I'm having problem to assign json data into java class.Please do help anyone,
My java class is like,
public class ListofGridRecords<T> {
public int Totalrecords;
public List<T> GridRecords;//using TraderTransaction class.
}
and TraderTransaction class is,
public class TraderTransaction {
public Date AddedTime;
public String TransactId;
public TransactStatus Status;
public String OtherPartyAccountNo;
public Double AmountPaid;
public Double AmountRecieved;
public Double ClosingBalance;
public TransactionTypes TransType;
public String Narration;
public TraderTransaction() {
super();
}
}
and my json conversion function look like,
JsonObject returndata = JsonObject.parse(responseString);
String operationresult = returndata.get("OperationResult").toString();
if (Result.values()[Integer.parseInt(operationresult)] == Result.Success) {
Gson gson = new Gson();
#SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
ListofGridRecords<TraderTransaction> traderlist =
gson.fromJson(returndata.get("ResultData").toString(), ListofGridRecords.class);
Log.i("LIST DATA:", "" + traderlist);
for (TraderTransaction trader: traderlist.GridRecords) {
HashMap<String, String> map = new HashMap<String, String>();
map.put(TRANS_FIRST_COLUMN, currentformatter.format(trader.AddedTime));
map.put(TRANS_SECOND_COLUMN, trader.TransactId);
map.put(TRANS_THIRD_COLUMN, trader.OtherPartyAccountNo);
map.put(TRANS_FOURTH_COLUMN, trader.AmountPaid.toString());
map.put(TRANS_FIFTH_COLUMN, trader.AmountRecieved.toString());
map.put(TRANS_SIXTH_COLUMN, OpenOrClosed.values()[Integer.parseInt(trader.TransType.toString())].toString());
list.add(map);
}
}
I'm getting conversion error at for (TraderTransaction trader : traderlist.GridRecords).
My Json data look like,
{
"Messages":"RESULTS_RETRIEVAL_SUCCESSFULL",
"OperationResult":0,
"ResultData":{
"GridRecords":[
{
"AddedBy":"Distributor-9787457361-Rathinavel",
"AddedTime":"2013-04-12T16:26:24.0140117",
"AmountPaid":0.0,
"AmountRecieved":10000.0,
"ClosingBalance":10000.0,
"Narration":null,
"OtherPartyAccountNo":"0102849015327675",
"Status":2,
"TransType":2,
"TransactId":"TDRF483679051236"
},
{
"AddedBy":"Distributor-9787457361-Rathinavel",
"AddedTime":"2013-04-12T16:20:54.8681857",
"AmountPaid":0.0,
"AmountRecieved":0.0,
"ClosingBalance":0.0,
"Narration":null,
"OtherPartyAccountNo":"0102849015327675",
"Status":0,
"TransType":2,
"TransactId":"TDRF706925413802"
}
],
"Totalrecords":2
},
"UpdateAvailable":"0"
}
In order to parse your JSON, I'd use a slightly different strategy. As you seem to be interested in parsing only the "ResultData", I'd create classes to wrap the response, very similar to those you have already created, namely:
public class Response {
#SerializedName("ResultData")
public ResultData resultData;
}
and,
public class ResultData {
#SerializedName("GridRecords")
public List<GridRecord> gridRecords;
#SerializedName("Totalrecords")
public int totalrecords;
}
and,
public class GridRecord {
#SerializedName("AddedTime")
public String addedTime;
#SerializedName("TransactId")
public String transactId;
//other fields...
}
and other classes if necessary...
Then, in order to parse your JSON reponse, you just have to do:
Gson gson = new Gson();
Response data = gson.fromJson(responseString, Response.class);
and you'll be able to access any field, for example:
data.resultData.gridRecords.transactId;
Note 1: If you are interested in more fields of the JSON response, you just have to add more fields to your wrap classes, according to the JSON response...
Note 2: I've changed the type of addedTime to String, instead of Date because it throws an exception for unparseable date. Anyway I usually leave the types in the Response objects as simple String and then in the class from where I retrieve the response, I do the correct formatting while creating my objects, for example, when you put the values in your Map...
Note 3: The use of the annotation #SerializedName is interesting to separate the name of a field in the JSON response and in your app, in order to follow Java naming conventions, which your attributes are not following...
Note 4: You shouldn't use public attributes in your classes. It's more recommendable to use private/protected attributes and their correspondent getters and setters...
Related
i have the following method
public static <E> APIGatewayProxyResponseEvent generateResponse(E request, E response, int statusCode){
JSONObject result = new JSONObject();
result.put(Constants.REQUEST, request);
result.put(Constants.RESPONSE, response);
return new APIGatewayProxyResponseEvent()
.withBody(result.toString())
.withStatusCode(statusCode)
.withHeaders(Constants.commonHeaders);
}
i am getting net.sf.json.JSONException: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException when result.put(Constants.RESPONSE, response); is executed
response is
Also the corresponding class is:
public class PhysicalMediaURL extends MediaURL {
private static final String IDENTIFIER_PREFIX = "images/I/";
public PhysicalMediaURL(String physicalId, String extension, MediaHostnameProvider mediaHostnameProvider) {
super("images/I/" + physicalId, extension, mediaHostnameProvider);
}
}
public abstract class MediaURL implements URL {
private final String identifier;
private final String extension;
private final MediaHostnameProvider mediaHostnameProvider;
public MediaURL(String identifier, String extension, MediaHostnameProvider mediaHostnameProvider) {
this.identifier = identifier;
this.extension = extension;
this.mediaHostnameProvider = mediaHostnameProvider;
}
public String getIdentifier() {
return this.identifier;
}
public String getExtension() {
return this.extension;
}
public String getDomainName() {
return this.mediaHostnameProvider.getMediaHostname(this.getExtension());
}
public String getURL() {
StringBuilder urlBuilder = new StringBuilder();
urlBuilder.append("https://");
urlBuilder.append(this.getDomainName());
urlBuilder.append('/');
urlBuilder.append(this.getIdentifier());
urlBuilder.append('.');
urlBuilder.append(this.getExtension());
return urlBuilder.toString();
}
public List<String> getStyleTags() {
return null;
}
}
where PhysicalMediaURL is of type: URL and that is an interface
public interface URL {
String getIdentifier();
String getDomainName();
String getExtension();
List<String> getStyleTags();
String getURL();
}
I am a bit stuck in this.. need help.
First off it looks like you are using a JSON implementation that is not updated as regularly as the other ones(Your exception is from net.sf.json). I always recommend using the org.json implementation as it receives regular updates and bugfixes.
Most implementations of JSONObject, when used in this form, use bean based reflection to retrieve values from your object. This is not always what you want when your object is in an inheritance hierarchy because, depending on the object and the JSONObject impl, it will pull fields from the implementation that are not on your higher level type(URL in this case).
If you really want a generic serialization function use something like Jackson or Gson that will allow you to specify the type as a part of the serialization. Otherwise consider transforming your objects, before they are passed to your generateResponse function, into simpler objects such as a Map<String, String> that can serialize unambiguously.
As a final thought JSONObject's generic serialization works, but, its performance is likely to be worse than using a dedicated higher level serializer like Jackson. It's best used with the explicit put methods to generate simple objects.
I have a problem with deserialization list of different objects. Help me please to resolve this issue. This JSON is required by the customer side.
{"result":[
{
"id": 5,
"op":[
0,
{ "description": "hello world" }
]}]
}
I have:
public class Transaction {
public int id;
public List<Object> op;
}
public class ResponseTransactions {
public List<Transaction> result;
}
Gson gson = new Gson();
List< List<Transaction>> list= gson.fromJson(json,
ResponseTransactions.class))
After that I must call LinkedTreeMap:
String description = (LinkedTreeMap)Transaction.op.get(1).get("description");
But I want to use like this:
public class Operation{
public String description;
}
public class Transaction {
public String id;
public List<Operation> op;
}
I am not sure why you would have a dissimilar collection of objects cast into a list of concrete objects , but if thats what is required, you might want to look at a custom Deserializer. Here's a very informative link on how to create a custom deserializer for gson lib.
https://futurestud.io/tutorials/gson-advanced-custom-deserialization-basics
In your deserializer, you'll need to skip any JsonElement which is not of type "Operation"
I have some nested classes in Java, simplified here. Getters and setters exist.
Example
public class Planet {
#JsonProperty("name")
private String name;
#JsonProperty("moons")
private List<Moon> moons;
}
public class Moon {
#JsonProperty("moonname")
private String name;
#JsonProperty("craters")
private int craters;
}
I want to be able to deserialize the records on mongo (following this same structure) to java objects on the rest controller, specifically the HTTP GET request.
#RestController
#RequestMapping("/planets")
public class PlanetController {
#Autowired
private PlanetService planetService;
#RequestMapping("/")
public List<Planet> getAllPlanets() {
//Need to deserialize here
return planetService.getAll();
}
#RequestMapping("/{name}")
public Planet getItemsWithName(#PathVariable("name") String name) {
//deserialize here
return planetService.getEntryWithName(name.toLowerCase());
}
PlanetService.getAll() is expecting return type of List. getEntryWithName() is expecting return type of Planet.
How can I loop the results in the getAll() so I can deserialize them before they are returned?
Using Jackson's object mapper, I can do the serialization of a Java object to a JSON object.
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
try {
mapper.writeValue(new File("target/mars.json"), mars);
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
I can probably use readValue for the opposite process but I don't know how to loop the results.
I will appreciate the help. Let me know if something is not clear.
public List<Planet> getAllPlanets() {
List<Planet> planets = planetService.getAll();
String jsonString = new ObjectMapper().writeValueAsString(planets);
return planets;
}
I am trying to convert the following JSON structure (part of a larger JSON object) to a POJO but getting the exception copied below (using Java/Jackson).
JSON
"outputKeys":
{"ABC":"gGyIioUr4Jfr5QiCm6Z==",
"DEF":"RxHfNyD2JyPOpG5tv3Jaj5g=="}
Java class
private class OutputKeys {
private String key;
private String value;
public OutputKeys(String key, String value) {
this.key = key;
this.value = value;
}
}
&
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
mapper.readValue(jsonString, Test.class);
exception:
no suitable constructor found, can not deserialize from Object value (missing default constructor or creator, or perhaps need to add/enable type information?
Test class has the OutputKeys as an attribute.
Any suggestions would be welcome. I have tried using a List of OutputKeys as well .
Update:
I have tried the following without success:
class OutputKeys {
public Map<String, String> keys;
///with constructor/setter/getters
}
&
class OutputKeys {
public List<OutputKey> keys;
///with constructor/setter/getters
public class OutputKey {
Map<String, String> outputs = new HashMap<>();
// tried this too:
// String key
//String value
}
You require below mentioned single class only, containing
All keys(ABC and DEF)
getters/setters
toString() which you'll use interact with JSON.
public class OutputKeys
{
private String ABC;
private String DEF;
public String getABC ()
{
return ABC;
}
public void setABC (String ABC)
{
this.ABC = ABC;
}
public String getDEF ()
{
return DEF;
}
public void setDEF (String DEF)
{
this.DEF = DEF;
}
#Override
public String toString()
{
return "ClassPojo [ABC = "+ABC+", DEF = "+DEF+"]";
}
}
Let me know if you require more details.
Since the keys were dynamic, I ended up deserializing the data using the iterator on the JsonNode:
jsonNode.get("outputKeys").iterator()
& then getting the relevant dynamic key information via the iterator.
I needed a similar tool for NodeJS. So that I can write tests on parts of a bigger model that was serialized (JSON).
So, if I need only "ABC":"gGyIioUr4Jfr5QiCm6Z==" or "XYZ":{"Hello": "My String", "Content": [1,2,3]}, the only property I care to test at the moment is:
var sutXYX = { Hello: "My String", Content: [ 1, 2, 2]};
I wrote this tool as a utility https://github.com/whindes/PojoScriptifyFromJSON
In my Android app I have json, which looks like :
{
"Records": [
{
"RowIndex": "0",
"NameValue": {
"Name": "PropertyName1",
"Value": "PropertyValue1"
}
}{
"RowIndex": "1",
"NameValue": {
"Name": "PropertyName2",
"Value": "PropertyValue2"
}
}
]
}
I need to parce this json to object, which looks like:
public class MyClass {
public String PropertyName1;
public String PropertyName2;
}
And result after parsing should be:
public String PropertyName1 = "PropertyValue1";
public String PropertyName2 = "PropertyValue2";
Basically, the first json is equivalent of:
{
"PropertyName1" : "PropertyValue1",
"PropertyName2" : "PropertyValue2"
}
Question: How can I parce first json without usage swith/case to search for the necessary Property?
You'll have to go down the dark path of reflection I'm afraid.
you can parse the json into an intermediary object which has a map for namevalue.
then you use the below code (ofcourse just copy paste the bits you need) to loop over the map of key/value pairs. for each key look up the field you want, and set it. If you're guaranteed only to need to set public variables then you can use getFields and can skip the setAccessible.
public class Test {
public static void main(String[] argv) {
MyClass myClass = new MyClass();
Class<?> classObject = myClass.getClass();
// Field fields[] = classObject.getFields(); // if you want to get only public fields.
Field fields[] = classObject.getDeclaredFields(); // any field
for(Field f : fields) {
System.out.println(f.getName());
try {
// if member is private: security managers may object but the default java allows it
f.setAccessible(true);
f.set(myClass, "abc");
} catch (IllegalAccessException e) {
// handle access exception:
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
System.out.println("prop 1: " + myClass.PropertyName1);
System.out.println("prop 2: " + myClass.PropertyName2);
}
public static class MyClass {
public String PropertyName1;
private String PropertyName2;
}
}
Actually.. there is a non-reflect way but that will replace your implementation of the object you have.
If you change your class:
public class MyClass {
public String PropertyName1;
public String PropertyName2;
}
to
public class MyClass {
private Map<String, String> properties = new HashMap<String, String>();
public void setProperties(Map<String, String> props) { this.properties = props; }
public String getPropertyName1() {
return lookupProperty("PropertyName1");
}
public String getPropertyName2() {
return lookupProperty("PropertyName2");
}
private String lookupProperty(String property) {
if (properties.containsKey(property) {
return properties.get(property);
} else {
return null;
}
}
}
then you could parse the name value map into a map, and construct a myclass with it.
just listing it for completeness, though changing your domain model to fit a json input is not ideal.
I would recommend either way to do the input parsing, and then copy over the model into your actual domain object rather than using the json-model in your application. that way if the json model ever changes, your domain model will not change.
One method I can think of (which doesn't sound too great) is to actually make an object that matches the JSON response you get back. Then, map THAT NameValue object to MyClass
So, something like
public class NameValue {
public string Name;
public String Value;
public MyClass getMyClass(){
MyClass myClass = new MyClass();
myClass.PropertyName2 = Value;
return myClass;
}
}
You can come up with a better way to map it, obviously. But this is just an example of something I might do if I was given a response JSON I didn't particularly care for. You can similarly reverse it (have MyClass be able to create a NameValue object) so you can send data back in the correct format.