I'm having a problem with GridLayout and the entire JPanel not being filled. I have a N * M Grid, and I'm filling it with N * M Tiles (They extend JPanel). After adding all these tiles there is still space on the bottom and the right side of the JPanel. I thought GridLayout was supposed to fill up the entire JPanel, and make everything in it evenly sized?
Edit: I didn't want to post all the code since there are multiple classes. Thought maybe there was a simple solution.
public class MainFrame extends JFrame {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 3985493842977428355L;
private final int FRAME_HEIGHT = 800;
private final int FRAME_WIDTH = 700;
private MainPanel mainPanel;
public MainFrame() {
super("Test");
setDefaultCloseOperation(JFrame.EXIT_ON_CLOSE);
setSize(FRAME_HEIGHT, FRAME_WIDTH);
setLocationRelativeTo(null);
mainPanel = new MainPanel();
getContentPane().add(mainPanel);
setVisible(true);
}
}
public class MainPanel extends JPanel {
/**
*
*/
private static final long serialVersionUID = 3421071253693531472L;
private RoutePanel routePanel;
private ControlPanel controlPanel;
private GridBagConstraints gridBagConstraints;
private GridBagLayout gridBagLayout;
public MainPanel() {
routePanel = new RoutePanel();
controlPanel = new ControlPanel();
setBackground(Color.black);
gridBagLayout = new GridBagLayout();
setLayout(gridBagLayout);
gridBagConstraints = new GridBagConstraints();
createLayout();
}
private void createLayout() {
gridBagConstraints.weightx = 1;
gridBagConstraints.weighty = 1;
gridBagConstraints.gridx = 0;
gridBagConstraints.gridy = 0;
gridBagConstraints.anchor = GridBagConstraints.NORTH;
gridBagConstraints.fill = GridBagConstraints.BOTH;
gridBagLayout.setConstraints(routePanel, gridBagConstraints);
add(routePanel);
gridBagConstraints.weightx = 1;
gridBagConstraints.weighty = .05;
gridBagConstraints.gridx = 0;
gridBagConstraints.gridy = 1;
gridBagConstraints.anchor = GridBagConstraints.SOUTH;
gridBagConstraints.fill = GridBagConstraints.BOTH;
gridBagLayout.setConstraints(controlPanel, gridBagConstraints);
add(controlPanel);
}
}
public class RoutePanel extends JPanel{
/**
*
*/
private static final long serialVersionUID = 4366703088208967594L;
private final int GRID_ROWS = 30;
private final int GRID_COLS = 47;
public RoutePanel() {
setLayout(new GridLayout(GRID_ROWS, GRID_COLS, 0, 0));
for(int i = 0; i < GRID_ROWS * GRID_COLS; i++) {
add(new Tile());
}
setBackground(Color.orange);
}
}
public ControlPanel() {
}
public Tile() {
setBackground(Color.gray);
Border blackline;
blackline = BorderFactory.createLineBorder(Color.black);
setBorder(blackline);
}
Since you're not posting code, we are forced to guess (and this is not good).
My guess: you may be setting the size or the preferred sizes of some of your components or the GUI, and this is causing gaps at the edges of your GUI.
Solution: don't do this. Let the components size themselves via their preferred sizes and the layout managers when pack() is called on the GUI.
For more helpful help, create and post your sscce. For a question like this, code is really mandatory, and I'm a bit surprised actually that you didn't post yours.
Edit 1
For example, note the difference in the GUI's produced:
import java.awt.Color;
import java.awt.Dimension;
import java.awt.GridLayout;
import javax.swing.*;
public class GapExample {
private static final int M = 5;
private static final int N = 6;
private static final int PREF_W = 700;
private static final int PREF_H = 500;
#SuppressWarnings("serial")
private static void createAndShowGui() {
// *** attempt 1: set preferredSize of the mainPanel JPanel ***
JPanel mainPanel = new JPanel(new GridLayout(M, N));
mainPanel.setBorder(BorderFactory.createLineBorder(Color.red));
mainPanel.setPreferredSize(new Dimension(PREF_W, PREF_H));
for (int i = 0; i < M; i++) {
for (int j = 0; j < N; j++) {
String text = String.format("Foo [%d, %d]", i, j);
JLabel label = new JLabel(text, SwingConstants.CENTER);
label.setBorder(BorderFactory.createLineBorder(Color.blue));
mainPanel.add(label);
}
}
JOptionPane.showMessageDialog(null, mainPanel,
"Attempt 1, setPreferredSize of mainPane",
JOptionPane.PLAIN_MESSAGE);
// *** attempt 2: override the getPreferredSize of the JLabel cells in the
// grid ***
mainPanel = new JPanel(new GridLayout(M, N));
mainPanel.setBorder(BorderFactory.createLineBorder(Color.red));
final Dimension labelPrefSize = new Dimension(PREF_W / N, PREF_H / M);
for (int i = 0; i < M; i++) {
for (int j = 0; j < N; j++) {
String text = String.format("Foo [%d, %d]", i, j);
JLabel label = new JLabel(text, SwingConstants.CENTER) {
#Override
public Dimension getPreferredSize() {
return labelPrefSize;
}
};
label.setBorder(BorderFactory.createLineBorder(Color.blue));
mainPanel.add(label);
}
}
JOptionPane
.showMessageDialog(null, mainPanel,
"Attempt 2, override getPreferredSize of the JLabel cells in the grid",
JOptionPane.PLAIN_MESSAGE);
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
SwingUtilities.invokeLater(new Runnable() {
public void run() {
createAndShowGui();
}
});
}
}
In the second dialog, I have the JLabels return a preferred size and let the containers that hold them set the best size to display the GUI, and you'll with the second attempt, the grid fits much better.
This displays for the first (bad) attempt a gap between the inner and outer components:
And the second (good) attempt shows no such gap:
GridLayout was supposed to fill up the entire JPanel, and make
everything in it evenly sized
these two are opposing forces, the manager can do both at the same time only if the panel width is a multiple of the column width:
panel.width == column.width * column.count
If that's not possible, it favors the equal-size constraint, by sizing the children to the largest width to make them equal and positions the whole block in the center of parent, thus exposing the parent's background. Basically, you are seeing the effects of integer math :-)
As to the discussion in the other answer,
First off: my take on setXXSize is well known - it's always wrong to use in application code I think it's a design accident, should never have happened in the first place because most of the time it introduces more problems than it seems (superficially!) to solve.
Next-nearest solution seems to override getXXSize: if done to return an arbitrary hard-coded fixed size, it's only marginally better than calling setXXSize (in not propagating worst practices :): the return value should be related to internal state. It should keep internal calculation (if any) of super intact and can modify it. Plus strictly speaking, it should comply to super's contract which indeed states (a bit hidden in setXXSize) that the dimension applied via setXXSize takes precedence
Sets the preferred size of this component to a constant value.
Subsequent calls to getPreferredSize will always return this value.
In code:
// always wrong in application code
someComponent.setPreferredSize(labelPrefSize);
// suboptimal: arbitrary hard-coded fixed size
#Override
public Dimension getPreferredSize() {
return new Dimension(labelPrefSize);
}
// good: fixed value based on internal state
#Override
public Dimension getPreferredSize() {
return new Dimension(labelPrefSize);
}
// the size has some meaning f.i. when painting
#Override
protected void paintComponent(Graphics g) {
g.drawRect(0, 0, labelPrefSize.width, labelPrefSize.height);
}
// good: prefsize relative to super's calculation
#Override
public Dimension getPreferredSize() {
Dimension labelPrefSize = super.getPreferredSize();
int maxSide = Math.max(labelPrefSize.width, labelPrefSize.height);
labelPrefSize.setSize(maxSide, maxSide);
return labelPrefSize;
}
// better: prefsize relative to default calculation
// _and_ comply to super's contract
#Override
public Dimension getPreferredSize() {
Dimension labelPrefSize = super.getPreferredSize();
if (isPreferredSizeSet()) return labelPrefSize;
// any of the good thingies ...
}
Ideally, though, you would not touch the internal calculation of sizing hints at all. Instead, use a LayoutManager that allows to fine tune the layout to exactly suit your needs. Remember: the manager takes the hints and is free to size however she likes anyway :-)
Update
edited the above trying to emphasize the "related to internal state" thingy: sizing hints should return their own isolated, ego-centric requirement without caring about context. So overriding to return something that pleases an outside need is suboptimal.
Related
I am trying to create a grid comprised of 100 squares. My code below is extremely buggy and I am not sure why.
import javax.swing.*;
import javax.swing.border.Border;
import java.awt.*;
public class snake extends JFrame
{
public static void main(String[] args)
{
Border whiteLine = BorderFactory.createLineBorder(Color.white);
//-----------FRAME
JFrame frame = new JFrame();
frame.setSize(1000,1000);
frame.setTitle("Snake");
frame.setDefaultCloseOperation(EXIT_ON_CLOSE);
frame.getContentPane().setBackground(Color.black);
frame.setVisible(true);
frame.setLayout(new GridLayout(10,10));
//-----------FRAME
//-----------PANELS
Dimension panelDimension = new Dimension(20,20);
int counter = 0;
JPanel[][] p = new JPanel[10][10];
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
{
for (int j = 0; j < 10; j++)
{
p[i][j] = new JPanel();
//p[i][j].setPreferredSize(panelDimension);
p[i][j].setBackground(Color.red);
//p[i][j].setLocation(490,490);
p[i][j].setBorder(whiteLine);
p[i][j].setVisible(true);
frame.getContentPane().add(p[i][j]);
counter+=1;
}
}
System.out.println("counter: " + counter);
}
}
When I run the code like this it shows a grid comprised of 2 columns the first column has 7 rows and the second column has 6. Sometimes it even shows other incorrect numbers of columns and rows. I am not sure why it doesn't create a grid of 10 rows 10 columns.
You've got several problems including:
Calling setVisible(true) on the JFrame before adding components, before calling pack() on the top-level window. This can lead to wonky positioned components within our GUI's or even GUI's that remain empty
Not calling pack() on the JFrame after adding components and before setting it visible
Setting the size of the JFrame. Let the layout managers, containers and components do this for you (which is what calling pack() is for)
Setting it to a bad size, a "perfect square", one that ignores the menu bar that the OS adds,
...
For example:
package foo01;
import java.awt.Color;
import java.awt.Dimension;
import java.awt.GridLayout;
import java.awt.event.MouseAdapter;
import java.awt.event.MouseEvent;
import javax.swing.*;
#SuppressWarnings("serial")
public class SnakePanel extends JPanel {
private static final int CELL_WIDTH = 80;
private static final Dimension CELL_DIMENSION = new Dimension(CELL_WIDTH, CELL_WIDTH);
private static final int COLUMNS = 10;
private static final int GAP = 2;
private static final Color BG_COLOR = Color.WHITE;
private static final Color CELL_COLOR = Color.RED;
public SnakePanel() {
setBackground(BG_COLOR);
// add a white line around the grid
setBorder(BorderFactory.createEmptyBorder(GAP, GAP, GAP, GAP));
// create a grid with gaps that show the background (white) color
setLayout(new GridLayout(COLUMNS, COLUMNS, GAP, GAP));
for (int row = 0; row < COLUMNS; row++) {
for (int col = 0; col < COLUMNS; col++) {
JPanel cell = new JPanel(); // create a new cell
cell.setPreferredSize(CELL_DIMENSION); // cheating here. Better to override getPreferredSize()
cell.setBackground(CELL_COLOR);
add(cell);
// give the cell JPanel some simple behavior:
cell.addMouseListener(new MyMouse(col, row));
}
}
}
private class MyMouse extends MouseAdapter {
private int col;
private int row;
public MyMouse(int col, int row) {
this.col = col;
this.row = row;
}
#Override
public void mousePressed(MouseEvent e) {
System.out.printf("Mouse pressed row and column: [%d, %d]%n", row, col);
}
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
SwingUtilities.invokeLater(() -> {
// create the main JPanel
SnakePanel snakePanel = new SnakePanel();
// create the JFrame
JFrame frame = new JFrame("Snake");
frame.setDefaultCloseOperation(JFrame.EXIT_ON_CLOSE);
// add the main JPanel to the JFrame
frame.add(snakePanel);
// pack the JFrame -- tells the layout managers to do their things
frame.pack();
// if we want to center the GUI:
frame.setLocationRelativeTo(null);
// only *now* do we display the GUI
frame.setVisible(true);
});
}
}
Some notes on the code:
Any code within the Runnable passed into the SwingUtilities.invokeLater(...) method is called on the Swing event thread, which is a wise thing to do when creating a Swing GUI
SwingUtilities.invokeLater(() -> {
// ....
});
First, create the main JPanel that is held by the JFrame:
SnakePanel snakePanel = new SnakePanel();
Then create the JFrame, add that JPanel and call pack(). The pack call tells the layout managers to do there thing, to lay out components within containers, to size things based on their preferred sizes and their layouts:
JFrame frame = new JFrame("Snake");
frame.setDefaultCloseOperation(JFrame.EXIT_ON_CLOSE);
frame.add(snakePanel);
frame.pack();
if we want to center the GUI:
frame.setLocationRelativeTo(null);
only now do we display the GUI
frame.setVisible(true);
This is a follow-up to this question. Any viable answer will also answer that one.
What layout may be used with as little modification as possible to replicate the aligning nature of a FlowLayout, but never linebreak and also be available in a from-top-to-bottom flavour?
The obvious candidate, BoxLayout, does not work nicely with JPanels. Consider the following two examples:
import javax.swing.Box;
import javax.swing.BoxLayout;
import javax.swing.JFrame;
import javax.swing.JLabel;
import javax.swing.JPanel;
class App
{
public static void main(String[] args)
{
JFrame window = new JFrame();
Box box = new Box(BoxLayout.Y_AXIS);
for(int i = 0; i < 5; ++i)
{
JLabel label = new JLabel("XX");
box.add(label);
}
box.add(Box.createVerticalGlue());
window.add(box);
window.setDefaultCloseOperation(JFrame.EXIT_ON_CLOSE);
window.setVisible(true);
}
}
This will properly display a vertical line of labels, beginning at the top and stretching as far towards the bottom as the labels take space. Good.
Modifying this, however, just a tiny bit:
public static void main(String[] args)
{
JFrame window = new JFrame();
Box box = new Box(BoxLayout.Y_AXIS);
for(int i = 0; i < 5; ++i)
{
JLabel label = new JLabel("XX");
JPanel panel = new JPanel();
panel.add(label);
box.add(panel);
}
box.add(Box.createVerticalGlue());
window.add(box);
window.setDefaultCloseOperation(JFrame.EXIT_ON_CLOSE);
window.setVisible(true);
}
This will stretch all components of the Box to the same height, placing the labels far away from each other. Bad.
Overriding the JPanel's getPreferredSize and getMaximumSize methods (with getMinimumSize) has no effect and would be a bad way to fix it, because it relied on the components rather than the container and its layout.
Addendum:
Here is an already pretty successful attempt using GroupLayout. Unfortunately it did not seem to occur to the designer that among DEFAULT_SIZE and PREFERRED_SIZE a choice MINIMUM_SIZE would have been a good idea.
Furthermore if it is possible to invert the sequence of GroupLayout.SequentialGroup, the API is no help to figure out how. I for one certainly have no clue how to even extend that class.
import java.awt.Component;
import java.awt.ComponentOrientation;
import java.awt.Container;
import javax.swing.GroupLayout;
import javax.swing.JFrame;
import javax.swing.JLabel;
import javax.swing.JPanel;
class LineLayout extends GroupLayout
{
public LineLayout(Container owner, int axis)
{
super(owner);
this.direction = axis;
this.direction |= owner.getComponentOrientation() != ComponentOrientation.LEFT_TO_RIGHT
? LineLayout.RIGHT_TO_LEFT : LineLayout.LEFT_TO_RIGHT;
this.setupGroups();
}
public LineLayout(Container owner, int axis, int orientation)
{
super(owner);
this.direction = axis;
this.direction |= orientation;
this.setupGroups();
}
#Override // to replicate FlowLayout functionality : this method is called from owner.add
public void addLayoutComponent(Component component, Object constraints)
{
if(constraints == null)
{
// REALLY surprised that this works, considering that overriding the JPanel's
// getMaximumSize method with getPreferredSize had no effect
this.horizontal.addComponent(component, GroupLayout.DEFAULT_SIZE,
GroupLayout.DEFAULT_SIZE,
GroupLayout.PREFERRED_SIZE);
this.vertical.addComponent (component, GroupLayout.DEFAULT_SIZE,
GroupLayout.DEFAULT_SIZE,
GroupLayout.PREFERRED_SIZE);
}
// TODO: else
}
protected void setupGroups()
{
super.setAutoCreateGaps(false); // does nothing
if((this.direction & LineLayout.AXIS) == LineLayout.Y_AXIS)
{
this.horizontal = super.createParallelGroup();
this.vertical = (this.direction & LineLayout.ORIENTATION) == LineLayout.RIGHT_TO_LEFT
? this.createSequentialInvertedGroup() : super.createSequentialGroup();
}
else
{
this.horizontal = (this.direction & LineLayout.ORIENTATION) == LineLayout.RIGHT_TO_LEFT
? this.createSequentialInvertedGroup() : super.createSequentialGroup();
this.vertical = super.createParallelGroup();
}
super.setHorizontalGroup(this.horizontal);
super.setVerticalGroup (this.vertical);
}
// How!?
// protected LineLayout.SequentialInvertedGroup createSequentialInvertedGroup() { return new LineLayout.SequentialInvertedGroup(); }
protected GroupLayout.SequentialGroup createSequentialInvertedGroup() { return super.createSequentialGroup(); } // placeholder
protected int direction;
protected GroupLayout.Group horizontal;
protected GroupLayout.Group vertical;
// not sure how reliable the constant field values of BoxLayout are, whether it's smart to assume them unchanging over the ages
public static final int AXIS = 0b1;
public static final int X_AXIS = 0b0; // = BoxLayout.X_AXIS;
public static final int Y_AXIS = 0b1; // = BoxLayout.Y_AXIS;
public static final int ORIENTATION = 0b10;
public static final int LEFT_TO_RIGHT = 0b00; // also top to bottom
public static final int RIGHT_TO_LEFT = 0b10; // also bottom to top
// No idea how; only has "add" methods; cannot actually do anything with the added components!?
//protected static class SequentialInvertedGroup extends GroupLayout.SequentialGroup
//{}
}
class Applikation
{
public static void main(String[] args)
{
JFrame window = new JFrame();
JPanel box = new JPanel();
box.setLayout(new LineLayout(box, LineLayout.Y_AXIS));
for(int i = 0; i < 5; ++i)
{
JLabel label = new JLabel("XX");
JPanel panel = new JPanel();
panel.add(label);
box.add(panel);
}
window.add(box);
window.setDefaultCloseOperation(JFrame.EXIT_ON_CLOSE);
window.setVisible(true);
}
}
If you try this out, you will note that there are still notable border spaces between the "XX" labels, taking up about 2/3 of an extra label per gap. While already much better than in the BoxLayout example, I do not think there is a good way to improve this spacing further.
private static int MAX_HEIGHT = 40;
private static final Dimension DIMENSION = new Dimension(Integer.MAX_VALUE, MAX_HEIGHT);
public static void main(String[] args)
{
JFrame window = new JFrame();
Box box = new Box(BoxLayout.Y_AXIS){
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
#Override
public Component add(Component comp) {
comp.setMaximumSize(DIMENSION);
return super.add(comp);
}
};
for(int i = 0; i < 5; ++i)
{
JLabel label = new JLabel("XX");
JPanel panel = new JPanel();
panel.add(label);
box.add(panel);
}
window.add(box);
window.setDefaultCloseOperation(JFrame.EXIT_ON_CLOSE);
window.pack();
window.setVisible(true);
}
You are using a Box for adding your components into. And the Documentation says:
a Box can use only a BoxLayout.
Now lets look into the Documentation for BoxLayout. It says:
BoxLayout pays attention to a component's requested minimum, preferred, and maximum sizes.
Now we have found the reason for the different outputs of your two examples. In your first example you are adding JLabels directly to your Box. Since they have a default maximumSize depending on their content they are not scaled by the Box.
In your second example you are adding JPanels to the Box that have your JLabels in it. A JPanel does not have a default maximumSize and so it is scaled by the Box.
So if you want to get the same output with JPanels as without you need your JPanels to have a maximumSize depending on their content means the JLabels.
So you could set a maximumSize manually. Something like that:
panel.setMaximumSize(new Dimension(100,20));
Or you use a different LayoutManager with your JPanels. One that calculates its size depending on its components. One that pays attention to a component's requested minimum, preferred, and maximum sizes.
Does this sound familiar to you? Right its from the Documentation of BoxLayout. So try to use a BoxLayout on your JPanels and you will get exactly the same result as your first example.
panel.setLayout(new BoxLayout(panel, BoxLayout.Y_AXIS));
I'm trying to make a simple game where you can set out tiles that make up a celtic design and I can't seem to make the buttons stay the same size. Here's the code:
public class CTGContent {
public static JPanel content = new JPanel();
private static JButton board[][] = new JButton[20][20];
static private Random random = new Random();
public static int CTGcolumn = random.nextInt(14)+1;
public static int CTGRow = 15;
private static GridLayout boardLayout;
public final int getBoardWidth(){
return CTGcolumn*40;
}
public final int getBoardHeight(){
return CTGRow*40;
}
public static void initializeBoard(){
int row = 0;
int column = 0;
int defaultCOL = 0;
int defaultROW = 0;
boardLayout = new GridLayout(CTGRow, CTGcolumn);
content.setLayout(boardLayout);
Random determine = new Random();
while (row < CTGRow){
column = 0;
while (column < CTGcolumn){
board[row][column] = new JButton(new ImageIcon("images\\template.gif"));
board[row][column].setPreferredSize(new Dimension(40, 40));
board[row][column].setMaximumSize(new Dimension(40, 40));
board[row][column].setMinimumSize(new Dimension(40, 40));
content.add(board[row][column]);
column++;
}
row++;
}
}
private static void build(){
initializeBoard();
JFrame window = new JFrame("testing the menubar");
window.setDefaultCloseOperation(JFrame.EXIT_ON_CLOSE);
window.setContentPane(content);
content.add(new JLabel("My Label"));
window.pack();
window.setVisible(true);
}
public CTGContent() {
}
public CTGContent(JFrame window){
initializeBoard();
window.add(content);
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
javax.swing.SwingUtilities.invokeLater( new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
build();
}
});
}
}
It starts off the right size usually but then for some reason if I resize the window or something they change size with it. I need them to stay the same size no matter what. How can I do that?
Change:
window.setContentPane(content);
To:
JPanel contentCenter = new JPanel(new GridBagLayout());
contentCenter.add(content);
window.setContentPane(contentCenter);
There are other ways to do it, like make the layout a FlowLayout, but the GBL will keep it nicely centered - both vertically and horizontally.
Tips
Please learn common Java naming conventions (specifically the case used for the names) for class, method & attribute names & use them consistently.
For better help sooner, post an MCVE. That code only needed import in order to make it an MCVE.
See also this answer to Centering a JLabel on a JPanel
You use GridLayout because of your buttons resize horisontally/vertically always to fill whole grid cell. To prevent that you can use another LayoutManager, for example GridBagLayout.
Always read about setting size to components.
I am building a small chess board for tactics, it would be a fun way to reflect upon on interests (programming and chess).
One problem I have currently face, although solved, is maintaining the board aspect ratio of 1:1.
The Board extends JPanel. Due to a problem with constraints, I have opted towards maintaining the board's physical size rather than it's rendered size. This would lead to faster operations when actually being used.
What I want it to look like, and have achieved:
The way I achieved this though seemed very hackish and is poor code by Skeet standards (thank you based Skeet).
public Frame() {
final JFrame frame = new JFrame("Chess");
final JPanel content = new JPanel(new BorderLayout());
final JPanel boardConfine = new JPanel(new BorderLayout());
final Board board = new Board();
boardConfine.addComponentListener(new ComponentAdapter() {
#Override
public void componentResized(ComponentEvent e) {
int min = Math.min(boardConfine.getWidth(), boardConfine.getHeight());
int xBuffer = (boardConfine.getWidth() - min) / 2;
int yBuffer = (boardConfine.getHeight() - min) / 2;
board.setBounds(xBuffer, yBuffer, min, min);
}
});
boardConfine.add(board, BorderLayout.CENTER);
content.setBackground(new Color(205, 205, 205));
content.add(boardConfine, BorderLayout.CENTER);
frame.setDefaultCloseOperation(WindowConstants.EXIT_ON_CLOSE);
frame.setContentPane(content);
frame.pack();
frame.setVisible(true);
}
As seen above, I manually set the board's size and location. Even I have stated exhaustively that this shouldn't ever be done, but I couldn't find a solution to work. I need the board to fill the maximum possible area, yet maintain the aspect ratio.
If there are any suggestions (either code or concepts) you can provide, I really thank you for taking the time to help me with this elitist conundrum.
Although not a complete solution, the example below scales the board to fill the smallest dimension of the enclosing container. Resize the frame to see the effect.
Addendum: The ideal solution would be Creating a Custom Layout Manager, where you have access to the enclosing container's geometry, and setBounds() can maintain the desired 1:1 aspect ratio. A variation of GridLayout may be suitable. Grid coordinates can be calculated directly, as shown here.
import java.awt.Color;
import java.awt.Dimension;
import java.awt.EventQueue;
import java.awt.Graphics;
import javax.swing.JFrame;
import javax.swing.JPanel;
/**
* #see https://stackoverflow.com/a/19531648/230513
*/
public class Test {
private static class MyPanel extends JPanel {
private static final int N = 8;
private static final int TILE = 48;
#Override
public Dimension getPreferredSize() {
return new Dimension(N * TILE, N * TILE);
}
#Override
protected void paintComponent(Graphics g) {
super.paintComponent(g);
g.setColor(Color.gray);
int w = this.getWidth();
int h = this.getHeight();
int tile = Math.min(w, h) / N;
for (int row = 0; row < N; row++) {
for (int col = 0; col < N; col++) {
if ((row + col) % 2 == 0) {
g.fillRect(col * tile, row * tile, tile, tile);
}
}
}
}
}
private void display() {
JFrame f = new JFrame("Test");
f.setDefaultCloseOperation(JFrame.EXIT_ON_CLOSE);
f.add(new MyPanel());
f.pack();
f.setLocationRelativeTo(null);
f.setVisible(true);
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
EventQueue.invokeLater(new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
new Test().display();
}
});
}
}
I've looked at many websites. Without the panels, the labels appear correctly, with the panels it give the the error:
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException
so what can I do to fix this?
here is the source code:
JLabel button[] = new JLabel[100];
JPanel[] panel = new JPanel[100];
for (int i = 0; i < button.length; i++) {
a = a + 50;
if (a > 549) {
b = b + 50;
a = 50;
}
button[i] = new JLabel("hi");
frame.add(button[i]); //is this necessary?
button[i].setVisible(true); // is this necessary?
button[i].setSize(50,50);
panel[i].add(button[i]);
panel[i].setVisible(true);
panel[i].setBounds(a, b, 50, 50);
frame.add(panel[i]);
}
Whats wrong with this, how can I fix it? just so you know, it should have 100 labels that say hi in a 10 by 10 array.
this is what it looks like:
Creating an array of JPanel only creates the array. It doesn't create any JPanel to fill the array. The arrays is thus filled with nulls. You must create a JPanel for each element of the array:
panel[i] = new JPanel();
panel[i].add(button[i]);
Moreover, a component may only have one ancestor. The button must be added to the frame or to the panel, but not both. If you want the button in the panel, it must be added to the panel.
Components are visible by default (except top-level ones like frames or dialogs which must be made visible). You don't need to call button.setVisible(true).
You should definitely learn to use layout managers rather than setting the size and bounds of your components explicitely. That's the only way to have good-looking, portable GUI apps. Read http://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/uiswing/layout/using.html
don't use frame.setLayout(null); use frame.setLayout(new GridLayout(10,10,10,10)); instead, for example
import java.awt.*;
import javax.swing.*;
public class CustomComponent1 extends JFrame {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
public CustomComponent1() {
setTitle("Custom Component Test / GridLayout");
setDefaultCloseOperation(JFrame.EXIT_ON_CLOSE);
}
public void display() {
setLayout(new GridLayout(10, 10, 10, 10));
for (int row = 0; row < 100; row++) {
add(new CustomComponents1());
}
//pack();
// enforces the minimum size of both frame and component
setMinimumSize(getMinimumSize());
setPreferredSize(getPreferredSize());
setVisible(true);
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
Runnable r = new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
CustomComponent1 main = new CustomComponent1();
main.display();
}
};
javax.swing.SwingUtilities.invokeLater(r);
}
}
class CustomComponents1 extends JLabel {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
#Override
public Dimension getMinimumSize() {
return new Dimension(20, 20);
}
#Override
public Dimension getPreferredSize() {
return new Dimension(20, 20);
}
#Override
public void paintComponent(Graphics g) {
int margin = 10;
Dimension dim = getSize();
super.paintComponent(g);
g.setColor(Color.red);
g.fillRect(margin, margin, dim.width - margin * 2, dim.height - margin * 2);
}
}