Develop Reference

Cleaner way to write code snippet

I'm new to java and I was wondering if there was an easier way to write
if(a == 10 || b == 10){
//stuff
}
In my mind I tried something like this:
if(a||b == 10){
//stuff
}
because IMO that makes a lot of intuitive sense, but it's not a thing.

if you're only comparing a few values then you might as well proceed with the current approach as there is nothing in place to make it shorter. However, if you're repeating your self many times, then you can create a helper function to do the work for you.
i.e
static boolean anyMatch(int comparisonValue, int... elements){
return Arrays.stream(elements)
.anyMatch(e -> e == comparisonValue);
}
then call it like so:
if(anyMatch(10, a, b)){ ... }

That's not going to work like that. You're checking the value of two variables against a value, which ends up being two checks, if(a == 10 || b == 10).
However, you can modify this check to this code:
if(Arrays.asList(a,b).contains(10))
It results in the same behavior, but this is neither shorter nor easier to read.

Yeah turns out there isn't a way to make it shorter.

No, we can't do it because in case of java, there is no option for comparison of variables like that.
Even you couldn't write like this
if(a||b){ //staff }
but if you would write then you will get this error message
error: bad operand types for binary operator '||'

Not shorter, but more "intuitively" readable:
boolean condA = (a == 10);
boolean condB = (b == 10);
if(condA || condA){
//stuff
}
always keep in mind, the goal isn't to write shortest possible code, but best maintainable code.

can you have two conditions in an if statement

I'm a beginner in coding. I was recently working with to create a chatting programme where a user will chat with my computer. Here is a part of the code:
System.out.println("Hello, what's our name? My name is " + answer4);
String a = scanner1.nextLine();
System.out.println("Ok, Hello, " + a + ", how was your day, good or bad?");
String b = scanner2.nextLine();
**if (b.equals("good"))** { //1
System.out.println("Thank goodness");
} else **if (b.equals("it was good"))** { //2
System.out.println("Thank goodness");
} else **if (b.equals("bad"))** { //3
System.out.println("Why was it bad?");
String c = scanner3.nextLine();
System.out.println("Don't worry, everything will be ok, ok?");
String d= scanner10.nextLine();
} else **if (b.equals("it was bad"))**{ //4
System.out.println("Why was it bad?");
String c = scanner3.nextLine();
System.out.println("Don't worry, everything will be ok, ok?");
String d= scanner10.nextLine();
}
if(age<18){System.out.println("How was school?");}
else if (age>=18){System.out.println("How was work?");}
The conditions of the if statements are in Bold (surrounded with **). In case of first and the second condition I want my application to do same thing. Similarly third and fourth condition. I thought it was possible to somehow group them in if statement.
I tried with below code but it doesn't compile:
if (b.equals("good"), b.equals("it was good")) {
System.out.println("Thank goodness");
} else if (b.equals("bad"),(b.equals("it was bad"))) {
System.out.println("Why was it bad?");
String c = scanner3.nextLine();
System.out.println("Don't worry, everything will be ok, ok?");
String d= scanner10.nextLine();
}
Can someone correct it for me?

You can use logical operators to combine your boolean expressions.
&& is a logical and (both conditions need to be true)
|| is a logical or (at least one condition needs to be true)
^ is a xor (exactly one condition needs to be true)
(== compares objects by identity)
For example:
if (firstCondition && (secondCondition || thirdCondition)) {
...
}
There are also bitwise operators:
& is a bitwise and
| is a bitwise or
^ is a xor
They are mainly used when operating with bits and bytes. However there is another difference, let's take again a look at this expression:
firstCondition && (secondCondition || thirdCondition)
If you use the logical operators and firstCondition evaluates to false then Java will not compute the second or third condition as the result of the whole logical expression is already known to be false. However if you use the bitwise operators then Java will not stop and continue computing everything:
firstCondition & (secondCondition | thirdCondition)

Here are some common symbols used in everyday language and their programming analogues:
"," usually refers to "and" in everyday language. Thus, this would translate to the AND operator, &&, in Java.
"/" usually refers to "or" in everyday language. Thus, this would translate to the OR operator, ||, in Java.
"XOR" is simply "x || y but both cannot be true at the same time". This translates to x ^ y in Java.
In your code, you probably meant to use "or" (you just used the incorrect "incorrect solution" :p), so you should use "||" in the second code block for it to become identical to the first code block.
Hope this helped :)

You're looking for the "OR" operator - which is normally represented by a double pipe: ||
if (b.equals("good") || b.equals("it was good")) {
System.out.println("Thank goodness");
} else if (b.equals("bad") || b.equals("it was bad")) {
System.out.println("Why was it bad?");
String c = scanner3.nextLine();
System.out.println("Don't worry, everything will be ok, ok?");
String d= scanner10.nextLine();
}

This is probably more answer than you need at this point. But, as several others already point out, you need the OR operator "||". There are a couple of points that nobody else has mentioned:
1) If (b.equals("good") || b.equals("it was good")) <-- If "b" is null here, you'll get a null pointer exception (NPE). If you are genuinely looking at hard-coded values, like you are here, then you can reverse the comparison. E.g.
if ("good".equals(b) || "it was good".equals(b))
The advantage of doing it this way is that the logic is precisely the same, but you'll never get an NPE, and the logic will work just how you expect.
2) Java uses "short-circuit" testing. Which in lay-terms means that Java stops testing conditions once it's sure of the result, even if all the conditions have not yet been tested. E.g.:
if((b != null) && (b.equals("good") || b.equals("it was good")))
You will not get an NPE in the code above because of short-circuit nature. If "b" is null, Java can be assured that no matter what the results of the next conditions, the answer will always be false. So it doesn't bother performing those tests.
Again, that's probably more information than you're prepared to deal with at this stage, but at some point in the near future the NPE of your test will bite you. :)

You can have two conditions if you use the double bars(||). They mean "Or". That means only ONE of your conditions has to be true for the loop to execute.
Something like this:
if(condition || otherCondition || anotherCondition) {
//code here
If you want all of conditions to be true use &&. This means that ALL conditions must be true in order for the loop to execute. if any one of them is false the loop will not execute.
Something like this:
if(condition && otherCondition && anotherCondition) {
//code here
You can also group conditions, if you want certain pairs of them to be true. something like:
if(condition || (otherCondition && anotherCondition)) {
//code here

There is a simpler way.
if (b.contains("good")) {
...
}
else if (b.contains("bad")) {
...
}

Java - Concise if statement

I really don't know what should be the title of this question, spent 10 minutes but this is the best I came up with.
The real question is very basic and I think I know the answer. But still, like the operator condition ? true-statement : false-statement, is there any shortcut of this kind of if statement?
if(intA == -1 || intB == -1 || intC == -1 || intD == -1 || intE == -1)
Suggestion: Something like this could be added in Java:
if((intA || intB || intC || intD || intE) == -1)

No.. There isn't. These are different variables with different values.
Suggestion: you can consider the all these variable necessary or not. If all these variables necessary there will be no way to simplify.

You should use lists for this purpose.
For ex.
You can implement function
findFirstEquals(List, Int)
which iterate through the list, search for first element that equals to second parameter and returns true if found.
In this case your if would be like following
intList = ArrayList<Int>()
// put 5, 6, 7,8 etc...
if findFirstEquals(intList, -1) ...

Afaik, there is no real shortcut syntax for this. Probably, you could do some tricks with logical and/or to achieve this, but I would not recommend to do so as it would be harder to read:
if (((intA | intB | intC) & -1) == -1)
You could still add those ints to an collection, and check if -1 is contained in that collection.
Fun fact: In Python, there is syntactic sugar for comparing a variable with 2 values; you can write 2 < a < 3, which would not be possible in Java. But personally, I do not know a language where syntactic sugar for what you are asking for exists.

You can use Switch() statement to make it more easy like below
public void myMethod(int intValue)
{
switch (intValue) {
case -1: //Your logic here ;
break;
case 1 : //Another condition
break;
default: //Default behaviour;
break;
}
}
Call method myMethod(yourValue) and passed your value to it.
Passed your integer value to switch it will handle it as per value you have passed.
May this will help you.

How to write nested ?: statements

I would like to shorten my code by the use of the ?: (if-else-then) comparative operator instead of using the traditional if{}else{} blocks that inconveniently tend to take over the screen. I was never taught about this operator, and I would greatly appreciate any help regarding how to nest multiple comparisons within one line.
This is the code that I would like to shorten:
if(y<0)
y=0;
else
if(y+h>s.getHeight())
y = s.getHeight()-h;
I managed to condense each condition to this (not nested):
y = (y<0) ? 0 : y;
y = (y+h>s.getHeight()) ? s.getHeight()-h : y;
Is this the correct way to nest it?
y = (y<0) ? 0 : ((y+h>s.getHeight()) ? s.getHeight()-h : y);
Thank you!
EDIT: I was given a link to another post pertaining to the ?: operator. Link. However, my question has to do with nesting instead of just a simple if statement. Therefore, my question is not a duplicate of that post.

Yes, this is correct syntax but it's not readable.
You can check by yourself this in Java. Like this:
int a = 3;
int b = 5;
String s = (a < b) ? "Less than b" : (a > b) ? "More than b" : "Equal as b";
System.out.println(s);
But code is much more readable if you use if and if else statements. This ? and : is just for basic if statement.
For example:
int a = 3;
int b = 5;
String s = (a == b) ? "Equal" : "Not equal"
System.out.println(s);
But even in this case, I would rather use if statement. I really don't like to see ? and : instead of if statement :)
Regards,
golobic

You have correctly used ternary operator. However you could have avoided repeated method invocations for s.getHeight().
y = y < 0 ? 0 : y+h > s.getHeight() ? s.getHeight() - h : y;
Use the ?: (ternary) operator instead of an if-then-else statement if that makes code more readable.
ex. result = someCondition ? value1 : value2;
This can be nested further if value1, value2 are also ternary expressions.

boolean operation trick

I've seen this before in code, but forgotten it. Basically it toggles a boolean variable. If it's true, it'll set to false and vice-versa. But unfortunately forgot the syntax.
It's basically a one liner for this:
if (myVar) {
myVar = false;
} else {
myVar = true;
}
It's something like this, but don't know what it's called or the correct syntax of it:
myVar = myVar : false ? true;

How about
myVar = !myVar
?

myVar = myVar ? false : true; is using the conditional operator.
You can just do this though
myVar = !myVar;

Another option is XOR:
myVar ^= true;
It's notable in that only the LHS of the assignment ever changes; the right side is constant and will toggle any boolean variable. Negation's more self-documenting IMO, though.

What you are thinking of is the conditional operator:
myVar = myVvar ? false : true;
(As you see, a lot of people call this "the ternary operator", but that only means that it is an operator with three operands. As it happens, there is only one operator with three operands in this language, but it still says nothing about what the operator does.)
It's of course easier to use the negation operator:
myVar = !myVar;

The smallest code I can think of at the moment. I don't know what its called (if it has a name, as you seem to suggest)
myVar = !myVar

What you're talking about is the "ternary" or "conditional" operator, which does an inline substitution as per a condition.
The syntax is:
condition ? trueValue : falseValue
I usually throw parentheses around my condition, sometimes around the whole conditional operator. Depends on how much I'm trying to delineate it from everything else.
So for example, suppose you want to return the larger of two numbers:
public int max(int a, int b)
{
return (a > b) ? a : b;
}
Notice that it can be substituted into the middle of something else.
Okay, now let's tackle your actual question about toggling a boolean type.
myVar = (myVar) ? false : true;
is how you would do it with the conditional operator. (Again, parentheses aren't required, I just favor them.)
But there's a simpler way to toggle the boolean... using the logical NOT ("!") operator:
myVar = !myVar;
Keep it simple. :-)

if(myVar == true)
{
myVar = false;
}
else if (myVar == false)
{
myVar = true;
}
else
{
myVar = FILE_NOT_FOUND
}

This also works :P
v=v?!v:!v;

There is a ternary operator (wikipedia). Which allows you to write a condensed if-else statement like in the second example.
In java:
myVar = (myVar) ? true : false;
There is also the NOT operator, which toggles a boolean variable. In java that is !. I believe that is what you want.
myVar = !myVar;

public boolean toggle(boolean bool)
{
return !bool;
}

I recently (on my own) found a similar answer to one already stated here. However, the simplest and shortest (non-repeating variable name with least code) answer is:
formControl.disabled ^= 1;
This works best in JavaScript when wanting to toggle boolean, DOM-based attributes (for example, a form control/input's disabled property -- going from a non-editable to edit state). After much searching (with no result that I liked) and some trial and error, I found my solution to be the simplest (however, true instead of a 1 would be clearer -- as was previously posted).
Since this syntax isn't very clear, immediately, I would not advise using it very often (I believe it is appropriate when the variable or property makes the context obvious). I have posted this response (instead of making it a comment) because the context in which the XOR bitwise self-assignment should be used is very important. This "trick" should mostly be avoided when considering best practices.

As others have noted, there are two ways to negate something: "lvalue = !lvalue;" and "lvalue ^= 1;". It's important to recognize the differences.
Saying "lvalue = !lvalue" will cause lvalue to be set to 1 if it was zero, and 0 if it was set to anything else. The lvalue will be evaluated twice; this is not a factor for simple variables, but saying "someArray[index1][index2][index3][index4] = !someArray[index1][index2][index3][index4]" could slow things down.
Saying "lvalue ^= 1;" will cause lvalue to be set to 1 if it was 0, 0 if it was 1, and something else if it was neither zero nor 1. The lvalue need only be specified or evaluated once, and if the value is known to be either zero or 1, this form is likely to be faster.
Too bad there's no auto-negate operator; there are times such a thing would be handy.

You can also use the binary form of negation as shown here.
if ((v == true) && !(v = false)) {
v != true; /* negate with true if true. */
} else {
v =! false; /* negate with false if false. */
}