I am using custom annotation with aspectj.
#TestLoggingAnnotation(setMessage = "I want to set value here")
public void get() {
String retString = null;
String message = "DEFAULT";
if (message == "DEFAULT") {
retString = "Default Logging";
} else {
retString = "Custom Logging";
}
}
The above is just simple and sample code. My requirement is that I want to pass the parameter value after resulting from method.
In my case I want set retString value to setMessage in custom parameter.
As of now, annotations can only take compile constants and cant be assigned values at runtime, though their value can be used at runtime using #Retention.
discussion follows here
#Target(ElementType.METHOD)
#Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
public #interface TestLoggingAnnotation{
String setMessage ();
}
now use reflection to extract and set method param i doubt we can do this with local varibles.
Related
What happens if I annotate a constructor parameter using #JsonProperty but the Json doesn't specify that property. What value does the constructor get?
How do I differentiate between a property having a null value versus a property that is not present in the JSON?
Summarizing excellent answers by Programmer Bruce and StaxMan:
Missing properties referenced by the constructor are assigned a default value as defined by Java.
You can use setter methods to differentiate between properties that are implicitly or explicitly set. Setter methods are only invoked for properties with explicit values. Setter methods can keep track of whether a property was explicitly set using a boolean flag (e.g. isValueSet).
What happens if I annotate a constructor parameter using #JsonProperty but the Json doesn't specify that property. What value does the constructor get?
For questions such as this, I like to just write a sample program and see what happens.
Following is such a sample program.
import org.codehaus.jackson.annotate.JsonProperty;
import org.codehaus.jackson.map.ObjectMapper;
public class JacksonFoo
{
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception
{
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
// {"name":"Fred","id":42}
String jsonInput1 = "{\"name\":\"Fred\",\"id\":42}";
Bar bar1 = mapper.readValue(jsonInput1, Bar.class);
System.out.println(bar1);
// output:
// Bar: name=Fred, id=42
// {"name":"James"}
String jsonInput2 = "{\"name\":\"James\"}";
Bar bar2 = mapper.readValue(jsonInput2, Bar.class);
System.out.println(bar2);
// output:
// Bar: name=James, id=0
// {"id":7}
String jsonInput3 = "{\"id\":7}";
Bar bar3 = mapper.readValue(jsonInput3, Bar.class);
System.out.println(bar3);
// output:
// Bar: name=null, id=7
}
}
class Bar
{
private String name = "BLANK";
private int id = -1;
Bar(#JsonProperty("name") String n, #JsonProperty("id") int i)
{
name = n;
id = i;
}
#Override
public String toString()
{
return String.format("Bar: name=%s, id=%d", name, id);
}
}
The result is that the constructor is passed the default value for the data type.
How do I differentiate between a property having a null value versus a property that is not present in the JSON?
One simple approach would be to check for a default value post deserialization processing, since if the element were present in the JSON but had a null value, then the null value would be used to replace any default value given the corresponding Java field. For example:
import org.codehaus.jackson.annotate.JsonAutoDetect.Visibility;
import org.codehaus.jackson.annotate.JsonMethod;
import org.codehaus.jackson.map.ObjectMapper;
public class JacksonFooToo
{
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception
{
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper().setVisibility(JsonMethod.FIELD, Visibility.ANY);
// {"name":null,"id":99}
String jsonInput1 = "{\"name\":null,\"id\":99}";
BarToo barToo1 = mapper.readValue(jsonInput1, BarToo.class);
System.out.println(barToo1);
// output:
// BarToo: name=null, id=99
// {"id":99}
String jsonInput2 = "{\"id\":99}";
BarToo barToo2 = mapper.readValue(jsonInput2, BarToo.class);
System.out.println(barToo2);
// output:
// BarToo: name=BLANK, id=99
// Interrogate barToo1 and barToo2 for
// the current value of the name field.
// If it's null, then it was null in the JSON.
// If it's BLANK, then it was missing in the JSON.
}
}
class BarToo
{
String name = "BLANK";
int id = -1;
#Override
public String toString()
{
return String.format("BarToo: name=%s, id=%d", name, id);
}
}
Another approach would be to implement a custom deserializer that checks for the required JSON elements. And yet another approach would be to log an enhancement request with the Jackson project at http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JACKSON
In addition to constructor behavior explained in #Programmer_Bruce's answer, one way to differentiate between null value and missing value is to define a setter: setter is only called with explicit null value.
Custom setter can then set a private boolean flag ("isValueSet" or whatever) if you want to keep track of values set.
Setters have precedence over fields, in case both field and setter exist, so you can "override" behavior this way as well.
I'm thinking of using something in the style of an Option class, where a Nothing object would tell me if there is such a value or not. Has anyone done something like this with Jackson (in Java, not Scala, et al)?
(My answer might be useful to some people finding this thread via google, even if it doesn't answer OPs question)
If you are dealing with primitive types which are omittable, and you do not want to use a setter like described in the other answers (for example if you want your field to be final), you can use box objects:
public class Foo {
private final int number;
public Foo(#JsonProperty Integer number) {
if (number == null) {
this.number = 42; // some default value
} else {
this.number = number;
}
}
}
this doesn't work if the JSON actually contains null, but it can be sufficient if you know it will only contain primitives or be absent
another option is to validate the object after deserialization either manually or via frameworks such java bean validation or, if you are using spring, the spring validation support.
I have the following variable annotated for data validation:
#Size(min=8, max=16, message="the size of the parameter must be between 8 and 16")
private String param;
However, the param can be null. It is required that it be 8-16 chars long only if it is not null. The problem I face is if the client app (JSON API) supplies an empty string, I want to treat it as though it were not supplied at all, i.e. is null. I was wondering if there is an elegant way to do this using the javax.validation annotations, i.e. convert an empty string to null, as opposed to the plain Java way the way I'm doing it right now:
public void setParameter(String _param) {
if(_param != null && !_param.trim().isEmpty()){
this.param = _param;
} else {
this.param = null;
}
}
I would like to have a very simple setter:
public void setParameter(String _param) {
this.param = _param;
}
and have the is-empty-string boilerplate done by an annotation. Is there a way to do it?
You could can implement your own custom constraint validator.
see here. I've used this many times and works like a charm.
https://docs.jboss.org/hibernate/validator/5.0/reference/en-US/html/validator-customconstraints.html
You would just need to set this condition (if null return "" or vice-versa) in the isValid method.
Maybe title "can annotation get context object?" is not correct, but I don't know how to give it a right and clear one.
I use Spring AOP + Java Annotation to save log, here is my code:
CategoryAction.java :
#ServiceTracker(methodDesp="save category, category name:"+this.category.getName())
public String save() throws Exception
{
this.categoryService.save(this.category);
this.setJsonDataSimply(null);
return "save";
}
TrackAdvice.java :
public Object trackAround(ProceedingJoinPoint point) throws Throwable
{
String log = "success";
ServiceTracker tracker = null;
Method method = null;
AbstractAction action = null;
try
{
Object result = point.proceed();
action = (AbstractAction) point.getTarget();
MethodSignature signature = (MethodSignature) point.getSignature();
method = signature.getMethod();
tracker = method.getAnnotation(ServiceTracker.class);
return result;
}
catch (Exception e)
{
log = e.getMessage();
throw e;
}
finally
{
if (tracker != null)
{
String userId = (String) ActionContext.getContext().getSession().get(Constant.USERID);
if (userId == null)
{
userId = "unknown";
}
TrackLog t = new TrackLog();
t.setWhen(new Date());
t.setUserId(userId);
t.setResult(log);
t.setMethodName(action.getClass().getCanonicalName() + "." + method.getName());
t.setMethodDesp(tracker.methodDesp());
this.trackService.save(t);
}
}
}
ServiceTracker is my own annotation, in my TrackAdvice class, I get the current executing method, if the method has a ServiceTracker annotation, then save the methodDesp in annotation to database.
Now the question is the methodDesp in annotation is dynamic, I want to get this object and retrieve its category property.
It seems that Java Annotation doesn't support this, maybe it supports but I don't know how.
What you can do is use some sort of expression language in the annotation value and then run some interpreter in your advice code. One example using SPEL could look like this:
#ServiceTracker(methodDesp="save category, category name: #{category.name}")
And in your advice code, you can then extract the expression token, make use of a SpelExpression and pass it the target reference as root object (you may want to check what's available out of the box in the SPEL API for supporting your use-case(s)).
It seems that Java Annotation doesn't support this
You are correct - there is no way to do this in pure java.
The reason is that because annotations are static metadata that is wired into classes and defined at compile-time (this start to exist only at run-time, not compile-time).
In other words there is no straightforward way to make methodDesp of some annotated method of some class dynamic, since it's value has to be resolved statically, at compile-time.
However, technically there is a way to do something like you want. What I talk about is using javassist to either manipulate or create your classes (and annotations applied to them) at runtime. But be warned that this is rather hacky way and I generally would not recommend to go there.
This question is a follow up to a question I found before
java: get all variable names in a class
What I want is to get variables from a class, but instead of getting them all, I want only the variables that have the annotation #isSearchable .
So basically I have 2 questions :
How do I create an annotation ?
How to filter my fields by only this annotation ?
And one more thing , if it is something I'm using frequently is it advisable (I'm guessing reflections should be slow).
Thank you
/** Annotation declaration */
#Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
#Target(ElementType.FIELD)
public #interface isSearchable{
//...
}
#isSearchable
public String anyField = "any value";
checking like:
//use MyClass.class.getDeclaredFields() if you want the fields only for this class.
//.getFields() returns the fields for all the class hierarchy
for(Field field : MyClass.class.getFields()){
isSearchable s = field.getAnnotation(isSearchable.class);
if (s != null) {
//field has the annotation isSearchable
} else {
//field has not the annotation
}
}
Here is an example
class Test {
#IsSearchable
String str1;
String str2;
#Target(ElementType.FIELD)
#Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
#interface IsSearchable {
}
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
for (Field f : Test.class.getDeclaredFields()) {
if (f.getAnnotation(IsSearchable.class) != null) {
System.out.println(f);
}
}
}
}
prints
java.lang.String Test.str1
How to filter my fields by only this annotation ?
You can get by this simple snippet
Field field = ... //obtain field object
Annotation[] annotations = field.getDeclaredAnnotations();
for(Annotation annotation : annotations){
if(annotation instanceof IsSearchable){
MyAnnotation myAnnotation = (MyAnnotation) annotation;
System.out.println("name: " + myAnnotation.name());
System.out.println("value: " + myAnnotation.value());
}
}
In the above snippet you are basically filtering only IsSearchable annotations.
Regarding your one more thing query
Yes reflection will be slow as discussed here, if its possible to avoid, would advise you to avoid.
Field.getDeclaredAnnotations() gives you the annotations for each field.
To answer your supplementary question, I would normally expect reflection to be slow. Having said that, I perhaps wouldn't worry about optimising until this becomes a problem for you.
Hint: Make sure you're checking the up-to-date Javadoc. Google tends to give me Java 1.4 Javadocs, and annotations didn't exist prior to Java 5.
I can generate annotation class using JCodeModel exept one thing.
I can't understand how to add this to annotation:
#Target(value={METHOD,TYPE,CONSTRUCTOR})
How to set array of defined values as value of value method?
I can use param() method of JAnnotationUse class for simple annotations, but how to set array as value I can't find.
Make something similar to this:
JAnnotationUse annotation = (JClass/JMethod/JFieldVar).annotate(Class<? extends java.lang.annotation.Annotation> MyAnnotation.class);
// Check if the value of the parameter of the annotation is an Array.
if (paramAnnotationValue.getClass().isArray()) {
Object[] paramAnnotationValueArray = (Object[]) paramAnnotationValue;
JAnnotationArrayMember annotationArrayMember = annotation.paramArray("parameter");
for (Object paramValue : paramAnnotationValueArray) {
annotationArrayMember.param((String/Boolean/Class/JType) paramValue);
}
}
// No Array is normal.
else {
(...)
}
Something like this is generated:
#MyAnnotation(parameter = {
"value_a",
"value_b"
})