Develop Reference

Invoke SET method in Java by given a String

I have a string variable which dependes on "i" variable, i want to call this string, like his method:
String nameSetClassifiedMethod= "setClassficationdesc" + i;
and i wanted something like this:
this.nameSetClassifiedMethod( some parametersIn);
I know this is not possible, because i can't invoke a method with a string like im doing, but i don't know any solutions for this.
I have some code that's whic is not mine, which is doing something like:
if (i == 0) {this.setClassficationdesc0(..)}
if (i == 1) {this.setClassficationdesc1(..)}
if (i == 2) {this.setClassficationdesc2(..)}
So i'm trying to invoke the method by string to reduce complexity

Well you could call the method from a string variable using reflection. But instead, I suggest the following workflow:
String i = "One";
switch (i) {
case "One":
// call setClassficationdescOne(...)
break;
case "Two":
// call setClassficationdescTwo(...)
break;
// ...
}

It is possible. Please search and read the topic "Reflection in Java". In particular look at class Class and in it look at method getMethod. so you can do:
Method method = this.getClass().getMethod(...);
Once you get the method you can invoke it. (See Javadoc for class Method)

In that case you would use reflection by doing something like the following:
String nameSetClassifiedMethod= "setClassficationdesc" + i;
Method method = Operations.class.getDeclaredMethod("nameSetClassifiedMethod", String.class); //here you should adapt it to your method's signature
method.setAccessible(true);
// and then
ClassWhichHoldsReflectedMethod instance = new ClassWhichHoldsReflectedMethod();
method.invoke(instance, params...);
Check this out for more.

If you have a limited number of setClassificationdesc#() methods and you know them upfront, try something like this:
public class YourClass
{
#FunctionalInterface
private interface ClassificationdescSetter
{
public void set( … );
}
private final ClassificationdescSetter [] m_CDSetters;
public YourClass( … )
{
…
m_CDSetters = new ClassificationdescSetters [] {this::setClassificationdesc1, this::setClassificationdesc2, this::setClassificationdesc3, … };
…
}
public final void doSomething( final int i )
{
m_CDSetters [i - 1].set( … );
}
}
Of course, all error handling is missing here!
The interface is obsolete (at least redundant) if the signature for setClassificationdesc#() matches an already existing functional interface. In that case, use the existing interface as the type for m_CDSetters; you may have to use another method as set(), too.

You could use method handles.
import java.lang.invoke.MethodHandle;
import java.lang.invoke.MethodHandles;
import java.lang.invoke.MethodType;
public class MthdHndl {
public static void main(String[] args) {
MethodHandles.Lookup lookup = MethodHandles.lookup();
int index = 0;
String name = "setClassficationdesc";
MethodType type = MethodType.methodType(String.class, int.class);
try {
MethodHandle mh = lookup.findVirtual(George.class, name + index, type);
int parameter = 2;
String result = (String) mh.invoke(new George(), parameter);
System.out.println(result);
}
catch (Throwable x) {
x.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
class George {
private static final String[] FORTUNE = new String[]{"Long live the revolution!",
"Have a nice day.",
"Behind every argument is someone's ignorance."};
public String setClassficationdesc0(int i) {
return FORTUNE[i];
}
}
Note that since the method being invoked (via MethodHandle) is an instance method, the first parameter to method invoke is the instance on which to invoke the method.

Maybe you're looking for Java 14 Switch Expressions:
int i = // initializing the variable
switch (i) {
case 0 -> this.setClassficationdesc0(..); // perform a side-effect
case 1 -> this.setClassficationdesc1(..); // perform a side-effect
case 2 -> this.setClassficationdesc2(..); // perform a side-effect
}

How to handle signs in java?

I have a command line with different parameters (strings and an int value).
The problem is that i have both spaces and = characters in this input string, which Java recognizes as separators.Now i wonder how to parse this into my program.
I look for a possibility to make it as simple as possible. The parameter values must also be passed to various subroutines. So I'm looking for a way to easily access the parameters to pass them to subroutines and at the same time control that each command line contains these parameters (and that they actually contain valid value).
Maybe someone could give me a hint how to do this the most "correct" way.

Something like this:
public class Demo {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Map<String, String> cliParams = new HashMap<>();
// Full set of required parameters
cliParams.put("t", null);
cliParams.put("vo", null);
cliParams.put("q", null);
for (String arg : args) {
String[] nameAndValue = arg.split("=", 2);
if (nameAndValue.length != 2)
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Invalid parameter syntax: " + arg);
String name = nameAndValue[0];
String value = nameAndValue[1];
if (cliParams.replace(name, value) != null)
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Parameter given more than once: " + arg);
}
cliParams.forEach((k, v) -> {
if (v == null)
throw new IllegalStateException("Required parameter missing: " + k);
});
int q = Integer.parseInt(cliParams.get("q"));
}
}

Passign attribute name as parameter automatically in Java-8

I would like to have a method to validate fields kind of
protected void validate(String field, String fieldName){
if (field==null || field.isEmpty){
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Parameter " + fieldName + " cannot be empty");
}
}
and use in my class for example
class Foo {
private String x;
private String y;
...
public void validateAll(){
validate(x, "x");
validate(y, "y");
}
}
It would be great to use in this way
public void validateAll(){
validate(x);
validate(y);
}
and let the compiler pass the name of the variable automatically to validate(field, fieldName) method
How can I achive this in Java-8 ?

You can achieve this in Java by abandoning the idea of having java classes with fields, and instead having a Map which maps Column objects to values. From a usage standpoint, it would look roughly like this:
public static final Column<String> X_COLUMN = new Column<>( "x", String.class );
public static final Column<String> Y_COLUMN = new Column<>( "y", String.class );
public static final Table FOO_TABLE = new Table( "Foo", X_COLUMN, Y_COLUMN, ... );
...
Row fooRow = new Row( FOO_TABLE );
fooRow.setFieldValue( X_COLUMN, "x" );
String x = fooRow.getFieldValue( X_COLUMN );
for( Column<?> column : fooRow.getTable().getColumns() )
doSomethingWithField( fooRow, column );
private static <T> void doSomethingWithField( Row row, Column<T> column )
{
T value = row.getFieldValue( column );
...do something with the field value...
}

Since a value passed as argument to a method bears no information about the field it originated from, if it was read from a field at all, you can’t reconstruct this information. However, since your intent to verify fields, the desired operation is possible when processing the fields in the first place, rather than their contained values:
class Foo {
private String x;
private String y;
//...
public void validateAll() {
for(Field f: Foo.class.getDeclaredFields()) {
if(!Modifier.isStatic(f.getModifiers()) && !f.getType().isPrimitive()) try {
Object o=f.get(this);
if(o==null || o.equals(""))
throw new IllegalArgumentException(f.getName()+" cannot be empty");
} catch(ReflectiveOperationException ex) { throw new AssertionError(); }
}
}
}
The general problem of this approach is that by the time validateAll() reports a problem, the Foo instance already contains the illegal state. It’s preferable to reject invalid values right when they are attempted to set for a property. In that case, the parameter name of the method might not be available reflectively, however, when a method named setX throws an IllegalArgumentException (as would be indicated by the stack trace), there is no need for an additional meta information in the message…

java.reflection.Method.invoke(...) Not re-casting args

I am trying out Java Reflection API. I am just fetching the Method objects of any given class into a JComboBox, and on it's itemSelected, creating an interface for the parameters (and of course, a calling object.)
This works fine, no issued.
But on the invokeButton's action, I am trying to invke the selected method with given params.
Initially it said that the param count differed. I was guided by one of my friend saying that the paramVals array has references to actual values, which might be causing problem, may be due to scope. I then started creating new objects of class Object and then assigning them the values. This worked for param count. But now the problem is that the parameters are not type cast properly. Even a String typecast to Object (as it has to be an array of Objects) is not being cast back to String.
The doc says that the invoke method will cast them on it's own and if cast fails, will throw an IllegalArgumentException.
I am not getting what is causing the call of invoke method fails...
Here is the code for the frame:
package nttraining.abhay.reflectiondemo;
//imports go here
public class ReflectionFrame
extends JFrame
implements ActionListener, ItemListener{
JComboBox methods;
JButton invokeButton;
public ReflectionFrame(String title) throws HeadlessException {
super(title);
//Layout components
//adding methods of class String to a combo
Class<String> c = String.class;
Method ml[] = c.getMethods();
for(Method m : ml){
methods.addItem(m);
}
invokeButton.addActionListener(this);
methods.addItemListener(this);
}
#Override
public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e) {
if(e.getSource().equals(invokeButton)){
Method selected = (Method) methods.getSelectedItem();
Class paramtypes[] = selected.getParameterTypes();
Object paramVals[] = new Object[paramtypes.length];
System.out.println("Method : " + selected.toString());
for(int i=0; i<paramtypes.length; i++){
Object obj = new Object();
obj = paramtypes[i].cast(params[i].getText());
paramVals[i] = obj;
System.out.println("Added " + paramtypes[i].cast(params[i].getText()).toString() + " to params");
}
try {
result.setText(selected.invoke(object.getText(), params).toString());
} catch (Exception ex) {
System.out.println(ex.getClass().getName() + ": " + ex.getMessage());
}
}
}
#Override
public void itemStateChanged(ItemEvent e) {
Method selected = (Method) methods.getSelectedItem();
if(selected==null)
return;
Class paramtypes[] = selected.getParameterTypes();
int paramCount = paramtypes.length;
object = new JTextField();
paramNames = new JLabel[paramCount];
params = new JTextField[paramCount];
panel.removeAll();
panel.setLayout(new GridLayout(paramCount+1, 2));
panel.add(new JLabel("Calling object"));
panel.add(object);
for(int i=0; i<paramCount; i++){
paramNames[i] = (JLabel) panel.add(new JLabel(paramtypes[i].getName()));
params[i] = (JTextField) panel.add(new JTextField());
}
invalidate();
validate();
}
}

A problem I found is in this line:
obj = paramtypes[i].cast(params[i].getText());
cast does not convert objects, it only verfies that the given object is of a certain class. Since you always provide a String.class as parameter (via .getText()), this will fail for anything other then a String type parameter. Even Integer.class to primitive int will fail.
Below a piece of code that demonstrates the cast problem.
import java.lang.reflect.Method;
import java.lang.reflect.Type;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
public class Q21642768 {
public static void main(String[] args) {
try {
// Calls String.indexOf(str, fromIndex) via reflection.
callStringMethod("Hello reflection world", "reflection", 1);
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
public static void callStringMethod(String s, String subString, int startIndex) throws Exception {
Class<String> c = String.class;
Method ma[] = c.getMethods();
Method indexOfSub = null;
Class<?>[] indexOfSubPTypes = null;
List<Method> stringMethods = new ArrayList<Method>();
List<Type[]> stringMethodsPTypes = new ArrayList<Type[]>();
for (Method m: ma) {
stringMethods.add(m);
System.out.print(m.getName() + ": ");
Class<?>[] mptypes = m.getParameterTypes();
stringMethodsPTypes.add(mptypes);
boolean first = true;
for (Type t : mptypes) {
if (first) {
first = false;
} else {
System.out.print(", ");
}
System.out.print(t.toString());
}
if ("indexOf".equals(m.getName())
&& mptypes.length == 2
&& mptypes[0].equals(String.class)
&& mptypes[1].equals(int.class)) {
indexOfSub = m;
indexOfSubPTypes = mptypes;
System.out.println(" <-- ");
} else {
System.out.println();
}
}
if (indexOfSub == null) {
System.out.println("target method not found");
return;
}
Object[] pValues = new Object[2];
pValues[0] = indexOfSubPTypes[0].cast(subString);
// Fails:
// pValues[1] = indexOfSubPTypes[1].cast(startIndex);
// pValues[1] = indexOfSubPTypes[1].cast(startIndex + "");
pValues[1] = startIndex;
Object result = indexOfSub.invoke(s, pValues);
System.out.println("Result: " + result);
}
}

The problem is that all your parameter values are String objects, since you get them with JTextField.getText(). String is the runtime type of these values, whereas the type of the method parameters will generally be different, and this is what matters.
To successfully invoke the method, you will first need to convert each value to the proper type specified in the paramTypes array. Neither cast() nor invoke() are going to do that for you. This means you must find a way to do the conversion from a String, basically deserializing from a String value into an object of the proper class, and that may not always be possible or too complex to do. At this point, I think you can start to imagine the complexity of what you are trying to do. This is very far from trivial. Remember that each parameter value will generally not be a simple value, but rather a full object graph, that's where the complexity is.
For example, if the type of a method parameter is an interface, how will you know which concrete implementation to instantiate? If you do find a concrete class implementing it - and that may not always be possible - how will you create instances of that class? Here you're entering a domain covered by serialization frameworks in Java. There are quite a few of these frameworks that are open source and you might want to take a look at some of them. You will find a comprenhesive list of such fraleworks here.
A few years ago, I worked on a related project, where I had to provide a Swing GUI to enable end-users to create objects of arbitrary types, used as input for a rule engine. What I came up with was a JTree with multiple roots, associated with a property sheet (i.e. a JTable with 2 columns), where the tree leaves were either simple types (primitives, primitive wrappers, Date, etc.) or object references. Each reference would point to a specific tree root representing the actual object to be later instantiated. I don't remember exactly how long it took, just that it took several months to get it tested and working.
So, I don't want to crush your hopes, but you should be aware that it's going to take a huge amount of work to do this.

Pass derived object into method wanting superclass using java reflection?

EDIT: I wasn't clear. I have to use reflection because I am interpreting from a command line. I am doing the reflection equivalent of the code examples I have provided.
hope this isn't a duplicate since it seems like an everyday thing to want to do.
I have a class A, and a class B that extends A. If I have a method in class C like public void doSomething(A a), how can I use reflection to pass a B object into this function? I want to do the (reflection) equivalent of:
B b = new B(); //B inherits from A
C c = new C();
c.doSomething(b); // method signature is doSomething(A a);
What I have done (using reflection) is:
get the Objects which are the arguments to the function.
get the Classes of the arguments
look up the method based upon the classes of the arguments.
invoke the method, passing in the argument Objects.
This works great if I were going to pass an A object into C.doSomething(...). However, if I am trying to pass a B object into C.doSomething(...) it fails on step 3, with this error:
java.lang.NoSuchMethodException: C.doSomething(B)
What is the appropriate way to get C.doSomething to recognize that B is an A? (when looking up a method using getDeclaredMethod(String name, Class... parameterTypes) and passing B.class in as the parameter type)
EDIT:
I'll post my own solution in case somebody wants to see one quickly hacked way of doing what Roland Illig suggested. In this example I reference these pre-made variables:
String methodToken; //the name of the method
Object obj; //the object whose method we are trying to call
Object[] args; //the user given arguments for the method
Class[] argTypes; //the types of the args gotten by args[i].getClass();
so...
//*** try to get the specified method from the object
Method m = null;
// if we are looking for a no-arg version of the method:
if(null == args)
{
try
{
m = obj.getClass().getMethod(methodToken, argTypes);
}
catch ( /*errors*/ )
{
// do stuff
}
}
else // if we are looking for a version of the method that takes arguments
{
// we have to do this type of lookup because our user arguments could be
// subclasses of the arguments required by the method. getMethod will not
// find a match in that case.
try
{
boolean matchFound = false;
Class c = obj.getClass();
do
{ // for each level in the inheritance hierarchy:
// get all the methods with the right name
//(matching the name that the user supplied for the method)
Method[] methodList = c.getMethods();
ArrayList<Method> matchingMethods = new ArrayList<Method>();
for( Method meth : methodList)
{
if(meth.getName().equals(methodToken))
{
matchingMethods.add(meth);
}
}
// check for a matching method signature
for( Method meth : matchingMethods)
{
// get the types of the arguments the method under
// investigation requires.
Class[] paramList = meth.getParameterTypes();
// make sure the signature has the required number of
// elements. If not, this is not the correct method.
if(paramList.length != args.length)
{
continue;
}
// Now check if each method argument is assignable from the
// type given by the user's provided arguments. This means
// that we are checking to see if each of the user's
// arguments is the same as, or is a superclass or
// superinterface of the type found in the method signature
//(i.e. it is legal to pass the user arguments to this
// method.) If one does not match, then this is not the
// correct method and we continue to the next one.
boolean signatureMatch = false;
for ( int i = 0; i < paramList.length; ++i)
{
if(paramList[i].isAssignableFrom( argTypes[i] ) )
{
signatureMatch = true;
}
else
{
continue;
}
}
// if we matched the signature on a matchingly named
// method, then we set the method m, and indicate
// that we have found a match so that we can stop
// marching up the inheritance hierarchy. (i.e. the
// containing loop will terminate.
if(true == signatureMatch)
{
m = meth;
matchFound = true;
break;
}
}
// move up one level in class hierarchy.
c = c.getSuperclass();
}
while(null != c && false == matchFound);
}
catch( /*errors*/)
{
// do stuff
}
}
// check that m got assigned
if(null == m)
{
System.out.println("From DO: unable to match method");
return false;
}
// try to invoke the method !!!!
try
{
m.invoke(obj, args);
}
catch ( /* errors */ )
{
// do stuff
}
Hope it will help someone sometime!

You need to follow the same process as outlined in the Java Language Specification, section 15.12 "Method Invocation Expressions", for finding the same method that would be found at compile time. In short, it's more complicated than you think.
A simple variant would be to check all the methods with the correct name (and don't forget the methods of all superclasses). For each of these methods, check whether all of your arguments are assignment-compatible to the corresponding method parameter. That might not be perfect, but works in most cases.
[Update:] The "simple variant" fails when there are multiple overloaded methods in a class. Here is some example code that you can play with:
package so7691729;
import static org.junit.Assert.*;
import java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException;
import java.lang.reflect.Method;
import java.util.Map;
import java.util.Set;
import org.junit.Test;
import com.google.common.collect.Maps;
import com.google.common.collect.Sets;
public class MethodCaller {
private boolean isCompatible(Method m, Object... args) {
Class<?>[] parameterTypes = m.getParameterTypes();
if (parameterTypes.length == args.length) {
for (int i = 0; i < args.length; i++) {
if (args[i] != null) {
if (!parameterTypes[i].isAssignableFrom(args[i].getClass())) {
// TODO: make primitive types equivalent to their boxed types.
return false;
}
}
}
} else {
// TODO: maybe handle varargs methods here
return false;
}
return true;
}
public Object call1(String fullyQualifiedMethodName, Object obj, Object... args) throws ClassNotFoundException, IllegalAccessException,
InvocationTargetException {
int lastDot = fullyQualifiedMethodName.lastIndexOf(".");
String className = fullyQualifiedMethodName.substring(0, lastDot);
String methodName = fullyQualifiedMethodName.substring(lastDot + 1);
Class<?> clazz = Class.forName(className);
for (Class<?> c = clazz; c != null; c = c.getSuperclass()) {
Set<String> sameNameMethods = Sets.newTreeSet();
Map<String, Method> compatibleMethods = Maps.newTreeMap();
for (Method method : c.getDeclaredMethods()) {
if (method.getName().equals(methodName)) {
sameNameMethods.add(method.toString());
if (isCompatible(method, args)) {
compatibleMethods.put(method.toString(), method);
}
}
}
if (compatibleMethods.size() > 1) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Multiple candidates: " + compatibleMethods.keySet());
}
if (compatibleMethods.size() == 1) {
return compatibleMethods.values().iterator().next().invoke(obj, args);
}
if (!sameNameMethods.isEmpty()) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Incompatible types for " + sameNameMethods);
}
}
throw new IllegalArgumentException("No method found.");
}
public Object call(String fullyQualifiedMethodName, Object obj, Object... args) {
try {
return call1(fullyQualifiedMethodName, obj, args);
} catch (ClassNotFoundException e) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException(e);
} catch (IllegalAccessException e) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException(e);
} catch (InvocationTargetException e) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException(e);
}
}
public String str(Object obj) {
return "object " + obj;
}
public String str(String str) {
return "string " + str;
}
public int add(int a, int b) {
return a + b;
}
#SuppressWarnings("boxing")
public int addObj(Integer a, Integer b) {
return a + b;
}
private void assertCallingError(String msg, String methodName, Object obj, Object... args) {
try {
call(methodName, obj, args);
fail();
} catch (IllegalArgumentException e) {
assertEquals(msg, e.getMessage());
}
}
#SuppressWarnings("boxing")
#Test
public void test() {
MethodCaller dummy = new MethodCaller();
assertEquals("object 1", call("so7691729.MethodCaller.str", dummy, 1));
assertCallingError("Multiple candidates: " + //
"[public java.lang.String so7691729.MethodCaller.str(java.lang.Object), " + //
"public java.lang.String so7691729.MethodCaller.str(java.lang.String)]", //
"so7691729.MethodCaller.str", dummy, "str");
assertCallingError("Incompatible types for [public int so7691729.MethodCaller.add(int,int)]", "so7691729.MethodCaller.add", dummy, 3, 4);
assertEquals(7, call("so7691729.MethodCaller.addObj", dummy, 3, 4));
assertCallingError("Incompatible types for [public int so7691729.MethodCaller.addObj(java.lang.Integer,java.lang.Integer)]", "so7691729.MethodCaller.addObj", dummy, "hello", "world");
}
}
And maybe the Java Beans specification or implementation has something for you. They may have had the same problem to solve. Or look at Rhino, a JavaScript implementation in pure Java. It lets you call Java methods directly from JavaScript code, so that is very similar to your problem.

3) look up the method based upon the classes of the arguments
You are asking the class: "Do you have any method with exactly this signature?" The class says "No!" You are not asking "Class, do you have something I can call with these parameters?" As already mentioned, this is not easy to answer as soon as inheritance and overloaded methods are involved and so the complete Reflection API does not address this issue.
However: You are not the first who wants a usable answer to the second question. Perhaps the MethodUtils.invokeMethod or any sibling from the Apache Commons Beanutils project is suitable for you.