I check out a java project from svn repository include .classpath and .project files. And I import these codes into eclipse. But the eclipse will modify the content of .classpath file. How can I stop eclipse to do this? just write off build automatically option?
You can't. But instead of putting a JAR on the Java build path you could
choose an execution environment which should stay stable when you change
the JRE and hence the .classpath file will not change either.
.Project and .classpath files should not be checked in under svn repos.Blindly copying such files from one machine to another may be risky. These are the files that eclipse automatically constructs for you as per your project structure. If you want to edit, you can do that.
Here is the nice explanation What's in an Eclipse .classpath/.project file?
Adding information to a 2-year old question just in case of any one else is stumbling across this.
Due to insufficient detail in the original question, I am guessing that the problem experienced is due to the project's classpath pointing to a different location on the questioner's machine as on the original project author's machine. When a project uses 3rd party libraries (JARs) and is shared between different team members (as hinted at by the use of a version control tool), this is a common occurrence.
A solution to this would be to have all team members set up the location of the directory containing all 3rd party JARs to have an identical structure on all individual machines. So instead of changing the classpath, change the directory structure to that required by the classpath.
Unfortunately this is not always the best solution:
Team members may have different operating systems (Windows vs Linux) and you will not be able to have a (absolute) class path that works on all platforms (e.g. C:\libraries\3rdparty.jar vs /opt/libs/3rdparty.jar)
Team members may differ in how they prefer to organize their directory structure. Especially, if a team member places libraries into his home directory (e.g. C:\User\abcd\libraries\3rdparty.jar or /usr/abcd/libs/3rdparty.jar), another team member will struggle to replicate that directory structure.
Eclipse provides various methods to set up a project so that it can easily be shared between team members. These however require team members to all agree on the convention, and will be slightly easier if set up by the original project author right from the start. Two methods most commonly used:
Add all third-party libraries to the project itself (the usual convention is to have a /lib directory inside the project for this - on the same level as /src and /bin etc.). The classpath can now be set up to be relative to the project's root and thus usable across different setups. A variation for large multi-project-file projects would be to have a separate eclipse project containing the libraries, then add it to other projects as a dependency ("Required projects on the build path" in the "Java Build Path" dialog).
This has the benefit of being able to version control your JARs too. However, it may use up a lot of extra storage/bandwith, so may not always be desirable. For instance, I would not do this with Java Enterprise Edition JARs contained in my preferred Application Server distribution, as I may want to migrate my project in future to a new version or another product, without such dependencies - I also do not want to have my project saddled with duplicate JARs that are in any case already available in the AS distribution. So you need to think through your requirements.
Eclipse also provides the concept of a classpath variable. This may be set up to point to the root of a team member's JAR-containing directory, and be extended with subdirectories and filenames inside the classpath. This needs to be done only once, and is also accessed via the "Java Build Path" dialog.
Whenever a new team member uses the project for the first time, he needs to configure eclipse (once) to point that variable to the relevant path on his own machine.
The above mechanisms are explained in more detail on various web pages, here is one reference: http://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=367962
Related
I'm using Netbeans 12 with Ant to build my apps. The default folder for libraries is 'lib'. Is there any simple and straightforward way to change it? For example I need to put my libraries in the same folder together with my main .jar when building.
I've checked some older related questions here, but answers were either too complicated or not actual anymore (provided links not working etc.)
Using the NetBeans Project Wizard, select File > New Project > Java with Ant > Java Application, and click Next>.
The wizard screen will include a checkbox labeled Use Dedicated Folder for Storing Libraries. To change the default folder for libraries check that box, and then the following field labelled Libraries Folder will become enabled. You can replace the default value of .\lib with your own directory. For example:
You can use the same approach when creating web applications and enterprise applications. The field settings are sticky, so be sure to check that the values remain appropriate when creating subsequent projects.
I couldn't find any NetBeans 12 documentation on this, but the NetBeans 8.2 documentation remains valid. See section 6.6 Sharing a Library with Other Users for details:
You can configure most standard Java SE, Web, and Enterprise projects
in a way that makes it easy to share libraries with other users. You
can specify a location for libraries on which the project relies. You
can also specify how the libraries are referenced from your project...
Note that this approach will not put (what you called) main.jar in the specified libraries folder. That will still be placed directly under the dist directory. If you want to change that behavior I think you might need to modify some NetBeans Ant script(s).
The IntelliJ 2017.2 documentation suggests including the .idea folder that contains that IDE’s own configuration files (excepting the workspace.xml and tasks.xml files). I can understand the sense in this, as I could incorrectly configure the project settings and want to revert.
Yet, I want to post this open-source multi-module Maven-driven project to BitBucket for public access. Obviously, not everybody uses IntelliJ as their IDE, so I do not want to force my IDE settings on them.
➠ How do open-source authors resolve this conundrum?
My suggestion that comes from experience is to always explicitly ignore (that is, add to .hgignore or .gitignore) IDE configuration files or directories.
It is not only a question of not spamming a project with configuration files for a specific IDE. The real problem begins when more that one person uses the same IDE. Depending on the IDE and on how it is configured, you can fall in a situation where each commit contains changes to these files, and will confuse all the other developer using the same IDE, which in turn will overwrite the changes again in a infinite loop.
Some of your IDE settings will be global and stored in your home directory. The ones that are project specific will survive as long as you don't change the local directory in which you cloned the repo. If you change directory, in my experience it is always tolerable to reconfigure the IDE. There are at least two situations when the local directory changes: (1) you remove the directory and clone the repository again (2) you use more than one computer.
If you are concerned for things like coding style, then the best approach is to use a command-line formatter tool that works for any editor or IDE. That tool will have its configuration file committed in the repo, since coding style is something that should be equal for all developers and files of a repo.
I saw that in Eclipse I can define User Libraries - to make setting the classpath easier (and probably for other reasons as well).
The problem is, that these libraries are only available in the workspace, and if I want other people using the same project to use them - I need to export my user library and they need to import it.
Is there any functionality like this on the project level? I basically need to have a 'classpath group' - can it be done?
If not, is there an automatic way to auto import the user library to the workspace when importing the project?
I'm using Eclipse 3.6.
JDT has the 2 concepts, user libraries and classpath variables. In the classpath variable, you can add jars to your project. Other team members have to fill in the variables in their workspace so their classpath is complete. This is useful when external jars might be in different locations on each team members local file system.
The USER_LIBRARY is a container for adding a logical group of local jars all at once. For example, the JRE_LIB container represents a number of local jars. But as you've seen, it points to a local set of jars meant to be used in multiple projects (as the JRE is added to multiple projects).
Aside from export/import (which you're already doing), I don't believe you can check CLASS_LIBRARIES into a project's SCM. If there was, the preference page would have a "Configure Project specific settings" link at the top.
Your best bet is to simply add the jars to the project, so they'll be included in the SCM. If they can be in different locations depending on the rest of your team, then use a classpath variable so it can be set in each workspace. That's the least amount of hassle as far as team members checking out the project and being ready to go.
The best way IMO is to use m2eclipse - Maven plugin for eclipse. In Maven all the dependencies are defined in pom.xml and downloaded automatically as needed. This means that the only thing you share with your team is pom.xml - your project definition.
There is a lot more advantages when using m2eclipse vs standard eclipse approch. More information is at http://www.sonatype.com/books/m2eclipse-book/reference/
The way I have used user libraries is for something like Ant. Define a user library "ant" for all the jars in ANT_HOME/lib. If including this in your Eclipse .classpath and then sharing with other users, they will get a build problem report until they create that "ant" user library themselves. It's useful, but you need to share knowledge on how to create the library. If you're using it for simple cases like above, then instructions for adding the right jars to the library are straightforward.
Another approach I've used is to build classpaths pointing into a folder (or folders) defined as a variable in Eclipse. See File -> New Folder -> Advanced -> Link to folder in the file system -> Variables. This lets you setup (again at workspace level) variable references to one or more folders. You can then build your Eclipse classpath/s with reference to the folder/s.
So say in your development environment, everyone needs to have a directory called "thirdparty" containing all the external jars dependencies (probably in hierarchy within that dir: thirdparty/apache; thirdparty/sun; ...). You define "thirdparty" as a variable pointing to wherever that dir is on your current system, you create a folder in your project/s using the variable. You can then setup (and share) classpath using paths into that folder.
It's similar to User Library and with similar limitations. The limitation is that the other users you share your project with must create variable folder/s as you have. But it's more flexible in that they don't have to add the jars explicitly as they do with a library; rather, your classpath/s in Eclipse point into the folder, as required for each project.
Note that although the folder variable is defined at workspace level, it can be reused in multiple projects, each of which builds their classpaths (.classpath files) with different references into the folder).
This is maybe something easier to show than to describe with words, but I hope it makes sense.
I have a Java project I'd like to commit to my SVN repository, created with eclipse.
Now, what files (aside from the source code, obviously) are necessary? In the workspace root, there is a .settings folder with many files and subfolders, and inside the project folder there are two files - .classpath and .project, and another .settings folder with a single file - org.eclipse.jdt.core.prefs.
Which of these files should be committed to SVN and which can be safely excluded?
They're all useful if you want to have consistent settings across your team.
.classpath and .project mean everyone can get up and running with a project just by importing it. Any changes to the libraries and source files included in the project will be picked up by everyone when they're checked in.
The .settings directory has things like code formatting options and what the compiler considers as warnings, errors, or OK. For consistency, I've started checking these in as well (as long as everyone on your team can agree to a standard for formatting, I guess).
I've found that the biggest limitation in sharing things across version control in Eclipse is in the library definitions. Library definitions seem to be only stored on a per-user basis, so if you reference a "library" in the .classpath file, every other user has to manually define the contents of that library (or manually import your exported library definitions file).
Edit: (Addressing #mliebelt's comment below)
You'd only commit .settings files if you're trying to keep consistency/standardisation between developers. If that isn't an issue for the project, then not committing .settings files is one less thing to worry about maintaining. Files that are specific to an individual's favourite plugin(s) probably don't need to be committed either (although I don't think it would hurt if they were, would probably be ignored?).
The two most common ones I've found worth committing are org.eclipse.jdt.core.prefs and org.eclipse.jdt.ui.prefs, which are core to any (Java) Eclipse project.
You can exclude the .settings folder, but the .project file will be useful to other developers who want to reconstruct the same exact Eclipse project. If you examine the file it should only have relative references (if it doesn't, you should modify it as such.)
In contrast to the other answers I've made better experiences with not checking in the .project file in large open source projects that I work with.
You may disagree with me, but there is one problem with shared .project files: They contain references to the project natures used in the project. The project natures again depend on the plugins installed on the local developers machine.
Example: If you use Findbugs on a Java project, a new nature gets added to your Java project. Checking that file in, modifying it on another system (with no Findbugs installed) and afterwards using it on my system again has led to the Findbugs reference being lost for me (and therefore all Findbugs checks being removed silently).
But if you can have all of your developers agree on using the same tools, then you may be able to work around this problem easily.
I'm beginning to play with Clojure a bit and my Java experience is pretty limited. I'm coming from the dynamic world of Ruby and OO, so the functional side of things is very interesting!
Anyway, as I discover libraries and various tools for use (and the tutorial files for the Pragmatic Clojure Book), everything typically calls for placing files in the CLASSPATH in order for Clojure to see the library for use.
Is there such thing as good CLASSPATH practice? Would I ever want to only have a CLASSPATH with just the external libraries of files I need or can I go ahead toss any library or file I would ever need in a directory and simply define it as my CLASSPATH and only require what's needed?
If it helps, I'm an OSX and Emacs user (Using slime and swank-clojure).
I recommend using leiningen and lein-swank to manage this. You can start a REPL in the directory and connect to it from Emacs.
Personally, I'm using a variant of a clojure-project elisp function by Phil Hagelberg, see source in this post to the Clojure group. It sets up the classpath appropriately for the project you'll be working on, then launches SLIME. (EDIT: You'll need to change the value which gets assigned to swank-clojure-jar-path to point to clojure.jar. I'm using (expand-file-name "~/.clojure/clojure.jar") as the default.)
To answer the question about having everything on the classpath all the time vs only throwing in what's needed: to the best of my knowledge, nothing will actually break if you take the first approach (I know I do that for experimental purposes), but apparently things might break with the first approach (see cjstehno's comment below) and in a proper project I find the second to be cleaner. At some point it'll be necessary to determine what libs are being used (and which versions of them), if only to tell leiningen (or maven) about it -- why not keep tabs on it as you go.
We are using Clojure and use a number of infrastructure tools, especially Eclipse (IDE) (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eclipse_%28software%29) and maven (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Maven). maven manages libraries and jar dependencies so if you have a number of these and they are likely to grow start using maven.
In answer to your original question you can just put your jars in one directory and you can access them by name every time you run. But you will benefit from the tools...
If you are just exploring then Eclipse will probably manage your jar files fairly painlessly. You can add these to the project as required through the Build Path -> Configure Build Path option.
As your work progresses you will possibly wish to split it into Projects which Eclipse supports so you can add your (or other projects) to your Build Path.
If you use external Clojure libraries look to see if they have been packaged as maven projects (they will have a pom.xml file). The POM will give a list of dependencies.
#
The usual CLASSPATH practice for Java is to put only the jar files needed for a project into this projects class path, which means to have potentially different class paths for diffent projects. This is usually managed by the IDE as part of it's project properties.
Since you are using Emacs and thus probably don't have or use something like projects it might be more convinient for you to set up and use a single global class path for all your clojure related stuff or maybe even simply put all the needed jar files into the java2se/jre/lib/ext directory of your java installation.
The two main problems that could arise from having unneded jar files in your class path are: 1. it has a minor negative impact on the start up time of the JVM and 2. it becomes more difficult to make sure that you are not having classes with different versions in the same class path (i.e. different classes with the same package and name in different jar files).
Since Java SE 1.6 (or JDK 1.6) you can include class path entries by wildcard. If your class files live in .\bin, and your library jar files live in .\lib, then on Windows you could define your class path like this:
set CLASSPATH=bin;lib\*;
This will let you add jar files into the .\lib directory and they will automatically be added to the class path for new instances of the JRE.
See this link for details: Setting the class path
Prior to JDK 1.6 you had to add each jar file onto the ClassPath individually.
I just discovered this bit which I need to give a shot:
(setq swank-clojure-extra-classpaths (list "/class/path/1" "/class/path/2" "/class/path/3" "etc"))
clojure-contrib/launchers/bash/clj-env-dir has an interesting property that you can point it at a directory and it will basically include anything in there. In the past I've had a ~/classpath directory which I would dump any jars into and link any commonly used directories and it worked great. Very simple way to dump and use. Now I tend to use Maven clojure-maven-plugin and that works well also though can be a bit tedious when you just want to muck around with some ideas.