I'm working to develop a multi-tenant Play Framework 2.1 application. I intend to override the onRequest method of the GlobalSettings class to load and set a custom configuration based on the subdomain of the request. Problem is, I don't see how this would be possible in Play 2.x.
I can override system properties at the command line when starting the server, but how can I do this programmatically in Java code for each request?
The code would look something like this (I assume):
#Override
public play.mvc.Action onRequest(Request request, Method actionMethod) {
//Look up configuration settings in Cache based on request subdomain
//(i.e. Cache.get("subdomain.conf"))
//if not in cache:
//load appropriate configuration file for this subdomain (java.io.File)
//set new configuration from file for this request
//cache the configuration for future use in a new thread
//else
//set configuration from cache for this request
return super.onRequest(request, actionMethod);
}
}
Looking up the URL and getting/setting the cache is easy, but I cannot figure out how to SET a new configuration programmatically for Play Framework 2.1 and the documentation is a little light on things like this.
Any thoughts? Anyone know a better, more efficient way to do this?
So, in a sort of roundabout way, I created the basis for a multi-tenant Play application using a Scala Global. There may be a more efficient way to implement this using a filter, but I'm finding this seems to work so far. This does not appear to be as easily implemented in Java.
Instead of using the configuration file, I'm using the database. I assume it would be far more efficient to use a key-value cache, but this seems to work for now.
In Global.scala:
object Global extends GlobalSettings {
override def onRouteRequest(request: RequestHeader): Option[Handler] = {
if (request.session.get("site").isEmpty){
val id = models.Site.getSiteIDFromURL(request.host)
request.session.+("site" -> id)
}
super.onRouteRequest(request)
}
}
And then, obviously, you have to create a database model to query the site based on the request domain and/or the session value set in the request. If anyone knows a better way I'd love to hear it.
Related
I have a spring boot application with the following context path:
server.servlet.context-path:/api
I need to write a rest controller that's mapped to
http://localhost:8080/logout
instead of http://localhost:8080/api/logout
Is there a way to achieve this? changing the "server.servelt.context-path" value is not an option.
this is what I tried and didn't work:
#GetMapping(value="../signout"){
public void logout(){
}
Nero, you say you can't change the "server.servlet.context-path" value. I bet you say this because you don't want to break the API, but I think you can manage to change this without breaking the API. Set the context-path to blank, which is permitted. Then in your application change the "api" mapping, which I assume is currently "/", to "api".
Change server.servlet.context-path:/api to server.servlet.context-path:/ or maybe server.servlet.context-path: (no slash). (Supposedly this is the default so you might just remove this entry altogether.)
Somewhere in your application change #RequestMapping("/") to #RequestMapping("/api").
Now you can also have #GetMapping(value="/signout") and you will have resources at http://localhost:8080/logout and http://localhost:8080/api.
I don't know what mapping annotations you happen to be using, but hopefully this is clear enough.
It may not be possible within that application to go outside its context root. Maybe you can create a separate Rest service app for that particular url and take it from there.
I'm using Spring boot with Ehcache for caching some data in the application.
The application is a rest service that caches some data that has high usage.
The code in our controllers looks like:
#Cacheable("CategoryModels")
#GetMapping("/category/{companyId}")
public List<CategoryViewModel> getAllCategories(#PathVariable(value = "companyId", required = true) long companyId,
#RequestHeader("user") String user) {
//custom code here
}
Now in some situations the users are getting different data sets back from the server. Can someone explain this in the above situation?
If data is changed in the database I refresh the cache and the program will auto update the updated data to the
For refreshing the cache I use a custom written method:
Cache categoryCache = (Cache) manager.getCache("CategoryModels").getNativeCache();
categoryCache.removeAll();
categoryController.getAllCategories(company.getCompanyId(), null);
I have the same behavior on other caches that are used and refreshed on the same way the above cache is used.
You should try to parametrize your cache definition with :
#Cacheable(value="CategoryModels", key="{ #root.methodName, #companyId, #user.id }")
It may be a couple of things. First off the default key resolver that spring provides does not consider anything but the names of the parameters. The cleanest way to fix this kid to write your own key revolver that considers both class and method, without this it could be possible to get back data from a completely different method that happens to share the same parameter list.
When developing a Web Application in Java, launching in Tomcat, I need to be able to create (dynamically) a new static address (link,URL) in the server that will be used to view the information of a new item, let's call it new_item_001, which have been just created by one user.
Say I want to create a new address
www.domain.com/webapp/items/new_item_001
which can be used to render a view of the contents of new_item_001.
Which is the best approach to do this?
Should I dynamically create a new servlet class for this view?
Should I dynamically create the folder items and one html file new_item_001 for this item inside of it?
Should I edit the server address mapping rules to create this static address and map it to a central servlet which somehow knows which item to display?
I understand the question is ill posed, and that I am far from even understanding the issue, so I would like some guidelines on what to look for.
None of the above.
You should simply have a servlet mapped to /items/*. When a request come to this servlet, analyze the actual path of the request, extract the part after /items/ to know the actual value (new_item_001) in your example, get the data corresponding to this item from the database, and send it to the browser.
Using a true MVC framework like Spring MVC would make that much easier. You could simply map a method of a controller using
#RequestMapping("/items/{itemId}")
public Item getItem(#PathVariable("itemId") String itemId) {
...
}
and let the framework do all the URL parsing for you.
I would like to tackle this in a simple way. Creating a servlet for each created item would be overkill and become quite cumbersome to manage after a successful run of the application for some time.
Changing/editing server mapping URL looks very naive approach and is not scaling too. Let configuration be there and change them only when you actually need to change them.
My suggestion is to create one servlet that handles all these requests. For example, you may save item information on a datastore or on file system(i.e images uploaded by user etc..). Next time a GET request is received by the application to fetch saved information of an item, servlet should be able to reference the item on database associated with the item id on the URL. If you don't wish to expose item id/surrogate key in the database, you can also have a simple mapping between them by implementing your own logic. Frameworks like Spring MVC do a good job in mapping URLs to resources like this should you wish to use a framework.
Additionally to minimize the number of requests to the same item, you can also implement an HTTP caching strategy(i.e. ETAG, If-Modified-Since) by instructing your web server at the time of first GET request from a user.
Well, this is from a developer newly using Play. When it came to using session, I found its not at all like I have been doing in servlets or jsps.
I have tried reading documentation and found session in Play are stored in HTTP cookies rather. I have tried importing HTTP class of play.
My problem however is I am unable to initialise a new session to set values in it.
I have obviously tried using 'new' session as in Java and that obviosly didnt work out.
Session session = new session();
Also after looking somewhere I have used:
Session session = Http.Context.current().session();
which shows me error in identifying context and current
I have tried looking at sample codes and codes on net. each of them however is different and I don't get the basic way of using sessions in Play, so that after that I can use put and get to keep and retrieve.
I know the question seems too basic but believe me there is no exact answer available anywhere to what I need. So please help me regarding this.
Any answer, any piece of code, or any Link on this will be highly appreciated.
Forget everything about the sessions from the jsp and servlets world while working with the Play's session. Play doesn't store anything on the server side and by design it's completely stateless. The Play session is just a cookie attached to every http request and it's stored on the client side. Word 'session' may be misleading in your case.
Working with the session is pretty straight forward. All you need is inherited from play.mvc.Controller which you have to extend when creating your own controller. To put a value in it you simply call the session(String key, String value) method from within a controller. For example:
public class Application extends Controller {
public static Result login() {
session("key", "example value");
return ok("Welcome!");
}
}
If there is no session cookie stored on client side this method will create new one and attach it to the HTTP response. Otherwise it will modify the existing one.
To read stored value use:
String value = session("key");
You can also remove value from the session:
session().remove("key");
or completely destroy it:
session().clear();
These are helper methods to work with the particular cookie witch in Play's terminology is called session. Nothing stops you from creating another cookie with similar purpose. But it'll require more writing. These helper methods saves your time and in many cases are more than enough.
You can specify session cookie name in your application.conf by setting session.cookieName property.
In play 2.8 the Http.Context was deprecated. This means, among other things, that the method "session()" is no longer available in a controller.
This is the updated way of doing it:
public Result info(Http.Request request) {
//This is the equivalent to the old session()
request.session() ...
}
The Http.Request needs to be passed down through the route defined in routes. More information here.
With Spring MVC, I know how you set the RequestMapping in every controller and method/action.
But what if I wanted this to be configurable, so for example I the following controllers:
BlogController
- with methods for listing blogs entries, single entry, new, update, etc.
ArticleController
- with methods for listing articles entries, single entry, new, update, etc.
Now in my application, the administrator can setup 2 blogs for the webiste, and 1 article section so the urls would be like:
www.example.com/article_section1/ - uses ArticleController
www.example.com/blog1/ - uses BlogController
www.example.com/blog2/ - uses BlogController
Maybe after a while the administrator wants another article section, so they just configure that with a new section like:
www.example.com/article_section2/
This has to work dynamically/on-the-fly without having to restart the application of course.
My question is only concerned with how I will handle url mappings to my controllers.
How would this be possible with Spring MVC?
I only know how to map urls to controllers using #RequestMapping("/helloWorld") at the controller or method level, but this makes the url mappings fixed and not configurable like how I want it.
Update:
I will be storing the paths in the database, and with the mapping to the type of controller so like:
path controller
/article_section1/ article
/blog1/ blog
/blog2/ blog
..
With the above information, how could I dispatch the request to the correct controller?
Again, not looking to reload/redeploy, and I realize this will require more work but its in the spec :)
Would this sort of URL mapping work for you?
www.example.com/blog/1/
www.example.com/blog/2/
If yes, then that's easy: Spring 3 supports path variables: http://static.springsource.org/spring/docs/3.0.x/reference/mvc.html#mvc-ann-requestmapping-advanced
Alternatively, you can create a generic request mapping and your own sub-dispatcher that reads a config file, but I think that's probably more work than it's worth.
Truly changing the request mappings at runtime might be hard (and not really recommended, since small errors can easily occur). If you still wish to do it, perhaps JRebel, and more specificly LiveRebel can be interesting for live redeployment of code and configuration.
Otherwise, like other posts suggested, RequestMappings supports wildcards, the limits of this should be clear after a quick read of the official documentation.
Try using with #RequestMapping wild cards as below:
#RequestMapping(value="/article_section*/"}
public void getArticle(....){
//TODO implementation
}
#RequestMapping(value="/blog*/"}
public void getBlog(....){
//TODO implementation
}
Hope this helps!!!
Also another solution might be to create a custom annotation that holds the already defined path on the #RequestMapping and also the new one to apply, let's say #ApiRestController.
Then, before the Spring context loads, the #Controller classes can be changed to have their annotation values changed at runtime by the new one (with the desired path). By doing this, Spring will load the enhanced request mapping and not the default one.
Created a small project to exemplify this for someone that needs this in the future https://gitlab.com/jdiasamaro/spring-api-rest-controllers.
Hope it helps.
Cheers.
doesn't this work?
#RequestMapping("/helloWorld*")