I came across an interview question asking to design a word processor.
After my research I found Flyweight design pattern as an approach. I came up with below code (ignore syntax). But I am having hard time thinking of what will be my key and what will be my value for word processor.
public class Format
{
public readonly string _fontname;
public readonly string _weight;
public readonly int _size;
public Format(string fontname, string weight, string size)
{
_fontname = fontname;
_weight = weight;
_size = size;
}
}
public class TextFromatInfo
{
public _readonly Format _oFormat
public TextFormatInfo ( Format oformat)
{
_oFormat = oFormat;
}
public Format GetFormat
{
get {return this._oFormat}
}
public void ApplyFormat(format Format)
{
console.writeline ("apply format fontname: " format.forntname +
"size: " + format.size + "weight : " format.weight
}
}
public class TextFormatFactory
{
public readonly IDictionary<Format, TextFormatInfo> _cache =
new Dictionary <Format, TextFormatInfo>
public TextFormatInfo GetTextFormatInfo(Format oFormat)
{
if (_cache.ContainsKey(oFormat)) return _cache[oFormat];
var OTextFormatInfo= new TextFormatInfo(oFormat);
_cache.add(OTextFormatInfo.GetFormat, OTextFormatInfo);
return OTextFormatInfo ;
}
}
public class TestFlyWeight
{
private static TextFormatInfo[] formtInfo = new TextFormatInfo[100];
private static TextFormatFactory ff;
public void ProcessesWord(char c, string fontname, int size, string weight)
{
}
}
How would the above class look like? How can I complete the program by actually processing word?
Honestly I think they were maybe not so much interested in patterns as in architecture. But you might have given sufficient material for them to digest.
I would say MDI is a key topic here: multiple document interface. Multiple tabs with several documents.
Having one Document object per file system file (twice opening the same file), and possibly having several DocumentViews (swing: JTextPanes) per Document, bridged by the DocumentListener. In different tabs or in a vertically split single tab, so you may scroll to another spot and still remain at the first spot in split panes. _Specially stress, that this is se
Maybe building swing's EditorKit and StyledDocument.
So to make points of UI knowlegde, creativity, features, existing classes.
This all said, Patterns are an important asset in interviews too, I have experienced.
Related
Is setter method only use to assigning values? or can we perform operations in it. Here in this code the commented part is giving me correct output but while using set and get I am getting output as 0.
I want to avoid calling totalMarksOfStudent() method again and again because it have 5 parameters which I dont want to give again and again. So what is the way to return totalMarksStudent in another class without calling totalMarksOfStudent().
int totalMarksStudent = 0;
public void setMarks(int englishMarks, int mathsMarks, int physicsMarks, int chemistryMarks, int csMarks) {
totalMarksStudent = englishMarks + mathsMarks + physicsMarks + chemistryMarks + csMarks;
}
public int getMarks(){
return totalMarksStudent;
}
// public int totalMarksOfStudent(int englishMarks, int mathsMarks, int physicsMarks, int chemistryMarks, int csMarks) {
// totalMarksStudent = englishMarks + mathsMarks + physicsMarks + chemistryMarks + csMarks;
// return totalMarksStudent;
}
public String displayTotalMarks() {
String totalMarks1 = "Name " + name + "\tRoll No " + rollNo + "\tTotal Marks " + getMarks();//totalMarksOfStudent(englishMarks, mathsMarks, physicsMarks, chemistryMarks, csMarks);
return totalMarks1;
}
Better to avoid that...
I think it's better to have some fields like your parameters in setMarks (englishMarks , mathsMarks , ...) , and give value to them in constructor or setter methods. Also it's better to have a method named something like calculateTotalMarks , and call it without any parameters whenever you need it. Remember that there will be no problem to have operations in setter methods but usually and for better designed program we avoid that. Methods should do the thing their name says : for example , setter just for assigning , getter just for accessing values , calculateTotalMarks for calculating the total marks and so on ...
setter method is usually used to assigning values. It is promise.
You can reduce parameters by using Object
I recommend to make object of MarksStudent. because common attribute can bind to one class. It make understand easily code
for example
// Java is object-oriented language
class marksStudents {
private int english;
private int math;
private int physics;
private int chemistry;
private int cs;
//getMethods is Abbreviation
public int getTotal() {
return english+math+physics+chemistry+cs;
}
//setMethods
public void setEnglish(int english) {
this.english = english;
}
public void setMath(int math) {
this.math = math;
}
public void setPhysics(int physics) {
this.physics = physics;
}
public void setChemistry(int chemistry) {
this.chemistry = chemistry;
}
public void setCs(int cs) {
this.cs = cs;
}
}
To execute
public class Main{
public static void main(String[] args) {
// You can make object marksStudents of studentsA
marksStudents studentsA = new marksStudents();
studentsA.setChemistry(20);
studentsA.setEnglish(30);
studentsA.setMath(40);
studentsA.setCs(50);
studentsA.setPhysics(60);
//200
System.out.println(studentsA.getTotal());
// You can make object marksStudents of studentsB too
marksStudents studentsB = new marksStudents();
studentsB.setChemistry(10);
studentsB.setEnglish(10);
studentsB.setMath(10);
studentsB.setCs(10);
studentsB.setPhysics(10);
//50
System.out.println(studentsB.getTotal());
}
}
The getter/setter method is only a practice. Not bad practice - it just defines a class, whose instances for the external world are handled by a list of independent values. Using them makes your code better comprehensible and easy to understand, what is it doing.
So it is no problem to make other operations with it, in general.
Some frameworks like to use reflection to use getters/setters and also reach the variables directly in them. In these cases, doing any different in the getters/setters than reading/writing the private members is no wise idea. Sometimes you can use a little bit of api/impl interface trickery to handle this problem.
I decided to create an account in order to ask a question I cant seem to figure out myself, or by some googling, hopefully I didn't just overlook it.
Essentially I am trying to make a text adventure game in Java, and am having a little trouble seeing how I should relate everything in the idea of objects. I have been successful in using XML stax and sending a file to the program, and using attributes and what not, to make it where the user can enter an integer associated with an option, and see if option requires an "item" or gives them an Item. I however did not take an OOP to this.
I want my new program to people able to take a string of user input in, instead of only an integer, and checking it against an array list if it exists. This is closer to the classic MUDs most may be familiar with.
I want to design it in a modular way, so I can slowly add on ideas, and more complexity to go along, so I don't want a "well it works so lets leave it alone" approach either.
Currently I simply want something close to this:
A Room object, which would have: an ID, Description, and interact-able
a Choice object (this one im not sure on) I thought about making an object to hold each rooms possible choices, both for exit, and for interact-ables
if so, the room object may need a Choice Object.
I've thought it over, tried some code, thought it over again, and every time, I keep ending up hard coding more than I feel I should, and making tons more variables than I feel are necessary, which makes me feel like i'm missing something crucial in my thinking.
I also want these rooms to be created through an inputted file, not generated in the code (so essentially the code is a story reader/crafter for any type, not one)
I have also been attempting this too long, and my solutions are becoming worse, but below was my most recent attempt at a rough Idea:
a GameManager class that takes the userInput and checks it some, before passing it along. I havent passed any data because im not sure of the approach. also im not used to regex, so some of that may also be wrong, if it is, maybe point it out, but that is not my focus
import java.util.Scanner;
public class GameManager {
private static final String EXIT_PHRASE = "exit";
public static void main(String[] args) {
Scanner userInput = new Scanner(System.in);
String userStringVal = "";
while(!userStringVal.equals(EXIT_PHRASE)){
userStringVal= userInput.nextLine();
if(checkKeywords(userStringVal)){
System.out.println("matches keyword");
}
else System.out.println("didnt match a keyword");
}
userInput.close();
}
public static boolean checkKeywords(String string){
boolean isKeyword = false;
string.toLowerCase();
if(string.matches("travel.*") || string.matches("search.*")){
System.out.println("passed first check");
String substring = string.substring(6);
if(matchDirection(substring)){
isKeyword = true;
}
}
return isKeyword;
}
public static boolean matchDirection(String string){
boolean hasDirection = false;
if(string.matches(".*\\bnorth|south|east|west|northeast|northwest|southeast| southwest|up|down")){
hasDirection = true;
}
return hasDirection;
}
}
The Room object I thought about as such:
import javax.xml.stream.XMLStreamException;
import javax.xml.stream.XMLStreamReader;
public class Room {
private String roomDescription = "";
private int roomID=0;
private int northExit=0;
private int southExit=0;
private int eastExit=0;
private int westExit=0;
private int northeastExit=0;
private int northwestExit=0;
private int southeastExit=0;
private int southwestExit=0;
private int upExit=0;
private int downExit=0;
private String[] interactables = new String[10];
private Options options = new Options();
public Room(XMLStreamReader reader) throws XMLStreamException{
setAttValues(reader);
setRoomDescription(reader);
setUpOptions();
}
public void setinteractables(XMLStreamReader reader){
int count = reader.getAttributeCount();
for(int i = 0; i < count; i++){
interactables[i] = reader.getAttributeValue(i);
}
}
public void setAttValues(XMLStreamReader reader){
int count = reader.getAttributeCount();
for(int i = 0; i < count; i++){
String att = reader.getAttributeLocalName(i);
if(att !=""){
switch(att){
case "North": northExit=Integer.parseInt(att);
case "South": southExit=Integer.parseInt(att);
case "East": eastExit=Integer.parseInt(att);
case "West": westExit=Integer.parseInt(att);
case "NorthEast": northeastExit=Integer.parseInt(att);
case "NorthWest": northwestExit=Integer.parseInt(att);
case "SouthEast": southeastExit=Integer.parseInt(att);
case "SouthWest": southwestExit=Integer.parseInt(att);
case "Up": upExit=Integer.parseInt(att);
case "Down": downExit=Integer.parseInt(att);
case "ID": roomID=Integer.parseInt(att);
}
}
}
}
public void setRoomDescription(XMLStreamReader reader) throws XMLStreamException{
roomDescription = reader.getElementText();
}
public void setUpOptions(){
options.setCardinalPointers(northExit, southExit, eastExit, westExit);
options.setIntercardinalPointers(northeastExit, northwestExit, southeastExit, southwestExit);
options.setElevationPointers(upExit, downExit);
}
}
what can I do to make sure I dont have to state so many directions with so many variables?
here is a quick and rough idea of an Option class that I thought about, but i didn't finish deciding I am already too far in the wrong direction
public class Options {
private int northPointer = 0;
private int southPointer= 0;
private int eastPointer = 0;
private int westPointer = 0;
private int northeastPointer= 0;
private int northwestPointer = 0;
private int southeastPointer = 0;
private int southwestPointer = 0;
private int upPointer = 0;
private int downPointer = 0;
private String northInteractable = "";
private String southInteractable = "";
private String eastInteractable = "";
private String westInteractable = "";
private String northeastInteractable ="";
private String northwestInteractable = "";
private String southeastInteractable = "";
private String southwestInteractable = "";
private String upInteractable = "";
private String downInteractable = "";
public Options(){
}
public void setCardinalPointers(int north, int south, int east, int west){
northPointer = north;
southPointer = south;
eastPointer = east;
westPointer = west;
}
public void setIntercardinalPointers(int northeast, int northwest, int southeast, int southwest){
northeastPointer = northeast;
northwestPointer=northwest;
southeastPointer=southeast;
southwestPointer=southwest;
}
public void setElevationPointers(int up, int down){
upPointer = up;
downPointer = down;
}
public String whatToReturn(String string){
String importantPart = "";
if(string.matches("travel.*")){
String substring = string.substring(6);
}
else {
importantPart = "Interactable";
String substring = string.substring(6);
if (substring.matches("\\bnorth\\b")) {
if(northInteractable!=0){
}
}
else if (substring.matches("\\bsouth\\b"))
else if (substring.matches("\\beast\\b"))
else if (substring.matches("\\bwest\\b"))
else if (substring.contains("northeast"))
else if (substring.contains("northwest"))
else if (substring.contains("southeast"))
else if (substring.contains("southwest"))
else if (substring.contains("up"))
else if (substring.contains("down"))
}
return importantPart;
}
}
I did not see the adventure tag until after I typed this, so I will start perusing through there, but will still post this, so my apologies if there is a good answer to this and I have yet to find it.
as a recap: what would be a good way to relate a few objects to create a room object (that gets its information from a file (XML being what im used to)) having exits, descriptions, and interactions. and the user interacting with these based off keywords that can be inputted freely, and not restricted to say, index values of array's holding keywords.
Im thinking when the user types something like "travel north" to first check if they typed a keyword, in this case being travel, then a direction. Then somewhree else checking if it states travel, check north with a possible northExit a room may or may not have. Then if its another keyword, say like check, to make it easy also have the exact same directions, but check for a different string.
Then if room "northExit" exists, get an option somehow, with a pointer to another roomID. though This thought process causes me issues when thinking about future possibility of requiring items for getting to the next room. Also where to store/acquire these options is causing some difficulties.
There are two things I would like to introduce to you. The first, in the enum. You can think of this as a special kind of class where all the possible options are enumerated in the class definition. This is perfect for things like, in your case, directions. Enums can be simple, where you just list all of the possible options for use in other classes:
public enum Direction {
NORTH, NORTH_EAST, EAST, SOUTH_EAST, SOUTH, SOUTH_WEST, WEST, NOTH_WEST;
}
They can be a bit more complex, if you want them to have methods and attributes of their own:
public enum Direction {
NORTH(true), NORTH_EAST(false), EAST(true), SOUTH_EAST(false), SOUTH(true), SOUTH_WEST(false), WEST(true), NOTH_WEST(false);
private final boolean isCardinal;
private Direction(boolean isCardinal){
this.isCardinal = isCardinal;
}
public boolean isCardinal(){
return isCardinal;
}
public static Collection<Direction> getCardinalDirections(){
return Arrays.asList(Direction.values()).stream().filter(Direction::isCardinal).collect(Collectors.toList());
}
public static Collection<Direction> getIncardinalDirections(){
return Arrays.asList(Direction.values()).stream().filter(x -> !x.isCardinal()).collect(Collectors.toList());
}
}
Please read more about Java enum types here.
The second thing I would like to introduce to you is the data structure known as the Map. Maps are also known as Dictionaries, and that can often help understanding how they work. A Map will take one object and map it to another object, like how a Dictionary maps a word to its definition, or a phonebook maps a person's name to their phone number. We can simplify your Room class a ton by using a Map. I am not going to reproduce all of your code, since I'm focusing on your Room exists right now:
public class Room {
private Map<Direction, Room> exits;
public Room(){
this.exits = new HashMap<>();
}
public void setExit(Direction direction, Room room){
this.exits.put(direction, room);
}
public Room getExit(Direction direction){
return this.exits.get(direction);
}
}
Please read more about the Java Map interface here.
You will, of course, need to adapt your methods which are reading from XML, etc. But, now, your Room class should be greatly simplified.
I hope this points you in a helpful direction.
In Java, where should I aim (I enjoy figuring it out myself) to get, with sample data:
I am Sam I am a
the output:
I am Sam I am - letter to remove a
I m Sm I m
Basically, it is to "Remove all instances of the specified removal letter from the original sentence"
As this is for a class, I am limited with what I can do. For this assignment I am stuck with the given classes/constructors and am not allowed to make any more unless it is noted, which in my case, is to create another constructor class; Anyway, that has been the real challenge as it is hard to get help (No matter how many times I've googled!) with it being so specific and I new to the language.
Here is what I was given:
import static java.lang.System.*;
public class LetterRemover
{
private String sentence;
private char lookFor;
public LetterRemover()
{
//call set
}
//add in second constructor
public void setRemover(String s, char rem)
{
sentence = s;
lookFor = rem;
}
public String removeLetters()
{
String cleaned=sentence;
return cleaned;
}
public String toString()
{
return sentence + " - letter to remove " + lookFor;
}
}
This is what I've done so far:
import java.util.Scanner;
import static java.lang.System.*;
public class LetterRemover
{
private String sentence;
private String lookFor;
public LetterRemover()
{
//I am not sure what this means
}
//add in second constructor
public void setRemover(String s, String rem)
{
sentence = s;
lookFor = rem;
}
public String removeLetters()
{
sentence = sentence.replaceAll(lookFor,"");
String cleaned=sentence;
return cleaned;
}
public String toString()
{
return sentence + " - letter to remove " + lookFor;
}
}
I tried changing the char to a string for the "lookfor" to use the replace all method which seemed after a lot of research and the best way to get the letters out.
Is there any noticeable mistakes and where should I look to fix them? I do not really want the right code, or for anyone to "do" the work for me. I really want to try and figure it out. But I need a little help in pointing in the right direction to get my desired output :)
Let me know if there is any other details or whatnot, this is also , this is also my first time using the site. There were many similar questions to this, but as I really am a beginner I struggled to understand people's explanations
--Edit--
Moving to my runner class, this is what I wrote, trying to get for the desired output. I am not really sure how to deal with output as I really have just started learning to write them myself.
I keep getting a void error though:
import static java.lang.System.*;
public class LetterRemoverRunner
{
public static void main( String args[] )
{
LetterRemover test = new LetterRemover
(test.setRemover("I really want dumplings","l"));
}
}
Try the below code and confirm this is what your requirement is.
LetterRemoverRunner.java
public class LetterRemoverRunner {
public static void main(String args[])
{
LetterRemover test = new LetterRemover ();
test.setRemover("I really want dumplings","l");
System.out.println(test.toString());
System.out.println("Removed :"+test.removeLetters());
}
}
LetterRemover.java
public class LetterRemover
{
private String sentence;
private String lookFor;
public LetterRemover()
{
//I am not sure what this means
}
public void setRemover(String s, String rem)
{
this.sentence = s;
this.lookFor = rem;
}
public String removeLetters()
{
sentence = sentence.replaceAll(lookFor,"");
String cleaned=sentence;
return cleaned;
}
public String toString()
{
return sentence + " - letter to remove " + lookFor;
}
}
I'm pleased you suggested you don't want the answer - much better way to learn!
I'm not sure you've understood constructors yet. You're line:
LetterRemover test = new LetterRemover
(test.setRemover("I really want dumplings","l"));
Is going to give you a null pointer error because it's calling setRemover on test before test has been constructed. You should be constructing the object with its sentence and lookFor values before calling setRemover.
Here are some things you might want to look at:
The String.indexOf method will look for a certain character or string and tell you where to find it (or if it isn't in the string at all).
The String.substring method allows you to take part of a string using string positions
You can build a new string by concatenating substrings together
Using a while loop you can continue using indexOf until the target cannot be found.
As you've pointed out, you can also use one of the replace methods to replace the target with "".
I have Arraylist of objects ArrayList<Product> productDatabase. The object contains a String and a double and then these objects will be added to the productDatabase by addProductToDatabase(); as follows:
public void addProductToDatabase(String productName, double dimensions); {
Product newProduct = new Product(ProductName, dimensions);
productDatabase.add(newProduct);
}
I also want to make an Arraylist<ProductCount> productInventory which counts how many Product are accounted for. Before it can add to ArrayList<ProductCount> productInventory however, it should first check if the object details exist in the productDatabase while running addProductToInventory()
public Product getProduct(String name) {
for(i = 0; i < productDatabase.size(); i++)
if(productDatabase.get(i).contains(name) //Error: cannot find symbol- method contains.(java.lang.String)
return productDatabase.get(i)
}
public void addProductToInventory(String productName, double quantity)
{
Product p = getProduct(name);
productCount.add(new ProductCount(o, quantity));
}
Assume that you always have different objects (so nothing will have the same name), but you're always unsure of the dimensions (so when you input the same producttName + dimensions you edit the dimensions in it).
At the end of the day, you have to put all the items in it a large box and report what you've inventoried, so you also have a getProductQuantityTotal() and you have to getProductDimensionTotal()-- as the name suggests, get the total of number of objects you've counted, and the sum of the dimensions.
What do I have to add/change/remove about this code? Don't consider syntax first (because BlueJ checks for common syntax errors and I just typed this by hand). I'm sure that I'm missing a for statement somewhere, and I'm probably misusing contains() because it won't recognise it (I have import java.util.*; and import java.util.ArrayList;)
To answer the question in your post title: How to find a string in an object, for a list of those objects, here is some sample code that does this:
First, I created a trivial object that has a string field:
class ObjectWithStringField {
private final String s;
public ObjectWithStringField(String s) {
this.s = s;
}
public String getString() {
return s;
}
}
And then a code that populates a list of it, and then searches each for the string. There's no magic here, it just iterates through the list until a match is found.
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Arrays;
/**
<P>{#code java StringInObjectInList}</P>
**/
public class StringInObjectInList {
public static final void main(String[] ignored) {
ObjectWithStringField[] owStrArr = new ObjectWithStringField[] {
new ObjectWithStringField("abc"),
new ObjectWithStringField("def"),
new ObjectWithStringField("ghi")};
//Yes this is a List instead of an ArrayList, but you can easily
//change this to work with an ArrayList. I'll leave that to you :)
List<ObjectWithStringField> objWStrList = Arrays.asList(owStrArr);
System.out.println("abc? " + doesStringInObjExistInList("abc", objWStrList));
System.out.println("abcd? " + doesStringInObjExistInList("abcd", objWStrList));
}
private static final boolean doesStringInObjExistInList(String str_toFind, List<ObjectWithStringField> owStrList_toSearch) {
for(ObjectWithStringField owStr : owStrList_toSearch) {
if(owStr.getString().equals(str_toFind)) {
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
}
Output:
[C:\java_code\]java StringInObjectInList
abc? true
abcd? false
In the real world, instead of a List, I'd use a Map<String,ObjectWithStringField>, where the key is that field. Then it'd be as simple as themap.containsKey("abc");. But here it is implemented as you require. You'll still have quite a bit of work to do, to get this working as specifically required by your assignment, but it should get you off to a good start. Good luck!
I am fairly new to Java and Jung. I am writing a program where I need to add probabilities on edges of the event occurrence(means probability of the event that data will flow from first node to other). I am a little confuse that will Max-Flow do the trick for me or do I need to use some other option or there is no option to do it within Jung and in that case do I need to write it on my own? Any help in this regard will be appreciated.
regards,
waqas
Do you intend to set the edge weights to represent the probabilities of certain events? The Max-Flow algorithm will use the "capacities" you assign to each edge to find the path of maximum flow from the source vertex to the sink vertex. What exactly are you trying to do here?
I'm not very sure what your final aim is, so I'll try my best to help out.
You can first represent the probabilities by defining a custom Edge and Edge Factory classes. What I did was:
0. Imports:
import org.apache.commons.collections15.Factory;
1. Add in your custom classes. They custom edge class might be something like:
public static class MyEdge {
private int flow;
private int capacity;
private String name;
private int eIndex;
public MyEdge(String name, int eIndex) {
this.name = name;
this.eIndex = eIndex;
}
public int getCapacity() {
return this.capacity;
}
public void setCapacity(int edgeCapacity) {
this.capacity = edgeCapacity;
}
public int getFlow() {
return this.flow;
}
public void setFlow(int edgeFlow) {
this.flow = edgeFlow;
}
public String toString() {
return this.name;
}
}
The custom edge factory is what actually creates your edges each time you draw them on the canvas graphically, it might look like:
public static class MyEdgeFactory implements Factory {
private static int defaultFlow = 0;
private static int defaultCapacity = 0;
private int edgeCount;
private MyEdgeFactory() {
}
public MyEdge create() {
String name = "E" + edgeCount;
MyEdge e = new MyEdge(name, edgeCount);
edgeCount++;
e.setFlow(defaultFlow);
e.setCapacity(defaultCapacity);
return e;
}
}
2. Tell your visualization viewer how to display the edge labels; you'll need to add this in wherever you're creating your graph and VisualizationViewer object (vv):
vv.getRenderContext().setEdgeLabelTransformer(new Transformer() {
public String transform(MyEdge e) {
return (e.toString() + " " + e.getFlow() + "/" + e.getCapacity());
}
});
Now everytime you create an edge, it's label will be of the form "E0 0/0", "E1 0/0" and so on.
I'll be posting detailed tutorials and code on my blog soon so you could watch that space if you're going to be spending significant time on whatever project you're working on.
Look at the way you're calling setEdgeLabelTransformer, you need to pass it a new Transformer(), like I've done in my code snippet numbered 2.
When you pass a new ToStringLabeller(), you're telling the viewer to label using the toString() method of the edge object. You'll need to pass a custom Transformer instead, just correct your code to look like mine and you'll be fine.