in a Global Exception Mapper. From the comments I now understand that this class would have been created by the JAXRS container and not Spring ( Code below). How to let Spring know that this injection must work?
import javax.ws.rs.WebApplicationException;
//other imports
public class GlobalWebApplicationException extends WebApplicationException{
private String systemMessage;
private String clientMessage;
//Autowire the multiple resourcebundles
public GlobalWebApplicationException (String key, Locale locale) {
// this is where I want to use the injected object fetch the property
}
public doSomething(){
// Business Logic
}
}
But the injection is not happening and I am getting an NPE. How do I achieve this?
When using Spring and having it do auto wiring using annotations the fields cannot be null. The dependencies need to be satisfied on startup of the application. If that doesn't happen there can be 1 of 2 things wrong
You haven't enabled annotation processing
You aren't using a spring managed bean but are creating instances yourself
For the first option add <context:annotation-config /> to your application context, or if you want to do component scanning add <context:component-scan /> the latter already implies annotation processing.
For the second option you need to make your bean a spring managed bean and use that instead of creating new instances yourself.
With Spring it is possible to inject a list of beans by the interface class like:
#Component
public class Service {
#Autowire
private List<InterfaceType> implementingBeans;
...
}
All defined beans that implement this interface will be present in this List.
The annotation based approach is not possible for me, as the Service class is in a module that must not have spring dependencies.
I need to use this mechanism from outside via xml configuration.
<bean id="service" class="...Service">
<property name="implementingBeans">
??? tell spring to create a list bean that resolves all beans of the interfaceType.
</property>
</bean>
Does anyone know how to solve this?
EDIT: Additionally, there are more than one spring applications that use this service. So the best solution would be to handle this szenario completely via xml configuration. I can then copy the xml parts to all spriong applications that need this.
I want to avoid having a kind of initializer bean that gets the service injected and must then be copied to all spring applications.
Kind regards.
An XML-only solution would simply have you declare a <bean> of the "external" type and provide an autowire value of "byType".
Controls whether bean properties are "autowired". This is an
automagical process in which bean references don't need to be coded
explicitly in the XML bean definition file, but rather the Spring
container works out dependencies.
[...]
"byType" Autowiring if there is exactly one bean of the property type in the container. If there is more than one, a fatal error is
raised, and you cannot use byType autowiring for that bean. If there
is none, nothing special happens.
The explanation is a little confusing in that we expect multiple InterfaceType beans, but the actual field is of type List and Spring will be able to dynamically instantiate one and add all the InterfaceType beans to it, then inject it.
Your XML would simply look like
<bean id="service" class="...Service" autowire="byType">
</bean>
My original suggested solution made use of SpEL.
In the module that does have Spring dependencies, create a DTO
#Component(value = "beanDTO")
public class BeanDTO {
#Autowire
private List<InterfaceType> implementingBeans;
public List<InterfaceType> getImplementingBeans() {
return implementingBeans;
}
}
and then use SpEL to retrieve the value of implementingBeans from the beanDTO bean.
<bean id="service" depends-on="beanDTO" class="...Service">
<property name="implementingBeans" value="{beanDTO.implementingBeans}" />
</bean>
Spring will create the BeanTDO bean, inject all the beans that are of type InterfaceType. It will then create the service bean and set its property from beanDTO's implementingBeans property.
Following comments on question:
In an effort to be more JSR 330 compliant, Spring has introduced support for Java EE's javax.inject package. You can now annotate your injection targets with #javax.inject.Inject instead of #Autowired. Similarly, you can use #Named instead of #Component. The documentation has more details.
I have a situation very similar to "Inject a file resource into Spring bean"
I have a controller that uses some .jasper compiled files and I am declaring them as such
//...
#Controller
public class InvoicingController {
private Resource quoteTemplate;
...//
And in my context configuration file
<bean id="invoicingController" class="x.x.InvoicingController">
<property name="quoteTemplate" value="/WEB-INF/jasper/Quote.jasper" />
...
I set a breakpoint on the setQuoteTemplate() function and it is being called and the Resource object is being set properly when I initialize the container. However when I actually hit the controller quoteTemplate is null.
I am under the understanding that Controllers are singletons and unless there is a gap in my understanding I am not sure why the values that are set during the container's initialization become null when I hit a url that the controller handles.
EDIT:
Thanks #Sotirios Delimanolis
I ended up declaring beans as such:
<bean id="quoteFile" class="java.io.File">
<constructor-arg value="resources/jasper/Quote.jasper" />
</bean>
<bean id="quoteTemplate" class="org.springframework.core.io.FileSystemResource">
<constructor-arg ref="quoteFile" />
</bean>
And then #Autowireing the dependencies as such
#Autowired #Qualifier("quoteTemplate") private Resource quoteTemplate;
#Qualifier is used because I have multiple Resource implementation classes declared as beans and this makes sure the correct one gets used.
You can't be using both the #Controller annotation and a <bean> declaration, unless you don't have a component-scan. You will end up with two bean definitions where the last one will overwrite the first one.
In this case, it seems like the component-scanned bean definition comes second and overwrites the bean you created with <bean>.
Choose which bean declaration method you want to use.
I need to wire external lib class to my bean,in order to use it as singleton.
.xml config:
<bean id="myBean" class="com.my.MyBean">
<property name="someLib" value="com.ExternalBean" />
</bean>
java bean:
#Service
public class MyBean {
#Autowired
private ExternalBean externalBean;
public void setExternalBean(ExternalBean externalBean) {
this.externalBean = externalBean;
}
Further I use wired variable externalBean in public method ,in order not to instantiate it in every method call.
Problem is it null.
Do I wire bean correctly?What is mistake.
You have to define the external class as a bean in order to make #Autowired work.
<bean id="externalBean" class="some.external.package.ExternalBean">
</bean>
<bean id="myBean" class="com.my.MyBean">
</bean>
Also, if you use #Autowired you don't need the setter for it.
loodakrawa is right. A second thing that can cause a problem is, that you have a xml bean declaration for myBean and additional annotated the bean with #Service. I guess this will cause trouble as soon as use enable component scan.
I think that the better ide ais to use context path scan:
<context:component-scan base-package="some.external.package">
</context:component-scan>
Make sure that all these classes are within the package. Then mark both classes with one of the Annotations (#Repository, #Service, #Component).
One of the benefits, no setter required.
P.S: If you re using scan base you don't need to declare class as bean, annotations are enough
Maybe, because of my wrong English, I couldn't understand the benefit of using #Autowired annotation.
According to the tutorial we can simplify the first(I.) case to second case(II.) by means of #Autowired.
My question is, what is the meaning of the #Autowired ? Because it doesnt tell any more, since without using #Autowired the compiler can figure out that "EmpDao emDao" and "EmpManager" are closely related according the declaration.
code cited from here
I.
<bean id="empDao" class="EmpDao" />
<bean id="empManager" class="EmpManager">
<property name="empDao" ref="empDao" />
</bean>
public class EmpManager {
private EmpDao empDao;
public EmpDao getEmpDao() {
return empDao;
}
public void setEmpDao(EmpDao empDao) {
this.empDao = empDao;
}
...
}
II.
<context:annotation-config />
<bean id="empManager" class="autowiredexample.EmpManager" />
<bean id="empDao" class="autowiredexample.EmpDao" />
import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired;
public class EmpManager {
#Autowired
private EmpDao empDao;
}
#Autowired is spring-specific. #Inject is the standard equivallent. It is an annotation that tells the context (spring, or in the case of #Inject - any DI framework) to try to set an object into that field.
The compiler has nothing to do with this - it is the DI framework (spring) that instantiates your objects at runtime, and then sets their dependencies at the points you have specified - either via XML or via an annotation.
I agree it is a possible scenario for a DI framework to try to inject dependencies into all fields, even if they are not annotated. (And if you want to exclude a particular field, to annotate it). But they chose the other strategy (configuration-over-convention). By the way:
if using xml config and choose some form of autowiring, the dependencies of the bean will be automatically autowired without the need to specify anything
you can specify per-context autowiring settings.
When the server bootstraps itself. It finds
<context:annotation-config />
in the application context and then goes through the classes defined in the contexts. If there are any beans that are autowired, it injects that into the class by referring the context file.
Basically, it promotes convention over configuration. That's what most frameworks do these days to reduce the development time.
the #Autowired Spring annotation tells Spring to for a bean named 'empDao' and inject it into the EmpManager class, without you having to add the empDao bean as a property in your spring config file.
#Autowired tells Spring to find a bean of the declared type and wire in that bean, rather than requiring an explicit lookup by bean name. It can, under certain circumstances, make configuring applications easier if you only have one implementation of your types in a given Spring context.