I have a value like this:
"Foo Bar" "Another Value" something else
What regex will return the values enclosed in the quotation marks (e.g. Foo Bar and Another Value)?
In general, the following regular expression fragment is what you are looking for:
"(.*?)"
This uses the non-greedy *? operator to capture everything up to but not including the next double quote. Then, you use a language-specific mechanism to extract the matched text.
In Python, you could do:
>>> import re
>>> string = '"Foo Bar" "Another Value"'
>>> print re.findall(r'"(.*?)"', string)
['Foo Bar', 'Another Value']
I've been using the following with great success:
(["'])(?:(?=(\\?))\2.)*?\1
It supports nested quotes as well.
For those who want a deeper explanation of how this works, here's an explanation from user ephemient:
([""']) match a quote; ((?=(\\?))\2.) if backslash exists, gobble it, and whether or not that happens, match a character; *? match many times (non-greedily, as to not eat the closing quote); \1 match the same quote that was use for opening.
I would go for:
"([^"]*)"
The [^"] is regex for any character except '"'
The reason I use this over the non greedy many operator is that I have to keep looking that up just to make sure I get it correct.
Lets see two efficient ways that deal with escaped quotes. These patterns are not designed to be concise nor aesthetic, but to be efficient.
These ways use the first character discrimination to quickly find quotes in the string without the cost of an alternation. (The idea is to discard quickly characters that are not quotes without to test the two branches of the alternation.)
Content between quotes is described with an unrolled loop (instead of a repeated alternation) to be more efficient too: [^"\\]*(?:\\.[^"\\]*)*
Obviously to deal with strings that haven't balanced quotes, you can use possessive quantifiers instead: [^"\\]*+(?:\\.[^"\\]*)*+ or a workaround to emulate them, to prevent too much backtracking. You can choose too that a quoted part can be an opening quote until the next (non-escaped) quote or the end of the string. In this case there is no need to use possessive quantifiers, you only need to make the last quote optional.
Notice: sometimes quotes are not escaped with a backslash but by repeating the quote. In this case the content subpattern looks like this: [^"]*(?:""[^"]*)*
The patterns avoid the use of a capture group and a backreference (I mean something like (["']).....\1) and use a simple alternation but with ["'] at the beginning, in factor.
Perl like:
["'](?:(?<=")[^"\\]*(?s:\\.[^"\\]*)*"|(?<=')[^'\\]*(?s:\\.[^'\\]*)*')
(note that (?s:...) is a syntactic sugar to switch on the dotall/singleline mode inside the non-capturing group. If this syntax is not supported you can easily switch this mode on for all the pattern or replace the dot with [\s\S])
(The way this pattern is written is totally "hand-driven" and doesn't take account of eventual engine internal optimizations)
ECMA script:
(?=["'])(?:"[^"\\]*(?:\\[\s\S][^"\\]*)*"|'[^'\\]*(?:\\[\s\S][^'\\]*)*')
POSIX extended:
"[^"\\]*(\\(.|\n)[^"\\]*)*"|'[^'\\]*(\\(.|\n)[^'\\]*)*'
or simply:
"([^"\\]|\\.|\\\n)*"|'([^'\\]|\\.|\\\n)*'
Peculiarly, none of these answers produce a regex where the returned match is the text inside the quotes, which is what is asked for. MA-Madden tries but only gets the inside match as a captured group rather than the whole match. One way to actually do it would be :
(?<=(["']\b))(?:(?=(\\?))\2.)*?(?=\1)
Examples for this can be seen in this demo https://regex101.com/r/Hbj8aP/1
The key here is the the positive lookbehind at the start (the ?<= ) and the positive lookahead at the end (the ?=). The lookbehind is looking behind the current character to check for a quote, if found then start from there and then the lookahead is checking the character ahead for a quote and if found stop on that character. The lookbehind group (the ["']) is wrapped in brackets to create a group for whichever quote was found at the start, this is then used at the end lookahead (?=\1) to make sure it only stops when it finds the corresponding quote.
The only other complication is that because the lookahead doesn't actually consume the end quote, it will be found again by the starting lookbehind which causes text between ending and starting quotes on the same line to be matched. Putting a word boundary on the opening quote (["']\b) helps with this, though ideally I'd like to move past the lookahead but I don't think that is possible. The bit allowing escaped characters in the middle I've taken directly from Adam's answer.
The RegEx of accepted answer returns the values including their sourrounding quotation marks: "Foo Bar" and "Another Value" as matches.
Here are RegEx which return only the values between quotation marks (as the questioner was asking for):
Double quotes only (use value of capture group #1):
"(.*?[^\\])"
Single quotes only (use value of capture group #1):
'(.*?[^\\])'
Both (use value of capture group #2):
(["'])(.*?[^\\])\1
-
All support escaped and nested quotes.
I liked Eugen Mihailescu's solution to match the content between quotes whilst allowing to escape quotes. However, I discovered some problems with escaping and came up with the following regex to fix them:
(['"])(?:(?!\1|\\).|\\.)*\1
It does the trick and is still pretty simple and easy to maintain.
Demo (with some more test-cases; feel free to use it and expand on it).
PS: If you just want the content between quotes in the full match ($0), and are not afraid of the performance penalty use:
(?<=(['"])\b)(?:(?!\1|\\).|\\.)*(?=\1)
Unfortunately, without the quotes as anchors, I had to add a boundary \b which does not play well with spaces and non-word boundary characters after the starting quote.
Alternatively, modify the initial version by simply adding a group and extract the string form $2:
(['"])((?:(?!\1|\\).|\\.)*)\1
PPS: If your focus is solely on efficiency, go with Casimir et Hippolyte's solution; it's a good one.
A very late answer, but like to answer
(\"[\w\s]+\")
http://regex101.com/r/cB0kB8/1
The pattern (["'])(?:(?=(\\?))\2.)*?\1 above does the job but I am concerned of its performances (it's not bad but could be better). Mine below it's ~20% faster.
The pattern "(.*?)" is just incomplete. My advice for everyone reading this is just DON'T USE IT!!!
For instance it cannot capture many strings (if needed I can provide an exhaustive test-case) like the one below:
$string = 'How are you? I\'m fine, thank you';
The rest of them are just as "good" as the one above.
If you really care both about performance and precision then start with the one below:
/(['"])((\\\1|.)*?)\1/gm
In my tests it covered every string I met but if you find something that doesn't work I would gladly update it for you.
Check my pattern in an online regex tester.
This version
accounts for escaped quotes
controls backtracking
/(["'])((?:(?!\1)[^\\]|(?:\\\\)*\\[^\\])*)\1/
MORE ANSWERS! Here is the solution i used
\"([^\"]*?icon[^\"]*?)\"
TLDR;
replace the word icon with what your looking for in said quotes and voila!
The way this works is it looks for the keyword and doesn't care what else in between the quotes.
EG:
id="fb-icon"
id="icon-close"
id="large-icon-close"
the regex looks for a quote mark "
then it looks for any possible group of letters thats not "
until it finds icon
and any possible group of letters that is not "
it then looks for a closing "
I liked Axeman's more expansive version, but had some trouble with it (it didn't match for example
foo "string \\ string" bar
or
foo "string1" bar "string2"
correctly, so I tried to fix it:
# opening quote
(["'])
(
# repeat (non-greedy, so we don't span multiple strings)
(?:
# anything, except not the opening quote, and not
# a backslash, which are handled separately.
(?!\1)[^\\]
|
# consume any double backslash (unnecessary?)
(?:\\\\)*
|
# Allow backslash to escape characters
\\.
)*?
)
# same character as opening quote
\1
string = "\" foo bar\" \"loloo\""
print re.findall(r'"(.*?)"',string)
just try this out , works like a charm !!!
\ indicates skip character
Unlike Adam's answer, I have a simple but worked one:
(["'])(?:\\\1|.)*?\1
And just add parenthesis if you want to get content in quotes like this:
(["'])((?:\\\1|.)*?)\1
Then $1 matches quote char and $2 matches content string.
All the answer above are good.... except they DOES NOT support all the unicode characters! at ECMA Script (Javascript)
If you are a Node users, you might want the the modified version of accepted answer that support all unicode characters :
/(?<=((?<=[\s,.:;"']|^)["']))(?:(?=(\\?))\2.)*?(?=\1)/gmu
Try here.
My solution to this is below
(["']).*\1(?![^\s])
Demo link : https://regex101.com/r/jlhQhV/1
Explanation:
(["'])-> Matches to either ' or " and store it in the backreference \1 once the match found
.* -> Greedy approach to continue matching everything zero or more times until it encounters ' or " at end of the string. After encountering such state, regex engine backtrack to previous matching character and here regex is over and will move to next regex.
\1 -> Matches to the character or string that have been matched earlier with the first capture group.
(?![^\s]) -> Negative lookahead to ensure there should not any non space character after the previous match
echo 'junk "Foo Bar" not empty one "" this "but this" and this neither' | sed 's/[^\"]*\"\([^\"]*\)\"[^\"]*/>\1</g'
This will result in: >Foo Bar<><>but this<
Here I showed the result string between ><'s for clarity, also using the non-greedy version with this sed command we first throw out the junk before and after that ""'s and then replace this with the part between the ""'s and surround this by ><'s.
From Greg H. I was able to create this regex to suit my needs.
I needed to match a specific value that was qualified by being inside quotes. It must be a full match, no partial matching could should trigger a hit
e.g. "test" could not match for "test2".
reg = r"""(['"])(%s)\1"""
if re.search(reg%(needle), haystack, re.IGNORECASE):
print "winning..."
Hunter
If you're trying to find strings that only have a certain suffix, such as dot syntax, you can try this:
\"([^\"]*?[^\"]*?)\".localized
Where .localized is the suffix.
Example:
print("this is something I need to return".localized + "so is this".localized + "but this is not")
It will capture "this is something I need to return".localized and "so is this".localized but not "but this is not".
A supplementary answer for the subset of Microsoft VBA coders only one uses the library Microsoft VBScript Regular Expressions 5.5 and this gives the following code
Sub TestRegularExpression()
Dim oRE As VBScript_RegExp_55.RegExp '* Tools->References: Microsoft VBScript Regular Expressions 5.5
Set oRE = New VBScript_RegExp_55.RegExp
oRE.Pattern = """([^""]*)"""
oRE.Global = True
Dim sTest As String
sTest = """Foo Bar"" ""Another Value"" something else"
Debug.Assert oRE.test(sTest)
Dim oMatchCol As VBScript_RegExp_55.MatchCollection
Set oMatchCol = oRE.Execute(sTest)
Debug.Assert oMatchCol.Count = 2
Dim oMatch As Match
For Each oMatch In oMatchCol
Debug.Print oMatch.SubMatches(0)
Next oMatch
End Sub
I have the following regex and sample input:
http://regex101.com/r/xK9dE3
As you can see it matching the first "yo". I only want the pattern to match on the same line (the second "yo") pattern with "cut me".
How can I make sure that the regex match is only on the same line?
Output:
Hi
Expected Output (this is what I really want):
Hi
yo keep this here
Keep this here
You can use this regex with s (DOTALL) regex flag:
^.*?(?=yo\b[^\n]*cut me:)
Online Demo: http://regex101.com/r/oV3eP7
yo\b[^\n]*cut me: is lookahead pattern that makes sure that yo with word boundary and cut me: are matched in the same line.
Remove the s or DOTALL flag and change your regex to the following:
^.*?((\yo\b.*?(cut me:)[\s\S]*))
With the DOTALL flag enabled . will match newline characters, so your match can span multiple lines including lines before yo or between yo and cut me. By removing this flag you can ensure that you only match the line with both yo and cut me, and then change the .* at the end to [\s\S]* which will match any character including newlines so that you can match to the end of the string.
http://regex101.com/r/sX2kL0
edit: Note that this takes a slightly different approach than the other answer, this will match the portion of the string that you want deleted so you can replace this portion with an empty string to remove it.
I've following pattern:
Claims(40)
This is good.
This is good, too.
Description
This is description.
The delimiter strings in this case are:
1st delimiter: "Claims(40)"
2nd delimiter: "Description"
I want to extract text between these delimiters while excluding the delimiters.
Also, in the above text, following rules exist:
1st delimiter starts on the 1st column in the text and it's the only word on the line.
In the first delimiter, opening parenthesis, combination of digits, and closing parenthesis may be absent. However, combination of digits and closing parenthesis exist if does the opening parenthesis.
2nd delimiter starts on the 1st column in the text and it's the only word on the line.
My regular expression:
String regxStr = "^Claims(\\(\\d+\\)?)$(.*?)^Description$";
This doesn't work.
I tried a lot many other regx, but none did work. So finally, I resorted applying brute-force approach with the regex:
String regxStr = "Claims(.*?)Description";
But neither of the regx is working. I am not being able to figure out what's and where the regx is going wrong.
I'm using Matcher class and find() method of Matcher class for further processing.
Please help me.
This captures the text you want, although I'm not totally clear on your requirements for the (40) part. #lovetostrike's answer addresses that.
\bClaims(?:\(\d+\))?\s+(.+?)\s+Description\b
You must activate the DOTALL flag when compiling the pattern:
Pattern.compile(regxStr, Pattern.DOTALL)
Escaped in a Java string:
"\\bClaims(?:\\(\\d+\\))?\\s+(.+?)\\s+Description\\b"
Here's a one-line solution:
String target = input.relaceAll(".*Claims(\\(\\d+\\))?\\s+(.*?)Description.*", "$1");
Also in addition to #aliteralmind answer, Regex isn't a good tool for nested structure, i.e. matching paren pairs. But in your simple case, you can use the OR, '|', operator in your pattern. The outer parens are used to separate the two groups for OR operator, first part with parens, and the second without parens.
(\\(\\d+\\)|\\d+)
I'm trying to extract the string preceding a specific character (even when character is repeated, like this (ie: underscore '_'):
this_is_my_example_line_0
this_is_my_example_line_1_
this_is_my_example_line_2___
_this_is_my_ _example_line_3_
__this_is_my___example_line_4__
and after running my regex I should get this (the regex should ignore the any instances of the matching character in the middle of the string):
this_is_my_example_line_0
this_is_my_example_line_1
this_is_my_example_line_2
this_is_my_ _example_line_3
this_is_my___example_line_4
In other words I'm trying to 'trim' the matched character(s) at the beginning and end of string.
I'm trying to use a Regex in Java to accomplish this, my idea is to capture the group of characters between the special character(s) at the end or beginning of the line.
So far I can only do this successfully for example 3 with this regexp:
/[^_]+|_+(.*)[_$]+|_$+/
[^_]+ not 'underscore' once or more
| OR
_+ underscore once or more
(.*) capture all characters
[_$]+ not 'underscore' once or more followed by end of line
|_$+ OR 'underscore' once or more followed by end of line
I just realized that this excludes the first word of the message on example 0,1,2 since the string doesn't start with underscore and it only starts matching after finding a underscore..
Is there an easier way not involving regex?
I don't really care about the first character (although it would be nice) I only need to ignore the repeating character at the end.. it looks that (by this regex tester) just doing this, would work? /()_+$/ the empty parenthesis matches anything before a single or repeting matches at the end of the line.. would that be correct?
Thank you!
There are a couple of options here, you could either replace matches of ^_+|_+$ with an empty string, or extract the contents of the first capture group from the match of ^_*(.*?)_*$. Note that if your strings may be multiple lines and you want to perform the replacement on each line then you will need to use the Pattern.MULTILINE flag for either approach. If your strings may be multiple lines and you only want to replacement to occur at the very beginning and end, don't use Pattern.MULTILINE but use Pattern.DOTALL for the second approach.
For example: http://regexr.com?355ff
How about [^_\n\r](.*[^_\n\r])??
Demo
String data=
"this_is_my_example_line_0\n" +
"this_is_my_example_line_1_\n" +
"this_is_my_example_line_2___\n" +
"_this_is_my_ _example_line_3_\n" +
"__this_is_my___example_line_4__";
Pattern p=Pattern.compile("[^_\n\r](.*[^_\n\r])?");
Matcher m=p.matcher(data);
while(m.find()){
System.out.println(m.group());
}
output:
this_is_my_example_line_0
this_is_my_example_line_1
this_is_my_example_line_2
this_is_my_ _example_line_3
this_is_my___example_line_4
I´m not a programmer, so my level is newie in this field. I must create a regular expression to check two lines. Between these two lines A and B could be one, two or more different lines.
I´ve been reviewing link http://docs.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/util/regex/Pattern.html but i´ve not reach the solution, althouth i think that i´m very close to the solution.
I am testing the expression
^(.*$)
and this gets an entire line. If i write this expression twice it gets two lines. So it seems that this expression is getting as entire lines as occurrences of the expression.
But, i would like to check undetermined lines between A and B. I know that at least it will be one line
If i write ^(.*$){1,} it doesn´t work.
Anyone knows which could be the mistake?
Thank you for your time
Andres
DOT . in regex matches any character except newline character.
You're looking for DOTALL or s flag here that makes dot match any character including newline character as well. So if you want to match all the lines between literals A and B then use this regex:
(?s)A.*?B
(?s) is for DOTALL that will make .*? match all the characters including newline characters between A and B.
? is to make above regex non-greedy.
Read More: http://docs.oracle.com/javase/1.5.0/docs/api/java/util/regex/Pattern.html
Why don't you use Scanner ? It might be more related to what you want:
Scanner sc = new ...
while (sc.nextLine().compareTo(strB)!=0) {
whatYouWantToDo
}
You could try to search for line terminators \r and \n. Depending on the source of the file you maybe have to experiment a bit.
As far as I understood it, you want to match the lines, with at least one empty line in between? Try ^(.*)$\n{2,}^(.*)$
If you want to find two equal lines, using regex:
Pattern pattern = Pattern.compile("^(?:.*\n)*(.*\n)(?:.*\n)*\\1");
// Skip some lines, find a line, skip some lines, find the first group `(...)`
Matcher m = pattern.matcher(text);
while (m.find()) {
System.out.println("Double: " + m.group(1);
}
The (?: ...) is a non-capturing group; that is, not available through m.group(#).
However this won't find line B in: "A\nB\nA\nB\n".